Comments posted

Page 1 of 3466 pages  1 2 3 >  Last ›

Thorn wrote:

Deleted. Thorn is a troll.

This comment appeared in entry 'Salter: Accept that the State is no longer ours and rebuild radically of our people' on 09/22/14, 06:12 PM. (go to entry to post a reply)

Jimmy Marr wrote:

Thanks for posting the link to my Renegade show. I’ll be talking with Nick Spero at Circus Maximus on Thursday:

http://www.circusmaximusshow.com/

I find my new life as a retarded mule very gratifying. I was too old to reproduce anyway.

This comment appeared in entry 'Animal faith' on 09/22/14, 03:31 PM. (go to entry to post a reply)

DanielS wrote:


The touching story of how a beautiful white girl sacrifices her life to save her mulatto baby from its abusive sire.

This comment appeared in entry 'WHITE WOMEN FOR SALE!' on 09/22/14, 01:01 PM. (go to entry to post a reply)

Leon Haller wrote:

Is there any feeling in Scotland or the UK that this vote may have been rigged? I’d like to hear from Brits what’s being said “on the ground”.

This comment appeared in entry 'It's no. It's Devo-Max. Plus a sop to the English?' on 09/22/14, 06:46 AM. (go to entry to post a reply)

DanielS wrote:

“Posted by jamesUK on September 22, 2014, 02:24 AM | #

@JamesUK

  I hate to say it but you are starting to come across as a trouble-maker.

How so? Is it because of John DeNugent and the alien theory or the WN affection to Hitler and National Socialism?”

It is because you are pestering me - trolling it now seems evident - to discuss these things as if they are a necessary corollary to the advocacy of European peoples when I have been clear that they have nothing to do with this platform.

John DeNugent advocates Hitler and some bizarre conspiracy theories. He is irrelevant to MR. Some people, who call themselves WN, commend Hitler and “national socialism” as it manifest under Hitler’s auspices. MR does not.

Stop pestering with these questions, they have been asked and answered.

“Just look at Don Blacks Stormfront that proves my point”

I don’t go there. I may have been a bit too favorable of him in the recent post reviewing WN figures that you requested (i.e., he and his cohorts may be - probably are - still too Hitler friendly and all that), but I wanted to point out that he is fairly normal and reasonable compared to others.

  “Who cares about John DeNugent?

He is an important WN leader and one of the longest running who also one of the very few to run for political office in the US.”

He is not important here.

“There was a video series which he covers his political run including news extracts on his site and YouTube before it was taken down by MIB(?).”

Anyone interested is free to look into John DeNugent. He does not fit into MR’s platform and sphere of serious concern.

I am beginning to wonder if you want it to be true in order to make White/European advocacy seem ridiculous.

“Lol! I don’t have to that they do it themselves remember The Order, Sikh temple shooting, Kevin Alfred Strom, the Holocaust museum shooting and former Order member Glen Millers jewish shooting?”

You’ve bundled a number of things here, none of which have anything much to do with MR.

Regarding the Order: The 14 words of David Lane and some of his writings and positions are inspiring. He/they made some mistakes no doubt. Killing Alan Berg was foolish. But I wanted to call attention to the fact that he was denouncing “the right” for those who insist upon that rubric while extolling the 14 words. I was personally moved by his experience as one who had sacrificed his life for White women but had received almost no appreciation from them in jail whereas imprisoned black murderers of innocent Whites could receive a great deal of support from White women.

Regarding Bob Mathews, some of his platform was on the right tack and I wanted to draw attention to the fact that what he was attempting was fairly analogous to what Pilsudski had done, which is now institutionalized and normalized as national heroism - not utterly ridiculous as you would apparently try to make it seem.

That you would bring the Sikh temple shooting into the equation just goes to show what type of thing, bizarre nonsense, you are trying to associate with this discourse. That is entirely irrelevant….same with the Holocaust museum shooting, Kevin Strom…and we have addressed Glen Miller as well. (Though Miller did some effective interviews) we do not commend these people. Stop pestering.

“Wasn’t Don Black and Duke involved with some scandal overseas to help support mercenaries in an African or Caribbean country or something?”

I believe Don Black and a few people tried to take-over the island of Dominica. He was arrested and spent time in jail for that. And so what? You’ve got me regretting that I discussed him with you as it seems you are trying to tie him together as having agreement from MR somehow.

