Treachery and the Barcelona Process

Posted by Guest Blogger on Monday, 30 March 2009 22:26.

By David Hamilton

The media are part of the ideological caste and, unless they are brave or honourable, keep “sensitive” issues from the public or present them in a way favourable to the elites. The highest sensitivity is reserved for race, then gender and sexual orientation.  The EU promotes this ideology. The news reporting is managed, and EU and UN schemes to discriminate against whites are kept from the public. People cannot revolt against something if they do not know it is happening. So what is really happening?

Throughout Europe there is a developing war on the streets for possession of the continent.  This is mainly aimed at us European people but anti-Semitism is coming back too.

British Muslims are not only burrowing into our institutions and undermining them from within, they are beginning a war in the UK AND they are fighting against our troops in Afghanistan.  EU rulers know this but still encourage immigration to build up their numbers.

How realistic is the New World Order: or is Globalisation beneficial?  In an outstanding article of 30 Jan 2009,  Patrick J.Buchanan talked of the Globalist fantasy and what is really happening:-

In Europe, populist anti-immigrant parties, alarmed at a loss of national identities, are striding toward respectability and power. The Vlaams Belang, seeking independence for Flanders, is the biggest party in the Belgian parliament. The Peoples Party and Freedom Party are now Austria’s second and third most popular. The Swiss People’s Party of Christoph Blocher is the largest in Bern. In France, the National Front humiliated the government this week, winning over half the vote in a suburb of Marseilles.

All are unabashedly ethnonationalist. Writes British diplomat Sir Christopher Meyer, “It is useless to say that nationalism and ethnic tribalism have no place in the international relations of the 21st century.”

The fact that the banking system is breaking down and America breaking up is reality. The reality is caught either from personal experience of living in areas being colonised by imported ethic groups and from understanding human nature.  These events are reported piece meal in the media and you have to “read between the lines” and see how trends and movements are developing.

Recently in Luton some local Muslims protested against the homecoming from Iraq of local regiment The Royal Anglians or “The Poachers”. The English fought back but the police protected the Muslims and the only arrest was a young Englishman (the CPS later dropped the charges). The most fitting protest came, in fact, when a young black female spat at the Luton Taliban!

The organiser of the Taliban protest is financed by the state, as preachers who advocated war on us like Abu Hamza were.  Mullah Ishtiaq Alamgir receives £1000s in benefits and lives in a £200,000 house.  A march to”Respect our Troops planned for the 28th of March in Luton has been banned by the political police.

The dog is being wagged by the tail: ethnic minority groups are changing our policies by threats.  To prevent Geert Wilders speaking at the House of Lords recently Muslim peer Lord Ahmed threatened to bring 10, 000 Muslim protesters outside the Lords.  These everyday skirmishes are caused by the alliance between Western elites and militant Muslims at the highest levels.


The British elites submitted to Saudi when they abandoned the bribery investigation into the arms deal between Saudi Arabia and BAE systems because of an explicit threat made by the Saudi authorities that, if the case continued, “British lives on British streets” would be at risk, as explained by Britain’s former ambassador to Saudi Arabia, Sir Sherard Cowper-Coles. These are the controllers of terror groups in the West that Brown and other politicians are colluding with against the general public!

Brown and Business Secretary Lord Mandelson visited Saudi Arabia and the Gulf states to ask them to fund Western economies by putting billions into the International Monetary Fund, last November.  In return they offered them some leeway in the affairs of Britain and the West. The Saudi regime is the motor behind Islamisation of the West. Saudi’s Wahhabi form of Islam is making Islam dominant in many areas of the world. Saudi’s have financed the spread of Wahhabi mosques, preachers and educational institutions in this country, promoting holy war and converting thousands of weak and susceptible Britons to their faith.

Barclays Bank, has had almost £6 billion invested from Abu Dhabi and Qatar. Brown is to make London the global centre of Islamic banking and Britain’s major banks are accepting Sharia finance but Sharia is a project for Islamising society that prohibits interest. Alaister Darling, Chancellor of the Exchequer, actually advocates Sharia finance.

One of the ways in which Islamist ideas are spread is through Islamic study centres attached to our universities. Professor Anthony Glees revealed eight universities - including Oxford and Cambridge – which have accepted more than £233.5 million from Saudi and Muslim sources since 1995, spreading radicalism and creating two separate identities and sets of allegiance.

The Saudi monarchy are building The Oxford Centre for Islamic Studies (OCIS), founded in 1985, Prince Charles is its honorary patron. It is the biggest Muslim educational centre in the United Kingdom and has been built as a traditional Oxford college around a central cloistered quadrangle. The 10,230 sq m four-storey building will feature study and research facilities, a lecture theatre, a large library, an environmentally controlled archive for rare documents, and a prayer hall with traditional dome and minaret tower. The centre includes a 108-foot-high minaret and a 75-foot-high dome. It is estimated at £65 million.

Evidence of “The Barcelona” Process only came to light when a folder containing details was reported in Danish national newspapers after an immigrant postal worker in Allerød thought it was “racist” and refused to deliver it.  Nyhedsavisen of 2 June 2007, reported: “A postal worker was sent home on Friday because he had attached a personal comment to an Islam critical folder he was to deliver in the town of Allerød.  His colleagues called a strike, but at a meeting Saturday morning called it off.”

Benita Ferrero Waldner, European Commissioner for External Relations and European Neighborhood Policy, informed a selected media representatives from across Europe”:-

“The Freedom of expression is central to the values and traditions of Europe. But its preservation depends on responsible behaviors by individuals. By extension, we do not believe the media should be regulated from outside, but rather that you find ways to regulate yourselves.  In considering the question of self-regulation, I would also ask you to think about the need for monitoring from within your own professional bodies. I am convinced that will have a significant impact.”

