Comments posted

Page 1 of 3475 pages  1 2 3 >  Last ›

John wrote:

Most of these internet movements function in the same way as an evangelical pastor with their small congregations; and so the key aspects are ‘deification of subject matter’ and ‘donations’. 

To think that any of them are really intent on parsing truth or reaching a ‘mainstream’ level is laughable. Why?
i. Because if these ‘movements’ did grow sufficiently enough, then people like Andre Anglin or Yeager would quickly find themselves at the back of the bus.
ii. Their supporters actually go there for the self-fetishistic/self-deifying/antagonistic—not to hear some kind of criticism of their quasi religion.

p.s. even Red-Ice is now drinking the Hitlerian kook-aid claiming that peaceful Germanic tribes were colonized and forced-converted by other Europeans for thousands of years. Is this because they picked up a history book and discovered these ‘facts’ or is to appeal to their ‘audience’ and ‘contributors’?

This comment appeared in entry 'MR Radio: Jan the White Uniter of United White' on 11/24/14, 07:29 AM. (go to entry to post a reply)

send media complaints to: wrote:

America, Canada and Western Countries: Becoming the World’s Refugee Camps

By Frosty Wooldridge

Part 10:  Actions you can take to change America’s history to a positive one

If you read and understand this series as to what it means to your country, your state, your community, your schools, and your children—concerning the addition of 100,000,000 (million) immigrants within the next 30 years—wouldn’t you want to do something to change the course of human events?  Wouldn’t you like to take action to stop the importation of 100 million more people from 140 countries around the world? 

Wouldn’t you like to leave your community, your schools, your city and state with at least a chance to survive the 21st century as an intact, viable, culturally stable and environmentally sustainable future?

We Americans pulled together after Pearl Harbor.  We pulled together to win WWII.  We pulled together after Hurricane Katrina.  We pulled together after 9/11.  Each of us sensed enough of our responsibilities individually and collectively to change the course of history toward a better tomorrow for our kids and our country.

I am willing to bet my life that this “legal and illegal” immigration invasion of our country supersedes any terrible “main event” in our country’s history.  If we fail to stop Congress from importing 100 million “refugee” immigrants from 140 countries within 30 years—we won’t survive the 21st century as an intact, culturally viable, and linguistically cohesive country. We won’t survive as to quality of life and standard of living as well as an environmentally sustainable civilization.

Additionally, I realize that less than 25 percent of Americans take any kind of pro-action to better their schools, communities or states.  The other three-quarters of Americans sit, watch, wait and let things happen.  They condemn their children to a pretty miserable and sobering future.  Therefore, I am appealing to you top 25 percent who speak up, write up and take action.

Actions for you to take:

Write 60 Minutes producers and directors:  email: .(JavaScript must be enabled to view this email address)

Ask them to produce a special report on the final results of the addition of 138 million people to the United States by 2050.  Ask them interview top population and environmental experts.  Since the USA enjoys 1.97 birth rate per American female, ask them to deal with what’s causing our population explosion:  legal and illegal immigration.  Demand they give the American people a glimpse into the future if we continue on our current path.  Expect them to interview those of us who may give viable solutions: like reducing mass immigration to less than 100,000 annually.

Snail mail address:

60 Minutes Producers

C/O CBS NEWS

524 W. 57th St.

New York, NY 10019

Write Charlie Rose of CBS and PBS with the same ideas

Charlie Rose   Email .(JavaScript must be enabled to view this email address)

Charlie Rose

C/O PBS

731 W. Lexington Ave.

New York, NY 10022

Write National Public Radio journalists—Leanne Hanson, Terry Gross, Steve Inskeep, Robert Siegel and your favorites to address our projected addition of 138 million more people to the USA within 36 years.

Robert Siegel of NPR .(JavaScript must be enabled to view this email address)

Address:

National Public Radio

635 Massachusetts Ave, NW

Washington, DC 20001-3753

Write Matt Lauer of the Today Show

Matt Lauer, NBC Today Show

30 Rockefeller Plaza

New York, NY 10112

George Stephanopoulos at GMA

7 W. 66th Street

New York, NY 10023

CNN

Wolf Blitzer

One CNN Center

Box 105366

Atlanta, GA 30303-5366

Megyn Kelley

Fox News Channel

121 Ave. of the Americas

New York, NY

Brian Williams email:  .(JavaScript must be enabled to view this email address)

David Muir at ABC News

Bob Shieffer at CBS Face the Nation

David Gregory at NBC Meet the Press

Laura Ingraham Show

Bill O’Reilly Show

Oprah Winfrey

Michael Savage

Diane Sawyer

Jim Bohanan

Peter Boyles

Write Time Magazine with publisher Rick Stengel and encourage him if not demand that his staff writes a series of articles on America’s future with the overwhelming numbers of 138 million more people within 36 years to reach 438 million.

U.S. News and World Report

1050 Thomas Jefferson St.

Washington DC 20007

The Washington Post

1150 15St NW

Washington, DC 20071

The New York Times

229 W. 43rd St.

New York, NY 10036

USA Today

7950 Jones Branch Drive

McLean, VA 22108

Bill Moyers

Story suggestions

450 W. 33rd St.

New York, NY 10001-2605

2020 ABC

Story suggestions editor

147 Columbus Ave.

New York, NY 10023

This Week

1717 Desales St. NW

Washington DC 20036

Anderson Cooper

One Time Warner Center

New York, NY 10019

Shepard Smith

C/O Fox News

Story suggestions

1211 Avenue of Americas

New York, NY 10026

Imagine when all these outlets receive letters, phone calls and emails by the tens of thousands and even into the hundreds of thousands to report on what our country faces.  Please understand that all great movements start at the ground level of the citizens of a country.  That’s how our individual rights began with the Magna Carta.  The “Bill of Rights.”  That’s how we signed the U.S. Constitution to give every man, woman and child the right of “Life, Liberty and the Pursuit of Happiness.”

Ultimately, as a civilization, we do not need, nor do we want, nor can we sustain another 100 million immigrants from all over the world. We cannot endure or survive incompatible cultures, worldviews or barbaric religions.  We cannot and will not survive the sheer numbers involved.  Let’s help them in their own countries to help themselves.

This is your watch. Take it seriously.  Take your responsibilities as a parent as to what kind of country you bequeath to your children.

Let’s get busy.

This comment appeared in entry 'Letter To Brezhnev' on 11/23/14, 08:00 PM. (go to entry to post a reply)

WorstOfJeffersonAirplane wrote:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Cw-6-stIFJc&list=PL8a8cutYP7foz1sBZB6YXzjx1_-NbSKuN

This comment appeared in entry 'From baroque to rock – Part 2' on 11/23/14, 04:52 PM. (go to entry to post a reply)

Alfonso wrote:

Io, il padrino, farà bella ora perché avete rispetto.

Due anni fa, eri brutto.

This comment appeared in entry 'From baroque to rock – Part 2' on 11/23/14, 10:57 AM. (go to entry to post a reply)

FrostyPrognosis wrote:

America and Western Countries: Becoming the World’s Refugee Camps—Diseases

By Frosty Wooldridge


http://newswithviews.com/Wooldridge/frosty994.htm


Diseases being imported into America

As of 2014, 41.3 million foreign-born immigrants migrated to America.  Legal immigrants enter the United States at 100,000 every 30 days.  They form the first wave of an armada of 100 million legal immigrants descending on America within the next 30 years. (Sources: US Census Bureau; PEW Research Center, US Population Projections by Fogel/Martin.)

They arrive from over 115 third world countries where tuberculosis (TB) kills 2.1 million people annually.

Immigrants arrive from countries where leprosy thrives:  official figures show the global registered prevalence of leprosy at 189,018 at the end of 2012 and during the same year, 232,857 new cases were reported.  Leprosy stems from living in filthy conditions without personal hygiene.

