Comments posted

Page 1 of 3499 pages  1 2 3 >  Last ›

Vlad Impaler vs. homogEU wrote:

Vasile Lupasc discusses his Romanian historical perspective, from Dracula’s brilliant military tactics to the commercial homogenization of Europe’s once fascinating variety of national/cultural differences.

http://www.redicecreations.com/radio/2015/03/RIR-150325.php

This comment appeared in entry 'NATIONALIST RENAISSANCE' on 03/27/15, 05:37 AM. (go to entry to post a reply)

James Bowery wrote:

Google is pursuing a massive, world-girdling, balloon-based mesh network infrastructure with many of the characteristics I described in the above post here at MR in early 2007.

This comment appeared in entry 'Postcivil Society: Empty the Cities' on 03/26/15, 05:21 PM. (go to entry to post a reply)

James Bowery wrote:

My 1978 gray-code solution to the Tower of Hanoi problem was actually deemed worthy of publication by an academic journal (Information Processing Letters):

Buneman, Peter, and Leon Levy. “The towers of Hanoi problem.” Information Processing Letters 10.4 (1980): 243-244.

This problem may have been worthy of no more than a high school computer programming assignment but if so it is interesting that it got Buneman and Levy even a minor place in computer science history.

This comment appeared in entry 'Displaced Programmer Support for Ron Paul' on 03/26/15, 04:58 PM. (go to entry to post a reply)

Open letter to Max Hastings wrote:

Open letter to Sir Max Hastings:

Dear Max Hastings,

I am writing you from the nationalist site, “Majority Rights.”

It started out as a free discussion site and thus entertained a variety of arguments, some highly stigmatic.

Over the past few years I have taken its general direction from free discussion to a platform which essentially represents the interests of native Europeans and Native European nationalists.

With that, our platform rejects Hitler and Nazism of necessity and by definition.

Nor will it be beholden to religion.

Further, it treats Jewish people as non-European, thus not in our interest group. Perhaps controversially, we are critical of them, seeing them as over represented in 7 societal power points; and will speak irreverently of them in order to make it clear to Nazi types, that they do not have a corner on not wanting to be beholden to Jewish influence.

Nevertheless, though we do look upon Jews as a largely hostile influence to European interests, we are not a single cause site. Nor are we supremacists. Rather, we take a separatist and universal nationalist position.

We seek sovereignty, not killing.

Majority Rights is carving out a niche, one might say, for sane nationalists.

On the other hand, Hitler idolatry has become a kind of strange politically correct litmus test among popular “White Nationalist” web sites.

Needless to say (to you) I believe this is a catastrophic association for a movement - for White = European people and their National boundaries - which does not, or should not, be represented by what is in fact the imperialism and supremacism of the kind Hitler had in mind.

Our site has even become less popular for this editorial stance against Hitler.

The same litmus test among WN which maintains Hitler idolatry comes with an outright vilification of Churchill.

Part of why this has happened, I surmise, is because “White” Americans are far and away German(ic) and secondly Irish. Thus, with America in decline and plausible arguments that Jews are a prime cause (e.g., https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7nBzJdQB5r4), Hitler gains more currency as his views circulate untroubled by those Americans of European descent demographics not highly represented in America, whose interests were in conflict with Hitler’s aspirations.

With that, it has become the agenda of many WN to vindicate Hitler as “the good guy” even, to argue that The US was on “the wrong side of the war.”

Some hope to “disprove” the holocaust.

(we recently spoke with Dr. Christian Lindtner for his expertise in debunking holocaust deniers).

The same White Nationalist culture has taken to vilifying Churchill for his Jewish ties and for opposing Hitler.

Thus, we come to my reasons for seeking an interview with you.

Between your film, “The Necessary War” and your latest book on Churchill, you have purveyed crucial information to balance this distorted perspective of White Nationalism.

Particularly helpful to argument is your discussion of “Operation Unthinkable” - especially because you are critical of it as highly impractical, it seems to show that Churchill was not a mere cynical pragmatist who merely sold-out Poland to the Soviets.

By contrast, it is a frequent contention of WN that Churchill’s whole “ostensible” reason for declaring war in defense of Poland was belied by his sheer willingness to let them fall under Soviet control.

Next, WN typically argue that Churchill was put up to war solely by his Jewish ties and sponsors.

I consider that perhaps Churchill thought he was availing himself of Jewish help in taking on a rogue Nazi regime - that the Nazis actually were a bad regime (believe it or not, that is unthinkable in popular WN) and wanting to reign supreme over hitherto free nations.

There was a discussion just the other day between two well known “White” activists, both PhD certified, in which they acknowledged that Churchill cited the Jewish role behind communism (and that goes against the claim that Churchill was a thorough philoSemite), but that he saw Zionism as an option for decent Jews.

It is apparent that something like Israel, if not Israel, then some place for a Jewish nation, would be the ethical nationalist position - and a position that Churchill may have been assimilating. There may have been Judeo-Christian reasoning to this as well, seeing Israel as the Jews’ destiny and so on.

In fact, the Balfour Declaration for British help in reclaiming Israel in exchange for Jewish help in getting The US into World War I is cited by WN as Jewish control instead of perhaps what was perceived (perhaps mis-perceived) an equitable nationalist deal for “Jewish help.”

To prominent WN, the Balfour Declaration is “proof” that the only motivation to go against Germany in World War One was in Jewish interests.

That argument is rebutted, among other examples, by yours and Sir Hugh Strachan’s discussion of the atrocities committed by the Kaiser’s army in Belgium.

If we could discuss these matters with you it could bring crucial balance on these issues and put a desperate lot on a better course.

There is another article of faith in WN that your film brought into focus as being off-the-mark.

Versailles is invariably taken as having been entirely unfair to The Germans and Hitler perfectly within reason to overcompensate in response.

I observe only four cities on the Polish border that Germany might have found hard to relinquish, but did not merit a renewed world war: Poznan was justifiably returned to Poland. The Versailles committee making Danzig neutral again seems fairly reasonable given the context and history. Bromberg and Thorn made logistical sense to give to Poland so as not to extrude so far into Poland and its sea access.

