|
|
WARNING: WHAT YOU ARE ABOUT TO SEE IS A PROFANE HERESY“Kramer’s” Racist Tirade—Caught on Tape
I haven’t seen the video yet. I’ll update this post as I get new info. (I’ve yet to confirm rumors that Richards was responding to being called a cracker, or that he told the negros “that’s what happens when you interrupt a white man”) Update: Richards is a Jew:
Posted by Svyatoslav Igorevich on Monday, November 20, 2006 at 06:33 PM in Humour, Popular Culture Comments:2
Posted by James Bowery on November 20, 2006, 08:50 PM | # The whole idea of freedom of speech is that you should be able to say things that people find offensive. Now, I don’t happen to think freedom of speech is fundamental to human rights. It is freedom of association from which all other conceptions of “human rights” can be constructed through voluntary associations. Hence, if you aren’t going to allow people to freely associate—because you are enforcing things like the “Fair” Housing Act, affirmative action, military action against secessionist groups, etc.—then you have just lost your right to _anything_ including, not only the right to tell others what they can and can’t say about you, but your very rights as a human being, for you have denied those rights to others. 3
Posted by Svyatoslav Igorevich on November 20, 2006, 09:24 PM | # I don’t see this as a free speech issue. Cosmo was free to say what he said. The negros were free to say what they said. The media is free to say what it’s saying. Comedy clubs are free to refuse to hire him (okay, that’s not free speech). The issue is that the media is racist (anti-white). 4
Posted by Emma Regina on November 20, 2006, 09:37 PM | # This is like the article ‘The evolution of blond hair and blue eyes among Nordics.’ Racism is everywhere. 5
Posted by James Bowery on November 20, 2006, 09:55 PM | # Cosmo was free to say what he said. Kimberly was treated for her injury at a hospital, and her husband contacted the sheriff to ask that charges be filed against the Black. Six weeks went by. Then Lonny Rae got a call to come to the sheriff’s office. He went ...and was arrested himself! Originally charged with harrassment (name-calling on a man who had assaulted his wife) and disturbing the peace (being loud when he did it), the prosecutor later decided that Lonny’s “crimes” were “serious enough” to be elevated to felonies. 6
Posted by Svyatoslav Igorevich on November 20, 2006, 11:56 PM | # One anecdote and I’m being naive? We don’t quite have legally-enforced speech codes here yet. We have a toe in the water, is all. 7
Posted by Svyatoslav Igorevich on November 21, 2006, 12:23 AM | # Though it is totally true that we have a generally rogue State that can almost certainly put any of us without scads of dough and a monk’s lifestyle in prison, whenever it wants. 8
Posted by rustymason on November 21, 2006, 09:09 AM | # Richards flipped out. What he said definitely should not be illegal, but it was without a doubt in very poor taste and he should’ve kept his act professional. It would be incredible if he ever gets another job in showbiz. Yesterday Michael Weiner Savage was covering this on his radio program. He couldn’t pass up the chance to drag out every anti-White stereotype he could think of. And you could just see his finger wagging and him smirking “tsk, tsk” when the black audience member pointed out that Jews are the ones pushing the degenerate, gansta-rap music (with “nigger” used every fifth word) so hard. It’s times like these when you get to see the true nature of a “friendly” or a “good” Jew. 9
Posted by jlh on November 21, 2006, 10:28 AM | # Richards’ rant is a perfect example of what many Jews (and a lot of liberals) really think of blacks, white Christians—pretty much anybody but themselves—once they’re insulted and pushed emotionally to where they have no more defenses. Then the real feelings come out. What’s amazing is how well they stay on message most of the time: you know, race doesn’t exist, let’s you and him integrate and miscegenate, hybrid vigor, separation of church and state, 6 million, etc. 10
Posted by Daedalus on November 21, 2006, 10:57 AM | # I saw him apologize and claim he is not a racist on CNN this morning. 11