MR’s platform is clear, so is the platform of these peoples that you list. You can plainly see the difference for yourself without pestering me for an explanation of each of these people’s tangled theories, lives and deeds.

White and Nationalism are not words owned separately or together by people who advocate Hitler, Jesus, supremacism or crazy theories and methods.

What I mean by White is “of European extraction.” Nationalism designates the biological borders of a people and the political borders of lands which would be theirs. MR can advocate that in good conscience.

This comment appeared in entry 'Why Hitler hated Jews' on 09/22/14, 04:14 AM. (go to entry to post a reply)

jamesUK wrote:

Correction meant to type @DanielS not jamesUK

This comment appeared in entry 'Why Hitler hated Jews' on 09/22/14, 02:26 AM. (go to entry to post a reply)

jamesUK wrote:

@JamesUK

I hate to say it but you are starting to come across as a trouble-maker.

How so? Is it because of John DeNugent and the alien theory or the WN affection to Hitler and National Socialism?

Just look at Don Blacks Stormfront that proves my point

Who cares about John DeNugent?

He is an important WN leader and one of the longest running who also one of the very few to run for political office in the US.

There was a video series which he covers his political run including news extracts on his site and YouTube before it was taken down by MIB(?). 

Though I am beginning to wonder if you want it to be true in order to make White/European advocacy seem ridiculous.

Lol! I don’t have to that they do it themselves remember The Order, Sikh temple shooting, Kevin Alfred Strom, the Holocaust museum shooting and former Order member Glen Millers jewish shooting?

Wasn’t Don Black and Duke involved with some scandal overseas to help support mercenaries in an African or Caribbean country or something?

This comment appeared in entry 'Why Hitler hated Jews' on 09/22/14, 02:24 AM. (go to entry to post a reply)

DanielS wrote:

It seems that I’m getting some negative feedback for not “naming the Jew” in this post, which strikes me as absurd. MR’s platform has built into it as a fundamental pillar that Jews are Other - they are not a part of our advocacy group.

All I was intending with this post was to present state-of-the-art concerns that Frank Salter had brought forth. It is verbatim and was not my intent to editorialize. Here is the comment section and I am not trying to stop anyone from talking about Jews.

In fact, not only is it a part of MR’s platform that Jews are other, the number 7 is kept ready-to-its-hand as representing the key choke-points of the most key antagonists to the interests of European peoples. Thus, who and where our hermenetuic survey and vigil must check and attend most often. That number representing key niches largely controlled by Jewish interests:

1. Academia/“intellectualism”/professional disciplines

2. Banking/finance

3. Law/courts

4. Politics

5. Media/news and entertainment

6. Religion

7. Business/Corporations/Military Industrial


That someone like Blair has had his strings pulled is a given, taken for granted. Of course that doesn’t mean traitors should not be held accountable; and that that is not a valid concern. It is more than valid. We must attend to our own, not just Jews.

However, of our people, WWS recently drew an interesting distinction that I’d never considered.

That between the struggle and genetics.

Roughly, the White working-class are the ones who struggle most and as such, represent the greatest threat to the elite traitors and Jewish interests (thus, are a special target of Jewish antagonism), whereas those who rely on genetics alone are susceptible to become “effete snobs”, significant traitors thereby.

This comment appeared in entry 'Salter: Accept that the State is no longer ours and rebuild radically of our people' on 09/22/14, 12:13 AM. (go to entry to post a reply)

Guest Blogger wrote:

Jimmy Marr opens up ...dispute with “Bugs” cadre and more..

http://www.blogtalkradio.com/renegadebroadcasting/2014/09/21/renegade-roundtable

Jimmy mentions that his dispute with the Bugs people happened after a rally on April 20th.

Whether the dispute happened over the tactic of not naming the Jew in every instance or over the Bugs people not wanting to be associated with a rally for April 20th makes an important difference.

This comment appeared in entry 'Animal faith' on 09/21/14, 10:56 PM. (go to entry to post a reply)

DanielS wrote:

JamesUK,

I hate to say it but you are starting to come across as a trouble-maker.

Who cares about John DeNugent?

Regarding the notion that “most American WN are pro-Hitler”, even if true, that is not necessarily a permanent condition nor is it something to be accepted as a correct position - it is not. Though I am beginning to wonder if you want it to be true in order to make White/European advocacy seem ridiculous.

Nor is MR going the Jared Taylor way. I am not among those who views him with contempt, but his platform is insufficient. By the way, I would add “unamusement park” (1/4 Jewish and it shows in his concerns) to the list of controlled opposition.

