“Third Worlders” & Non-Whites: There are DIFFERENCES THAT MAKE A DIFFERENCE and not hard to discern

Posted by DanielS on Wednesday, 23 March 2016 22:08.

“Third Worlders”, “Non-Whites”,  “Asians”... There are DIFFERENCES THAT MAKE A DIFFERENCE

                      “Third World immigration is the real culprit” - TNO

               
               

               

               
                tari-huli images from this site.


               
               
                Photo: Dabiq/Corbis


  Observe the DIFFERENCES, they are NOT TOO COMPLICATED TO DISCERN
               
                   

               



Comments:


1

Posted by Just Sayin' on Wed, 23 Mar 2016 23:26 | #

I’m not one of those guys who knows about ethnic-genetic interests, but aren’t the civilized non-whites more of a threat than the Papuans?

I mean, obvious barbarians like Papuans, Africans, Muslims, are liable to provoke a backlash that will lead to either expulsion or at least a reduction in further migration.

But non-whites who contribute to the economy and assimilate are less likely to provoke a backlash, but will slowly take consolidate their power and “assimilate” with whites, perhaps eventually becoming disruptive or at least altering the white genotype.

Muslims are very widely hated in the U.S. and there is a sense that they can’t push their luck forever. But if you look at the New York Times marriage announcements, it’s nothing but whites (mostly males) marrying “civilized” non-whites (mostly Asian females). In less affluent areas, it’s Mestizo females.

Good luck getting rid of the offspring of those repugnant unions.


2

Posted by DanielS on Thu, 24 Mar 2016 04:37 | #

Well, “Just Sayin”,

Your comment this time around isn’t flying very high. Perhaps you are putting too much faith in Donald Trump-like social research (i.e., making it up).

I’m not one of those guys who knows about ethnic-genetic interests, but aren’t the civilized non-whites more of a threat than the Papuans?

You did this last time too, that is, take what is meant to be an example that there are patterns of difference to observe - viz., between “third world” and non-White people generally - and focus instead on Papuans, as if the example of that specific group was my point and the point.

Its a kind of Jewish lawyerly thing to do.

But yes, for one thing, in terms of EGI, Africans and Denisovans are arguably among the worst Europeans can mix with. Moreover, if you take my example as I actually meant it, not strictly about Paupuans but about blacks, plenty of mixing does occur - quite dangerous and destructive.

I mean, obvious barbarians like Papuans, Africans, Muslims, are liable to provoke a backlash that will lead to either expulsion or at least a reduction in further migration.

Africans and Muslims will not necessarily provoke thorough-enough backlash to prevent vast destruction either - hell, they’ve already done it. That is a long topic. You stepped in it - its everywhere now and will take a long time to clean up.

In fact, look at your right winger TRS friend’s typical soft peddling of blacks (discussion with Anglin just the other day). Plenty of mudsharks will be glad to hear it.

But non-whites who contribute to the economy and assimilate are less likely to provoke a backlash,

Asians do things in such a way that we can manage a process of mutual maintenance of our EGI, whereas blacks and Muslims cannot be reasoned with, while they comport significant religious fervor and unrefined bio-power to impose race-mixing.

Moreover, Asians are pretty clannish too - forming China-towns and so on, even where they are among us. They are not necessarily too keen on mixing themselves away either and they can probably see the value in having White allies against Muslim and black populations.

but will slowly take consolidate their power and “assimilate” with whites,

Some will assimilate, but it is exactly the slowness of the process, an expression of historical sublimation and consideration, which can allow us to control it.

perhaps eventually becoming disruptive or at least altering the white genotype.

They will alter some of us, and it is a process that has to be managed carefully, so that we are not losing important alleles. That is why I propose the DNA Nation - and I believe Asians can see the merit of cooperating with it. Whereas that is literally against the Abrahamic religions (just ask Matt Parrott) and black impulse control.

Muslims are very widely hated in the U.S. and there is a sense that they can’t push their luck forever.

I refer back to your Trump-like social survey. Fine and good if they do hate them, but I believe that they will mix and it is a part of their region to mix. Further, these hatreds are frequently used by American media to divert from other necessary racial hatreds.

But if you look at the New York Times marriage announcements, it’s nothing but whites (mostly males) marrying “civilized” non-whites (mostly Asian females). In less affluent areas, it’s Mestizo females.

It sounds as if you’ve been listening to too many American women trying to justify their coal burning.

Did they seriously think that ANYBODY could think that a small percentage White men intermarrying with Asian women could be as bad as White women going with blacks?

Oops, by golly, you have believed them!

It’s a classic way of pandering to females, saying to them, “oh, blacks are not so bad..it’s those Asians and White men who are not as masculine as blacks that are the problem.”

