Comments posted

Page 1 of 3492 pages  1 2 3 >  Last ›

Let the Jews fight Isis wrote:

Let the Jews fight Isis. It’s their creation.

This comment appeared in entry 'French Re-Revolution, C'est la Guerre!' on 03/04/15, 10:08 AM. (go to entry to post a reply)

On Neil Vodavzny wrote:

Maybe, I don’t fully understand Neil Vodavzny’s role here, he has some good ideas and some positions that I would not endorse, but I think GW posts him as a potential bridge to those who are not yet converted to European activism.

This comment appeared in entry 'Pay attention' on 03/04/15, 10:05 AM. (go to entry to post a reply)

Tom Raymond wrote:

It’s sad how these terrorists ignore the most basic human decency—but it was frankly encouraging to see that the magazine, and the French people, wouldn’t just lie down and die.

One of the best tools against these arrogant people is humiliating their pompous self-importance:

A large group of ISIS fighters in Iraq are moving down a road when they hear a voice call from behind a sand dune: “One Marine is better than ten ISIS fighters”.

The ISIS commander quickly orders 10 of his best men over the dune where a gun-battle breaks out and continues for a few minutes, then silence.

The voice once again calls out: “One Marine is better than one hundred ISIS “S.O.B.s”.

Furious, the ISIS commander sends his next best 100 troops over the dune and instantly a huge gun fight commences. After 10 minutes of battle, again silence.

The voice calls out again: “One Marine is better than a thousand ISIS fighters.”
The enraged ISIS commander musters 1000 fighters and sends them to the other side of the dune. Rifle fire, machine guns, grenades, rockets and cannon fire ring out as a terrible battle is fought …. Then silence.

Eventually one badly wounded ISIS fighter crawls back over the dune and with his dying words tells his commander,

“Don’t send any more men… it’s a trap.
There’s two of them.”

Read more:

This comment appeared in entry 'French Re-Revolution, C'est la Guerre!' on 03/04/15, 09:56 AM. (go to entry to post a reply)

Tom Raymond wrote:

Isn’t it possible that the original article was, in fact, satire?

This comment appeared in entry 'Pay attention' on 03/04/15, 09:44 AM. (go to entry to post a reply)

On Graham Lister wrote:

Perhaps it is premature to suggest and wrong to pre-empt GW in relating the NEWS, but Graham Lister may have taken the step beyond.

We hope that we are mistaken, but unfortunately, there are clues to believe that it may be the case that he is not merely gone from MR.

This comment appeared in entry 'MR Radio: Greg Johnson talks to GW and Daniel' on 03/04/15, 09:12 AM. (go to entry to post a reply)

Red Ice Speaking Puerto Rican wrote:

Red Ice, speaking like true Puerto Ricans:

Justin Garcia comes to Red Ice to pander to a universalist, female point of view, so that we can all learn how to act like Peurto Ricans or Brazilian Mulattoes.

At least in terms of a point that I am trying to make, a point is missed in all of this by both GW and Bowery (I bring Bowery into this in particular, because this Garcia guy apparently came to Red Ice by way of him): GW has said that men becoming more masculine and women becoming more feminine is ideal; Bowery would apparently say something similar.

Here is what they are not seeing in what I am saying - Aristotle’s recognition that as biological creatures, lets say systems, that we are evolved for optimal levels of need satisfaction.

Thus, GW’s and Bowery’s prescription would not be correct as it would call strictly for maximization of the gender/sex roles.

Now hear me: I am not saying men should be effeminate, and that there should not be some very masculine men; just that that is not the whole deal in terms of optimal systematization of European masculinity in particular.

It is not only my own father and older brother’s taking the masculine bit too far that causes pause for reflection, but they did, to begin, because, like Bowery, they were against words and talking; this begins to obstruct necessary intellectualism even, not nonsense. I suspect Bowery takes being able to talk for granted.

Another clue that males can be too masculine came through my experience with blacks. Do women like confidence, as Elana says? Yes. Are they inclined to black men? Apparently a percentage are. Nobody is more confident than black males.

Does that mean White men should become like blacks? Obviously not. Is the problem strictly with White men not being as confident as blacks?

Obviously it is all far more subtle than that, and confidence requires more social confirmation of our somewhat more circumspect form of masculinity as European men; and a way to get women to appreciate that or at least be accountable to it as it has been good enough for 41,000 years.

Suddenly it is not and it is all the fault of White men? The food we eat? They don’t appreciate Karate movies enough, the way that Puerto Ricans do? I don’t think so.

Confidence might be maximized in some universalized sense that Elana might suggest, and that is the royal road to mudsharkdom - Puerto Rico and Brazil.

You are going to be “confident” when woman after woman that you talk to in initial interaction cannot fathom how anyone could be so “racist” as to not want to be involved with blacks?

Jews pander to a puerile White female predilection as such, to be sure.

But as Europeans, as intelligent people, confidence is subject to the strictures of optimality - should we be confident about something? Should I be confident that it is necessary to talk about how Heidegger was playing a game against Aristotle’s “theoria, praxis and poesis” when trying to bring it up to Greg Johnson? Yes, but it is hard when I have to fight to make this fundamental point because Aristotle is not recognized as being of central importance here.

Quite unlike Nietzsche, and his homosexual infatuation with masculinity; quite unlike Jack Donovan, whom Garcia also mentions a few time as a level headed proponent of masculinity, and his similar homosexual infatuation with masculinity.

And ultimately, there is no mention in this conversation of the special quality of European masculinity, which is in an optimal range of the most creative intelligence. Authentic European masculinity has to be in balance with the empathy and intellectual forethought and planning that is native to our masculinity, in addition to sufficient self assertion.

Nor is there any critique of a tendency in some of our co-evolutionaries to go along with Jewish pandering, prescriptions to have them acting like black women, acting like aggressive and hostile pigs. Our women are most amazing as they naturally are, as are our men, if understood properly.

It is our group and its optimal range that has to be appreciated and defended in its optimal form - not masculinity, of itself universalized and maximized.

Fuck Puerto Rico, Fuck Africans and Fuck Jews - you want me to fight? yeah, I’ll fight, but not for some dumb bitch who only cares about some slavishly maximized, a-historical, universalized form of “masculinity”

This comment appeared in entry 'MR Radio: Greg Johnson talks to GW and Daniel' on 03/04/15, 07:46 AM. (go to entry to post a reply)

voznich wrote:

That color picture shows some incredibly ugly Jews.

