Comments posted

Page 1 of 3468 pages  1 2 3 >  Last ›

DanielS wrote:

In listening back on this interview, it becomes evident that I need to clarify the hermeneutic circle in order to demonstrate how it can reconcile “intellectualism” with practical application.

I also need to develop the notion of dishonesty and liberalism among males as secondary sexual characteristics, displays of extraneous logical capacity to attract females (the younger of whom find a short term advantage in liberalism as it allows them to play men off of one another; while men being liberal, bespeak a more independent type), similar as upper classes professing “anti-racism” to lord their “moral superiority” over the lower classes who, being more at risk, are not quite so at leisure to make garish displays of liberalism.


And what to do about it when this dishonesty is at odds with E.G.I.

How much pretending liberalism in order to attract a female is too much pretending? As a recent Ted Sallis article at Counter Currents asked (analogously regarding of mainstream “safe politics”)

http://www.counter-currents.com/2014/09/against-mainstreaming

when does does the pretense become the real agenda… how many times have we shook are heads to find, “they are serious”.  With that, how much expecting of liberalism of males is unreasonable…

Stan does some fantastic work in presenting European advocacy as common sense. However, he is taking for granted some of his own and others intellectual work in preparation for that step. For example, “The Century of Self.”

I don’t agree with the dismissal of intellectualism and I do side with GW’s belief that we need to rebuild the world in our image as Europeans.

Having grown up basically being surrounded by anti-intellectualism (“it’s all bullshit”) I know all too well that sufficient intellectual bearings are imperative to making sense of the world. To be denied this is a vast, arbitrary disservice and to be put at a disadvantage.

While there is a such thing as “pseudo-intellectualsm” it does not apply where relevance of purpose and appropriate intellectual tools for its end are maintained.

I do believe that Stan should have a point that a perfect distinction should not and cannot be drawn between intellectual theorizing and practical application, but Majority Rights will not be a site that quickly bandies charges of “pseudo-intellectualism.”

Our purposes are at hand and never out of sight.

Having said that, if Stan can accept the fact that in the main, MR will tend to heavily favor the intellectual end over popular implementation, he could possibly, if he wants, be a popular podcaster here, running say, a bi-weekly podcast of popular commentary from the perspective of “world Eury.”

This comment appeared in entry 'MR Radio: Stan Hess, DanielS and GW discuss the seventies and activism today' on 10/01/14, 02:47 PM. (go to entry to post a reply)

hehadavoicealready wrote:

Hitler is dead. Good riddance.

This comment appeared in entry 'A Fight at the Highest Level' on 10/01/14, 12:28 PM. (go to entry to post a reply)

legalpuffs wrote:

Nice blog. It inspires me a lot. Thanks for publishing such useful information.
Herbal Potpourri

This comment appeared in entry 'Elitism, secrecy, deception … the way to save white America?' on 10/01/14, 12:15 PM. (go to entry to post a reply)

Weevinandout wrote:

Weev is out of jail.

Maintains:

His innocence

His Constitutional Rights were violated.

Important legal issues were at stake, ignored by the presiding Court.

Sees whereas his home in the Ozarks has been bulldozed and another house built in its place

Empathizes with the Palestinians as a result

Resolves to rebuild his house in the Ozarks after his fight for justice is done.

Sports a swastika tattoo which he got in prison to signify his increased wisdom (oh well, nobody bats a thousand).

Congratulations on enduring and getting out of prison Weev: 14 Words.


 

 

This comment appeared in entry 'Weev Speaks: Hypocrites and Pharisees' on 10/01/14, 11:21 AM. (go to entry to post a reply)

Leon Haller wrote:

L.H. will be taking his views elsewhere. For those interested, he may be contacted at:

.(JavaScript must be enabled to view this email address)

This comment appeared in entry 'Salter: Accept that the State is no longer ours and rebuild radically of our people' on 10/01/14, 02:43 AM. (go to entry to post a reply)

Leon Haller wrote:

L.H. will be taking his views elsewhere. For those interested, he may be contacted at:

.(JavaScript must be enabled to view this email address)

This comment appeared in entry 'It's no. It's Devo-Max. Plus a sop to the English?' on 10/01/14, 02:38 AM. (go to entry to post a reply)

Guest Blogger wrote:

“I originally came to MR by invitation,

But subsequently you have been asked to take your commentary elsewhere because your political/cultural views have been shown to be antagonistic and obstructive to MR’s direction. Nobody worth their salt wants to read ongoing comments that request that you take your concerns elsewhere, repetitious comments necessitated because you refuse to stop trolling here. It is hard to believe that you “don’t get it.” The far more plausible scenario is that you are a troll with an agenda to undermine and re-direct (misdirect) MR’s platform.