Big, tough liberal that you are ...and there are the White guys stuck in the mud puddles of the hogsty you try to soft peddle ...“oh, blacks are not so bad!”... sure. And the coal burners avidly agree with the full Kosher seal of approval..

Go to work, make things run for blacks, mudsharks, mulattoes ...Jewish kang makers..

Some White guys opt out of that scene…they might go for an Asian woman rather than putting up with that abuse.

Good luck getting rid of the offspring of those repugnant unions.

I can agree that it should be kept to a minimum and with strict accountability; I had a good laugh at the meme you guys put up:


“Only YOU can prevent Elliot Rodgers”

Maybe there was some Denisovan in his woodpile and it shows up in his lips; but even if he did not have sense enough to bale out of the coal burning hell, flee to Asia and opt for an Asian woman himself….

It is a ridiculous comparison- Asians /mixed White-Asians - if the comparison is to blacks and Mulattoes.

Pandering to females is as lame as it gets, and it is a central part of the problem that our race has.

Now, if you had been a little sharper this time around, you might have challenged me on my example: Is the oriental girl to the right an authentic “Tibetan” or is she a Chinese woman in Tibetan garb?

That it might not be so easy to tell the difference could belie my point - especially if I had a particularly negative view of Chinese or Indians (which I do not) - while Chinese occupation of Tibet, rather, would lend weight to the expansionist and assimilationist concerns you’ve expressed.

Here is a genetic argument for Tibetans as “Chinese”, obviously from a Chinese point of view.


3

Posted by Just Sayin' on Thu, 24 Mar 2016 16:35 | #

I just wanted to mention that I am not a member of TRS, I’m just an anonymous commenter over there who has zero influence with the main guys. TRS has never heard of you.

I just happen to remember this site from my survey of all WN material few years ago and check in occasionally. I only bring up TRS from time to time because of your series on the Alt-Right, it being one of the Alt-Right sites that is more explicitly WN, so perhaps accessible to you guys.

Anyway, I have a different take on it than you.

It’s obvious that the offspring of Black / White pairing are more alien and are essentially just creating more black people. But this is in some ways a positive, because even normies can see it, and it makes it easier to push those offspring into the out-group. To essentially say “those are black people”.

That’s what they did in the American South for a long time, and it prevented introgression of African DNA into the white gene pool despite the disgusting proclivities of the White Southerners. Supporting a large population of blacks and mulattoes was certainly a terrible mistake, but at least whites in the South remained white.

This solution is obviously breaking down in the face of progressive induced racial chaos, but there is still a sense that half blacks are recognized as black and pushed into black spaces. It provides some hope for avoiding Brazil in the future, especially given that the coalburners tend to be uh… downwardly mobile and will hopefully produce downwardly mobile niglets who go off and assimilate with blacks, effectively erasing themselves.

On the other hand, the offspring of Asian / White pairings appear less alien, tend to be somewhat economically productive / upwardly mobile and with the exception of those who fall victim to their higher rates of mental illness, are liable to hang around with whites, and “assimilate” with them. Outside of an explicitly White Nationalist revolution, I have no idea how we’re going to get rid of them, they’re not just going to go off and erase themselves by assimilating with Asians. Rather, they’re going to stick around and pozz the white gene pool.

Turning white people into black people is bad, but it won’t bring about white genocide in and of itself. White genocide will happen when the white gene pool has been sufficiently enriched with non-white DNA that whites aren’t really white anymore but are some amorphous population of mongrelized hybrids and whatever traits made whites a unique people are unrecoverable.

Obviously black genes do more “damage” to the white gene pool when they get in there, but because of the vast differences and the bad behavior of blacks, there is also more hope of keeping them out and pushing them into the black pool. Most normie Whites don’t want to be around blacks.

Whites have an intellectual toolkit that allows them to get rid of black hybrids, turning them into blacks. But they don’t have the same thing for Asians hybrids. And so, absent an explicitly White Nationalist mental revolution, those hybrids are liable to stick around and damage the white gene pool. And that pool is very fragile right now. And that process of mixing tends to be self reinforcing, once people have mixed relatives or are mixed themselves, the barrier to further mixing is reduced.

Attacking third worlders is very easy, so easy even a normie can do it. What is difficult but essential is figuring out how to keep out the Elliot Rodgers, half-Jews, half-Indians, etc that will actually carry out white genocide; mixing up the white gene pool so much that nobody is really white anymore, even though they look kind of white and are good at office work. So that’s why I had to counter-signal your philo-Asian post.