I still say let the Jews and Muslims kill each other all day, it’s none of our business.

We don’t want to live with either group, and we don’t want to enter into their sectarian battles.

What whites need is separation from everyone not white.

This comment appeared in entry '"To ensure that Wikipedia is Zionist in nature"' on 03/04/15, 07:24 AM. (go to entry to post a reply)

darmian wrote:

Other than these platform issues, there can be a few reasons for people to shy away - Perhaps both GW and I can be too critical for some, but we are accountable and we advocate all Europeans and their discreet kinds.

That could be your problem right there. At this point, I’m more inclined to trust the EU in fostering European identity than I am any of the pseudo-White (but really ethno-sectarian) movements with narrow views.

Historically, any European cooperation had to be brought by the sword or the church. Expecting proles to see the big picture is pointless.


This comment appeared in entry 'MR Radio: Greg Johnson talks to GW and Daniel' on 03/04/15, 07:00 AM. (go to entry to post a reply)

Love your enemy, weapon against sociopaths wrote:

In hour one of the Stormfront podcast of Date: 03-03-15

Truck Roy provides and interesting interpretation of “Love Your Enemy”

He maintains that this is a meant to provide a mindset to overcome the emotional response to sociiopaths, because they are not phased by emotion and concern for the pain and suffering they cause. Therefore, it is best to understand them, even “befriend them” in some dishonest, Jewish way, and then might one know how to defeat them…. or worse,  “befriend them” in the Jewish prescribed “Gentile way” of loving the undifferentiated other so as to convert and assimilate with them.

There are these clever interpretations, “turn the other cheek” to know if the man striking is doing so on calculation rather than emotional impulse, is another. Knowing that it is calculated, one is more free to go ahead and defend oneself.

While there are clever interpretations of Christianity, such as these, there are still too many Jewish bugs and tangles for a normal European population. We, being at one with the undifferentiated gentile other, to be subject to universal panmixia as GW points out, being a central problem.

Moreover, Truck Roy counterposes Christianity to Nietzsche, a false dichotomy.

This comment appeared in entry 'A Request To Dr. Lindtner - To Build The Case Warranting Native European Defense' on 03/04/15, 02:10 AM. (go to entry to post a reply)

Where have they gone? wrote:

For more day to day British stuff, some may have gone to Morgoth’s or Western Spring; those with still more affinity for Hitler, but otherwise fairly grounded despite the slight cultish feel, might like WIN.

Soren fan’s may have gone to his twitter; he may have taken some “NS” people there. As I recall, he said that he felt a close affinity to Captain Chaos’s thinking and to that of Anglin, both of whom are “NS” (politely said). Soren might give some furtive support to Anglin’s site, I don’t know. I have reason to think he might, but don’t believe that he should.

I don’t think JB has totally abandoned us but he is busy with work. Same with Soren.

Soren and JB both might like Red Ice for its Germanic/Noridic bias and sci-fi predilections. Not sure about that, but maybe.

There seems to be some polemic being taken against MR by sites like Red Ice and others who want more strongly to argue the innocence of Nazi Germany - that seems to explain their programming much more than their purported concern for free speech and truth.

The people who like Uncle Adolf will go where people who like Uncle Adolf will go.

A few people who insisted upon Jesus, (or both Jesus and H) have gone to Anglin’s. I guess that you know that, and also know that a few like that, such as DanielJ/ ClassicSparkle/ DanielAntinora may have gone to Tan’s site. Tan doesn’t have many, but takes a few of this kind. Antinora also has his own site listed somewhere in the sidebar (Ironically, he condemns people as “boring” if they don’t believe in Christianity and some kind of traditionalism).

The troll Silver seems to be frequenting Alt Right and maybe Radix. I haven’t looked at Hunter Wallace’s site much, nor for some time, but that got a few at one time.

I don’t know where Leon Haller and Thorn have gone, but couldn’t care less so long as it is not here. Thorn has tried to troll again recently, as has Haller under yet another pseudonym on less frequent occasion. Our current resident troll is JamesUK.

I believe the ones who were loyal to Alex Linder (like Jimmy Marr) have remained loyal. Jimmy had Lurker make a post here at MR called “Poland” and it amounted to Alex Linder reading about how stupid Poland was through a journalists’ reports of Poland during the depression era - during the depression and after Poland had regained its nation for a few years following imperialist occupation for over a century; reports aimed at appealing to Germanic cultures that made anti-Polinism their armchair sport - and the post at MR was called “Poland” as if that summed it all up. So, I changed the content of the post, putting up the story of the Polish cryptographers who first cracked enigma and left the title, “Poland.”

Maybe Linder and Jimmy want to push a Nazi Germany was perfect angle. Jimmy tried to say that I was too sensitive, but in truth, to make a post like that and call it “Poland” (the definitive case) was ridiculous. Had it been labeled differently, I probably would have left it and responded differently.

If they had posted an article addressing the problem of Poles being in Britain, I would have been happy to have that issue raised again, as I believe it needs more addressing. Perhaps we should soon raise the issue again.

Matt Parrott and Bugs people may have directed their swarm away from MR and toward Renegade or Rodney Martin and some of the other pro-Nazi or pro-Jesus, i.e. right wing or “neither right nor left” sites.

Gregor, who used to champion my work at Voice of Reason, may still be frequenting TOO. He once asked me to spread some of the Bugs work. I told him that I couldn’t do it..and what I meant by that is that I couldn’t endorse Tim Murdoch automatically - for two reasons. Though I do respect the large percentage of his effort he spoils it for me by getting into nutty conspiracy stuff. I know that can be popular, but for me it lacks integrity. More importantly, I may be mistaken, but it seems that Murdoch takes a position that “wink”, we smart people know that Uncle Adolf really had it all right, that he didn’t do nothin’ wrong, but the masses, they don’t know that so we got to keep it cool.”

I can’t endorse the “Nazis just have an image problem” theory.

Red Ice, Renegade, Rodney Martin, Anglin and others are trying that angle. More generally, that may be a Regnery thing.

But it is evident that Murdoch has some influence on that - most recently, Angelo John Gage was taking that angle having recently spoken to Murdoch (people just don’t understand Hitler “like we intellectuals do”).

