Where Are the Death Face Photos of Amy Leigh Barnes?

Posted by EuroNationalist on December 31, 2009, 03:58 PM | #

When the Saxon begins to hate and when the Saxon begins to act on this hate, it will be out of revenge for acts such as this one.

Posted by Cyd on December 31, 2009, 04:51 PM | #

Tragic as well as extremely infuriating.  Though one wonders where were her parents to dissuade the young one from cavorting with Negroes?  Why was she such a Negro lover to begin with?  From the Wiki article’s links, she was shown hugging another Negro (her friend), so she was comfortable around these animals.  What kind of result does one expect when you are constantly in the company of animals?

Posted by James Bowery on December 31, 2009, 06:28 PM | #

Gettin’ Real:

A pimp beating up is “bitch” is called “Gorilla Pimping” and as one white prostitute admitted sometimes she gets “gorilla pimped”. The pimp sitting with her admitted to beating on her from time to time but says when he beats on her he is “Not cold like Hitler” but cold. They all generally agreed that beating women is usually what the woman wants. It seemed to be an across the board agreement that the prostitutes will “Push limits to see if you will back up what you say when you say you will kill her.” One went on to say that when you beat her you “Have to beat her like you are going to kill her and that she is lucky to be alive and begging ‘daddy please don’t kill me like you said you was going to.’ That is the only way bitches know you serious about your business.”

Git jiggy wit it you pussy white men… you call women “bitches” and kill them at your whim?  No?  Den you’ jus’ askin’ t’ave yo’ punk-ass salad tossed by a real man.

All “kidding” aside:  I’m serious about my request for death face photos from Great Britain.  Is the BNP good for anything?

Posted by Q on December 31, 2009, 06:40 PM | #

Amy’s murder is due in large part to decades of Jews - and others - pushing WF/BM coupling. 

Anybody here remember the 1960’s hit single ‘Society’s Child’ by Janis Ian (born Janis Eddy Fink [Jew])?

I’m not saying that particular song was in-and-of-itself powerful enough to breakdown racial barriers; however, it was a clear example of the sort of propaganda that fueled the Cultural-Revolution of the Sixties. 

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yW_rYLoIR08

Posted by Fred Scrooby on December 31, 2009, 07:10 PM | #

“Amy’s murder is due in large part to decades of Jews - and others - pushing WF/BM coupling.”  (—Q)

Correct.  That sums it up.  I’d leave out “in large part.”

Posted by Captainchaos on December 31, 2009, 07:50 PM | #

This is not the way to go James, you are climbing down in the muck with Giles, down to the level of the “psychopath”.  For what is it that you hope to elicit but the murderous rage of the mob?  Or that is at least what our betters would have us believe.

Posted by Al Ross on December 31, 2009, 07:54 PM | #

Depressing stuff, JB. Here’s an item which may lighten the mood - a US Congressman of the Jewish persuasion, one Jared Polis, aims to make it easier for foreigners who drop out of American colleges to settle in that country.

http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/technology/8417510.stm

I don’t suppose that this meddling Jew would ever suggest such an idea for his true country of citizenship, viz., Israel.

Posted by Angela on December 31, 2009, 08:07 PM | #

Should one trust the cops in ENGLAND? I don’t think so.

Posted by Angela on December 31, 2009, 08:10 PM | #

Not to mention the JEWdicary.

Posted by James Bowery on December 31, 2009, 08:54 PM | #

Captainchaos, if you think some guys using their limited internet presence to expose to the light of day the reality of enforced integration is the incitement of murderous mobs, then what do you call decades of mass media broadcast of lies about white heterosexual men to the point that women like Amy would rather have their faces mutilated and beg to die at the hands of a black than bear a white child?

Just whose side are you on?

Posted by Captainchaos on December 31, 2009, 09:15 PM | #

James, my comment was intended in a spirit of sarcasm, and to satirize the “butthurt” (as GT would put it) response to the Giles’ interview of Hunter Wallace at Occidental Dissent.  I do not think Giles is a “psychopath,” as Hunter Wallace has characterized him.  I do not think he is working for the Feds, as Hunter Wallace has claimed.  I do not think Giles was out to get Hunter Wallace, but intended to put pressure on him to radicalize his views.  I think that as our enemies hit us we should hit back.  And, looking at your post, I take it you would tend to agree.

Posted by James Bowery on December 31, 2009, 09:28 PM | #

I believe the truth is the higher calling than sensibilities of those who would posture as our betters.

