Is Ducks Unlimited Sowing the Seeds for the next Holocaust?

Posted by Dasein on Thursday, 28 January 2010 17:22.

In a remarkable op-ed piece in the Jerusalem Post, Hawaiian Jew Sydney Ross Singer asks ‘Are Jews an invasive species?’ 

According to Singer, the study of invasive species began as ‘Nazi science’ and he considers the theory a biological threat to Jews, similar to how Auster considers Darwinism a threat to Jews. 

There is a new biological threat to Jews around the world that has the potential for mass destruction of life. It is not in the form of a disease or mutation. This biological threat comes in the form of a theory.

...

The theory is called invasion biology. It started with the Nazis, and it now dominates environmentalism worldwide. It extols the “native” and exterminates the “alien.” It seeks to purify the environment of the unwanted and destructive influence of “invasive species.” As with eugenics, it passes judgment on the value of others and whether or not they should be allowed to live, or be eradicated. In this case, the “others” are plants and animals.

His conclusion is the following:

Surely, there is a time and place for weeding, selecting and controlling species and people. But we must reject the very notion that some species should be eradicated simply because they are not “native.” In human affairs we call this ethnic cleansing and genocide, and we have seen how ugly it is. It is no less ugly when unleashed on a plant or animal, its seeds of intolerance and hatred lying dormant for the next Holocaust.

If one looks at Ducks Unlimited’s entry on its first ‘Invasive Species of Concern’ (purple loosestrife), one can imagine how a paranoid tribalist might reach such a bold conclusion:

Purple loosestrife is an aggressive exotic plant species that commonly invades North American
wetlands. Under certain moist soil conditions, purple loosestrife may outcompete native vegetation
reducing the availability of important waterfowl food sources and cover types. Eradication
is difficult but if detected early, the spread and impact of purple loosestrife can be minimized.
Extended flooding during late spring may exterminate loosestrife plants but seeds often remain
viable in the soil for long periods of time. However, reducing native plant species composition
may result from extended periods of flooding. EPA approved herbicides such as Roundup (Reg.
No. 524-343) are most effective against purple loosestrife, however annual application is needed
to ensure eradication. Plants should be sprayed when flowering, but before setting seed. Check
local, state and federal regulations prior to applying any herbicides within a body of water. Biological
control programs, notably the introduction of two leaf-eating beetles and a root boring weevil
from Europe, have gained popularity in recent years and appear to be an effective measure of
control.

“Yeah, right… ‘Roundup.’  So that’s what you guys call it this time around.  Not a very subtle name, that!”

But Singer’s right to be concerned.  Any attempt to understand Jewish influence must do so within the context of human ecology, as James has stressed, and defensible analogies (parasite and invasive species) are not flattering.  The obvious conclusion is that Jews should be separated from the White human ecology.  Singer’s conclusion, however, is that the concept of invasive species itself should be demonized (just as Auster demonizes Darwinism).  Chutzpah is not compatible with the scientific method.  Whatever the philosophical foundations for a coming age of European Man will be, it will be built over the rubble of the anti-scientific foundations of the existing liberal order.

Tags:



Comments:


1

Posted by danielj on Thu, 28 Jan 2010 18:39 | #

In human affairs we call this ethnic cleansing and genocide, and we have seen how ugly it is.

Or we call it more accurately: repelling an invasion, self-defense, community protection, antibiotics, etc.


2

Posted by Dasein on Thu, 28 Jan 2010 18:51 | #

This is a paragraph from a section titled ‘Genetic Pollution’ in the Wikipedia entry for invasive species:

Natural, wild species can be threatened with extinction[35] through the process of genetic pollution. Genetic pollution is uncontrolled hybridization and introgression which leads to homogenization or replacement of local genotypes as a result of either a numerical or fitness advantage of the introduced species.[36] Genetic pollution can bring about a form of extinction either through purposeful introduction or through habitat modification, bringing previously isolated species into contact. These phenomena can be especially detrimental for rare species coming into contact with more abundant ones where the abundant ones can interbreed with them, creating hybrids and swamping the entire rarer gene pool, thus driving the native species to extinction. Attention has to be focused on the extent of this problem, it is not always apparent from morphological observations alone. Some degree of gene flow may be a normal, evolutionarily constructive process, and all constellations of genes and genotypes cannot be preserved. However, hybridization with or without introgression may, nevertheless, threaten a rare species’ existence.[37][38]

Now will any conservationist be brave enough to apply this concern to the human species (and include Europeans)?  It would be interesting to contact conservation groups and ask them for their position on the preservation of Europeans.  Maybe it’s been done already.  Does anyone know?  It would be good to get any genocidal beliefs on record.