Posted by rustymason on November 21, 2006, 12:16 PM | # And I don’t like Richards’ speaking on my behalf to black people, saying 50 years ago Whites would’ve put a “f***ing fork up his ass.” A fork up his ass? That’s just psychotic. I cannot imagine Whites, of all peoples, being noted for something like that. Even in the mid 1800’s, vigilante action against blacks was rare and was usually due to special circumstances. White crime against blacks is still so relatively rare that when it does happen, it makes the world news for weeks. *I* feel slandered here. Richards owes me and my fellow Whites an apology for stereotyping us in this very unfair way, saying that “we Whites” would do something like that. 12
Posted by dchamil on November 21, 2006, 01:48 PM | # James Bowery said that to enforce military action against secessionist groups is to deny freedom of association. In this regard, the American Civil War to prevent Southerners from leaving the Union can be likened to the rule for the Mafia or Islam. Once you’re in, you’re in for life, and efforts to leave will be met with deadly force! 13
Posted by James Bowery on November 21, 2006, 01:54 PM | # Your statement is true for the yeoman farmers of the south who were conned into fighting on behalf of their slave importing elites— the same elites that were putting the yeoman farmers and their sons out of business by replacing their sons with Africans on the precious lands of the south. The plantation owners had lost their human rights and they doomed the south. 14
Posted by Svyatoslav Igorevich on November 21, 2006, 02:16 PM | # Rusty, AFAICT Richards is not jewish, but a white raised Roman Catholic. 15
Posted by ben tillman on November 21, 2006, 04:07 PM | # He’s Jewish—at least that’s what all the Jewish periodicals say. 16
Posted by rustymason on November 21, 2006, 04:11 PM | # It does not matter whether he is Jewish or not, my statement still stands: his representation of what Whites would have done is completely offensive, totally in line with the all-too-common antiWhite stereotypes of today. Or does someone here think that his statement (fork up the wazoo) is accurate? 17
Posted by Svyatoslav Igorevich on November 21, 2006, 05:16 PM | # Ben, if you have a link (or even a quote) it’d be appreciated. 18
Posted by Desmond Jones on November 21, 2006, 05:30 PM | # According to Wiki: Richards is a Master Mason, and also holds 33° in the Scottish Rite; he is very active in preservation of masonic research, and in his personal life is an avid reader. He is a member of the following lodges: Riviera Lodge No. 780, Culver City–Foshay No. 467 lodge, Southern California Research Lodge. He is also a Life Member of the Los Angeles Scottish Rite Valley and a Life Member of the Scottish Rite Research Society. 19
Posted by rustymason on November 21, 2006, 05:40 PM | # Desmond, what does that mean to the average reader? There are so many rumors about Masons that it’s impossible to tell what you might be hinting at. 20
Posted by calvin on November 21, 2006, 05:55 PM | # I am loath to direct anyone to this website but take a look at “Black Kids Taught To Fight” if you want to see some disgustingly gratuitous use of the racist epithet “nigger” in a truly disturbing context. http://www.finalsolution88.com/multimedia2.htm Richard’s outburst is beatific in comparison. 21
Posted by Desmond Jones on November 21, 2006, 05:57 PM | # Not hinting at anything Rusty. However, it appears he’s not Jew if he is a Free Mason. It is alleged that there is a link between Free Masonry and the Klan, implicating Albert Pike as a founder. Pike was the Sovereign Grand Commander of the Scottish Rite’s Southern Jurisdiction in 1859. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Albert_Pike W.J. Simmons resurrector of the Klan in 1915 also appears to have links to Scottish Rite’s Free Masonry. However, your comment is valid until proven otherwise. 22
Posted by rustymason on November 21, 2006, 06:08 PM | # Desmond, there are plenty of Jews in Masonry, especially in the Scottish Rite. There are, increasibly, even Hindus and Buddhists, as the world shrinks and our homelands are further invaded. There may be a “link” between the Klan and Masonry only insomuch as the same community leaders that tend to be in one organization also (at one time) tended to also be in the other, as well as in one or more churches in their area, the Lion’s Club, rotary, and Boy Scouts. Wikipedia’s a good example of how combining millions of uninformed opinions together still cannot produce real knowledge. 23
