Tough decisions for Brits to make

Posted by Guest Blogger on Monday, 18 May 2009 22:45.

It’s just the beginning for the good men and women who will vote for the BNP for the first time in the upcoming European elections. After that, they have a lot to think about. What will make up their minds for nationalism?

by David Hamilton

There is a relentless and deadly war being conducted against the people of Britain. That realisation is what distinguishes the mere protest voter from the committed BNP supporter.

So ... where did it begin, this war on our blood?

The ruling-class changed after the Second World War. They became obsessed with an ideology that calls for sensitivity towards the Third World. The previous posture of “white man on top” was discarded. The humiliation over Suez put the lid on it. It was not the loss of the canal but the sheer incompetent debacle of it all that showed us up as being weak and no longer one of the top nations.

The ruling-class had introduced minorities into several countries for commercial reasons. They introduced Tamils into Sri Lanka (then Ceylon) for rubber. This has saddled the Singalese with a vicious minority. They spoke a different language and had a different religion from the natives. It was similar in Malaya were the ruling-class introduced Chinese, then Tamils. In Guyana they introduced Indians. There had to be laws introduced to protect the Malays. That happened, too, in Fiji where the ruling-class imported Indians to cut sugar cane.

In the Malaya of 50 years ago little more than half of the population was Malay. The ethnic differences showed themselves in the Malays’ lack of commercial mindedness while the Chinese flourished commercially and pushed the Malays out. The symptoms of discord were already evident in the early part of last century as the Chinese gravitated to the cities, while the Malays lived in the country.

As early as 1940 the famous politician of the old elite class, the diarist Henry “Chips” Channon, had remarked on the moral failings of the rulers. There was appeasement of the Nazis in the 30s and appeasement of immigrants since the 50s. There was a perceived need for a larger body to shelter behind. The League of Nations was seen as a vehicle for morality and this replaced the quest for power and self-interest. The dainty British rulers renounced the balance of power for the moral superiority of the League. The plan to disarm as much as possible when we were the most powerful nation was enshrined in the Covenant of the League. Since the Second War it was the Commonwealth, then the EU, and ultimately it will be World Government to look after the interests of these poor tender things.

Of our interests they care nothing.

There was racial conflict from the beginning of mass immigration in the UK. But the elites have avoided having to face it by making us the scapegoats. If they blame someone else like ordinary British people they don’t have to face their own inadequacy. In 1948 between 31 July and 2 August in Liverpool, in Deptford on the 18th July; and Birmingham between the 6th and 8th of August 1949 but the idealists ignored them as they had in 1919 when after the racial battles in Liverpool and Cardiff Lord Milner wrote in a Memorandum of June 23rd, On the Repatriation of Coloured Men: ”I have every reason to fear, that when we get these men back to their own colonies they might be tempted to revenge themselves on the white minorities there…” Milner’s comments on Britain in Egypt are telling: “It is a force making for the triumph of the simplest ideas of honesty, humanity, and justice… If Egyptian prosperity is a British interest so is Egyptian independence.”

In 1955 Conservative MP Cyril Osborne tried to introduce a Bill to control immigration but was not successful. The Spectator of 4th February 1955 commented: “This will save the Government the duty of facing the facts.”

There were no records of numbers of immigrants entering, apparently because as Commonwealth citizens British subjects, nor did they give practical support, leaving it to local councils and voluntary organizations. There were many representations from local councils to the Government and slum clearance was held back yet immigration was under constant and secret discussion at Cabinet level but apart from Churchill’s attempt to have a Bill for controls drawn up but having to retire because of his health, no other could take decisive action.

Not only did we fail to keep power by being the centre of the Commonwealth but we even adopted a cringing pose to them. Only Britain allowed just anyone to enter. In 1953, Oliver Lyttleton (later Lord Chandos) had a list of all restrictions imposed on Britons by other Commonwealth countries who refused to accept “persons who are likely to become a public charge,” illiterates”, those deemed “undesirable” had “unsuitable standards or habits of life” many had quota systems and even dictation tests. Jamaica prohibited those likely “to become a charge on public funds by reason of infirmity of body or mind or ill-health or who is not in possession of sufficient means to support himself or such of his dependants as he shall bring with him to the island”. Thirty–nine territories had entry permit systems or required prospective residents to first obtain permission.

