Comments posted

Page 1 of 3505 pages  1 2 3 >  Last ›

Tanstaafl's paranoia wrote:

Tanstaafl’s paranoia:

Age of Treason Radio
Fear and Loathing and Treason – Part 2

http://age-of-treason.com/category/age-of-treason-radio/

Tan says:

“Monocausalism” (like Johnson’s “monomania”) is just another way of saying craaazy “anti-semitism”. Use your brain and make an argument.”

Wrong, Tan. 

Think about what I am saying: two poles, one Jewish and the other our susceptibility for objectivism (objectivism as opposed to looking after our relative, group interests as we should).

You may not like the term monocuasalism* and it may be used by people who are trying to distract from the J.Q., but there is NO suggestion here that we are crazy and that Jews are not hostile, powerful antagonists requiring acute and priority focus (again, keeping ongoing and most frequent vigil with regard to 7 key niches, while perhaps not giving them ALL attention ALL of the time).

Next, you quote the feeble minded and dishonest Katana to concur where he is totally wrong:

“4 May 2015 at 12:57 pm

  I think your writings are unclear because your thinking is unclear, because your language is unclear, being filled with abstractions and jargon. An example of that…

I concur. And good example.”

Totally wrong.

I am clear in what I think**, and clear enough in how I say it for anyone, but perhaps those, like Katana, who want to believe in Hitler’s perfection (and for people to not hear what people like myself are saying).

Tan, the messiness, the less than perfectly clear causality of the multi-interactive social world must be why you prefer to cite John Friend (with his neat but absurd conspiracy theories to explain all) as a definitive authority.

What you do in focusing on Jews is a good thing, but you are taking it to paranoia when you suggest that someone (e.g. myself) is not using his brain and trying to obfuscate the Jewish role when he looks at our susceptibilities and philosophical corrections thereof.

I can hope for better from you, but if you are endorsing Katana’s BS and John Friend, then perhaps the William Pierce perspective has you held too captive to let go.
 
William Pierce was smart, but we can do better. Indeed, we must.


* Actually, I did not have Tan, or anyone in particular, in mind when chiding “computer nerds” as being susceptible to anti-social explanations, but come to think of it, I believe that Tan is a computer guy. Therefore, he may have an additional proclivity to “monocausality” because, as a computer person, one is involved with technology, looking at transmission circuits for THE place where the circuit is broken. Whereas the social world, of praxis, is multi-interactive, agentive and reflexive (factual terms which he would be inclined to look upon as “jargon” because they do not fit his computer training discipline).

Not that computer training is the only thing playing into monocausality or even that there is anything wrong with focusing on the Jews; but that he is taking too myopoic a perspective and that (computer training) might be one factor.. 


** And I can prove that I am clear in what I think by answering in clarification of any question that you could have for me about what I’ve said.

This comment appeared in entry 'MR Radio: Prof. MacDonald in conversation with GW and DanielS' on 05/06/15, 12:08 AM. (go to entry to post a reply)

Nietzsche's step in liberation toxically reified wrote:

Mike no. 6, thanks for the comment, but you begin by saying that “I am missing the point” and finish by saying that “When one worships the Gods of his enemies, he is already defeated” - which is in essence just part of my point. I did not miss the point, I am making a point which is being missed.

You start by saying:

“You’re missing the point. This is not a question of “power and survival vs morals”. It is a question of “morals vs morals”. This is psychological warfare, laying the groundwork for a shift in public perception and focus, particularly among White people, from respect for invasive Semitic Slave Morality, toward rekindled love for our own traditional European Master Morality.”

You are addressing the public and hoping to instigate awareness that survival and its realization through power is a preeminent concern; that’s fair enough, but with Nietszsche and Truck Roy’s rendered juxtaposition of “moralizing”, the apprehension is inclined to be a false either/or between morals and power. 

It’s convenient to use Nietzsche’s terms because of the well-known and influential treatise on the subject, “On the Genealogy of Morality: A Polemic”.

It is a brilliant and worthwhile read, as all Nietzsche is, but convenient, overly convenient, would be the operative word indeed. I believe GW to be right in suggesting that the Nazis were heavily influenced by a convenient dichotomy between master and slave morality, which was a falsely clear dichotomy and integral to creating the violent, overcompensating hubris of Nazi Germany. More, it would be convenient, overly simplistic and irresponsible pandering to the wish for a largely Germanic America (and others of a background less sympathetic to the Allied cause) to be unburdened of guilt that they should not bear at any rate; but rather taking it beyond, and to an unburdening of guilt into self righteous and a false dichotomy, so as to don a morality which “justifies” the mistreatment of neighbors as “slaves.”

However, Nietzsche was neither the first, nor the last, to discuss these concepts of morality.

Clearly. As I said, there is no avoiding morality, we live within it. That is my point.

To paraphrase: Pathological altruism and subservience are “virtues” of Slave Morality.

OK, I’ll buy that characterization; and Nietzsche’s rendering as such is brilliant; but it must be looked upon as a step in a process, e.g., for those who need to be liberated from Christian morality and the like “slave morality”, otherwise, as reified into a false dichotomy, it becomes toxic, as is Nietzsche’s wont to be.

Pride and strength, (i.e., “power and survival”) are virtues of Master Morality.

Nothing wrong with these valuations, provided their valuation is not taken to hubris (which the Nazis and Hitler did – the proof is in the pudding; despite their apologists blaming everyone else).

The “moralizing”, discussed herein, is adherence to the Slave Morality of the Semitic religions, slave religions, created by and for enslaved peoples, and promoting the “virtues” of, subservience, obedience, and a sense of perpetual indebtedness, (“Original Sin, an infinite and unpayable debt, requires Divine salvation”). Slave Morality is the “We must serve [God and humanity]” world-view, which is entirely destructive

Fair enough, but particularly as the discussion was aimed at public apprehension, “moralizing” as it was used requires this clarification, as not being a freedom from moral concern.

to our own traditional European spirit.

Our traditional European spirit is complex, not only Promethean and Apollonian, Dionysian, it was/is many. But most Europeans would agree that in over-arching famework, that Aristotle was our most characteristic philosopher: he would not reject these virtues, e.g. of pride and strength, and the warding-off slave morality, but would have them optimized so as not to take them to toxicity in naivete or hubris – again, as the Nazis did.

In the world-view of Master Morality, there is no requirement for “Divine Salvation” because there is no concept of “Original Sin”, the infinite debt that makes all men slaves.

Fine, good and perhaps a revelation to Christians, but not so much to those of us (most Europeans) who have left Christianity behind and are trying to flush its self destructive memes from our system (for that, a little Nietzsche now and then, is a helpful reminder).

Rather than existing as “moralized”, humble servants and hapless slaves to our Destiny, the traditional European world-view is one of freedom, strength, self-expression, and self-determination, wherein one’s Fate lies in one’s own hands. Our Gods do not demand that we kneel.

Good stuff and I would object less than GW and Graham probably would – they would see this overly inclined to the propositional self, one of sheerly self created individualism detached from biological and social constraints. I think Greg would agree with that as well, despite his admiration for Nietzsche. This detachment from biological (and I hasten to add, social constraints), this overvaluation of and to an illusionary freedom, that should be posed as a provisional hypothesis at most, has become a toxicity to and from Europeans and European Americans. 

“...the Right is inherently unstable…”

Yes.

Notice that whether it is Christianity, Nietzsche or scientism, “merely objective” factuality, etc, it is wont to go beyond the conceptual and biological constraints of social classifications (racial classifications), their systemic ecology and accountability.

