“We’re the Sex Pistols of British politics …

Posted by NYC = race-mixing cesspool on September 02, 2009, 01:54 AM | #

In the USA, the National Geographic Channel is running the TV program “Human Family Tree”—there is tons of pro-race mixing propaganda in the program.  Just though someone here might want to review it and demolish some of its arguments.

Posted by More immigrants for Evropa on September 02, 2009, 04:24 AM | #

“EU eyes Europe-wide scheme to resettle more refugees” (September 2, 2009)

The European Commission will get the ball rolling with a recommendation for a “joint EU resettlement programme” under which nations would take in more refugees from poor and war-hit third countries.

Brussels—The EU this week unveils plans to boost and coordinate Europe’s response to the waves of immigrants from Africa and the Middle East, seeking to polish its own international image at the same time.

On Wednesday, the European Commission will get the ball rolling with a recommendation for a “joint EU resettlement programme” under which nations would take in more refugees from poor and war-hit third countries.

This scheme, though voluntary, is aimed at cutting the numbers seeking to reach Europe’s shores aboard rickety boats or via unscrupulous people traffickers.

The EU’s executive arm is also trying to ease the pressure on countries such as Malta, Italy and Spain which are in the frontline of the influx and feel that other member states are not sharing enough of the burden.

Then in October, the commission will publish proposals for harmonising asylum and family reunion criteria through Europe.

While the European Union is keen to do its best to help refugee-laden countries plus the immigrants themselves, there is also a feeling that at the moment the bloc has an image problem.

“The current relatively low level of involvement of the EU in the resettlement of refugees impacts negatively on the ambition of the EU to play a prominent role in global humanitarian affairs and hence on the influence of the EU in international fora,” the commission said in the resettlement proposals.

According to UNHCR figures, last year EU nations resettled 6.7 percent of the 65,596 refugees who found new homes worldwide.

“Some countries can say ‘you are not doing sufficiently as a bloc’ and the figures certainly suggest that perhaps more can be done,” admitted commission spokesman Dennis Abbott.

A senior Vatican official recently deplored indifference to migrants after 73 Eritreans were reported to have died from hunger and thirst trying to reach Europe from North Africa.

Under the plans a new body, the European Asylum Support Office, will annually identify priority groups which need refuge, for example Iraqi refugees in Syria or Jordan, Somali refugees in Kenya or Sudanese refugees from Chad.

- http://www.expatica.com/de/news/german-news/EU-eyes-Europe_wide-scheme-to-resettle-more-refugees—_55933.html

Posted by nonracist on September 02, 2009, 05:08 PM | #

Race doesn’t exist.

Posted by James Bowery on September 02, 2009, 05:46 PM | #

Race doesn’t exist.  Reality is just a social construct.  Kookookachoo

Posted by BGD on September 02, 2009, 05:55 PM | #

Well now they seem like they are about to capitulate and reframe their constitution to allow in all and sundry so perhaps they can hoover up that 20%. Problem is the policies they had will then be a thing of the past..

Posted by Dan Dare on September 02, 2009, 06:21 PM | #

Griffin is simply being pragmatic. The Equalities Bill that is currently progessing through Parliament will remove any possible loopholes that might have existed under the present Race Relations Act for registered political parties to organise themselves on ethnic lines. The Equalities Bill will be enacted in Spring 2010, which highlights the transparently political nature of the EHRC’s litigation against the BNP.

It’s a simple fact of life that a government-funded quango with an annual budget of over $100 million and open access to the best legal talent is going to be able to continue any litigation for far longer than the BNP.

As Griffin notes, the only sensible way forward is to attempt to recast the party constitution to ensure that infiltrators and provocateurs inimical to the core mission of representing the interests of the indigenous population do not have an opportunity to take over the political leadership.

Posted by James Bowery on September 02, 2009, 06:34 PM | #

If the experience in the US with the EEOC and “disparate impact” is any guide, the BNP will be guilty until proven innocent of any accusations of race bias in its membership.  All the multi-cult supremacists will have to do is file transparently frivolous lawsuits and the courts will uphold them.

As long as the new right parties refuse to focus their energies on a citizen’s dividend they’ll be unsuccessful and the nation states of Europe will descend into chaos.

Losers are playing this political game and taking Europe down with them.  No one should give them the benefit of the doubt with what is at stake.

Posted by BGD on September 02, 2009, 07:00 PM | #

Well Dan let’s hope that the brains at BNP HQ can come up with something, sceptical myself. What?change the voting body within the BNP to members of 20 years or more? It’ll also likely mean Griffin becomes leader for life.

Posted by Guessedworker on September 02, 2009, 07:06 PM | #

It can’t be difficult to allow for the expulsion of members with aberrant opinions and behaviour, or association with hostile external organisations.  All parties reserve the right to protect their own political integrity.  What’s the problem?