Then:-

“We will identify a nucleus of journalists and analysts around which to develop a structured, sustainable system of information exchange and publication focused on North-South understanding.”
Euromed & The Media (pdf) September 2005
See also - Benita Ferrero-Waldner - Intercultural dialogue: the media’s role Speech/06/321

And then she said:-

“Europeans know from bitter experience the gravity of the threat racism and xenophobia represent. Indeed, the European Union was born out of the cataclysm of intolerance that engulfed twentieth-century Europe.  Our task has been ... minimising hatred and maximising reason. And today the European Union stands as a testimony to Europe’s religious, linguistic and cultural diversity. We are a community of values, united by our diversity and our determination to prevent such a threat from overwhelming us again.

That is not to deny there are problems in Europe. Racism and xenophobia stem from fear of the unknown, of the different, and in uncertain times they are never far from the surface. That is why we have set up the Monitoring Centre and why we are continually fighting for equality and tolerance.”

Does she think Muslims are free of intolerance? Does she think they are the perfected New Man.

This fighting of the last war while allowing the next one to develop shows how stupid these ideologues are. They always select a group as the main enemy and allege them to be the proponent of some social crime.  Today, the crime is “hatred” and the selected group is us whites!

Muslims don’t need much encouragement to see us as haters and xenophobes.  They already dehumanise us as “Infidels”so that killing us can be seen as holy.  The murder of Englishman Ken Bigley in Iraq, by having his throat hacked through to the spinal column, was like the Halal method of animal slaughter.  That is what they think of us.

Benita Ferrero-Waldner, in that previous quote, refers to stereotyping people, then proceeds to describe “Europeans” in negative stereotypes.

I always groan when people use the politically correct “isms” devised by those that seek to destroy us.  It shows that those people have no character, do not think for themselves and have been programmed by the media. They talk like robots: “racism” ... “fascist” ... “hate speech” … the totalitarian words meant to stop not only debate but people thinking.  How overworked is such a recent word as “Islamaphobia”?

The destruction of Western Europe is taking place through mass immigration, of which the principle component is Islamic infiltration.  Only a small minority of the Muslim community is involved in street fighting but the entire community wishes to see the green flag of Islam fly triumphantly over the capital cities of Europe. Islam is also a cultural movement and it does not belong in Europe.

The World Culture Forum Alliance, founded by the Ford Foundation, is linked to the Council on Foreign Relations and the CIA, as well as the EU, the European Council and UNESCO.  They have admitted that they are using propaganda and withholding certain news to manage and control us.

The Anna Lindh Foundation, was founded by the Arab League, the EU, European Council, and UNESCO.  Traugott Schöfthaler, head of the Anna Lindh Foundation:-

“We will arrange giant Muslim Youth Festivals - like the ‘Images of The Middle East’, which lasted 6 weeks in 2006 in Denmark.”  ‘We will tackle stereotypes and prejudices and ignorance and change the daily ‘news journalism’ to portray every-day life of ordinary people, which can create identification and fascination – and intercultural understanding. We will tackle our stereotypic images of people from foreign cultures and make new experiments with pictures in public places, in the media, and advertising.

And we will have common projects with people from other cultures. We will develop the intercultural skills of journalists, school pupils and artists and exchange people from these groups with (Muslim) colleagues. We will manage art and cultural productions. We will train the school teachers and influence their education to be multicultural.

And we will influence the curricula of the schools to become multicultural by means of revision of existing textbooks and educational materials.”

As we know in practice they are freeing Muslim street soldiers to wage ethnic war against us on our own streets, while using the usual social engineering techniques to break our resistance!  It should be noted that these social engineering techniques were studied in Russia, of all places, when the Audio Visual Observatory of the European Council held a Symposium in Moscow in 2005.

EU leaders made a contract with the leaders of countries surrounding the Mediterranean in 1995 to ensure mass immigration from North Africa into the EU. A deal that will destroy our civilizations in Western Europe.  This becomes effective in 2010 and has been kept from the European people whose lives, ways and children’s future are to be destroyed. Some excerpts will show what we are not being told.

The Barcelona Euro-Mediterranean Declaration of 1995 was agreed by the EU, Morocco, Algeria, Tunisia, Egypt, Jordan, the Palestinian Authority, Syria, Lebanon, Turkey and Israel and comprises: Comprehensive political partnership and establishing a free trade area and economic integration to beginning in 2010.

The EU intends to force its subject peoples to respect Islam, which means prosecuting any who oppose the EU-sponsored invasion.  Multiculturalism is to be submitted to promote tolerance between different ethnic groups in Europe.  In practice, Europeans have to do this.  It is simple oppression.  But the other groups are encouraged in separate development and given preferential treatment.  The ideology stresses the importance of a resolute common campaign against racism, xenophobia and intolerance but only for us.  Mutual European and Muslim influence on radio, television, newspapers and magazines to socially-engineer cultural understanding.  The EU will promote these mutual influences.  A Youth exchange programme is to bring about co-operation between future Euro-Mediterranean generation (the Barcelona declaration adopted at the Euro-Mediterranean Conference 27-28/11/95).

Thus the European peoples are being managed through an inculcated shame, and manipulated by social engineering.  European religion and European culture is being devalued ready for the implementation of Islamic mores.