Both Greg Johnson and MacDonald take some of the Hitler friendly people. KM takes both Jesus and Hitler people if they can present themselves in a public face, even hardcore Nazis, like Hadding Scott. I am a little disappointed, but Americans are swimming in a German/Jewish diatribe to an extent that they might not be aware.

There is a liberal type that looks upon Atzmon and Gotfried as ok, because they more or less give a pat on the head to Nazism, there there, its those xenophic Eastern European Jews to watch out for, those Zionists. Fooled or coddled by their conservatism/liberalism, some will endorse them and their kind of neo liberalism - Radix, Richard Spencer, David Duke.

In sum, the Hitler, Jesus and “Jews (and others) are us (provided they talk conservative/liberal/NS) people” have gone where they might.

Perhaps some who might find affinity with us have gone to “White Tribalism”, the blog of John Londen - who claims to be more different in aim from MR than I think he might be, but he wants to distinguish himself. GW remains concerned to tarry with normal political expression and Londen may not see our underlying point for that reason.

Other than these platform issues, there can be a few reasons for people to shy away - Perhaps both GW and I can be too critical for some, but we are accountable and we advocate all Europeans and their discreet kinds.

I do miss “Wandrin”... but he did not only seem to indicate agreement, but also a need to be discreet from his part.

“Wobbly” was good too. Don’t know what happened to him.

James Bowey and Frosty Wooldridge have prepared for another interview of Frosty, but perhaps Frosty has gotten cold feet: I don’t really know what’s up there..

Today we will be talking to Dr. Christian Lindtner.

I’m looking forward to it, others should be too.

This comment appeared in entry 'MR Radio: Greg Johnson talks to GW and Daniel' on 03/04/15, 12:54 AM. (go to entry to post a reply)

jamesUK wrote:

BBC The Great European Disaster Movie, Newsnight Debate-HD

This comment appeared in entry 'MR Radio: Dr Tomislav Sunic returns to talk to GW and DanielS' on 03/03/15, 10:33 PM. (go to entry to post a reply)

Nick D wrote:

The internet is fluid and I’m always slow on the uptake ... Where are Majority Rights readers and commenters c.2005-10 hanging out now?

This comment appeared in entry 'MR Radio: Greg Johnson talks to GW and Daniel' on 03/03/15, 07:22 PM. (go to entry to post a reply)

Churchill's unthinkable plan wrote:

‘Finest Years: Churchill as Warlord 1940-45′ by Max Hastings.

Hastings condemns as folly Churchill’s attempt to promote mass uprisings in occupied Europe, and details ‘Unthinkable’ –his amazing 1945 plan for an Allied offensive against the Russians to liberate Poland

Inasmuch as this is true, it flies in the face of the argument that Churchill had no concern to make good on his stated reason for declaring war in the first place.


This comment appeared in entry 'A Request To Dr. Lindtner - To Build The Case Warranting Native European Defense' on 03/03/15, 04:28 AM. (go to entry to post a reply)

DanielS wrote:

Angelo John Gage returns to Renegade:

He claims that he’s never heard anyone use the term “anti-supremacist.” While that may be true, and again, fine and good with me, Bowery has said the same thing almost exactly, as have I, and many others, in essence.

Next, Gage goes on to claim that in his three years of White activism that he has become so informed that he can refute all arguments by the enemy.

He provides the example that the evolution of DNA existed before humans and therefore race is not a social construct. Again, of course, all he proves is that he does not understand social constuctionism.

He says that you “cannot deny Hitler’s economic miracle.”

But while many aspects of Strasser’s economic miracle may be commendable, Hitler’s betrayal of it, beginning with “the night of the long knives” (perhaps “The Road to Resurgence”, even further back) does fly in the face of Hitler’s credit. And to focus on domestic economic turnaround is a bit like Gage’s next argument, focusing on one aspect of an overall failed regime - saying, “no gas chambers therefore no” etc

At which point a retarded person calls into the show and says that “anybody who oppose(s/d) Hitler is opposed to Whites.” Of course the opposite is true, anyone who advocates Hitler advocates the most obvious conflict and self destruction among Whites. But Hunt and Gage do not rebuke the caller’s position in that manner and go right on talking….

Next, Gage refers to “Hippies being too busy smoking pot at Woodstock” and thereby Gage falls into the right-wing trap of being distracted from Jewish, Jewish feminist programs and into right-wing motives (corporate/military industrial), while blaming White men for pursuing the guiding light of their survival despite a compulsory draft into a war (Viet Nam) irrelevant to their EGI.


The two go on to discuss their belief in natural elites…but with their commitment to Hitler, etc, demonstration is again provided that there is a difference between judgment and logic. Logic is for followers, judgment is for the elite, from which these two show themselves to be far removed.

This comment appeared in entry 'A Request To Dr. Lindtner - To Build The Case Warranting Native European Defense' on 03/03/15, 03:18 AM. (go to entry to post a reply)

ownmost innocence wrote:

I am going to defend Europeans, which includes Germans, obviously, among all our discreet kinds, whether the holocaust is a thousand percent true or false.

Admittedly, it is from my perspective that holocaust denial does not seem necessary and in fact, quite unhelpful as it casts suspicion upon our innocence and otherwise eminently warranted motive to defend ourselves in these generations far removed from the World Wars.

Particularly as the facts stand in the past and nobody alive bears live responsibility for their happening - only perhaps some legacy of survivor’s guilt and speculation that there might be a genetic tendency to repeated behavior under certain circumstances (a suspicion only exacerbated by denial) - it is easier to proceed with defense of Germans and European survival as a genetic whole and national parts if the holocaust is more or less factually true (how those facts “count”, say, as a “religion”, commanding punishment for eternity, is another matter).

But if the facts are more or less true, they beg the question of “why?” such hostility toward Jews? There are only two general answers in response: either the Nazi Germans were ex-nihilo homocidal, determinedly linked to such ideological proclivity, or there was interaction with provocation which created a reaction beyond their normal, every day state.

We all know the experience of being provoked and overreacting. Upon reflection we realize that we might have acted differently, for even if we got revenge to some extent, we hurt and misrepresented ourselves at the same time. We were not in our authentic character where might lay our ownmost innocence.

Under provocation of foreign influence, and not having our full, authentic bearing, we overreacted, overcompensated to throw-off the malign influence, taking us beyond optimal parameters of our authentic range of functional autonomy. Thus, it may be said that our true character was not represented, but there were mitigating circumstances of provocation. Our true character shows in recognition of a different course, a more measured, rational response, which retains the light of our interests while handling provocation in such a way that does not induce us to assimilate the role of the antagonistic and exploitative agency which provoked us.