3

Posted by Desmond Jones on Thu, 28 Jan 2010 19:12 | #

The reaction will depend upon how well it serves capital. The South American water primrose – Ludwigia grandiflora is ill serving of capital resources and thus targeted for control/elimination. However, Crown Vetch (Coronilla varia) serves capital well and though highly invasive and destructive of native species it receives little attention.


4

Posted by cladrastis on Thu, 28 Jan 2010 20:25 | #

Maybe this Singer fella’s onto something (and it may not be a coincidence that he hails from HI).  My concern about invasive species certainly preceded my awareness of the effects of “people of the Jewish race” on their host populations.  And Jews characteristically disrupt indigenous human ecologies for their own benefit by redirecting the flow of nutrients and energy.  They choke out competitors, reproduce prolifically, and predispose the entire ecology to further invasions. 

I still prefer JB’s theory of Jewish virulence (as the solution is something other than uprooting and exterminating the invaders).

A bit ironically, in the UK the native plant “nuts” are paranoid not only about whether they are using native species, but also about whether the provenance of their vegetative material is “of local origin” (i.e. from that particular region or island).  Go figure.


5

Posted by vo on Fri, 29 Jan 2010 14:16 | #

“Chutzpah is not compatible with the scientific method.”

http://www.brandonbeltz.com/scimeth/vocabulary.htm
   
    Problem -
    Observation -
    Hypothesis -
    Experiment -
    Conclusion -
    Variable -

    POHEC - The mnemonic device used to help you remember the steps of the scientific method.

While this isn’t the mnemonic I learned at age 12, I believe there is plenty of room for chutzpah within scientific methodology. Easily could be wrong. The conclusional theory may not be compatible with anxiousness, determined action, balls, guts or whatever chutzpah means.


6

Posted by Dasein on Fri, 29 Jan 2010 16:22 | #

vo, I think you are right, my understanding of chutzpah was perhaps too restricted to the pejorative to make such a bold statement.  If it were to mean shameless exaggeration or misrepresentation, then there would be a problem (e.g. with reproducibility).  If it’s just audacity or shamelessness, but not in a dishonest form, then it’s not necessarily incompatible.


7

Posted by Dan Dare on Fri, 29 Jan 2010 17:12 | #

Perhaps the answer will be for future Europeans to be sheltered in the equivalent of present-day wildfile preserves or perhaps tribal reservations as are common in North America.

I recall once on a trip to Arizona staying on a Hopi reservation (in a motel) and attempting to visit a nearby village. The entrance to village had a sign “Keep Out White Visitors, You are Unwelcome”.


8

Posted by Jupiter on Sat, 30 Jan 2010 14:40 | #

Removing a large hostile popualtion of nonwhites is justifiable. Call it self defense. Either they are removed or they will remove NATIVE BORN WHITE AMERICANS. Why does the trust fund kid Auster have a problem with this? NATIVE BORN WHITE AMERICANS have already been removed by nonwhite alien invaders in California. NATIVE BORN WHITE AMERICANS are facing twilight in at least five other states.

Singer has taken a big beating by his fellow philosophers. In partucular, philospher and animal rights activist Tom Regan has torn his Utilitarianism to shreds in the philosophy journals over the years.

Conservation biologist-Michael Soule specifically despises the nutty animal rights acgivists and their nutty morality. He sees them as a major threat to biodiversity.

Petr Singer is a fucking rertard. I would say to his face.

Hispanics,asians,muslims and africans are a alien species invaders-colonizers in America. Thy pose a mortal threat to the continued long term existence of NATIVE BORN WHITE AMERICANS.

Eventually, NATIVE BORN WHITE AMERICANS will wake up and throw out the non-white invasive species.


9

Posted by Dasein on Sun, 31 Jan 2010 16:17 | #

The entrance to village had a sign “Keep Out White Visitors, You are Unwelcome”.

Whites are perhaps the only people who would respect such a sign.


