Joyce & Langdon of TOO again show “liberal” functions well in place of “left” as our negative term Way down in the profound gears of ship’s engine room, we were given the shaft: YKW misdirection of “left” as our enemy as opposed to potential utility of a White Left - unionization of Whites against liberalism come by any means, Jews or otherwise. Andrew Joyce demonstrates that as opposed to “the left”, the more descriptive and useful term for what our enemies are prescribing for us - viz. liberalism - can be used with perfect coherence. He even alludes to the profound significance of it by article’s end - likening the matter of our course as directed by Jewish interests and their liberal minions to an issue way down in the engine-room of the ship - the implicit matter of “liberalism” as the prescription of the enemy as opposed to “leftism” as our key affliction - like a gear being controlled by YKW way down there, on a level normally taken for granted, about which we normally suspend disbelief, but where a very fundamental change in bias needs to occur for the sake of our racial solidarity and defense. We had previously observed Tobias Langdon (at TOO) making this transformation and now Joyce is doing it too - a very good move.
Note that we did do that here, suggesting that aversion to the socializing classification (White Left) and acceptance of rightist identity ascribed by Jews, creates alienated, deprived individuals, such as Mair, feeling as if they have no social recourse.
Joyce starts this paragraph by weening us off “The Left” and “liberal left” a bit more, but in this context, we understand that he means by this a “Red Left” - a Jewish led coalition of unions against Whites, White men in particular - to weaken their boundaries through liberalization and other forms of destruction.
Way down, in the engine-room, is a giant cog which the Jews have been in control of - with its direction, they have been designation our enemies “the left”, thus diverting our people from the humane and moral act of unionizing in our advocative defense, while prescribing its opposite - liberalism - the disintigrative, individualistic propensity to rupture group solidarity. And because White people have been confused by having this liberalizing action called “the left”, they have been put off from their necessary participatory, unionizing action and indeed: the coherence of group interests and its accountability that will allow for the willing suspension of disbelief necessary for cooperation, coordination, agency and the operationally verifiable warrant of our human ecology. Comments:2
Posted by Liberal, Red & White left are serviceable on Thu, 23 Jun 2016 19:20 | #
No, they are terms that we define by their internal logic. A Red Left is a union of non or anti-Whites (typically organized by YKW) which imposes liberalism upon Whites. A White Left Looks after our union against imposed liberalization of its boundaries and borders. A left is a union. It can coincide with a union of the nation of natives (and should). A union has members and non members by definition. White people are not always where their roots are, but their genetics can be unionized anywhere. A liberal is one who wants to go beyond union bounds or to introduce outsiders into union bounds, of our concern, of our genetics especially, but also territorially - to introduce foreign people against union homogeneity; and perhaps to practice foreign ways within the union; practices which may or may not lead to the union being weakened. While “rootless” is an OK adjective and will work well in some places - it can even be said to have connection to DNA - it over emphasizes territory at the expense of DNA connection and deliberate responsibility thereof - which a White Left, on the other hand, does capture. Of course the word White is of a genus but with each species, each native nationalist union, for example, the noun would be specified in place of the word “White” - Native English and so on. 3
Posted by Bill on Thu, 23 Jun 2016 20:38 | # Is postmodern liberalism the new religion for the 21st century? Or is it the New Age Movement? Or are they both the same thing? Or what? It puzzles me why nationalism gives scant regard to the messianic fervor of postmodern liberal Diana-ism, manifesting itself in ever more frequent orgies of hand wringing in efforts of excorcising the demon of hate. The choice of globalist religion for the 21st century seems to be something called the New Age Movement, which in turn is a creation of the UN. Again, it seems, (I’m no expert) post modern liberalism has, at its roots, seamlessly occupied the void created by the diminishing returns of Christianity. The iniquitous SJW of liberalism doubling for both. I’m writing this by the seat of my pants, as I too have paid little regard to the similarity of post modern liberalism and the New Age Movement. Is there anybody out there who can shed more light on the subject? 4
Posted by White post modernity on Thu, 23 Jun 2016 21:12 | # Good grief, Bill. We’ve been through this: proper definition of post modernity - we’ll call it White post modernity, in order to distinguish it from deliberate Jewish confusion of the term - is too important to allow to be swallowed into the Jewish obfuscation machine. White Post Modernity allows for the negotiation of the good and bad aspects of modernity and inherited forms and ways.
5
Posted by EU a tool to destroy Europeans on Sat, 02 Jul 2016 06:03 | # Andrew Joyce interviewed post Brexit. He is convinced that…
http://mediaarchives.gsradio.net/dduke/062916.mp3
6
Posted by (((Ari Paul))) on Sat, 02 Jul 2016 11:41 | # TOO, “Brexit & The Jews”, 1 July 2016:
7
Posted by Labour Party on Mon, 04 Jul 2016 09:56 | #
Post a comment:
Next entry: Brexit Wins! That’s a Union Jack, Jack!