Posted by Desmond Jones on November 21, 2006, 06:26 PM | # Rusty, Scottish Rite’s Jews? For instance? The Wiki piece on Pike was quite informative. 24
Posted by Al Ross on November 21, 2006, 06:36 PM | # That very wise Freemason, Rudyard Kipling, mixed with local elite lodge-members of the British Empire’s subject races during his long Masonic career but that fact didnt invalidate his poetic admonition about “East is East and West is West”. Any presumption that membership of a Masonic lodge is incompatible with WN sentiments is incorrect. 25
Posted by Proofreader on November 21, 2006, 08:30 PM | # For what it´s worth: “Then there’s “Seinfeld.” Everybody knows Jerry Seinfeld is Jewish - on the tube and off. But what about the rest of the gang - Kramer, Elaine and George? Publicists for the show hemmed and hawed when asked about the characters’ religious identities, but a not-so-scientific survey of old episodes revealed that Cosmo Kramer, Elaine Benes and George Costanza are definitely not Jewish. In one episode, Michael Richards as Kramer (the real Kramer upon whom the character is based is Jewish and an old neighbor of “Seinfeld” co-creator Larry David) plans a Jewish singles function with authentic ethnic foods. He wants Jerry and Elaine (Julia Louis-Dreyfus) to attend, and Elaine says, “Well, I’m not Jewish!” To which Kramer replies, “Neither am I.” In the same show, Kramer holds the function at the Knights of Columbus Hall, courtesy of George’s dad’s membership. Knights of Columbus is a Catholic organization.” 26
Posted by Al Ross on November 21, 2006, 09:40 PM | # The character George Costanza is played by a Jewish actor called Greenspan using the stage name Jason Alexander. The character called Elaine is played by Julia Louis-Dreyfuss and her father is a French-born Jew. I dont know the racial background of her mother. 27
Posted by Election Summary on November 21, 2006, 09:47 PM | # Seinfeld is thoroughly Jewish in humor. The derogative “shiksa” is used, WASP families are subtly ridiculed; WASPish women are depicted as sexually insatiable, and tossed away regularly. Jason Alexander and Dreyfus are Jews off-screen, and crypto-Jews on. Jews especially recognize that they play Jewish characters. For instance, “George” is the stereotypical neurotic, scheming Jew, depicted as an Italian in the show, a typical off-loading of negative stereotypes onto other groups. Even the humor operates at several levels, the surface, which non-Jews understand, and the crypto, which Talmudic in spirit. Example: In one episode, Jason refers to the gorgeous Aryan trophy wife of a clearly Jewish executive as “a piece of meat”. Where have we heard that? The mostly gentile audience laughs, not knowing that they themselves are mocked. 28
Posted by Lurker on November 21, 2006, 11:15 PM | # Two fairly regular characters who were always portrayed as two-dimensional idiots were Elaine’s boss (Peterman) and her sometime boyfriend the mechanic (Puddy). Both non-jewish characters. 29
Posted by Svyatoslav Igorevich on November 21, 2006, 11:30 PM | # When I first learned that “Alexander’s” character and his family are supposed to be Italian I almost busted a gut laughing. 30
Posted by rustymason on November 21, 2006, 11:42 PM | # Desmond, there are Jews in Masonry, you’re either going to have to join and see for yourself or just trust me on this one. Al, Masonry has changed much since Kipling. It has evolved (or devolved, depending on how you want to look at it) to include ever more of “the other” in the name of brotherhood. I don’t know how far up the Jewish membership and influence go, but considering the new, darker members, I’d say pretty high, at least in the U.S. It really sucks; Jews screw up everything everywere they go, it seems. 31
Posted by Al Ross on November 22, 2006, 01:10 AM | # Actually, Rusty, American Freemasons are very conservative in their interpretation of freedom of association. Please see : http://www.post-gazette.com/pg/06302/733564-84.stm If the other clubs and associations in the US held the line like Freemasons, the country would be much improved. 32
Posted by Desmond Jones on November 22, 2006, 02:41 AM | # Rusty, The Grand Lodge of Scotland supports your claim.