In the past 50 years, a total of 900 cases of leprosy affected the American population. Today because of massive immigration from third world countries, 7,000 Americans suffer with leprosy.

‘‘And those are the ones we know about,” said Dr. John Levis, physician at Bellevue Hospital’s Hansen’s Disease Clinic in New York. “There are probably many, many more and they are spreading.”

Most of those infected in the United States originate from global leprosy hot spots: Mexico, Brazil, India and the Caribbean. But, in the past 16 years, Levis and his colleagues proved that a few of his patients — including a 73-year-old man from Queens who had never been out of the country and an elderly Jewish man from Westchester County, New York — contracted leprosy in the United States. Leprosy’s symptoms—bumpy rashes, skin indentations and loss of feeling in hands and feet.  As a result, the disease is now officially endemic to the Northeastern United States for the first time ever.  (Source: NY Times, Sharon Lerner, 2/20/03, ‘Leprosy on the rise in the US’)


Immigrants arrive with the Chagas parasite from South America where it affects 16 to 18 million people and kills 50,000 annually.  It attacks the heart and other internal organs.  It cannot be cured. (Source: Kiss of Death by Joseph Bastien)


Those immigrants arrive with Enterovirus.  This year, 55,000 children from Central and South America crashed America’s borders without health inspections of any kind. They dispersed throughout the United States into school systems and foster care that now feature American children suffering from paralysis.

Additionally, they arrived with tapeworms, head lice, TB, skin rashes and other diseases.

Immigrants arrive in America carrying Ebola virus, which killed over 4,033 people in West Africa in 2014 and now threatens to move into America’s mainstream population.

Immigrants arrive with AIDS from Africa via illegal immigration.  AIDS killed over 25 million people in Africa since 1981.

Washington, D.C. is one of the areas hardest hit by HIV in the

United States, with an epidemic on par with some developing nations.  “In D.C., approximately 2.7% of the population is living with HIV, which exceeds UNAIDS’ definition of a “generalized” epidemic (having HIV prevalence greater than 1% of the population).  D.C. features the highest AIDS diagnosis rate of any state in the U.S.  The epidemic is driven by a complex interplay of factors and the impact of HIV/ADS varies across the District of Columbia.”  (Source: Kaiser Family Foundation)

West Nile virus entered the United States over 10 years ago.  It killed 1,100 Americans.

Malaria causes 2.7 million deaths annually worldwide:


·  Malaria was eliminated from the United States in the early 1950’s.

·  Approximately 1,500–2,000 cases of malaria are reported every year in the United States, almost all in recent travelers. Reported malaria cases reached a 40-year high of 1,925 in 2011.

·  First- and second-generation immigrants from malaria-endemic countries returning to their “home” countries to visit friends and relatives tend not to use appropriate malaria prevention measures and thus are more likely to become infected with malaria. (Source: CDC, Atlanta, GA)

Another bug riding in the bodies of newcomers to America:

tuberculosis. In an article from ‘THE PATIENT PREDATOR’, Mother Jones News, March issue:  Dr. Reichman of New Jersey TB Clinic, “In the 1990s, cases among foreign born Americans rose from 29 percent to 41.6 percent.  Anti biotic resistant strains from Mexico have migrated to Texas.  Since three years ago, 16,000 new cases of TB were discovered in the United States. Half were foreign born. Strains of TB once found only in Mexico have migrated to border states of Texas, Arizona, New Mexico and California.  It migrates north as illegal aliens work in restaurants as cooks, dishwashers and food handlers.  We sit on the edge of a potential catastrophe.”

American citizens and their children face more diseases. Hepatitis A,B and C run rampant in fast food workers.  These diseases kill. 

To name a few diseases imported by immigrants in the past 10 years:

Argentine hemorrhagic fever brought into California and Arizona from Latin America via illegal aliens; Exotic New Castle Disease that killed 1.5 million chickens in California and brought in by illegals who use roosters for cock-fighting; Leichmaniasis from the Middle East which is a parasite injected into the blood by sand-flies, malaria from Bantus from Africa, polio from Nigerians coming into the USA, 16,000 cases in three years of MDR mycobacterium tuberculosis which is incurable, brought directly from Mexico.


This website offers thousands of cases and dozens of other diseases brought in by legal and illegal immigrants.  Go to:  ‘IMMIGRANTS AND PUBLIC HEALTH: WHY IMMIGRATION IS A HEALTH CARE CONCERN’, http://www.fairus.org/html/0414971.htm

Or, you can go to ‘PUBLIC HEALTH PUT AT RISK, http://www.limitstogrowth.org/web-text/public-health.html

American citizens either vote representatives into Congress to repeal the 1965 Immigration Reform Act that injects 1.2 million legal immigrants into the USA annually, or, face accelerating disease rates.  Additionally, the current S744 amnesty bill doubles legal immigration to 2.0 million annually, thus, doubling the rate of speed of third world immigrants from 140 countries racing into America.  Once within the USA, they become our problem.

 

This comment appeared in entry 'Ebola remiss an alarm for border control as even most objective standards of human ecology ignored' on 11/23/14, 02:47 AM. (go to entry to post a reply)

The Talent wrote:

Anthony introduces “The Talent”, a new currency

The logo of the Gelre, the first unit based on the Talent. Soon we will launch a national unit for the Netherlands)

Introducing The Talent
by Anthony Migchels on November 19, 2014

Alternative currencies are a crucial component in addressing our monetary problems. However, the monetary architectures that are currently available are wholly insufficient to provide serious relief for Main Street. The Talent is the first independent currency model that provides all functions that modern currencies need to truly compete within the Dollar/Euro paradigm. Not only that: it is now available for immediate implementation at ultra low cost.

Interest slavery and the ongoing gutting of the West through the credit crunch continue to erode living standards everywhere. Small and Medium business is suffocating for lack of credit and demand in the economy, while Big Business is reporting record profits and claiming larger and larger shares of the market.

High class units, operated professionally by people who know what they are doing, have every opportunity to provide small and medium business with both the liquidity they need to operate and new customers. Alternative currencies are not only a great customer loyalty program, as people can spend the units only with the businesses who accept them, they also have the potential to seriously alleviate the liquidity problems of the business’s customers.

In hard times, alternative currencies tend to boom. During the Great Depression literally hundreds of them were operated in the United States. In Spain and Greece, hit hard by the Euro Crisis, have seen dozens of units spring up. Argentina has been surviving because of them since its 1998/2002 collapse.

Most famous is the Swiss WIR, which has been turning over billions since its inception in 1934. It’s famed for its stabilizing effect during recessions, when capital scarcity makes it more worth while for business to deal with its limitations.

Limitations of Alternative Currencies
However, the Alternative Currency market remains handicapped by major problems. Amateurism and lacking monetary architects of the units being the main ones. The currencies that manage to thrive are typically run by energetic people. The WIR shows how far even very primitive currencies can go if run by a professional organization.

This shows both in the superficial analysis of both the real nitty gritty of the monetary problems that we face and the political context. The field is dominated by idealists. Over the last few years a marked improvement in terms of political awareness is definitely palpable: say five years ago most in the alternative currency business were oblivious to that bankers behind it all, for instance. Nowadays this is no longer the case, everybody is used to ‘conspiracy’. But this creates a new problem: the disconnect between the awareness on the web and the stone age conversation that is still the norm in the mainstream.

At the moment the discussion about the monetary architectures that are available is mounting and that is indeed very important, but still much remains to be desired.

Entrepreneurial ambition is really key to make it all work, but this must be combined with level headed appreciation of the monetary and this combination has shown to be very elusive indeed.

