Posted by From Fasci to Hare Krishna hair on Mon, 02 May 2016 16:34 | #

         
From Fasci to Hare Krishna hair ..reverence to a cult daddy must be.

“That he would come was inevitable”

“Win with love for Trump, win with love for Trump”

Posted by Ryan on Mon, 02 May 2016 23:02 | #

As you pointed out if Trump does what he says he does it could just lead to the same situation America had in the early 80’s with Ronald ‘Ray-Gun’ gaining the overtly White vote of the ‘Wallace Democrats’ but in Office not working against the liberal left through the institutions.

In regards to the more pressing issue of Richard Spencer’s Haircut he should go back to his normal rounded haircut he had a few years ago. It was like a quintessential blonde hair American look, the kind of you look you would think of in a classical West Point Graduate or successful individual. The Hitler Youth haircut is really lame, espically on a guy in his mid to late 30’s.

Posted by Tribalists prefer own to popular appeal on Tue, 03 May 2016 09:59 | #

Counter Currents, “What Trump Didn’t Predict”

Gregory Hood       ...observes that “conservatives” are tribalists and don’t want to win so much as they want to maintain their people. Trump didn’t anticipate that.

Posted by Trump's incrementalism on Tue, 03 May 2016 10:12 | #

Assessing Trump’s ‘America First’: Muscular Americentrism Meets Neoconservatism:

Lawrence Murray

Also places less value to White interests in a Trump victory:

Unfortunately, one can see Trump’s attempts to reach out to ((((neocons))))) throughout the policy positions in his speech, which he no doubt had some help with. A genuine America First nationalist foreign policy would be a huge improvement over what we have now. But from the content of Trump’s speech, it seems he is not there 100% and this would be an incremental change rather than a paradigm shift.

[...]

Trump is clearly going to be a transitional figure, not a great sea change. But then he goes and drops a bomb like this:

“No country has ever prospered that failed to put its own interests first. Both our friends and our enemies put their countries above ours and we, while being fair to them, must start doing the same. We will no longer surrender this country or its people to the false song of globalism. The nation-state remains the true foundation for happiness and harmony. I am skeptical of international unions that tie us up and bring America down.”

I want to believe. My bare minimum for Trump has always been whether or not he will do what he says about illegal immigration, not foreign policy—which he is clearly confused on. It would be nice to get a nationalist foreign policy, but it is clear that Trump will not be the one to bring us there yet. His foreign policy seems to be nationalist in rhetoric but largely neoconservative in substance. He still believes in the ideological crusade against foreign states that will yield us few benefits. He puts Israel first in the Middle East rather than the United States first anywhere in any situation. But he is not dumb about what causes terrorism and how to prevent it from happening here. For technical purposes, however, immigration policy can hardly be considered foreign policy. Trump absolutely falls short on foreign policy, regardless of the language he is using to justify it.

Posted by Donald's history with sports cucks on Tue, 03 May 2016 11:22 | #

Donald has been pandering to cuckservative sports fans for a long time. He went so far as to invest in an alternative professional football league to challenge the NFL.

Posted by Selous Scout on Tue, 03 May 2016 17:15 | #

I was at the Costa Mesa event last week and I could have sworn the scene resembled a race war.

Posted by Trump: we are going to love eachother on Wed, 04 May 2016 07:21 | #

The Atlantic, “How Donald Trump Speaks to—and About—Minorities” 3 May 2016:

Does the presumptive Republican nominee see African Americans and Hispanics as part of the American “we”?

Lucas Jackson / Reuters

Celebrating his big win in Indiana—and his elevation to presumptive nominee of the Republican Party—Tuesday night, Donald Trump spoke at Trump Tower in New York City, where he delivered a promise to heal the deep fractures in his party.

“We want to bring unity to the Republican Party,” he said. “We have to bring unity. It’s so much easier if we have it.”

Do Black Votes Matter to Donald Trump?

That will be a tall order. But as a general-election candidate, Trump will need to win over more than just Republicans. In his inimitable way, he pledged to bring together the rest of the nation as well.

“We’re going to bring back our jobs, and we’re going to save our jobs, and people are going to have great jobs again, and this country, which is very, very divided in so many different ways, is going to become one beautiful loving country, and we’re going to love each other, we’re going to cherish each other and take care of each other, and we’re going to have great economic development and we’re not going to let other countries take it away from us, because that’s what’s been happening for far too many years and we’re not going to do it anymore,” he said. (That’s a single sentence, if you’re keeping track at home.)

Trump faces significant obstacles to achieving that unity, particular with blocs that are not white men. Seven in 10 women view him unfavorably. It’s even worse with minorities. A recent Gallup poll found that 77 of Hispanics view Trump unfavorably. A Washington Post poll pegged that number at eight in 10, seven of them “very unfavorable.” An NBC News/Survey Monkey poll found an astonishing 86 percent of African Americans had a negative view of Trump.

One reason for those atrocious ratings is the way Trump speaks to and about minorities, which was on display during his victory speech Tuesday.

“We’re going to have great relationships with the Hispanics,” he said. “The Hispanics have been so incredible to me. They want jobs. Everybody wants jobs. The African Americans want jobs. If you look at what’s going on, they want jobs.”