Understandable though it is, particularly in America, it is often a motivation to be free of social indebtedness.

Our struggle for survival is as old as time. An unfortunate paradox exists among White nationalist Christians. Due to the “debt of Divine salvation”, they are unable to free themselves from the Slave Morality of the Semitic religion, therefore, they can never quite fully embrace the European world-view of Master Morality.

You are not seeing my point, perhaps because you, or your audience, have not liberated yourselves from Christianity enough to where you can see social classification (racial groupings) as a median stabilization – a stabilization that will not occur with the conception of this group as master/ those as slaves – another right wing concept, along with Christianity’s quest for purity.

When one worships the Gods of his enemies, he is already defeated.

We agree there (a large part of why I am not a Christian), but one is also defeated when one accepts their terms and the tried and failed epistemological blunders of their Nazi/Jew outlook: the false dichotomy of their master race or the chosen people is much the same catastrophic failure to the best moral outlook, the European outlook (Aristotlean, on balance), its ecological relations and stewarding.

Full liberation from Christian slave morality is achieved through awareness and understanding that it is neither the only, nor the best morality (neither is Nietzsche; neither is liberalism).

.............
On an note of jaw-dropping perversion, Maureen Corrigan’s (NPR) take on Anders Breivik, his “motives” and the character of his victims:

http://www.npr.org/2015/05/05/403303535/one-of-us-examines-the-damaged-inner-terrain-of-norwegian-mass-shooter

Corrigan portrays Brevik’s motives as an unintelligible emanation of “evil.” Yes, she really does that - to her, his motives had nothing to do with genocidal and hideously exploitative imposition of non-native migration onto Norway

Finally, she gushes and glows in “hope” over the pure goodness of the migrants and youth camp liberals.

This comment appeared in entry 'Misguided Truck: "A"moralizing at Stormtrooper Radio' on 05/05/15, 08:32 PM. (go to entry to post a reply)

Mike wrote:

You’re missing the point. This is not a question of “power and survival vs morals”. It is a question of “morals vs morals”. This is psychological warfare,
laying the groundwork for a shift in public perception and focus, particularly among White people, from respect for invasive Semitic Slave Morality,
toward rekindled love for our own traditional European Master Morality.

It’s convenient to use Nietzsche’s terms because of the well-known and influential treatise on the subject, “On the Genealogy of Morality: A Polemic”.
However, Nietzsche was neither the first, nor the last, to discuss these concepts of morality. To paraphrase: Pathological altruism and subservience are
“virtues” of Slave Morality. Pride and strength, (i.e., “power and survival”) are virtues of Master Morality.

The “moralizing”, discussed herein, is adherence to the Slave Morality of the Semitic religions, slave religions, created by and for enslaved peoples,
and promoting the “virtues” of, subservience, obedience, and a sense of perpetual indebtedness, (“Original Sin, an infinite and unpayable debt,
requires Divine salvation”). Slave Morality is the “We must serve [God and humanity]” world-view, which is entirely destructive to our own traditional
European spirit.

In the world-view of Master Morality, there is no requirement for “Divine Salvation” because there is no concept of “Original Sin”, the infinite debt that
makes all men slaves. Rather than existing as “moralized”, humble servants and hapless slaves to our Destiny, the traditional European world-view is
one of freedom, strength, self-expression, and self-determination, wherein one’s Fate lies in one’s own hands. Our Gods do not demand that we kneel.

“...the Right is inherently unstable…”
Our struggle for survival is as old as time. An unfortunate paradox exists among White nationalist Christians. Due to the “debt of Divine salvation”, they
are unable to free themselves from the Slave Morality of the Semitic religion, therefore, they can never quite fully embrace the European world-view of
Master Morality.

When one worships the Gods of his enemies, he is already defeated. ᛟ

This comment appeared in entry 'Misguided Truck: "A"moralizing at Stormtrooper Radio' on 05/05/15, 03:19 PM. (go to entry to post a reply)

London and Warsaw wrote:

BTW,

It is not London and Warsaw,

It is a Poznan and Brighton Axis of Evil.

Now, be a good boy and go play in the street.

This comment appeared in entry 'Misguided Truck: "A"moralizing at Stormtrooper Radio' on 05/05/15, 12:38 AM. (go to entry to post a reply)

As many as it takes to screw you wrote:

As many Polaks as it takes to screw you, Captainchaos.

I can live without the Diabolus of Uncle Adolf alright.

Its a bit harder to live without you, however.

You may find it difficult to believe, but I am actually glad to see you again!

...never meant to chase you away. Sorry for insulting your Uncle Asshole.

This comment appeared in entry 'Misguided Truck: "A"moralizing at Stormtrooper Radio' on 05/05/15, 12:00 AM. (go to entry to post a reply)

Captainchaos wrote:

Right-wingers, such as those over at Stormtrooper radio, simply cannot live without their god, Adolf (where their other Jewish god, the one on the stick, fails them).

And it seems that the London-Warsaw Axis cannot live without a Diabolus in the form of Uncle Adolf to define its moralistic cosmology - er, I’m sorry, “ontology” - in opposition to. 

Just how many Polacks does it take to screw in a light bulb again?

 

 

This comment appeared in entry 'Misguided Truck: "A"moralizing at Stormtrooper Radio' on 05/04/15, 11:52 PM. (go to entry to post a reply)

Pressured for a deal wrote:

“I must advise, and this is the kind of thing that one learns from Metzger, that some of the people who can hurt you most are people who start out being on your side, and then change – whether pressured by authorities as a “deal” for their legal problems or because they just change of their own accord to a more liberal position for personal reasons. So, one must be careful.”

Metzger (on Hendricks show a few years ago) discussing the daunting problem of racial preservation until we come to terms with economic determinism:
http://www.resist.com/Audio_Archive/17A_Hendricks_Show.mp3

This comment appeared in entry 'MR Radio - Tom Metzger, Jimmy Marr, Daniel ... and me' on 05/04/15, 09:18 PM. (go to entry to post a reply)

Death Throes of Military Industrial Congress wrote:

Death Throes of The United States Military Industrial Congress

http://www.resist.com/war_network/radio_station/war_radio_2015/20150328.mp3

This comment appeared in entry 'MajorityRadio: Susan Lindauer talks with Daniel and GW' on 05/04/15, 05:15 PM. (go to entry to post a reply)

Dresden's strategic importance wrote:

Dresden did have strategic military value - it was an important listening post of all frequencies:

...more of what you won’t hear from the American Right:
http://www.resist.com/war_network/radio_station/war_radio_2015/20150327.mp3

This comment appeared in entry 'A Request To Dr. Lindtner - To Build The Case Warranting Native European Defense' on 05/04/15, 05:07 PM. (go to entry to post a reply)

TT's kids wrote:

“To be fair, I do know of one person who is a proper racist and was raised by one: John Metzger. But how common is this? I’d like to know. And he wasn’t really taught that way. Tom told him if he believed anything just because his father did, he wouldn’t respect him.” - Benjamin Garland

Though the picture may seem sarcastic, it isn’t. To be even more fair, not only John, but all of TT’s kids seem to have turned-out very well.

This comment appeared in entry 'MR Radio - Tom Metzger, Jimmy Marr, Daniel ... and me' on 05/04/15, 02:01 PM. (go to entry to post a reply)

NeoCon 5th column wrote:

The Neoconservative Serpent: The Enemy Within the Gates

May 2, 2015

This is a world in which America dominates the world and the Jews dominate America.

An edited abridgement based on this article by Nelson Hultberg, with many clarificatory comments inserted into the text by Lasha Darkmoon.

