Bowery Goes Stark!

Posted by Søren Renner on Monday, 06 February 2012 10:29.

http://reasonradionetwork.com/category/programs/the-stark-truth
http://reasonradionetwork.com/downloads/tst/VoR-The_Stark_Truth-20120201.mp3

The Stark Truth: Interview with James Bowery, Part 1

Robert [Stark] interviews James Bowery. Topics include:
  Bowery details pioneering background in IT and its funding programs - thwarted by Jewish interests causing him to re-think his concerns;

  Horizontal transmission – border crossing - key to evolution of Jewish virulence

  Both freely chosen ecologies of the new world and deeply evolved European ecologies made ready by county sized political units; 

  Civilization removed characteristic European male way of challenging interlopers to a duel, placing immigration control in hands of state, creates drone males;

  Internet most promising aspect of situation now – bypasses central controls, facilitates voluntary associations, independence from global forces;

  Primary barriers for Whites: ‘shells’ of nations, used by global interests, turning security apparatus against people; and residual “worker bee” mentality.

Tags:



Comments:


1

Posted by daniel on Mon, 06 Feb 2012 11:16 | #

The third bullet point should be:

Both freely chosen ecologies of the new world and deeply evolved European ecologies made ready for globalist onslaught by county sized political units;

would be a bit more clarifying. But ok


2

Posted by savrola on Mon, 06 Feb 2012 11:39 | #

One of the most important thinkers of our time.


3

Posted by Now Impressed on Mon, 06 Feb 2012 13:10 | #

The highlighted excerpts above have convinced me to download and listen to the interview. Finally, interesting topics worthy of discussion.

“Horizontal transmission – border crossing - key to evolution of Jewish virulence.”

It brings a new shade of meaning to the oft-heard term “the international community” yes?

“Civilization removed characteristic European male way of challenging interlopers to a duel, placing immigration control in hands of state, creates drone males;”

Was it Bowery who used to go on about dueling? It’s an interesting idea and directly relevant to evolution/selection, although I’m not sure if it would select for the best brains or simply the biggest brawn.

“Internet most promising aspect of situation now – bypasses central controls, facilitates voluntary associations, independence from global forces;”

There’s a recent article in the US press about how the Republicans threw Hollywood (content/copyright owners) under the bus, since Hollywood and the media are generally hostile to the Republican party and base (unspoken - because Hollywood is Jewish) and the anti-piracy/copyright industry is generally hated by the young, internet savvy crowd. The media companies - including the political media - have been screaming about the disruption to their business models ever since the early 2000s.

The most interesting aspect of the new internet media is the organized trolling campaigns, of which Israeli hasbara is perhaps the most well known, although the Chinese 50 Cents Army is surely bigger.


4

Posted by Søren Renner on Mon, 06 Feb 2012 13:16 | #

The most interesting aspect of the new internet media is the organized trolling campaigns, of which Israeli hasbara is perhaps the most well known, although the Chinese 50 Cents Army is surely bigger.

The GNAA is worth mentioning in this context, although the question as to whether GNAA trolling qualifies as “organized” could trigger a flamewar.

http://www.gnaa.eu/wiki/about

 


5

Posted by Again Impressed on Mon, 06 Feb 2012 13:36 | #

I enjoyed many belly laughs from the GNAA back in the day. Obviously, my favorite campaign of theirs was JewsDidWTC. But hasbara and the Chinese 50 Cents Army are “trolling” in a different league, it’s not a joke to see who takes the bait, it’s organized propaganda using the same sort of focus groups and audience statistics that the billion dollar ad agencies do.

Somewhere online there is a “how to” about dominating message boards, burying content you don’t want seen, and using sockpuppets to simulate consensus on certain topics. Some WN site somewhere had an excerpt on an old communist technique of running a public meeting. The idea is to take four people, plant them at the four corners of the audience, and have them each speak. The typical audience member will then have to turn their heads four times to see the speakers, and this was considered psychologically powerful enough to create the impression of a consensus.