|
|
Existential IssuesDNA NationsCategoriesContributorsEach author's name links to a list of all articles posted by the writer. LinksEndorsement not implied. Immigration
Islamist Threat
Anti-white Media Networks Audio/Video
Crime
Economics
Education General
Historical Re-Evaluation Controlled Opposition
Nationalist Political Parties
Science Europeans in Africa
Of Note MR Central & News— CENTRAL— Patriotic Alternative given the black spot by Guessedworker on Thursday, 14 March 2024 17:14. (View) On Spengler and the inevitable by Guessedworker on Wednesday, 21 February 2024 17:33. (View) Twilight for the gods of complacency? by Guessedworker on Tuesday, 02 January 2024 10:22. (View) Milleniyule 2023 by Guessedworker on Friday, 22 December 2023 13:11. (View) — NEWS — Moscow’s Bataclan by Guessedworker on Friday, 22 March 2024 22:22. (View) Soren Renner Is Dead by James Bowery on Thursday, 21 March 2024 13:50. (View) Collett sets the record straight by Guessedworker on Thursday, 14 March 2024 17:41. (View) CommentsThorn commented in entry 'Moscow's Bataclan' on Thu, 28 Mar 2024 10:26. (View) Al Ross commented in entry 'Moscow's Bataclan' on Thu, 28 Mar 2024 05:37. (View) Thorn commented in entry 'Moscow's Bataclan' on Tue, 26 Mar 2024 15:07. (View) Thorn commented in entry 'Moscow's Bataclan' on Tue, 26 Mar 2024 11:00. (View) Al Ross commented in entry 'Moscow's Bataclan' on Tue, 26 Mar 2024 05:02. (View) Thorn commented in entry 'Moscow's Bataclan' on Mon, 25 Mar 2024 11:39. (View) Al Ross commented in entry 'Moscow's Bataclan' on Mon, 25 Mar 2024 07:51. (View) Al Ross commented in entry 'Moscow's Bataclan' on Mon, 25 Mar 2024 07:46. (View) Al Ross commented in entry 'Moscow's Bataclan' on Mon, 25 Mar 2024 07:41. (View) Thorn commented in entry 'Moscow's Bataclan' on Sun, 24 Mar 2024 12:25. (View) Guessedworker commented in entry 'Moscow's Bataclan' on Sun, 24 Mar 2024 00:42. (View) Thorn commented in entry 'Moscow's Bataclan' on Sat, 23 Mar 2024 22:01. (View) Thorn commented in entry 'Moscow's Bataclan' on Sat, 23 Mar 2024 21:20. (View) Guessedworker commented in entry 'Moscow's Bataclan' on Sat, 23 Mar 2024 20:51. (View) Guessedworker commented in entry 'Moscow's Bataclan' on Sat, 23 Mar 2024 20:45. (View) Thorn commented in entry 'Moscow's Bataclan' on Sat, 23 Mar 2024 17:26. (View) Manc commented in entry 'Moscow's Bataclan' on Sat, 23 Mar 2024 15:56. (View) Thorn commented in entry 'Moscow's Bataclan' on Sat, 23 Mar 2024 14:55. (View) Guessedworker commented in entry 'Moscow's Bataclan' on Sat, 23 Mar 2024 14:07. (View) Thorn commented in entry 'Moscow's Bataclan' on Sat, 23 Mar 2024 13:12. (View) Thorn commented in entry 'Moscow's Bataclan' on Sat, 23 Mar 2024 12:51. (View) Guessedworker commented in entry 'Moscow's Bataclan' on Sat, 23 Mar 2024 10:01. (View) |
Posted by Ryan on Thu, 23 Jun 2016 17:49 | #
Rather than using the term “Liberal” how about the term “Rootless”?
- Rootless tories
- Rootless labuour
- Rootless parties
- Rootless cabal
- Rootless conservatism
- Rootless journalists
- Rootless burecrats
- Rootles apparatchiks
- Rootless civil service
- Rootless academics
- Rootless teachers
- Rootless types
- Thoroughly Rootless types
- Utterly Rootless
- Utter Rootlessness
- Disgustingly Rootless
- Rootless Extremists
- Sheer Rootlessness
- Rootless nihilism
The term rootless is just an excellent word to replace ‘left’ or ‘liberal’ as those are the terms which our enemy defines themselves as. IMO it’s not the level of ‘cuckservative’ but still very good.
Rootless has a physical connection and I beleive that when lexicon links with physical things it gives it has the effect of giving it more legitimacy IMO. Such a thing has propelled the Trump phenomenon. His immigration stance is not known due to ideology or certain policies but physical physical representation: “We’re going to build a Wall! A great big beautiful Wall!” People’s hopes represented in a physical object than sound and ink on a page.
The more well known term, “Rootless cosmopolitian” has been, in my opnion, pre-stigmatised because it is a completely accurate term. The one country that it has widespread use of it is in Israel where it is a secular term.
http://rootless.info/
http://tonykaron.com/
http://www.ynetnews.com/Ext/App/TalkBack/CdaViewOpenTalkBack/0,11382,L-4406797-2,00.html (Comment 35)
http://www.ynet.co.il/Ext/App/TalkBack/CdaViewOpenTalkBack/0,11382,L-3605773-3,00.html (Comment 66)
http://www.israelresearchfellowship.org/fellows201112.html (Last paragraph)
“Rootless Cosmopolitain” is framed as being anti-Jewish when the majority of those who lost influence were gentiles and jews still disproportionately retained positions in the communist party and secret police.