The term “Fifth Column” came into popular use in the Spanish Civil War in the 1930s. It means a group of guerrillas, activists, and intellectuals who work to undermine a nation from within. Its activities can be out in the open, or they can be secret.

Today, in America, the neoconservative political movement represents a “Fifth Column” for the forces of collectivism or neo-Communism.

Its intellectuals and activists promote themselves as conservatives who oppose the liberals, but their political philosophy has nothing to do with true American conservatism, which has always stood for a limited constitutional government and free enterprise. These traditional American values are anathema to today’s neoconservatives.

The neoconservatives, as we all know, are either overwhelmingly Jewish or shabbos goyim: non-Jewish camp followers of international Jewry who are on the Jewish payroll. They all have one thing in common: a fanatical allegiance to the state of Israel and to the neoliberal values of the Frankfurt School, itself a predominantly Jewish movement that took root in Germany in the 1920s and was then exported wholesale to America.

  The values these neo-Marxists espouse, often disguised and prettified to make them more palatable to the public, are godlessness, a culture of pessimism, despair creation, hatred of Christianity, sexual licence masquerading as “sexual liberation”, the destruction of the family, homosexual propaganda, radical feminism, abortion, the promotion of pornography and sexual deviation, the sexualization of children, and, soon to come, the legalization of pedophilia. 

The late Irving Kristol, editor of The Public Interest, and Norman Podhoretz, editor of Commentary, were the founders of the neoconservative movement in the late 1960s. In their youth during the 1930s and 1940s, they were followers of the communist Leon Trotsky.

Having bought into the Bolshevik Revolution of 1917, they saw socialism as an ideal that needed to be spread to the West. While they and their followers subsequently modified the Marxist roots of their ideology in favor of a more gradualist methodology, they always remained adamant supporters of “collectivism” (i.e. neo-Communism) for America.

Are they outright socialists? No, but their policy proposals have always been in favor of massive government welfarism domestically and an aggressive militaristic foreign policy that seeks what is termed “benevolent global hegemony,” in which the US military is to be used preemptively to spread “freedom and democracy” throughout the world.

  What the neoconservatives want is a centralized mega-state running the world from Washington, with international Jewry calling the shots and doing its utmost to ensure that America, while bossing the world around, remains subservient to Israel and world Jewry. The basic philosophy underlying neoconservatism is essentially this: what is good for the Jews is good for the world.

In Irving Kristol’s eyes, the laissez-faire vision of America’s Founding Fathers was a “doctrinaire fantasy.” Its ideals “make it inadequate for a political community,” he pontificated in 1977.  Yes, Irving Kristol, son of Jewish immigrants to America, knows better than George Washington and Thomas Jefferson what is good for America. The Founding Fathers were fools. Away with their anachronistic views! According to Kristol and his fellow neoconservatives, all such erroneous ideas must be phased out of our collective consciousness.

  And so here is another fundamental premise of neoconservatism: Jews know best what is good for non-Jews. And what is good for non-Jews, as you might expect, is good for Jews also.

Kristol died in 2009, but his worldview dominates all of today’s younger neoconservatives. He believed that capitalism and individual rights are dangerous institutions. They must be constantly modified by a powerful state that redistributes wealth whenever necessary to mold market enterprises into an appropriately egalitarian social structure.

  The redistribution of wealth, however, invariably seems to involve the rich 1 percent getting richer at the expense of the other 99 percent of the population. In addition, the richest ethnic group to profit and become even richer under this new egalitarianism happens to be, by sheer coincidence, the Jews. How strange! We live in an Orwellian world where not only does peace means war and freedom means slavery but where egalitarianism, or making people equal, actually means making people less equal.

In the neoconservative mind, freedom, while desirable, is not a primary political value. Machiavelli had the better idea: expediency is the best way to rule. People need to be manipulatively led by their elites – via open dialogue and democracy if possible, but by deception, coercion and expediency when necessary.

The neoconservatives represent tyranny’s Fifth Column in America. They are deceiving the people into believing that they are genuine conservatives, but like the socialists who were their mentors, they call themselves what they know the people want to hear. These bogus conservatives have now grown to dominate Washington’s think tanks, Wall Street’s brokerages and banks, and many major publications and universities. They are highly influential writers, scholars, pundits, publishers, institute heads, bankers and corporate moguls.

The Enemies Within the Gates

Let’s now mention eight of the more influential neoconservatives in America, past and present. These are not friends of freedom, but enemies. They need to be recognized for who they are, traitors to what America was meant to be. They need to be exposed and attacked as we would attack serpents that are slithering into our back yards to threaten our safety and our families.

Irving Kristol ( Jew) is considered to be the “godfather of neoconservatism.” A powerful liberal writer during the 1950s and 1960s, he had grown disenchanted with the Democratic Party by 1970 and switched to the Republican Party, coining the name “neoconservative” for the band of intellectuals he brought with him. Immensely persuasive in the shaping of the movement.

Norman Podhoretz (Jew) is one of the major founders with Irving Kristol of neoconservatism in the late 1960s. He served as Editor-in-Chief of Commentary magazine from 1960 to 1995, pouring out a myriad of articles and books on the need to build America into an all-pervasive “collectivist state.”

Richard Perle (Jew) is called the “Prince of Darkness” because of his extreme hawkish military stands. He is a member of the Reagan Pentagon, now serves in Washington think tanks such as the Hudson Institute and the American Enterprise Institute. Vehemently promoted the invasion of Iraq, and to this day favors extensive intervention in the Middle East to bring about regime changes.

Paul Wolfowitz (Jew) is the most hawkish advocate in the Bush administration and the architect of the Bush Doctrine. A visiting fellow at the American Enterprise Institute, he is a former World Bank chief and Pentagon official who was closely involved in the decision to invade Iraq in 2003. He has been back and forth between academia and government for the entirety of his career.

William Kristol (Jew) is the son of Irving Kristol and editor of the prestigious Weekly Standard. He was the cofounder of PNAC (Project for the New American Century) with Robert Kagan. He is a widely recognized pundit and influential Washington political operative. Director at the Foreign Policy Initiative and member of numerous think tanks in Washington as well as a Fox News regular.

Robert Kagan (Jew) is co-founder with Bill Kristol of the Project for the New American Century, Kagan is a policy pundit and historian based at the Brookings Institution. He serves also as a contributing editor at The New Republic and, thus, personifies the collectivist liberalism that infuses neoconservatism. They are statist ideological brothers.

Frank Gaffney (Jew) is the director of the hawkish neoconservative Center for Security Policy. He has been a longtime advocate of interventionist U.S. foreign policies, ever-increasing military budgets and aggressive attacks upon the Islamic world. A regular on Fox News.

Charles Krauthammer (Jew) is a writer for The Washington Post. He is considered to be the most influential neoconservative political columnist in America. He is also a Pulitzer Prize winner, Fox News talking head, and was a weekly panelist on the PBS show “Inside Washington” from 1990 to 2013.

There are, of course, many other prominent neoconservatives than just these eight — all of them either Jewish or fanatically devoted to Zionist interests, apparently quite happy to see America become an Israeli colony.

Hundreds of others like Bill Bennett, Elliott Abrams, Joshua Muravchik, James Woolsey, John Bolton, Max Boot, Karl Rove, David Frum and Condoleezza Rice are all assiduously working to advance One World Government throughout the world.

  This is a world in which America dominates the world and the Jews dominate America. Nothing could be simpler than this, and only a fool can fail to perceive it: this is Jewish world domination by the back door.

  No need to mention the Protocols of the Elders of Zion. Forget the Protocols! This is a new way of achieving old ends. First get control of America, and then make America the indisputable superpower.