...“and later stayed because I wanted to learn about European (and specifically British) efforts on race.”

We will be bringing in European and specifically British Editors/Contributors when opportune.

This comment appeared in entry 'It's no. It's Devo-Max. Plus a sop to the English?' on 10/01/14, 02:23 AM. (go to entry to post a reply)

Leon Haller wrote:

I originally came to MR by invitation, and later stayed because I wanted to learn about European (and specifically British) efforts on race. I wish MR kept to a more European focus (I suspect others who have been participants here do as well).

On an apposite note, I was surprised that there has been no comment (that I have seen) mentioning the recent death of Ian Paisley. I liked him, despite his virulent and ignorant anti-Papism. I have always supported an independent Ulster. Where was he on nonwhite immigration? He always seemed like a very solid nationalist, at least from a view Stateside.

This comment appeared in entry 'It's no. It's Devo-Max. Plus a sop to the English?' on 10/01/14, 02:05 AM. (go to entry to post a reply)

Ebolasenthome wrote:

And so it begins exactly as I predicted: He went to the emergency room with flu like symptoms and they ... wait for it .... SENT HIM HOME.

http://www.nbcdfw.com/video/#!/news/local/Dallas-Hospital-Patient-Fighting-Ebola-Virus/277694491

This comment appeared in entry 'Ebola' on 10/01/14, 01:56 AM. (go to entry to post a reply)

Guessedworker wrote:

OK, the MP3 is streaming.

This comment appeared in entry 'MR Radio: Stan Hess, DanielS and GW discuss the seventies and activism today' on 09/30/14, 12:14 PM. (go to entry to post a reply)

Guessedworker wrote:

OK, checking that now.

This comment appeared in entry 'MR Radio: Stan Hess, DanielS and GW discuss the seventies and activism today' on 09/30/14, 11:55 AM. (go to entry to post a reply)

Guest Blogger wrote:

Not getting the link on the radio page

This comment appeared in entry 'MR Radio: Stan Hess, DanielS and GW discuss the seventies and activism today' on 09/30/14, 11:42 AM. (go to entry to post a reply)

FriendofMR wrote:

and so it begins…. flu season is upon us and the early days of ebola symptoms are “flu-like” and no one in authority has mentioned the possible confusion—not one of these goddamn idiots.


http://www.usatoday.com/story/news/nation/2014/09/29/dallas-hospital-isolates-possible-ebola-patient/16461507/

DALLAS — A Dallas hospital is holding a patient in “strict isolation” as that person is being evaluated for possible exposure to the deadly Ebola virus.

Texas Health Presbyterian Hospital in Dallas said in a statement Monday that the patient’s symptoms and recent travel indicated a case of Ebola, the virus that has killed more than 3,000 people across West Africa and infected a handful of Americans who have traveled to that region.

The hospital said it is complying with all recommendations from the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention and the Texas Department of Health to ensure the safety of other patients and medical staff.

 

This comment appeared in entry 'Ebola' on 09/30/14, 12:59 AM. (go to entry to post a reply)

DanielS wrote:

It’s time to get past this modernist pathology of something being considered unimportant or insignificant if it is not perfectly new. That is the strange loop of modernity: “This is not new - work to change - celebrate change - this no longer new - set about to change..”..on and on it goes.

As far as I know, Salter clarified and extended notions of E.G.I. that E.O. Wilson had put forth. I remember Wilson talking about the introduction of one sub-Saharan African into European culture being equivalent to x amount (more than one) death of a European child. Salter calculated that it is actually much worse, in fact exponentially worse in terms of E.G.I.

Particularly as it is operationally verifiable, this provides powerful warrant to defend prejudices and racial discrimination.

It could correspond to a powerful warrant for White men to asset in their defense - that miscegenating White women can have equivalence to rapists and pedophiles in terms of destruction of E.G.I. and destruction of social capital.

This comment appeared in entry 'Salter: Accept that the State is no longer ours and rebuild radically of our people' on 09/29/14, 08:29 AM. (go to entry to post a reply)

DanielS wrote:

Leon Haller’s modus operandi is devised to provide an inroad for Jews.