In his opus Eminent Churchillians, Andrew Roberts reports that Commonwealth Secretary Earl Home, worried himself that we should not give the impression that Commonwealth citizens from India, Pakistan and Ceylon would be less favourably treated than those from the Dominions, otherwise there could be “retaliation”. Roberts other private interviews show the personal and moral degradation of the rulers in the 1950s. For example, a Minister closely involved in the decision-making process: “we were just stalling and hoping for the best.” One of Mr. Churchill’s private secretaries: “at that time it seemed a very good idea to get bus conductors and stuff.” A junior minister: “it was becoming hard to find somebody to carry your bags at the station.”

In 1958 senior police officers dismissed the Notting Hill race battle as “... ruffians, both coloured and white, out for hooliganism.” However, the files show that there were mobs of 300 to 400 shouting “Keep Britain White” who were counter- attacked by large mobs of “youths of colour.”

The Notting Hill Riots in 1958

The ruling elite were pretending they could manage race relations better than the Americans who were locked in racial conflict. There were comparisons of Notting Hill with Little Rock, Arkansas.

This was the beginning, then. Not some happy experiment in a new future of diversity, but an injustice delivered upon the British people by their own weak and morally debilitated rulers.

People are realising now that the main parties, the media, academics and corporations are not their representatives but enemies promoting policies that are destroying them; that far from representing us, they are at war with us, and treat us as the enemy. They and those who still believe them effect moral superiority, while we are lectured on our wickedness because we object to our communities being destroyed by being used as dumping ground for immigrants. The Ideological Caste themselves have two homes in posh areas or beautiful village. The recent revelations of their expenses scams has disgusted the whole nation.

We are ruled by ideological correctness and Modern sin is not wrong behaviour but wrong thinking and those who err are publicly persecuted and subject to public humiliation. They are self-righteous and think they are special while others are ignorant sinners (racists, sexists and homophobes) like religious folk and use fear-mongering to control the population and like missionaries want to convert people. Those who demur are pushed out. Churchill was in the wilderness by the establishment who were appeasers for years even during a national crisis and Enoch was sacked from the Shadow Cabinet; for writing about “Enoch being right” prospective Halesowen Conservative candidate Nigel Hastilow had to stand down and prior to this local councillor Ken Turner claimed he had been refused the candidature because he is not Black! One of the worlds’ leading scientists James Watson was removed from his post and even the late Jade Goody, who was one-quarter black, was persecuted, as was the half-Iranian on Alan Sugar’s “The Apprentice.” Comedians are also displaced to stop them influencing the public. Hughie Greene, Jim Davidson and the very popular Benny Hill had his TV programme dropped. The “right” sort of people like Ben Elton and Lenny Henry are promoted.

When it comes to different ethnic groups otherwise rational people become sentimental and weak. It’s like a woman on seeing a baby or child talking to its pet. When immigration is mooted they are unmanned by girlie sentimentality that has allowed us to welcome invaders as people coming to improve our culture and look after our sick and elderly.

It is like a family writ large. Sometimes one is despised and does not get the care that makes one feel worthy. I knew of an elder girl who was not favoured but the young one and son (middle) were. The remarks made by her mother were harmful to a woman - critical of he appearance which left her a depressive. When some are fostered there is a danger that the parents will give more attention to them leaving their own out and thus making them feel less worthy. This is what is causing immoral behaviour and giving up amongst our working class young.

We are having a false identity put on us and are internalising the negativity. For example, what is “racist” about wanting our own communities? What is racist about keeping jobs and homes for our own children? That is our duty but our corrupt elites are dispersing our children’s natural birthright among the ethnics they are bringing in. In an age when the authorities are trying to feminise young men through sensitivity training, recall the wise words of general George S. Patton:

“All men are afraid in battle. The coward is the one who lets his fear overcome his sense of duty. Duty is the essence of manhood.”