It is simply not true that there is no room for other angles than the ones you sketch.

Hitler may have teamed-up with Britain as the islanders are sharing much DNA with Germans, but it goes to a point that I have sought to address - that closer relation does not guarantee cooperation.

I suspect that the Brits had hard feelings still regarding WWI and thought, “oh, not again.”

Not that they did not have strategic objectives along with perhaps less noble motives and foreign infiltrators angling to provoke war, but they probably noted the immorality of Hitler’s position as well.

And when Hitler said NS was not for export, he meant that a decent regard for the whole of his people did not extend to other European, non-Germanics to the east, in particular.

This comment appeared in entry 'Why Hitler hated Jews' on 09/21/14, 10:16 AM. (go to entry to post a reply)

jamesUK wrote:

@DanielS

Well Hitler in his secret foreign policy book discovered and published after the war and according to David Irving speaking to Hitler’s staff and members of the regime after WW2 was pro-British Empire even willing to go against his WW2 allies for a peace treaty with Britain that he envisioned according to his foreign policy book Britain and Germany ruling over Europe. 

Most WN although they may not be Nazis are pro-Hitler/Nazi especially in the US like William Pearce and Don Black that not being pro-Hitler is usually the exception to the rule like Jarod Taylor who is focussed on purely racial issues and trying to gain greater credibility. 

What about the disappearance of John DeNugent and the alien conspiracy?

 

This comment appeared in entry 'Why Hitler hated Jews' on 09/21/14, 09:46 AM. (go to entry to post a reply)

DanielS wrote:

“Poor Majority Rights.  It’s attracted trolls who rant red herrings and anti-Hitler zombies whose stupid voice recordings turn themselves on at random.  Does Majority Rights stand for anything?”


Majority Rights is not poor, dear MOB. It is very happy, still shedding former trolls and not yet having gotten its new direction off the ground, though about it.

MR stands for all European peoples and their discreet nations, natives and kinds (innocent until proven guilty, anyway).

It rejects the viewpoint that we ought to include Jews in our interest group. Jews are not included in the classification of our peoples.

In that regard, its provides a platform free of the Jewish affectations of Christianity, rightfully attending to the moral concerns of those who cannot pretend to believe in Christianity, but seek rather a moral order more closely approximating our E.G.I. and reverence inspiring loyalty thereby.

In service of all Europeans and respect for their discreet kinds, it recognizes that Hitler cannot serve as a uniting figure. That he could be is the wishful thinking of some, who will put on blinders and earplugs for that wish, ignoring Hitler’s own words, that he did not respect national boundaries and peoples besides Germans and to a lesser extent Germanics, but would kill them if necessary to take their lands up to the Urals. National boundaries, to Hitler, were merely what the people could and should assert by their will and force. The designs he spoke of repeatedly could not make it more clear that his was no defensive war - he was the imperialist aggressor, by design, against other Europeans - he is clear about that in his words from Mein Kampf to Table Talk; in his actions from taking all of Czechoslovakia after the Sudetenland was conceded, to bombing the cities of nations who could have been his peaceful neighbors and allies in Jewish deportation. But Hitler was a conventional military man with dreams of becoming an even greater Friedrich the Great; that was his world view and his philosophy was all about making excuses for the “necessity” of his militarism - a militarism that did not respect other Europeans, people who fought in defense of their nations just as Germans would; an aggression by Hitler that wound up costing 55 million European lives.

It is only common respect to expect those who wish to point out his reasons, to acknowledge things he did well, to preface talk of him with a caveat as to his epistemological blunders, to acknowledge that his platform was insufficient as a moral order for Europeans to cooperate and rally.

Such is not the case for MR: MR advocates all Europeans and their nationalisms. We include Germans and German nationalism, whereas Hitler and Nazism does not respect other Europeans and their national bounds. Poor Hitler, poor advocates of Hitler, not poor Majority Rights.

We have the moral high ground.

This comment appeared in entry 'Why Hitler hated Jews' on 09/20/14, 11:39 PM. (go to entry to post a reply)

jamesUK wrote:

What’s happened to John DeNugent? His website has been down for a number of days and seems to no longer exist including his mirror back up sites?

http://johndenugent.com/

Maybe he was right about the whole Nordic/Grey Alien-Nazi 4th Reich conspiracy and the Men in Black got him.