The Populations of the nine Muslim Countries will be given free movement of goods, services, capital and people into Europe in return for political and economic changes. Association agreements have been made with all partner countries except Syria ( 28.11.2003 account of Euro Mediterranean Foreign Minister Conference in Naples held on 2-3.12.2003).
Negotiations for Turkish EU entrance began in 2005.

Less than a month after 9/11 the EU rulers again surrendered us to Islam:-

The ministers declined as both dangerous and unfounded any connection between terror and the Arab and Muslim world. In this context the importance of the Barcelona Process was emphasized by everybody as a suitable and recognized instrument to promote a dialogue between equal partners and civilizations.  The ministers agreed to work on deepening the on-going dialogue between the cultures and civilizations, especially wanting to direct attention towards youth, education, and the media.
Account from the 5.-6.10.2001- Euro-Mediterranean Foreign Conference in Brussels.

The European Union and the European Council plan to destroy our Identity:

Cultural policy must avoid the popular distinction between them and us, even mentioning the other , as this opens the gate for imposing collective identity on the individual.

They ignore reality like bomb attacks in London and Madrid for the romantic dream of a universal Utopia.

The Speech by the head of the Danish Center for Culture and Development (CKD) - run by the Danish Foreign Ministry - on the 13.05.2005 in Rabat). Olaf Gerlach Hansens speech in Rabat, Morocco 13. June 2005.  In this he refers negatively to Samuel S. Huntington’s “Clash of Civilisations” thesis.

The EU have made cooperation agreements with the Islamic Educational, Scientific, and Cultural Organization, which aims – according to article 5a of its charter – to spread Muslim ways of thinking and living in the entire world. Charter of the Islamic Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization – ISESCO.  Their watchword:-

When limitless continental democracies and cooperative assemblies are possible global democracy is just around the corner.

Our politicians can not face the reality of widespread war with Islam throughout Europe and pretend we and Islam have shared goals. Margaret Beckett, then, Secretary of State for Foreign Affairs, told Danish newspaper Jyllands-Posten on the July 7 2006:-

“Our obligation to the values that mean most to us – freedom, tolerance and justice – has grown even stronger and deeper since the London bombs. So has our relationship with the Islamic world, which also shares our common ideals, today.”

This high-minded, moral superiority is a cover for fear.

David Miliband is another evil man, calculating that the destruction of European people is worth the cost to Jews like himself of introducing Muslim anti-Semitism.

The EU grants free movement to Muslims from nine countries into Europe.  This will change our demography and destroy our ancient European cultures, religions and our identies, submerging us in Islamic identity in a few years.  Muslim birth rates are three times those of Europeans, and they alone threaten the survival of European people and European culture, without the fresh importations that are planned.

Our politicians import Islam precisely to destroy us because they need to destroy our nation states for the purposes of their own globalism, for the New World Order.  They may be men and women of no great intellect.  But the world has seen no greater treachery.



Comments:


1

Posted by Fred Scrooby on Tue, 31 Mar 2009 02:37 | #

Good article.  It has to be grasped that, as this article points out, race-replacement of white people is happening by careful plan.  Behind the scenes are individuals actually planning the extinction of the white race, and they are getting the funding to enable them to carry out their plan, realize their dream.  The funding comes from individuals like David Rockefeller, George Soros, Warren Buffet, Ted Turner, and Bill Gates, and from organizations like the U.N., UNESCO, and the Ford Foundation.


2

Posted by Armor on Tue, 31 Mar 2009 03:34 | #

The EU intends to force its subject peoples to respect Islam, which means prosecuting any who oppose the EU-sponsored invasion. (—DH)

The invasion is sponsored by the European governements too, not just by the EU. Anyway, it’s better to import Muslims than Mexican Catholics. It will cause more confrontation!

Our politicians import Islam precisely to destroy us because they need to destroy our nation states for the purposes of their own globalism, for the New World Order.

I think most of them don’t know what they are doing. The word sheeple is a cross between sheep and people. I wish there was a similar word for politicians: something like sheepliticians.
Most politicians play no role in setting the agenda. A much bigger role is played by the media owners, the advisers, the financial contributors, the bureaucrats…


3

Posted by Armor on Tue, 31 Mar 2009 03:38 | #

“A much bigger role is played by the media owners, the advisers, the financial contributors, the bureaucrats…” (—Me)

...and also by individuals like David Rockefeller, George Soros, Warren Buffet, Ted Turner, and Bill Gates, and organizations like the U.N., UNESCO, and the Ford Foundation…


4

Posted by Wandrin on Tue, 31 Mar 2009 05:09 | #

David Miliband is another evil man, calculating that the destruction of European people is worth the cost to Jews like himself of introducing Muslim anti-Semitism.

Evil definitely but I don’t think they calculated this aspect. My belief is they were and are completely fixated on us, fixated on turning us into minorities so there could be no second Hitler, and because of that they never considered that their imported pawns might one day develop an independent agenda of their own, especially one that was hostile to Jews. I think they expected their imported invaders to do their dirty work for them against native Europeans and then settle down quietly to be the their tame proletariat. Reading around around blogs and the MSM nowadays you can see that some of them are waking up to what they’ve done but I imagine it will take some major atrocities before the majority do.


5

Posted by Fred Scrooby on Tue, 31 Mar 2009 14:35 | #

“I don’t think they calculated this aspect.”  (—Wandrin)

 

The core of Jews pushing race-replacement, the ones you never see or hear from, the ones who stay well out of sight, have “calculated this aspect” (the aspect that in their eagerness to rid the world of homogeneous Euro populations they are creating additional “anti-Semitic” Moslem populations.  They’ve calculated it, but they deem anti-Jewish Moslem populations less of a threat than homogeneous Euro populations so they want the replacement process to proceed. 

