Those wonderful, tolerant, diversity-loving San Franciscans

Posted by John S Bolton on January 07, 2005, 12:29 AM | #

Hopefully, the right will make the most of this. The left is the vanguard of Nazi sentiment in the country, not hesitating to say that ‘Hitler should have finished the job’ on the Jews. How is that for progressive tolerance and being metro over against the retro hinterlands with their bible-induced loyalty to Israel? Since the end of WW2, the left has been using their false dilemma/slippery slope argument that ungenerous welfare provision=racism=nazism=mass-murder, since one supposedly must lead to the others. What a shame that anyone believed them to be sincere, when they pretended to be against mass-murder.

Posted by Effra on January 07, 2005, 04:46 AM | #

It shows what a failure multiracialism is, importing tedious and insoluble foreign quarrels into a country thousands of miles away.

Once white Americans secede and form their own nation(s) on the North American continent, these tensions will be dissipated. The movement for separate statehood in Northern California is a promising start.

Posted by John S Bolton on January 07, 2005, 06:17 AM | #

If America gets partitioned, it would be because the government deliberately started violent conflicts in order to set up a dictatorship. Such a process would not be peaceful, even though colonies in the Pacific obtained independence very quietly, and PR and VI could do the same.

Posted by Niki Raapana on January 07, 2005, 07:43 AM | #

If the left is based in conflict ideology (which I think it is), then it makes total sense that they use every real or imagined dialectic to their ultimate advantage.  It just seems all too familiar, this taunting of Jewish students. Who uses phrases that mean nothing to anyone? Why ridicule a Russian Jewish student over current Israeli policies or Zionist politics? What purpose can it serve when that Jewish student has about the same say over Sharon as I have over Bush Jr. ?

So, why (and who) train leftist parrots to shout anti-Zionist slurs at randomly passing Jews?  (Especially since Israel actually practices a form of communism?) Perhaps the answer lies in the “police in riot gear.” What if racism has little or nothing to do with the targeted “races” who bear the brunt of the conflicts? Random acts of violence against a specific group of people are never really that random, are they? What if the average Jews, Israelis, Americans, Canadians, Mexicans, Palestinians, leftists and Republicans, et. al. are all pawns in the path toward an international government? It’s no secret that the left uses conflicts, chaos, and riots to advance their agenda. All conflicts create an “urgent need” for the U.S. to expand itself into a totalitarian, neither-right-nor-left, more democratic (and more moral) world police state.

I was quite unprepared for racism to be such an important topic here… but it is obviously an area I need to study much more in depth. I still don’t know how it ties into my world-view. I’ve read several published works by superior White Race advocates, by superior Jewish Race advocates, by superior Arabs and Muslims, etc, and I’m sorry, but it all reads the same to me after a while. It reminds me of how many Americans have told me how “stupid” Americans are, yet they NEVER include themselves in that group. Yes, they are American, they’ll admit, but somehow they’re all better and brighter than all the rest of the faceless stoopid people who aren’t in the room, right there, present and able to defend themselves reasonably.

I’ll continue to read the eugenic’s arguments, even though my anti-thesis includes the science of eugenics and the roles of Leonard Darwin and Gifford Pinchot. I’ll keep trying, because to me, racial and religious conflicts all serve to further the synthesis, no matter what “side” starts or promotes it.  It just bothers me that blood is shed by so many of the poorest members of each “tribe.” Every tribe seems to be willing to sacrifice a few of its lessor members for the common good. When I read Barry Chamish’s review of Israel’s “100,000 Radiations” last fall, I had the same reaction I had when I read what Cambodians did to each other in the 70s. This is the sickening truth about racism and promoting hate. I understand the frustration with open immigration, I agree it is part of a huge problem, and secessionists have existed since the Boston Brahmins started drinking tea again. The thing is, America is not “white” anymore. Many of our white children have already intermaried with people from many “exotic” races. They’re family now. What is their fate if we tear our country apart based on racial differences? Does not our just law protect every individual?

We already know brothers will go to war against brothers. Is there any race of people who won’t kill each other, or spy and turn neighbors over to the Gestapo? What superior race can prove it is above acting out a genocidal policy against “lessor” or “wrong thinking” members in its own tribe?

Is it possible that the biggest obstacle to the NWO is that the American people might find a way to overcome their differences and fight together, as brothers who share the same individual rights, against their common enemy called communitarianism?

What if the American people figure out that their unique and historical Bill of Rights can defeat their same formidable enemy, again, using the same logic they used 230 years ago, and this time, they can do it without ever firing anything but all newly appointed communitarian public officials? Our union still has 270 million members, if we ever stood together we’d almost have bargaining power to restore our republic. Can genuine racial divisions (based on science, religion or whatever) lead to anything that even resembles our lives under the Bill of Rights? Whatever their merits, and they both seem to have some basis for their arguments, it appears to me that racial conflicts and secession mainly serves to assist the globalists to achieve their “vision.”

At lunch today a co-worker told me some native islanders in the areas hit by the tidal wave shot arrows at “rescue” aircraft attempting to come “help” them? I’d sure like to live to to see that kind of courage among all my “smartest” countrymen.

Posted by Pericles on January 07, 2005, 08:42 AM | #

Hi Niki,

Google “North Sentinelese” or see Steve Sailer’s site, where I got this http://www.expressen.se/index.jsp?a=226344

By the way, loved your yurt. It’s got me thinking.

Pericles

Posted by Guessedworker on January 07, 2005, 01:21 PM | #

Niki,

Race very clearly is a big thing here, it being the principle passion of the marxian-left and the principle point of pressure in the US and Europe.

Men, it’s said, are more territorial and group conscious than women.  They are certainly more aggressive and your “stand together” banner won’t cause many to fall in line - at least, not the ones on this blog!

I think also that you are coming at the race issue from the wrong direction in speaking of supremacy.  That’s a total strawman.  Sovereignty is the issue, necessitated by the onrush of demographic change and by the depredations of the left.

White peoples will, in the not too distant future, have three choices available to them:-

1. Acquiesce in their own dispossession and deracination,
2. Attempt to ameliorate the situation politically,
3. Attempt to resolve the issue completely through conflict.

As of now one wouldn’t bet one’s shirt on nos. 2 or 3.  However, it is precisely nos. 2 or 3 that mesh with your anti-communitarian agenda?  White particularism is the antithesis of the global agenda.  The two cannot co-exist.  A community of post-nations held together by civic values cannot survive a recrudescent white racial awareness founded on real loyalties.

Posted by ben tillman on January 10, 2005, 07:42 PM | #

This a rather ham-handed example of bait-and switch.  Aimed at the indoctrinated and indoctrinable Freeper, the article promises a discussion of anti-Republican leftist invective but delivers a diatribe against anti-Jewish speech.  It is common to see Freepers refer to anti-Semitism as a “leftist” phenomenon, and indeed the purpose of screeds like this is to falsely insinuate an identity of interests between Jews and “conservatives”.  In reality, of course, it is difficult to imagine anything more fundamentally conservative than opposition to tikkun olam, the Jewish community’s efforts to fix that which, from our perspective, ain’t broke.
 
Of course, efforts at social re-engineering may have unintended consequences, and it is encouraging to receive reports of the sort of incidents Ms. Stillwell focuses on.  The phenomenon is most ably discussed here:

http://home.ddc.net/ygg/cwar/stranglv.htm