Not entirely unreasonable.

Moreover, Poland had already demonstrated staunch resolve to resist Soviet invasion, thus rebutting another Nazi argument, that they needed to invade Eastward in order to pre-empt a Soviet advance.

The Sudetenland is more difficult to argue and that is where I need even more help from you.

Again, of course, it is assumed that Hitler was entirely within reason to demand it as part of Germany.

So, I ask, why did Versailles give The Sudetenland to Czech?

Was it a territorial buffering and penalty for a war seen as having been caused by Germany?

Was it compensation for The 30 Years War’s devastation of the Czech population?

A few other questions emerge as result of your discussions with Margaret MacMillan -

More controversial still, but raising what seem to be legitimate red flags from a “WN” perspective…

..as evidence that a German victory would have been generally negative for Europe, she provides an example of Kaiser Germany having been very “hard on the Bolsheviks.”

Was that bad? Wasn’t it maybe they who needed still harder treatment?

She provides another scenario in which Versailles might have done better to be even harder on Germany by breaking it up, perhaps even into regional fiefdoms. Indeed, that may have prevented a World War (no small matter) but what would prevent these small and relatively powerless fiefdoms from being taken advantage of by Jewish interests and Neo Liberal internationalism to the detriment of Europe as we are now experiencing? - such as with Sweden being on the brink -

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UHsXWYaTlik

There probably is some overcompensation on the part of Jewish interests and Neo Liberals in response to the war, but evidence points to a longer evolutionary pattern of antagonism to native European interests -

e.g., https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Ip08PzkWO4s

- moving through stages of naivete, to disingenuousness, to overcompensating, inaccurate, counter-productive response.

Do you see the possibility that this pattern is not an illusion and if it is real, as it seems to be, the possibility to discuss what we might do about it with the help of an accurate and sane reading of European history?

R.S.V.P.

This comment appeared in entry 'Majority Radio: Dr Christian Lindtner speaks to DanielS and GW' on 03/26/15, 11:38 AM. (go to entry to post a reply)

Faurison's "method for clarity" wrote:

On today’s (March 26th, second hour) Stormfront Radio show, Don Advo said that he was deeply moved by an Institute of Historical Review* conference where he met Robert Faurison.

Faurison spoke of his “method for getting clarity”, which was to first translate something from German to French then to Latin, then to English, then back to French.

Don Advo thinks this is great.

“A statue should be erected for Faurison for his concern for truth.”

As for this “method” of gaining clarity, it seems reminiscent of the old “telephone” game, wherein information gets lost with each transmission until the original message is completely altered by time of the last transmission.

Or, in the case of Faurison, perhaps it is more like a card trick, distracting people with focus on his language and other academic skills.


* Metzger calls it “The Institute of Hysterical Review”

This comment appeared in entry 'Majority Radio: Dr Christian Lindtner speaks to DanielS and GW' on 03/26/15, 10:18 AM. (go to entry to post a reply)

Le Pen plans to pull France out of EU wrote:

http://www.euractiv.com/sections/elections/following-cameron-marine-le-pen-pledges-eu-exit-referendum-313229.


“Marine Le Pen, the head of France’s far-right National Front party, has said she will ask the French people to vote on pulling out of the EU if she is elected president in 2017.

‘My idea is to tell the French people that if they elect me,” in 2017, “six months later there will be a referendum,’ Marine Le Pen told Greek TV channel Mega.”

This comment appeared in entry 'Ancient and modern – Part 2' on 03/26/15, 02:17 AM. (go to entry to post a reply)

Zarathustra's eloquence wrote:


Why is it, also, that Nietzsche’s poetic fancies are so inspiring as philosophy?

Indeed, I can only imagine how his writing must come across in German. Zarathustra (for example) reads beautifully, even in English. Questions are asked and give birth to answers in a continuous burgeoning flow that deftly facilitates transcendence of prior thought structures. That’s not meant as anything like a comprehensive endorsement of his philosophy, but the literary aspect is neat stuff.

 

This comment appeared in entry 'Ancient and modern – Part 2' on 03/26/15, 02:07 AM. (go to entry to post a reply)

Per Nordin wrote:

We’re doing something: I am sorry, I apologize, I misunderstood your post. Thank you for your post I agree. Will take and read the link.

Daniel: I’ll try to get back to you shortly and answer your long letter, is a little stressed so just write a little shorter here first.

Carolyn: In your post 29, you wrote:

“P.S. As to police actions in the east, those are not denied and never have been. Of course Jews were killed and executed for carrying out sabotage against the Wehrmacht and SS battalions, their support services, German infrastructure, and for hideous atrocities committed on captured German troops. Many of these Jews were too dangerous to be kept alive even in concentration camps; it took more personnel than was available to watch over such crafty characters, which included women and children..”


So you do not deny that the german police had the task of killing even jewish women and children?

You are not denying for example,  such mass shootings of jewish women and children at Mizocz Ghetto ?: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mizocz_Ghetto


Do I understand you correctly?

This comment appeared in entry 'Majority Radio: Dr Christian Lindtner speaks to DanielS and GW' on 03/25/15, 06:22 PM. (go to entry to post a reply)

We're doing something wrote:

Posted by Per Nordin on March 25, 2015, 02:16 PM | #

“Sweden headed over a cliff”: Are you asking if I am doing something about it?


No. I know that you are doing something about it and am wanting to join your cause most fervently.


Who said I was not doing anything about it?

Maybe Carolyn, or some other stupid right-winger, but certainly not I.


I have done something about it since the 90’s.

Excellent!

But I can not turn the ship alone.

My point exactly. We are here to help you. Lets turn this together, as it is a strenuous task turning the big gear. The heavy gear that is tough and very fundamental to turn.

But fortunately the national resistance is increasing in Sweden every year.

Good. We are with them.

Unfortunately our enemies mobilize as never before and are doing everything they can to destroy the Swedish nation and our folk and race.

I know.

How this will end is impossible to say.

Join us in organizing separatism (as opposed to the usual right wing crap) and it will end in victory.

Anyway I do my duty to my people and my race, I do what I can. Are you doing your duty anonymous?

