Majorityrights Central > Category: Law & Order

By David Hamilton

On 18 November 2008 a copy of a BNP members list was published on the internet, and thus began a train of events that is destined to be one of history’s turning points. It revealed to a trusting public what the authorities are really like. These decent people who are supposed to be looking after our interests now stand exposed as totalitarians who will do anything, however oppressive and tyrannical, to silence dissent.

Innocent members of the public will be surprised at how oppressed the British people are unless they remain quiescent and only do permitted activities like watch telly, support sports teams and go to bars. If they dare speak out or campaign against certain injustices they will be persecuted and even brutalised.

There are many in this country who sincerely believe in freedom and democracy.  They frequently gravitate towards the easily-occupied “moral high ground” of condemning racism by whites.  But they rarely comprehend that a totalitarian, undemocratic structure has been created to oppress whites. Do they ever stop to think that in the home of the Mother of Parliaments, the Rule of Law and representative democracy the police would torture a political prisoner?

There was even a thinly-veiled incitement to violence from the established media. On 20/11/2008 Mirror columnist Brian Reade wrote, under a picture of Nick Griffin, and in mock-worried tones:-

I’m worried about the 12,000 BNP members whose names and addresses have been leaked on the internet. I pray their details don’t fall into the hands of any of those black radical groups known to take a very dim view of white neo-Nazis. It would be truly awful if anything nasty happened to these nice people wouldn’t it?

In part, at least, his wish was realised.

READ MORE...

David Hamilton

According to the Mail on Sunday, which obtained the official statistics of 37 police forces under the Freedom of Information Act, there is an offence involving a knife every 24 minutes of the day in England. 

There were over 5,500 serious crimes involving knives in just three months this year - one every 24 minutes. That is 55 knife-related murders and more than 2,000 stabbings.  [And that figure does not include data from Northamptonshire, Somerset and Lincolnshire - Ed]

The newspaper explained:-

London, Manchester and Birmingham are the worst-affected areas, while West Yorkshire, Merseyside and Northumbria police forces were also in the top 10. During just April, May and June this year, the Metropolitan Police recorded 1,580 offences – more than quarter of the national total.  A breakdown reveals 17 people are stabbed or robbed at knife point in the every day and by July 2008 twenty teenagers had been murdered in London.  The total for the whole of last year was 26 shooting or stabbing killings among young people”.

Our elites have imported gang warfare while pretending that the immigrants were soft, sentimental like pets and if we were nice to them they would be nice to us!

Common sense tells people that immigrant areas are no longer safe for white people to live in.  But to obfuscate the facts, a 9 percent reduction in crime is claimed by the police, with the violent crime sector being reduced by 8 percent.  As is now well known, in areas with much crime many people do not report burglaries or muggings because experience tells them that the police will do nothing about it.  Less than half of such crimes are reported.  It is a deceit visited upon the population by a government who cannot control crime because they are acolytes of the religion of equality, and no racial or ethnic group can be more inclined to certain crimes than any other.

READ MORE...

The average IQ of the prison population in Britain, including blacks and other low IQ peoples, is around 87.  In Australia it’s a little better, with 40% reporting an IQ below 86.  So I guess the white section of the US prison population is unlikely to weigh in with an average IQ above 90.  Average mind.  Fifty percent of them don’t make it out of the 80s.

So just how easy is it for an FBI agent to lead an average loser, caught in possession of illegal firearms, a supply of metamorphine, and a sun-wheel ring or whatever, into a confession?

And wouldn’t the media boys just love this one to be true?

The trial of Iyad Albattikhi at Preston Crown Court came to a close today when, after 10 days of deliberations, the jury was unable to reach a verdict.  Justice Henriques:-

told them: “It is with very great regret I discharge you from returning a verdict. There will be a retrial.

“I would like to thank you for the very, very conscientious way you have gone about this case.”

He praised them for being “highly professional” in the midst of “continuous tensions and pressure”.