The previous comments on Frankfurt school/postmodernism were quite interesting. Falsely ascribe to your opponents outrageous beliefs and motivations and completely ignore any facts or reasoning they give. You win that trolling contest when the opponents starts defending themselves from your false charges. In US politics, this is how “racism” works:

A. I oppose Obama for his policy X.

B. You just oppose Obama because he’s black, you’re a racist.

A. I am not racist! I don’t care that Obama’s black!

The most common trolls I’ve seen on the pro-white websites are called “concern trolls” - these are especially used to bury certain topics. “Don’t talk about this subject Y because it will make us look bad.”

http://blogs.alternet.org/speakeasy/2010/06/18/general-petraeus-concern-troll/


6

Posted by robo on Mon, 06 Feb 2012 13:56 | #

It’s an interesting idea and directly relevant to evolution/selection, although I’m not sure if it would select for the best brains or simply the biggest brawn.

The great beasts of nature are much stronger than the strongest men. But much weaker men routinely slay such beasts using tools and the natural environment.


7

Posted by Jimmy Marr on Mon, 06 Feb 2012 14:12 | #

Bye, bye Yellow Mist!


8

Posted by Lew on Mon, 06 Feb 2012 14:13 | #

Great interview. Well worth an hour.


9

Posted by Graham_Lister on Mon, 06 Feb 2012 16:25 | #

Just a question - a fairly simple one related to a matter mentioned in the thread.

What criterion or criteria should someone employ to distinguish a ‘concern troll’ from someone with a honestly held difference of view or a contrary reading of the evidence/topic at hand?  Add to that, obviously, one would also wish to avoid becoming gripped by the ‘echo-chamber’ effect, yes? The idea that much of the discussion on the internet consists of ‘inwardly directed’ groups of individuals that primarily wish to only hear their own views repeated back to them by others.

OK back on topic sensu stricto.

I’m sure the cardinality of pairwise duels to European history and society is a much under-appreciated and under-researched topic and their re-establishment would be an extraordinary important public-policy priority in any sensible polity.

Unfortunately I am too busy to listen to the interview.


10

Posted by Bugger Off on Mon, 06 Feb 2012 18:06 | #

Excellent show. There’s a personality who combines significant intelligence with a high level of articulation. Robert Stark does well to say little, not a voice for net radio but well meaning. Look forward to the second instalment.


11

Posted by Lurker on Mon, 06 Feb 2012 19:22 | #

Robert Stark also interviewed Tanstaafl recently, worth a listen.


12

Posted by Monroe on Tue, 07 Feb 2012 03:28 | #

“Ivan” is likely a Jew. Probably Israeli with his broken English.

A Circassian Muslim wouldn’t waste his time concern trolling when Jewish issues come up.

In this case, Bowery provides a clear and scientific understanding of the Jewish problem, and this understanding is dangerous to Jewish interests. Hence the nonsensical attack on Bowery, who spoke very clearly for anyone to understand.


13

Posted by Lurker on Tue, 07 Feb 2012 06:09 | #

In this case, Bowery provides a clear and scientific understanding of the Jewish problem, and this understanding is dangerous to Jewish interests. Hence the nonsensical attack on Bowery, who spoke very clearly for anyone to understand.

Indeed so.

 


14

Posted by Ivan on Tue, 07 Feb 2012 07:16 | #

Monroe/marloe, has identified two Jews so far: J Richards and Ivan. Monroe/marloe defends obfuscators like James “Vertical Reality” Bowery, Soren “Billions will die the Jews will win” Renner, Leon “Mises Rothbardovich” Haller and Graham “I am too busy to listen” Lister. Monroe/marloe is not likely a Jew, but if he is, then it is a very special Jew - a stupid one.

Bowery provides a clear and scientific understanding of the Jewish problem, and this understanding is dangerous to Jewish interests.

Could you tell us, in your own words, what is it exactly Bowery has discovered about the Jews that is new and was covered in mist before he discovered it? This Bowery character is a complete joke. 

Perhaps it is no accident that virtual reality dwellers Benner and Rowery work closely together.