Sorry for being cryptic, Per.

Would you tell me what you think of this?:

http://majorityrights.com/weblog/comments/euro_dna_nation

The version on Kelso’s site might be a bit better because I was able to edit that version whereas the MR version was put up before I had editing privileges….

Here is the version on Kelso’s “White News Now”

http://www.whitenewsnow.com/lounge-white-patriots/32824-euro-d-n-nation.html

MacDonald edited one version (and liked it), but it has not come to fruition yet..

I’m excited at the prospect of his speaking to GW and I before long about it..

This comment appeared in entry 'Majority Radio: Dr Christian Lindtner speaks to DanielS and GW' on 03/25/15, 03:23 PM. (go to entry to post a reply)

Per Nordin wrote:

“Sweden headed over a cliff”: Are you asking if I am doing something about it? Who said I was not doing anything about it? I have done something about it since the 90’s. But I can not turn the ship alone. But fortunately the national resistance is increasing in Sweden every year. Unfortunately our enemies mobilize as never before and are doing everything they can to destroy the Swedish nation and our folk and race. How this will end is impossible to say. Anyway I do my duty to my people and my race, I do what I can.

Are you doing your duty anonymous?

This comment appeared in entry 'Majority Radio: Dr Christian Lindtner speaks to DanielS and GW' on 03/25/15, 02:16 PM. (go to entry to post a reply)

Sweden on the brink wrote:

“Sweden headed over a cliff”


https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UHsXWYaTlik


Let’s do something about it Per!

This comment appeared in entry 'Majority Radio: Dr Christian Lindtner speaks to DanielS and GW' on 03/25/15, 05:42 AM. (go to entry to post a reply)

Per Nordin wrote:

Carolyn Yeager:  “I was going to say earlier that defeatists like Per Nordin and DanielS would have been put into detention work camps in National Socialist Germany. That’s the real issue with all you weak guys.”

In what way am I defeatist do you mean?

And this is not defeatism?:

Carolyn Yeager posts 55: “I have no plan on how to rid White homelands of Jews and non-Whites. I never said I did. I leave that to the men. I think that as things stand now, it’s near impossible.”

“Near impossible” and you call me and others defeatists ???

Carolyn Yeager : “That’s the real issue with all you weak guys.”

Excuse me, but how can you make such judgments about me and others that you do not know? As you have not even met? How can you judge whether I am “weak” ?

And about the detention work camps in National Socialist Germany, if Hitler were alive today, I believe it would rather be those of your ideologically like-minded he had sent to the camps, who dishonor his memory by his mere appearance, looks and behavior:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NHxBKMUlEjg

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vlR9FtW3Yok

Also with their shaved heads and tattoos, they would qualify nicely in Hitlers concentration camps.

Carolyn Yeager : “I cannot take anyone here seriously. I only commented to correct major stupid statements. But getting involved in time-wasting “debates” which only generate more and more stupid statements to correct is not at all in my interest.”

And I can not take you seriously that require answers from others but refuses to answer simple questions.

Carolyn Yeager :“It comes from your sexual orientation, and maybe Christian Lindtner’s does too.”

Really? Seriously?  Again, how do you think that you can know things about people you do not know? And what does sexuality have to do with this matter? You now sound like the jew Sigmund Freud.

This comment appeared in entry 'Majority Radio: Dr Christian Lindtner speaks to DanielS and GW' on 03/24/15, 01:23 PM. (go to entry to post a reply)

DanielS wrote:

Another reason for mentioning that is because defending hippies and the context of their seeking the basic levels of Actualization as opposed to Feminists (like Yeager was/is), who sought the top of its “hierarchy”, and the Jewish (and right wing) misconstrual of the hippieis is just one of the original ideas that Yeager says that I don’t have.

This comment appeared in entry 'Trout Mask Replica' on 03/24/15, 09:25 AM. (go to entry to post a reply)

origin Dasein for hippies wrote:

Another reason for mentioning that is because defending hippies and the context of their seeikng the basic levels of Actualization as opposed to Feminists (like Yeager was/is), who sought the top of its “hierarchy”, and the Jewish (and right wing) misconstrual of the hippieis is just one of the original ideas that Yeager says that I don’t have

 

This comment appeared in entry 'Trout Mask Replica' on 03/24/15, 09:24 AM. (go to entry to post a reply)

DanielS wrote:

In case anybody is wondering about this admittedly but deliberately strange post…

A little humor here for those who think we cannot move in and out of “pariah” mode with facility.

It is also to put it in the face of people who appear on Red Ice or White Voice and continue to blame hippies “for smokng pot and going to Woodstock”

But what can you expect of Angelo John Ganucci? Tony Robbins taught him all he needs to know.

And what can you expect in the way of empathy from feminists/feminazis?

“Hippies” were supposed to go to war out of sheer custom and habit of war (having nothing to do with defending our people).

They can’t be bothered to note that this movement was over when the Viet Nam war was over.

Coincidence? And should they have gone to Viet Nam instead of Woodstock?

Idiot.

This comment appeared in entry 'Trout Mask Replica' on 03/24/15, 03:40 AM. (go to entry to post a reply)

Greg and Metzger proposed wrote:

Posted by Greg Johnson on March 23, 2015, 02:42 PM | #

It was the policy of the British government to stoke Polish intransigence toward Germany

The Poles were intransigent? They could see what was coming.

For 123 years they told stories, longed and fought for their nation to return.

Not only were they willing to fight The Soviets, they had done so admrably - thwarting a Soviet advance that was headed for Berlin.

After less than 20 years of existence, Hitler threatened their return to existence out of his habit and view of tradition.

in order to spark a war,

Hitler wanted to spark the war.

giving the British a pretext for starting a Second World War.

Giving Hitler a pretext for starting a Second World War.

Greg. Are you kidding? You’ve read Mein Kampf.

War was a way of life for him.

Poland was Friedrich the Great’s Imperial Trophy ground.

Poland fought for 123 years to regain its nation and to Hitler (whose idol was F the Great) Poland’s very existence was anathema.

You’ve read Table Talk? Borders were held to be what could be imposed.