A Jewish thinker like Steven Steinlight or one like Lawrence Auster doesn’t see it that way.  Auster sees it as a no-brainer that replacing Europeans in continental Europe with imported Moslems from Turkey, North Africa, and the Near and Middle East, and replacing Britons with Moslems from the Middle East and the Subcontinent is bad but Auster isn’t at the controls, other Jews are, and the ones at the controls disaree with him.  They see it as good. 

How do we know they see it as good?  Because they refuse to stop pushing it.  Look at a Jewish newspaper like the Jew York Times:  after all this time, with all that’s going on in the U.S., in Europe, and in the world, they’re still pushing as hard as they can for race-replacement of whites.  That’s no “accident” or innocent “oversight” because they’re not blind.  They have eyes.  It’s just that they love what they see with those eyes.  Since we hate what we see we suppose they must have no eyes, or they’d stop pushing it.  We suppose wrong. 

“My belief is they were and are completely fixated on us, fixated on turning us into minorities so there could be no second Hitler, and because of that they never considered that their imported pawns might one day develop an independent agenda of their own, especially one that was hostile to Jews.”

They’ve considered it and have found it less of a threat than they find us.  Again, these are the behind-the-scenes Jews who are running things mainly by means of throwing money around.  They’re buying what they want, and they want Arabo/Maghrebo/Subcon/Islam in place of Eurochristianity.  We see sane Jews like Auster who have zero power; we never see these others, only their effects on immigration policy, hate-speech policy, and so on, slowly bringing the Euroless world they desire into existence.  They want Euros phased out and are buying what they want by buying Eurosphere politics (plus other tactics having to do with forging alliances with greedy Euro élites like the Bush family, with anti-Euro non-whites galore, and with various Euro malcontent groups such as women’s libbers and so on).


6

Posted by Fred Scrooby on Tue, 31 Mar 2009 15:08 | #

“We see sane Jews like Auster”

I should have said, “Among the Jews we see are sane ones like Auster” — we see plenty of insane ones of course.  But my point is there’s a core of Eurochristian-hating ones we never see, who sit at the controls and pull the levers of power.  Those Jews prefer Moslems to Eurochristians or even to Europostchristians.  They don’t want Euro racial homogeneity anywhere.  How do we know?  By the methodical and extremely agressive way they’re going about stamping it out.

They’ve considered the alternative to Euros.  They like what they see.


7

Posted by Glyn Roach on Wed, 01 Apr 2009 01:26 | #

“... there’s a core of Eurochristian-hating ones we never see, who sit at the controls and pull the levers of power.  ”  If you never see then you re imagining them, Fred.  Please cite some evidence as your fantasy is not sufficient.


8

Posted by Fred Scrooby on Wed, 01 Apr 2009 01:59 | #

Yes I’m deducing that they’re there.  The Tsar didn’t know the reason he was being gunned down along with his family and retainers was New York Jews anonymously funding Trotsky and the other Jews running the Bolsheviks.  All he saw in front of him when the first hail of bullets flew were slovenly vulgar Bolshevik pigs pulling triggers.  Those shabby pigs were there firing bullets because of wealthy men at the controls in New York.  For years and years no one understood why Carl Pope, head of the Sierra Club, not only never breathed a word about open borders’ harmful effects on all manner of environmental concerns, but wasn’t allowing anyone in that organization to breathe a word about it either.  Big, big, big, mystery.  Then someone spilled the beans:  a single Jewish billionaire, I forget his name at the moment, had come to Carl Pope, plunked down a hundred million dollars in front of him — that’s the amount, a hundred million dollars — with the words, Here’s a hundred million for your organization but if you ever breathe so much as a word critical of open borders immigration, if you even so much as think thoughts critical of it, you won’t get a cent!  Carl Pope heard and obeyed.  So that one Jew was the reason the premier environmental-protection and advocacy organization in the Western World never protested open borders and never permitted any of its members to do so.  Mystery solved:  cherchez le juif!  So yeah, I look around and I deduce the obvious, Glyn.  Do you have a better explanation of why Euros everywhere are rushing headlong to their doom?  You think they’re doing it themselves, entirely on their own?  Something in the air is making them do it?  A miasma?  Post-modern liberalism?  Managerialism?  What’s your explanation?  Populations don’t auto-genocide themselves, Glyn.


9

Posted by Fred Scrooby on Wed, 01 Apr 2009 02:04 | #

The Jews fund 80% of the Dem Party and 50% of the GOP.  Jews don’t pay for closed borders, Glyn.


10

Posted by Fred Scrooby on Wed, 01 Apr 2009 02:06 | #

I just vaguely remembered Glyn Roach is an asshole.  I shouldn’t have replied.


11

Posted by Mentious on Wed, 01 Apr 2009 06:36 | #

No, it was a great reply and worth reading. I had not heard about the Jewish controller of the Sierra Club. The reference to the Bolshevik revolution and the secret money powers behind that is also instructive.


12

Posted by Jan on Wed, 01 Apr 2009 12:49 | #

http://www.brasschecktv.com/page/585.html


13

Posted by Fred Scrooby on Wed, 01 Apr 2009 13:11 | #

“I had not heard about the Jewish controller of the Sierra Club.”  (—Mentious)

I just looked it up:  his name is David Gelbaum:

http://www.vdare.com/walker/050202_sierra.htm

This is just one instance of what goes on behind the scenes, a process hidden but enormous in scope, to re-shape our world to the delight of Jews and the horror of Euros.