15

Posted by anon on Tue, 07 Feb 2012 08:27 | #

Very interesting interview. Keypoints for me:
- virulence as a product of easy horizontal transmission and consequently the need for people to be rooted to a particular piece of ground as a kind of preventative quarantine
- swiss cantons as a good model
- electing local sheriff more important than Prez
- national shells as the enemies of the nations
- internet as way round controls


16

Posted by daniel on Tue, 07 Feb 2012 08:51 | #

Actually that doesn’t make it more clear. Oh well.

Both freely chosen ecologies of the new world and deeply evolved European ecologies made ready for globalist onslaught by county sized political units;

would be a bit more clarifying. But ok

County-sized political units prepare both freely chosen New World ecologies and deeply evolved European ecologies for globalist onslaught.

More like it.

That would be more clear.


17

Posted by Lurker on Tue, 07 Feb 2012 12:34 | #

This Bowery character is a complete joke.

No Ivan, I fear you are the complete joke. James may go off into rarified tangents but his loyalty is not in question. Your snarky sniping otoh only leads me to agree with Monroe all over again.


18

Posted by Ivan on Tue, 07 Feb 2012 20:59 | #

No, no, no ... Lurker, you’ve got it all wrong. A am a Circassian, a lone sniper, a straight shooter, an honest man. Can’t you see it? Are you blind?

The only other man around here with the same set of qualities is J Richards.

Here are a few other men in the same category: Joseph Stalin, William Simpson, Henry Ford, Dr William Pierce, Robert Mathews, Glenn Miller, Will Williams, Scott Hadding. These are very special people with clear minds who genuinely cared/care about something bigger than their mortal selves.


19

Posted by daniel on Tue, 07 Feb 2012 21:15 | #

...seems we’ve got some spamming here. Ivan, are you a muslim?


20

Posted by Ivan on Tue, 07 Feb 2012 22:53 | #

Yes sir, I sure am. Not a very righteous one, to be truthful: I take a shot of vodka occasionally when I get really pissed off by the likes of James and Soren, which is, at least partially, their fault, I shall add. You might guess easily that I am pissed off right now.


21

Posted by Ivan on Tue, 07 Feb 2012 22:58 | #

Spamming is not coming from me - it is coming from those who follow my comments in an attempt to derail my comments. That’s why I am pissed off.


22

Posted by uh on Tue, 07 Feb 2012 23:03 | #

A am a Circassian, a lone sniper, a straight shooter, an honest man. Can’t you see it? Are you blind?

What you are is a self-important little shit. J Richards has unleashed in you a very base turn of your character that you would do best to conceal forever starting now. There is a petty camp commandant lurking in every man, who would lock up his fellows for fictitious faults until he have none left, and one of the requirements of civility is that we agree to keep him under wraps. You and the Bot have failed. Golf clap for “Ivan” the Asshole.


23

Posted by Ivan on Tue, 07 Feb 2012 23:16 | #

uh seems pissed off a bit too. Take a shot of vodka, uh, it helps. And be polite with good people, please. Do not offend them for nothing - it is not good. Be just, uh. That’ll make your life much better.


24

Posted by daniel on Tue, 07 Feb 2012 23:41 | #

I wonder if an appreciation of Stalin (and sympathy with some other dubious characters; which of the list I will not specify) and vigilance against Jews derives of an equiprimordial source in haplogroup G and J2 shared with him, with them and middle-eastern Muslims, as mutated of the Caucuses? This evolution, its mutation in Kazaria, is perhaps a corollary to brutal insanity – but in this more muted expression, angry temperament and empirical vigilance which I will refrain from calling paranoia.

That is to say, it might not be easy to control your temper, Ivan. However, vodka does indeed, strike me as a better outlet than Islam…or Judaism or Christianity for that matter. Stalin is the real deal and Bowery a total fraud – that’s thought provoking. Far out, man.


25

Posted by MOB on Wed, 08 Feb 2012 06:25 | #

I’m afraid Ivan is correct in his comments, both as to James Bowery and to the persons he holds up as models, with the exception of Stalin.

