White nationalism is not enough.

Posted by Fred Scrooby on October 02, 2005, 12:34 PM | #

Søren, could you explain your point more fully?  I’m not sure I follow, exactly.  I’m a green, incidentally—but, I like to think, a sane one, not a wacko one—which, I dare say, most normal people are.  My view of global warming is that if it’s taking place it’s not because of carbon dioxide emissions produced by human activity but is due to some processes poorly understood.

Posted by Fred Scrooby on October 02, 2005, 12:35 PM | #

I meant to put, “due to some natural processes poorly understood.”

Posted by Phil Peterson on October 02, 2005, 05:44 PM | #

Environmentalism doesn’t interest me much .

It is true that I wish to have large tracts of Britain kept free of sprawl so that people like myself who enjoy being in open country and in the wilderness have places left to go to for relaxation and contemplation.

But the engine driving sprawl is immigration - the one thing no eco nut ever talks about. Therefore, environmentalism is fundamentally useless because it won’t address the fundamental cause of environmental degradation in this country - overpopulation driven by immigration.

The Environmentalist movement is fundamentally composed of losers who have nothing better to do with their lives - Leftists who hate large Corporations and vent their anger by staging clownish protests.

I am also in favour of hunting. Fox hunting was a part of English tradition that these losers have now managed to ban. Next, shooting fowl will put you in the Gulag.

So I basically hate the Environmentalists. I couldn’t care less if all them died of the plague tomorrow.

Posted by AD on October 02, 2005, 05:52 PM | #

I am an ecofascist amongst other things, and believe the doctrine of Blut und Boden* should be used to deport traitorous capitalist/commie cosmopolitans at every opportunity rather than letting said capitalists/commies use our philosphies to have strawman debates amongst themselves just because they’re ‘groovy’/useful right now. Attempting to sabotage either the blood or soil of a nation is sufficient grounds for deportation by any moral code.

* for JJR

Posted by TRI on October 02, 2005, 05:59 PM | #

Environmentalism is little more than multiculturalism broadened to other species. I find it hilarious how there are people who won’t watch most TV because it is brainwashing, but somehow Discovery/National Geographic channel is this font of neverending educational truth, enriching our lives.

Environmentalism also makes an excellent tool for selectively impoverishing White Gentile business owners. “He was an eco-terrorist! He deserves to have no assets.”

Since we in the Western World (i.e. Europeans) are supposedly the most evil and exploitative people in the world, we’d better do something about overpopulation by having less kids ourselves.

Thanks Ehrlich, you a-hole.

Posted by AD on October 02, 2005, 06:35 PM | #

Some honest enviro-‘wackos’ who are good friends of ‘wacko’ OZ nationalists:

http://population.org.au/

As for talk of animal rights, being a noble Nietzsche/Evola-esque ubermensch wannabe, i am pro-humane treatment. I have no problem with hunting, it’s a perfectly natural and healthy thing. I have a problem with halal/kosher, people eating cats/dogs , and cramped animal farming. If that doesn’t digust you, you must have non-white admixture.That whole lazy degenerate system has created nations of fat bastards and skinny bastards with obscene guts. If you’re gonna eat it you out of shape prick, at least try catching it yourself and lose a few kgs in the process.There is also a link between anti-racism and animal cruelty.Throughout history, the more a society has valued distinction as opposed to egalitarianism, the better the animals seem to be treated.

Posted by onetwothree on October 02, 2005, 06:40 PM | #

The poor polar bear.  Let’s seize control of the means of production in its honor.

Here is another question in which the only reasonable solution is a transition from oil and coal to nuclear.  But no environmentalist groups are interested in solving the “problem” in any way that doesn’t involve vast new powers/dollars for themselves.

Posted by Andrew L on October 02, 2005, 09:02 PM | #

Exellent Green torture sight http://www.junkscience.com/

Cut the Funding of FRAUD

Posted by Community on October 05, 2007, 01:21 AM | #

We cannot have a healthy society without a healthy ecosystem. Intelligent people know that toxifying & destroying the environment is insane because we ourselves depend on the environment to live, and there is not rational argument that can refute this.

It is OK if you think otherwise, but it’s important that intelligent people ensure you have no platform with which to share your views. Euthanasia is the next logical step.

Because good ideas transcend politics, here is some suggested reading material:

www.nazi.org