<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rdf:RDF
    xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#"
    xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
    xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
    xmlns:admin="http://webns.net/mvcb/"
    xmlns:cc="http://web.resource.org/cc/"
    xmlns="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/">

<channel rdf:about="http://majorityrights.com/weblog/index/">

    <title>1. MajorityRights.com (main blog)</title>
    <link>http://majorityrights.com/weblog/index/</link>
    <description>We discuss issues related to the preservation of Western culture and the ethnic genetic interests of people of European ancestry.</description>
    <dc:language>en</dc:language>
    <dc:creator>wirebiz@btinternet.com</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2013-05-22T22:42:29+00:00</dc:date>
    <admin:generatorAgent rdf:resource="pMachine" />
    
    <items>
      <rdf:Seq>
      <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://majorityrights.com/weblog/the_woolwich_outrage_cant_have_the_lower_orders_getting_too_excited" />
      
      <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://majorityrights.com/weblog/white_air_force" />
      
      <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://majorityrights.com/weblog/independent_academic_validation_of_industrially_useful_cold_fusion_device" />
      
      <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://majorityrights.com/weblog/christian_national_bolshevism" />
      
      <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://majorityrights.com/weblog/kai_murros_speaks1" />
      
      <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://majorityrights.com/weblog/griffin_moslem_grooming_and_a_misinterpreted_article" />
      
      <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://majorityrights.com/weblog/neolithic_mitochondrial_haplogroup_h_genomes_and_the_genetic_origins_of_eur" />
      
      <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://majorityrights.com/weblog/the_snps_of_primitive_man" />
      
      <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://majorityrights.com/weblog/liberal_modernity_and_nihilism_alain_badiou_on_evil" />
      
      <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://majorityrights.com/weblog/ukip_after_eastliegh" />
      </rdf:Seq>
    </items>

</channel>


    <item rdf:about="http://majorityrights.com/weblog/the_woolwich_outrage_cant_have_the_lower_orders_getting_too_excited">
      <title>The Woolwich Outrage &#45; can&#8217;t have the lower orders getting too excited</title>
      <link>http://majorityrights.com/weblog/the_woolwich_outrage_cant_have_the_lower_orders_getting_too_excited</link>
      <description>The British media were doing so well to avoid covering the riots in Stockholm.&amp;nbsp; No bad news could be tolerated, you see.&amp;nbsp; Nothing to be allowed to penetrate the carapace of blissful multcultic ignorance.&amp;nbsp; Not while this UKIP surge was on everyone&#8217;s mind.&amp;nbsp; Then, right out of the blue, a completely savage and random attack by two black Moslems on a serving soldier.&amp;nbsp; In broad daylight in London.&amp;nbsp; A virtual beheading.&amp;nbsp; Rivers of blood.&amp;nbsp; A sole middle&#45;aged white woman standing up for right.&amp;nbsp; The Metropolitan Police Service checking Health and Safety regs for twenty minutes before finally showing their faces and shooting the bastards.&amp;nbsp; The Muslim Council of Great Britain gets in early with a bit of damage limitation.

Cue the media.&amp;nbsp; Cue their control instincts.&amp;nbsp; &#8220;Comments are closed&#8221;.&amp;nbsp; &#8220;Comment removed&#8221;.&amp;nbsp; &#8220;Edited by a moderator&#8221;.&amp;nbsp; Meanwhile, nothing will shake our determination to  have business as usual blah, blah.&amp;nbsp; Meanwhile, with lightning speed the EDL Twittered and Facebooked it&#8217;s way to Woolwich.&amp;nbsp; Meanwhile, the media pile in with an anti&#45;white, anti&#45;EDL message.&amp;nbsp; A handy bit of misdirection.

And so it goes.&amp;nbsp; Just one DT article carried comments for a very few hours.&amp;nbsp; You can read them here.</description>
      <dc:subject>Islam &amp;amp; Islamification, Media,</dc:subject>
      <dc:creator>Guessedworker</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2013-05-22T22:42:29+00:00</dc:date>
    </item>

    <item rdf:about="http://majorityrights.com/weblog/white_air_force">
      <title>White Air Force</title>
      <link>http://majorityrights.com/weblog/white_air_force</link>
      <description>I was recently compelled to rebut a colleague’s pessimistic remark that parts of Western Europe and The U.S. may be irretrievably gone to non&#45;Whites.