When are you leaving Haller?

This comment appeared in entry 'Jewish Control of the British Empire, Divide and Conquer, Comandeering European War efforts' on 09/29/14, 06:54 AM. (go to entry to post a reply)

Leon Haller wrote:

Western Civ is dying because it has abdicated the Racial Principle - that race is meaningful; that race is the foundation of particular civilizations; that the white race is the foundation of Western Civ; that for races to endure they must be kept mostly separate, especially genetically, but also geographically; and that the greatest threat to the survival of the West is public acceptance of the presence (as well as the reality of that presence) of nonwhites on European soil.

Europeans have been interbreeding for centuries. Most white Americans are of mixed European ethnicity, but that in itself has not resulted in any civilizational decay. The future of Europe will see ever more intra-European ethnic mixing. That is fine. The problem occurs with miscegenation, as well as the cultural pollution engendered by the presence of nonwhites integrated into white societies.

RACE is the issue for any real nationalist. Nonwhites must be removed from European soils. After that, nationalists can break up into other ideological formations.

This comment appeared in entry 'Jewish Control of the British Empire, Divide and Conquer, Comandeering European War efforts' on 09/29/14, 06:12 AM. (go to entry to post a reply)

DanielS wrote:

If a tree falls in the woods and there is nobody there to hear it, does it make a noise?

At first it seems obvious that the answer is yes; but when one considers the “no” answer, one finds provocative implications - that it may as well not make a noise as far as we are concerned, if there were never any people there to hear it and determine how it counts.

Thus, whether or not gender is socially constructed is a philosophical question; and treating it as a social construction is correctly meant to undo the Cartesian separation and its destructive consequences.

Social constructionism has been distorted, perverted really, by Jewish academics, to a Cartesianism in the other direction - that is to say that you can virtually make anything out of events that you fancy and imagine. That is not social constructionism proper, which, being non-Cartesian, must respect facts but engage them in an ongoing hermeneutic process of interactive feedback between fact, individual and how these count for other people.

As Jews manipulate how these facts count for other people, we may be tempted to fixate on mere “facts”, become scientistic and Cartesian in our individual assertion, attempting pure separation from the verification of others.

Nevertheless, you can tell if you are being subject to the false, Jewish “social constructionism”, if you have to enter the word “mere” before the term social constructionism in order to make sense of their assertion that some event or entity is a mere imaginative creation. However, in that “mere” is the Cartesian divide that renders it not social constructionism at all.

This comment appeared in entry 'Human protandry: showing that sex roles are not "socially constructed"' on 09/28/14, 10:41 PM. (go to entry to post a reply)

Noachideous wrote:

There is substantial evidence in the occult that the two world wars were fought for the creation of this ‘israel’ monstrosity in 1948…..  Search Rav Ashlag and Kabbalah Secrets for the text.

It is not by accident that in the time domain, WW2 takes the form of a temple menorah, with three years either side of the central year 1942….. 42 being the number of the deity the jew feels has chosen the ‘jew’.

The implication being that the ‘allies’, being predominantly anglokelt in origin were deceived into the subjugation of the german who was bullied into taking a defensive position that was construed as the opposite.

Also a Piper here Jimmy, I and on behalf of others if they knew,  request that you remove the israel piper link as it is seen here as an affront to my people, Kelts and Anglo Saxons who died in contrived wars for the benefit of jews and their ‘israel’ monstrosity. The 6 million number is derived of jewish numerology and its forensic verification is not permitted. Those that demand it incarcerated in some countries.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KZKzUbIjr30

It would be entirely rational and logical to demand the exclusion of those who comprise the jewish establishment, particularly members of the Bnai Brith, from the gentile war memorials…..

Their presence as a coterie of mendacious liars and deceivers and defiles these places.

This comment appeared in entry 'Jimmy Marr Takes The Social Constructionist Turn' on 09/28/14, 05:46 PM. (go to entry to post a reply)

. wrote:

Are you sure they really liked dressing or doing what their gender was supposed to or they did it to conform. Or maybe just like many other kids their interest changed as they got older.

This comment appeared in entry 'Human protandry: showing that sex roles are not "socially constructed"' on 09/28/14, 04:50 PM. (go to entry to post a reply)

TrollWatch wrote:

JamesUK,

I believe that you understand that Leon is not on-page here and that you want to encourage him in his efforts to derail and divert MR’s direction. I.e., you should talk to him elsewhere and not encourage him here. But asking trolls to politely go elsewhere is pointless, isn’t it?