10

Posted by Desmind Jones on Sun, 31 Jan 2010 18:34 | #

Whites are perhaps the only people who would respect such a sign.

The coloreds use to respect such signs.


11

Posted by Kievsky on Mon, 01 Feb 2010 10:02 | #

Jewish mass media has been a penicillin against the White organism, but we are developing into supergerms. Watch the video with the hot science babe here, we are MRSA, and the Jews mass media is penicillin:

http://evolution.berkeley.edu/evolibrary/news/080401_mrsa


12

Posted by Dasein on Mon, 01 Feb 2010 17:36 | #

The other thing that spells that is letting women vote without first putting a few simple, extremely important, iron-clad-and-unalterable-by-any-means constitutional protections in place, protections for your race and nation so women voters can’t fuck them both completely up.  The Jews can’t pull the crap they pull without allies “on the inside.” Euro women voters are their biggest allies.—Fred Scrooby

Princess Diana was typical of the ‘clueless women voters’ that Fred often writes about.

Mr Julius said the Princess made the comment to express her empathy with him as a Jew. The claim is made in the lawyer’s new book about anti-Semitism.

He writes: “She was interested in Jews but had no idea about them, save that Jewish men (she had heard) were more likely than the men of her own class and background to treat women decently. She was happy to take Jews to be hostile to everything to which she herself was hostile. She once said to me that she should never have married into a German family.”

...

“She was very receptive to new experiences, which meant that she was sometimes taken by odd fancies. She had a strong desire to please, to leave her interlocutor happy, but often without quite understanding what that person was ‘about’.

...

He adds: “She was interested in everything that was outside her own world; she had a tendency to esteem a thing just because it was not part of her world — even more if it was excluded by her world. She herself was not quite of that world, but did not belong to any other either.

http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/newstopics/theroyalfamily/7115410/Princess-Diana-regretted-marrying-into-German-family.html


13

Posted by Desmond Jones on Mon, 01 Feb 2010 19:05 | #

Euro women voters are their biggest allies.—Fred Scrooby

Historically, it has not been the case. Why deny the daughters of the founding Americans the right to vote when Negro men, Jews and Catholics long had the right to vote?

.html


14

Posted by Fred Scrooby on Mon, 01 Feb 2010 19:50 | #

“Why deny the daughters of the founding Americans the right to vote when Negro men, Jews and Catholics long had the right to vote?”  (—Desmond)

Because they vote for the Negroes, Jews, and Catholics.


15

Posted by Desmond Jones on Mon, 01 Feb 2010 19:57 | #

Because they vote for the Negroes, Jews, and Catholics.

Where’s the evidence that WKKK voted for the above?


16

Posted by Fred Scrooby on Mon, 01 Feb 2010 20:08 | #

Most of the ones I’m talking about aren’t in the KKK ladies’ auxilliary, Desmond.  But you’re right, if they present their KKK card at the door of the polling station they should be allowed to vote.


17

Posted by Desmond Jones on Mon, 01 Feb 2010 20:27 | #

You’re blowing smoke Fred and I can see it. Did white women, as a majority, vote for Obama?


18

Posted by Fred Scrooby on Mon, 01 Feb 2010 20:45 | #

Exit polling has no bearing on my point, Desmond, as the party platforms and the parties’ choices of candidate are already skewed by the fact of having to please that half of voters who are women.  Were men voters all they had to please, both platforms and candidates would be more congenial to the preservation of nation and race.  The women’s franchise affects the elections way before Election Day by making everything that wants to have a prayer of winning effeminate-friendly.  The nation-state and the race aren’t effeminate-friendly.


19

Posted by Desmond Jones on Mon, 01 Feb 2010 20:54 | #

Fred, you’re shifting the goal posts.

“Why deny the daughters of the founding Americans the right to vote when Negro men, Jews and Catholics long had the right to vote?” (—Desmond)

Because they vote for the Negroes, Jews, and Catholics…Fred

White women, in the majority, contrary to your assertion, did not vote for a Negro in the 2008 US Presidential election.


20

Posted by Dan Dare on Mon, 01 Feb 2010 21:18 | #

Interesting to learn from the Telegraph article that Anthony Julius’ new book Trials of the Diaspora has finally been published.  I shall look forward to reading it.