4

Posted by DanielS on Thu, 24 Mar 2016 17:29 | #

Ok, pardon my speculating incorrectly about your identity but you’ve been presenting the TRS perspective here in your last several comments. Your argument does display genuine concern; however I would merely and most essentially repeat what I’ve said in my previous comment about Asians being reasonable in regard to a DNA Nations cooperation whereas Africans and Muslims are not - and race mixing, where not a part of their religious mandate, is a hyper active part of their genetic predisposition.


5

Posted by Ted Sallis + Russian Jews on Sun, 27 Mar 2016 17:23 | #

In apparent commitment to the well being of Russian Jews, Ted Sallis is talking smack about this thread - or any thread that prefers Asians over Russian Jews - quoting the parts convenient to distort and leaving out parts that would disprove his pathetic smear campaign. I (DanielS) am worse than John Derbeyshire (lol). Has anyone listened to that philosemitic, anti-racist, objectivist fool lately?


6

Posted by Guessedworker on Sun, 27 Mar 2016 19:17 | #

Daniel, do you have a publicly accessible link to that Ted Sallis comment?


7

Posted by Kumiko Oumae on Sun, 27 Mar 2016 21:17 | #

I think he’s referring to this: http://eginotes.blogspot.co.uk/2016/03/the-d-and-d-boys-are-at-it-again.html

Sallis seems to think that DanielS created this thread at my behest or something, even though I actually had absolutely nothing to do with it.


8

Posted by Guessedworker on Sun, 27 Mar 2016 23:38 | #

OK, well, I am sad to see such coarse and inconsistent thinking from Ted Sallis.  There is a small group of people who, down the years, have at one time or another been critical of me personally as well as of this site, to whom I have chosen to make no response.  Ted, who blogged here very productively for a lengthy period, falls into that category, and I am loathe to say very much about his comments.

But I will say this. 

The grand cause we, as nationalists, avow is the sovereign and true, consciously expressed life of Man.  It has a universality which precludes conflict between the individual and the biological system from which his life came genetically and into which it flows - just as Salter’s conception of ethnic genetic interest, and the nationalism he derives from it, have universality.  Likewise, the forces acting against that sovereign and true life have a totalistic ambition and a global reach.  There is such a thing as universality (as opposed to universalism), and we do deal in it.  It does not hold implications for miscegenation, and connecting the two is a spectacular intellectual failing.  Knowing Ted has a very sharp mind, and respecting him from close experience of that, I am at a loss to understand how he can get that so wrong.  Maybe Daniel’s post did not help.  But it did not mention egi or genetic distance, so what the heck is Ted actually complaining about?


9

Posted by DanielS on Mon, 28 Mar 2016 01:09 | #

The quote that Graham cites works just fine for me and there is no contradiction between it and what I am saying.

Let me add, however, that nationalism is about ethnocentrism even before “truth” per se.

Nevertheless, I believe Salter’s “universal nationalism” is just fine - true enough ethnocentrism - and a good common ground to deal with the rest of the world.

Moreover, it is hard to keep track of lies and live a coherent ethnocetric life as a nationalist or otherwise while being dishonest…that is a part of why I am all for truth and being for truth is why I am reluctant to even bother with Sallis’ comments after already having seen his selective take - convenient misrepresentations so that he can launch smears on behalf of an antagonistic political viewpoint - against what is being said here.

I doubt very much that Sallis would bother with my comments here about the DNA Nation and the commitment to that - or any part which would find me innocent of the nefarious agenda he would impute to me.

I’ll look at Sallis’ thing in the morning. However, he hasn’t cared to understand nor honestly debate what I am saying in the past, so I am not particularly concerned with what he says now - he is not an honest, serious broker of the truth.

About this post not helping his mis-perception, well, perhaps if one wants to look upon this post, and judge it as he apparently does, as a transmission model of communication (the transmission model is another artifact of the Cartesian model) then it does not “help”, but that is not how I meant it - as if I am presenting myself as Moses having received truth from gawd and then transmitting it to the people who open the received package in their heads. Despite the Internet being 20 years old, people still want to treat information in this transmission model, like passive receptors from Television, Talmudvison/Mount Sinai, rather than an opportunity for active participation and joint construction.

You’d think they’d be desperate to get away from that brainwashing model, where you could not talk back but just sat there passively while the electric J informed your brain. You would think people would be eager for a different way of knowledge construction. But in Sallis’ case, that’s apparently just not the motive. I don’t think he wants this other way. He is protecting what is behind the old model.

I’ve a hunch that he’s defending Russian Jews and that is behind his antagonism to what we are discussing here and his fear of the proposed alliance between Europeans and Asians - because Jews, Russians Jews and otherwise will be defeated by this alliance.

It is a clearly reasonable hypothesis for MR to consider alliance with Asians against Arabs, Jews and blacks.

When we saw TNO not making any distinctions between “third worlders”, seeing them all antagonistically, it seemed a good time to re-consider differences among them with fellow ethnonationalists.