33
Posted by rustymason on November 22, 2006, 10:10 AM | # Al, yours is second-hand information. Yes, most lodges are, thankfully, still segregated. However, that has been changing over the years. And as the old gray guard fades away, the newer members bring their unexamined, multicultural belief systems with them into the lodges, and thus have a lower resistance to invasion. Desmond, being anything other than a loyal member to the State is dangerous under any dictatorship. Masonry has been especially feared by the Church and by totalitarian state governors because the early Freemasons were dedicated to checking abuses of extreme centralized power, both in the Church and Monarchy. But Freemasonry has changed since then, I believe. Hitler may have been hostile to it not only because of its original purpose, checking abuse of power, but because of its increasingly Judaic tilt. Today, much American Freemasonry seems to have fallen under the spell of, or at least does not recognize the full nature and danger of, the globalist/communist religion that has raped the minds of our people. Traditional Masonry’s resistance is weak against it because its goals were based in another time and set of circumstances. It was originally formed in a world with strict political and cultural boundaries and endeavored to reach out across those borders to other freedom-loving men (Whites). With globalism and the dissolution of nationhood upon us, this goal is, I believe, now being used against it, corrupting its original purpose. I’m not saying that Masonry is fully multiculti, at least not yet. Just that, unless enough Whites who are racially aware join and assume leadership duties, Masonry will indeed be just one more corrupted organization, one more enemy we have will have to fight against for our and our children’s freedom. 35
Posted by rustymason on November 22, 2006, 12:11 PM | # Can you describe the video? That link crashes my browser. 36
Posted by JB on November 23, 2006, 12:25 AM | # now he apologizes on CBS. typical. http://youtube.com/watch?v=I3l-gRHjUNk
it’s also on Youtube, perhaps it will play better than at video.google http://youtube.com/watch?v=amjUNF_R_PY GW feel free to erase the following if it bothers you, I will now describe the video for Mr.Mason the video starts with Richards yelling “Shut up! 50 years ago we’d have you upside down with a fork up your ass” at someone in the audience whom we presume was heckling. Then he yells at him “you can talk now, oh you can talk! throw his ass out! he’s a nigger! Look there’s a nigger!” then he says talking to the audience “ooooohhhh. Alright you see it shocks you, it shocks you to see what’s buried beneath you stupid motherfuckers.” Then the nigger who heckled him says “That was uncalled for” to which Richards replies “It’s uncalled for you to unterrupt my ass you cheap motherfucker!” then some people start leaving, the aforementioned negro calls Richards a fucking cracker-ass motherfucker and Richards yells “You’re calling me cracker-ass nigga ?!” and the nig “fucking white boy” and a few shots back and forth, more people are leaving and Richards leaves the stage.
37
Posted by Englander on November 23, 2006, 12:30 PM | # You missed out: “That’s what you get when you interupt the white man, don’t you know” which I felt was the most supremacist part of the whole thing. 38
Posted by rustymason on November 23, 2006, 01:20 PM | # Oh, yes, thank you. I saw that on another site Monday (see my comment above about “fork up the ass.” 40
Posted by Matra on November 24, 2006, 01:05 AM | # If the hecklers had been fat Richards probably would’ve insulted them with references to their weight. When a person is raging with anger at another but unable to do much about it they often say something they think will anger or hurt that person. A generic insult won’t do - water off a duck’s back. It has to be personal and naturally if the person one intends to insult is someone you don’t know well you’re pretty much reduced to remarks about their physical appearance - or perhaps their mother. I thought Richards should’ve just said “out of my impotent rage I said something I thought would anger them as much as they had angered me”. Unfortunately the weakling Oprah culture requires a public statement of regret - preferably involving tears - followed by pathetic grovelling for forgiveness eventually leading to absolution when the offender has shown to all that he now “gets it”. Then they are formally permitted to make a comeback. Just look at Trent Lott’s journey from pariah to minority leader in the senate. 42
Posted by Guest Lurker on April 04, 2010, 09:52 PM | #