Mr Henriques thanked the Downes family for the “admirable way they had conducted themselves” throughout the hearing.

He added that the retrial was likely to take place around January next year and would be at Preston Crown Court or Manchester Crown Court.

Charlene’s mother and father spoke briefly to reporters on the steps of the courthouse (video).

The outcome is, perhaps, not surprising given the quality of the evidence presented to the court.  In the absence of DNA evidence, an audio recording of the barely distinguishable voices of Albattikhi and his business partner Mohammed Reveshi seems to have been the principal exhibit.  The two men denied even knowing Charlene, and claimed that references to her on the recording were totally innocent and misunderstood.  In the normal course of things, and assuming that no new evidence is unearthed by Lancashire Police, this should be enough to see them escape conviction next year.

I would very much like to know the ethnic make-up of the twelve men and women of the jury, and how they divided in the jury room.  I would also like to know whether the accepted fact of child abuse by “some of the men” working in the takeaways frequented by Charlene and other girls has triggered a police investigation.  I doubt it.  Other instances of grooming of white girls by Moslems in England’s northern towns have been ignored by police.  They would, after all, generate the “continuous tensions and pressure” referred to by Justice Henriques.

My thanks to Donna and Sue on the Charlene thread that has been simmering away since March 2006, and to the untangled refusnik named Smith, all of whom have provided “heads-up” gen on the trial now begun at Preston Crown Court of (alleged) burger-bar butcher and paedophile Iyad Albittikhi.

The good news is that the MSM has finally begun reporting Charlene’s fate, locally and nationally.  This is an advance, obviously, on the near-perfect silence that greeted the breakthrough of the initial arrest and commital to trial.  But it remains a cause of journalistic shame that such an exceptional and vile crime against a 14-year old adolescent girl is acknowledged only in the judicial breach, so to speak, and is then accorded a completely unacceptable and thusfar universal shunning of the central feature of the case.

Look, for example, at the headline of the Mail article: Killer joked that he put schoolgirl lover in his kebabs.  Schoolgirl lover?

In the body of the copy we read that prosecuting council Tim Holroyde, QC, told Preston Crown Court:-

READ MORE...

This entry on Stratclyde Police’s website appears to have been picked up by local media, thence the BBC and AP.  Well, it’s evil white racism against a poor Algerian asylum seeker and her child, isn’t it?  Or is it?

Indecent Assault - Yoker

Strathclyde Police is appealing for witnesses after a 33-year-old woman and her 1- year-old son were indecently assaulted near Yoker.

About 1630 hours on Tuesday 3 April 2007 a 33-year-old woman was walking her 1-year-old son in his pram on the cycle path between Plean Street and Dyke Road, Yoker, Glasgow when they were approached by a group of males who threw stones at them and then kicked the woman.

One man then exposed himself and indecently assaulted the woman and then attempted to perform an indecent act on the 1-year-old boy.

The woman fled the scene with her child, leaving the pram, a headscarf and a baby’s bottle on the cycle path.

The suspect is described as a white male, aged 20 to 25, very short hair, tall and thin and wearing white and blue track suit trousers.

DI Andy McWilliam said today “This was a particularly harrowing ordeal for the woman and her son. I would urge the other males in this group to assist the police in identifying the male responsible. I am also keen to locate the whereabouts of the pram, headscarf and baby’s bottle.

No mention yet of video or DNA evidence, which would seal the issue.  But we’ll see.

The Brit papers are all over Sir Ian Blair’s eggregiously correct Met this morning, following the fun news that a Muslim member of the Diplomatic Protection Squad was re-assigned at his own request from guarding the Israeli Embassy in London.

Apparently, the officer concerned, one PC Alexander Omar Basha, suffered moral qualms at his presence on the steps of the Embassy while the occupants’ friends and family were bombing Lebanon.  The last Merkava 4 has rolled back across the border and PC Basha is working normally again.  But the damage is done.  And, it seems to me, in a couple of ways.