Therefore, in this post, I had set forth a few examples for discussion and experiment in joint construction of knowledge: aren’t these people different? Aren’t the differences pretty obvious?

Actually, the differences are pretty obvious and benign in some cases; but not so easy to tease apart nor so benign in other cases.

This is apparently an Asian man who has adopted Islamic (Middle Eastern ) ways, to the point where he has made himself into the new Jihadi John. This demonstrates that rule structures can guide genetics away from their inherited forms - in fact, he had this mixed race child, according to Islam’s race mixing rules -

The sorting process of one’s own people, friendly and unfriendly others, is interesting. Kumiko tells me that Japanese have a word for people who are obvious others, but do not tend to refer to Chinese or Koreans as “other” in the first place, because they cannot readily tell them apart. While Europeans do not even have a term for obvious others - for non-Europeans/non-Whites.


10

Posted by Just Sayin' on Mon, 28 Mar 2016 03:40 | #

The problem with glorifying Asia is… China.

They are like high functioning third worlders. Their society is really, really vile and alien to white sensibilities, they’re liable to colonize at least one white country in the near future (AUS) and they represent our most significant non-white rival after the Jews are dealt with. Somehow they ended up with a lot of our technology and industry and they’re on the rise while we’re on the decline.

You think you can make deals with them, but you can’t bargain with something you don’t control in the first place. As long as Jews run the show, Chinese would have no reason to make deals with pro-whites to limit Chinese genetic colonization of the West.

Once Jews are out of the picture, we can probably make a deal with the Chinese (although they’re not to be trusted). But they’re still our biggest non-white rival, because if whites magically got rid of Jews and fixed white mental attitudes, the lesser races would no longer be any kind of significant problem for long. They can’t fight effectively outside of 4GW and 4GW would no longer work in this hypothetical.

You might counter that the lesser races are the most significant threat, because whites will never magically get rid of Jews and fix our own mental attitudes. But that also means there is no possibility of “negotiating” with the Chinese, because as slaves without control of our own country, we have nothing to bargain with and there is no incentive for the Chinese to let up their offensive against us. Instead they should grab all they can.

The only deal with Asia that should be considered is one where we team up with Japan and maybe Korea to contain China. Presumably that’s bad for their EGI, but maybe that measurement will never catch on. Certainly the major threat to Japan (other than globalists) is China.

So honestly, I can see why the original post would provoke a strong negative response.


11

Posted by DanielS on Mon, 28 Mar 2016 08:09 | #

Well spoken, Just Sayin,’ but as I understand the geo-political situation, Japan’s greatest concern and rival is not China, but The Russian Federation - I imagine that a Judaized, propositional Russian Federation, in particular, would be problematic (for all non-Jewish sides) as they continue to meddle in Asia, putting it in Japan’s face in the far east and playing brinkmanship via North Korea. Neither is China a natural ally of The Russian Federation. In effect, an unwieldy Russian Federation is likely to make deals with Israel, while China remains no real friend of the Russian Federation, even though Putin tries to portray the relation as amicable.

Of course China should not be trusted too much. They will test you; Europeans need to be solidly grounded as a whole group, and come from a position of economic and military strength - but then that is mentioned as one of the key reasons for organizing as a whole race - a genus of species - so that we can have the economy necessary to fund large scale projects; markedly, space exploration and to support a military sufficient to hold up to China.

On a more optimistic note, observe that a European “Intermarium” alliance with Asia, toward our mutual aims, is already happening.


12

Posted by DanielS on Mon, 28 Mar 2016 11:25 | #

Alright then, I’m looking at Sallis’ blog post and seeing that the man is only once again proving himself to be dishonest and an idiot.

It is a foregone conclusion that he is going to draw straw men and argue against them in order to advance his agenda, that is why he will not come here to debate us.

Anyway, let’s look at Sallis’ selective offering this time:

The D and D Boys Are At It Again
Durocher and Daniel S (imitating Derbyshire).

As if there is some kind of alliance, common ground and conversation between us?  When I listened to Derbeyshire’s last talk (with Richard Spencer), I was appalled.

I’ve read or skimmed a few pieces by Durocher, but I’d have to refresh my memory to distinguish him from the blur of other writers - he seems to be one inclined to resurrect Hitler and his Reich, and I tend to let that kind remain in the blur.

So what is the common ground, that we all have the letter “D” in our names?

I have to give credit to Sallis for that, however, he sure is a sleuth in his capacity to uncover nefarioius patterns - “D”, a yes, the Devil-D….

Let’s see what the Devil D’s are up to..

Read and laugh.

Ok, let’s have fun..