It hardly exculpates the British that they later momentarily considered fighting the USSR over Poland’s devastated remains.

It makes a big difference.

And, they were only temporarily devastated by Hitler’s asshole campaign.

Greg. Man. I am not against you. Don’t you understand? I mean, these guys were into burning libraries.

I’m/we’re not against you, not against Germans, nationalists.

I totally understand what hell it is to be a White man in America. It is absolutely unbearable. It is torture. It is hell. This is no joke.

If I were a German American, well, I probably would not want to be bothered with the views of those who got in the way of Hitler’s plans. I probably would be talking the same way as you guys.

Do you see? I am not claiming to be above it.

But I would be mistaken.

The Easterner’s really are not so different from the Germanics and Westerners.

These are not people you want to fight and who want to fight you.

Metzger says it well: when Hitler came into Czechoslovakia, he was surprised to see all these blonde children.

He didn’t travel enough. He did not know foreign lands well enough.

The same is true for Americans.

I know.

I went through this. The shocks of seeing what these countries were like by contrast to the pejorative stories told through American propaganda (I thought Russian women were ugly! Can you imagine?).

I was totally unprepared for this. I was still fighting fights that were irrelevant.

I don’t know if you have been to the east…but I can’t describe the shock I felt…when I saw places like Poland…like Russia (Petersburg)... I was told these places, these people were somehow bad?

Then you realize the power of propaganda.

Metzger altered his view when he saw satellite photos of the streets of Moscow. He did it and so can you. I know you don’t want to be told by me, but I am beside myself. What can I do? We are not against Germans and not above the kind of rage those among the rage of the Nazi regime experienced. I totally understand.

But there is a big problem in being a locked in diatribe between Jews and German (Americans).

I think a good conversation might be you, Metzger and I.

If you are open, maybe we should try for that..

I guess that he’d be willing.

This comment appeared in entry 'Majority Radio: Dr Christian Lindtner speaks to DanielS and GW' on 03/23/15, 03:31 PM. (go to entry to post a reply)

Greg Johnson wrote:

It was the policy of the British government to stoke Polish intransigence toward Germany in order to spark a war, giving the British a pretext for starting a Second World War. It hardly exculpates the British that they later momentarily considered fighting the USSR over Poland’s devastated remains.

This comment appeared in entry 'Majority Radio: Dr Christian Lindtner speaks to DanielS and GW' on 03/23/15, 02:42 PM. (go to entry to post a reply)

Balfour Declaration / Rape of Belgium wrote:

On The David Duke show of 23 March 2015 he cites “The Balfour Declaration”, which, as we all know, was a deal Britain made with organized Jewry to get them Palestine in exchange for getting The USA into the war.

Alright, war is a Jew harvest and their machinations behind war, to play both sides and benefit from its financing, playing their enemies off of one another and so on is not in question here.

However, there are two questions besides that which come to mind:

Therefore Kaiser Germany had to do what it did to Belgium, its structures, archives and civilians, French as well?

The second question would be, could some parts of The British establishment have said, “The Jews want Palestine? So what? give it to them if they can help get The US on our side.

Not saying that’s good, but it could be an understandable perspective at the time wherein giving Palestine to Jews may have seemed somewhere between trivial and a reasonable price to pay - or good, even; particularly depending upon how religious (Christian) they were, with all the scripture describing it as “the holy land, promised by God to the Jews”, it may have even seemed an honorable thing to do.

This comment appeared in entry '"The Necessary War" - a film by Max Hastings' on 03/23/15, 12:01 PM. (go to entry to post a reply)

293 and counting.. wrote:

This article has 293 comments (so far) at Morgoth’s

http://nwioqeqkdf.blogspot.com/2015/03/individualisms-wake-abyss-by-dr-graham.html#disqus_thread

This comment appeared in entry 'Individualism's Wake: The Abyss - some favorites of Dr. Lister' on 03/23/15, 11:42 AM. (go to entry to post a reply)

DanielS wrote:

Graham said in an email:

In the grand scheme of things it does not matter but that bit that I posted that someone reposted to the front psge is actually an lengthy quote from someone else. I just thought it too good not to share and chimes with my own views. Thought I better let you know!


I made the post misunderstanding it as having been written by Graham.

When this email from Graham was passed on to me, I changed the title from:

“Individualism’s Wake: The Abyss - by Graham Lister”

To

“Individualism’s Wake: The Abyss - some favorites of Dr. Lister.


At any rate, I thought its content too good and too timely to let go quietly over the comment horizon, even if only a compilation of well chosen quotes.

This comment appeared in entry 'The problem of the Establishment mentality – Part 1' on 03/23/15, 06:59 AM. (go to entry to post a reply)

canuck wrote:

Graham_Lister:

Is the comment #8 all your own theory, or have you interpolated comments from other sources (beyond the Aristotle reference)?

This comment appeared in entry 'The problem of the Establishment mentality – Part 1' on 03/23/15, 06:30 AM. (go to entry to post a reply)

Operation "Unthinkable" wrote:

Operation “Unthinkable”

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Operation_Unthinkable#cite_note-OpRep-1-4

The initial primary goal of the operation was declared as follows: “to impose upon Russia the will of the United States and the British Empire. Even though ‘the will’ of these two countries may be defined as no more than a square deal for Poland.


Max Hastings provides new perspective…

http://www.amazon.co.uk/Finest-Years-Churchill-Warlord-1940-45/dp/0007263686

He condemns as folly Churchill’s attempt to promote mass uprisings in occupied Europe, and details ‘Unthinkable’ – his amazing 1945 plan for an Allied offensive against the Russians to liberate Poland.


The fact that Hastings is critical of Churchill for this plan shows that Churchill was no mere pragmatist, just perfectly willing to sell-out Poland to the Soviets (contrary to what Colin Liddell and Greg Johnson assert), but did entertain and try to effect a principled concern for Poland’s national sovereignty despite its being enormously impractical. The Allies rejected the plan as they were vastly out-manned and out-equipped by the Soviet Army.

