“With all our souls”

Forgive me for sharing a bit of old news but I recently came upon a video of a Russian police officer by the name of Alexey Dymovsky speaking openly about the problem of corruption amongst his fellow officers. I don’t understand a lick of Russian but I do understand the gulp in his throat once he started addressing Prime Minister Putin.

[Note: If you can’t see any English subtitles you can click on the embedded video and watch it over at YouTube]

“There must be some moral, some justice?”

Apparently, this man lost his job and had to hire a bodyguard shortly after making this video only to be arrested on charges of fraud several weeks later, wherever he is now his wiki page does not say. I am sure he knew this was coming and that is what makes this video of his an act of courage.

Western men will never be able to reclaim their countries and heritage without also demonstrating such courage.

Posted by Notus Wind on Sunday, August 15, 2010 at 02:28 PM in Oh Tempora, Oh Mores
Comments (5) | Tell a friend

Comments:

Posted by Wandrin on August 15, 2010, 04:00 PM | #

There must be some moral, some justice?

Why must there? Because there must.

This is a good example of the moral idealism thing driving people. I don’t think it’s courage exactly (although it is as well) i think it’s a psychological imperative which they have no choice over because their conscience haunts them until they give in.

I also don’t think our current situation is based on cowardice. I think it’s guilt. It’s a subtle difference but i think White people need to be made less guilty about fighting for their own survival.

Posted by Notus Wind on August 15, 2010, 04:13 PM | #

I also don’t think our current situation is based on cowardice. I think it’s guilt. It’s a subtle difference but i think White people need to be made less guilty about fighting for their own survival.

I am convinced that moral cowardice is a bigger problem for us than guilt.

When I confront conservatives about the reality of our situation they will not disagree with me so much as they will say “I don’t want to go there. I don’t want to think about this.” In my opinion that kind of talk does not come from a sense of guilt but from a sense of moral cowardice. They are afraid to confront the truth.

This is a good example of the moral idealism thing driving people. I don’t think it’s courage exactly (although it is as well) i think it’s a psychological imperative which they have no choice over because their conscience haunts them until they give in.

If that were the case then there would be more people like this former Russian officer. But there aren’t.

Posted by Wandrin on August 15, 2010, 05:32 PM | #

Cross purposes maybe. To me “guilt” is the feeling that comes when someone begins to think about transgressing against the accepted moral authority in some way. I’d say those same conservatives would have reacted the same way if you’d been Galileo trying to persuade them the earth went round the sun - hustling away saying “i don’t want to hear this.” In terms of getting them to listen, increasing their courage or reducing the power of the church would have the same effect i guess so i suppose you could call guilt a particular kind of cowardice. I tend to think guilt and cowardice are somehow different because i’ve known many brave people who found it very hard to transgress against a moral orthodoxy whatever it was.

Posted by Notus Wind on August 16, 2010, 01:00 PM | #

Wandrin,

One man’s guilt is another man’s cowardice. I think the difference between us is just a matter of semantics, a tomato tomahto sort of thing.

But lets not bring Galileo into this…

Posted by Wandrin on August 16, 2010, 03:32 PM | #

But lets not bring Galileo into this…

The psychology is exactly the same.

One group listens and agrees. One group refuses to listen on principle because it goes against the accepted moral authority. One group listens but regardless of whether they agree or not they are guilt-tripped by the accepted moral authority into disagreeing.

The nationalist situation today is analogous to any kind of medieval heretic going up against the church.

Facts and being right are important but more important is undermining the accepted moral authority.

For example, undermining the moral authority of the church on some completely unrelated issue, say priests having mistresses, would help Galileo persuade people that the earth went round the sun.

Next entry: Morality Critique part 1

Previous entry: Radio - Matt Parrott

Existential Issues

White Genocide Project

Of note

General News

Science News

Science Categories

All Categories

The Writers

Each author's name links to a list of all articles posted by the writer; the hashes link to authors' homepages.

Links

Endorsement not implied.

Controlled Opposition

Crime

General

Immigration

Islam

Jews

Nationalist Political Parties

Science

Whites in Africa