The Key Challenge for Modern Currencies
There are two major architectures that hold sway: Euro/Dollar backed units and Mutual Credit based units. Most units work with the basic agreement that 1 Unit = 1 Euro/Dollar, meaning they use the Euro or Dollar as unit of account.

The Euro/Dollar backed units, for instance the American Berkshares, the German Chiemgauer or the British Brixton Pound, are created by selling units: A Berkshare is sold for $1. The Dollar is held by the issuing organization, the Berkshare is spent into circulation at a local business. The local business can spend the unit with a colleague or pay an employee. If at some point a business acquires more Berkshares than it can spend in the network, they can reclaim a Dollar for every unit with the issuing organization.

The great boon of this system is that it allows convertibility of the unit. However, the great downside is that there can never be more Berkshares in circulation than the issuer has Dollars at hand. This means that there can be no interest-free credit. Money scarcity remains a real issue, as the money supply is dependent on scarce Dollar.

Mutual Credit based systems create money as credit: participants, businesses in particular, can just get a credit line in the unit and start spending. The minute they do, new money comes into circulation. When a debtor repays, money is taken out of circulation.

The great upside of this system is that there is no money scarcity: people will typically experience an abundance of money and a shortage of places where they could spend the units. The exact opposite of the Dollar/Euro situation, where most have less money than they would need to invest. There is interest-free credit.

But this comes with a price: there is no Dollar/Euro in the bank to back the unit or to convert. And this is a real problem, because there will always be businesses, usually the more succesful ones, providing popular goods or services, who obtain too many of the units, more than they can usefully spend in the network and they will have to limit there intake, creating serious bottlenecks in trade.

The Talent
The Talent answers these challenges by providing the first fully convertible Mutual Credit based unit in the world. By providing an online exchange where people can buy and sell the unit. See here for a full breakdown of the system: http://realcurrencies.wordpress.com/2012/01/10/mutual-credit-for-the-21st-century-convertibility/

The Talent is a complete set of software and best practices, that is now available to everyone who wants to start his own currency. It can be implemented at very low cost and provides the start up with everything he needs to operate a truly comprehensive currency backed with high class methodology, incorporating the lessons learned with 80 years of experience with these units worldwide.

Implementation of the Talent comes with full consultancy for the starting initiative by the system’s developer, the writer of these lines.

The Talent’s proposition is particularly ideal for entrepreneurial people who know what is at stake, who see the clear business opportunity that creating high class, professionally run units provide for both participants and the initiator himself.

By implementing the Talent, the entrepreneur can focus on building the network and the organization necessary to run it, resting assured he’s offering his participants the best complementary currency currently available anywhere.

The Talent is the first unit in the world that provides everything we expect from money:
- It is sufficiently available (‘abundant money’)
- It provides interest-free credit
- It is convertible to Euro/Dollar
- Allows payment on-line and by mobile phone
- Connects both businesses and consumers and potentially (local Government)
- Implementation comes with full consultancy.

All in all the Talent is the first architecture that truly allows head on competition with Dollar or Euro in the marketplace.

The Time is NOW
Years of research and development have been invested in the Talent. It answers all the major issues facing those in the field today. The first unit based on the Talent is the Gelre, which is in pilot phase and for which we are currently raising funds for wider marketing. Soon a national variant for the Netherlands will be launched.

Implementation is seriously considered in the United States, Britain and Ireland.

Funding remains a huge issue. It’s sad: not so much money is required, but while there are Trillions available for saving banks, it’s very hard to get even a few thousand to save us from the banks.

However, we will soon launch a major crowd funding initiative, where you will have a hands on chance to make a difference in the struggle against the Banks and their Usury and deflation and for normal people looking for a reasonable deal!

Concepts of the Gelre, or: What is ‘High Powered Working Capital’?
Mutual Credit for the 21st century: Convertibility

 

This comment appeared in entry 'MR Radio: Migchels, Bowery Address Malign Economics' on 11/22/14, 06:19 AM. (go to entry to post a reply)

FrostyDemography wrote:

The Titanic and the United States

Much like the Titanic that sank on April 15, 1912, the United States stands at a critical juncture in the history of our nation. Few realize it, but, like the Titanic, this nation smashed into a piece of legislation in 1965 that was never asked for or approved by the American public.

                                                    - Frosty Woolridge


http://www.frostywooldridge.com/

 

This comment appeared in entry 'Apollo&Dionysus: Were Hippies Protesting the Moon Landing, Ayn?' on 11/22/14, 04:31 AM. (go to entry to post a reply)

Deal wrote:

# 6 “Mark2”

It’s a deal. Let’s take it further. You can take all the blacks in Europe back to Africa and we would take all the Whites in Africa back into Europe.

We’re not hiding either.


“Posted by Mark2 on November 20, 2014

https://www.facebook.com/mark.siajunza

At least Jan or David Duke don’t hide behind a computer screen.

Robert Mugabe, the great son of Africa, is for Black Rights and does not hide behind a computer.

Let us debate in the light not shadows.

Maybe we can do a deal. Like you give us your Blacks and we give you back our Whites in Zimbabwe and South Africa.

You see we can come to some understanding. 5 million whites for 1 million blacks in Britain.

I am not hiding.”

This comment appeared in entry 'MR Radio: Jan the White Uniter of United White' on 11/22/14, 04:15 AM. (go to entry to post a reply)

CompulsoryDiversityNews wrote:

From Compulsory Diversity News:

Friday, November 21, 2014, Adrean Arlott

Suffer, you Mudshark Mama!

Just a couple of days ago I brought you the story of Amy Strickland, entitled: Every Tweeterer’s Worst Nightmare. Strickland, an Assistant Principal at Booker T. Washington High School in Norfolk, VA, was targeted by sub-ape students and the NAACP for retweeting a joke picture showing mixed-raced teens at prom. The tagline beneath a pic of seven mixed-race couples was “Every white girl’s father’s worst nightmare Or Nah?” Those offended by the tweet decried it as racist.

And my response at the time:

It is possible that Amy Strickland is a closet White Whateverist who disapproves of race mixing - but I sincerely doubt it. In fact, I can only entertain the possibility as a hypothetical for the sake of making a larger point that later excludes that possibility. How do we know she doesn’t approve of race-mixing, or think it is cool, or do it herself, or otherwise get “turned on” by it? We don’t.

Well, now we know she does approve, because of Strickland’s apology today:

“The “tweet” appeared to me at the time to have been an attempt at good natured humor concerning mixed race couples attending a high school prom,” Strickland wrote. “Because I have two daughters who in fact did attend proms with African American dates, I casually forwarded the “tweet” last June to one of those daughters.”

Did you catch that? Strickland’s two daughters went to the prom with Negroes - so she thinks that gives her a pass! But ... prepare to initiate harm joy ... harm joy initiated ... it don’t! The easily offended are still calling upon school administrator’s to make Strickland suffer: Transfer her, punish her, do something to let us know it has not gone unnoticed,” said student Shakira Harris.

GOOD! Let the hate flow through you!


           

Amy Strickland, “The Mudshark Mama’, allowed both her daughters to take n**ger-dates to the prom, and all she got for her tolerance was to be smeared as a racist by the national media. You got what you deserved - n**ger-lovers’ mother!”

This comment appeared in entry 'WHITE WOMEN FOR SALE!' on 11/22/14, 03:38 AM. (go to entry to post a reply)

ImperialCulture wrote:

Neil Kramer: Imperial Culture vs..

http://www.redicecreations.com/radio/2014/11/RIR-141121.php

This tool of imperial culture becoming more prominent in the 80’ and 90’s

My awareness of this tool of culture and race and ethnicity and sexuality and all these seemingly natural things..our different races our different cultures the way we express ourselves emotionally and sexually…things appear natural on the outside…in the 1990s in Britain, there was enormous shift in how things were dealt with…particularly with race..and to do with prohibitions and prescriptive language…...and I noticed that on the television, BBC 2 and Channel 4 and these particular kinds of programs…and it seemed to be very heavily biased so, that got me to thinking about the relation between culture and what I call empire.