In the present situation, after brain injuries inflicted by decades of watching motion picture lies about heterosexual white men, it may be that speaking directly to the amygdala of people via accurate emotive images is the best service of truth for the masses. It may even be the best way of reaching the mid-level officers who have not sold their honor for promotions, as Jim Giles hopes—but that is for him to decide.

Posted by Guessedworker on December 31, 2009, 09:49 PM | #

It’s not Jews, or only Jews, but the cultural class who have engineered this entry of the Negro into the sexual life of girls like Amy.  They did it because they are warriors in the war against racism, prejudice and discrimination, as so recently and comprehensibly documented by Dan Dare.

I harbour a due measure of hatred for these people, and long for the day when their facial expressions sour and the cost of their war against their own people comes home to them.

Here is a truer comment on errant English womanhood, as the type exists in time and free of the stains of modern political minds:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9uNn2TDDru0

The group is Pentangle, and these are the lyrics:

Willie o’ Winsbury

The king had been a prisoner
And a prisoner long in Spain
And Willie of the Winsbury
Has lain long with his daughter at home

“What ails you, what ails you, my daughter Janet
Why you look so pale and wan
Have you had any sore sickness
Or yet been sleeping with a man?”

“I have not had any sore sickness
Nor yet been sleeping with a man
It is for you, my father dear,
For biding so long in Spain”

“Cast off, cast off your berry-brown gown
Stand naked on the stane
That I may know you by your shape
If you be a maiden or nane”

So she cast off her berry-brown gown
Stood naked on the stone
Her apron was low, her haunches round
Her face was pale and wan

“Was it with a lord or a duke or a knight
Or a man of birth and fame
Or was it with one of my serving men
That’s lately come out of Spain?”

“It wasn’t with a lord or a duke or a knight
Nor a man of birth and fame
But it was with Willie of Winsbury
I could bide no longer alain”

The king has called on his merry men all
By thirty and by three
Saying “Fetch me this Willie of Winsbury
For hanged he shall be”

But when he came before the king
He was clad all in the red silk
His hair was like the strands of gold
His skin was as white as the milk

“It is no wonder,” said the king
“That my daughter’s love you did win
For if I was a woman, as I am a man
My bedfellow you would have been”

“Now will you marry my daughter Janet
By the truth of your right hand?
Will you marry my daughter Janet
I’ll make you lord of all my land”

“Oh yes, I’ll marry your daughter Janet
By the truth of my right hand
Oh yes I’ll marry your daughter Janet
But I’ll not be the lord of your land”

He’s mounted her on a milk-white steed
Himself on a dapple grey
He has made her the lady of as much land
As she will ride in a long summer’s day

Posted by Fred Scrooby on December 31, 2009, 10:02 PM | #

“It may even be the best way of reaching the mid-level officers who have not sold their honor for promotions”  (—James Bowery)

If you are a soldier in today’s U.S. Armed Forces, keeping your true views to yourself as you go ahead and mouthe what you consider to be PC bullshit as required by the Jewligarchy before you can be considered for promotion is not selling your honor.  Quite the contrary:  it’s the most honorable thing a white soldier can do today.  In normal times it would not be.  Today’s different:  we are under occupation by an enemy that means to genocide us; indeed, has already begun. 

The time will come when orders will go out from the Jewligarchy to the Armed Forces to open fire on innocent white people for attempting to assert their right not to be genocided.  On that day, we won’t stand a chance unless senior-level white officers disobey those Jewish orders.  That won’t happen unless right now, today, there are lower-level white officers who sense what’s going on, foresee its future portent, and prepare for that future by mouthing the PC bullshit to get promoted, without changing or divulging their private views. 

Those will be the senior-level soldiers of tomorrow who’ll refuse to fire on whites on the day that order is handed down from D.C.

Of course, the instant that order is disobeyed, things immediately come to a head and open military revolt is underway, either as a coup d’état or the beginning of a civil war.  In that open revolt we’ll need as many upper-level white army officers on our side as possible.

The U.S. Jewocracy’s current program of methodically promoting non-whites over whites in the Armed Forces (“Affirmative Action” promotions) must be consciously intended to prevent any such future white mutiny:  the Jews can’t know which of today’s white junior officers are lying in order to get promoted, but if they stop promoting whites altogether they don’t have to know — few or zero upper-level white officers means no mutiny when the order goes out to mow down “white racists, haters, fascists, and anti-Semites.”

So no, mouthing the obligatory anti-white PC bullshit in order to get promoted is not “selling their honor for promotions.”  In fact, under the circumstances it’s the only honorable thing to do.