Another pathetic and rambling bit of try-hard nonsense from Durocher

This D Devil is Durocher and his effort gets the traditional Jewish journalese term - “rambling” - that is their introductory term for their antagonist’s writings (along with “rant”) following their mandatory style book to signal to their audience, “read in this way”: a “mad man”, “irrational”, “disorganized thoughts.”

The use of the term “Rambling” is more a signal of who Sallis’ friends are than anything else.

Durocher the Untermenschen, scurrying around a topic, never coming to any definitive conclusions, promoting his own writings, including his imbecilic musinderstandings of population genetics. Note also how he tries to defend Hitler at Counter-Currents, while at The Occidental Observer these days it is Jews, Jews, Jews.

Ok, so Sallis doesn’t want people to talk about Jews, Jews, Jews…and those who might look at Jewish supremaicsm are “untermenschen”  ...there’s something all too kosher in your view, Ted. We should not be too critical of Jews, aye?

It just so happens that Jews have disproportionate and enormous influence in 7 key choke points: money, politics, academia, media, religion, law/courts, business/professions. And with that power and influence, it just so happens that they can have an ethnostate (that includes genetic testing to confirm qualification for inclusion) prohibition of race mixing, while they do all they can to prohibit us from having ethnostates and enforce race mixing upon us, to now epoch proportions.

But lets go on and hear why we should not align with Asia against that.

Daniel S at Majority Rights has a new post that reaches new heights in the HBD NAMs meme, outdoing the likes of Derbyshire.

Non-alignment? I constantly advocate that European peoples and nations organize in our own defense, align with each other and Asia.

It includes this comment:

       

I see nothing to change in that remark. I said that it is “arguable” and it is an argument that I maintain. But I must add that GW is correct, I was not speaking necessarily of genetic distance here, but rather more of genetic interests in a literal, qualitative sense of asking which groups could be best worked with and which intermarriage would be most controllable and felicitous if controlled.

However, I do thank Sallis for giving an example of the kind of “pull down quote” that we should implement into MR’s formatting tools. That was about the only good thing in this post at his blog. Nevertheless, let’s continue..

Yeah, plenty of mixing occurs with East Asians – quite dangerous and destructive.

Perhaps yes, that is why the DNA Nations have to be implemented in order to get a handle on our genetic resource for the sake of accountability and management, so that we do not continue to lose precious genetics or even have them turned against us, as the Jews have turned our genetics against us, e.g., in the case of Sallis’ Russian/Jewish friends.

As I’ve always said, Majority Rights has always had a complete misunderstanding – or in some cases intentional misuse - of the EGI concept.

I don’t think that even I misunderstand it and I am the least versed in genetics among GW, Kumiko and Graham, certainly.

             

Nevertheless, I will take “liberty” with the word “interests” as it corresponds with advocacy of genetic groups - and with that, will not always apply it in terms of distance, but rather consider qualitative fit, as I have in this discussion.

(no wonder certain academics avoid them).

We’ve already discussed how you attempted to poison Salter’s mind against us.

But we’ll be just fine, and I am sure that he will be too, thanks for your concern.

Fact is, East Asians are almost as genetically distant from Europeans as are Negroes and Papuans.

Almost as genetically distant, but as GW said, distance was not the main point or purpose of the discussion, but rather felicity.

The NECs that MR castigates are much, much, more genetically closer to Europeans than are East Asians.

Who is the amateur and the disingenuous one here?

Genetic distance does not always correspond with felicity.

But yes, Ted, your beloved Ashkenazi Jews share more alleles with Europeans - much to their chagrin.
               
               
This Jewish female, the obvious product of forebears mixing with Europeans, now having gene hijacked to her tribes’ satisfaction, brazenly and vulgarly preaches against intermixing with Europeans (she also has a message for Jewish adulating and Zionist Christians).

As far as net EGI goes – which takes into account the on-the-ground behaviors of groups that affect EGI –

Ok, so now Sallis admits that “on the ground”, i.e., practical and qualitative, considerations are taken into account where genetic interests are concerned (but we “have no concept” because we don’t stake everything on distance).

we can note significant East Asian immigration to the Anglosphere, significant interbreeding with Whites, and the seething Yellow Peril hatred of nations like China for the West.

Ha! ha! ha! I literally laughed out loud. You’re not only showing your hand, but you are wearing your heart on your sleeve, Ted.

And, unlike Negroes and Papuans, the Yellow Peril constitutes a real and long-tern military and economic threat to the West.

“The Yellow peril” ..ok, let me stop laughing and recognize that our comedy is your tragedy and fear as the advocate of Jewish mixed people that you are.

The peril is of the Jewish agenda: the peril is of those who would be bought-off to accept it; the peril is of mixed people; Arabs and mulattoes - these peoples have overwhelming monetary and other forms of Abrahamic/and objectivist backing…along with genetic resource in terms of quantity and quality of bio-power (long pre-evolved to Europeans) that can overwhelm Europeans by their present structure or by mutation.