For those who enjoyed the Stark interview (I didn’t, though I fully appreciate the insight into especially the financial behavior of Jews that the horizontal virulence theory provides, and did so when I first read it even prior to 2006 when a Search tells me it was posted here under Heterosity), you’ll recall that Bowery expressed enthusiasm for the potential value to our cause of “Eusociality.”

Here’s a sneak preview:

http://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2008/01/080102083749.htm

http://business.highbeam.com/411908/article-1G1-174239775/one-giant-leap-insects-achieved-altruism-and-colonial

The theme is, as always, promoting the creation of a new elite (it’s in Trainspotter’s Ron Paul article at C-C today, too).

I wonder what, exactly, caused Bowery to stop contributing to MR, completely, and seemingly suddenly.


26

Posted by daniel on Wed, 08 Feb 2012 07:22 | #

Posted by MOB on February 08, 2012, 06:25 AM | # writes:

I’m afraid Ivan is correct in his comments, both as to James Bowery and to the persons he holds up as models, with the exception of Stalin.

I disagree with the assessment of Bowery and about the rest of the list, although I will not specify who among the rest of Ivan’s list is less than exemplary.

I am aware that Bowery has discussed some ideas from the Stark interview here at MR and a while back. This was his first interview with VoR, so it was bound to cover some old ground. It was more redundant in that sense than I personally might have enjoyed as well, but necessary for a new audience. However, he should have opportunity to break new ground and go into more depth in future discussions.

I don’t know why he has not posted here of late. In the interview he said that he basically said what he has to say to MR; that he may post more in the future, but for now, he is satisfied that his posts are fairly self-contained information.


27

Posted by uh on Wed, 08 Feb 2012 10:04 | #

I’m afraid Ivan is correct in his comments, both as to James Bowery and to the persons he holds up as models, with the exception of Stalin.

And you’re a lonely old woman.

did so when I first read it even prior to 2006 when a Search tells me it was posted here under Heterosity

So it’s all right for Soren to pass big ideas off as his own, without expressing them even half-correctly, but it’s suspicious or in poor taste for Bowery to express his own idea on separate occasions and forums, years apart.

I wonder what, exactly, caused Bowery to stop contributing to MR, completely, and seemingly suddenly.

No doubt another crypto-Jew, like everyone else in your cobwebbed brain ... except the Circassian toad and the Bot.

If you have shit to talk about this man, stop squinting out of one eye and making your malicious implications. You and dc and Ivan the toad and J Richards and Crappinchaos and the whole leering lot of you ARE NOT STASI. NO ONE IS ‘INFILTRATING’ THIS BLOG. YOU ARE IMAGINING THINGS AND LOOK FOOLISH.


28

Posted by uh on Wed, 08 Feb 2012 10:06 | #

I don’t know why he has not posted here of late.

lozzolzlz

make one guess, dude.


29

Posted by Thorn on Wed, 08 Feb 2012 10:32 | #

Although James Bowery did a very good job articulating his theories about horizontal and vertical transmission etc. his message is of little value in trying to wake-up the average white.

IOWs, the content of the interview my have a positive reactive value thus resonate well with those of us that are well aware of Jewish Supremacism and its pernicious effects on people of European decent; however, when you present those ideas to the general public, they will invariable view you as someone who has antennas growing out the back of your head. Seriously.

Again, I’m not trying to discredit Bowery, I’m just saying his ideas are almost impossible to sell in the general populace.

PS,

I propose GW set up an interview with Leon Haller on MR Radio. Maybe J Richards can be part of the mix? Maybe a series of interviews?

 

 


30

Posted by uh on Wed, 08 Feb 2012 11:05 | #

Thorn,

I’ve been meaning to ask if you’re the same Thorn at Heartiste?

I propose GW set up an interview with Leon Haller on MR Radio. Maybe J Richards can be part of the mix? Maybe a series of interviews?