As for the New York Jewish billionaires who financed the Bolsheviks, you can look that up anywhere.  Trotsky actually came to New York and had meetings with them preparatory to returning to Russia with arrangements for the funds.  I just the other day posted something here from Steve Sailer showing how a Jewish banker in Sweden was instrumental in “laundering” Russian gold stolen by the Jewish Bolsheviks and sending it back to them in laundered form to be used to solidify their position during the revolution’s early years (we’ve all heard about stolen Nazi gold, right?  Of course!  How would Steven Spielberg and Elie Wiesel ever let us forget!  Well, the Nazis weren’t a patch on the Jewish Bolsheviks and their Jewish allies abroad where stealing the property of others was concerned).


14

Posted by Fred Scrooby on Wed, 01 Apr 2009 13:41 | #

See here on Bolshevik gold, the stolen gold Steven Spielberg will never, ever make a movie about, Elie Wiesel will never, ever write a book about, and World Jewry will never, ever indignantly demand restitution for:

http://majorityrights.com/index.php/weblog/comments/progress_by_pesach/#c71845 .

See here on Olof Aschberg’s ethnicity:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Olof_Aschberg .

The main New York Jewish banker funding the Bolsheviks was Jacob Schiff, whom you can look up anywhere.  There were others doing it with him, of course, in New York and elsewhere. 

The Russian Revolution was a Jewish revolution, the first modern instance where Jews overthrew Euros in a country and took over.  We all saw the 70-year-long result:  an unmitigated horror of totalitarian economic and social insanity and Jewish ethnic payback against Euros for two thousand years of real and imagined torment. 

Jews cannot rule Euros.  We in the States are being ruled by Jews right now, which is why everything is going straight to hell.


15

Posted by Tanstaafl on Wed, 01 Apr 2009 19:23 | #

It may help to understand that while most jews consider their people’s time amongst Europeans as a long line of undeserved atrocities visited upon them, many also have fond memories of their coexistence with muslims.


16

Posted by Big Silver on Wed, 01 Apr 2009 20:56 | #

Populations don’t auto-genocide themselves, Glyn.

Then explain racial change throughout the ages. 

People move around the globe.  When they get there, they breed.  That even explains half the “Euros” you’re talking about.


17

Posted by Guessedworker on Wed, 01 Apr 2009 21:07 | #

Silver,

You are losing it.  Your argumentation is growing more and more ridiculous.  You know perfectly well, for example, that the Third World hasn’t “moved” to our lands on its own account.  It’s migration is a tool used against us by the political and corporate class and by one ethnic interest group.  We are under an obligation to our children resist.  We have the moral right to resist.  So we resist.

Really, if you spent a little time uncovering the motives for your own contrarianism you would help yourself immensely.

We are RIGHT.  You are wrong.  What do you expect?  That we just agree to go quietly away as a people, muttering the inanities of political correctness.


18

Posted by Glyn Roach on Wed, 01 Apr 2009 22:00 | #

Fred, I might be an asshole, in fact I’m naive but you are coward who hides behind a screen name.  You chicken! I challenge you to post under your real name, coward.


19

Posted by danielj on Wed, 01 Apr 2009 22:26 | #

See here on Bolshevik gold, the stolen gold Steven Spielberg will never, ever make a movie about, Elie Wiesel will never, ever write a book about, and World Jewry will never, ever indignantly demand restitution for:

Didn’t Steve Sailer do an article about this recently? Anybody have a link?

The main New York Jewish banker funding the Bolsheviks was Jacob Schiff, whom you can look up anywhere.  There were others doing it with him, of course, in New York and elsewhere.

In predictably Jewish fashion, he funded the Jews in Russia since funding Japan’s victory over Russia and instigating the ‘05 Revolution didn’t do enough damage.


20

Posted by Wandrin on Wed, 01 Apr 2009 22:59 | #

@Fred Scrooby

They’ve considered the alternative to Euros.  They like what they see.

My quibble is with the idea that’s there’s one monolithic “they”. There may be a “they” in terms of always doing what they think is best for their tribe but I don’t think they neccessarily always agree on what the best thing is.

In my reading round the blogosphere I’ve come across Jewish sites that very positively described the position of Jews in the Turkish empire as favoured dhimmis. I could certainly imagine people who’d convinced themselves this was the best path to tong-term security being completely ok with, or even happy at, the thought of white extinction. I agree that this group would fit your quote.

However I also think there’s other groups as well.

I think there’ll be a group who doesn’t want to be forever pulling strings behind the scenes. They have been a kind of favoured dhimmi in the west for a long time with a great deal of power and influence but that power always had to be shadowy because they were a small minority among a homogenous majority. By promoting mass immigration they weaken the majority and gradually create countries made up of a collection of minorities that they can play off against each other. I don’t think this group is deliberately genocidal. I think they want to rule out in the open with an endless chain of President Cohens. I don’t think they’d want to swap a homogenous white majority for a homogenous black, hispanic or muslim majority, they want a collection of minorities.

There’ll be another group who, whatever their view of what they’d like to happen in the western nations, see the long-term best interest of Jews in the continued existence and strength of Israel and would trade anything else for that.

Lastly I think there’s a group who have taken the idea of the multi-cult on board completely and believe the best interest of Jews is the death of all ethnically homogenous nations - including Israel.

Why does any of this matter? Muslim attacks on Jews are increasing across Europe. The multi-cult Left is following the muslim agenda and becoming increasingly anti-Israel and increasingly anti-Jewish. Muslim immigrants all get themselves Arab satellite channels to keep their kids away from western influences - satellite channels full of revised history that gets passed into the mainstream through work and the playground. I don’t believe they calculated for this turn of events. If they did it’s a very suicidal kind of plan. I think they were so focused on defeating us once and for all they simply didn’t consider threats coming from any other direction.