It is perhaps taking that very measure of authenticity, as in GW’s focus, which is crucial to our understanding. And, I suspect, that The Golden Rule and its universality is a dangerous trick played upon us, through what Bowery describes as the first popularized instantiation of Jewish media hegemony - the Christian texts; wherein, as GW says, we play the role of “undifferentiated gentile masses”, to be mixed away while Jews retain particular identity as the special, chosen people and all that bull.

One measure in correction then, is The Silver Rule of “do not do to them what you would not want done to yourself”, to replace the toxicity and non-discrimination of The Golden Rule’s undifferentiated obsequiousness.

I wouldn’t be the least bit surprised if there were some biological, cybernetic correction on the part of the Nazis as a result of Christianity’s obsequiousness.

Following a cycle of feedback for needed correction, and subsequent over- compensation (viz. WWI), Gregory Bateson had an interesting take on the Nazis, suggesting that they manifested malevolent transformation as a result of having been kicked when they were down in Versailles - this was a betrayal on a meta-communicative level; having surrendered (in WWI) the nature of the relationship was invoked - could we trust your mercy? If kicked when down in surrender, it then became doubly hard to trust, and made “moral puritans” of the victim..we might say, “factual, truther taskmasters”, in the case of the present day deniers unending and fanatical concern for minutia of proof.

The absurd, pure unanimity, professions of complete denial and perfect victimhood by Nazi apologists indicates a manifestation of this puritanism.

Nevertheless, Dr. Margaret MacMillan argues that The Treaty suffered from bad publicity, that it was not quite as unreasonable as popularly taken. That would then lend itself to the claim of “over-perception of having been kicked when down” - but even so, sufficient enough, as perception, to precipitate overreaction.

These expressions, therefore, would call into question the social interaction of the Germans which took them away from their optimal and authentic character.

Now, it may be true that Germans are characteristically top-heavy in logic, and with enough provocation and stress, a few planks of relational judgment might come unhinged. But if something like that is known and honestly taken into account, it might be managed in cooperation with the management of other European populations. And as for their excellent logic, as opposed to V2’s being directed at fellow Europeans, judgment may allow the rockets to be redirected to the stars..

This comment appeared in entry 'A Request To Dr. Lindtner - To Build The Case Warranting Native European Defense' on 03/02/15, 02:05 AM. (go to entry to post a reply)

In the sway of Faurisson wrote:

Munich judges come to their verdict: Sylvia Stolz was sentenced to 1 year and 8 months in prison, without parole! It seems that it can be appealed. In any case, the site of Altermedia Deutschland writes that “the date when her detention might begin is still uncertain.”

In the German newspaper “Bild”, Oliver Grothmann announced the sentencing of Sylvia Stolz with the headline, “The denial disturbed should go to jail,” and at the end of article he wrote : The case “ends well: prison for Holocaust denial!”

We do not have many details except that, as is the case for 70 years, Judge Martin Rieder, 57, ruled that “the Holocaust is common knowledge. There are few historical events that are better documented. Each Holocaust denial is an insult to the victims. “

In a coming podcast with Majority Rights, Dr. Lindtner will touch upon the Stolz case, seeing her as used, similar as Dieudonné, in the dishonest and malign sway of Robert Faurisson.



This comment appeared in entry 'A Request To Dr. Lindtner - To Build The Case Warranting Native European Defense' on 03/02/15, 12:35 AM. (go to entry to post a reply)

jamesUK wrote:

“The Great European Disaster Movie” Official Film TRAILER

Now on BBC iPlayer

This comment appeared in entry 'MR Radio: Dr Tomislav Sunic returns to talk to GW and DanielS' on 03/01/15, 11:54 PM. (go to entry to post a reply)

Camp of the Demons wrote:

Compulsory Diversity News: 1000 Posts Later by Adrean Arlott

Today’s post is my 1,000th since I started this blog in 2006. I would like, if I may, to share with you something I have been kicking around in my mind for quite some time.

Has it ever occurred to you that we may be in Hell together, you and I? Not the deepest part of it ... not yet. But if you wanted to punish a reasonable, White, Western person who loves his/her people, wouldn’t the world today be a good place to send such a person? Certainly, White people have faced much worse calamities - marauding Asiatics from the steppes, slave-raiding Corsairs on the coasts, Islamic invasions of the Balkans and Spain. But always there was an effort to fight back, to drive out the threat and punish the offense.

Now the gates are opened - everywhere - simultaneously. The descendants of our tormentors are replacing us as surely as if their ancestors had defeated our own. What is worse is that the vast majority of our people don’t care. And what is truly horrific is that such a significant number of our people not only welcome it, but facilitate the end of White Western people.

When I read Jean Raspail’s The Camp of the Saints, I was both appalled and stunned. Certainly some of the characterizations were too absurd (which I found appalling), but the fundamental truth was there (which stunned me). The West, and the White race by extension, will die by a combination of its good intentions and its lack of will to defend its existence. All the violations and infamies that follow will be the price of weakness.

But why? Do you ever ask yourself why it has to be this way? Don’t go for a mechanical answer and pin this on a scapegoat. Don’t dismiss such questioning as defeatism. Consider this spiritually and ask what kind of God permits over two millenia of Western Civilization to end in suicide? My answer would be one who wants people to suffer. But which people? The people who commit suicide end their suffering. The people who don’t care about the suicide will not suffer at all. What is left is those of us who despair when we see our people killing themselves. We are the ones God is punishing, and this is our Hell.

A picture from London, taken in 2010 ...

This comment appeared in entry 'Britain's Camp of The Saints' on 03/01/15, 02:31 AM. (go to entry to post a reply)

Sunic on Capitalist Babelization wrote:

Babel and the Capitalist Babelization

February 27, 2015 — Tom Sunic

Review of Babel Inc.: Multiculturalism, Globalisation, and the New World Order
by Dr. Kerry Bolton
Black House Publishing Ltd, 2013

The tower of Babel is rightly used as a metaphor for contemporary rootless and mongrelized masses stashed together in the towering inferno of end times. As an allegory, however, the process of “babelization” signifies a distorted reality and an inhumane political process in which standard forms of cognition and speech are subject to entirely new denominations, requiring a completely different method of conceptualization. Attempting, therefore, to draw some parallels between George Orwell’s 1984 and Bolton’s Babel Inc., cannot be valid; Orwell’s vision of the static future has become outdated.  Bolton’s Babel Inc. offers, instead, a dynamic description of the process of capitalist entropy in which Babel Inc. and its ruling class continue to grind human beings, including themselves, to dust.