On this issue of freemasonry, it’s a large organization with an elderly membership desperate for newer members. It would be incredibly easy to infiltrate and climb the ranks very quickly, all the while reaching out to and networking with like-minded nationalistic men within the fraternity. I’ve frequently wondered why it is there has never been a call from nationalistic organizations for a systematic campaign to infiltrate the masonic fraternity. I was a member of a lodge about 8 years ago, and though the vast majority of the men were elderly conservative patriotard types, I know they were deeply unhappy about the direction the country was going in. I demitted at the time because of the patriotard and philo-semitic attitude of many of the men there, but am now thinking about reaffiliating with a lodge and subtly embarking on my own little campaign of subversion. Though there are many bottom-feeders who join the fraternity hoping someone will hand them a job and a bag of money, there are still more of those who are financially comfortable. They can be mined to support emerging nationalistic organizations within our respective countries. Next entry: Old anti-racists just bloody fade away Previous entry: Cultural Learnings of Kazakhstan for Make Benefit Glorious Nation of Scotland |
|
Existential IssuesWhite Genocide ProjectOf note
Recent CommentsAlso see trash folder. Zenwheeli commented in entry 'A Line in the Sand' on 05/24/12, 08:32 PM. (go) (view) Neurrydar commented in entry 'A Line in the Sand' on 05/24/12, 07:57 PM. (go) (view) ZNyasare commented in entry 'This thread business' on 05/24/12, 07:10 PM. (go) (view) Wandrin commented in entry 'Golden Dawn - Greece' on 05/24/12, 04:44 PM. (go) (view) Lee John Barnes commented in entry 'Golden Dawn - Greece' on 05/24/12, 03:20 PM. (go) (view) grecian commented in entry 'Golden Dawn - Greece' on 05/24/12, 03:10 PM. (go) (view) Wandrin commented in entry 'Golden Dawn - Greece' on 05/24/12, 02:04 PM. (go) (view) Salvatore Quinto commented in entry 'More on the Indian beauty question' on 05/24/12, 12:47 PM. (go) (view) Classic Sparkle commented in entry 'Golden Dawn - Greece' on 05/24/12, 12:07 PM. (go) (view) Cobus commented in entry 'A genocide in South Africa' on 05/24/12, 10:14 AM. (go) (view) daniel commented in entry 'Golden Dawn - Greece' on 05/24/12, 09:49 AM. (go) (view) uh commented in entry 'Golden Dawn - Greece' on 05/24/12, 08:54 AM. (go) (view) daniel commented in entry 'Golden Dawn - Greece' on 05/24/12, 07:41 AM. (go) (view) uh commented in entry 'Golden Dawn - Greece' on 05/24/12, 07:18 AM. (go) (view) daniel commented in entry 'Golden Dawn - Greece' on 05/24/12, 06:53 AM. (go) (view) Swan commented in entry 'The facial proportions of beautiful people' on 05/24/12, 06:48 AM. (go) (view) Swan commented in entry 'The facial proportions of beautiful people' on 05/24/12, 06:47 AM. (go) (view) daniel commented in entry 'Golden Dawn - Greece' on 05/24/12, 06:32 AM. (go) (view) Guest commented in entry 'The Torment of the Mulattoes' on 05/24/12, 06:17 AM. (go) (view) daniel commented in entry 'Beyond the 14 words' on 05/24/12, 03:05 AM. (go) (view) Lee John Barnes commented in entry 'Golden Dawn - Greece' on 05/24/12, 02:31 AM. (go) (view) daniel commented in entry 'Golden Dawn - Greece' on 05/24/12, 02:03 AM. (go) (view) Captainchaos commented in entry 'Beyond the 14 words' on 05/23/12, 11:08 PM. (go) (view) Captainchaos commented in entry 'Golden Dawn - Greece' on 05/23/12, 09:13 PM. (go) (view) Leon Haller commented in entry 'Golden Dawn - Greece' on 05/23/12, 07:47 PM. (go) (view) Swan commented in entry 'Indian beauty' on 05/23/12, 12:52 PM. (go) (view) Lee John Barnes commented in entry 'Golden Dawn - Greece' on 05/23/12, 12:45 PM. (go) (view) Swan commented in entry 'More on the Indian beauty question' on 05/23/12, 12:31 PM. (go) (view) Leon Haller commented in entry 'Beyond the 14 words' on 05/23/12, 11:43 AM. (go) (view) Leon Haller commented in entry 'Golden Dawn - Greece' on 05/23/12, 11:32 AM. (go) (view) Mellaba Pechios commented in entry 'Golden Dawn - Greece' on 05/23/12, 07:55 AM. (go) (view) daniel commented in entry 'Beyond the 14 words' on 05/23/12, 03:51 AM. (go) (view) Leon Haller commented in entry 'Golden Dawn - Greece' on 05/22/12, 10:40 PM. (go) (view) Leon Haller commented in entry 'Golden Dawn - Greece' on 05/22/12, 10:40 PM. (go) (view) Leon Haller commented in entry 'Golden Dawn - Greece' on 05/22/12, 10:26 PM. (go) (view) Recent Posts
General NewsScience NewsScience CategoriesAll CategoriesThe WritersEach author's name links to a list of all articles posted by the writer; the hashes link to authors' homepages. LinksEndorsement not implied. Controlled Opposition Crime
General
Immigration
Islam Jews
Nationalist Political Parties
Science Whites in Africa |
Posted by onetwothree on November 20, 2006, 08:06 PM | #
He just flipped out. I mean, he went completely “playground” on them, and started shouting things—in this case, “Nigger-this, and nigger-that”. Maybe he’s a hard-boiled racist deep down, but this doesn’t indicate it real well. If you’ve ever been really, really angry (*), you know that your mind does a quick query, “What’s the nastiest thing I can say?” and it says it. When that happens, as you see here, a reputation can be scarred forever.
(*) Was his anger reasonable? We’d have to see the whole video. I’ve never been a comedian, but I can imagine that hecklers can cause some pretty serious rage.