This comment appeared in entry 'Majority Radio: Dr Christian Lindtner speaks to DanielS and GW' on 03/23/15, 04:25 AM. (go to entry to post a reply)

Atlantic lets Muslims off hook wrote:

The Atlantic blames Whites for spikes in anti-Semitism in Europe (but not Muslim immigration)

http://www.radixjournal.com/blog/2015/3/18/is-it-time-for-the-jews-to-nuke-europe

This comment appeared in entry 'French Re-Revolution, C'est la Guerre!' on 03/23/15, 03:52 AM. (go to entry to post a reply)

tinkle little white dwarf star wrote:

To DS: So long Danny-boy. Wow, you really get pornographic! I’m copying what you just wrote as a classic. I don’t think you’re going to find a nice White girl to marry you when you have a mind like this.

Where is the pornography in what I said, Carolyn? His little thing with his niece is well known. Since you brought up the matter of looking under people’s beds, maybe you like this?

He could have picked up some extra cash in Dubai, perhaps you too..

Isn’t there some irony in a Hitler worshipper castigating others for having a mind which will never appeal to nice people when they rebuff the nasty little thing that is her “mind”?

This comment appeared in entry 'Majority Radio: Dr Christian Lindtner speaks to DanielS and GW' on 03/22/15, 06:45 PM. (go to entry to post a reply)

"Far Right" meets Putin wrote:

“European “far right’ groups meet with Putin

http://news.yahoo.com/european-far-meets-russia-pro-kremlin-forum-171138383.html;_ylt=AwrBJSBW.A5VQhgAjwfQtDMD


“Saint Petersburg (AFP) - Representatives of about a dozen far-right groups from across Europe gathered in Russia Sunday for a pro-Kremlin conference as concern grows over Moscow’s alleged attempts to court extremists on the continent.
Related Stories

European far-right politicians in Russia to support Putin Associated Press
 
Far-Right Flocks to Russia to Berate the West - Wall Street Journal)

EU links lifting Russia sanctions to peace in Ukraine - Associated Press

Putin describes meeting to take Crimea before referendum Associated Press

Putin says plan to take Crimea hatched before referendum - Reuters

About 150 members of Russian nationalist and right-wing European parties—including Greece’s Golden Dawn and Germany’s National Democratic Party—met in Russia’s second city Saint Petersburg to berate the West for its stance on the Ukraine conflict and to promote “traditional values”.

Far-rights groups across Europe have become vocal supporters of Russian President Vladimir Putin over his handling of the Ukraine crisis, prompting allegations they have reached a Faustian pact to help burnish the Kremlin’s battered image.

The growing ties come despite Moscow’s claims it is aiming to counter what it sees as “fascism” in Ukraine, where pro-Western protesters swept a Kremlin-backed president from power last year.

“We do not support the sanctions against Russia over the Ukraine conflict,” Udo Voigt, a member of the European Parliament from Germany’s National Democratic Party, told the conference.

“It is incredible what patience Russia and President Putin have shown in the face of NATO’s aggressive policies.”

Former head of the British National Party Nick

Former head of the British National Party Nick Griffin takes part in the International Russian Conse …

But the Russian federation of Jewish communities said it was extremely worried about such a meeting in “one of the cities that suffered most from the Nazis”, saying it was “particularly cynical” given Russia would celebrate the 70th anniversary of its victory over Adolf Hitler’s Germany in May.

Organisers said the forum was intended to strengthen links with right-wing groups across Europe and help shape a common agenda.

“This meeting is the first foundation stone towards constructing the new world that we are obliged to build,” said Fyodor Birukov, from the pro-Kremlin Rodina party that organised the event.

“I see this forum as a way pushing the fight back against liberalism and what we call modernism, the destruction of traditional values including Christianity throughout the modern world,” said Nick Griffin, former head of the British National Party.

- ‘Fascist friends’ -

“Russia is about tradition and Christianity and it’s very important that traditionalists from Russia, Europe and America get together to present our ideas more effectively to the general public.”

Sunday’s meeting also sparked condemnation from Russia’s liberal opposition, with several demonstrators outside the hotel venue holding placards reading “No to Nazis”.

Putin opponent Alexei Navalny, who was jailed last month for two weeks, wrote on Twitter: “The fascists have strangely and very quickly turned into Russia’s friends.”

“It is scandalous for Russia to welcome the heirs of Mussolini and Hitler,” one of the protesters outside the meeting, Natalia Gerasimova, 57, told AFP.

Fringe far-right groups from around Europe have sent observers to monitor votes by pro-Russian separatists in eastern Ukraine that sought to legitimise their rule despite widespread condemnation from Kiev and the West.

France’s National Front did not attend the meeting but its leader Marine Le Pen appeared on Russian state television on Saturday to condemn EU sanctions against Moscow and anti-Russian “propaganda”, which she claimed is being done “under orders from the US”.

This comment appeared in entry 'Majority Radio: Dr Christian Lindtner speaks to DanielS and GW' on 03/22/15, 04:51 PM. (go to entry to post a reply)

Graham_Lister wrote:

Oh dear Greg I just finished listening to your podcast with GW and Danny and I was thinking “well he seems relatively sane” (and I enjoyed the discussion of historicity - which I think is true of biological/complex systems in general. Populations of multicellular organisms, with discrete and differentiated tissues and organs, tend not to evolve to single cell life forms etc).

And then we have the silly Hitler worship. If he’s a great and successful ‘statesman’ Europeans and especially Germans don’t need enemies. I wonder what the hell an unsuccessful statesman looks like? If Adolf is the answer what’s the question? How to precipitate the deaths of millions of Europeans???

Folks might have noticed I don’t do religion and so I don’t do the ‘great men’ theory of politics or history. For one it’s psychologically infantile “oh Mr Big will come along ‘solve’ all of our problems”. That ascribing of some sort of politico-historic omnipotence to an individual is the state of mind very small and psychologically immature children have towards their parents. Adults should not entertain such notions. It has far too much of the echo of a messiah and some sort of eschatology. Ghastly nonsense. Secondly, history and historical change is a far more multifactorial and complex phenomenon than any ‘just-so’ story/notion of ‘great men’ historiography.