&amp;nbsp;</description>
      <dc:subject></dc:subject>
      <dc:creator>DanielS</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2013-05-22T07:19:12+00:00</dc:date>
    </item>

    <item rdf:about="http://majorityrights.com/weblog/independent_academic_validation_of_industrially_useful_cold_fusion_device">
      <title>Independent Academic Validation of Industrially Useful Cold Fusion Device</title>
      <link>http://majorityrights.com/weblog/independent_academic_validation_of_industrially_useful_cold_fusion_device</link>
      <description>An energy revolution has been reported in a joint paper by scientists from Bologna University, Uppsala University and Royal Institute of Technology, Stockholm, titled &#8220;Indication of anomalous heat energy production in a reactor device containing hydrogen loaded nickel powder.&#8221; This is the long&#45;awaited independent validation of the infamous &#8220;E&#45;Cat&#8221; or &#8220;Energy Catalyzer&#8221; by controversial inventor Andrea Rossi. Quoting the paper: &#8220;Even by the most conservative assumptions as to the errors in the measurements, the result is still one order of magnitude greater than conventional energy sources.&#8221;

The pseudo&#45;skeptics have long&#45;ago lost the peer&#45;reviewed independently published discourse and have been completely reliant on the media and political echo&#45;chamber. The significance of this is now outside of academic discourse entirely and threatens the stability of the echo&#45;chamber.</description>
      <dc:subject></dc:subject>
      <dc:creator>James Bowery</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2013-05-20T07:25:33+00:00</dc:date>
    </item>

    <item rdf:about="http://majorityrights.com/weblog/christian_national_bolshevism">
      <title>Christian National Bolshevism</title>
      <link>http://majorityrights.com/weblog/christian_national_bolshevism</link>
      <description>https://www.facebook.com/pages/Christian&#45;National&#45;Bolshevism&#45;%D0%A5%D1%80%D0%B8%D1%81%D1%82%D0%B8%D0%B0%D0%BD%D1%81%D0%BA%D0%B8%D0%B9&#45;%D0%9D%D0%B0%D1%86%D0%B8%D0%BE%D0%BD%D0%B0%D0%BB&#45;%D0%91%D0%BE%D0%BB%D1%8C%D1%88%D0%B5%D0%B2%D0%B8%D0%B7%D0%BC/230569607023216

http://civilitasofgod.blogspot.com/2012/01/behold&#45;christian&#45;communism.html</description>
      <dc:subject></dc:subject>
      <dc:creator>S&amp;oslash;ren Renner</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2013-05-19T15:14:30+00:00</dc:date>
    </item>

    <item rdf:about="http://majorityrights.com/weblog/kai_murros_speaks1">
      <title>Kai Murros Speaks</title>
      <link>http://majorityrights.com/weblog/kai_murros_speaks1</link>
      <description></description>
      <dc:subject></dc:subject>
      <dc:creator>S&amp;oslash;ren Renner</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2013-05-17T13:16:00+00:00</dc:date>
    </item>

    <item rdf:about="http://majorityrights.com/weblog/griffin_moslem_grooming_and_a_misinterpreted_article">
      <title>Griffin, Moslem Grooming and a &#8220;misinterpreted&#8221; article</title>
      <link>http://majorityrights.com/weblog/griffin_moslem_grooming_and_a_misinterpreted_article</link>
      <description>Today Sean Thomas, the Daily Telegraph blogger, journalist and, under a pseudonym, author, posted a piece about the latest case of Moslem Grooming, this time in Oxford.&amp;nbsp; It was titled &#8220;Oxford gang rape: did people ignore this sort of scandal because racist Nick Griffin was the first to mention them?&#8221;

The article skips through a little of the history of the offence before arriving, in the last two paragraphs, at the efforts made by Nick Griffin to raise consciousness of it and shame the police into action:

There&#8217;s one more figure who played an important role in this saga. As long ago as 2001, Nick Griffin, the leader of the BNP, was making claims about Asian grooming gangs. In 2004 he repeated these allegations in a speech clandestinely recorded by the BBC for a TV documentary, Secret Agent. He was arrested and charged with inciting racial hatred.