I listened to the debate at the Radio Academy of Nick Griffin and Abu Hamza. One particularly pompous journo asked Griffin: “Don’t you think people should be treated equally?” They don’t treat us equally! The position of the “caste” is of assumptions - they never have to justify it but we are effectively put on media trial. I suppose they justify discriminating against us by telling themselves they are righting wrongs, redressing the balance, by showing us in a bad light and the ethnics as always competent and worthy. They habitually describe them as intelligent. We don’t talk about white people like this. We don’t say, “Charles Murray the intelligent social scientist.” But they do of blacks, and people start to wonder why it has to be emphasised?

The rulers have thrown in the towel and accepted that there is nothing they can do to stop immigrants taking over our homeland apart from keeping us passified. It was stated by a former television employee in the Birmingham Post that we must be prepared for when immigrants become a majority. Former Swedish PM Jens Orback stated Swedes must be nice to Muslims so they will be nice to us when they take over. To see where this fawning attitude gets us just consider that the Muslim terrorists are the grandchildren of people our elites praised. If they “slipped up” in their restaurants by serving kitekat, perhaps, it must be assumed that they don’t know any better, but we will enculturate them and they will become exactly like us. But they don’t become like us. Instead there are threats of violence and domination hanging over us.

But why would anyone assume Moslems will treat us well? They are human beings like us, and just as likely to treat us badly as our elites treated them under the Empire. In fact, many quotes from preachers and from inside the mosques make it clear what they intend to do to our children. For our elites to leave our children to be bullied and persecuted by the new Muslim rulers because they owe us for history shows what evil people they are. Meanwhile television is telling us to feel sympathy for immigrants and how ill-used they have been. They boost others up but put us down. The neglect is psychological. We are increasingly left out of advertising as “diversity” takes over. The “typical” family unit is routinely portrayed as a black male dressed in best domestic chic with a smitten white woman in his arms and two photogenic mixed-race muppets completing the picture. Female beauty tends more and more to be idealised in mixed-race women. These are the images which we are told represent us and our future. It is the future we have to find the determination and energy to reject.

I think that our elites despise our blood and genuinely believe our culture to be so powerful and successful that the newcomers will imitate us. The unrecognised implication is that they are inferior. When they apply to open a Mosque the authorities think it is something harmless, like the local church. To aid them in dealing with the chaos they are creating they hide in the comforting illusion that Islam is “a religion of peace.” But underneath the rulers are capitulating, betraying us to an enemy who will visit vengeance on our next generations for wrongs committed by our same rulers who invaded their homelands and bombed their women and children!

There is a pretence that the Muslims against us are a tiny minority. But it’s not a half-a-dozen chaps who happen to bump into each other fortuitously and think “Oh, lets make a protest!” They all share the same goal of Muslim domination. They create a barrier themselves, and show it by their dress. The authorities cannot intellectually process the planting of a bomb. Politicians, professional therapists and reporters and to the bombers’ neighbours, ask a few leading questions and presto ... we are told how much the poor dismembered fellows had integrated ... how they loved fish and chips .. if only they had not been corrupted by “preachers of hate”. Reality is kept out of the media because they don’t want us to react as we did in Luton, even though the police originally took the side of Muslims who insulted our troops.

The elites are afraid to listen to other opinions and face the harsh reality, this now leading to anti-Semitism as the main problem is, oil. What sort of people make themselves and their people dependent on other countries? Weak, emasculated and inadequate people, that’s who!

It is an inward collapse from a loss of confidence and self-respect. The young have no sense of cultural legacy, but know which other groups are “wronged” and who to apologise to. As long as the state controls education and parents abdicate their responsibilities this decline will continue. We have to face up to the fact that we are letting them do this to us. Would asylum seekers take the risks to get here if they were not so privileged?

This obsession with immigrants is grievously misplaced, and we should be shoring our own people up. Rulers are paralysed by fear of immigrants but pretend it is some great virtue - tolerance, absence of prejudice, we are all coming together in the brotherhood of man! There is a complete failure to treat immigrants as fellow human beings: its as if they catch an airplane and leave their ways behind like shedding an old skin. Now I ask you, gentle reader, what sort of mentality is that?