13) Nordic Aliens have abducted entire White American families and taken them to beautiful planets to work in agriculture and forestry, fearing that earth WILL be destroyed but desiring that White earthlings should be preserved. They are however kept at 1940s technology because Earthlings tend toward ego, violence, and misusing technology to make devastating weapons and, through pollution, to destroy their own environment to get rich quick.

14)  A Gray-Reptilian alliance enslaved many planets with a HAARP-like mind control and neurochemicals, making them into programmed transhumans without free will, slaves and soldiers in their war machine.

The Nordic Aliens were forced to obliterate all life on those many planets and then restore those planets painstakingly so they could again host life.

15) The Nordic Aliens wish the Fourth Reich to take care of the problems on this planet.

https://web.archive.org/web/20140904162700/http://www.johndenugent.com/

If they evil greys have an alliance with the US and the NWO and the Nordics are allied with 4th Reich Nazis and are preparing for a war then we are truly fucked.

This comment appeared in entry 'Why Hitler hated Jews' on 09/20/14, 09:02 PM. (go to entry to post a reply)

MOB wrote:

Poor Majority Rights.  It’s attracted trolls who rant red herrings and anti-Hitler zombies whose stupid voice recordings turn themselves on at random.  Does Majority Rights stand for anything?

The Jews can’t stop themselves. They can’t stop taking, taking, taking over.  The only way to survive living with them in your midst is to tune out. I’m a life-long classical music lover. I have had to stop listening to National Public Radio, which owns the only radio stations that still broadcast it.  I’ve had to stop because the Jewishness is pervasive.  Jews can’t create music worth listening to, but they “made it their own,” as they do everything, by taking over every single aspect of playing, directing, producing, training, programming, concertizing—everything—relating to the life of classical music.  They did the same to Art.  “Public” Television is as overwhelmingly Jew-infested as “Public” radio.  There’s nothing “public” about them; they are by, for, and about Jews, day after day; being Jews is the Jews’ only business; everything else is incidental to that.  Jews make life not worth living for Gentiles of quality. 

This comment appeared in entry 'Why Hitler hated Jews' on 09/20/14, 06:20 PM. (go to entry to post a reply)

Francis wrote:

More Art Nouveau here…

http://www.wikiart.org/en/koloman-moser/poster-for-fromme-s-calendar-1899

Always liked her.  Reminds me of someone I used to date…

This comment appeared in entry 'Animal faith' on 09/20/14, 01:48 PM. (go to entry to post a reply)

Guest Blogger wrote:

Colin Liddell’s take on the vote

http://www.radixjournal.com/vanguard-radio/2014/9/20/the-wandering-scot

This comment appeared in entry 'It's no. It's Devo-Max. Plus a sop to the English?' on 09/20/14, 12:32 PM. (go to entry to post a reply)

Guest Blogger wrote:

“How and when will we know when all is won or lost?”

In this discussion, Frank Salter suggests that when the laws regarding immigration are changed to favor native peoples such that those who have betrayed those laws, such as Tony Blair with his immigration policy, are criminalized, put on trial and prosecuted for treason.

This comment appeared in entry 'Britain's Camp of The Saints' on 09/20/14, 09:42 AM. (go to entry to post a reply)

Guest Blogger wrote:

Frank Salter on Red Ice, September 19, 2014

http://www.redicecreations.com/radio/2014/09/RIR-140919.php

This comment appeared in entry 'Britain's Camp of The Saints' on 09/20/14, 08:21 AM. (go to entry to post a reply)

Radon wrote:

The English make up 12% of the Scottish population and 3/4 of those voted ‘no’.

This comment appeared in entry 'It's no. It's Devo-Max. Plus a sop to the English?' on 09/19/14, 08:14 PM. (go to entry to post a reply)

DanielS wrote:

Maybe not true that Ron named his son (who is worse than Ron) after Ayn Rand - a small point that you apparently wish to make into an important issue - and it may as well be true as the rest of it is true - Austrian school, objectivism, libertarianism, open borders, Martin Luther King Holiday, no account ..etc.

This comment appeared in entry 'It's no. It's Devo-Max. Plus a sop to the English?' on 09/19/14, 03:50 PM. (go to entry to post a reply)

charles allcock wrote:

The Jews dominant and favoured position stems from their control of the banks and money supply. From this they can do anything they want. They can buy and control the media, take over any business they wish, buy the best education, and so on and on. And they don’t give a shirt for anyone else.