Julius has made something of a second career out of documenting English anti-semitism, earlier pieces already on file include this one on TS Eliot and this one also in the Guardian. A brief extract serves to give the flavour:


... Jews born in this country quickly learn how to identify its distinctive anti-semitism, notwithstanding that it tends to be an elusive, low-key affair. It is perhaps best understood as an anti-semitism of minor, uneven constraint on Jewish ambition and self-esteem.

It can be demoralising; it is often dismissive; it is usually covert. In English society, anti-semitism is something that Jews more often overhear than are confronted by. Its challenges tend to be oblique, subtle, somewhat insidious. Jews are encouraged to accept that they have certain skills, certain talents, that are not quite consistent with an ideal conception of what it is to be English. This anti-semitism is consistent, then, with a rhetoric of false praise: Jews are admired for their superior acumen and industry, for their communal cohesiveness, and for being influential beyond their numbers.


It’s quite remarkable that someone who has done so well, professionally and financially, out of his sojourn in a country should be so open in his churlishness.


21

Posted by Lurker on Mon, 01 Feb 2010 21:35 | #

White women, in the majority, contrary to your assertion, did not vote for a Negro in the 2008 US Presidential election.

Would it be fair to say that white women were more likely to vote for Obama than white men?


22

Posted by Fred Scrooby on Mon, 01 Feb 2010 21:37 | #

“White women, in the majority, contrary to your assertion, did not vote for a Negro in the 2008 US Presidential election.”  (—Desmond)

In any election, white women’s eligibilty to vote predetermines what type of men will be chosen as candidates (do you think a Tony Blair, a Pierre Trudeau, or a Bill Clinton would have been selected as candidates if the franchise were limited to men?) and predetermines what type of party platform will be permissible, even thinkable.  Women’s eligibilty to vote predetermines — and severely curtails — the range of choice that the political process will offer to the public on Election Day.  In other words, an entire range of political opinion and an entire species of candidate are excluded from consideration before the election is held.  Of that which remains after this “vetting by women” in effect, the public, including men, is asked to vote yea or nay. 

In Communist countries you had your choice of candidate as long as he was a communist.  It’s the same thing here:  in “women’s-franchise reality” you have your choice of candidate as long as he is clueless-women-friendly, in other words as long as he steers clear of anything that might smack of race or nation-state preservation.

The anti-racist, anti-nation-state fix is in before the election is even held.


23

Posted by ZSIDOZAS on Tue, 02 Feb 2010 00:26 | #

Many ‘anti-Semitic’ writers have noted time and time again how Jews are indeed an invasive species in a bio-sociological sense.

I wrote about this topic last July:

Ashkenazi Jews are only able to outcompete non-Jews (especially Whites) in the competition for resources because they are an ‘invasive species’ that are able to super-thrive in cultures (especially White cultures) which have not evolved the necessary defenses to contain them. Jews do not compete fairly…they utilize Jewish ethnic networking as well as other collective ethnically Jewish strategies while discouraging other groups (especially Whites) from using those same strategies. if Whites ever tried to start using White-forms of ethnic networking, Jews would be leading the charge to ban such “racist” behavior, screaming “discrimination!” to the high-heavens.  Jews could never thrive or succeed in other similarly collective cultures like those found in the Near East or Asia…this is because those collective Asian cultures can effectively contain Jews with similar counter-strategies. Jews only succeed in White cultures because Whites are so naturally individualistic, atomized, and non-collectivistic – thus very unorganized on a macro-racial level. White collectivism/White cooperationism (AKA White nationalism) as well as anti-Semitism are healthy, natural, and even instinctive reactions by Whites who seek to check the rampant and uncontrolled growth of the Jewish ‘invasive species.’
...
In evolutionary (Darwinian) terms, Jews can be seen as a kind of ‘invasive species’ in Europe (which they are not native to). As you know, ‘invasive species’ are those which enter or are unnaturally introduced in to an environment they are not native to and thus are able to ‘run rampant’ over virtually everything because there are no naturally evolved checks in the new environment to stop or prevent them from doing so. A good example of this is the kudzu plant in the Southern USA – it is a plant which is native to Asia and was (unfortunately) introduced in the Southern USA a while back and has now colonized large portions of the Southern landscape; it grows uncontrollably there and as such chokes out/kills many of the native plant species which have not yet had time to evolve any adequate natural defenses against it. See: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kudzu#Ecological_invasion

White Europeans evolved without Jews around, and thus when Jews eventually went to (invaded/colonized) Europe the native White Europeans did not have any natural evolutionary defenses against this ‘invasive species’ – as a result Jews were able to run roughshod over White Europeans (i.e., a native subspecies being ‘choked’ by an invasive one) and became disproportionately intelligent (and thus wealthy/influential). Ashkenazi Jews actually evolved above-average intelligence/cunning while in Europe to try and outwit the native White Europeans in the competition for resources – Jews evolved intelligence to try and succeed in the alien European environment, while Europeans evolved so-called “anti-Semitism” as a reaction against the Jewish ‘invasive species.’