When the ideologues discuss how they see the immigration developing they never give examples but cite people they know or sports personalities. When we cite examples like Luton they do not show us where we are wrong nor even disagree, but attack us with abuse. That is because they are afraid of reality. They need to stop us speaking as it frightens them. There is no attempt to be honest as they have closed minds. It was as if we became their enemy and they went about converting us or breaking us down.

Now the orthodoxy is breaking down and we face the chaos or totalitarian shoring-up measures, we must ask ourselves some important questions. What sort of people are we? What future are we leaving for our next generations? In twenty years what will our children and grandchildren have? “People will not look forward to posterity”, Burke wrote, “who never look backward to their ancestors”.

We have a duty to our children and their children as they in turn will have to theirs. We have a debt to our ancestors we bequeath this to us and must honour that. The honouring is in preserving what they left to us and the duty is in passing it on .

Make no mistake the situation created by corrupt and decadent elites over the past 60 years is a tragedy for all of us but we have to face it and deal with it, not let it run on as the Establishment desires. These evil people have left us this horrible choice just to import cheap labour for themselves and global corporations. We are now faced with the fact that many of us have friends, colleagues and even relations from different ethnic groups, but we have to be strong about this. And ask ourselves can we allow our people to be pushed out of jobs and given unfair competition for homes and college places because we know some? We must remember General Paton and put our duty to our children and grandchildren first. Look at statistics from ONS, which don’t take into account the births to mothers born here. Then look at your children and ask “am I betraying them? Where will they live and work?” We have tough decisions to make, like the Italians:-

Berlusconi claimed the left had “opened the doors” to clandestine migrants. “So the left’s idea was, and is, that of a multi-ethnic Italy,” he said. “Our idea is not like that.”

… and the Japanese:-

Thousands of Latin American guest workers in Japan have been offered a pay package to return home. The repatriation plan is part of a wider government effort to stem rising unemployment. Workers will receive 3,000 US dollars for their air fare, and 2,000 US dollars for each dependent. Critics have condemned the programme as ‘short sighted and inhumane.’ In March Japan’s exports plunged to a 25-year low, having a knock-on effect on manufacturing and consequently unemployment. Japan hopes the departure of foreign workers will ease the domestic labour market. So far at least 100 workers and their families have agreed to leave, according to Japanese officials. The workers are descendants of Japanese emigrants who left for Brazil and Peru a century ago. They were issued special work visas in the 1990s when Japan was facing a labour shortage.

Let’s hope we have the moral constitution now to take those decisions and to undo the treacherous deeds of the cowards of the past.

Tags: British Politics

Comments:

Posted by skeptical on Tue, 19 May 2009 03:10 | #

That Berlusconi quote is choice. It’s amazing to me that any Western politician could get away with saying something like that nowadays.

Now, I know that Berlusconi is, in his own away, just another corrupt, cynical politician. Still, I find his repudiation of a “multi-ethnic Italy” rather impressive.

Posted by GR on Tue, 19 May 2009 03:25 | #

I believe his position is genuine. As corrupt as he undoubtedly is, he’s much earthier than most other heads of state, so his gut reaction to “Little Africas” springing up in his country is the same as that of the folk who are being replaced, and crammed into (often “mafia”-built) ghettos meanwhile. Also, racism in Italy hinges on the football firms—and Italians are as everyone knows wild about their bloody football. I’d say racism is alive & well in Italy. Unfortunately Italy is a smoldering trash-heap which, when uncovered (as the EU sometimes does in token gestures, as to poke at the Calabrese mafia trafficking in African migrants), releases a noxious gas reminding the importunate snoop that some rotting heaps are best left unturned.

On the other hand, I believe that if we were to see anti-immigrant rioting in Europe elsewhere than Germany, it would result from some incident involving Italian hooligans and the police force.

Posted by skeptical on Tue, 19 May 2009 04:16 | #

GR,

On the other hand, I believe that if we were to see anti-immigrant rioting in Europe elsewhere than Germany, it would result from some incident involving Italian hooligans and the police force.

Well, someone will have to lead the way.

I get the sense that if some form of nationalism were to overtake just one European country than the rest would fall like dominos (some quicker than others obviously). There’s real hope for the old world, I find myself routinely reading about political events in Europe that could never happen anywhere in North America (i.e. the phenomena of the BNP for starters).