But I do recognise that debating someone’s theology - religious or political - is generally a waste of very precious time.

This comment appeared in entry 'Majority Radio: Dr Christian Lindtner speaks to DanielS and GW' on 03/22/15, 04:47 PM. (go to entry to post a reply)

Carolyn Yeager wrote:

“Carolyn, you go “personal” because you can’t argue. It was a mistake to try to take you seriously.” -Greg

Wrong. I am far more serious than you about this subject. You are playing around with demanding to be convinced by me when you have no intention of admitting to being convinced. At the same time,  you won’t educate yourself.

Most of these issues do come down to personal feelings about “How will this benefit me?” All you pseudo intellectuals pretend that you are completely objective; your personal life must be kept out of it. But the devil is in the details, right? - the personal details. You’re a White Nationalist because you’re White ... and you don’t like non-Whites with low IQ’s and lack of appreciation for White culture mucking up your world. You can accept that, why not the other?

I cannot take anyone here seriously. I only commented to correct major stupid statements. But getting involved in time-wasting “debates” which only generate more and more stupid statements to correct is not at all in my interest. So I am finished here for now. I am sorry if you felt my manner of argument was insensitive to you.

Do a word search on Hitler’s use of Vernichtung in all his speeches and writing, and you should get the idea.

To DS: So long Danny-boy. Wow, you really get pornographic! I’m copying what you just wrote as a classic. I don’t think you’re going to find a nice White girl to marry you when you have a mind like this.

This comment appeared in entry 'Majority Radio: Dr Christian Lindtner speaks to DanielS and GW' on 03/22/15, 03:51 PM. (go to entry to post a reply)

DanielS wrote:

Posted by Carolyn Yeager on March 22, 2015, 01:04 PM | #

“Carolyn, I don’t think that Hail offered a convincing argument.” GJ #85

Naturally, nothing would be since your mind is already made up, without reading a single serious revisionist text about it.

He asked you to point out those parts that you feel are supposed to be so convincing. You act like everyone has time to waste with your nonsense.

As everyone knows, you think you can argue any point of view, on anything, and win because of your (to your mind) brilliant debating skills.

He did win the debate Carolyn. Easily.

But your problem with Holocaust comes from something other than what you say it does. It comes from your sexual orientation,and maybe Christian Lindtner’s does too.

I believe regarding sexual orientation that Hitler said he was not looking under every bed.

You make a very big deal out of a marginal and limited phenomenon. Spreading accusations everywhere -

Dr. Lindtner? He has a son.

You seem to see queers everywhere.

Are you a carpet muncher Carolyn?

If 3 percent of the population, or whatever it is, goes that way, are discreet, go to their bars, don’t do with children…who gives a shit?

They can’t make me do it can they make you?

Haven’t you seen some of these people and doesn’t it strike you as obvious that some are highly genetically disposed to that?

And haven’t you known racist queers? I have. These people can help our side and are frequently motivated to do so.

I’m not saying their orientation should be encouraged or congratulated, but it is one issue that does not merit priority concern.

Don’t associate with them if you don’t like them. I don’t hang out with them and I don’t see them all around.

Is this getting too personal for Majority Rights?

Yes.

I only say it because it is the underlying reason for so much anti-Nazism.

Sure, everyone who doesn’t like the Nutzies is a queer. LOL!

For Greg and Counter-Currents, it’s alright to talk about the “Nazis”, that’s fine, good fun, but not to allow it to ever return. If more and more White people became convinced that the “Holocaust” did not happen at all, it might allow that taboo about “Nazis” to be broken. You can’t have that, can you?

You want to make what is true false and what is repugnant good.

I was going to say earlier that defeatists like Per Nordin and DanielS

I may be many things, but I am no defeatist.

Can’t speak for Per, but it sounds that he is seeking grounds for victory where yours has already failed utterly.

.....would have been put into detention work camps in National Socialist Germany. That’s the real issue with all you weak guys.

Ha ha ha! You sure are a good saleswomen! Oh boy, I want to bring back NS Germany so I can be put into a work camp….and what was it? half a sausage and half a loaf a bread and bowl of soup?

Are you a nigger lover, a Jew lover Carolyn? You like E1b1b1 AH don’t you?

And what about HItler’s little thing? Wouldn’t you like to be the one who tinkles on his face?

Why wouldn’t I want Hitler to be in charge after he discussed his plans for the Slavs?

Of course…sure, come to the east Hitler lovers…get comfortable…have a little dream…just don’t expect to wake up.

This comment appeared in entry 'Majority Radio: Dr Christian Lindtner speaks to DanielS and GW' on 03/22/15, 02:13 PM. (go to entry to post a reply)

Greg Johnson wrote:

Carolyn, you go “personal” because you can’t argue. It was a mistake to try to take you seriously.

This comment appeared in entry 'Majority Radio: Dr Christian Lindtner speaks to DanielS and GW' on 03/22/15, 01:49 PM. (go to entry to post a reply)

DanielS wrote:

This post was for Graham to answer, but I’d like to answer from my point of view as well:

Posted by Greg Johnson on March 22, 2015, 12:39 PM | #

Graham, I disagree regarding National Socialism and Fascism. They did not fail. They were destroyed by the Allies and international Jewry, who were threatened by them because they showed signs of being fantastic successes.

The nationalist and socialist aspects of NS, upon which its domestic success and whatever popularity it had was based was sold-out by Hitler who had imperialist aspirations all along.

This imperialistic ambition was entirely consistent with his thinking all along - not a provoked response, but bound to provoke a catastrophic response.

Graham and Franklin are right. It is not that “NS” didn’t have some good ideas going, but it had an underlying grounding in imperialist aggression and elitism with a pseudo justification of its being “natural” for human societies.

Hitler was not solely or even largely responsible for World War II. The British and the French started WWII.

He was more responsible than any single person.

The British warned him that they would go to war if he invaded Poland. He did anyway. And EVERYONE knows that he was not going to stop at his demands for the Versailles territory.

Hitler started a war with Poland, over German territories held captive by Poland.

These were not German territories Greg. They were territories decided by an entire world war, a war that said that they were no longer German or no longer exclusively German.

