Jay & Gay Many readers will have already come across this famous statement by John Jay on the founding of the US:
Jay was a founding father of America who became the first Chief Justice of the US Supreme Court. In what he writes above, he is entirely at odds with both the modern left-wing emphasis on multiculturalism and diversity, and the right-wing ideal of a nation founded purely on common political values. Instead, he finds it important - even to the point of seeing it as religiously providential - that the US was founded with a unity of both people and place. In other words, a nation is justified in its existence when it consists of one connected land forming a home to one connected people. If we jump forward a century from 1788 to the 1890s, we find that it was Australia’s turn to debate the issue of federation. One of the most important advocates for Australian federation was the poet William Gay. His most famous contribution was the following poem, in which he attacks the customs houses on the colonial borders as representing a divisive greed and selfishness.
This poem was quoted by the leading politician of the age, Alfred Deakin, a future Prime Minister, to launch the case for federation in Victoria in 1898. What strikes me about the poem is how similar it is in basic philosophy to the thoughts of John Jay. Again, what is stressed is the idea that God has given one connected land to one connected people, and that this is the basis of national life, national purpose and national responsibility. So never let anyone claim that the idea of traditional nationalism has not had a respectable place within the English-speaking political tradition. It is there in John Jay, and it is there in a different country and a different century in the words of William Gay. Comments:2
Posted by James Bowery on Tue, 22 Nov 2005 17:10 | #
So Even Henri Joly de lLotbiniere would have had no problem with ethnostates. 3
Posted by Desmond Jones on Tue, 22 Nov 2005 20:36 | # Read it with sarcasm mode on Ventris-it’s tongue in cheek-“By its lack of consistence - an image without substance - the rainbow would represent aptly the solidity of our Confederation.”-not. 4
Posted by AD on Wed, 23 Nov 2005 11:06 | # Off topic hawking(not on my behalf): Any Aussies interested in what went on at the Sydney Forum can now get the 3 volume DVD set of the event. Copies are available for $40 + $2 postage(send cheque / money order paid to Sydney Forum at P.O. Box N291 Grosvenor Place 1220). I’m yet to see it but it should be a fun watch.Alot more effort was put into making sure the DVDs were top notch than the place-holder website i’m sure. Post a comment:
Next entry: MR mkII
|
|
Existential IssuesDNA NationsCategoriesContributorsEach author's name links to a list of all articles posted by the writer. LinksEndorsement not implied. Immigration
Islamist Threat
Anti-white Media Networks Audio/Video
Crime
Economics
Education General
Historical Re-Evaluation Controlled Opposition
Nationalist Political Parties
Science Europeans in Africa
Of Note MR Central & News— CENTRAL— An Ancient Race In The Myths Of Time by James Bowery on Wednesday, 21 August 2024 15:26. (View) Slaying The Dragon by James Bowery on Monday, 05 August 2024 15:32. (View) The legacy of Southport by Guessedworker on Friday, 02 August 2024 07:34. (View) Ukraine, Israel, Taiwan … defend or desert by Guessedworker on Sunday, 14 April 2024 10:34. (View) — NEWS — Farage only goes down on one knee. by Guessedworker on Saturday, 29 June 2024 06:55. (View) |
Posted by Ventris on Tue, 22 Nov 2005 14:25 | #
Contrast the above with the comments of this eager French Canadian statesman during the Confederational debates of the 1860’s, entirely consistent with our modern ethos:
“I propose the adoption of the rainbow as our emblem. By the endless variety of its tints the rainbow will give an excellent idea of the diversity of races, religions, sentiments, and interests of the different parts of the Confederation. By its slender and elongated form the rainbow would afford a perfect representation of the geographical configuration of the Confederation. By its lack of consistence - an image without substance - the rainbow would represent aptly the solidity of our Confederation. An emblem we must have, for every great empire has one; let us adopt the rainbow.”
-Henri Joly de Lotbiniere, legislative assembly of Canada, 20 Feb. 1865