Don’t hold your breath. If my diagnosis (ugh) of the Bot is right, he is too paranoid and shy to put himself out in the slightest. Mark my word: The more paranoid a man is, the less real contact they have with others. This is a cliché in psychology, and as much as it embarrasses me to say, the source is nearly always a lack of mothering (physical affection) in childhood. Think about it — what becomes of the child deprived of a mother’s love? Have you ever seen an abused or feral child? How about a stray domestic animal? What’s the dominant trait in their behavior? Everyone is a probable enemy. Contrariwise, the well-loved house cat lolls trustingly on the sidewalk as you pass, almost flirting with you for the affection it has been trained to expect.

The danger is that the paranoid personality, because it has shut out a world that rejected it in childhood, is capable of a deadly efficiency in pursuing its goal, which is to force reality to suit its paranoid psychodrama. For this purpose it makes extensive and superficially cogent use of facts and logic. And of course those most attracted to the performance are other paranoiacs. In contrast the “open” personality — those who have received plenty of affection, and are able to reciprocate it — is shocked to the point of being tongue-tied that people can be so suspicious and hostile according to some preconceived mental pathology. This is, of course, precisely how we react to the psychology of Jews when first we awoke. How can an entire people be so unrealistic, so paranoid of everything?

But there it is. When paranoia becomes pathology, everyone else becomes a “Jew” — or a “Nazi”.


31

Posted by uh on Wed, 08 Feb 2012 11:20 | #

... which is to force reality to suit its paranoid psychodrama.

It ought to go without saying, but doesn’t, that that project is nothing more than overcompensation in trying to control the world by forceful rationalization, perceived as mostly a threat. As survival is a priority of any organism, and evo-psych tells us that the heuristic bias of discrete agency arose in preferring to err on the side of caution to avoid predators, the abandoned animal lives in a continuous state of threat and anxiety, and therefore is capable of interpreting everything as a predator; in a human context this becomes overperception of logical threat to the idiosyncratic symbolic order imposed on phenomena by the anxious (abandoned) mind. In this way it combats the anxiety borne of lacking affection: by precluding it. The paranoiac goes through life as an emotional cripple, thwarted in human development while in swaddling clothes — and misunderstands himself as a superior intelligence.

By the way, PPD (ugh) is actually quite rare. Which just means that most parents do a decent job of socializing their young.

This is what’s really happened at this website. Guessedworker, busy and foreign to programming minutiae, put his trust in a highly capable paranoiac who has run the thing into the ground with his all-consuming suspicion and rotten attitude. Guessedworker trusts J Richards because he holds himself at some quotidian distance from the site, and what he sees is a conscientious and efficient man, not the paranoiac afflicting the free spirited half of the commentariat, encouraging those constricted souls barred from entry to Thélème.


32

Posted by Marlowe's Ghost on Wed, 08 Feb 2012 13:33 | #

Jesus! I see the Heathers are still bitching in every single post even 24 hours later. G-e-t o-v-e-r i-t.


33

Posted by Thorn on Wed, 08 Feb 2012 14:36 | #

Thorn,

I’ve been meaning to ask if you’re the same Thorn at Heartiste?

No, uh.

I see there is a commenter at Heartiste that signs in as Thor, but it isn’t me.

Actually I’ve never heard of Heartiste until you brought it up. It seems like a worthwhile site though.

 


34

Posted by dosto on Wed, 08 Feb 2012 14:40 | #

you’ll recall that Bowery expressed enthusiasm for the potential value to our cause of “Eusociality.”

Bowery has long been against eusociality. That’s partly what his whole single combat thing is about.


35

Posted by Wild Bill on Wed, 08 Feb 2012 16:02 | #

It is really surprising that Bowery did not use this important opportunity to demonstrate his “multi-machine”.
The concept that could re-industrialize the white world…


36

Posted by MP on Wed, 08 Feb 2012 16:43 | #

It is really surprising that Bowery did not use this important opportunity to demonstrate his “multi-machine”.

When did Bowery ever write or talk about a “multi-machine”?

What is the “multi-machine” anyway?


37

Posted by Lurker on Wed, 08 Feb 2012 16:55 | #

I think someone else came up with the ‘multi-machine’. Whatever that is.