So if you put these two things together: conflicting Jewish factions and a suprise threat from an unconsidered direction then what do you get? I believe that if muslim anti-Jewish attacks become increasingly hard to ignore then some of the above groups will think Israel is the problem and that if they sacrifice Israel then the muslims will calm down and go back to being a pawn that Jews can use to attack white people with in Europe and America. However the pro-Israel group will be totally opposed to sacrificing Israel. That conflict will be total and uncompromising and in that conflict, if it happens, there’ll be Nationalist opportunities.


21

Posted by Glyn Roach on Thu, 02 Apr 2009 03:40 | #

Wandrin, at last some realism and intelligence.  I don’t dispute the influence of Jewish oligarchs on Western affairs but they are losing their influence and being supplanted by A Muslim hegemony and a submissive Western Socialist-Marxist elite who are making them powerful in our countries.  America and Israel are the last Jewish strongholds as Muslims take over Europe.
The story of the Syrian millionaire donating to the Tory party and the US pulling out of Durban II should give some clues.


22

Posted by Wandrin on Thu, 02 Apr 2009 04:28 | #

@Glyn Roach

To me it is like a man trapped in a room with a scorpion and a gorilla. It may have been the scorpion that let the gorilla in but if the man gets angry about that and goes after the scorpion while ignoring the gorilla then he’ll get crushed. On the other hand if he ignores the scorpion and goes after the gorilla then he’ll get stung. The man needs to get both of them out of his room and he needs to use every bit of sense and consider every possible tactic to do so.

Tactics > everything.


23

Posted by Guessedworker on Thu, 02 Apr 2009 09:27 | #

Muslims have no cultural power in the West that has not been granted them by governments - including energy wealth.  They come from low-IQ populations with a high incidence of the faith gene.  Their power is numerical, which is also their utility to Jews interested in killing the European and, specifically, European Christian world.

Nationalist governments in power in Europe could remove Muslims from the West within five years if they took a hard line - outlawing halal, oulawing circumcision, outlawing the hijab and chador, paying welfare in countries of origin and not in our countries, even banning the religion, if necessary.

I’m hoping that the BNP concentrates on Muslims partly because its primary Labour-voting constituency can see them everywhere, and partly because it is morally unable to criticise the sainted Jews.  The existence of Jewish members of the party is probably unavoidable at present.  But even so, the jury is out as far as I am concerned.  Of course, the day there is a BNP Friends of Israel we’ll know they are useless to us.


24

Posted by Glyn Roach on Thu, 02 Apr 2009 10:56 | #

There is a serious consideration that Jews are losing their power.  They were trying to re-race Europe and made great progress in the US but have brought a more dangerous enemy into what they controlled. They promoted multi-racialism but underrated Muslims nd how much hatred they had generated for themselves over Palastine - they have made a big mistake and they are realising. 
In fact apart from Whites almost the entire world is anti-Jewish now.  You can buy “The Protocols” in Muslim shops all over England, for example.  That is why the sharper Jews like the Front Page crew or Lem Phillips are now opposing Islam in the West.  The “white” elites are weak and decadent and allowed them to take over as they now surrender us to Muslims and of course massive finance from such as Saudi.  What we have to do as a pre-requisite to fighting back is keep up with things and not get left behind like White Nationalists.  Though, I accept that it is different in North America from Europe as we are literally at war with Muslims as we speak.


25

Posted by Guessedworker on Thu, 02 Apr 2009 11:31 | #

Glyn, how many British nationalists comprehend that, by focussing solely on Muslims, they are being used, and used up, by the powerful?


26

Posted by Desmond Jones on Thu, 02 Apr 2009 20:42 | #

My Daddy always used to say better a chicken than a turkey.


Blacks, Sikhs and Hindus also have no power in the West other than that given them. Yet it is Islam with which the West is at war. And to think Carlyle, in his dissertation, the Hero as a Prophet, felt he could speak honestly of Mohammet because we would never be them. There is more to Islam than a Faith gene ( a non-peer reviewed assertion from the same “scientist” that gave us the Gay gene). Islam is all that stands against the Judeo-Leviathan, in Europe certainly. Nationalist governments will not face down Islam because they fear their altruism driven not only by their religion but also their consanguineous nature. Banishing Wilders from Albion is evidence of their fear.

A white Muslim stood as a BNP candidate not that long ago.

The candidate is Steve Bilton, 48, a supply teacher, who is standing as a prospective councillor in St Michael’s ward.

He said he converted to Islam three years ago and joined the BNP a few months ago. He denied that the BNP was a racist party.

“The BNP is a secular party,” a spokesman said.

“We are a political party for white European people. If a white person is a Muslim, they can be in our party.”

The BNP has more changes than a chameleon.


27

Posted by Guessedworker on Thu, 02 Apr 2009 21:16 | #

Altruism is only problematic because we are self-estranged.  If we could be brought to know ourselves once again as the Victorians knew us, all aggressivity against us would be visible and possible to extinguish.


28

Posted by Desmond Jones on Thu, 02 Apr 2009 21:40 | #

The Victorians…the Victorians had no sense of us…“we” were the the white Negro…

‘The negro’, observed Edwin Hood, ‘is in Jamaica as the costermonger is in Whitechapel; he is very likely often nearly a savage with the mind of a child.’ The liberal Saturday Review suggested that ‘the negro is neither ferociously cruel nor habitually malignant. He often does cruel and barbarous things, but then so do our draymen and hackney-coachmen and grooms and farm servants, through want of either thought or power of thinking.’