As is now evident, when Jews are born and raised in their own native country (Israel) their intelligence levels begin to returns to more normalized levels over a couple generations. Just notice that Jews are not at all as successful in the Near East as they have been in Europe or the USA; this is of course because they are native to the Near East (i.e., they are not an ‘invasive species’ there) and thus are evolutionarily ‘kept in check’ by their fellow Near Eastern Semites who are evolutionarily prepared to deal with them.


24

Posted by Desmond Jones on Tue, 02 Feb 2010 00:41 | #

Would it be fair to say that white women were more likely to vote for Obama than white men?

In some cases the answer is as likely if not more so.

http://www.cnn.com/ELECTION/2008/results/polls/#FLP00p1


25

Posted by Fred Scrooby on Tue, 02 Feb 2010 00:42 | #

Excellent analysis above by Zsidozas.


26

Posted by Al Ross on Tue, 02 Feb 2010 07:49 | #

Splendid to hear the usual good sense from Zsidozas.


27

Posted by Heavy Heath on Fri, 05 Feb 2010 09:20 | #

Invasive species?

This would be a good meme to put into circulation amongst liberal enviromentalist Whites with regard to the threat from Mestizos!

(they have already taken over and destroyed California and are now moving up the Pacific Northwest!  Time to join Jared Taylor and the White Nationalists and put a stop to it.  Might join forces with other Pacific Northwest types as well… armed Tea Partiers and Militia-men.  We are not girly-men like the Mestizos are used to down in California and San Francisco cool smirk  )



Post a comment:


Name: (required)

Email: (required but not displayed)

URL: (optional)

Note: You should copy your comment to the clipboard or paste it somewhere before submitting it, so that it will not be lost if the session times out.

Remember me


Next entry: Harrison Bergeron
Previous entry: The BNP, the EHRC, and revealing a historical moment

image of the day

Existential Issues

DNA Nations

Establishment Problem

Categories

Links

Endorsement not implied.

Immigration

Islamist Threat

Anti-white Media Networks

Audio/Video

Crime

Economics

Education

General

Historical Re-Evaluation

Controlled Opposition

Nationalist Political Parties

Science

Europeans in Africa

Of Note

Comments

Kamchatka Penninsula commented in entry 'Tillerson, Putin, Sakhalin, Fukushima: Why would Japan Hate Trump's outreach to Russian Federation?' on Sun, 26 Mar 2017 13:18. (View)

Whales from Wales commented in entry 'Terror in Westminster and the official lies which follow' on Sun, 26 Mar 2017 02:36. (View)

Out of the woodpile commented in entry 'Terror in Westminster and the official lies which follow' on Sun, 26 Mar 2017 01:56. (View)

..his wife and daughters commented in entry 'Terror in Westminster and the official lies which follow' on Sun, 26 Mar 2017 01:20. (View)

Khalid Masood Mulatto commented in entry 'Terror in Westminster and the official lies which follow' on Sun, 26 Mar 2017 01:03. (View)

John Peel branches off commented in entry 'Pursuit of Authentic "Soul" Takes Wrong Turn From White Soul: Eat It - Humble Pie & Black Coffee' on Sat, 25 Mar 2017 23:59. (View)

SA White genocide in gear commented in entry 'Suidlanders Reach out to Americans to Stop South African White Genocide' on Sat, 25 Mar 2017 12:45. (View)

Wild Kamchatka commented in entry 'Tillerson, Putin, Sakhalin, Fukushima: Why would Japan Hate Trump's outreach to Russian Federation?' on Sat, 25 Mar 2017 12:22. (View)

Guess who really did it? commented in entry 'Coerced Confessions of The Central Park Five' on Sat, 25 Mar 2017 10:30. (View)