Which are these ruling classes in this Babel Inc.? This is where the author masterfully steps in and rejects the wide-spread right-wing babble about the Babel Inc. being allegedly run by a conspiratorial and homogenous group of wicked people, or some extra-terrestrial golems allegedly bent on ruling the White world. Rather, the Babel Inc., or simply put,  the System, resembles a nameless, albeit grotesque polity that can in no way be reduced to just one single free-lance Orwellian big brother or some big postmenopausal feminist mama. The Babel Inc., as Bolton sees it, is a logical postmodern transposition of the myth of economism and egalitarianism, two doctrines whose genealogy can be traced from well before the period of Enlightenment in Europe.

Twin Brothers: Communism and Capitalism

This does not mean at all that Bolton avoids elucidating the mindset and the self-perception of the main movers and shakers in the Babel Inc. In fact, Bolton’s scholarly credibility can best be spotted through the wealth of bibliographic references which indicate the intellectual depth of this effort. Bolton uses a three- pronged approach: theoretical, historical and descriptive. Such a threefold approach to this heavy subject is a prime necessity if the book is to retain a lasting educational value. Thus we learn in the first half of his book that capitalism, being a prime factor in the construction of the modern Babel Inc. and in the deconstruction of the nation-state, has always been a “modern and revolutionary” force. Its inherent dynamics aims at destroying traditional communities, regardless of their spot on the planet Earth. In fact, the much decried and alleged foe of capitalism (or rather its mirror- image), communism, fell apart in the East, in the late 20th century, because its paleo-communistic goals of egalitarianism and economism had already been better achieved in the capitalist West. Both communism and capitalism share a common ideological thread, namely a common belief in progress and common hatred of all racial, ethnic and territorial identities. The Banker and the Merchant, just like their mirror-image the Commissar, detect in any historical rootedness, in any national or racial consciousness a major hindrance on the way to the glorious future under the banner of “free market, democracy and human rights”.

On the daily political front, however, or better yet within the historical context of the development of the Babel Inc., Bolton does not spare the names of organizations and individuals promoting the borderless and globalist Babel Inc. project; knowledge of these forces can help the uninitiated reader dispel the myth of a “freedom- loving West” and its main transmission belt the United States of America. In fact, as Werner Sombart, the German sociologist of the early 20th century noted, “Holy Economy” (“heilige Wirtschaftlichkeit”) is a far more powerful revolutionary process than any anarchistic get together or a communist rabble-rousing pamphlet.

The author starts with his home turf with an examination of the early Australian working class, which under the banner of the Labor Party, as early as the 19th century, was bit by bit defrauded by the bankers and speculators who were all too eager to open Australia to Asian migrants and thus drive down the wages of white local workers.  The loudest advocates, and later on the beneficiaries of the process of the so-called decolonisation in Asia and Africa, were not just Marxist professors in Western academe, or Soviet Cold War apparatchiks, but primarily international big businessmen, “as old empires had become too restive to capitalism.” The author well illustrates this point by looking at the tragic fate of South Africa and Rhodesia, once upon a time White-ruled countries which used to be the bread basket of Africa, only to turn into violence-torn African basket cases with no future in sight. The iconic figure of the ANC, the Black activist Nelson Mandela, still hailed by starry-eyed globalists as the canonized Black Saint, once upon a time was determined to kick capitalism out of South Africa, only to declare in 1996, that is to say, after South Africa had already turned into an ungovernable entity, that “privatisation is the fundamental policy of the African Nation Congress and will remain so.”

The American government, The Trilateral Commission, along with many self-proclaimed humanitarian NGOs, such as the famed George Soros’ Open Society Institute, behind their mask of lacrimal multiculturalism and behind their culinary diplomacy, have been the main motors in turning Asia and Africa into a giant pool of cheap labor and permanent political unrest. This is the true goal of Babel Incorporated.  Hence the first conclusion one can draw after completing reading the first half of the book, and just before one starts railing and ranting against colored immigrants flooding now Europe and the USA: Massive non-White immigration, and now its reverse side, i.e. the colonisation of Europe and the USA, is just a logical outcome of political designs framed long time ago by rootless plutocrats and their leftist acolytes.

Bolton does not forget to look at the importance of “culture wars” and notes how global plutocrats use those wars in an attempt to subvert recalcitrant governments all over the word. Contrary to false presumptions, still strongly held by many right-wing intellectuals, the “uncultured” USA plutocrats have been very slick in fostering the multicultural “American dream” by resorting beforehand to the creation of a myriad of “independent” cultural outlets and think tanks in the target countries. One could enumerate a dozen post-communist countries in Eastern Europe which, in the mid- 90’s and early 2000’s, were all subjected to the Babel Inc.-inspired “velvet” and “rainbow” revolutions, as well as the so- called “Arab spring revolutions.” In an attempt to destroy a sense of national and racial pride and in an effort to impose a hybrid mishmash of new consumer species — i.e., homo consumens — the Babel Inc. decision makers do not need to send F14s to the Serbian skies or over the Iraqi desert, but instead resort first to Hollywood imagery and hip-hop political acrobatics in order to enchant the youth of the target country. The costs are negligible; the benefits are great.

The author rightly sees that before Whites start bewailing the destructive consequences of forced multiculturalism and its inevitable corollary of non-White immigration flooding their countries, they must critically re-examine the now redundant notion of their own nation-state. It is fundamentally wrong to blame all our ills on the SPLC, or the ADL, or the LICRA, or the Trilateral Commission, or some real or hypothetical Jew, or some hostile, plutocratic, culture-destroying Babel Inc. elites only.  We White Europeans and Americans must accept our full share of the blame. We must first and foremost reject the religion of progress and its underlying principle of permanent economic growth, before considering setting up our own ethnic enclaves. Whether these ethnic enclaves are in the Northwest of the U.S., or in Orania in South Africa, or somewhere in Europe, they must keep capitalism on a short leash aimed at preserving the racial/ethnic integrity of these enclaves, as occurred under the White Australia policy and the 1924 immigration restriction law in the U.S. Given the still strong and age-old squabbles among and amidst European peoples, this nearly impossible task can only be bestowed upon dispassionate White individuals capable of transcending their own narrow tribal interests — and their own egos.