  This is how a group comprising 0.2 percent of the world’s population can achieve world domination, reducing the rest of mankind to the condition of slaves and vassals.

This comment appeared in entry 'We Are Their Slaves!' on 05/04/15, 10:41 AM. (go to entry to post a reply)

DanielS wrote:

To problematize not only the Jews, but objectivism by contrast to our relative systemic interests, is a necessary corrective in favor of ecology and accountability to historical/systemic maintenance; against what is now an ancient habit for Europeans of objectivism (which is susceptible and weak on agentive deliberation).


Hermeneutics, European hemeneutics, was devised as a part of that corrective process; although GW did have a point in this conversation that it can have perils as well if not managed properly or taken into the wrong hands. Its empirical end is meant to offset wild speculation; also acting as systemic corrective is inclusion of the perspective of those temporarily marginalized. Marginal participation and perspective would imply those just within the borders of the system but having interest in its maintenance. In addition to wildly exaggerating the speculative end of hermeneutics, Jewish interests have perverted the notion of “marginal” participation - treating those without the system and interested in its transformation as being the marginals in need of advocacy.

This comment appeared in entry 'MR Radio: Prof. MacDonald in conversation with GW and DanielS' on 05/04/15, 03:37 AM. (go to entry to post a reply)

DanielS wrote:

GW,

How often does anyone besides DanielS still post here? How many people still regularly read? I don’t know what your goal was in handing over MR to DanielS, but unless it was to drive away everyone except DanielS, I don’t think it’s succeeded.

n/a, this is your wishful thinking and obviously not true. All one has to do is look upon the interviews that we’ve conducted in the last few months.

Next, we are still in the process of making changes. We should be adding a new and fine writer shortly.

I understand you don’t like Nazis, and DanielS doesn’t like Nazis.

Good, I’m glad you understand that. Too bad you didn’t bother to read what I’ve written above before trying to bury it as if its worthless.


But (1) re: the interview, I think you’re completely misguided in believing you must somehow win an internet battle with those who sympathize with WWII Germany before your brand of nationalism can be ascendant.

We are not trying to win the battle with them, we are distinguishing ourselves from them for whom it may concern (i.e., normal people, who are put off by Hitler and Nazism).

Not only is that not misguided, it is crucial that people have this platform available.

If you won the heart and mind of every pro-Nazi WN on the internet, you still will not have begun to reach the number of people you’ll need to reach to achieve any real success.

I can’t speak for GW, but I am not trying to win them over. They have their own holes to crawl in.


So it would make sense to me to simply ignore the former and focus on the overwhelming majority of the population who are not pro-Nazi internet WNs.

We will, but it has been necessary to mark this distinction at least for a time.


The left did not win power by first stamping out every fringe leftist movement. (2) Even if you choose to continue with this misguided quest, I don’t think someone like DanielS is going to change anyone’s mind (if anything, he’s probably pushed more people in the opposite direction).

That is your wish, but won’t be true. There are three kinds or four kinds who would have a problem with me. Nazi and Jesus people, of course. But they have other places to go. There might be Nordicist snobs who don’t like me but there is a mistake in that, because I do advocate maintaining their distinction.

There is another kind who may feel that they are beyond me intellectually. To this kind I would reply that I do not reject people or send them away because they may be sharper or more accomplished than me. On the contrary, I welcome them to participate and show us how its done.

If what they have to say is any good, I’d be inclined to turn it into a lead post.

DanielS,

“I would not want his image to appear along side Nazi imagery, even if critical. But that is the problem with the Hitler advocates. They force a response when and how one might not like.”

No, no one forced you to post anything.

Listen buddy, the kind of bs that Truck Roy was putting across in that very popular podcast required a rebut.

And nobody forced Stormfront to choose its obvious name, with its allusion reinforced by obvious typeface.


If you don’t want to come across as deranged, stop posting deranged responses to people who in the broader picture are irrelevant.

Stormfront is the most popular White Nationalist website. It is necessary to distinguish MR from its errors. Nothing deranged about it. Your comments are way off the mark.


I would also suggest not spamming the comments of every post with links. Start an open thread and post the links there, so that if anyone besides you and GW are left here, they have a chance to have on-topic discussions without being drowned out by you.

Thanks for the “well meaning” advice. Now take it and go start a blog of your own. Since we are so hopeless here, you don’t have to worry about us.

This comment appeared in entry 'MR Radio: Prof. MacDonald in conversation with GW and DanielS' on 05/03/15, 10:32 PM. (go to entry to post a reply)

n/a wrote:

GW,

How often does anyone besides DanielS still post here? How many people still regularly read? I don’t know what your goal was in handing over MR to DanielS, but unless it was to drive away everyone except DanielS, I don’t think it’s succeeded.

I understand you don’t like Nazis, and DanielS doesn’t like Nazis. But (1) re: the interview, I think you’re completely misguided in believing you must somehow win an internet battle with those who sympathize with WWII Germany before your brand of nationalism can be ascendant. If you won the heart and mind of every pro-Nazi WN on the internet, you still will not have begun to reach the number of people you’ll need to reach to achieve any real success. So it would make sense to me to simply ignore the former and focus on the overwhelming majority of the population who are not pro-Nazi internet WNs. The left did not win power by first stamping out every fringe leftist movement. (2) Even if you choose to continue with this misguided quest, I don’t think someone like DanielS is going to change anyone’s mind (if anything, he’s probably pushed more people in the opposite direction).


DanielS,

“I would not want his image to appear along side Nazi imagery, even if critical. But that is the problem with the Hitler advocates. They force a response when and how one might not like.”

No, no one forced you to post anything. If you don’t want to come across as deranged, stop posting deranged responses to people who in the broader picture are irrelevant.

I would also suggest not spamming the comments of every post with links. Start an open thread and post the links there, so that if anyone besides you and GW are left here, they have a chance to have on-topic discussions without being drowned out by you.

This comment appeared in entry 'MR Radio: Prof. MacDonald in conversation with GW and DanielS' on 05/03/15, 10:08 PM. (go to entry to post a reply)

Systemic maintenance requirement wrote:

http://age-of-treason.com/2015/04/28/fear-and-loathing-and-treason-part-1/#comment-14336

And Tan, this is one of the reasons why monocausality is to be avoided. It makes one myopic in a world that should be investigated processually.

The Jews as the “every problem “will be used by Hitler worshipers as a part of their desperation to justify his program across the board - which translates to antagonizing and dividing most of Europe.

There is no need to be paranoid that someone is necessarily trying to distract from the JQ if they are taking care of and understanding their own system, including its susceptiblities.

Jews have predominant influence in 7 key niches and vigilance must be turned most often to these elite positions: religion, finance, law, media, business (esp. international), academia and politics.

The problem that I can see with a term such as “pathological altruism” is that it is a psychologism - too narrowly packed onto the psyche rather than looked upon in social terms, which would be the more fruitful investigation - and again, both our positive maintenance and problems ought to be looked upon as an engaged, interactive, reflexive and ongoing social process.

Fine, we look at the Jews as most crucial among problems, but we have our own system to take care of as well.

Recognizing our susceptibilities does not let the Jews off the hook for exploiting these openings.

In the service of defending our system and not getting caught up in mere reaction to Jews, I am satisfied that my structuring (which Katana dishonestly tries to say is obfuscatory) of two problems - Jewish interests on the one hand and objectivism on the other - provides a good, orientative balance (in particular, we need to correct objectivism with acknowledgment of the validity of our relative group interests). Objectivism, which would outstrip that, carried to its logical extreme, is both compelling as a means to power and as a means to get beyond guilt, but is easily exploited by Jews.