This comment appeared in entry 'Why Hitler hated Jews' on 09/19/14, 03:06 PM. (go to entry to post a reply)

jamesUK wrote:

What a bunch of cowards most Scots are that I knew they would not say yes as that would take balls and initiative that was not even close with the NO campaign winning by 10%.

At least England will keep George Galloway and the Respect Party.

This comment appeared in entry 'It's no. It's Devo-Max. Plus a sop to the English?' on 09/19/14, 01:40 PM. (go to entry to post a reply)

jamesUK wrote:

@DanielS

He is a libertarian, Austrian school (Jewish Objectivism - even named his son after Ayn Rand)

Actually that’s not true that is said by idiots like Don Black whose own son went against him contacting the SPLC and denouncing the so called white nationalist movement. Lol!

http://www.thedailybeast.com/articles/2013/07/29/derek-black-the-reluctant-racist-and-his-exit-from-white-nationalism.html

Rand is not named after Ayn Rand but is short for Randal.

Rand or Randal talking about his name. 

http://youtu.be/oD-R_OeP6tU

This comment appeared in entry 'It's no. It's Devo-Max. Plus a sop to the English?' on 09/19/14, 01:31 PM. (go to entry to post a reply)

Guessedworker wrote:

Meanwhile, children, the Tory peer and patron Lord Ashcroft, who runs his very own polling agency, has found evidence that neither women nor some late swing explains the No victory but a fear of losing Sterling:

http://www.telegraph.co.uk/active/11109126/Fear-of-the-financial-future-turned-Scotland-away-from-independence.html

Losing the pound was the most important factor for Scottish voters as they rejected independence, according to polling carried out by the Conservative peer Lord Ashcroft in the aftermath of the referendum.

The poll suggests that Scotland’s First Minister Alex Salmond’s failed to convince voters that an independence Scotland would have a successful financial future.

In the hours after the polling stations closed, more than 2,000 people were asked what finally made up their mind after the months of sometimes bitter campaigning.

The polling provides an early snapshot of the decision-making process of the Scottish electorate.

In the end, it seemed the Scots took a prosaic approach to independence, with their decisions being driven by the risks associated with “the currency, EU membership, the economy, jobs and prices”.

For those who believe that it is (usually) the economy, stupid, this has the ring of truth.  A lot of us found it difficult to believe that the Yes Campaign, who have had decades to plan for this, really didn’t understand the macro-economics or have any kind of credible plan in place.

This comment appeared in entry 'It's no. It's Devo-Max. Plus a sop to the English?' on 09/19/14, 08:41 AM. (go to entry to post a reply)

Jimmy Marr wrote:

Scottish referendum was enough to get me out of the house for a bit last night. I played bodhran behind the piper at an Irish pub as we awaited the results.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Ib_W0CA239w

This comment appeared in entry 'Animal faith' on 09/19/14, 07:18 AM. (go to entry to post a reply)

Leon Haller wrote:

“Who is DanielS to define what MR is, or what perspectives it allows?” - Haller

I am the one who GW asked to take ownership of the site

- DanielS

This comment appeared in entry 'It's no. It's Devo-Max. Plus a sop to the English?' on 09/19/14, 06:40 AM. (go to entry to post a reply)

DanielS wrote:

Most native nationalists are hopeful that Farage will play at least the provisional role he might of independence from the EU; most have serious reservations about his platform, but despite that skepticism* wish him luck for at least that provisional function of rupture that will allow a means for true nationalism. Having followed Leon for a while, just about anything he endorses raises the antenna of suspicion of a means-in for the corrupt.

* To the extent skepticism of Farage might be exaggerated and he is rather sincerely concerned for English interests, wonderful. Perhaps he is the lesser of the evils, but it is for MR to maintain a vigil on native interests where Farage may be all too liberal and making concessions too large.

This comment appeared in entry 'It's no. It's Devo-Max. Plus a sop to the English?' on 09/19/14, 06:15 AM. (go to entry to post a reply)

Guessedworker wrote:

The next opportunity to challenge the political Establishment will be on 14th October, when two Westminster by-elections will be held.  The important one is Clacton-on-Sea, where the former Conservative eurosceptic Douglas Carswell is defending a large majority and looks set to greatly increase it, becoming UKIP’s first elected MP:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Clacton_by-election,_2014

The other one is Heywood & Middleton:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Heywood_and_Middleton_by-election,_2014

Yes, that’s this Heywood:

http://majorityrights.com/weblog/comments/two_hundred_vigilantes_in_revenge_attack_on_moslem_shops_in_heywood

The seat, which is being contested through the death of the sitting MP, looks safe for Labour.  UKIP only managed an entry-level perfomance in 2010.  The BNP, however, which took 7%, is not standing this time.  Given the collapse of the LibDems and the likely customary hemorrhage of votes from the Tories, the UKIP candidate could, perhaps should take second.  Obviously, a win would send shock waves through the entire system.