Posted by Protecting The Leadership Class From Takeover on September 02, 2009, 09:17 PM | #

The lowest level of activities that might take place to protect the leadership class from takeover at such a political party would be to elevate The Eternal Pig into an intense symbolic representation of the productive class.  We all know who decreed that the name “Swine Flu” must be changed to “H1N1” just this year, and a highly stylized (think fleur-de-lis as a highly stylized drawing of the white lily) drawing could be inserted everywhere.  The “piggy bank” is a beloved symbol, for example.

Then the food at party leadership conferences in the morning could include crisp delicious bacon, lunch might include some Canadian bacon, and dinner (or supper) could feature tasty, moist, delicious pork chops.  After three days of the Trial By Swine (oops, I mean Dine By Swine), any group would have a good idea as to some of whom could be trusted in at least the next level of authority.

In the USA, this wouldn’t be too unusual inasmuch as we remember that the great northwest territory, incorporated and organized pursuant to the Articles of Confederation in 1785, was a vast swampy, snake-ridden landscape which was cleared of its rattlesnakes by the importation of pigs to kill them.  Pigs usually get no respect, but they are the most intelligent of animals and the cleanest if allowed.

Posted by danielj on September 02, 2009, 09:33 PM | #

Non-racists don’t exist!

Posted by BGD on September 03, 2009, 05:55 AM | #

Posted by Guessedworker on September 02, 2009, 11:06 PM | #

It can’t be difficult to allow for the expulsion of members with aberrant opinions and behaviour, or association with hostile external organisations.  All parties reserve the right to protect their own political integrity.  What’s the problem?

Perhaps. If hundreds of organised trouble makers join the BNP and engage in disruption activities (attending meetings etc) then it won’t be so easy, membership expulsion has in law (I believe)  a legal process, appeals etc.

Isn’t this in some ways an invaluable propaganda gift in that as the BNP has started to make headway an agency of the state is trying to prevent their freedom of operation and the state itself is engaged in a pincer movement to outlaw them as a political party - or at least outlawing them by surrogate means… These arguments are already being made in some op-ed type pages of the press.

This isn’t happening with the NF (or other more liberal friendly ethnically based organisations)

Is this not the cue to sharpen the propaganda tools in t the run up to the general election a campaign could say -

The mother of parliaments is imperiled, vote for us now, save our democratic process or tomorrow you will have no choice. Tyranny is upon us. All parties talk about restricting immigration. None honestly do so. Vote BNP blah, blah. (OK, I’m no Joseph Goebbels)

Also, who knows what will happen in the Lords when this gets to them (stuffed with placemen as they are but also still of an independent cast of mind). If it gets sent back to HoC and a Conservative government and a successful campaign has managed to show how tyrannical the measure is in intent then perhaps the likes of the blimpish Mail would start to make some noises, backbench mutterings “I’m not for the BNP but it’s the electorates choice who they vote for not Parliaments” and might see the death of this aspect of the bill.

A lot of assumptions in all this but is this not the battle to fight? It does seem that the BNP is dying a death by a thousand cuts/compromises, what next?

Posted by John on September 05, 2009, 05:24 PM | #

It can’t be difficult to allow for the expulsion of members with aberrant opinions and behaviour, or association with hostile external organisations.  All parties reserve the right to protect their own political integrity.  What’s the problem?

It also can’t be difficult with membership criteria/tests/dues, background checks, etc. to vet prospective members beforehand.

Posted by Svigor on September 06, 2009, 10:37 PM | #

As Griffin notes, the only sensible way forward is to attempt to recast the party constitution to ensure that infiltrators and provocateurs inimical to the core mission of representing the interests of the indigenous population do not have an opportunity to take over the political leadership.

It can’t be difficult to allow for the expulsion of members with aberrant opinions and behaviour, or association with hostile external organisations.  All parties reserve the right to protect their own political integrity.  What’s the problem?

Obviously Brits know their system better than I do, but my thinking has been along GW’s lines.  BNP will require their candidates to toe a line that non-whites will find extremely unpleasant.  How many non-whites are going to join up to stump about how immigration, particularly darkie immigration, needs to stop, Britain for native Brits, white rights, terrorists out, etc?  And the ones that do, who would want to stop them?  That’d be like the blacks refusing to let the Jews start the NAACP.

As for lawsuits and disparate impact, uhm, a two bit lawyer can point to the other parties and their ethnic composition; anyone here think the British political establishment is going to turn over the reins to darkies just to torpedo the BNP?

Posted by Svigor on September 06, 2009, 10:45 PM | #

Protecting The Leadership Class From Takeover

Yup.  And don’t forget lots of classical music, traditional British entertainment, pictures of Nordics everywhere, maybe screenings of Birth of a Nation/Anne of Green Gables/The Sound of Music, public oaths, etc., etc., ad infinitum.

Darkies would run for the hills.

Milo: Just once, I’d like to hear you scream, in pain.

Joe: Play some rap music.

Posted by Lurker on September 06, 2009, 10:56 PM | #

a two bit lawyer can point to the other parties and their ethnic composition

Good one Svi, I’ll be using that.