Posted by Fred Scrooby on December 31, 2009, 11:30 PM | #

By pure coincidence I just happened across the following, over at Scotchfiend’s (I did not see it before posting my comment above):

Given the institutionalized anti-White antipathy and bias of “our” “civil society” and the closely related ZOG (AKA the system), we are not duty or honor bound to sacrifice our personal, group, descendants’ or ancestors’ interests by recklessly upholding a traditional White idealistic sense of honor, honesty and fair play.  Doing so would allow anti-White haters who fight dirty to twist our virtues against us for base and genocidal ends.  Our honor should be reserved for our people and given only to those treating us with honor.  Those treating us in good faith and honor should receive the same from us […].

For example, right now many instititions, including the military, deliberately weed out pro-White activists while allowing non-White activists, supremacists and gang members including some Jewish supremacists with their primary loyalty to other Jews and Israel instead of “America.”  If the system is rigged against us it has no legitimacy and we have no obligation to weaken ourselves by scrupulously giving honesty to a dishonorable and dishonest system.

We Need Lots-O-Infiltrators!

We need many pro-Whites embedded within existing institutions to gather intelligence, leak evil or embarrassing data, oppose or undermine anti-White actions and policies, sow discord among our enemies and so on.  Some of them are already in place but aren’t yet pro-White, while others will infiltrate in the future.  Many of these Whites may need to keep quiet or even directly lie about their pro-White commitment.  This would not be dishonorable.  This country was created by our forefathers for their posterity and has been hijacked by an evil anti-White system undeserving of our support unless it abandons its anti-White oppression and stops promoting long-term White genocide. […]

New Leaders and Crypto Pro-Whites

[…] Some pro-Whites must decide early on to keep their commitment hidden so they can best serve our interests.  This is a perfectly honorable choice until we’ve reclaimed our legitimate rights and reversed anti-White oppression.

[ http://scotchfiend.blogspot.com/2009/12/silent-diffusion.html ]

Posted by jamesUK on January 01, 2010, 12:16 AM | #

@Captainchaos

Are you suggesting that Giles is just using his hick persona as a cover and is trying to entrap potential serious leadership people by making contacts with people in the military or ex service people?

Makes sense why he would support the US foreign globalist agenda and bring on an historian affiliated with the likes of AEI, Jamestown foundation, etc.

And why he would disrespect Dr Duke and call for new leadership where he does not led himself rather create a potential umbrella organisation were potential leaders would come and he would have all there information on a database that he would give to the Feds.

DIABOLICALLY CLEVER!

JIM GILES OUSTED!

Posted by jamesUK on January 01, 2010, 01:12 AM | #

@Fred Scrooby

I guess you could perceive it as Jews creating a black Golem from a Jewish mentality viewpoint.

Posted by Fred Scrooby on January 01, 2010, 01:15 AM | #

On the European Front, Paul Belien warns of “the potential for a revolutionary explosion of violence and anger somewhere down the road” if our overlords refuse to stop what they’re doing:

Governments vs The People:  Replacing The Population By Another One

There are conspiracy theories that hold that Europe’s political establishment is deliberately attempting to replace the continent’s population by an entirely different one.  Though conspiracy theories are rarely true, Europe’s political establishment is making it extremely hard for the sceptics to refute them. Take, for instance, the recent Belgian amnesty for illegal aliens. […] The Vlaams Belang, Belgium’s main opposition party […] requested the Council of State, Belgium’s highest administrative court, to annul the amnesty – which it did on December 11.

The government’s reaction to the annulment is astonishing.  It announced that the court ruling would make no difference and that the illegal aliens need not worry.  Mr. Melchior Wathelet, the Secretary of State for Immigration, said that, instead of collectively regularizing the 50,000 illegal aliens with one single signature, he will sign 50,000 individual regulations, granting each of them an individual amnesty. […] Last September, a civil servant of Belgium’s Federal Agency for Aliens, warned:  “This amnesty is madness.  Our agency expects that one in every three is going to apply for welfare benefits.”  […] Nevertheless, despite the court’s objections and despite the opposition of the people, the illegal aliens will be regularized. […]

For those who do not believe in the population replacement theory, it is hard to explain why the Belgian government, despite a court ruling, stubbornly sticks to its decision.