This comment appeared in entry 'It's no. It's Devo-Max. Plus a sop to the English?' on 09/19/14, 06:01 AM. (go to entry to post a reply)

Guessedworker wrote:

Nigel Farage’s post-Indyref pro-English line:

http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/uknews/scottish-independence/11108465/Nigel-Farage-England-ignored-in-Scottish-independence-debate.html

... a constitutional convention.

This comment appeared in entry 'It's no. It's Devo-Max. Plus a sop to the English?' on 09/19/14, 05:38 AM. (go to entry to post a reply)

DanielS wrote:

Posted by Leon Haller on September 19, 2014, 04:35 AM | #

What is wrong with Rpn Paul (from your perspective, he ought to be a hero - he was one of the Congressmen MOST antagonistic to the “special relationship” with Israel)?

He is a libertarian, Austrian school (Jewish Objectivism - even named his son after Ayn Rand), little in the way of cultural accountability, throws one bone (end The Fed) from a platform that is known to fail or play into the hands of Jewish plutocrats and White sell-outs, lets Jewish elites, cultural corruptors off the hook unaccountable etc etc. kisses “anti-racist” ass, does nothing to stop immigration.

“Peter Schiff is excellent when discussing economic fundamentals.”

Is Jewish, a gold promoter. Gold is a Jewish game.

Prove that I am a “paid troll”.

If you are not, may as well be.

Or just keep repeating that crap, in the hopes that it will stick.

You roll in your own crap, no need to make it stick.

Actually, I think there is a possibility that DanielS is some kind of troll, though an ineffective one.

Not paid, not a troll, have not gotten our project off the ground yet, let alone having a track record that you can condemn (one of the key aspects of having the platform off the ground is having your trolling out of here).

“His mission was to infiltrate MR and so de-intellectualize it”

Sure. Anti-intellectual (for onlookers, see my last comment).

“that all or almost of all of the best persons associated with it have fled (with a few who wouldn’t leave being driven away).”

Nobody worthwhile has left on my account.

“I think Daniel has such a “hard-on” for me because, at some deep level, he realizes that he is so very badly intellectually and cognitively outclassed.”

Leon, I do not mind intelligent, educated people..people who know more than me about things…I welcome them IF they are on the same fundamental page and do not undermine our editorial platform.

There is no other rational explanation. Anti-Christianity and willful economic ignorance are insufficient.

You have continuously attempted to assert editorial prerogative here - Catholic, Jewish friendly, Austrian school perspective - a perspective which is far from MR’s. You have been asked (repeatedly) to leave and go to a site amenable to your views. There is no place for you or others to judge until we have taken our direction without your trolling interference. And even then, there is no place for you to judge us by criteria of yours which we are not trying to assimilate. There is every reason for you to start a website elsewhere, to your liking, UNLESS you are a troll who does not want people to hear from our perspective (which is at wide odds to yours).

This comment appeared in entry 'It's no. It's Devo-Max. Plus a sop to the English?' on 09/19/14, 05:22 AM. (go to entry to post a reply)

Leon Haller wrote:

What is wrong with Rpn Paul (from your perspective, he ought to be a hero - he was one of the Congressmen MOST antagonistic to the “special relationship” with Israel)? Peter Schiff is excellent when discussing economic fundamentals.

Prove that I am a “paid troll”. Or just keep repeating that crap, in the hopes that it will stick. Actually, I think there is a possibility that DanielS is some kind of troll, though an ineffective one. His mission was to infiltrate MR and so de-intellectualize it that all or almost of all of the best persons associated with it have fled (with a few who wouldn’t leave being driven away).

I think Daniel has such a “hard-on” for me because, at some deep level, he realizes that he is so very badly intellectually and cognitively outclassed. There is no other rational explanation. Anti-Christianity and willful economic ignorance are insufficient.