38

Posted by Jimmy Marr on Wed, 08 Feb 2012 17:51 | #

What I like about James Bowery’s view, particularly when leavened with renneRian pessimism,  is that the dysgenic effects of civilization are ultimately self-resolving.

“Billions will die. We will win.”

What many nationalists fear and hate about renneR’s aphorism is that it does not racially bind the variable “we”.

“We” could be White, or “we” could be purple, but “we”, by definition, will have vanquished the enemies of God, who, much to the aggravation of nationalists, must also remain racially indeterminate at this point in time.

Nevertheless, they will be risen against.


39

Posted by Ivan on Wed, 08 Feb 2012 18:03 | #

What many nationalists fear and hate about renneR’s aphorism is that it does not racially bind the variable “we”.

“We” is the Jews, stupid!

From the Protocols of New Elders of Zion:

Billions will die. We, the Jews, will win.

The minutes of the Sanhedrin meeting were taken by it’s secretary Søren.


40

Posted by Jimmy Marr on Wed, 08 Feb 2012 18:07 | #

“We” shall see.


41

Posted by Ivan on Wed, 08 Feb 2012 18:17 | #

Yes sir, you shall see.


42

Posted by uh on Wed, 08 Feb 2012 18:45 | #

renneRian pessimism

There is no such thing. You made it up, old boy. One day you must accept it on faith, if not through reason, that everything Renner thinks is original to him simply is not, which is, to say it again, why he cannot even faithfully reproduce a lick of it.

Soren Renner is not a philosopher.

What many nationalists fear and hate about renneR’s aphorism

Are you trying to wind me up?

Number one, no one is fucking afraid of a single word Soren Renner has ever written or said. Get that straight this very second, Jimmy. I don’t know why you’re being such an awful fan-boy but you need to reel it in a bit.

Number two, what we hate about it, as you would know very well by now if you weren’t so damned eager to misinterpret criticisms, is that it exhibits overweening presumption — like every other white nationalist prognostication.

Take Danny boy and me. We say: the food supply must be ____ to ____. Note the different modality in these two sentences:

“Billions will die. We will win.”

“The food supply (among other systems!!) must be ____ to ____.”

One presumes to know with certainty what “will” occur. The other limits itself to asserting what “must” or “ought” to occur if whatever desired outcome is to be achieved.

Soren is a n a r c i s s i s t .  Do you understand what I am saying to you? am I being explicit enough, or will you insist on finding some way to twist what is being said? Really Jimmy, I hold you to a higher standard as a man who has flattered me considerably. By the way, could you snag Gabriella’s # for me?

At the VERY least I never again want to see you or anyone claim “nationalists” are “afraid” of Soren fucking Renner. Shake that idea out of your head right now.

If anyone’s putting fear in the hearts of natis, it’s Daniel and I ... and the Narrator, if you pay attention.

it does not racially bind the variable “we”.

Also, enough of the word-games. To his credit, as an aphorism it is respectably succinct and pellucid, well apart from its truth as an assertion.


43

Posted by Jimmy Marr on Wed, 08 Feb 2012 19:10 | #

Jawohl!


44

Posted by J Richards on Wed, 08 Feb 2012 21:04 | #

Ivan @39

Thanks for saying that “we” in “Billions will die, we will win” is a reference to Jews.  The cryptic messages aren’t difficult to decrypt.  With the recent turn of events I no longer have to hold back. 

One of the Renner Crew, Constantin von Hoffmeister, does this all the time.  Read Constantin’s entry here:

http://majorityrights.com/weblog/comments/empire_of_the_end

Now tell me if my comment there @16 isn’t correct that Constantin basically pisses on us in Jewish contempt for dumb goyim.

And it’s telling that Uh, shamed into abruptly leaving MR, comes back in full force when the heat turns on Renner and, earlier, when the heat turned on Talmudism.


45

Posted by Ivan on Wed, 08 Feb 2012 22:28 | #

Now tell me if my comment there @16 isn’t correct that Constantin basically pisses on us in Jewish contempt for dumb goyim.

You’ve got a pair of those sunglasses, my dear friend. Don’t keep them on for too long - that’ll drive you nuts.