Part of Trump’s rhetorical power is his supercharged used of “we,” a method that persuades people across the country that they are part of a larger movement, and somehow share with Trump his aura of wealthy and luxury. (It’s the same technique he’s used to sell real estate for years.) In the midst of his spiel about all the ways “we” would make America great again, Trump tossed in this passage about minorities.

His phrasing is telling. First, it suggests that for Trump, blacks and Hispanics aren’t part of “we”—“they” constitute separate groups. Perhaps that’s an accidental, unthinking division, but subconscious racial division is no less dangerous. Second, it shows him assuming that minority concerns can be reduced to economics. That view is perhaps unsurprising for a man who has spent his career trying to accumulate wealth, but it is a two-dimensional view of black and Hispanic Americans.

The fact that his policies simply don’t line up with what most African Americans want in a president is one reason his numbers with black voters are so bad. Another factor is a presidential campaign driven in large parts by divisive appeals to racism and bigotry against Hispanics, Muslims, and other groups. Trump also has a long history of racially charged incidents, from alleged tenant discrimination to his strident reaction to the Central Park Five.

The entertainer has long spoken about minority groups with the outdated formulation involving a definite article: “I have a great relationship with the blacks. I’ve always had a great relationship with the blacks,” he said in 2011, using language that undermined his claim. He’s said similar things about “the Hispanics.”

Changing the way Trump speaks about African Americans and Hispanics won’t solve his problems with those groups, but if he wishes to unify the country, beginning to speak about them as though they are part of the American populace would be a good place to start.

Way to go right-wingers. As usual, the real Republican men are too rational to see race…these men are color blind, love everybody.

Posted by anon on Sat, 07 May 2016 09:27 | #

Trump creates a great opportunity to red pill people.

Posted by intelligent remarks by Marty calling WWS on Mon, 09 May 2016 09:16 | #

Intelligent observations on Trump and other matters by a man named Marty calling into Wolf Wallstreet’s “Talk Shoe Fourth Position.”

“I’m sure that Trump is worm-holed with dirty deals and dirty money. Maybe I mentioned this before, but I did hear that one of the reasons for the casino boom in Atlantic City in the late 70’s and in the 80’s and that includes Trump, was to launder the cocaine money from Latin America. And so, as you said, Trump is no man on a white horse.

And it appears that The Republican Party, the power, the controllers of The Republican Party have laid down; they’ve bowed to the inevitability of a Trump candidacy; and I’m a little bit suspicious about this laying down; I think that they’ve changed their tactics; they’ve changed their strategy and their going to stay in power. I don’t think Trump is gonna’ do any house cleaning.

Trump is just one man and he is absolutely surrounded by the enemy. All three of his adult children are married to Jews; he’s thoroughly embedded in the Jewish network, Jewish power structure, so, I’m not sure what we should expect of Trump.”

“The White elites lost their ass because they got in bed with the Jews. They didn’t protect their yeomanry, their White yeomanry, they used White people like cattle - like peasantry. And so they lost. The White elite doesn’t understand that it’s security depends upon a robust White working class. The White working class is where their management comes from, it’s where their police forces come from, it’s where their military comes from and it’s where productive industry is rooted.

If you throw your White working class to the wolves, which is what the White elite has done, they’re gonna go down, any elite that does that… we see history in the last hundred years, starting with the Federal Reserve, and the entry of the U.S. elites, allowed The United States to get into World War I and they jumped into World War II, because the profits were absolutely enormous, but in doing-so, in getting rich, they destroyed the White peasantry and so they’re gonna go down.. and a lot of them are intermarried with Jews anyway. They’re just disappearing. The White elite are just breeding-out, bleeding-out and breeding out.

For Whites now, the key is infiltration by ghost wolves of the security services, and skilled guerrilla resistance on the peripheries of major urban centers… (to cut-off supplies and create rioting) ...the Richmond - Boston corridor is an important region; and it is vulnerable.

Posted by mass fight: blacks / Mexicans in L.A. highschool on Thu, 12 May 2016 23:54 | #

Mass fighting between blacks fighting Mexicans in Los Angeles High School

Posted by Stoke that division on Fri, 27 May 2016 05:16 | #

Violence breaks out at ANOTHER Trump rally: Now Anaheim demonstrators burn trash cans and throw objects at police hours after The Donald slammed New Mexico protesters as ‘thugs and criminals’

  Five people were arrested in the Californian city on Wednesday afternoon
  Protesters were throwing objects, some trash cans were set alight
  It was all around Donald Trump’s midday rally at a convention center
  And it came just a day after violence in Albuquerque at his event

Posted by stuff black people don't like on Tue, 07 Jun 2016 17:12 | #

Not My Fellow Americans...
In the most horrific nightmares, one would be hard-pressed to come up with a more terrifying scenario than what black people have done to Trenton, New Jersey. If half of what is reported in this story is true, the war zone blacks have created in Trenton makes Brian Keene’s The Rising seem angelic in comparison. [Trenton residents reach breaking point with violence and urge officials to act, The Trentonian News, June 2, 2016.

Sunday, June 5, 2016
Michael Jackson, Whitney Houston, Prince, Muhammad Ali
    ... Who We are Forced to Canonize in Death Shows America is Irredeemable