Which is exactly what he was doing, of course. He was making his allegations to stir up ethnic strife. Right&#45;thinking people, aware of the BNP&#8217;s record as liars, presumed that these stories were just racist demagoguery. No doubt Griffin feels vindicated today: for telling the truth before anyone else. And yet it was thanks in part to his thuggish intervention that society felt able to ignore the scandal. And thus the abuse continued.


Comments on the article were disabled.&amp;nbsp; But appalled commenters raised the concerns on an unrelated thread, myself among them.&amp;nbsp; Thomas let it be known via a tweet that his original article had been doctored by a DT editor but it had since been amended.&amp;nbsp; It was still bloody awful, obviously.&amp;nbsp; So I emailed him to tell him so:</description>
      <dc:subject>British Politics, Islam &amp;amp; Islamification,</dc:subject>
      <dc:creator>Guessedworker</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2013-05-16T00:18:35+00:00</dc:date>
    </item>

    <item rdf:about="http://majorityrights.com/weblog/neolithic_mitochondrial_haplogroup_h_genomes_and_the_genetic_origins_of_eur">
      <title>Neolithic mitochondrial haplogroup H genomes and the genetic origins of Europeans</title>
      <link>http://majorityrights.com/weblog/neolithic_mitochondrial_haplogroup_h_genomes_and_the_genetic_origins_of_eur</link>
      <description>From Nature Communications:Haplogroup H dominates present&#45;day Western European mitochondrial DNA variability (&gt;40%), yet was less common (~19%) among Early Neolithic farmers (~5450 BC) and virtually absent in Mesolithic hunter&#45;gatherers. Here we investigate this major component of the maternal population history of modern Europeans and sequence 39 complete haplogroup H mitochondrial genomes from ancient human remains. We then compare this ‘real&#45;time’ genetic data with cultural changes taking place between the Early Neolithic (~5450 BC) and Bronze Age (~2200 BC) in Central Europe. Our results reveal that the current diversity and distribution of haplogroup H were largely established by the Mid Neolithic (~4000 BC), but with substantial genetic contributions from subsequent pan&#45;European cultures such as the Bell Beakers expanding out of Iberia in the Late Neolithic (~2800 BC). Dated haplogroup H genomes allow us to reconstruct the recent evolutionary history of haplogroup H and reveal a mutation rate 45% higher than current estimates for human mitochondria.


&amp;nbsp;</description>
      <dc:subject></dc:subject>
      <dc:creator>James Bowery</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2013-05-15T14:53:14+00:00</dc:date>
    </item>

    <item rdf:about="http://majorityrights.com/weblog/the_snps_of_primitive_man">
      <title>The SNPs of Primitive Man</title>
      <link>http://majorityrights.com/weblog/the_snps_of_primitive_man</link>
      <description>In The Mind of Primitive Man, Boas wrote:

In interpreting these observations, it must be strongly
emphasized that the races which we are accustomed to
call higher races are not by any means and in all re&#45;
spects farthest removed from the animal. The European
and the Mongol have the largest brains; the European
has a small face and a high nose — all features farther
removed from the probable animal ancestor of man than
the corresponding features of other races. On the other
hand, the European shares lower characteristics with the
Australian, both retaining in the strongest degree the
hairiness of the animal ancestor, while the specifically
human development of the red lip is most marked in the
Negro. The proportions of the limbs of the Negro are
also more distinct from the corresponding proportions in
the higher apes than are those of the European.

When we interpret these data in the light of modern
biological concepts, we may say that the specifically hu&#45;
man features appear with varying intensity in various
races, and that the divergence from the animal ancestor
has developed in varying directions.


Boas wanted us to believe that no group is necessarily more primitive than another.&amp;nbsp; Today, due in no small part to Boas&#8217; life work, it is assumed that anyone disputing this &#8216;modern consensus&#8217; must be an evil cretin.&amp;nbsp; Even for some white racialists, it is considered vulgar or gratuitously pejorative to say, for example, that negroes are primitive.&amp;nbsp; 

It must be understood, though, that primitive is a relative term that can be based on objective measures.&amp;nbsp; When we say negroes are primitive (in the biological sense), we mean they are closer to our last common ancestor (LCA) than are other groups.&amp;nbsp; Such empirical claims must be based on their scientific merit, not the prevailing zeitgeist or group feelings.&amp;nbsp; I agree with Boas when he wrote the following in the preface to the 1938 edition of TMoPM:

Still worse is the subjection
of science to ignorant prejudice in countries controlled by
dictators. Such control has extended particularly to books
dealing with the subject matter of race and culture. Since
nothing is permitted to be printed that runs counter to the
ignorant whims and prejudices of the governing clique,
there can be no trustworthy science. When a publisher
whose pride used to be the number and value of his scien&#45;
tific books announces in his calendar a book trying to
show that race mixture is not (sic) harmful, withdraws the
same book after a dictator comes into power, when great
encyclopedias are rewritten according to prescribed tenets,
when scientists either do not dare or are not allowed to
publish results contradicting the prescribed doctrines,
when others, in order to advance their own material in&#45;
terests or blinded by uncontrolled emotion follow blindly
the prescribed road no confidence can be placed in their
statements. The suppression of intellectual freedom rings
the death knell of science.


The traditional way to rank groups in terms of proximity to the LCA is based on anatomical features.&amp;nbsp; As shown by Boas, though, such methods can result in people with different motivations cherry picking features for their argument.&amp;nbsp; A better measure, then, may be a genome&#45;wide comparison that counts the alleles shared with the LCA (ancestral alleles).&amp;nbsp; Based on the HGDP SNP data, I created the following &#8216;hate plot&#8217; showing the percent of ancestral alleles by human groups:</description>
      <dc:subject>Genetics &amp;amp; Human Bio&#45;Diversity,</dc:subject>
      <dc:creator>Dasein</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2013-05-08T20:03:03+00:00</dc:date>
    </item>

    <item rdf:about="http://majorityrights.com/weblog/liberal_modernity_and_nihilism_alain_badiou_on_evil">
      <title>Liberal Modernity and Nihilism &#45; Alain Badiou on Evil</title>
      <link>http://majorityrights.com/weblog/liberal_modernity_and_nihilism_alain_badiou_on_evil</link>
      <description>Alain Badiou&#8217;s thoughts on evil and associated matters in an interview from 2001.</description>
      <dc:subject>Political Philosophy,</dc:subject>
      <dc:creator>Graham Lister</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2013-05-04T11:38:25+00:00</dc:date>
    </item>

    <item rdf:about="http://majorityrights.com/weblog/ukip_after_eastliegh">
      <title>UKIP after Eastleigh</title>
      <link>http://majorityrights.com/weblog/ukip_after_eastliegh</link>
      <description>The final opinion poll is in &#45; in fact, it&#8217;s the only council&#45;dedicated poll that has been done &#45; and the British public, or at least that section who will be voting in the local elections tomorrow, are poised to deliver their verdict for real.&amp;nbsp; There is, of course, huge speculation about the fortunes of the United Kingdom Independence Party.&amp;nbsp; Will its support be spread too thin to deliver the seats it deserves &#45; the enduring penalty of the First Past The Post system?&amp;nbsp; Or is this going to be the election when the party jumps forward and announces itself as a truly broad&#45;based, national party of, if not yet renewal, certainly protest?

We will start to find out about this time tomorrow night.&amp;nbsp; Meanwhile, the smear tactics of the mainstream parties and their friends in the media leaves little doubt that UKIP&#8217;s rise is real and significant.&amp;nbsp; We are in for a very interesting next 36 hours.

A good result for UKIP would be to win 100 new council seats across the areas where voting will take place (mostly Tory shire counties).&amp;nbsp; The Comres poll in these areas produced a 22% voting intention for the party.&amp;nbsp; It should be remembered that protest voters are motivated voters, so that 22% could punch above its weight.&amp;nbsp; But I think it&#8217;s wise to temper any such expectations with the knowledge that UKIP is a young party without a political history in many of the wards it is fighting.&amp;nbsp; Electoral politics, at least in Britain, is not a five&#45;minute packet soup, and elections at local authority level frequently favour well&#45;regarded personalities, and hinge on particular local issues.

But ... if the present, very exciting signs are borne out by the ballot box, we may be at the start of a genuine challenge to the parties of the mainstream &#45; something we might have hoped, a few short years ago, would come from the BNP.&amp;nbsp; But better UKIP than nobody.

I will post interesting results and commentary on the thread.</description>
      <dc:subject>British Politics,</dc:subject>
      <dc:creator>Guessedworker</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2013-05-01T22:58:56+00:00</dc:date>
    </item>


</rdf:RDF>