And yes, this pathetic character uh is 100% kosher. There is no doubt about that in my mind.


46

Posted by Ivan on Wed, 08 Feb 2012 22:51 | #

@J Richards

Is there something you can do to suppress spamming comments? There is some clear pattern in the timing of those spam outbursts. It seems to me that their purpose is to make the most damaging comments to scroll down and off the page as quick as possible.


47

Posted by Jimmy Marr on Thu, 09 Feb 2012 00:27 | #

That was a fun video, Ivan.

You never made any comment on that Imran Hosein video I posted last week. Did you miss it, or just not have an opinion?


48

Posted by Ivan on Thu, 09 Feb 2012 22:07 | #

You never made any comment on that Imran Hosein video I posted last week. Did you miss it, or just not have an opinion?

Evidently I missed it, Jimmy. But I’m certain it was a fun video for the following reasons:

(a) I have seen many Imran Hosein videos - he is an interesting personality with good sense of humor, and
(b) You have a knack for picking fun videos. I call your collection Jim’s pick.

My all-time favorite in Jim’s pick collection is exposing a liar french style


49

Posted by daniel on Fri, 10 Feb 2012 09:59 | #

Lara says, Good job

My congratulations to you !

Thank you Lara! (bow). It’s very kind of you

Lara:

I really think so smile



Post a comment:


Name: (required)

Email: (required but not displayed)

URL: (optional)

Note: You should copy your comment to the clipboard or paste it somewhere before submitting it, so that it will not be lost if the session times out.

Remember me


Next entry: Aquilon Speaks: Moscow 2010
Previous entry: The communitarian critique of liberalism left and right

image of the day

Existential Issues

DNA Nations

Establishment Problem

Categories

Links

Endorsement not implied.

Immigration

Islamist Threat

Anti-white Media Networks

Audio/Video

Crime

Economics

Education

General

Historical Re-Evaluation

Controlled Opposition

Nationalist Political Parties

Science

Europeans in Africa

Of Note

Comments

dsc commented in entry 'TRS founder Michael ‘Enoch’ Peinovich was exposed as being a Russian Jew.' on Mon, 16 Jan 2017 21:53. (View)

Jesse commented in entry 'TRS founder Michael ‘Enoch’ Peinovich was exposed as being a Russian Jew.' on Mon, 16 Jan 2017 21:40. (View)

Dart commented in entry 'TRS founder Michael ‘Enoch’ Peinovich was exposed as being a Russian Jew.' on Mon, 16 Jan 2017 19:58. (View)

Kumiko Oumae commented in entry 'TRS founder Michael ‘Enoch’ Peinovich was exposed as being a Russian Jew.' on Mon, 16 Jan 2017 18:24. (View)

AutoSkorzeny commented in entry 'TRS founder Michael ‘Enoch’ Peinovich was exposed as being a Russian Jew.' on Mon, 16 Jan 2017 18:22. (View)

Captainchaos commented in entry 'TRS founder Michael ‘Enoch’ Peinovich was exposed as being a Russian Jew.' on Mon, 16 Jan 2017 18:06. (View)

Dart commented in entry 'TRS founder Michael ‘Enoch’ Peinovich was exposed as being a Russian Jew.' on Mon, 16 Jan 2017 18:05. (View)

Dart commented in entry 'TRS founder Michael ‘Enoch’ Peinovich was exposed as being a Russian Jew.' on Mon, 16 Jan 2017 17:53. (View)

Mathematician commented in entry 'TRS founder Michael ‘Enoch’ Peinovich was exposed as being a Russian Jew.' on Mon, 16 Jan 2017 17:42. (View)

Matt Parrott commented in entry 'TRS founder Michael ‘Enoch’ Peinovich was exposed as being a Russian Jew.' on Mon, 16 Jan 2017 14:23. (View)

Henry commented in entry 'TRS founder Michael ‘Enoch’ Peinovich was exposed as being a Russian Jew.' on Mon, 16 Jan 2017 13:31. (View)