On the Polish border, there were only four cities of any size that Germany might dispute as having been taken away despite having German history or population.

Danzig was made neutral; probably as a concession to the fact that it had been bitterly disputed in history and had, at times, been Polish as well as neutral.

Anyway, it was the decision of an entire world war that it should be neutral. .

Poznan was the Poles’ ancient capital. It is true that the Germans held it for 123 years, and it was rather audacious for the Poles to take it back but it was righteous that they did, because it was a central Polish city that was stolen from them.

Bromberg and Thorn were not captive German territories. These towns made logistical sense to give to Poland (if you look at the map you can see why). You can say that there were captive German populations there as there were captive Polish populations in what became German territory.

If Hitler were truly the statesmen you wish to see him as being, a war of the scale he wound up engaging would never have been initiated over such small disputes.

But everyone knew that was not the limit of his campaigns anyway.

You can say Hitler made reasonable demands - if you believe his words in those “negotiations”.. I sure don’t.

He started the war after exhausting negotiations for a diplomatic solution.

That was how he made it sound as an excuse. It does not take much perception to see that he was a war monger. His very words breathe of it (years before these pseudo negotiations and years before the war started).

All he wanted was Danzig and to secure “the corridor” so he needed to bomb and starve the cities up to the Urals?.... hmm.

He had no plans of doing that beforehand?

We now know that the Poles would not made a deal because they believed false promises made by the British to protect Polish territorial integrity.

Hitler wasn’t making honest proposals to Polish territorial integrity.

The bad faith of the British is proved by the fact that they declared war on Germany for invading Poland but not on the USSR, which also invaded Poland.

It seems as if Britain was playing mostly with the concern to minimize German power the same as they had in WWI.

They were the uncomfortable allies of Russia in WWI as well.

And, Max Hastings has published a book recently discussing how Churchill tried to sell a plan in 1945 to fight the Russians in order to liberate Poland, but he had his hand smacked for such a “crazy"and impractical plan.

Obviously, Polish territorial integrity did not matter. What mattered was a pretext for war, which the British manufactured merely by throwing Poland into a two front war that caused unimaginable suffering.

Hitler caused the suffering Greg.

He had the power to not go to war. He could have had everyone on his side against the Soviets if he only did not have the wish to take the eastern lands and move their peoples out of the way in favor of Germans.


In short, Hitler may have started a war with Poland, but the British made sure he had no other choice.

Of course he had a choice to not go to war.

Hitler attacked the USSR, a regime that should have been exterminated on principle by all European powers, just in time to save all of Europe from a massive Soviet invasion.

Could have, if Hitler could have cooperated with other eastern nationalisms. But that was not in his plans.

Yes, Hitler had evil colonial intentions toward the Ukrainians and the Russians. But it is a lie of Allied propaganda that he planned to exterminate 30 million Slavs.

He wanted to breed them out of the way, discourage their thriving (in their own lands) and he certainly would kill anyone who fought against him.

On balance, I think that Hitler was the greatest statesman of the 20th century and a genuine “Great Man” of history.

He was among the worst ever. A catastrophe.

Those who are interested in exploring this further should read my review of Russell Stolfi’s Hitler: Beyond Evil and Tyranny http://www.counter-currents.com/2013/05/r-h-s-stolfis-hitler-beyond-evil-and-tyranny-part-1/

I might look into this stuff.  Per has sent me a PDF of a book that makes a similar argument.

But really - Mein Kampf - Table Talk - the results of the war.  One doesn’t need a great deal more than that. His charms and the things that he did have right are blinding you and having you gloss over glaring epistemological blunders - errors of the most important kind.

This comment appeared in entry 'Majority Radio: Dr Christian Lindtner speaks to DanielS and GW' on 03/22/15, 01:40 PM. (go to entry to post a reply)

Carolyn Yeager wrote:

“Carolyn, I don’t think that Hail offered a convincing argument.” GJ #85

Naturally, nothing would be since your mind is already made up, without reading a single serious revisionist text about it. As everyone knows, you think you can argue any point of view, on anything, and win because of your (to your mind) brilliant debating skills.

But your problem with Holocaust comes from something other than what you say it does. It comes from your sexual orientation, and maybe Christian Lindtner’s does too. Is this getting too personal for Majority Rights? I only say it because it is the underlying reason for so much anti-Nazism. For Greg and Counter-Currents, it’s alright to talk about the “Nazis”, that’s fine, good fun, but not to allow it to ever return. If more and more White people became convinced that the “Holocaust” did not happen at all, it might allow that taboo about “Nazis” to be broken. You can’t have that, can you?

I was going to say earlier that defeatists like Per Nordin and DanielS would have been put into detention work camps in National Socialist Germany. That’s the real issue with all you weak guys.

This comment appeared in entry 'Majority Radio: Dr Christian Lindtner speaks to DanielS and GW' on 03/22/15, 01:04 PM. (go to entry to post a reply)

DanielS wrote:


Posted by Carolyn Yeager on March 22, 2015, 12:21 PM | #

“GW has a daughter. I am in the process of looking for a suitable mate to have a child or two with.” -DS

LOL. You won’t have any more success with that than with anything else you’ve done.

I’ve had my successes dear.

And there is no way that you would give me credit for anything, so your opinion is worthless.

Please inform us when your first child is born ... if any of us are still alive.

I don’t need to inform you of anything.

I think there is a good chance you will be dead before my first one is born. LOL.

So GW is a one-child family man - that doesn’t create any population growth for his beloved White Britons, does it. So typical of White Nationalists not to want the responsibility of a family.

What do you know of the reasons he has for having one child?

Its obviously none of your business anyway.


“You’ve delegated yourself as an attack dog, similar as Carville was for Clinton.”

What a ridiculous statement.

No. It’s true. And you are invited to leave.

I try to preserve the truth from attack by the likes of people such as yourself.

Bullshit.

You are also a copy cat, DS

No I am not Carolyn.

you take my words

I take your words? are you crazy?

and turn them around against me or someone else.

Not an accurate assessment dear. But I don’t care because I don’t respect your opinion.