Unfortunately, the sun is about to set on those of us in the new world. This generation will probably see the U.S. and Canada breakup into smaller nation states sometime before 2050. It will take at least several generations to pick up the pieces of what the Left has done to us, if it ever happens. I can’t help but feel that our destiny on the North American continent is to play out one of history’s most spectacular tragedies.

Posted by GR on Tue, 19 May 2009 04:45 | #

There’s real hope for the old world,

I don’t believe that. And I don’t believe rioting will trigger a domino effect. Just saying, if it’s going to happen anywhere, I’d put my money on Italy. The only “real hope” exists in the breast of the white nationalist himself. Europeans, deprived of their immigrant neighbors, would do what they do best: being bourgeois, going to nightclubs, skiing, beating each other up at football games and having sex in their cars. Some few millions of Germans and French would continue the pretense of high culture, but no one would care. I don’t say that’s an undesirable thing, simply that it isn’t very interesting and, in this miraculous scenario, I’m not sure it deserves to be hoped for.

I can’t help but feel that our destiny on the North American continent is to play out one of history’s most spectacular tragedies.

“Destiny” gives the impression that it’s still to come. We’re living it now. Positing the breakup of two great nation-states holds out hope of interesting developments containing assumed political possibilities for us; I don’t think there’s anything about the present status of either state to warrant such speculation. The important thing is: we’re living it now. Right now, we’re living the tragedy. It isn’t to come. And it won’t “get better”.

Then again .... given enough booze, I can see packs of Englishmun rediscovering their balls and putting their boots in the right place, if even for a few nights. Funny though that this shit has to depend on booze and football. To see the reconstruction of real nationalism on European soil, I’ve always said one would have to first totally abolish football.

Posted by GR on Tue, 19 May 2009 04:58 | #

Oh, funny thing about Luton. About four months ago I was refused entry to the UK at the Luton airport coming from Paris—- by a Sikh immigration officer who’d been harassing Americans in the queue, as I observed long before my turn. He didn’t like that I had no money in my pockets. And was convinced I was there to sexually abuse my Scottish girlfriend who, by that time, was frantically paging me on the intercom from the waiting area. I was placed in a holding cell overnight with two extremely tired or drunk Spaniards (or Poles, I couldn’t figure it out) and posters of Woody from Toy Story. Treated very well by the English security guards, and trying to mentally reconstruct Henry Miller’s “Via Dieppe-Newhaven”, which recounts a similar course of events. And lest I consider hanging myself—and how could anyone avoid such thoughts with a four-foot Woody staring down at them as they munch on the free raisins and granola bar, while watching highlights of the history of Great Britain on the television!—they took my belt and bootlaces ...

Posted by Fred Scrooby on Tue, 19 May 2009 05:07 | #

”Dolan read the epistle in Spanish and pledged himself to Spanish-speakers in their language during his homily. The prayer of the faithful was offered in seven other languages ranging from Irish to Igbo, spoken in Nigeria.”

Too bad no one projectile-vomited all over Dolan. Spanish was bad enough but how anybody could keep their lunch down when he got to Igbo is beyond me.

http://www.vdare.com/letters/tl_051809.htm

Posted by GR on Tue, 19 May 2009 05:16 | #

Ah why are (Irish) Catholics such god-awful faggots.

Posted by Ak474u on Tue, 19 May 2009 06:23 | #

Ah, why are some MR (GR) posters such pestiferous swine? You have nothing to say that any white man is obligated to respect yet you continue to post the most trifling nonsense for your own juvenile simian entertainment. Shoo away, little gnat.

Posted by tc on Tue, 19 May 2009 06:40 | #

It is the milieu of “culture”, that it lands them - and every other provincial…

Posted by Valerian on Tue, 19 May 2009 07:04 | #

Skeptical:

GR,

“On the other hand, I believe that if we were to see anti-immigrant rioting in Europe elsewhere than Germany, it would result from some incident involving Italian hooligans and the police force.

Well, someone will have to lead the way.