I think that leads us to a clear view of race as well..the relation between culture, empire and race is kind of important…and I would say that the mainstream culture that we have in the west in particular, which represents the dominant paradigm…the culture which we see through our screens and Apple and Google and Facebook and pop music and blockbuster movies and jobs in factories and offices…all of that culture is imperial culture and it has very little to do with the native reflection of real human beings to me and I would say that it is not arisen organically from men and women of the land.

It is not the result of their natural creativity and visions and impulses.. the majority of that conventional culture we see before us..particularly today on computers and of course going back a little more on our televisions and newspapers is wholly of empire.

And it is very carefully engineered to fabricate a dependence on technology and a relinquishment of personal freedom and social control. A nice benchmark for me to think about this is that real human cultures are slow to develop..

Gradual, strong, they are rooted in a spiritually resonant morality and a great relationship with the land without exception. Whereas imperial cultures are the opposite.

And it seeks to keep a large number of people under control by keeping them ignorant and functioning on a low common denominator..

 


To that point Neil Kramer does well. After that, the imperial culture thesis misses some points that we might hope to be developed and elaborates the speculative, as I listen on, even wildly speculative and counter-productive psycho-babble and mere spirituality.

But the imperial culture idea is a good way to look at things and distinguish between authentic native vs what is imposed and affected.


Immigration of entirely foreign people, the imposition of them as “native nationals”, all aspects of PC can indeed, be usefully looked-upon as imperialist culture - Jewish and corporate/plutocratic…. ..Mulatto supremacist…Darwinist/liberal.


...........

Things appear natural on the outside..

On the relation of culture, empire and race. The mainstream culture that we have in the West ...is imperial culture and it has very little to with the native reflection of real human beings and it is not arisen of organic relation to the land..

And our genetically closely related groups, we would hope he might add.

“Whereas Neil Kramer says that people either respond to imperial culture by liberalism and egalitarian or separatist and nationalistic

and either is ok with the imperialists”

Oh really Neil?

Fail.

Excellent premisary thesis - Imperial Culture.

Failure in development of the thesis.

 

This comment appeared in entry 'Paying attention to the place of community as well.' on 11/22/14, 01:49 AM. (go to entry to post a reply)

voznich wrote:

To Lister:

You’re Scottish, right? Are you SNP or UKIP? I assume you wouldn’t like Tories or Labour, the first for neoliberalism, the second for its multiculturalism. But is there even a UKIP presence in Scotland? And aren’t UKIP free market liberals minus the pro-EU and pro-immigration? Is BNP gone? What about Paul Weston’s party?

This comment appeared in entry 'MR Radio: Jan the White Uniter of United White' on 11/22/14, 01:31 AM. (go to entry to post a reply)

ImmigrationFiat wrote:

Fiat executive power plus forced integration =


“Everything You Need To Know About Obama’s Executive Amnesty”

http://townhall.com/tipsheet/conncarroll/2014/11/21/everything-you-need-to-know-about-obamas-executive-amnesty-n1922199

In a primetime address on November 20, President Obama made his sales pitch to the American people for a series of immigration executive actions he will sign on November 21 in Las Vegas, Nevada. Here is what you need to know:

What actions is Obama taking specifically?

The key to Obama’s new immigration policy is the creation of one new amnesty program and the expansion of another.

Specifically, Obama’s new amnesty program will give illegal immigrants who have been in the United States for at least five years, and who are parents of U.S. citizens or legal residents, a three year work permit. This permit will also allow them to obtain a Social Security number and get a driver’s license. Pew estimates that 3.5 million current illegal immigrants will qualify for this program.

Obama is also expanding the existing Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals amnesty program. Previously only those illegal immigrants who were born before 1981 and entered the U.S. as a minor before 2007 were eligible for benefits. Now all illegal immigrants who entered the U.S. as a minor before 2010 will be eligible for amnesty. Like the parents above, DACA recipients will also get work permits, Social Security numbers, and driver’s licenses. Pew estimates that 235,00 illegal immigrants will gain eligibility for benefits through this program expansion.

Is this legal?

Obama didn’t think so. As recently as this spring, and on more than 20 other occasions, Obama said he could not rewrite immigration law by executive action.

Specifically, this March Obama told Univision, “But what I’ve said in the past remains true, which is until Congress passes a new law, then I am constrained in terms of what I am able to do. ... t at a certain point the reason that these deportations are taking place is, Congress said, ‘you have to enforce these laws.’ They fund the hiring of officials at the department that’s charged with enforcing. And I cannot ignore those laws any more than I could ignore, you know, any of the other laws that are on the books.

More damning, in 2011, Obama told the National Council of La Raza, “Believe me, the idea of doing things on my own is very tempting. I promise you. Not just on immigration reform. But that’s not how our system works. That’s not how our democracy functions. That’s not how our Constitution is written.”

How is Obama justifying this amnesty?

The Office of Legal Counsel memo released before Obama’s speech cites Obama’s Article II Section 3 constitutional duty to “take care that the Laws be faithfully executed” as the source of his power to grant this amnesty.

The memo reasons that since there are 11.3 million illegal immigrants in the country today, and DHS only has the resources to remove 400,000 illegal immigrants every year, Obama must choose which immigrants to deport and which to ignore. This “prosecutorial discretion” power, the memo claims, allows Obama to choose which illegal immigrants get work permits, which illegal immigrants will continue to be ignored, and which illegal immigrants will be deported.

But Congress can afford…

 

This comment appeared in entry 'Forced Integration of remaining White flight neighborhoods by Obama Administration' on 11/22/14, 12:23 AM. (go to entry to post a reply)

AustraliaCalling wrote:

Jews, Multiculturalism, and the War on Free Speech: A TOO Case File

November 20, 2014

Andrew Joyce

One of the most important functions that TOO has played in recent years has been to catalogue Jewish efforts to promote multiculturalism and muzzle with extremely repressive legal measures any speech critical of multiculturalism and the Jewish role in relentlessly pushing it. At the beginning of this year, Brenton Sanderson offered stunning further insight into the Jewish war on White Australia, remarking that “in addition to opening the floodgates to mass non-White immigration, a key part of this Jewish campaign to radically reengineer Australian society in their own interests has been to shut down speech critical of this immigration and multiculturalism — and particularly of the role of Jews in foisting these disastrous policies on a resentful White Australian population.”

Sanderson indicated the primary methods by which organized Jewry developed and employed their influence on both fronts, for example, through the formation of “think-tanks” and the dissemination of “reports,” which were then carried into government. The influence of unelected Jews in this process is not only breath-taking in scope, but also exposes the fiction that we live in democratic societies.

Read full article at TOO:

http://www.theoccidentalobserver.net/2014/11/jews-multiculturalism-and-the-war-on-free-speech-a-too-case-file/

This comment appeared in entry 'Pay attention' on 11/21/14, 12:26 PM. (go to entry to post a reply)

That'sHow wrote:

By espousing the rejection of those projects which are divisive of European coordination, and marginalized anyway for good reason, normal, reasonable European peoples will feel more free to participate.

This comment appeared in entry 'MR Radio: Jan the White Uniter of United White' on 11/21/14, 10:35 AM. (go to entry to post a reply)

Eikos wrote:

How exactly is this guy who writes off several different WN strains as crazy or immoral (ugh) going to bring about White unity?

This comment appeared in entry 'MR Radio: Jan the White Uniter of United White' on 11/21/14, 09:54 AM. (go to entry to post a reply)

Don'tSteal wrote:

A Russian/Ukrainian lady friend commented after watching this film that she did not like the part where Teresa steals the wallet from the guy she’s dancing with.