Once again, my suspicions are aroused: that East Asians see their women as a weapon of war to be used against European Man

Ha! Ha! Ha! No, Ted, it is your Jewish friends who do that, and you are trying to project that motive and turn it into a “yellow peril”

Well, you promised laughs and you made good on that one, at least.

Ask Chinese, Japanese and Korean men if they have women to spare.

(and I use the male sex there intentionally), to influence Whites to take pro-Asian attitudes against the interests of their own people.

Jews are not our people Ted, Whites are.

And before love-struck White Knights, defending Yellows, accuse this blog of “sucking Jewish cock” as part of a conspiracy to derail the budding White-Yellow alliance

Yes, Ted, and you/they are afraid of this alliance and you are cowering, mouth open wide before the Jewish rod.

(an alliance that seems well consummated by Derbyshire’s “measured groveling” to his wife), I can point out that any cursory reading of this blog – and my work in its entirety – makes clear that I’m no friend of the Jews.

Yes, you are a friend of the Jews and you are a liar.

Amazingly enough, it is possible to be against both Jews and East Asians at the same time.

It is possible in theory, necessary to some extent, but not practical to the extent that alliance with Asia is not worked-out.

I cannot consider MR a pro-White site.

Then you are a liar and an idiot.

We are not a “pro-White” site by your definition because you want to include mixed Jews as “White” and because we see alliance with Asia as highly practical.

The “majority” they are concerned with is apparently East Asian and not European.

What a ridiculous lie. Your Jewish coaches must provide you with better.

The curtain descends there, leaving GW, Daniel S, and Kumiko to gibber among themselves.
Posted by JWH at 3:56 AM

That is yours, and your Jewish friend’s hope, to have people not hear what we are saying here.


       
Ted Sallis mask: looks like huWhite advocacy


13

Posted by Decoding Ted Sallis word salad on Thu, 07 Apr 2016 19:38 | #

Decoding Ted Sallis word salad..

A kosher salad it is:

In this article currently running at counter-currents, he starts to slip, showing his hand at the paragraph that begins here:

The same people who argue against EGI on the basis that “human groups are virtually genetically the same” would probably be unconvinced by alien claims that dispossession of humans is no problem given that the great apes will be left unmolested and, by alien standards, humans and chimps are virtually genetically identical.

I wouldn’t be too quick to assume that these liberal sorts would be unconvinced that humanity is more important than other forms of life..but let’s move further into Sallis assumptions..

Further, if the aliens claim that there is “greater genetic variation within the human family than there is between humans and aliens” would that make the dispossession of the human race any more palatable to the same humanist-multiculturalist-HBD types who use all these same arguments to delegitimize Eurocentric activism?

Sallis is angling to protect Ashkenazi Jews, i.e., mixed Jewish / European people by presenting them as being more closely related to us than literal aliens.

The next paragraph begins:

Of course, the Left-HBD faction need to get their memes straight.

In service of the tribe, he still wants “the Left” to be the enemy, because the White left is where we argue on the basis of an ethny that excludes Jews from the White ethny.

Take the argument that “there is more genetic variation within than between groups and there is virtually no real biological differences between human groups.” Very well.

Is that very well? It’s very well if you are trying to take that for granted in order to blur the distinction between Jews and Whites.

Here is where Sallis begins to display an argument very typical of Judeo-centrics:

But, doesn’t that mean that investing in a single ethny has a great cost-benefit ratio? After all, according to the anti-EGI crowd, a single ethny contains more genetic variation than that found between groups; indeed, we are told that the vast bulk of human genetic variation is found within single population groups. So! All you need to do is preserve one group and you have virtually all the genetic variation right there. No need to preserve all humanity. Why, after all, groups are all the same, aren’t they? And isn’t it easier to invest in a single ethny, concentrating your investment there, than to dilute it over all humanity? Indeed, if we are all the same, then investing in humanity is a superfluous waste of resources. Save a single group, reap the benefits of all that internal genetic variation and diversity, and if the rest of humanity is lost, no problem — no differences between groups anyway. QED.

Ted has just made the argument of “the chosen” - the Jews - as the only ones necessary to save.

But his concerns are a bit more complicated than that. It is the Ashkenazi that he is concerned for - for their mixed element, as it contains high I.Q. and stolen European treasures in addition to relations that he cares about personally and professionally. He goes on to argue…

However, that argument would never be made by the anti-White Left and the anti-White HBDers. Instead, we’ll get talk about the “rich and diverse tapestry of humanity” — but when that tapestry is interpreted as including Europeans, watch the cognitive dissonance unfold and suddenly we are all the same and why be so concerned about individual groups. Genetic and diversity arguments shift back and forth and the only unifying theme is that whatever bolsters investing in humanity over ethny, and more specifically, whatever delegitimizes the pursuit of White interests, is the meme promoted.