To problematize not only the Jews, but objectivism by contrast to our relative systemic interests, is a necessary corrective in favor of ecology and accountability to historical/systemic maintenance against what is now an ancient habit for Europeans for objectivism (which is susceptible and weak on agentive deliberation).



*I understand Katana’s problem. To him, hermeneutic process is “waffling” when we should all just fall in line behind Hitler.

This comment appeared in entry 'MR Radio: Prof. MacDonald in conversation with GW and DanielS' on 05/03/15, 09:46 PM. (go to entry to post a reply)

"Left" as anti:national/ tradition, class divisive wrote:

“The Left” unnecessarily construed as anti-national, anti-traditional and class divisive in Collin Liddell’s

“The First Leftist Genocide of The Twentieth Century”


I reject as facile and obstructive to White organization these distinctions that Colin Liddell makes:

“Liberals and Leftists have an built-in tendency to veer towards a “dictatorship of the proletariat” mentality — the desire to take power on behalf on the “less fortunate” and “less enlightened,” in order to make the radical changes they feel are necessary.”

It is not built-in. And what we would be basically “dictatorial” about is the border surrounding the whole people, not just the workers and the unfortunate.

The central commitment to a false either/or that has gained convention in journalese and has been exploited by Jewish interests to prevent the effective unionization of our interests as Whites:

“within the context of Turkish politics, it was clearly a left-leaning anti-nationalist organization”

There is no reason why a left, i.e., a unionization, has to be anti-traditional, anti-national or pitting less fortunate against more fortunate. On the contrary, it can facilitate accountability to these interests all around.

This comment appeared in entry 'MR Radio: Prof. MacDonald in conversation with GW and DanielS' on 05/03/15, 07:28 PM. (go to entry to post a reply)

Jews develop blacks as revolutionaries wrote:

E. Michael Jones: Jews turned blacks into revolutionaries to overthrow the government of The United States; from inception of revolutionary spirit in The N.A.A.C.P. to the government’s successful overthrow by means of “The Civil Rights” movement.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=O7l_da7b2jg;

This comment appeared in entry 'MR Radio: Prof. MacDonald in conversation with GW and DanielS' on 05/03/15, 06:47 PM. (go to entry to post a reply)

plumber mathis presents wrote:

AH founder of Israel

http://www.resist.com/war_network/radio_station/war_radio_2015/20150106-TT.mp3

This comment appeared in entry 'Soren Renner at VoR' on 05/03/15, 05:10 PM. (go to entry to post a reply)

Muslim mayor of Tower Hamlets wrote:

Truth, Honesty and Faith in Allah: The Rise and Fall of Lutfur Rahman - Tobias Langdon, May 2, 2015 [/url]

Do you have a deep respect for the integrity of lawyers? Do you have an abiding trust in the veracity of Muslims? Then I’m afraid you’re going to be sadly disappointed by Lutfur Rahman and his many supporters. This highly trained lawyer made history as Britain’s first Muslim mayor, winning two elections in the proudly vibrant London borough of Tower Hamlets. Now he has made history again: a high-court judge called Richard Mawrey has just ruled that Rahman is guilty of corruption and illegal practices. He has been stripped of his mayoralty and barred from standing in any future election.

Triumph of the Villains

It’s a final triumph for Rahman’s racist and Islamophobic enemies, who could not bear to see a brown-skinned Muslim mayor fighting for the oppressed and impoverished Bangladeshi residents of Tower Hamlets. That, at least, is the story Rahman and his supporters will now be spinning. And why not? Accusations of racism and Islamophobia have proved very useful to Muslims who combine gross corruption with farcical incompetence.


http://www.theoccidentalobserver.net/2015/05/truth-honesty-and-faith-in-allah-the-rise-and-fall-of-lutfur-rahman/

This comment appeared in entry 'The problem of the Establishment mentality – Part 4' on 05/03/15, 02:32 AM. (go to entry to post a reply)

Behind Baltimore wrote:

Keith Alexander and James Edwards provide and informative take on the Baltimore riots and the powers-that-be aiding and abetting them.

http://lnrlive.com/tpc/tpc20150502a.mp3

This comment appeared in entry 'MR Radio: Prof. MacDonald in conversation with GW and DanielS' on 05/03/15, 01:23 AM. (go to entry to post a reply)

a period of unstable coalitions wrote:

THE MILIBAND MASQUERADE? - by Colin Liddell, Saturday, 2 May 2015

Democratic politics always has had an ugly side, both in the types of personalities it attracts and the devious behaviour it encourages. The main reason for this is that it allows the broad masses to vote, lowering the audience IQ to a level that incentivizes the low-grade deceptions of unscrupulous politicians.

Ugly as it is, it certainly didn’t get any more aesthetically pleasing when Ed Miliband was elected leader of the Labour Party in 2010. With his robotic style and rubbery face, he evokes Mr. Bean possessed by the last of the Body Snatchers, or a piece of “Wallace and Gromit” claymation gone wrong.

For the present general election campaign, which will end on May 7th, a long, hard effort has gone into making “Ed” seem warm and personable – he was actually fitted out with a (rather ugly) wife shortly after becoming leader and was also designated as the father of her two children, although they clearly resemble their mother much more than their supposed father.

In an attempt to ‘humanize’ this unlikely leadership material he was also carefully coached on body language, facial gestures, voice, and positioning. The process has some similarities to a necrophile heating up the inamorata with which he has just eloped from the local mortuary.

One of the main problems with Ed is not his Jewishness (because British people, like all good people everywhere, have been taught and constantly reminded that anti-Semitism is a no-no), but rather his swarthiness.

This would be less of a problem in the Conservative Party, which famously had a Prime Minister in the Victorian era who was almost a spitting image of the popular Happy Merchant meme but it is definitely a problem for the Labour Party, which has increasingly become a sump hole for the non-White vote. Having Ed as leader makes the party look a bit too ethnic, something that has a subtle but powerful ethnicizing effect on British politics.

This is just one factor in the phenomenal rise of the SNP in Scotland, where it has displaced Labour. There is also a slow fuse burning in the North of England. Here the Labour vote is still holding up, but it must be remembered that this is the party that over the last two decades, oversaw the mass rape of the children of its bedrock Northern White constituents, with its only concern being the fear that somebody might think a nasty “racist” thought.

Despite his enormous flaws and limitations, “Awkward Ed” has a fighting chance because his main opponent, David Cameron, is viewed negatively as (a) the lackey of the rich in a time of austerity, (b) a gay-marriage-promoting betrayer of ordinary conservative values, and (c) a useless bulwark against the power of the EU.

The fallout of all this is that this is the first election in which neither of the two main parties of government has a realistic chance of securing a clear majority. Yes, we are headed for a period of unstable coalition government and possibly several general elections within the next few months.


http://alternative-right.blogspot.com/2015/05/the-milliband-masquerade_2.html#more

This comment appeared in entry 'The problem of the Establishment mentality – Part 4' on 05/03/15, 12:52 AM. (go to entry to post a reply)

unpc dowunder wrote:

Over the last decade or so, the alternative right has tended to divide into two camps - those who emphasis the Jewish role in anti-white thinking and those who blame North European liberalism. Regardless of which side has the stronger argument we still need to explain why whites have been so receptive to arguments based on individualism (whether pushed by Jews or gentiles) and radical egalitarianism (as opposed to just class-based economic egalitarianism).