Good point. Foreign, sleazy, trying to “buy a dance”, whatever the supposed excuse, it was wrong. OK, it’s a “movie” but these things can be influential. It was a worthwhile comment from Lara.

This comment appeared in entry 'Letter To Brezhnev' on 11/21/14, 04:36 AM. (go to entry to post a reply)

Obamnesty wrote:

Can We Stop Pretending Yet?

The Obama Amnesty

Gregory Hood


http://www.counter-currents.com/2014/11/can-we-stop-pretending-yet/

Can we stop pretending yet? Can we please just stop with this sick farce of Constitutions, and Dreams, and Exceptionalisms and all the rest of it?

It’s over. It’s done. The Experiment failed.

At this point, what is the point of all this?

Barack Obama just abolished immigration law by granting amnesty to an estimated five million illegal immigrants. All of the children of these illegal immigrants will be citizens. He did this unilaterally and illegally. We know it was illegal because he told us so on multiple occasions over the last few years.

If the rule of law, the principle of sovereignty, and even the distinction between foreigner and citizen is to be abolished, why do we have this government to begin with? It seems incredible that this massive apparatus commanding vast intelligence agencies, terrifying military and paramilitary forces, and nightmarish weapons capable of destroying the world ten times over is simply giving up…

....

Yet there’s something deeper underneath all this. Contra the predictions of imminent collapse, the federal government is now reporting record tax revenues and the our expanding federal deficit means little as long as the dollar is secure as the world’s reserve currency. Some believe that other powers are rising to counter American influence, particularly Russia. Yet the entire Russian stock market is worth less than Apple (as are Singapore and Italy.) And the United States has overtaken Saudi Arabia and is now the biggest oil producer in the world. Put simply, the pax Americana continues and Bismarck is proven correct – “There is a special providence for drunkards, fools, and the United States of America.”

The terrible truth is that the decision to essentially hand over the country to a foreign population is being done from a position of strength. The ruling powers of the country have made the conscious decision that they can tighten their control by electing a new people. The new Third World “American” population will be willing to accept lower living standards and the transfer or resources from labor to capital.

Read full article at Counter Currents
http://www.counter-currents.com/2014/11/can-we-stop-pretending-yet/

This comment appeared in entry 'Forced Integration of remaining White flight neighborhoods by Obama Administration' on 11/21/14, 04:28 AM. (go to entry to post a reply)

Graham_Lister wrote:

Nice talk and an echo much of my thought on the ethical and political basis of ethno-communitarianism: its key axis of variation is difference & differential differentation within a nested hierarchy, not silly cod-Nietzschean crap about ‘supermen’ and ‘undermen’ etc. MR should not be allowed to employ or commission debates with people who deal in such asinine drivel (F folks & Hitler loving wankstains).

Even if my life (and the life of my community) is by some mysterious non-political criterion deemed ‘objectively’ inferior etc., it would stil be valued by me simply by the fact that it’s my individual life and our collective life!

To echo the Scottish novelist James Kelman, ultimately our politics is concerned with survival. For whatever value our culture and people has it is ours, and like Sorely MacLean once said about the Gaelic language, even if it was a poor thing, it would still be loved, and those who used it would still have the desire to see it flourish.

Or in even simper terms one loves one’s children more than anything else in the world no matter how ‘objectively’ better or superior the next door neighbours kids are.

And yes suicide (individually or collectively) has no place in any form of ethics or politics.

On other matters folks outside of the UK might like to look at this:

http://www.theguardian.com/politics/2014/nov/20/emily-thornberry-resigns-rochester-tweet-labour-shadow-cabinet

The likes of Thornberry don’t look down on people like the white van man with the St George’s flags on their homes primarily because they are (or might be) on a low income.

It’s about the core majority of Labour MPs who in the Fabian liberal tradition sneer at working-class people’s values, with their genuine concerns about immigration and about dramatic cultural and ethnic change in their neighbourhoods.

It’s about Labour MPs, earning a very nice living from their parasitical sinecure on the back of the native working-class, by having successfully colonised and now totally transformed a party originally founded to meet the political needs of working-class Britons. Labour MPs who, from their lofty upper middle-class professional bubble, dismiss those very people as “bigots” and “racists” and view their sentiments as illegitimate, wrong and inherently ludicrous. The uncouth outpouring of troglodytes etc.

The fact that likely as not the white van man may be trousering £40-£50K a year as a plumber or an electrician is neither here nor there. It’s that he is proud to be English and actually wishes the world to know it that so mystifies the modern liberal Labour elite like Thornberry.

Thornberry knows the square root of fuck all about w/class struggle, politics, history etc., and cares even less.

Labour has contempt for Mr & Mrs Average, we, in all parts of the UK, are now reciprocating that contempt via the SNP, UKIP etc.

Political death to these dismal neoliberal ‘globalists’, whatever their ‘act’ is: the red one or blue one or yellow one. No more Red Tories. Or Yellow Tories, or indeed the Blue version.

Another world is possible; there IS an alternative.

This comment appeared in entry 'MR Radio: Jan the White Uniter of United White' on 11/20/14, 08:58 PM. (go to entry to post a reply)

Mark2 wrote:

At least Jan or David Duke don’t hide behind a computer screen.

Robert Mugabe, the great son of Africa, is for Black Rights and does not hide behind a computer.

Let us debate in the light not shadows.

Maybe we can do a deal. Like you give us your Blacks and we give you back our Whites in Zimbabwe and South Africa.

You see we can come to some understanding. 5 million whites for 1 million blacks in Britain.

I am not hiding.

This comment appeared in entry 'MR Radio: Jan the White Uniter of United White' on 11/20/14, 03:55 PM. (go to entry to post a reply)

teamwork wrote:

Jan has a long history in the struggle, a reasonable understanding of the basic problems facing European peoples, has left behind some cranks and read-into some serious thinkers on the issues. The relevance of speaking to him is not about quanta of knowledge in particular, but of his concern -  always problematic but particularly important to get right as we set out fundamental premises at this juncture: rather than being at odds with one another as Europeans we need better coordination with each other - to have European peoples working toward the same ends. Ethnostates are a project that most should be able to live with.  Not only is Jan reasonable enough to pursue those ends but crucially, he is willing to revise or negotiate his thinking where need be in the effort of coordination. He has shown that reasoning ability as a pattern. Its nothing to dismiss as trivia. 

When a guest has a qualitatively sound outlook in seeking the defense of all Europeans and their distinct kinds - not looking to pit one group of Europeans against another - and has enough understanding to present ideas, even if mistaken, it is an opportunity and occasion to shape them into something finer.


Jan did very well. Having at least one or two guests a month on podcasts is healthy. Although we may air some talks by MR people as well.

 

This comment appeared in entry 'MR Radio: Jan the White Uniter of United White' on 11/20/14, 12:58 PM. (go to entry to post a reply)

Eikos wrote:

Sorry but that was painful. I hope you don’t feel like you need guests on to justify making more shows. There’d be nothing wrong with just you MR guys having discussions on a regular basis (like they do on Right Stuff). Really, I don’t see the value of having guests on at all unless they have an equal or superior understanding of the situation.

This comment appeared in entry 'MR Radio: Jan the White Uniter of United White' on 11/20/14, 11:40 AM. (go to entry to post a reply)

DanielS wrote:

The inspiration part is not hard once the motivation and incentive is provided for participation though matching the total nation with the leftist classification.

After that its about pubic celebration of the rewards and heroism of the justly underpinned society. Thereby providing additional incentive.

GW, knowing what’s afloat in WN, I was frustrated that the pro Hitler-holes were inadvertently given a handle - they will take and run with anything that they can latch onto.