I believe the dissolution of the United States was something that was bound to happen, even from the inception of this country’s history. As a country, the United States lacks the Traditions and the “collective experience” that European nations have. We’re a fairly new country compared to our mother nations and Americans are spread out on a giant land mass and are farther away from each other then the Germans, French, Italians, etc. are to each other. The fact is is that the Jews exploited the situation to their advantage and now America is a distorted, Solid-less mass that will split apart as a logical necessity from it’s own Nature.

Posted by Al Ross on Tue, 19 May 2009 10:22 | #

Ak474u has certainly got the measure of this ‘GR’ poster, thus dashing my hopes of the latter’s being the long awaited reincarnation of wintermute. Alas, I shall have to recalibrate my expectations.

Posted by Al Ross on Tue, 19 May 2009 11:31 | #

There is a very short distance (especially by South Asian standards) between Jaffna Tamil, Northern Ceylon and Tamil Nadu. The Dravidian Tamil presence in Ceylon long predates even the earliest European colonial presence. Here’s an approximate timeline : The Portuguese ran the island from circa 1500 to 1650. The Dutch oversaw it from approximately 1650 to 1800 and the British were the colonial masters from around 1800 until 1950.

That intelligent innovation, viz,. the passport, wasn’t one of the scurvy subcontinent’s inventions but, since the comparatively recent racial disestablishment of the United States, the outsourcing of the making of American passports will doubtless become a successful Indian venture.

Posted by Al Ross on Tue, 19 May 2009 13:25 | #

With regard to the situation, in Malaysia, of the Malays, it has become a hackneyed cliche that, historically, the Chinese beat the Malays to the commercial punch, hoovering up all the business opportunities which the British merchant and agency companies left untapped.

This is not reflective of historical reality. Sadly, the Malays displayed little interest in building businesses; almost as little they did in the avoidance of mass Indian and Chinese immigration by their disdainful refusal to toil in foreign - owned plantations and mines, thus necessitating the foreign influx in the first place.

The truth is that the Malay preferred a rural life of independence to that of becoming a unit of indentured labour - and who can blame him?

Anyway,the successful operation of businesses is a high average IQ race’s plight and the Overseas Chinese fall into that category. The Malays do not.

Posted by GR on Tue, 19 May 2009 13:45 | #

Shoo away, little gnat.

Another angry Soren groupie.

Posted by DRS on Tue, 19 May 2009 14:31 | #

Another angry Soren groupie.

I take it that your disdane of nationalism has something to do with your love of international travel?

Shoo away selfish coward.

Posted by Jupiter on Tue, 19 May 2009 14:39 | #

Picking up the pieces after the aftermath of course means exterminating the left out of existence.

Posted by DRS on Tue, 19 May 2009 18:13 | #

Picking up the pieces after the aftermath of course means exterminating the left out of existence.

As someone who does street level activism in the UK, and has had one or two slanging matches with dogma spewing lefty-bots I must say that sounds like fun.

Posted by a Finn on Tue, 19 May 2009 18:53 | #

In Britain and elsewhere in the West they are using certain policies of Machiavelli (probably not recommendable to click the Abika -links in the document):

http:/www.rosenoire.org/archives/Machiavelli,_Niccolo_-_The_Prince.pdf

... and much more they are using these modern sociological manipulation techniques. After reading this, it is easy to understand why e.g. U.S. constitution and other important things became subverted. This book should be renamed to Manipulation handbook:

http://www.amazon.com/Social-Construction-Reality-Sociology-Knowledge/dp/0385058985

Posted by Bill on Tue, 19 May 2009 20:45 | #

GW commented in entry ‘Who Is It That Is Instigating Techno-Genocide Against the American H-1b’s?’ on 05/19/09, 04:37 PM.

“I can say that in England, certainly, we are galloping towards a revolution with no ideological foundation - just a great need to “do it”. The result will be a noisy outpouring of nativism, not nationalism, with not a single thought given to whether nativism has any staying power, or whether the surviving liberal foundations of our social being will corrupt it. Everybody here knows where I stand on that. They will.”

GW. Things are moving at a frenetic pace, but in what direction?