Hence, it’s great to see the debate moving onto the reasons for the vulnerability of whites to individualistic liberal thinking. I think part of the reason for the sudden, dramatic shift to liberalism (both right and left wing) has been the decline of Southern European cultural influence among North Europeans.

Classics (and therefore the ideas of the Ancient Greeks and Romans) are no longer taught much to western elites, Catholicism is declining, Aristotle is no longer really seen as a great intellectual, and fascism is regarded as totally without positive qualities (as opposed to being a mixed bag of good an bad ideas that was pushed too far). The Italians and French also lost a lot of cultural status among Americans and North Europeans after their their association with fascism and their poor showing in WWII (which made them look corrupt, nepotistic and cowardly). Hence they no longer have the same kind of cultural influence they had before WWII.


The result of this has been that individualistic North European and Jewish thinkers have had too much cultural influence, while more ethnocentric (and Jew savvy) Southern and Central European thinkers (from Aristotle, right through to modern ““Archeofuturists”) haven’t had much impact.

 

This comment appeared in entry 'MR Radio: Prof. MacDonald in conversation with GW and DanielS' on 05/02/15, 11:31 PM. (go to entry to post a reply)

Cohen's BBC programming wrote:

This comment appeared in entry 'MR Radio: Prof. MacDonald in conversation with GW and DanielS' on 05/02/15, 03:08 PM. (go to entry to post a reply)

"Far Right" protest Hasidics wrote:

Far right plans march against ‘Jewification of Britain’ in Stamford Hill

http://www.independent.co.uk/news/uk/home-news/far-right-plans-march-against-jewification-of-britain-in-stamford-hill-10017859.html

Anti-fascists have pledged to stop far-right nationalists who plan to march through an area of London with a large Jewish population.

Organisers claim to be fighting against what they call the “Jewification” of the UK, and a civilian security group run by volunteers from the Hasidic Jewish community in London.

This comment appeared in entry 'MR Radio: Prof. MacDonald in conversation with GW and DanielS' on 05/02/15, 03:00 PM. (go to entry to post a reply)

Resnick goes nuts wrote:

Steward Resnik is the second largest agricultural land owner in California.

Almonds and other nuts take a great deal of water and compete heavily against other needs for water.

http://www.npr.org/2015/04/30/403283276/drought-in-calif-creates-water-wars-between-farmers-developers-residents

This comment appeared in entry '"To ensure that Wikipedia is Zionist in nature"' on 05/02/15, 11:39 AM. (go to entry to post a reply)

Jews, Muslims allied against Europe wrote:

Jews and Muslims as allied brothers against Europe:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=N7zoPu6wbrI

Good comment by Franklin Ryckaert at TOO
May 1, 2015 - 1:52 am | Permalink

Judaism and Islam have indeed many similarities, as the author of this article has indicated. (She could also have mentioned the similarities between Jewish Halacha and Islamic Fiqh as their respective legal systems are called).

There are however some crucial differences :

Judaism is an exclusive ethnic religion, to which conversion is discouraged. Islam is an inclusive universal religion, bent on converting the whole world. Both religions are supremacist in orientation, but they differ in strategy. Judaism, being a minority religion, has developed a cunning stealthy elite strategy. Islam, being a majority religion, has developed a vulgar violent mob strategy. Both religions have become highly successful. The Jews have become the hidden (and hostile!) elite of the whole Western world, while the Muslims have conquered by sheer violence and a high birthrate a considerable part of the world. The Jewish strategy is high IQ, the Muslim strategy is low IQ.

Though they quarrel in the Middle East over a territorial dispute, in the Western diaspora they are inclined to cooperate in their conflict with Christian Europeans, like they did in Muslim Spain and in the Ottoman Empire.

It is an illusion to think that either one of them can be our ally in a conflict with the other.”

This comment appeared in entry 'MR Radio: Prof. MacDonald in conversation with GW and DanielS' on 05/02/15, 10:15 AM. (go to entry to post a reply)

White Argentinian wrote:

William Johnson interviews a Southern woman who rejects feminism but defends White woman against anti-woman exaggerations typical of WN.

I believe it was this same woman who had previously said something which made me angry, namely that “non-Whites have all of South America.”

Thankfully, in this show, Johnson invites an Argentinian man named Augustine to set the record straight.


http://www.renegadebroadcasting.com/american-freedom-party-talk-show-4-30-15/


Keep your electric eye on me, babe - check out the audience: White English women in rapture.

This comment appeared in entry 'MR Radio: Prof. MacDonald in conversation with GW and DanielS' on 05/01/15, 06:45 PM. (go to entry to post a reply)

Creative protest of London Hasidics to be May 2 wrote:

Stamford Hill and the Campaign against the “Jewification of Britain”
May 1, 2015 — Enza Ferreri

Until a few years, or even one year, ago I wouldn’t have believed that an anti-Jewish —(not anti-Israel) mass protest by Whites (not by Muslims) could have taken place in Britain.

And yet, a march against the “Jewification of Great Britain” was planned by Joshua Bonehill, the 22-year-old leader of National Liberation. Scheduled for 22 March, it was called “Liberate Stamford Hill”, after an area of north-east London home to about 20,000 Jews. This is a poster of the proposed demo, which according to The Guardian was reading: “On 22nd of March as one white and unified mass movement we will be finally pointing the finger in the right direction … You owe it to your race white man.

The namesake Facebook page of the campaign appearing on the poster has been removed, and if you search it on FB you’ll end up with its opposite: “Liberate Stamford Hill from Fascists”.

The poster shows the photos of two phenomena appearing in the streets of Stamford Hill that the White Nationalists oppose: a member of the Shomrim, the corporate Jewish Police that started patrolling the neighbourhood in the wake of the Charlie Hebdo attacks on Jews, and a Jewish sign telling women on which side of the road they should walk.

The campaign’s Twitter account has also been taken down. Since announcing the Liberate Stamford Hill march, Bonehill and other 5 of its organisers have been arrested, with 3 of them banned from entering London.

As a result, the protest has been postponed to May 2. This is, as the Daily Bale News website puts it, “due to unprecedented mass abuse of police powers previously never applied to the Jewish EDL”, a reference to the Jewish connections of the pro-Israel English Defence League, whose target has mostly been Islam.

But Stamford Hill has not been quiet in recent times. On the planned day of the postponed protest, a group of over 20 men and women stormed a synagogue in the area. The blog Endzog reported:

  Six indigenous white Fascists from the new fascist movement Liberate also known as ‘National Liberation’ protesting against the Jewish Occupation of Britain have been arrested after an antisemitic attack by 20 Liberate and associated activists at a synagogue in the Jewish Occupied settlement and mini theocratic state of Stamford Hill North London — leaving one Jew needing minor hospital treatment after Jews turned violent in the fracas.

  As Jews have used their huge financial power to buy up properties in the area over the years, the indigenous people have been gradually forced out. Meanwhile Jewish MPs and Jewish controlled local councils have brought several million 3rd world immigrants into London to ethnically cleanse it of English people.

A small demo organised by other nationalist groups did take place in Stamford Hill on 18th April.

Another possibly related episode concerns a store in Tottenham, another district in north London, belonging to the mobile (or cell) phone giant company EE. Staff at the shop refused to give phone chargers to at least two Orthodox Jewish men wearing traditional attire.

Assistant manager Daniel Reid was contacted by The Jewish Chronicle and reportedly told the paper: “There is no discrimination in our business. I am black and Christian. I am not being funny, Jewish people are very arrogant but we serve them to the best of our ability. I do find them arrogant.”