You have zero originality.

Really not true. But I am not going to itemize my more original ideas. Who the fuck are you? Nobody.

Graham Lister is an excruciating bore. He fits in here perfectly.

Not a bore, and plenty welcome here.

 

This comment appeared in entry 'Majority Radio: Dr Christian Lindtner speaks to DanielS and GW' on 03/22/15, 12:56 PM. (go to entry to post a reply)

Greg Johnson wrote:

Graham, I disagree regarding National Socialism and Fascism. They did not fail. They were destroyed by the Allies and international Jewry, who were threatened by them because they showed signs of being fantastic successes.

Hitler was not solely or even largely responsible for World War II. The British and the French started WWII. Hitler started a war with Poland, over German territories held captive by Poland. He started the war after exhausting negotiations for a diplomatic solution.

We now know that the Poles would not made a deal because they believed false promises made by the British to protect Polish territorial integrity.

The bad faith of the British is proved by the fact that they declared war on Germany for invading Poland but not on the USSR, which also invaded Poland. Obviously, Polish territorial integrity did not matter. What mattered was a pretext for war, which the British manufactured merely by throwing Poland into a two front war that caused unimaginable suffering.

In short, Hitler may have started a war with Poland, but the British made sure he had no other choice.

Hitler attacked the USSR, a regime that should have been exterminated on principle by all European powers, just in time to save all of Europe from a massive Soviet invasion. Yes, Hitler had evil colonial intentions toward the Ukrainians and the Russians. But it is a lie of Allied propaganda that he planned to exterminate 30 million Slavs.

On balance, I think that Hitler was the greatest statesman of the 20th century, and a genuine “Great Man” of history. Those who are interested in exploring this further should read my review of Russell Stolfi’s Hitler: Beyond Evil and Tyranny http://www.counter-currents.com/2013/05/r-h-s-stolfis-hitler-beyond-evil-and-tyranny-part-1/

This comment appeared in entry 'Majority Radio: Dr Christian Lindtner speaks to DanielS and GW' on 03/22/15, 12:39 PM. (go to entry to post a reply)

Carolyn Yeager wrote:

“GW has a daughter. I am in the process of looking for a suitable mate to have a child or two with.” -DS

LOL. You won’t have any more success with that than with anything else you’ve done. Please inform us when your first child is born ... if any of us are still alive. So GW is a one-child family man - that doesn’t create any population growth for his beloved White Britons, does it. So typical of White Nationalists not to want the responsibility of a family.

“You’ve delegated yourself as an attack dog, similar as Carville was for Clinton.”

What a ridiculous statement. I try to preserve the truth from attack by the likes of people such as yourself. You are also a copy cat, DS - you take my words and turn them around against me or someone else. You have zero originality.

Graham Lister is an excruciating bore. He fits in here perfectly.

This comment appeared in entry 'Majority Radio: Dr Christian Lindtner speaks to DanielS and GW' on 03/22/15, 12:21 PM. (go to entry to post a reply)

Graham_Lister wrote:

Greg I think you’re essentially right. The continued existence of say the Catalan people as a particular bio-cultural phenomenon in no way falls or stands by the historical events we are discussing. Jews and their inverted opposites (oxygen thieves of the worst sort) both assert the utter centrality of those events in human, and even no doubt, cosmic history. Both are engaged in 5th rate quasi-theological come ideological ‘arguments’ that have as much genuine relevance to European well-being as debating how many angels can sit comfortably on the head of the pin.

For the Jews they exclusively claim ownership of both the Holocaust (not true the sense that other groups also suffered greatly under the Nazi regime) and hence, effectively, a monopoly on victimhood and human suffering. All the crap about the ‘unique’ nature of those events, in itself is a bogus and ideologically driven move, which in turn they ruthlessly exploit for futher ideological ends. This is doubly offensive as any observer of the human condition knows, there is plenty of suffering to go around and secondly the hyper-exploitative use of their own people’s suffering to give Israel a metaphorical blank cheque, shakedown money from Swiss banks etc., is so insidiously repulsive even fellow Jews call it out for the grubby conduct it is (Finkelstein’s book on the H industry most obviously).

But the mouth breathing F people agree with the cardinality assertion. That yes the Jews are the alpha and omega of human history (whoops there goes that idiotic monomania again) and an attitude along the lines of “yes events under a particular German regime would have been the most important thing in history had they occurred, but they didn’t, however we would love to try to implement such ideas asap”. Which of course can only appeal to the psychologically abnormal and very low IQ types.

The other thing about the F people is their stupidity come wilful intellectual dishonesty. The Nazi regime lasted less than 20 years, was responsible, directly and indirectly, for the deaths of millions of bona fide Europeans including Germans. That’s pretty strong empirical evidence via a ‘natural experiment’ that the model of politics and society that Hitler lovers propose is fundamentally flawed. Scientifically minded folk tend to respect such powerful empirical evidence.

But the more ‘theologically’ minded can attempt to rationalise anything away in order to save the faith. Hey man ‘real’ liberalism/free-market economics/fascism/socialism/communism etc has ‘never’ been tried etc. I find such people and their way of ‘thinking’ to be extremely tiresome. And as they are at root engaged in a quasi-religion come ideological faith their obvious intellectual dishonesty prevents any constructive or positive dialogue - well mocking them can be deeply funny but hardly the best use of one’s time.

If someone doesn’t embrace the very basic habits of intellectual honesty namely respect for evidence (all the relevant evidence) and the concept of falsification and falliablism then frankly I will not waste my breath, or typing upon them. I don’t mind honest mistakes or shortcomings in knowledge and understanding as these apply to all human beings, but it’s the damn intellectual dishonesty that I find the worst vice. I literally cannot stand such people.

For more on my thoughts as to why fascism of any sort cannot work see my essay here http://www.majorityrights.com/weblog/comments/the_ghosts_of_the_suffered

This comment appeared in entry 'Majority Radio: Dr Christian Lindtner speaks to DanielS and GW' on 03/22/15, 08:23 AM. (go to entry to post a reply)

Page 1 of 3499 pages  1 2 3 >  Last ›