His concern is that mixed Jews be considered “White” where that European part of their genetics won’t hold sway to make them part of a European “ethny”... but if it does, then the ethny will be ok with Ted.

Getting back to the arguments supporting betraying humanity to aliens, of course, I doubt any of these Left-HBD specimens would dare make such arguments. Therefore, we see a clear case of the legitimacy of the defense of ethny being specifically disregarded, specifically targeted.

You specifically disregard it Ted, every time you try to de-legitimize The White Left - because race and its subcategories are its unit of analysis and defense - and you, Ted, try to disregard it or target it for de-legitimization every time you try to discredit or divert attention away from Majorityrights:

In On Genetic Interests, Salter provides some impressionistic (qualitative) graphs interpreting how different ideologies distribute interests along the continuum of Self-Family-Offspring-Humanity. Putting aside minor quibbles (both offspring and ethny can be more fine-grained categories with different levels of relatedness — offspring can be extended to the entire family, including distinctions such as brother vs. cousin; ethny can have ethnic group vs. race, etc.) this is a quite useful instrument to think about the relationship between memes and genes, and how cultural artifacts and social technologies affect our genetic interests. These charts are an underestimated and under discussed part of the book; besides myself, the only other person I know of who tried to discuss this in a useful fashion is Bowery on a blog post from several years ago.

And what blog post might that have been, Ted? I notice that you don’t dare mention it and legitimize it in polite company, any more than you would come to argue with us - why, Ted? But we know why. You would lose and be exposed as the imposter to advocating White interests that you are.

For some reason — one that cannot be based on logic or objectivity — self, family, and humanity are considered worthwhile for defense, but the other link in the chain of interests — ethny — is somehow considered an illegitimate focus of interest or concern.

You know good and well that the mystery is solved, Ted, once that one group that is necessary to save is just a little more inclusive to take on a bit more of that European DNA that it’s hijacked in order to make the rest of them expendable to the chosen EGI - if it includes that sufficient breadth - then ethny, its ethny, anyway, will be “legitimate.”

Well, let’s be honest — that’s not the case for everyone. For most peoples, a concern for ethny is acceptable — it is only for European-derived peoples that the ethny part of the chain of interests is skipped over, not legitimate, not considered as valid. It is ONLY and specifically White ethnic interests that form a gap of interest, it is only for Whites that the chain goes self-offspring-humanity, while for every other group it is self-offspring-ethny-humanity.

The stealth here, is that he is including Ashkenazi as “White.”

This is proof positive that the delegitimization of White ethnic self-defense is not only illogical, but is an open attack against White interests, it is form of memetic warfare against the entire race as part of inter-group competition and as part of free-riding by White traitors.

Get it?  To Sallis, those who exclude Jews or exclude part Jews are promoting “inter-group competition” and are “traitors” to the “race.”

      - Comment by DanielS


14

Posted by Captainchaos on Fri, 08 Apr 2016 00:52 | #

Lollzzzllzzzzllluzlllzz

In a recent post Michael Ravioli said he would be willing to exterminate 15-20% of the Italian people as a part of his “New Order” eugenics program.  At this point he is bouncing off the walls of his rubber room with spaghetti sauce coming out of his ears.  Ravioli is a disgrace to great Italian-Americans like Dom Deluise, the Super Mario Brothers and Luca Brasi who fucks the fishes at the bottom of the ocean.


15

Posted by DanielS on Sat, 09 Apr 2016 11:56 | #

If Ravioli is indeed willing to have 15-20% of Italians sacrificed, it would go to show that he has priorities other than Italians per se.


16

Posted by "Is this Africa?" - Japanese girl in Paris on Wed, 13 Apr 2016 03:37 | #

Is this Africa?” - Japanese Girl goes on Paris vacation for her VLOG, can’t believe her Eyes, 3 Mar, 2016

A Japanese girl goes on vacation to France to document her experiences. Her intention: Showing the atmosphere and exploring some of the romantic Stereotypes of the iconic city. Instead she got what appeared to her like a run-down African ghetto mixed with Arabic and Asian ambience. Coming from a nation with very little immigration, she was very surprised when she barely saw any French people - in Paris, the capital



Post a comment:


Name: (required)

Email: (required but not displayed)

URL: (optional)

Note: You should copy your comment to the clipboard or paste it somewhere before submitting it, so that it will not be lost if the session times out.