The Nazi-A hole, BlutundBoden, responded to my comment on Carolyn’s blog, saying that I am “mimicking people”:

BlutundBoden, 19/11/14

DanielS mimics Metzger, WWS and Troy Southgate


The old Nazi Whore Carolyn says:

“carolynThu, 20/11/14
I noticed that myself ...

I’m glad you’re commenting on it.

DanielS is an avid follower of this website (CY.net),

An avid follower? I think not. I check there to see what BS that pro-Hitler assholes are trying to pull.

“as well as others, of course. He uses it to feed his anti-Hitlerism, to get ideas of what to be against.”

No I don’t. I know my position exactly.

You have a nerve calling people dishonest you disgusting old bag.

“But Wolf Wall Street (Bob from D.C.) said a couple of months back that he had two Slavic friends: Alex the Serbian and DanielS the Pole. (Daniel insists he doesn’t consider himself Polish, but everyone else does, so ....)”

How many times do I have to repeat that I am a half Italian half Polish American?


“That makes for a tie-in but Bob also said he had not talked to Daniel for a couple of years! Some friendship. (I have a sneaking suspicion he’ll be talking to him again, if he hasn’t already started - I imagine Daniel has contacted him.) But yes, Daniel definitely is a mimic - he’s still trying to find himself.”

I’m not trying to find myself you old pig.

”(Well, he’s also desperate for something to write about.)”

Nor am I desperate for something to write about. Your site and ones like it only make more garbage that has to be cleaned and shoveled away from normal White/European advocacy. Coming up with ideas is your problem, because you don’t care about reality, you care for your illusions. And that is why when Bob mentioned that there needed to be care for Slav-Germanic relations you absconded the topic to go in the opposite direction, to your nasty ends of smearing entire Slavic peoples (“they do this, they do that, they can’t do this, they don’t have that.” So stupid you are Carolyn). But you will continue to try to create conflict between Europeans.

Carolyn, you will be dead before too long and that is good.  Good riddance you old bag.

BludundBoden will miss you! ha ha ha!

This comment appeared in entry 'MR Radio: Jan the White Uniter of United White' on 11/20/14, 04:22 AM. (go to entry to post a reply)

DanielS wrote:

The editing was quite good, GW. Thank you.

The podcast is a success. Jan says that he will distribute it through a myriad of Facebook contacts.

There were only a few minor content mistakes on my part - e.g., “on their way to Russia” when I meant to say “on their way to Berlin.”

A talk-over where Jan wanted to re-emphasize that Hitler did not just want the territory up to the Urals, but what he thought of, and had in mind for, the Slavs in those lands.

Trying to sneak in a point at the end was also a bit of a mistake - the point I sought to make was about “the team metaphor being where empirical philosophy becomes myopic and unable to take a perspicuous overview of coordinating parts (therefore hermeneutics being necessary for a view of protracted team, systemic coordination);” that was a good point to try to make but maybe not there as it was a both academic for Jan’s tastes and opened a can of worms when we were trying to bring the podcast to an end. So, my ending contribution is a bit enigmatic once again, but this time you were able to end the podcast cordially.

In terms of style, I will correct my stammering as listening back makes me aware and thus able to control it, at least do better in that regard.

Nevertheless, the content is there and significant.

It is a worthwhile podcast. Thank You.

This comment appeared in entry 'MR Radio: Jan the White Uniter of United White' on 11/20/14, 01:11 AM. (go to entry to post a reply)

DanielS wrote:

There was a point in the interview when GW was citing Hitler’s capacity to inspire great enthusiasm..

I don’t know that enthusiasm to that extent is good of itself - and especially not for Hitler of course who, in the end, betrayed the motivating genesis for the participation that became swept up in that sort of enthusiasm.

The motivating genesis of Hitler’s popular support was in appeal to a leftist means, where the whole people are the class - I advocate the same concept in that part: http://majorityrights.com/weblog/comments/leftism_as_a_code_word_part_1_the_white_left

In that manner, with people united, the rank and file is accountable, has less reason to betray, and has motive to remain loyal and participate as they will have their fair necessity and incentive to go beyond duty where they can mage it.

But especially as vigil is maintained toward any potential betrayal of the powerful elite.

Hitler betrayed his elite capacity exactly with imperial and supremacist aspirations while demonstrably betraying the trust, authentic and honest motivation of the rank and file in the night of the long knives.

That’s why the level of enthusiasm for him was dubious - because he went beyond accountability. He had only used the notion of uniting the full group of people as a fully accountable leftist class in order to gain popularity among Germans. It was that holistic notion of the nation as synonymous with the leftist class union, and the popular understanding of that, which provided the authentic motivation.

In his exceptionalism from the class Hitler betrayed that sincerely motivated participation.

 

This comment appeared in entry 'MR Radio: Jan the White Uniter of United White' on 11/19/14, 01:40 PM. (go to entry to post a reply)

voznich wrote:

This post from Derbyshire can never be posted too often. Derb is a bit of a suck-up (who are the “black geniuses” anyway? I really don’t know), who married an Asian, but this is still pretty good. Hard to believe it got him fired from neocon National Review.

The Talk: Nonblack Version

by John Derbyshire
April 05, 2012

There is much talk about “the talk.”

“Sean O’Reilly was 16 when his mother gave him the talk that most black parents give their teenage sons,” Denisa R. Superville of the Hackensack (NJ) Record tells us. Meanwhile, down in Atlanta: “Her sons were 12 and 8 when Marlyn Tillman realized it was time for her to have the talk,” Gracie Bonds Staples writes in the Fort Worth Star-Telegram.

Leonard Greene talks about the talk in the New York Post. Someone bylined as KJ Dell’Antonia talks about the talk in The New York Times. Darryl Owens talks about the talk in the Orlando Sentinel.
Yes, talk about the talk is all over.

There is a talk that nonblack Americans have with their kids, too. My own kids, now 19 and 16, have had it in bits and pieces as subtopics have arisen. If I were to assemble it into a single talk, it would look something like the following.

(1) Among your fellow citizens are forty million who identify as black, and whom I shall refer to as black. The cumbersome (and MLK- noncompliant) term “African-American” seems to be in decline, thank goodness. “Colored” and “Negro” are archaisms. What you must call “the ‘N’ word” is used freely among blacks but is taboo to nonblacks.

(2) American blacks are descended from West African populations, with some white and aboriginal-American admixture. The overall average of non-African admixture is 20-25 percent. The admixture distribution is nonlinear, though: “It seems that around 10 percent of the African American population is more than half European in ancestry.”

(3) Your own ancestry is mixed north-European and northeast- Asian, but blacks will take you to be white.

(4) The default principle in everyday personal encounters is, that as a fellow citizen, with the same rights and obligations as yourself, any individual black is entitled to the same courtesies you would extend to a nonblack citizen. That is basic good manners and good citizenship. In some unusual circumstances, however—e.g., paragraph (10h) below—this default principle should be overridden by considerations of personal safety.

(5) As with any population of such a size, there is great variation among blacks in every human trait (except, obviously, the trait of identifying oneself as black). They come fat, thin, tall, short, dumb, smart, introverted, extroverted, honest, crooked, athletic, sedentary, fastidious, sloppy, amiable, and obnoxious. There are black geniuses and black morons. There are black saints and black psychopaths. In a population of forty million, you will find almost any human type. Only at the far, far extremes of certain traits are there absences. There are, for example, no black Fields Medal winners. While this is civilizationally consequential, it will not likely ever be important to you personally. Most people live and die without ever meeting (or wishing to meet) a Fields Medal winner.