Dr. Tom Sunic ( is a writer and a board member of the American Freedom Party.

This comment appeared in entry 'MR Radio: Dr Tomislav Sunic returns to talk to GW and DanielS' on 02/28/15, 11:04 PM. (go to entry to post a reply)

M wrote:

I’m interested to hear about a spiritual marriage nowhere in the holy scriptures does it say him whosoever believeth in the Lord that is my wife and him whosoever puts his faith in the Lord strengthening steadfastness the same I will call husband. Let’s Talk about making a new earth not the lie of this crisis I’ll fill you in on a little secret of how I found out this was a lie take the capital G under some circumstances it may turn out to look like a German Swastika continue on to write a self employment business logo sign to generate money for example. Got Water or Got Solar have been used leave room at the bottom of your Got for your phone number and if you don’t have one leave a blank spot then write F as it is written in Gray’s Anatomy with the A and E combined. Instead of Fake ID. It’s F ID. The ID may look like TOP .The P may look like A Question mark.

This comment appeared in entry 'Abortion: the hidden holocaust' on 02/28/15, 04:07 PM. (go to entry to post a reply)

No son of mine wrote:

From Genesis’ “We Can’t Dance”:

No son of mine

Jesus he knows me

Driving the last spike

Tell me why



This comment appeared in entry 'MR Radio: Dr Tomislav Sunic returns to talk to GW and DanielS' on 02/28/15, 01:50 PM. (go to entry to post a reply)

Murros fan wrote:

Interesting comment from TOO:

  February 26, 2015 - 11:27 pm | Permalink

  While the news is “less bad” than we have been led to believe, we still face the fundamental problem…We do not rule our own country. We have no government of our own and there is ZERO prospect of electing one as we no longer live in a representational democracy.

  Existing law already makes this endless wave of immigration “illegal” and mandates that the US federal government not only secure the border to stem the flow, but also requires the government to expel those who are already here illegally.

  What would be the point of further legislation if there is no mechanism to ensure that the laws are faithfully executed by the government? The US government no longer recognizes the constitution, or any law for that matter, as constraints upon its actions and policies.

  The most vigorous response by the federal government to the illegal immigration problem as been to crack down on efforts by state and local governments to protect themselves from the flood of illegals. The message coming out of Washington is perfectly clear…they are letting it be known by all that they wish to facilitate the flow of non-white immigrants into this nation regardless of what the law or American citizens might have to say on the subject.

  There is no shortage of Americans speaking out against illegal immigration, but their voices are drowned out by the constant stream of propaganda coming out of Washington and the Jewish controlled mass media. We constantly hear about the “immigration problem”, but not in the context that most Americans understand it…we hear only about the desperate need to make “illegals” legal, to provide documentation to those who are here illegally and how to change the immigration system to make it easier for these people to come here.

  Given all of that, what pray tell does the author imagine we are going to do about this problem? Increasing our own fertility rates at a time when people cannot afford to raise large families will do nothing to stave off the coming disaster. All this will do is increase the rate at which middle class American families are slipping into poverty…and make our people even more dependent upon “uncle sugar”.

  The author correctly concludes that the battle is not lost, but that we must stop the flow of non-white immigrants into the country. The real question is how? It seems obvious to me that we have ZERO chance to alter the demographic agenda of the hostile elite that rules in Washington.

  I’m not trying to be negative here, but I think we all need to understand what real political power is, and is not. Within the political system ran by these hostile elites, our votes give us very little power and absolutely no power to actually effect real change that adversely impacts the interests of these elites.

  But we are not powerless. The real power of any people lays in their latent ability to take to the streets; in their ability to cease cooperating with the elites; in their ability to bring economic activity to a standstill through job actions, picket lines, and other forms of “direct action” (some of it legal, much of it not). In its purest form, it lays in our ability to form angry mobs which can drag these elites out of their comfy offices and hang them from lamp posts!

  If we are serious about defending our interests and regaining control of our own futures, then we must at the very outset dismiss this notion that we must be “non-violent”, that we must act only in accordance with the rules imposed upon us by our adversaries and the most ridiculous of all, that we must “work within the system”.

  Our salvation will not be found within the system as it exists. We must expose the system to our compatriots for what it is…and convince them that they really have nothing to lose by joining us in opposition to this system. Everything they think they have to lose (money, jobs, property, etc.) are either already lost or were never real in the first place. What we do have to lose is our families, our way of live, our culture and the freedom we have promised to our children.

  Simply educating our brethren is not enough. We must educate ourselves about how to organize our movement, and it is going to take a movement, in such a way that we can be successful. To that end I encourage everyone to read Kai Murros writings on the subject and then think about how his ideas can be applied to our own situation.

  I think that once you do this you will begin to see what must be done and how to get there. What we need is not charismatic leaders to show us the way…what we need is a movement with a structure and purpose that will produce real leaders from the ranks of our people who can do extraordinary things when history calls upon them.

  I am not speaking of revolutions in the 19th century sense of the term with rebel armies battling it out in combat with government forces. I am talking about creating a movement that will supplant the existing power structure by making it irrelevant in the lives of ordinary people.

  Where the government no longer serves the interests of the people, our movement must be there to step in to see to their needs. When the government no longer protects the people, we must be there to protect them. When the economic system no longer meets the needs of the people, we must be there to provide an alternative that does.

  At the end of the day, it is about our people and we will win them over by serving them better. We will not impose ideology upon the people, we will listen to them and advance programs and actions which support our culture and improve their lives. We will defend our culture by example. We will be the alternative that these hostile elites have denied our people for far too long.

  If we are successful, there will come a day when the current elites have become irrelevant and their power will be shown to be as illusory as the banknotes they pass off as “money”. We will not defeat them with bullets, rather we will simply become more relevant to the lives of our people than the government controlled by these hostile elites. There is a point at which these hostile elites will no longer be seen as having any legitimacy and at that point they will have lost their grip over the people.

  Time is short my friends. While we must continue educating our brethren, we must also get serious about the work of educating those of us already awake to the danger about how to organize ourselves in a way that will make our movement effective and resilient. There has never been a successful revolutionary movement in all of history that did not have a coherent purpose and effective organizing principles. I can assure you that this will not be the first. My own view is that Mr. Murros has provided us with an excellent basis from which to begin, but perhaps there are better ideas out there. If so please let’s bring them to the fore…if not, then for God’s sake, let’s get down to business.