For those who do not believe in a conspiracy theory, it is equally hard to explain why on 15 December, George Papandreou, the Prime Minister of Greece, announced that one of the measures to reduce his country’s crushing budget deficit will be to “bring illegal immigrants into the social security system.” […]

Those who do not believe that Europe’s ruling establishment has engaged in a conspiracy against it own people will also have a hard time explaining the recent decision of the appeals chamber of the Bar Association’s disciplinary council in the Netherlands.  On 12 December, it acquitted a Muslim lawyer of contempt of court.  The Muslim lawyer, who wears a Muslim head covering during court sessions, refuses to rise when the judge enters the courtroom. […T]he Muslim lawyer is getting away with behavior which the ruling establishment would not tolerate from indigenous Dutch lawyers, and, more importantly, which the majority of the Dutch people does not wish to tolerate from newcomers.

Europe’s ruling establishment is currently engaged in policies which go so radically against what ordinary Europeans want that a dangerous rift is growing between the people and those who govern them.  If this situation is not remedied, Europe’s governments risk losing their legitimacy in the eyes of the people.  One does not need to be a conspiracy theorist to realize that this can only contribute to the potential for a revolutionary explosion of violence and anger somewhere down the road.

[ http://www.brusselsjournal.com/node/4232 ]

Posted by Angela on January 01, 2010, 02:43 AM | #

Q: Where Are the Death Face Photos of Amy Leigh Barnes?

A: Classified for your protection (well classified for somebody’s protections, not sure who).

Posted by James Bowery on January 01, 2010, 03:55 AM | #

Fred, all I can say to your quite reasonable response is I hope you’re right.  The ethics of infiltration are very problematic and I’m not expert in them at all except to say this:  It is far easier to be a genetic hypocrite than a principled infiltrator—and there are vastly more of the former than the latter in the world.  This reinforces what you say in the sense that the few righteous men who don the genocidal piety of the de facto government, while in true service to the de jure government Constituted for the benefit of the posterity of the founders—those few righteous are all the more valuable.

Posted by James Bowery on January 01, 2010, 04:09 AM | #

On Belien’s warning:  It has actually occurred to me in my more speculative moments that there is a white supremacist elite behind all this torture of the masses of EuroPEONS world wide.  The purpose is to eschatologically transform the world’s EuroPEONS into such a state of controlled delirium that, before they clear their minds, they will have genocided all other races.  Indeed, such controlled mass delirium may be the only way to get EuroPEONS to carry out the acts they are so often accused of by their tormentors.

Posted by John Stonehouse on January 01, 2010, 10:46 AM | #

‘Leigh Barnes’?
More than a coincidence me thinks.

Posted by Fred Scrooby on January 01, 2010, 11:46 AM | #

In that same Scotchfiend log entry I linked in my 3:30 AM comment above, Scotchfiend [or Scotchf(r)iend as GW has dubbed him] goes on at some length calling for what he refers to as “Silent Diffusion,” meaning the covert infiltration by our guys of the institutions of our oppression, in a sort of “Gramscian Long March through the Institutions” but going in the opposite direction from Gramsci, till we’re able finally dislodge their iron boot heel from compressing our windpipe.  In his detailed entry Scotchf®iend also gets into technical computer-geek-type discussion of pratical tips for keeping anonymous on the internet so as to remain off the de facto occupation government’s radar as one goes about the civilizational-CPR process of “Silent Diffusion” (with a couple of asides along the way, such as one about the legitimacy of Holocau$t “Revisionism,” a subject some have loudly warned us to stay away from as counterproductive).  All in all, it’s a good read by Scotchf®iend.

Posted by Dasein on January 01, 2010, 01:15 PM | #

James, I didn’t have any luck finding photos after the attack.  I just did a bunch of different (rather obvious) Google searches.  The only thing I could find was a description of the attack: a 4 inch slash that ran from her ear across her cheek.

I did come across the following slash-related stories:

Shanni Taylor, a 13 year old student was slashed with a razor blade by a Somalian immigrant.

[IMG]http://i760.photobucket.com/albums/xx249/Aletheia14/_40933238_shanni203300-779369.jpg[/IMG]

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-393316/Supervision-order-girl-slashed-classmates-face.html

A 13-year-old girl who slashed a classmate across the face, leaving her needing 30 stitches, was today given a two-year supervision order by a judge.

Yesterday the girl, who cannot be named, was found guilty of unlawfully wounding Shanni Naylor at Myrtle Springs School in Sheffield last year when both girls were 12 but she was cleared of the more serious charge of wounding with intent.

Today at Sheffield Crown Court, the Recorder of Sheffield, Judge Alan Goldsack QC, said he did not have the power to give the girl a custodial sentence.