This comment appeared in entry 'It's no. It's Devo-Max. Plus a sop to the English?' on 09/19/14, 04:35 AM. (go to entry to post a reply)

Guessedworker wrote:

Anthony Wells of YouGov puts the result down to “late swing (which is probably accounted for by Gordon Brown’s intervention, with free jam).  Wells doesn’t say whether women were particularly conspicuous among the change-voters.

http://ukpollingreport.co.uk/blog/archives/9005

As I write there is still one council to declare, but the maths mean that the overall result is going to be Yes 45%, No 55%. So, how did the polls do?

The final pre-election polls had all tightly converged around the same figures – Yes 48%, No 52%, with every company was within one point of this. In fact the level of No support was three points higher than this. For a single poll a three point error would be within the margin of error, but every poll being off in the same direction suggests some systemic error.

A possibility is the shy noes/enthusiastic yesses we discussed before the referendum, but on the face of it a simpler explanation is just late swing. The YouGov recontact survey on the day, going back to the same people they interviewed in their final survey found enough movement between final survey to actually voting to take the figures to YES 46%, NO 54%, one point from the actual result and enough to explain the apparent divergence. From that it looks as though no was going to win anyway, but there was a further movement from yes to no when people actually got to the polling station.

This comment appeared in entry 'It's no. It's Devo-Max. Plus a sop to the English?' on 09/19/14, 04:13 AM. (go to entry to post a reply)

DanielS wrote:

“Martin Kettle puts the No victory down to the risk-averse, security-seeking female mind”

That makes sense according to Carol Gilligan’s assessment of differing “moralities” between males and females in “In a Different Voice.”

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/In_a_Different_Voice


Women generally fear people separating, viewing moral order in terms of webs of caring relations.

Men generally fear people being forced together, viewing moral order in terms of rights and justice.

This comment appeared in entry 'It's no. It's Devo-Max. Plus a sop to the English?' on 09/19/14, 03:47 AM. (go to entry to post a reply)

Guessedworker wrote:

Martin Kettle puts the No victory down to the risk-averse, security-seeking female mind:

http://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2014/sep/19/scottish-independence-union-survived-put-away-flags

The win ... was decisive. It looks like a 54%-46% or thereabouts. That’s not as good as it looked like being a couple of months ago. But it’s a lot more decisive than the recent polls had hinted. Second, it was women who saved the union. In the polls, men were decisively in favour of yes. The yes campaign was in some sense a guy thing. Men wanted to make a break with the Scotland they inhabit. Women didn’t. Third, this was to a significant degree a class vote too. Richer Scotland stuck with the union — so no did very well in a lot of traditonal SNP areas. Poorer Scotland, Labour Scotland, slipped towards yes, handing Glasgow, Dundee and North Lanarkshire to the independence camp.

There will now be a hiatus for a few weeks while the Scottish Labour Establishment works out with the coalition government how to give the Scots the parliamentary powers and cash it promised during the late, desperate phase of its campaign.  Always lurking in the background is English discontent.  If they try a second time to dismember England into regions, or even to hive off English cities, they will be defeated.

This comment appeared in entry 'It's no. It's Devo-Max. Plus a sop to the English?' on 09/19/14, 03:20 AM. (go to entry to post a reply)

DanielS wrote:

What better place for the paid troll, Leon Haller, to promote a campaign to co-opt European-nativist interests and direct them back into the powers-that-be (e.g., through the UKIP)?

and “just how independent is UKIP itself?

http://www.identitariancongress.org/blog/2013/4/24/were-only-making-plans-for-nigel

The man wearing the pink shirt is billionaire James Beeland Rogers Jr., a business partner of George Soros, while the man with his arm around Farage is investment broker Peter Schiff. Also in the frame is Ron Paul. All in all, a very nice and cozy group shot that serves to remind us that independence from Europe may not necessarily mean independence for the UK.”....or for England.

When are you going to make the last post that you were offered here Leon?

Majority Rights already is, and has been, promoting independence for the native English (a fact that Leon has tried to sweep aside, bury, and now to co-opt). MR may step-up this campaign, but it will be WITHOUT Leon Haller.

Leon will be starting his own site promoting “White Zion”, Austrian School economics, Catholicism, warm-friendly relations with Jewish American professionals and mulatto women as a consolation to disenfranchised Whites who manage to hang-on.

This comment appeared in entry 'It's no. It's Devo-Max. Plus a sop to the English?' on 09/19/14, 01:09 AM. (go to entry to post a reply)

Page 1 of 3466 pages  1 2 3 >  Last ›