  I assume that there are those of us out there who are already moving in this direction, or at least I hope that is the case. With the guidance provided in Mr. Murros work, each and every one of us can have everything we need to get started organizing. It is most important that we have an organization that comes from the ground up…rather than from the top down. Top down organizations simply cannot succeed in this endeavor as they are far too easy to co-opt and/or destroy. Thousands of local organizations of cadres are far more resilient and for our purposes, desirable.

  So let’s no longer sit around and complain that we don’t know how to begin or what to do. No more whining that we are powerless. If you have a better idea, then go for it. If you are still struggling to figure out what to do or how you can help, then simply apply what Mr. Murros has provided in your own life. There is no more time to dither. Good luck Brothers.

Murros video - this is war:

This comment appeared in entry 'Kai Murros on the European Revolution!' on 02/28/15, 01:52 AM. (go to entry to post a reply)

"Narrative" wrote:

In this reading of Revilo Oliver (which is, of course, good):

..during this reading, Alex Linder makes the furtive remark that anyone who uses the word “narrative” is against the objective truth and trying to deceive people.

That is Not true.

Narrative is a corrective means of working hypotheses for putting the facts together in their coherent patterns in a broader sense than might otherwise hold together in concept, but rather be susceptible to manipulation for having too arbitrary, myopic a focus on empirical objects divorced from social responsibility.

It is one of the advantages of hermeneutic process.

And this represents a positive difference of The White Left. Whereas the Right tries to focus warrant on singular objective and anti-social facts, the White Left looks at the broad patterns of White social interest, which include more or less objective facts, but not to the exclusion of the relative interests of the broad European social pattern, its parts, its “social capital” and accountability. 

That is to say, narrative is one way of talking (with focus on sequential feature) that can reconcile particular facts by collating them with broader patterns not practically available for empirical inspection in a moment.

It is, of course, a means by which we can conceptualize the speculative organization of ourselves, as a group/groups, and of course, as such, why the Jews have made the hermeneutic concept of narrative didactic.

This comment appeared in entry 'A conversation with Alex Linder' on 02/27/15, 04:38 AM. (go to entry to post a reply)

DanielS wrote:

GW makes a subtle, interesting and good point about peoples who’ve come through communism acquiring a (bad) habit of being overly critical of “big thinking.”

Tom makes an equally excellent point of their “economic miracle” being dependent upon international corporations which do not necessarily allow for a living wage, such that ordinary people have got to emigrate to make a living and find upward mobility.

This comment appeared in entry 'MR Radio: Dr Tomislav Sunic returns to talk to GW and DanielS' on 02/27/15, 02:35 AM. (go to entry to post a reply)

AW wrote:

Well let begin , first off to the Latino people. It is white people that allow you to come to america, to take away black men and women jobs, second wake up black people , these Latinos hate you and want to be in your place lol , they hate that. Black culture is loved worldwide and they copy black culture from the music , to the fashion , to the slang words on the streets , no one black is playing mexican music in thier homes , lol mexicans did not do anything during America civil war period. Mexicans did not stand with black men and women and children during the early 1920’s when blacks were fighting for equal rights in America , with white people , next thier no mexicans fighting in the Supreme Court with thurgood Marshall for black kids to have equal education and to go to School with white kids , and thier were no mexicans in the march on Selma or the civil rights movement of the 50’s and 60’s that changed america forever , but now mexicans enjoy all of the victory’s of the black man and women fight against white America’s laws and injustice’s , lol

This comment appeared in entry 'Mexicans versus Blacks.' on 02/27/15, 02:27 AM. (go to entry to post a reply)

jamesUK wrote:

Proof? So called European nationalists use this Jewish boogeyman as something to focus on as a diversion problem between nationalist sentiment between countries themselves like WW1, WW2, War on Terror, etc. 

Screwed that comment up meant to say:

Proof? So called European nationalists use this Jewish boogeyman as something to focus on as a diversion rather than the problem of opposing nationalist sentiment between countries themselves like pre-WW1 European conflicts,WW1 and WW2 and current issue of unified economic, trade and law agreements of the European Union.

This comment appeared in entry 'MR Radio: Dr Tomislav Sunic returns to talk to GW and DanielS' on 02/26/15, 09:45 PM. (go to entry to post a reply)

jamesUK wrote:

JamesUK, the Ukrainian conflict is funded by, and serves the interests of, Jews/Israel and to some extent, their proxies, viz., corporations and The US govt/military industrial complex


Proof? So called European nationalists use this Jewish boogeyman as something to focus on as a diversion problem between nationalist sentiment between countries themselves like WW1, WW2, War on Terror, etc. 

Adolf Hitler’s Final Testament (4/29/45)

More than thirty years have now passed since I in 1914 made my modest contribution as a volunteer in the first world war that was forced upon the Reich.

In these three decades I have been actuated solely by love and loyalty to my people in all my thoughts, acts, and life. They gave me the strength to make the most difficult decisions which have ever confronted mortal man. I have spent my time, my working strength, and my health in these three decades.

It is untrue that I or anyone else in Germany wanted the war in 1939. It was desired and instigated exclusively by those international statesmen who were either of Jewish descent or worked for Jewish interests.

There are western economic and geo strategic interests in Ukraine but Israel/Jewish interests are more focused on Iran and its nuclear program with neighbouring states and Cold war strategists like Zbignew Brzezinski who opposed the post 9/11 foreign policy focus towards Iraq and the Mid East and against US support of Israel and a possible war with Iran wanting a harsher line against Putin in Ukraine.

This comment appeared in entry 'MR Radio: Dr Tomislav Sunic returns to talk to GW and DanielS' on 02/26/15, 09:39 PM. (go to entry to post a reply)

JamesUKtrollwatch wrote:

JamesUK, the Ukrainian conflict is funded by, and serves the interests of, Jews/Israel and to some extent, their proxies, viz., corporations and The US govt/military industrial complex.

The only reason I allow this comment (number 8) is because, again, it is didactic in illustrating the type of disinformation a troll would put across.

This comment appeared in entry 'MR Radio: Dr Tomislav Sunic returns to talk to GW and DanielS' on 02/26/15, 05:12 PM. (go to entry to post a reply)

jamesUK wrote:


I’m surprised my comment didn’t get deleted to. You are the Jihad John of the internet moderators.