29

Posted by Glyn Roach on Fri, 03 Apr 2009 05:38 | #

What is this vague assumption"the all powerful” meant to represent? I thought the Saudis had most money, now. The problem with positing a secret enemy pulling the strings is it becomes obsessive and out of touch with reality this usual tactic of referring to events of a 100 years ago proves nothing.  A 100 years ago we were the most powerful nation in the world. Now look at us. What does mean something is this week a Syrian millionaire was found to funding the Tories.  Or does it not matter because he is from a low IQ area?


30

Posted by Guessedworker on Fri, 03 Apr 2009 09:44 | #

Well, obviously, Glyn, you do not get the hegelian properties of the conflict between the BNP and the Muslims, and the desired “synthesis” of the global security state:-

http://majorityrights.com/index.php/weblog/comments/the_horizontally_totalitarian_future_world/

Look, an intelligent reader of our situation should conclude that the anti-Muslim strategy reduces the English people to the level of an ethnic tool.  No different to blacks and Muslims.  It is not a threat to the Establishment, visible and invisible, for the English and the Muslims to be at each other’s throats.  It is an opportunity, a stepping stone - and one that was not fashioned by accident.

Now, OK, electoral politics has to address the mass of people whose vision is limited to what they see outside their front door.  But away from the leafletting and PR work, in the places reserved for mature reflection, the party has to devise strategies to avoid serving others’ aims.  They have to find some place in their planning to target the real power centre.  It is not Muslims.  It is not “the old gang” parties.  It is not Saudis or Syrians.  It is Jewish at the very highest levels and substantially WASP below, and spreads out to envelope the political and corporate classes throughout the Western world.  It’s name is finance capitalism, and it power centres are Washington, New York and London.

We are being robbed of our peoplehood and of homeland by this infernal machine, not by ignorant Muslims sticking their arses in the air five times a day in Dewsbury and Burnley.


31

Posted by . on Fri, 03 Apr 2009 12:45 | #

Posted by Guessedworker on April 03, 2009, 08:44 AM | #

We are being robbed of our peoplehood and of homeland by this infernal machine, not by ignorant Muslims sticking their arses in the air five times a day in Dewsbury and Burnley.

Not to mention names but better in there Ignorance there sticking there assess in the air 5 times a day than in there Wisdom sticking there Assess up Everyone 24-7 times a day!!!


32

Posted by Glyn Roach on Fri, 03 Apr 2009 13:55 | #

The bombs planted by Muslims were an act of war.  You pretend this did not happen or did Mossad plant them?  What has a long-dead philosophical systematiser to do with Jewish influence?  You suggest that we apply his theories to a real-life situation which is how Marxists think: forcing people into an ideology. You need to study philosopht properly as you are muddled.
I understand your reluctance to face reality by pretending invisible Jews are behind everything because bigger men than you are frightened to face this.  But remember, if this does go off with Muslims in Europe you will be seen as a traitor and you know what that means.


33

Posted by Fred Scrooby on Fri, 03 Apr 2009 14:04 | #

Glyn Roach belongs in one of these “hospitals” where they do chemical lobotomies on people.  Either that or he’s just newly emerged from one.


34

Posted by SM on Fri, 03 Apr 2009 15:26 | #

Posted by Glyn Roach on April 03, 2009, 12:55 PM | #

The bombs planted by Muslims were an act of war.  You pretend this did not happen or did Mossad plant them?  What has a long-dead philosophical systematiser to do with Jewish influence?  You suggest that we apply his theories to a real-life situation which is how Marxists think: forcing people into an ideology. You need to study philosopht properly as you are muddled.

He just explained that muslims being around, ABLE to plant bombs is a symptom. Where were you?

I understand your reluctance to face reality by pretending invisible Jews are behind everything because bigger men than you are frightened to face this.

The american media, law, activism, financing machine is “invisible”?

The ties between america and the anglo west are invisible.

That doesn’t even start to address any homegrown(to where-ever) jew apparati.

The recorded history of jewish revolutionary activism is invisible?

But remember, if this does go off with Muslims in Europe you will be seen as a traitor and you know what that means.

Golly gee, GW I think you have just been tricked into conformity to liberalism…

By an Irishmen of all things! LOL

Glyn, you sure you ain’t from North Carolina?...

=============


35

Posted by John on Fri, 03 Apr 2009 16:20 | #

The bombs planted by Muslims were an act of war.  You pretend this did not happen or did Mossad plant them?  What has a long-dead philosophical systematiser to do with Jewish influence?  You suggest that we apply his theories to a real-life situation which is how Marxists think: forcing people into an ideology. You need to study philosopht properly as you are muddled.
I understand your reluctance to face reality by pretending invisible Jews are behind everything because bigger men than you are frightened to face this.  But remember, if this does go off with Muslims in Europe you will be seen as a traitor and you know what that means.

The Trojans are the problem. Not the horse.


36

Posted by Bill on Fri, 03 Apr 2009 22:04 | #

Red squirrels could die out in ten years, says Prince Charles

At the launch of a charity to protect the native species, Prince Charles warned that the red squirrel could be extinct in the UK within ten years.

I can’t think of a caption for this!  Something like, nice to see he’s gotten his priorities right.

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-1167089/Red-squirrels-die-years-says-Prince-Charles.html


37

Posted by Wandrin on Sat, 04 Apr 2009 03:24 | #

The Trojans are the problem. Not the horse.