This comment appeared in entry 'Jewish Control of the British Empire, Divide and Conquer, Comandeering European War efforts' on 09/28/14, 02:59 PM. (go to entry to post a reply)

jamesUK wrote:

@Leon Haller

How can the issue be about race when most of the immigration into EU countries is internal economic migration mostly from new Eastern European EU countries?

The greatest determent would seem to be conflicts between European countries themselves, EU economic issues and failing native birth rates among the native EU/Western countries themselves.

This comment appeared in entry 'Jewish Control of the British Empire, Divide and Conquer, Comandeering European War efforts' on 09/28/14, 02:31 PM. (go to entry to post a reply)

Rotherham mother wrote:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=i1OjMjmIYCg

Mother of child abuse victim speaking in Rotherham

This comment appeared in entry 'Sir Gerald Howarth stands by letter: Time for England to fight back' on 09/28/14, 02:37 AM. (go to entry to post a reply)

Guest Blogger wrote:

...a good occasion to take the trouble to remind people that nobody around had anything to do with World War II in any case.

This comment appeared in entry 'Jimmy Marr Takes The Social Constructionist Turn' on 09/27/14, 11:50 PM. (go to entry to post a reply)

Jimmy Marr wrote:

Can a bagpipe fit inside a kangaroohide musette bag?

I’d be very surprised if it could be so fitted, and even if it could, I wouldn’t do it. I have four sets of bagpipes and none of them are in bags or cases of any sort. On the rare occasions when I do use a bag, it’s to prop up a sign rather than carry the instrument.

Disassembly of pipes, particularly drone segments, necessitates re-tuning, which I prefer to avoid. On some occasions, however, the extra effort is well worth the trouble:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xDrDdFyr13k

 

This comment appeared in entry 'Jimmy Marr Takes The Social Constructionist Turn' on 09/27/14, 03:59 PM. (go to entry to post a reply)

melba peachtoast wrote:

Yes but we are all wondering how you transport that intricate instrument. Can a bagpipe fit inside a kangaroohide musette bag?

This comment appeared in entry 'Jimmy Marr Takes The Social Constructionist Turn' on 09/27/14, 07:46 AM. (go to entry to post a reply)

Guest Blogger wrote:

http://www.kbtx.com/home/headlines/Brenham-Man-Pleads-Guilty-To-Murder-Of-Ex-Girlfriend-Sentenced-To-Life-276934571.html

BRENHAM - A Brenham man will spend the rest of his life in prison after pleading guilty to the murder of his girlfriend.

Anthony Wayne Burns, 44, shot Rachelle Nowak in February. Nowak was at the home of an elderly lady she cared for when Burns broke through the front door, chased Nowak to a back room and shot her multiple times. Burns told police he was mad because Nowak would not answer his phone calls.

This comment appeared in entry 'WHITE WOMEN FOR SALE!' on 09/27/14, 06:05 AM. (go to entry to post a reply)

GenoType wrote:

Quite a few years ago I and others spent a great deal time and effort articulating - here on MR - what is now presented as ‘state of the art’.

Funny, isn’t it?

Every few months I make a grand tour of the “red-pilling Dissident Right/Alt-Right/Dark Enlightenment” and am amused by what I read:

1.  Autonomous communities. Robotics. Water power.  Suburban “farming.” Alt-currencies.
2.  Plutocrats, oligarchy, speculators, and socialized risk named as sources of the problem.
3.  Government relegated to administrators/enforcers for the oligarchs.
4.  Statements made of “money loaned into existence.”
5.  Talk of “high-tech Amish or Mennonite” communities.  “Let a thousand Oranias bloom.”
6.  Populism, anti-globalism.
7.  A decidedly non-libertarian, if not anti-libertarian outlook.
8.  Secession/reconquest.

From writers and commentators; there’s a handful over Taki’s, of all places!

To give the Bowery Boy his due, I’ve seen his concept of “virulence” discussed.  No attribution, of course, but a genuine white patriot does not give a damn about that kind of thing.

I think it’s wonderful.  Better late than never.

 

 

 

This comment appeared in entry 'Salter: Accept that the State is no longer ours and rebuild radically of our people' on 09/26/14, 09:20 PM. (go to entry to post a reply)

katana wrote:

The Red Ice interview with Frank Salter is worth a listen to.