No the Ukrainian crisis is not because of Jewish interests as in both Russia and Ukraine Jews support the position of their national governments.

Who is the only country so far to actually pledge weapons to the Ukrainian government to fight Russian backed separatists in Ukraine? The Sunni Arab Muslim state of UAE.

Putin’s puppet was overthrown in Ukraine, a corrupt buffoon so Putin thought he could seize on the opportunity by annexing Ukrainian territory and trying to seize total control and influence in the country by seizing the Eastern regions of Ukraine all for his own vanity and narcissism who has completely fucked up the Russian economy. 

This comment appeared in entry 'MR Radio: Dr Tomislav Sunic returns to talk to GW and DanielS' on 02/26/15, 03:51 PM. (go to entry to post a reply)

DanielS wrote:

“Sunic is right as if the Balkans war was not proof enough of the fallacy of a unified European national identity the current crisis in Ukraine is the death nail to the idea just like the myth of pan-Arab nationalism.”

First of all, Sunic doesn’t say that Europeans cannot cooperate, only that has been difficult, particularly as seen from his perspective of Croatian - Serbian relations.

The Ukrainian crisis is not the deathknell that you wish.

It is precisely Jewish interests that stirred this conflict with Russia in order to punish Russia for their backing of Iran and Syria. In addition, these same interests want the fertile land of Ukraine for themselves and the half Ukrainian bastards of the sex trade - the fathers being Jewish they cannot become Israeli.

It is your wish and goal to stir-up conflict between Europeans, “that this crisis is the deathknell of any such cooperation.”

The only reason that I do not remove your comment is for its didactic effect. One can see the wishes and designs in your comments.

This comment appeared in entry 'MR Radio: Dr Tomislav Sunic returns to talk to GW and DanielS' on 02/26/15, 02:06 AM. (go to entry to post a reply)

jamesUK wrote:

Sunic is right as if the Balkans war was not proof enough of the fallacy of a unified European national identity the current crisis in Ukraine is the death nail to the idea just like the myth of pan-Arab nationalism.

This comment appeared in entry 'MR Radio: Dr Tomislav Sunic returns to talk to GW and DanielS' on 02/26/15, 01:20 AM. (go to entry to post a reply)

Guestlurker wrote:

This map well illustrates the mere three towns of any size that were granted to Poland by Versailles and that Nazi Germany might have wished to dispute: Posen, Bromberg, Thorn and one town, Danzig, made neutral.

Of the four, Bromberg and Thorn were Nazi Germany’s most legitimate outright complaint, but were given to Poland for logistical contiguity and other reasons.

Posen was the Pole’s ancient capital; they fought to re-take it in the Wlkp Uprising.

Danzig had changed demographics and had been disputed historically, from Germanic, to Polish and Neutral. The Versailles committee made it neutral again.

To Hitler and the deleted commenter’s mind, this constituted a good reason for annihilating major cities up to the Urals (including Moscow, Petersburg, Kiev, Minsk and Warsaw), displacing the Slavic populations with Germans (while calling me a “Polak” because I don’t think that is a great idea), saying that pandering to a particular disgruntled and uninformed niche of Germanic and Irish audience of The US which might not be averse to hearing such egregious bullocks presented as “truth”, and the number of hits that that pandering brings to a site, is being “successful.”

That’s not to mention the number of European deaths Hitler’s gambit cost.

Unfortunately, the population of Nazi Germany supported Hitler’s gambit to take over up to the Urals. They thought they’d get away with it, gambled and lost.

Its too bad for them that they could not have been satisfied with regaining the Sudetenland and resolving issues, over the 3 cities granted to Poland and the neutralization of Danzig, in another way.

But you are talking about Hitler and his massive military build up for obvious aggressive purposes, which had already moved beyond the Sudetenland once granted it; proving his intentions for aggrandizement - so, what reasonable negotiations could there be? None, of course. Hitler’s disposition and intentions were well known as were those of the commentator.

This comment appeared in entry 'MR Radio: Dr Tomislav Sunic returns to talk to GW and DanielS' on 02/25/15, 02:59 PM. (go to entry to post a reply)

Ms Disraeli wrote:

Victorian Romance Meets ‘House Of Cards’ In ‘Mr. And Mrs. Disraeli’
February 23, 2015 - book review Maureen Corrigan

A climb “to the top of a greasy pole” are the immortal words coined by 19th century British Prime Minister Benjamin Disraeli to describe his rise to political power. Disraeli was two-time prime minister under Queen Victoria, as well as a novelist and famous wit whose way with a catchy phrase was rivaled in the 19th century only by his younger admirer, Oscar Wilde. But when he entered politics in the 1830s, Disraeli was burdened by debt and, even more seriously, by his Jewish parentage. Anti-Semitism was a constant throughout Disraeli’s life; the Irish leader Daniel O’Connell, for instance, once attacked him in a newspaper diatribe saying, “Disraeli’s name shows that he is of Jewish origin ... [and] He has just the qualities of the impenitent thief on the Cross.”

If Disraeli’s climb to the top of that “greasy pole” was especially difficult, he largely owed his success to his gentile wife, Mary Anne, who boosted him up with her charisma and her fortune every slippery inch of the way.

After husband No. 1 died, leaving Mary Anne a 47-year-old wealthy widow, she married Disraeli, then a debt-ridden dandy of 35.

This comment appeared in entry 'The founder of modern conservatism was a Jew' on 02/25/15, 01:16 PM. (go to entry to post a reply)

colored policewoman shoots White mom wrote:

White mom shot by colored policewoman:

Mother shot dead by police after she called them for help getting rid of unwanted guests

Betty Sexton was shot in the chest on Tuesday in Gastonia, North Carolina Officers had been responding to reports of a domestic disturbance.  Ms Sexton was reportedly holding a musket at the time of the shooting

LaDoniqua Neely, the police officer who allegedly shot the 43-year-old, has been put on administrative leave while an investigation is carried out. 

Second time in two weeks Gastonia police have fatally shot somebody

Read more:

This comment appeared in entry 'Officer Wilson Interview' on 02/25/15, 12:42 PM. (go to entry to post a reply)

black x draws blood-heart wrote:

...heart drawn with her blood by black X

This comment appeared in entry 'WHITE WOMEN FOR SALE!' on 02/25/15, 12:36 PM. (go to entry to post a reply)

Page 1 of 3492 pages  1 2 3 >  Last ›