The three-day trial was told that, the day before the attack, the girl was subjected to a “vicious” assault by Shanni, who punched her repeatedly, banging her head against a wall, as more than 100 pupils looked on without helping.

The court heard the defendant describe how she did not plan to attack Shanni the next day but had found the blade and only wanted to scare her with it.

The jury was told how the girl had an extremely low IQ and had lived in Somalia for the first 10 years of her life without any formal education and having been orphaned when she was young.

A psychologist told the court she was likely to have been heavily influenced by a Somali custom in which women routinely settled disputes by inflicting minor scratches on each other’s faces.

Today the judge said that, given the background of the case, he was not surprised by yesterday’s verdict.

Sentencing the girl, he told her: “You have taken a razor blade with you into school, walked up to another girl in your class and, under the nose of your teacher, slashed that girl three times in the face with that razor.

“Serious wounds were inflicted on the face of that girl.”

The judge noted that Shanni’s injured face had appeared on the front page of a number of newspapers and added: “Media interest in your trial has remained considerable, no doubt because of the public concern about the number of knives and other sharp instruments being carried into schools by pupils and then used as weapons.

“Many who have not followed the details of the case may express some surprise that you were not convicted of the more serious offence.

“If you had been, a custodial sentence of some length would have been the only possible sentence despite your very young age.

“Its primary purpose would have been deterrent.

“I suspect few who have heard evidence in this case are surprised at that verdict. Rather they would take the view it’s another example of the jury system working at its best.”

Posted by Dasein on January 01, 2010, 01:20 PM | #

Peter Woodhams was slashed in the face 8 months before he was shot by Bradley Tucker.  Tucker is suspected to also have been the one who slashed his face.

[IMG]http://i760.photobucket.com/albums/xx249/Aletheia14/woodhams11b.jpg[/IMG]

[IMG]http://i760.photobucket.com/albums/xx249/Aletheia14/_42109222_tucker300.jpg[/IMG]

http://www.guardian.co.uk/uk/2007/mar/27/ukguns.news

Posted by Dasein on January 01, 2010, 01:23 PM | #

from Guardian article:

Woodhams, a 22-year-old satellite TV engineer from Custom House, east London, was shot four times at close range on the doorstep of his home last August. He died in front of his fiancée, Jane Bowden, and his young son, Sam.

Posted by Dasein on January 01, 2010, 01:53 PM | #

I’m sure her facial injuries were much more horrific than what those other 2 suffered.  I found some photos from gang slashings, but I won’t link to them as they’re quite disgusting.  I’m not sure that the photos from Barnes will be online anywhere.  You might have some luck if you contacted some of her friends or family, not sure if you’ve tried that already.

Posted by Fred Scrooby on January 01, 2010, 02:03 PM | #

In a recent OccidentalDissent.com log entry, Sam Davidson links to some photos along these lines including one of a former beauty now horribly scarred over most of her face and her chest after being the target of a sulfuric acid attack by Negroes:

http://www.occidentaldissent.com/2010/01/01/typical-negro-behavior-part-3/ .

Why are the Negroes suddenly all over the place here, doing this to white people, and when there aren’t enough of them to do it, why are more being brought in every day from places like Somalia, Nigeria, and Ethiopia to do it?  Answer:  it’s the fault of groups of whites like the Jews, the ELCA Lutherans, and other whites who are forcing a situation in which Negroes are not only free to ravage whites in this way but actually encouraged to do it, and whites are brainwashed into not fighting back, and believing they had it coming and deserve even more of it.  It’s these groups of whites — the Jews, the ECLA Lutherans, and others we all know — who are at fault.

Posted by PF on January 01, 2010, 02:12 PM | #

Thanks for the Pentangle link GW thats a cool song.

Posted by GenoType on January 02, 2010, 12:22 PM | #

If you are a soldier in today’s U.S. Armed Forces, keeping your true views to yourself as you go ahead and mouthe what you consider to be PC bullshit as required by the Jewligarchy before you can be considered for promotion is not selling your honor.

LMAO!

Here’s to Mr. Moral Universalist, advocating a dual morality. ; P

It is far easier to be a genetic hypocrite than a principled infiltrator

All men, including King James (MR’s “principled” inventor of easy-money yeomanry), are genetic hypocrites.  It’s simply a question of position or degree.

Not even worth debate, actually.