The allegation of “arrogance” is interesting, because it is not isolated. In July 2010 Christina Patterson, a Stamford Hill resident who was for ten years until 2013 a journalist on the staff of The Independent, wrote a column, “The limits of multi-culturalism”, in which she complained of the bad manners of the Hasidic Jews living in her neighbourhood:

  I would like to say to the man from whom I bought some paper cups, and who handled my money as if it had been dipped in anthrax, that it wouldn’t kill him to say “please” or “thank you”, and I would like to say to the fishmonger who asked my (black) friend whether he really wanted to buy some fish from his shop, that you should probably assume that if someone is asking for fish in your shop, then the answer is in the affirmative.

  And I would like to say to the little boy who sat bang in the middle of two seats on the bus and who, when I tried to sit next to him, leapt up as if infection from the ebola virus was imminent, that it does slightly make one feel like a pariah, and I would like to say to the women who roam the streets with double-decker pushchairs and vast armies of children, that it’s sometimes nice to allow someone else to get past, and I would like to say to all these people that I don’t care if they wear frock-coats, and funny suits and hats covered in plastic bags, and insist on wearing their hair in ringlets (if they’re male) or covered up by wigs (if they’re female), but I do think they could treat their neighbours with a bit more courtesy and just a little bit more respect.

  When I moved to Stamford Hill, 12 years ago, I didn’t realise that goyim were about as welcome in the Hasidic Jewish shops as Martin Luther King at a Klu Klux Klan convention. I didn’t realise that a purchase by a goy was a crime to be punished with monosyllabic terseness, or that bus seats were a potential source of contamination, or that road signs, and parking restrictions, were for people who hadn’t been chosen by God. And while none of this is a source of anything much more than irritation, when I see an eight-year-old boy recoiling from a normal-looking woman (because, presumably, he has been taught that she is dirty or dangerous, or, heaven forbid, dripping with menstrual blood) it makes me sad…

  [T]here’s nothing in the Torah to say that…  goyim should be treated with contempt.

There certainly is in the Talmud.

Hasidic Jews of Stamford Hill, North London:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pVsc_7nodlM

  There are now estimated to be around 1.3m Haredi [of which Hasidim are a part] worldwide, and according to a 2007 study by Dr Yaakov Wise at the University of Manchester, strictly-orthodox Jewry in Europe is expanding more rapidly than at any time since before the Second World War. In Britain — home to the largest Haredi community in Europe — almost three out of every four Jewish births are in the Haredi community. If current trends continue, the strictly-Orthodox will constitute the majority of British Jews by 2050. [Emphasis added]

High birth rates are something we normally associate with Muslims.


The similarities between Islam and Judaism, both of which are particularist and supremacist doctrines, full of contempt for those who don’t believe in them, are astounding. Indeed, the comments on the behavior of Hasidic Jews in London echo the notorious behavior of Hasidic Jews in Postville, Iowa. They had no interest in developing social ties with their new neighbors or conform to community norms..


There are also similarities between Muslim and Jewish communities living in Britain and in Western countries generally, and the problems they cause


..both have a different ethical code for the treatment of ingroup and outgroup members (“What you do to the goyim is not the same as what you do to Jews”); both are obsessed with purity and with not being contaminated by the impure kaffir or goyim; both consider kaffir or goyim not quite human and think that these outsiders’ purpose is to be their own slaves; both have ways of separating men from women and consider contact between the sexes to be avoided; both have arranged marriages; both have their own courts; both have their own police. Both, in short, are Middle Eastern cultures.

Full article at TOO: http://www.theoccidentalobserver.net/2015/05/stamford-hill-and-the-campaign-against-the-jewification-of-britain/

 

This comment appeared in entry 'MR Radio: Prof. MacDonald in conversation with GW and DanielS' on 05/01/15, 11:07 AM. (go to entry to post a reply)

Funky Town wrote:

On the other hand, qualities would determine what is below standard as well.

Why anybody should have been subject to “Funky Town”, ever, let alone have to hear it repeatedly on the public air waves would be unintelligible were it not for what we now know of the YKW:

I was reminded of this having heard it (bellowing from a restaurant onto a Poznan street!) just moments ago…

“Won’t you take me to funky town”:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=liuCTk2nPG8

Another abuse of the public air has been:

“Boogie Nights”:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2XEmFuEbpzM

“Dance with the boogie get down…got to keep on dancin’, keep on dancin”

How could it be that one has to hear this?

It calls for ostracism from community standards.

It creates a strange and alienating environment. Beyond hostile - it is torture…then when we get into the strains of rap music, we are talking anti-White war music - an even more extreme of alien and hostile environment is created.

This comment appeared in entry 'MR Radio: Prof. MacDonald in conversation with GW and DanielS' on 05/01/15, 07:01 AM. (go to entry to post a reply)

DanielS wrote:

Greg Johnson and Hugh MacDonald (not to be confused with Prof. Kevin MacDonald) discuss: Vanity, Pretentiousness and Snobbery

http://www.counter-currents.com/2015/05/vanity-pretentiousness-and-snobbery/

You can get some value out of just about any Greg Johnson discussion. This one much less than others. Why? Because he is trying to fit a square peg into a round hole. More aptly, he is trying to compare incommensurate roles in the functional ecology of a racial system.

Greg wants very strongly to hold to the polemic of THE left as the enemy.

At least in so doing, in this discussion, he elaborates his motive for elitism and takes it farther in an effort to justify vanity, pretentiousness and snobbery.

Of course, in discussing these three vices, he misses the qualitative point, the spirit of the distinction of these vices which make them condemnable.

And in suggesting that he should be among an elite cadre he is only further exposing in this discussion why some might justifiably not wish to look upon him in that way.

However, there is another way to look at this matter of “elite capabilities, skill development” and processes of evolution:

There is common advice for racialists in WN circles - learn a trade, something like pluming, electronics, mechanics..some skill that people need, where your politics are irrelevant and where people aren’t going to judge, or even ask you about personal matters.

Are these people better in some ways? Yes. Is what they are doing important and warranting respect? Of course.

I look upon Greg’s work in having analyzed a myriad of texts and his certifiable skill in parsing philosophers and philosophical matters as an invaluable task - one which is technically neutral enough, like mechanics, that it makes personal life, even his obnoxious elitist politics, far less important than his helpful orientation on these technical matters

Greg has a qualitative niche, an important part, in a White leftist scheme. One would hope that would be enough.

As everyone, there are ways in which Greg could be looked upon as suspect of being worthy to occupy a commanding presence among an elite cadre on a permanent basis to look after us all - including in important matters of judgment. This very discussion betrays that, when so often the perspective that he is inclined to value only plays into that which has gotten us into this mess in the first place. I won’t dredge up my arguments with what has been his security blanket of “the greatest statesman, Hitler”, Dyal, Nietzshe, and the perspective toward an overvaluation of a view toward men that some of the guys over there at CC take, but there is a serious implication that his judgement might not best be accepted as above all. Still, I can accept him as having an important place and providing invaluable advice. I’d be reluctant to accept his position and judgements as abiding and binding across the board, on all matters.

That is not to say that accomplished academics should not feel good about and be rewarded accordingly to what they do better than other folks; and they may or may not be above vulgar vices of others. But others are likely to have skills and abilities, which play into both individual and full systemic judgment and orientation, that are invaluable to systemic maintenance and should be accorded respect and honor.

It is disrespectful and a serious error of discouraging participation to polemicize against the union of European people and its incentives for participation - looking for defects to exclude people rather than looking for value in members; and justice - and propose that some people, like the wonderous Dyal (who doesn’t find White men cute enough) should have some fixed, quantitative role above others.

It has nothing to do with equality and inequality.