I’m behind the curve on this expense-fest thing, what’s it all about? Is this the Banker’s revenge, this’ll teach you to mess with us? In short, Pay-back time for the media/politician’s Nazi show trial a few weeks ago?

The media is pouring fuel on the flames but keeping its distance at the same time - canny. Nothing to do with us gov.

Where do the Telegraph figure in all of this? Why should they want to rock the boat?

So many questions - too few pointers.

Help!

Posted by Matra on Tue, 19 May 2009 20:49 | #

Now, I know that Berlusconi is, in his own away, just another corrupt, cynical politician. Still, I find his repudiation of a “multi-ethnic Italy” rather impressive.

Speaking of Silvio Berlusconi.

Illegal immigration crackdown in Italy:

The new law would mean a 10.000 euro fine for illegal immigrants and a prison sentence of up to three years for those who shelter them.

... As part of its crackdown, Italy has also started sending back boatloads of migrants to Libya, without first checking for asylum claims.

The UN, the Vatican and human rights organisations say this is in breach of international law.

OK, it is only illegal immigration but it is a start. What I like most is there don’t appear to be any ‘integrationist’ features to the bill:

Aside from the center-left opposition, the security bill has also drawn criticism from the Catholic Church and organizations like Save the Children, both of which are concerned over provisions regarding children and the classification of illegal immigration as a crime.

In a statement issued after Wednesday’s votes, the Italian Bishops Conference (CEI) complained that the government’s bill did not address the question of integrating immigrants into Italian society.

‘‘This is a major issue about which there has been total silence,’’ observed Father Gianromano Gnesotto, head of CEI’s office for immigrants.

The new bill, he added, ‘‘goes in the opposite direction of a society which seeks to be integrated’‘.

According to Father Gnesotto, the bill fails to deal with the needs to ‘‘protect family unity, allow family reunions and safeguard minors’‘.

Link

Valerian: Unfortunately, the sun is about to set on those of us in the new world.

North American immigration reformers/restrictionists have long advocated integrationism and held up previous waves of European immigrants as a success. No wonder there is little hope in the New World.

Posted by Bruno Telegra Jr. on Wed, 20 May 2009 10:45 | #

I can’t help but feel that our destiny on the North American continent is to play out one of history’s most spectacular tragedies.

Bah. The United States was built upon a house of sand (Economism and Radical Egalitarianism to be more precise) Let it fall as an example of the harm caused by those false premises.

American ‘Civilization’ by Baron Julius Evola

In place of ‘America’ there exists the notion of ‘Radical Localism’ and that is probably be the shape of things after it all shakes out after the Collapse. Northwest Imperative!

Posted by Guessedworker on Wed, 20 May 2009 11:00 | #

Bill,

I’m writing a post at this moment on the Westminster imbroglio and the rise of the BNP, and will post it today.

Posted by WHITE AUSTRALIA on Wed, 20 May 2009 11:10 | #

There was once a time when Whites were unabashedly pro-White - http://strangemaps.wordpress.com/2009/05/05/380-white-fright-asia-looming-over-anglo-australia/

Posted by Bill on Wed, 20 May 2009 11:26 | #

Thanks GW for your 10.00am above.

I shot this over to the DT. (not very often these days) @ 10.52 am 20 May 2009. ‘I don’t believe it.’

Speaker Michael Martin’s downfall: Only the start of a very British revolution

“This hysterical establishment manufactured outburst about political corruption, greed and clubbyness, is nothing but a shallow sideshow of distraction.

There’s a whole herd of elephants trumpeting in this article.

“The public has now decided it is time for change:”

Rubbish! This was not a British public led revolt, quiet or otherwise. It was the establishment’s Telegraph who kicked this whole thing off, if it had kept it’s mouth shut, we, the public would have been none the wiser.

Gorbal Mick would still be there, and the Great British public would still be contentedly grazing on pig flu, day-time television and Jordan’s chest.

Time for a change you say. You forgot to include change we can believe in, now where have I heard that before?

Change to what? Cameron, you must be joking. I’m choking on my credit crunch - do me a favour.

Come on Telegraph, tell us, the real reason why you opened up this can of worms?