I like the guy as he comes across as a very thoughtful, honest and sincere person. That said, he also comes across as someone who hasn’t quite figured it all out and is groping around in the dark. His halting manner of speaking on the topic reflects that.

By that I mean his whole analysis lacks a cause or agency, it lacks a center, a core motive power pushing for what is going on in the mass import of the third world into our countries. Sure he mentions Boas, the takeover of our universities, our media and our government by brainwashed adherents of an ideology that is out to destroy us. He does all that yet fails to mention or hint at the elephant in the room, aka, the jews.

Why doesn’t he?

I suspect because he is genuinely in the thrall of the “Holocaust” story. He’s a believer in the jew yarns and therefore dare not take his analysis to its obvious direction and conclusion, aka, that jewish supremacists are behind the wholesale subversion and destruction of our societies.

There’s also the practical consideration of a need to earn a living as a consultant. But I don’t think this is his primary motivation, as he sounds like a decent person interested in the truth.
—————————

My latest blog post, The Case for Germany – Part 6, is here: KATANA

[http://katana17.wordpress.com]

This comment appeared in entry 'Salter: Accept that the State is no longer ours and rebuild radically of our people' on 09/26/14, 10:16 AM. (go to entry to post a reply)

DanielS wrote:

Note the “Gates of Vienna” type of perspective trolled by L.H.

This comment appeared in entry 'Jewish Control of the British Empire, Divide and Conquer, Comandeering European War efforts' on 09/26/14, 08:49 AM. (go to entry to post a reply)

Leon Haller wrote:

Who cares about Polish plumbers? The issue is Muslim terrorist and rapists. The issue is RACE.

This comment appeared in entry 'Jewish Control of the British Empire, Divide and Conquer, Comandeering European War efforts' on 09/26/14, 07:50 AM. (go to entry to post a reply)

Leon Haller wrote:

The only answers are education in racial realities, and then, first, self/familial/communal segregation, followed by eventual secession and sovereignty. There is no other possibility. I call this “White Zion” (WN ingathering with an ultimate goal of sovereign electoral conquest).

This comment appeared in entry 'Salter: Accept that the State is no longer ours and rebuild radically of our people' on 09/26/14, 07:48 AM. (go to entry to post a reply)

Jimmy Marr wrote:

* Note that there is a distinction to be drawn between what IS, ontologically speaking, and how those facts come to count or be valued, as implied in this sentence:

“that it will be left to us to create what is important to value”

There is a distinction, but it’s possible that the distinction is merely an unintended side-effect of language, which happens to be our only means of communicating it.

If we think of objectivity as a side effect of syntax, the profoundest truth derivable from it, or describable by it, will be the artificiality of its initial premise, the subject/object differentiation that we humans placed there for our own convenience in the first place.

Gods “R” us*.


*Leon Haller excluded.


https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oVoCKLyt2uw

 

 

 

This comment appeared in entry 'Jimmy Marr Takes The Social Constructionist Turn' on 09/26/14, 05:00 AM. (go to entry to post a reply)

Guest Blogger wrote:

Remembering Martin Heidegger:
September 26, 1889–May 26, 1976
by Greg Johnson


1,540 words

Martin Heidegger is one of the giants of twentieth-century philosophy, both in terms of the depth and originality of his ideas and the breadth of his influence in philosophy, theology, the human sciences, and culture in general.

Heidegger was born on September 26, 1889, in the town of Meßkirch in the district of Sigmaringen in Baden-Württemberg, Germany. He died on May 26, 1976 in Freiburg and was buried in Meßkirch.

Heidegger was from a lower-class Catholic family. His family was too poor to send him to university, so he enrolled in a Jesuit seminary. But Heidegger was soon rejected by the Jesuits due to a heart condition. He then studied theology at the University of Freiburg from 1909–1911, after which time he switched his focus to philosophy. Eventually Heidegger broke entirely with Christianity.

In 1914 Heidegger defended his doctoral dissertation. In 1916, he defended his habilitation dissertation, which entitled him to teach in a German university. During the First World War, Heidegger was spared front duty because of his heart condition.

From 1919 to 1923, Heidegger was the salaried research assistant of Edmund Husserl at the University of Freiburg. Husserl, who was a Jewish convert to Lutheranism, was the founder of the phenomenological movement in German philosophy, and Heidegger was to become his most illustrious student.