Colored Islam commented in entry 'Terror in Westminster and the official lies which follow' on Sat, 25 Mar 2017 07:04. (View)

It happens to Whites too: Norfolk Four commented in entry 'Coerced Confessions of The Central Park Five' on Sat, 25 Mar 2017 06:18. (View)

Craig Cobb's new digs commented in entry '"Welcome to Leith" - A Review' on Sat, 25 Mar 2017 05:17. (View)

Perhaps a Sallis type commented in entry 'Women Without Class' on Fri, 24 Mar 2017 20:58. (View)

London Mayor's shocking omission commented in entry 'Terror in Westminster and the official lies which follow' on Fri, 24 Mar 2017 20:36. (View)

Canada passes Islamophobia motion commented in entry 'Terror in Westminster and the official lies which follow' on Fri, 24 Mar 2017 19:27. (View)

Cindy commented in entry 'Were the original Indo-Europeans from Europe, Asia or India?' on Thu, 23 Mar 2017 10:05. (View)

Tillerson: my wife made me do this commented in entry 'Tillerson, Putin, Sakhalin, Fukushima: Why would Japan Hate Trump's outreach to Russian Federation?' on Thu, 23 Mar 2017 03:41. (View)

Is Sylvain Mirochnikoff ((()))? commented in entry 'Dickenhorst Farm Cash Cow' on Wed, 22 Mar 2017 22:05. (View)

Yes, evidently Rebekah (((is))) commented in entry 'Dickenhorst Farm Cash Cow' on Wed, 22 Mar 2017 20:20. (View)

Robert Mercer on Civil Rights Act of 1964 commented in entry 'Women Without Class' on Wed, 22 Mar 2017 19:55. (View)

Is Rebekah Mercer ((())) ? commented in entry 'Dickenhorst Farm Cash Cow' on Wed, 22 Mar 2017 19:48. (View)

Jane Mayer: Mercer, Dark Money, Bannon.. commented in entry 'Dickenhorst Farm Cash Cow' on Wed, 22 Mar 2017 19:06. (View)

DanielS commented in entry 'Dickenhorst Farm Cash Cow' on Wed, 22 Mar 2017 08:48. (View)

Kumiko Oumae commented in entry 'Dickenhorst Farm Cash Cow' on Wed, 22 Mar 2017 08:12. (View)

DanielS commented in entry 'Dickenhorst Farm Cash Cow' on Wed, 22 Mar 2017 07:51. (View)

Kumiko Oumae commented in entry 'Dickenhorst Farm Cash Cow' on Wed, 22 Mar 2017 07:45. (View)

Sharon Stone's X commented in entry 'On The Regnery Circus Big-Tent-O-Sphere, Featuring Richard Spencer as its Ring-Master' on Wed, 22 Mar 2017 07:26. (View)

Guessedworker commented in entry 'The daunting task of policing in Sweden.' on Wed, 22 Mar 2017 02:40. (View)

DanielS commented in entry 'Brett Stevens: Not just a Government Issue Patriotard, but a Full-Blown ZOG Disinformation Agent' on Tue, 21 Mar 2017 00:09. (View)

DanielS commented in entry 'Brett Stevens: Not just a Government Issue Patriotard, but a Full-Blown ZOG Disinformation Agent' on Mon, 20 Mar 2017 20:13. (View)

Kumiko Oumae commented in entry 'Bold and Brash Intelligence: Examining Geert Wilders and the PVV in the Netherlands.' on Sun, 19 Mar 2017 22:42. (View)

Geert Wilders suspicious relationship with Israel commented in entry 'Bold and Brash Intelligence: Examining Geert Wilders and the PVV in the Netherlands.' on Sun, 19 Mar 2017 20:36. (View)

Government issue children commented in entry 'Poland: Europe's Vanguard Nation - accepted just 0.21 asylum-seekers per 1000 citizens last year' on Sun, 19 Mar 2017 20:23. (View)

Hungary's 'border hunters' ready for action commented in entry 'V. Orbán: “Hungary is in a State of Siege”' on Sun, 19 Mar 2017 11:52. (View)

Poor Richard Partnership / Dickenhorst Farms commented in entry 'On The Regnery Circus Big-Tent-O-Sphere, Featuring Richard Spencer as its Ring-Master' on Sun, 19 Mar 2017 11:13. (View)

affection-tone