In the rougher parts of many British towns and cities muslims are actively ethnically cleansing while the state, police and media look the other way - muslims are a clear and very present existential danger. If a man in Birmingham is being attacked by a muslim with a knife there’s no point telling him not to defend himself because a jew in London was ultimately responsible for bringing that muslim to the country. He has to deal with the threat in front of him. The Trojans are the root of the problem. They created the problem. But the problem they created has a separate existence now and can’t be ignored.

Obviously there’s a risk that the Trojans get forgotten about in the conflict.


38

Posted by Mick Lately on Wed, 16 Jan 2013 16:23 | #

Several places, I read what she said:

EU foreign policy chief Catherine Ashton called on Friday for “accelerated international engagement”...

...in Mali.

Was reading the following last night (in conjunction with this and other pieces on MR):

TOO: Muslims decide the French election



Post a comment:


Name: (required)

Email: (required but not displayed)

URL: (optional)

Note: You should copy your comment to the clipboard or paste it somewhere before submitting it, so that it will not be lost if the session times out.

Remember me


Next entry: What is always with us?
Previous entry: Intellectualism and opportunity cost, Part 1

image of the day

Existential Issues

DNA Nations

Categories

Contributors

Each author's name links to a list of all articles posted by the writer.

Links

Endorsement not implied.

Immigration

Islamist Threat

Anti-white Media Networks

Audio/Video

Crime

Economics

Education

General

Historical Re-Evaluation

Controlled Opposition

Nationalist Political Parties

Science

Europeans in Africa

Of Note

Comments

Guessedworker commented in entry 'Soren Renner Is Dead' on Thu, 28 Mar 2024 16:55. (View)

Guessedworker commented in entry 'Moscow's Bataclan' on Thu, 28 Mar 2024 16:38. (View)

Thorn commented in entry 'Moscow's Bataclan' on Thu, 28 Mar 2024 14:36. (View)

Guessedworker commented in entry 'Moscow's Bataclan' on Thu, 28 Mar 2024 12:50. (View)

Thorn commented in entry 'Moscow's Bataclan' on Thu, 28 Mar 2024 10:26. (View)

Al Ross commented in entry 'Moscow's Bataclan' on Thu, 28 Mar 2024 05:37. (View)

Thorn commented in entry 'Moscow's Bataclan' on Tue, 26 Mar 2024 15:07. (View)

Thorn commented in entry 'Moscow's Bataclan' on Tue, 26 Mar 2024 11:00. (View)

Al Ross commented in entry 'Moscow's Bataclan' on Tue, 26 Mar 2024 05:02. (View)

Thorn commented in entry 'Moscow's Bataclan' on Mon, 25 Mar 2024 11:39. (View)

Al Ross commented in entry 'Out of foundation and into the mind-body problem, part four' on Mon, 25 Mar 2024 09:56. (View)

Al Ross commented in entry 'Moscow's Bataclan' on Mon, 25 Mar 2024 07:51. (View)

Al Ross commented in entry 'Moscow's Bataclan' on Mon, 25 Mar 2024 07:46. (View)

Al Ross commented in entry 'Moscow's Bataclan' on Mon, 25 Mar 2024 07:41. (View)

Thorn commented in entry 'Moscow's Bataclan' on Sun, 24 Mar 2024 12:25. (View)

Guessedworker commented in entry 'Moscow's Bataclan' on Sun, 24 Mar 2024 00:42. (View)

Thorn commented in entry 'Moscow's Bataclan' on Sat, 23 Mar 2024 22:01. (View)

Thorn commented in entry 'Moscow's Bataclan' on Sat, 23 Mar 2024 21:20. (View)

Guessedworker commented in entry 'Moscow's Bataclan' on Sat, 23 Mar 2024 20:51. (View)

Guessedworker commented in entry 'Moscow's Bataclan' on Sat, 23 Mar 2024 20:45. (View)

Thorn commented in entry 'Moscow's Bataclan' on Sat, 23 Mar 2024 17:26. (View)

Manc commented in entry 'Moscow's Bataclan' on Sat, 23 Mar 2024 15:56. (View)

Thorn commented in entry 'Moscow's Bataclan' on Sat, 23 Mar 2024 14:55. (View)

Guessedworker commented in entry 'Moscow's Bataclan' on Sat, 23 Mar 2024 14:07. (View)

Thorn commented in entry 'Moscow's Bataclan' on Sat, 23 Mar 2024 13:12. (View)

Thorn commented in entry 'Moscow's Bataclan' on Sat, 23 Mar 2024 12:51. (View)

Thorn commented in entry 'Out of foundation and into the mind-body problem, part four' on Sat, 23 Mar 2024 12:38. (View)

Guessedworker commented in entry 'Moscow's Bataclan' on Sat, 23 Mar 2024 10:01. (View)

Al Ross commented in entry 'Out of foundation and into the mind-body problem, part four' on Sat, 23 Mar 2024 05:13. (View)

Thorn commented in entry 'Out of foundation and into the mind-body problem, part four' on Fri, 22 Mar 2024 23:51. (View)

Thorn commented in entry 'Out of foundation and into the mind-body problem, part four' on Thu, 21 Mar 2024 11:14. (View)

Al Ross commented in entry 'Out of foundation and into the mind-body problem, part four' on Thu, 21 Mar 2024 05:14. (View)

Thorn commented in entry 'Out of foundation and into the mind-body problem, part four' on Tue, 19 Mar 2024 11:42. (View)

Al Ross commented in entry 'Out of foundation and into the mind-body problem, part four' on Tue, 19 Mar 2024 11:01. (View)

Thorn commented in entry 'Out of foundation and into the mind-body problem, part four' on Tue, 19 Mar 2024 10:41. (View)

affection-tone