IMO, I think under the universal tenets of liberalism, governance of any description is no longer possible without dictatorial powers.

In other words, we are being offered a choice of freedom like the songbird in a gilded cage. In other words, what freedom?

We don’t know where any of this is going to end up. We’ve never been here before.”

Posted by Guessedworker on Wed, 20 May 2009 12:15 | #

Bill,

Thusfar I have managed to scribble this:-

Desperate measures: turning on one’s own, the anti-fascist option and the resurrection of UKIP

”Revolutions do not happen in this country, but every now and then the public gives a great heave of boredom and impatience, and something is done with forever.”

These words of the American literary critic Edmund Wilson, writing of Britain in April 1940, contain the explanation to a modern media mystery: why did the Telegraph play Pandora, and launch its ruthless two-week offensive against the political class?

“Radical reform of discredited Commons system” and ”many MPs will be suspended from Labour over expenses” scream the headlines. This is a political earthquake. Why would a party to every level of the Establishment like the Telegraph unleash it?

Well, let’s rewind a little. The Labour MP Sir Stuart Bell confirmed to the BBC in March that the expense claims of all 655 MPs had been “liberated” by some likely lad, and were being offered around Fleet Street for £300,000.

My theory is that the Telegraph had three reasons to grab the CD and run with it, and only one reason not to do so. It is wrapped up in Edmund Wilson’s words.

Posted by Bill on Wed, 20 May 2009 12:52 | #

GW You’re a genius. My thoughts are far too disparate to make any sense. All I know is that my brain keeps telling me none of what’s happening here (and elsewhere) adds up.

The BNP are getting a good kicking but they’re hanging in there. They sense (and see) it’s not as the MSM are telling it.

You know, many moons ago, I posted on CIF (I think? Yes it was c2006 ish) That the 2010 election would be the last elections of its kind. (and that Cameron would not last the first term). The general tone of the post being things were imploding (the train crash in slow motion)

The post sailed by, attracting no attention. I was amazed at the naivety of most, if not all of the comments @ that time. It was the same to-day @ DT. Unbelievable.

I’m fresh out of predictions, like the fly on the wall, I’m reduced to a spectator.

GW. I don’t know where you get your energy or the time to pursue this vast subject, don’t overdo it, keep your powder dry.

Look forward as ever.

Posted by Guessedworker on Wed, 20 May 2009 13:29 | #

I don’t know where you get your energy or the time to pursue this vast subject

Through great laziness in every other department of my life, I shouldn’t wonder.

I have meetings this afternoon, so the piece won’t be completed until tonight. Hope it lives up to your expectations, Bill.

Posted by skeptical on Wed, 20 May 2009 18:13 | #

Bah. The United States was built upon a house of sand (Economism and Radical Egalitarianism to be more precise) Let it fall as an example of the harm caused by those false premises.

American ‘Civilization’ by Baron Julius Evola

In place of ‘America’ there exists the notion of ‘Radical Localism’ and that is probably be the shape of things after it all shakes out after the Collapse. Northwest Imperative!

An oversimplification.

The U.S. is a very complicated place with many different undercurrents, the matter isn’t helped by the fact that nearly the whole of American history is written in lies and obfuscation. American elites have been using various historical narratives as political weapons since colonial times, untangling the truth from this wretched heap is a mighty undertaking even for natives. That is why Evola, as an Italian, can only begin to scratch the surface of what we truly are. Granted, he was able to penetrate some of the deeper meanings behind America’s international hegemony (and the forces it promoted in Europe) but that would be all.

Perhaps it is this natural dishonesty that explains the unrivaled success of modern liberalism in the Anglosphere.

Posted by Gasoline on Thu, 21 May 2009 00:19 | #

The elites mindlessly moved around people for the sake of profit and greed. They did not care for nothing. They made and divided countries (Belgium and Nagas of India and Burma for example) with no concern about the people on the ground. Thanks to them the Caribbean has become an outpost of Africa. But in the past they had more or less left Britain and Europe alone. But after 1950 that taboo collapsed too.

Comments:

Post a comment:

Existential Issues

DNA Nations

Categories

Contributors

Links

MR Central & News

Comments