Posted by Fred Scrooby on January 02, 2010, 12:35 PM | #

GT continues in his role here as one of the biggest race-replacement advocates on the internet.  Ever consider moving to the DailyJossHouse, GT?  Or how about the PuffingtonTheMagicNegroPost?  Over there you’ll be among all your spiritual brethren who, like you, are working as hard as they can to torpedo opposition to race-replacement.  You’d be highly looked-up-to at either of those blogs, being a past master at it.  You could give them lessons in how to do it.

Posted by Fred Scrooby on January 02, 2010, 12:37 PM | #

Amy Leigh Barnes thanks you and Ricardo Morrison thanks you, GT.

Posted by Fred Scrooby on January 02, 2010, 02:23 PM | #

By the way, in regard to my comment yesterday of 5:15 AM, it’s a bit strange that Paul Belien has difficulty understanding the real nature of what our overlords are up to, considering he himself heard it all explained to him in person by Vladimir Bukovsky four years ago, as recorded here:

http://www.brusselsjournal.com/node/865 .

Notice that every single one of the predictions Bukovsky made in that interview has come true. 

Belien might do well to go back and carefully re-read his own interview with the great man:  he’ll no longer have so much difficulty accepting the reality of what is afoot, the reality of what our overlords are doing to us and have planned for the future.  Bukovsky spells out the whole deal in black and white, including the way to solve the crisis:  with regard to that last, the way to solve it, this great man and comrade says,

This is why, and I am very frank about it, the sooner we finish with the EU the better.  The sooner it collapses the less damage it will have done to us and to other countries.  But we have to be quick because the Eurocrats are moving very fast.  It will be difficult to defeat them.  Today it is still simple.  If one million people march on Brussels today these guys will run away to the Bahamas.  If tomorrow half of the British population refuses to pay its taxes, nothing will happen and no one will go to jail.  Today you can still do that.  But I do not know what the situation will be tomorrow with a fully fledged Europol staffed by former Stasi or Securitate officers.  Anything may happen.

We are losing time.  We have to defeat them.  We have to sit and think, work out a strategy in the shortest possible way to achieve maximum effect.  Otherwise it will be too late.  So what should I say?  My conclusion is not optimistic.  So far, despite the fact that we do have some anti-EU forces in almost every country, it is not enough.  We are losing and we are wasting time.

We ignore this comrade’s prophetic words at our peril.

Posted by James Bowery on January 02, 2010, 02:52 PM | #

When GT, clarifies his position on centralization of land “title” I may have something to say to him.  Until then, it is quite reasonable impute to him the role of the enemy’s useful idiot.

Posted by slappo on January 03, 2010, 03:05 PM | #

“When the Saxon begins to hate and when the Saxon begins to act on this hate, it will be out of revenge for acts such as this one. “

Yes. Then parents like that girl and girls like her will finally be held accountable for their actions. Is that what you mean?

BTW, Saxons already hate, dude. The thing is, they hate guys like you.

Posted by Dasein on February 01, 2010, 06:00 PM | #

Although they’re not of Amy Barnes, Giles did manage to get hold of some death scene photos.  They’re posted on his site.

Posted by Dasein on May 05, 2010, 01:04 PM | #

Young father has face sliced open in race attack as his terrified son, 5, looks on

A young father was slashed across the face as his five-year-old son looked on in what claimed was a random ‘anti-white’ revenge attack sparked by the murder of an Asian teenager.

Reece Johnson told how he and his son, Tyrel, were walking with Mr Johnson’s girlfriend when a mob of 20 Asian youths surrounded him.

He claims one of the youths said, ‘Your lot killed one of ours’, before he was set upon.

The attack ended when one of the gang sliced open his left cheek with a craft knife.

As Tyrel screamed in horror, his father was left reeling with a giant gaping wound in his face which later needed 68 stitches.

...

‘I was scared for my life. The lads [animals] who attacked me have no respect. My little son was with me - he’s five years old and he was traumatised.

‘He was screaming, clinging on to one of my friend’s legs.’

...

The father-of-three said he and his girlfriend will now move home because they are scared to return to the area.

[IMG]http://i760.photobucket.com/albums/xx249/Aletheia14/article-1272860-096FADB6000005DC-90.jpg[/IMG]

Posted by Bill on May 05, 2010, 02:12 PM | #

Good job I scrolled down as I was just about to post the article by Dasein (above)  May 05, 2010, 05:04 PM

Please read it, it is the comments that are most rewarding.

‘Minorities cannot be racist, only whites are accorded that honour.’  Ground breaking comments here by the Mail methinks.

I expect it will get pulled PDQ.