(6) As you go through life, however, you will experience an ever larger number of encounters with black Americans. Assuming your encounters are random—for example, not restricted only to black convicted murderers or to black investment bankers—the Law of Large Numbers will inevitably kick in. You will observe that the means—the averages—of many traits are very different for black and white Americans, as has been confirmed by methodical inquiries in the human sciences.

(7) Of most importance to your personal safety are the very different means for antisocial behavior, which you will see reflected in, for instance, school disciplinary measures, political corruption, and criminal convictions.

(8) These differences are magnified by the hostility many blacks feel toward whites. Thus, while black-on-black behavior is more antisocial in the average than is white-on-white behavior, average black-on-white behavior is a degree more antisocial yet.

(9) A small cohort of blacks—in my experience, around five percent —is ferociously hostile to whites and will go to great lengths to inconvenience or harm us. A much larger cohort of blacks—around half—will go along passively if the five percent take leadership in some event. They will do this out of racial solidarity, the natural willingness of most human beings to be led, and a vague feeling that whites have it coming.

(10) Thus, while always attentive to the particular qualities of individuals, on the many occasions where you have nothing to guide you but knowledge of those mean differences, use statistical common sense:

(10a) Avoid concentrations of blacks not all known to you personally.

(10b) Stay out of heavily black neighborhoods.

(10c) If planning a trip to a beach or amusement park at some date, find out whether it is likely to be swamped with blacks on that date (neglect of that one got me the closest I have ever gotten to death by gunshot).

(10d) Do not attend events likely to draw a lot of blacks.

(10e) If you are at some public event at which the number of blacks suddenly swells, leave as quickly as possible.

(10f) Do not settle in a district or municipality run by black politicians.

(10g) Before voting for a black politician, scrutinize his/her character much more
carefully than you would a white.

(10h) Do not act the Good Samaritan to blacks in apparent distress, e.g., on the highway.

(10i) If accosted by a strange black in the street, smile and say something polite but keep moving.

(11) The mean intelligence of blacks is much lower than for whites. The least intelligent ten percent of whites have IQs below 81; forty percent of blacks have IQs that low. Only one black in six is more intelligent than the average white; five whites out of six are more intelligent than the average black. These differences show in every test of general cognitive ability that anyone, of any race or nationality, has yet been able to devise. They are reflected in countless everyday situations. “Life is an IQ test.”

(12) There is a magnifying effect here, too, caused by affirmative action. In a pure meritocracy there would be very low proportions of blacks in cognitively demanding jobs. Because of affirmative action, the proportions are higher. In government work, they are very high. Thus, in those encounters with strangers that involve cognitive engagement, ceteris paribus the black stranger will be less intelligent than the white. In such encounters, therefore—for example, at a government office—you will, on average, be dealt with more competently by a white than by a black. If that hostility-based magnifying effect (paragraph 8) is also in play, you will be dealt with more politely, too. “The DMV lady“ is a statistical truth, not a myth.

(13) In that pool of forty million, there are nonetheless many intelligent and well-socialized blacks. (I’ll use IWSB as an ad hoc abbreviation.) You should consciously seek opportunities to make friends with IWSBs. In addition to the ordinary pleasures of friendship, you will gain an amulet against potentially career-destroying accusations of prejudice.

(14) Be aware, however, that there is an issue of supply and demand here. Demand comes from organizations and businesses keen to display racial propriety by employing IWSBs, especially in positions at the interface with the general public—corporate sales reps, TV news presenters, press officers for government agencies, etc.—with corresponding depletion in less visible positions. There is also strong private demand from middle- and upper-class whites for personal bonds with IWSBs, for reasons given in the previous paragraph and also (next paragraph) as status markers.

(15) Unfortunately the demand is greater than the supply, so IWSBs are something of a luxury good, like antique furniture or corporate jets: boasted of by upper-class whites and wealthy organizations, coveted by the less prosperous. To be an IWSB in present-day US society is a height of felicity rarely before attained by any group of human beings in history. Try to curb your envy: it will be taken as prejudice (see paragraph 13).

You don’t have to follow my version of the talk point for point; but if you are white or Asian and have kids, you owe it to them to give them some version of the talk. It will save them a lot of time and trouble spent figuring things out for themselves. It may save their lives.

Sad days, but almost all of this seems true.

This comment appeared in entry 'Forced Integration of remaining White flight neighborhoods by Obama Administration' on 11/19/14, 05:47 AM. (go to entry to post a reply)

CDN wrote:


Adrean Arlott:

 

This comment appeared in entry 'Happy Samhain and European Ancestor Worship Day' on 11/18/14, 04:29 PM. (go to entry to post a reply)

Hermes wrote:

Someone said that hermeneutics is epistemology. No, unlike the Cartesian divide of Theoria, which according to Aristotle’s tradition, corresponds with Epistemology and detached the observer in contrast with the real world of practice, hermeneutics is a non-Cartesian method for investigating the world; thus hermeneutics acknowledges that the observer is engaged and in a process involved in interactive, reflexively responding phenomenon, especially when dealing with the social world - which is Praxis - and acknowledges necessary incompleteness and changeableness of observation there as a result of human agency in particular; therefore hermeneutics is not epistemology but a matter of Phronesis - which is practical judgment as Aristotle advised we must use in correspondence with Praxis, the social world. But in dealing in utmost honesty of care, hermeneutics views all investigation as a matter of Praxis at bottom - for what we care (about ourselves, our social involvement and our meas of knowing thereby).

Hermeneutics is not epistemology, but the method of phronesis.

A necessarily engaged and ongoing process of investigation.

Whereas epistemology is a detached way of relating, or rather not relating to the world - which is a problem that Heidegger et al would have seen as set in motion with the pre-Socratics, in teleology and culminating in Descartes.

The third category of Aristotle after Theoria and Praxis, was Poesis - the arts .

Just as Aristotle held that Episteme (the foundation of thinking) corresponded with Theoria whereas Phronesis (practical judgement) corresponded with Praxis, the social world, he maintained that Techne, technology and craftsmanship, corresponded with Poesis, the arts.

A problem that came in with the Cartesian divide is that Techne became separated from Poesis as well. Technology became the means to Theoria as opposed to what Vico might call the topics, the art of judgement or Phronesis. Techne became separated from the arts and from the social world and became “the method” for knowing, the relation of knower to known and for arriving at foundational theoretical knowledge.

This was a central problem Heidegger and his students were addressing - http://majorityrights.com/weblog/comments/hannah_arendt_far_from_innocent - the relation of knower to known and how technology was being abused as the means to Theoria in pursuit of perfect, Cartesian foundational knowledge in detachment from concern of the social world, Praxis.

Thus, how to heal the authentic relation of knower to known that had been ruptured by technology as it become a defacto, celebrity, quasi religious means of all knowing - since epistemology was rejected as an art, the ostensible method of knowing remained only technology.

Heidegger offered a correction to this by observing that thinking was more like Poesis.

Now, in saying that, he is not making a vague statement. He is referring to Aristotle’s three major categories. And he is doing this in criticism of the over application and misapplication of technology as it detached knower from known. That thinking is a more organic, meandering, historically, socially indebted and interactive process than reverence for pure technology might acknowledge. It is more like Poesis. And its comprehensive domain is Phronesis - practical judgment as it concerns the social world.

Can you see how this detachment from social concern and reverence for technology by Western man could contribute to both our achievements and our social demise? And why Heidegger et al was focused on correcting this Enlightenment hubris?

Technology became a mechanical substitute for thinking as a means to Theoria - a Cartesian objective; the method to that pure foundational objective was to be “pure” as well, a method detached and unsullied with the messy social world, its concerns and accountability; this was a wrong turn for Western Man that was set about by teleology.