In 1923, Heidegger was appointed assistant professor of philosophy at the University of Marburg. There his intense and penetrating engagement with the history of philosophy quickly became known throughout Europe, and students flocked to his lectures, including Hans-Georg Gadamer, who became Heidegger’s most eminent student, as well as such Jewish thinkers as Leo Strauss, Hannah Arendt, and Hans Jonas. In 1927, Heidegger published his magnum opus, Being and Time, the foundation of his world-wide fame. In 1928, Husserl retired from the University of Freiburg, and Heidegger returned to replace him, remaining in Freiburg for the rest of his academic career.

Heidegger was elected rector of the University of Freiburg on April 21, 1933. Heidegger joined the ruling National Socialist German Workers Party on May 1, 1933. In his inaugural address as rector on May 27, 1933, and in political speeches and articles from the same period, he expressed his support for the NSDAP and Adolf Hitler. Heidegger resigned as rector in April 1934, but he remained a member of the NSDAP until 1945. After the Second World War, the French occupation authorities banned Heidegger from teaching. In 1949, he was officially “de-Nazified” without penalty. He began teaching again in the 1950–51 academic year. He continued to teach until 1967.

A whole academic industry has grown up around the question of Heidegger and National Socialism. It truly is an embarrassment to the post-WW II intellectual consensus that arguably the greatest philosopher of the twentieth century was a National Socialist. But the truth is that Heidegger was never a particularly good National Socialist.

Yes, Heidegger belonged intellectually to the “Conservative Revolutionary” milieu. Yes, he thought that the NSDAP was the best political option available for Germany. But Heidegger’s view of the meaning of National Socialism was rather unorthodox.


Heidegger viewed the National Socialist revolution as the self-assertion of a historically-defined people, the Germans, who wished to regain control of their destiny from an emerging global-technological-materialistic system represented by both Soviet communism and Anglo-Saxon capitalism. This revolt against leveling, homogenizing globalism was, in Heidegger’s words, “the inner truth and greatness” of National Socialism. From this point of view, the NSDAP’s biological racism and anti-Semitism seemed to be not only philosophically naive and superficial but also political distractions.

Heidegger knew that Jews were not Germans, and that Jews were major promoters of the system he rejected. He was glad to see their power broken, but he also had cordial relationships with many Jewish students, including extramarital affairs with Hannah Arendt and Elisabeth Blochmann (who was half-Jewish).

In the end, Heidegger believed that the Third Reich failed to free itself and Europe from the pincers of Soviet and Anglo-Saxon materialism. The necessities of re-armament and war forced a rapprochement with big business and heavy industry, thus Germany fell into the trammels of global technological materialism even as she tried to resist it.

Read Greg Johnson’s full article at Counter-Currents
http://www.counter-currents.com/2014/09/remembering-martin-heidegger-4/

Ultimately, Heidegger’s philosophy — particularly his account of human being in time, his fundamental ontology, his account of the history of the West, and his critique of modernity and technology — is of greater significance…..than his connection with National Socialism. It is a measure of the embryonic nature of our movement that we just beginning to deal with his work.

This comment appeared in entry 'Yes, The White Race IS ..A Social Construct (Contrary To Jewish And Right-Wing Denial)' on 09/26/14, 03:38 AM. (go to entry to post a reply)

Guest Blogger wrote:

GREENFORD, Ohio – Former Ohio Congressman Jim Traficant was hospitalized after he was hurt in a tractor accident in Greenford Tuesday.

His wife said it happened at Traficant’s daughter’s home and that it was not uncommon for him to do farm work.

She described his condition at a Youngstown hospital as “very critical.”


Traficant -

A rare Congressman with the integrity to speak-out against the Israeli lobby.

This comment appeared in entry 'EDGAR STEELE FRAMED, RAILROADED, DIES IN ZOG PRISON' on 09/26/14, 02:50 AM. (go to entry to post a reply)

Guest Blogger wrote:

* Note that there is a distinction to be drawn between what IS, ontologically speaking, and how those facts come to count or be valued, as implied in this sentence:

“that it will be left to us to create what is important to value”

This comment appeared in entry 'Jimmy Marr Takes The Social Constructionist Turn' on 09/26/14, 02:39 AM. (go to entry to post a reply)

Page 1 of 3468 pages  1 2 3 >  Last ›