(((Weev))) commented in entry 'TRS founder Michael ‘Enoch’ Peinovich was exposed as being a Russian Jew.' on Mon, 16 Jan 2017 07:47. (View)

(((MikeEnoch Peinovich))) commented in entry 'TRS founder Michael ‘Enoch’ Peinovich was exposed as being a Russian Jew.' on Mon, 16 Jan 2017 07:41. (View)

fuller list: Trump's (((cabal))) courtesy (((JP))) commented in entry 'Trump's Jewish Cabal' on Sun, 15 Jan 2017 08:40. (View)

Trump's stance on Russia & China commented in entry 'The CIA has concluded that Russia intervened in 2016 election to help Trump win the White House' on Sun, 15 Jan 2017 03:00. (View)

Some churches aligned 2return 2natural religion commented in entry 'Solstice in the Deep of European Rebirth' on Sun, 15 Jan 2017 00:08. (View)

Fund the destruction of my family line commented in entry 'WHITE WOMEN FOR SALE!' on Sat, 14 Jan 2017 15:24. (View)

James Bowery commented in entry 'Being in kind – part 1' on Sat, 14 Jan 2017 15:24. (View)

Completion of the Post commented in entry 'Being-Of: Group Identity’s Ontology' on Sat, 14 Jan 2017 10:56. (View)

Ruby advised to keep quiet commented in entry 'We Told You So: Prediction Of Trump's Victory Comes True - By A Hair-Line' on Sat, 14 Jan 2017 04:24. (View)

DanielS commented in entry 'We can no longer allow liberals and brackets to co-opt issues of environment and species diversity' on Sat, 14 Jan 2017 02:32. (View)

Meimou commented in entry 'We can no longer allow liberals and brackets to co-opt issues of environment and species diversity' on Fri, 13 Jan 2017 17:27. (View)

Trump: global warming concept created by Chinese commented in entry 'We can no longer allow liberals and brackets to co-opt issues of environment and species diversity' on Fri, 13 Jan 2017 10:36. (View)

James Bowery commented in entry 'Being in kind – part 1' on Fri, 13 Jan 2017 09:33. (View)

Mair inflamed by his mother's miscegenation commented in entry 'Hate-Crimes: affirmative action for Whites to compensate for over-representation of black crime' on Fri, 13 Jan 2017 05:12. (View)

China Sold High-Speed Trains to Czech commented in entry 'Intermarium Update: 16+1 Summit - China is betting on Central Europe' on Fri, 13 Jan 2017 04:46. (View)

Orban targeting foreign backed NGO's commented in entry 'NGOs are smuggling immigrants into Europe on an industrial scale' on Fri, 13 Jan 2017 04:31. (View)

Captainchaos commented in entry 'Being in kind – part 1' on Fri, 13 Jan 2017 01:54. (View)

James Bowery commented in entry 'Being in kind – part 1' on Thu, 12 Jan 2017 11:51. (View)

Trump's tautologies commented in entry 'Donald Trump wastes 77 minutes of everyone's time.' on Thu, 12 Jan 2017 08:53. (View)

(((Jared Kushner))) Senior Adviser to President commented in entry 'Trump's Cabinet Appointments - The List Updated Until Complete' on Wed, 11 Jan 2017 23:29. (View)

(((David Shulkin))), Secretary of Veterans Affairs commented in entry 'Trump's Cabinet Appointments - The List Updated Until Complete' on Wed, 11 Jan 2017 23:05. (View)

6/12/70 Dock Ellis pitches no-hitter on L.S.D. commented in entry 'It Ain't So, Joe, And Sports Statistics Didn't Stay Objective Despite Your Unjust Banishment' on Wed, 11 Jan 2017 11:50. (View)

Clock Boy Loses in Court commented in entry 'Now Introducing: The Islamic Clock Boy' on Tue, 10 Jan 2017 22:25. (View)

Dylan Roof sentenced to death commented in entry 'Hate-Crimes: affirmative action for Whites to compensate for over-representation of black crime' on Tue, 10 Jan 2017 21:44. (View)

affection-tone