Hence, Heidegger’s corrective advice that thinking authentically described relates to the world more like Poesis than technology; his further efforts to un-do the Cartesian divide and alienation would look to subsume epistemology into phronesis, of necessity, of concern for our greatest Care which is ourselves, our people, our midtdasein (being amidst our people); and would prescribe that the relation and management of our relation to the world be conducted by hermeneutic process, moving back and forth as judgment saw necessary between narrative comprehensive expanse of the social and historical; and back to empirical verification in weeding-out of the destructively speculative; and back again into the broad view where empiricism is destructive for its detachment, arbitrary myopia, technological denial of social involvement and concern.

Thus, unlike the Cartesian detachment as re-prescribed of Marxist artifice, a concept being applied to the people irrespective of their true nature, proper hermeneutic process would merely draw the line to delimit a social group as a hypothesis, not imposing an illusion, but tending a well founded hypothesis to be verified or, as you might say, to be unconcealed amidst the ongoing back and forth process of hermeneutics. Nevertheless, because hermeneutics is not Cartesian it does not deny the reality of a people’s ontology but provides the authentic means for their authentication.

Note the massive bust of Vico heading this essay
http://majorityrights.com/weblog/comments/yes_the_white_race_is_a_social_construct_contrary_to_jewish_and_right_wing


This essay applies the culmination of Vico’s critique of modernity by his better students
http://majorityrights.com/weblog/comments/the_pejorative_side_of_modernity_or_civilization_competing_theories_or_alli

Part 3 reaches out to Vico at the end
http://majorityrights.com/weblog/comments/the_pejorative_side_of_modernity_or_civilization_competing_theories_or1


On the question of inspiring people to organize as a people, there is a reason why Jews want characterize us as “right wing extremsts” or to say that the left right distinction is phoney. Because this will keep us from organizing. The left is always about unionization of a people, vigilance toward elite betrayal and rank and file scabbery and lack of accountability. This is loyalty and inspiration is ensured by just and fine compensation through proper management resources and social capital.

http://majorityrights.com/weblog/comments/leftism_as_a_code_word_part_1_the_white_left

In terms of what Hitler promoted, at least originally, what legitimately inspired people to unify as a people, was a form of White leftism.

Hitler set-about to betray that already with The Road to Resurgence 1927 (as WWS notes), culminating in the Night of the Long Knives (as TT is careful to point out).

Thus, that one fine aspect of inspiration betrayed was mixed in with the corrupt aspects - such as the Judaic affectations as GW notes, of The Fuher principle, supremacism and millenialism.

 

 

 

This comment appeared in entry 'A hermeneuticist confronts a sortocracer with a provocative issue' on 11/18/14, 12:15 AM. (go to entry to post a reply)

Mick Lately wrote:

If this “Affirmatively Furthering Fair Housing” is carried out and “Immgration Reform” is carried out and further attempts to disarm law-abiding whites through “gun control” are made then perhaps even the most obtuse, in-denial white man will wake up.

This comment appeared in entry 'Forced Integration of remaining White flight neighborhoods by Obama Administration' on 11/17/14, 12:53 PM. (go to entry to post a reply)

DanielS wrote:

Let’s hope so…and there is a widely accepted logic of meaning and action among WN here:

The thinking behind the “worse is better” (for now) suggestion.

I would add the caveat that the casualties will be too significant (interesting philosophical/theoretical questions arise there) to merely accept “worse is better” to do the work…

Nevertheless, things probably do have to get so bad, as the suggestion goes, for the sheeple to awake..

But they will awake if events are stark enough whereas by boiling the frog slowly, genocide by assimilation may be completed without a significant challenge…

The danger in either case is demoralization of White men, in particular…

such that those remaining will be too dispirited to fight or flee to an organized defense; then they will either die-off or also intermarry - with meztizos, mulattoes (who, like Jews, have a kind of crypsis) or orientals.

This comment appeared in entry 'Forced Integration of remaining White flight neighborhoods by Obama Administration' on 11/17/14, 09:01 AM. (go to entry to post a reply)

Guessedworker wrote:

Daniel,

It is not possible for European populations to live with African populations.  The African sociobiology is too challenging.  That’s what “white flight” is all about.  Would not, then, a successful attack on white neighbourhoods inevitably bring to the fore the white American homeland as the surviving option, and also radicalise whites against the very government and nation from which they would have to secede?

This comment appeared in entry 'Forced Integration of remaining White flight neighborhoods by Obama Administration' on 11/17/14, 07:25 AM. (go to entry to post a reply)

KyleC*nt wrote:

http://www.haaretz.com/jewish-world/jewish-world-news/1.626217

Believe it or not, they are stupid enough to take this study at face value:

Tim Bel-murdoch and Kyle Cunt cite this Jewish survey saying that 50 percent of young Poles are viewing pro Hitler sites…

first of all, what is a pro Hitler site?

secondly, what are they looking for there?

lastly, of course, who is behind this study?


I sometimes look at pro Hitler sites, or sites that have pro Hitler sympathies (and am hardly pro Hitler as everyone knows).

But Kyle Cunt and Tim Bel marduk take this so called study at face value and say that its a losing battle to reject Hitler..

That’s indicative of why I don’t trust Horus, besides his forays into bizarre speculation, he treats Hitler as being only problematic as a result of Jewish spin, not that there’s an underlying problem…same position of course, held by Kyle Cunt.

This comment appeared in entry 'Forced Integration of remaining White flight neighborhoods by Obama Administration' on 11/17/14, 01:28 AM. (go to entry to post a reply)

Chris wrote:

“David Duke proposes that we divest concern for all other antagonists to Whites and focus singularly on Jewish power”.

I would deny that he advocates that solely. Just because someone goes down one route does not mean they think that is the only route. I have never heard or read him advocating this be the only route.

Dr Duke’s works have had influence on far more people than any other Pro-White advocate since Rockwell. He tried the US politics route for 20+ years but sadly the forces that Jews put against him were so great that he was not able to advance far.

His current route is good as it exposes Jewish Power to an international audience and introduce are position to them.

This comment appeared in entry 'Are we to be cannon fodder for war on behalf of White plutocrats?' on 11/16/14, 05:01 PM. (go to entry to post a reply)

Same Old Feelin' wrote:

Same Old Feelin’

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=whYbBrqACCM

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=n-JZ1F9dWFo

This comment appeared in entry 'Forced Integration of remaining White flight neighborhoods by Obama Administration' on 11/16/14, 12:42 PM. (go to entry to post a reply)

Thorn wrote:

Deleted: Thorn is a troll

This comment appeared in entry 'Happy Samhain and European Ancestor Worship Day' on 11/14/14, 07:18 PM. (go to entry to post a reply)

TheCosbyShow wrote:

Good essay, Neil.


Meanwhile, on the last Cosby show:


http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2831615/Bill-Cosby-rape-victim-Barbara-Bowman-says-monster-

TV-legend-deserves-scorn-humiliation-got-taunted-internet-evil-deeds-meme-request-backfired.html


EXCLUSIVE: Bill Cosby ‘rape victim’ says ‘monster’ TV legend deserves the ‘scorn and humiliation’ he got after he was taunted online when his meme request backfired

Comic posted invitation on Twitter on Monday inviting fans to create memes using a selection of photos of him

  Stunt backfired after the numerous rape allegations against him
  Not long after, Cosby’s original tweet was deleted and the meme generator was removed from the site
  Bowman tells MailOnline she is grateful that people are taking seriously ‘the truth about Bill Cosby’
  As many as 13 women have claimed Cosby sexually assaulted them in the past, but he has never been charged with rape

Read more: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2831615/Bill-Cosby-rape-victim-Barbara-Bowman-


This comment appeared in entry 'From baroque to rock - Part 1' on 11/14/14, 05:10 PM. (go to entry to post a reply)

Page 1 of 3475 pages  1 2 3 >  Last ›