Anti-egalitarianism or being against “equality” is to play into a false and destructive paradigm, a Jewish trap as surely as any.

We are dealing with qualitative issues of commensurability and incommensurability or we are playing a fools language game, doing the bidding of Jews and the very objectivist traitors who sold us out to begin with.

This comment appeared in entry 'MR Radio: Prof. MacDonald in conversation with GW and DanielS' on 05/01/15, 04:39 AM. (go to entry to post a reply)

To accommodate immigrants in Stockholm.. wrote:

A whole new Stockholm will have to be built to accommodate immigrants…and it will have to happen at the great burden of Swedish taxpayers..

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=w7IaCcAJQwY#t=44

This comment appeared in entry 'Prof.MacDonald: Psychological Mechanism of White Dispossession' on 04/30/15, 08:17 PM. (go to entry to post a reply)

Lindtner + Humphreys wrote:

Lindtner + Humphreys

Christian Lindtner and Kenneth Humphreys to appear in international conference:

  FYI: There will be an important international conference on the New Testament in Roskilde, Denmark on June 21-24, 2015

  Gospel Interpretation and Q-Hypothesis.

This comment appeared in entry 'MR Radio: Prof. MacDonald in conversation with GW and DanielS' on 04/30/15, 06:22 PM. (go to entry to post a reply)

Multicultural organizationas in London wrote:

While looking something up for another post I came across a link of a list of Multicultural Organizations in one single London Borough, Kingston upon Thames. According to Wikipedia Kingston Upon Thames is 63% White British, the total population is 160,000.  It is also known for the coronation of ancient English Kings such as Athelstan and Ethelred The Unready. What in God’s name would Ethelred have made of this obvious attempt to genocide his people we can only guess at.

‘’ From 991 onwards, Æthelred paid tribute, or Danegeld, to the Danish king. In 1002, Æthelred ordered a massacre of Danish settlers.’‘

If Third World people need this amount of support to be able to live in one of the most affluent areas on earth then they obviously are not here for any other reason than to replace the natives, regardless of their undying love of the NHS and ‘‘The Economy’‘.

African and Caribbean Relatives and Residents Association Elders Project

Information and support for African Caribbean elders on sheltered housing, residential and nursing care. Advice for families, carers and professionals. Support for realities groups in Lambeth, Manchester and Birmingham. Publish a directory
of sheltered housing and residential care for African Caribbean elders and good practice guides on food, leisure resources and relatives involvement in homes.
5 Tavistock Place
London WC1H 9SN
Tel: 020 7692 4305
Fax: 020 7916 0515

African and Caribbean Voices Association
Reminiscence activities provided for and with elders from Africa (including Uganda, Nigeria, Sierra Leone) and the Caribbean (includind Dominica, Jamaica, St Kitts, St Lucia). Training in public speaking and presentation, story telling and writing and
internet training. Organise outings and reminiscence events at a range of venues and community centres.
Unit 3 Durning Hall
Earlham Grove
Newhamondon E7 9AB
Tel: 020 8536 3822

African Community Involvement Association
Provides information and support for people and families who are infected by HIV/AIDS, covering all areas affecting African people across the board within the borough of Kingston, at the Welcare Centre, every first Wednesday of each month and across other boroughs in South London.
Justin Plaza 3
Viceroy Suite 1
341 London Road
Mitcham
Surrey CR4 4BE
Tel: 020 8687 2400/0208 640 9479
Fax: 020 8646 4363
Email: .(JavaScript must be enabled to view this email address)
.(JavaScript must be enabled to view this email address)
Website: http://www.acia-uk.org

African Families Support Services
Established to address issues relating to poverty, sickness, education, guidance, social exclusion, support and advice on social and health issues to African communities living in London, particularly refugees, asylum seekers, youth and those
affected by HIV / Aids.
Flat Afss, Chichester House
145a London Road
Kingston
Surrey KT2 6NH
Tel: 020 8974 9993
Fax: 020 8547 3139
Email: .(JavaScript must be enabled to view this email address)
Website: http://www.afss.org

Association for Sierra Leonean Refugees (ASLER)
Advice, advocacy, counselling and practical help for refugees, asylum seekers and migrants from Sierra Leone. Advice on benefits, housing, immigration and health. Interpreting and translation. Befriending and home support for older people and
their carers. Evening classes for disadvantaged African children and counselling sessions.
Unit B01
Macbean Centre
Macbean Street
London SE18 6LW
Tel: 020 8855 4681
Email: .(JavaScript must be enabled to view this email address)
East African Women’s Organisation
59 School Lane
Surbiton
Surrey KT6 7QH
Tel: 020 8288 9135

Ghana Union London Umbrella organisation for 50 affiliated Ghanaian groups. Information and advice for the African communities on benefits, employment, housing, immigration, education, health and care services. Day services (at Ampthill Square TA Hall, Camden) for elderly and disabled people with games, music and social activities. Supplementary school for children.
431 Caledonian Road
London N7 9BG
Tel : 020 700 3225
Email : .(JavaScript must be enabled to view this email address)

Ilawe-Ekiti Assocation UK (Nigerian State)
Social and advisory group for the Ilawe-Ekiti community in the UK. Advice on benefits, housing rights, Health, mental health, emotional and family problems. Limited home visiting, support and transport to appointments for older or frail members of the community. Social events, outings and an annual holiday.
152 Brooke Road
London N16 7RR
Tel : 020 8806 4097
Fax : 020 8806 4087

etc etc

:

http://nwioqeqkdf.blogspot.com/2015/04/a-small-slice-of-england.html

 

This comment appeared in entry 'MR Radio: Prof. MacDonald in conversation with GW and DanielS' on 04/30/15, 04:46 PM. (go to entry to post a reply)

Ask me if I care wrote:

Katana, yes, we don’t get how perfect Hitler was, how he had it figured-out perfectly.

“The three of you still don’t get it, but you will eventually, I hope.”

Katana, you don’t get it. Though you have tried to pretend it isn’t true before, there is NEVER a case where I am indulging in words for words sake and not getting to the point.

I am not confused, I know what I mean (I am not sure if it came across in the conversation or in the edit; haven’t had a chance to listen to it myself yet) but I know that you don’t want people to understand this because you are desperate for them to believe that they need your reverence for Hitler and that they need Hitler when they need neither. Thus, if I make a point, let alone a meaningful one, you are going to freak-out and post BOLD advertisements for Hitler’s anti-Bolshevism to obfuscate and divert from the fact.

Your god, Hitler, was not the only one against Bolshevism. He would not cooperate with others because he wanted their land.

You said that you were going to stick to your Nazi sites, now go to it. Nobody with half a wit wants to go there. You are a bore; everyone knows already what you are going to say: Hitler was perfect, the Nazis could do no wrong. There is nobody more tedious than you. Be glad your comment wasn’t deleted right away. Go fish in your own pond.

This comment appeared in entry 'MR Radio: Prof. MacDonald in conversation with GW and DanielS' on 04/30/15, 02:39 PM. (go to entry to post a reply)

kablabla wrote:

I am saving this comment of katana’s, though I will probably not restore it. It is obfuscation. Readers can go to his site if they want to know his opinion. Here, there have been too many instances when significant matters were under discussion and all he would do is horn-in, obfuscate, suggest that “this was all nonsense” and impose talk about how flawless Hitler was.

This comment appeared in entry 'MR Radio: Prof. MacDonald in conversation with GW and DanielS' on 04/30/15, 09:21 AM. (go to entry to post a reply)

Page 1 of 3505 pages  1 2 3 >  Last ›