First, professionally.  The man who is quoted everywhere this morning is John O’Connor, a former Flying Squad commander.  He told the Sun:-

This is the beginning of the end for British policing.  When you join the police, you do so to provide a service to the public.  If you cannot perform those duties, you leave.

But if it was just a question of professionalism Sir Ian would not have reacted so jumpily in ordering an urgent review of the decision to grant PC Basha’s request.  No Commissioner has been more political than this one.  He has made politics paramount in his beloved creation, the Metrocultural Police Service.  But leftist idealism like his always justifies its little political crimes by the presumption of Good, and that presumption is glorious, hypocritical toast if a discomforted Muslim must be moved from any duty on grounds, basically, of faith or even evil race.  Sir Ian’s progressive, inclusive Met is stripped of all moral force.  It’s a joke, and I or anybody else can refuse to give a witness statement, for example, to any minority garbed in blue simply because that is the dictate of conscience.  Muslim, Hindu, black, queer, they’re all fair game.

As multicultural luck would have it, Sir Ian’s truest friends have very quickly worked this out and come forward with a possible answer.

The chairman of the Association of Muslim Police, Superintendent Dal Babu, insists that the Basha issue was not one of conscience:-

This is about the welfare of an individual and not about a moral issue,” he said.

“I think we are going down a very, very slippery road if we start having postings based on individual officers’ conscience.

Of course, it’s all just sophistry.  There are no clear dividing lines between conscience and welfare in the aims of Mr Babu’s association.  They intertwine and dissolve within the peculiar whole of Islam:-

The AMP is formally recognised by the Metropolitan Police Service.  It is active in pursuing faith-friendly policies and has been instrumental in ensuring the provision of many facilities to the benefit of Muslim staff, including Hijaab for female officers, ability to wear Islamic/cultural dress when not in uniform, provision of Halaal food and facilities for Salaah (Islamic Prayer).

People are not cyphers.  That’s the problem.  But neither is multiracialism remotely normal.  As long as there are a hundred and fifty varieties of humanity in my capital city we must all be equal under the law, and the law must be enforced by serving policemen with as complete an impartiality as humanly possible.  Cyphers the police must indeed be.

In contrast, however, Sir Ian truly, madly, deeply believes that the Met must look like those one hundred and fifty varieties of homo sapiens wandering the streets.  He is simply wrong.

You can picture the scene.  The DCI had been in Court all morning, and from there straight into conference with the CPS, the PA, Coroner’s Office and a few voluntary sector types.  All part of the Minister’s new “Startline” initiative.  A reheat, naturally.  No different to “Overview”, which wasn’t any different to “Deliver, a Multi-Agency Approach to Crime Management for a New Society in a New Millenium”.  And that was back in 99, when people were still naïve enough to believe that new fangled top-down theories could do more than the old-time, hairy-arsed copper.

But at the sharp end things have moved on since then.  Coppering is stretched out between two worlds, the politician’s and the criminal’s.  And they are growing farther and farther apart by the day.  It wasn’t the crime-fighting that was causing the trouble, really - even though the scrotes were a different proposition.  No, it was whichever bright-eyed grad happened to be writing papers for the Home Office at the time.  Those buggers never learned.  Next year there would be another meaningless CM initiative, and two more the year after that.  And then there would be all the latest bloody sensitivity training intiatives, equality audits, outreach recommendations ...  It was an extremely strange way to nick criminals.

Still, one has to play the game, show willing and all that.  The meeting that afternoon had required more than the usual quota of willing, of right-noise making.  So when, finally, the DCI nipped in to the station on his way home it was past eight.  He was tired.  He didn’t want to hang around.  Just get a couple of quick things done and then get away.

But that hope went up in smoke as soon as he pushed through the cheap plywood door to his office.  His extention was ringing.  He snatched it up.

READ MORE...