Remember me


Next entry: Militantly liberal teachers demand that schools should stop promoting ‘British values’.
Previous entry: Obvious ambush: Donald Trump embraces the Jews, and then opens fire against White Nationalists.

image of the day

Existential Issues

DNA Nations

Categories

Contributors

Each author's name links to a list of all articles posted by the writer.

Links

Endorsement not implied.

Immigration

Islamist Threat

Anti-white Media Networks

Audio/Video

Crime

Economics

Education

General

Historical Re-Evaluation

Controlled Opposition

Nationalist Political Parties

Science

Europeans in Africa

Of Note

Comments

Guessedworker commented in entry 'Soren Renner Is Dead' on Thu, 28 Mar 2024 16:55. (View)

Guessedworker commented in entry 'Moscow's Bataclan' on Thu, 28 Mar 2024 16:38. (View)

Thorn commented in entry 'Moscow's Bataclan' on Thu, 28 Mar 2024 14:36. (View)

Guessedworker commented in entry 'Moscow's Bataclan' on Thu, 28 Mar 2024 12:50. (View)

Thorn commented in entry 'Moscow's Bataclan' on Thu, 28 Mar 2024 10:26. (View)

Al Ross commented in entry 'Moscow's Bataclan' on Thu, 28 Mar 2024 05:37. (View)

Thorn commented in entry 'Moscow's Bataclan' on Tue, 26 Mar 2024 15:07. (View)

Thorn commented in entry 'Moscow's Bataclan' on Tue, 26 Mar 2024 11:00. (View)

Al Ross commented in entry 'Moscow's Bataclan' on Tue, 26 Mar 2024 05:02. (View)

Thorn commented in entry 'Moscow's Bataclan' on Mon, 25 Mar 2024 11:39. (View)

Al Ross commented in entry 'Out of foundation and into the mind-body problem, part four' on Mon, 25 Mar 2024 09:56. (View)

Al Ross commented in entry 'Moscow's Bataclan' on Mon, 25 Mar 2024 07:51. (View)

Al Ross commented in entry 'Moscow's Bataclan' on Mon, 25 Mar 2024 07:46. (View)

Al Ross commented in entry 'Moscow's Bataclan' on Mon, 25 Mar 2024 07:41. (View)

Thorn commented in entry 'Moscow's Bataclan' on Sun, 24 Mar 2024 12:25. (View)

Guessedworker commented in entry 'Moscow's Bataclan' on Sun, 24 Mar 2024 00:42. (View)

Thorn commented in entry 'Moscow's Bataclan' on Sat, 23 Mar 2024 22:01. (View)

Thorn commented in entry 'Moscow's Bataclan' on Sat, 23 Mar 2024 21:20. (View)

Guessedworker commented in entry 'Moscow's Bataclan' on Sat, 23 Mar 2024 20:51. (View)

Guessedworker commented in entry 'Moscow's Bataclan' on Sat, 23 Mar 2024 20:45. (View)

Thorn commented in entry 'Moscow's Bataclan' on Sat, 23 Mar 2024 17:26. (View)

Manc commented in entry 'Moscow's Bataclan' on Sat, 23 Mar 2024 15:56. (View)

Thorn commented in entry 'Moscow's Bataclan' on Sat, 23 Mar 2024 14:55. (View)

Guessedworker commented in entry 'Moscow's Bataclan' on Sat, 23 Mar 2024 14:07. (View)

Thorn commented in entry 'Moscow's Bataclan' on Sat, 23 Mar 2024 13:12. (View)

Thorn commented in entry 'Moscow's Bataclan' on Sat, 23 Mar 2024 12:51. (View)

Thorn commented in entry 'Out of foundation and into the mind-body problem, part four' on Sat, 23 Mar 2024 12:38. (View)

Guessedworker commented in entry 'Moscow's Bataclan' on Sat, 23 Mar 2024 10:01. (View)

Al Ross commented in entry 'Out of foundation and into the mind-body problem, part four' on Sat, 23 Mar 2024 05:13. (View)

Thorn commented in entry 'Out of foundation and into the mind-body problem, part four' on Fri, 22 Mar 2024 23:51. (View)

Thorn commented in entry 'Out of foundation and into the mind-body problem, part four' on Thu, 21 Mar 2024 11:14. (View)

Al Ross commented in entry 'Out of foundation and into the mind-body problem, part four' on Thu, 21 Mar 2024 05:14. (View)

Thorn commented in entry 'Out of foundation and into the mind-body problem, part four' on Tue, 19 Mar 2024 11:42. (View)

Al Ross commented in entry 'Out of foundation and into the mind-body problem, part four' on Tue, 19 Mar 2024 11:01. (View)

Thorn commented in entry 'Out of foundation and into the mind-body problem, part four' on Tue, 19 Mar 2024 10:41. (View)

affection-tone