Marx supported black slavery in America

Posted by jonjayray on Thursday, 21 April 2005 08:43.

Another quote from Marx that you never hear about shows how much Leftist culture has changed in the last 150 years—or does it?  With AA they still think in racial terms

Letter from Marx to Pavel Vasilyevich Annenkov, 1846:  “As for slavery, there is no need for me to speak of its bad aspects. The only thing requiring explanation is the good side of slavery. I do not mean indirect slavery, the slavery of proletariat; I mean direct slavery, the slavery of the Blacks in Surinam, in Brazil, in the southern regions of North America.

Direct slavery is as much the pivot upon which our present-day industrialism turns as are machinery, credit, etc. Without slavery there would be no cotton, without cotton there would be no modern industry. It is slavery which has given value to the colonies, it is the colonies which have created world trade, and world trade is the necessary condition for large-scale machine industry. Consequently, prior to the slave trade, the colonies sent very few products to the Old World, and did not noticeably change the face of the world. Slavery is therefore an economic category of paramount importance. Without slavery, North America, the most progressive nation, would be transformed into a patriarchal country. Only wipe North America off the map and you will get anarchy, the complete decay of trade and modern civilisation. But to do away with slavery would be to wipe America off the map. Being an economic category, slavery has existed in all nations since the beginning of the world. All that modern nations have achieved is to disguise slavery at home and import it openly into the New World”

Context here



Comments:


1

Posted by Geoff Beck on Thu, 21 Apr 2005 13:55 | #

I’m not surprised Marx was really against “private” ownership of slaves. Apparently, he does not oppose “public” ownership of slaves, for example the residents of the USSR - which were gov’t property.

In the enlightened and free gov’ts of the West, taking over 50% of our income, with onerous property taxes, and police state laws, are not we, too, “public” slaves.


2

Posted by John S Bolton on Thu, 21 Apr 2005 15:49 | #

From this one could infer also that leftism retains its image of liberationism by means of force, squashing with censorship, or drowning out with public money, those who care enough about the truth to mention the leftist love of slavery, sacrifice, malice and irrationality.


3

Posted by Andrew L on Fri, 22 Apr 2005 05:14 | #

It is Funny how history turns and now the reverse is true, White Anglo’s are now slave for Black , via Taxation, Geoff makes a good point, so now we become slaves for the Grand masters to give to the fat lazy ass 3rd worlders,Most of which would not work in an Iron Lung, and immigrants,Not all, But most. So now the civilized are the opressed, I am sure if we had a choice what my money did, but we do not have that choice, Hale the Masters,Fehrer’S or Bowanna, take time out to punch a politition,and make it very hard, we are Peed Off. If they want to fund their Ideological Bull, then fund it from there own pockets, leave the rest of us alone, OR ELSE.


4

Posted by Geoff Beck on Fri, 22 Apr 2005 14:38 | #

Andrew:

I’m convinced the only reasonable way of resolving the unresolvable problems in America is secession.

I’m watching Vlaams Belang closely. If they can get sucession moving in Flanders, it might spread.

In fact continental Europe had a history of free and independent towns and cities. I think the Anglo Countries will be a bit tougher though.


5

Posted by Andrew L on Fri, 22 Apr 2005 22:22 | #

You conclusions of the Economic and political state are finite,sucession would be Ideal, but in Western Politics, may well be harder, in that the continued quest to isolate the state control, will probably end in civil war,but that of the State against it very own people,To what extent this is possible and out come is worth a thought,Isolate the State and dissarm it , remove the vehicles,and destroy the inculcation of Ideological anti Thieses, Peoples charity will depend on that, The people, not the Mentaly sick that have taken control.


6

Posted by Carlos on Fri, 15 Jul 2005 21:10 | #

Your reading comprehension is not very good, I should say. From Marx’s paragraph above I understand that he did NOT support slavery, but he acknowledges that it has created value in the same way that the proletariat has. These two sentences speak for themselves:

“As for slavery, there is no need for me to speak of its bad aspects.”
“All that modern nations have achieved is to disguise slavery at home and import it openly into the New World”


7

Posted by R. B. on Mon, 02 Aug 2010 21:19 | #

If you make an effort to read all the letter, you wil see Marx is paraphrasing Proudhon’s thinking.

The Right needs more intelligent ideas to criticize Marx…


8

Posted by MALLIKARJUNA SHARMA on Sun, 24 Oct 2010 20:11 | #

Marx was an abolitionist to the core and not a supporter of slavery. It has become fashionable to give quotations torn out of context and suppressing others which directly contradict the said quotation or content of the quotation. For example Marx hailed the rebellion of slaves and civil war to end slavery in America as an epochal event and declared “a white worker cannot emancipate himself when the black worker is branded” See this: “Marx was a leading European abolitionist. During the U.S. Civil War Marx urged and organized English textile workers to support the blockade against the Confederacy, even though it was against their immediate economic interests and led to massive layoffs due to the cutoff of imported cotton. Marx took this position because, as he wrote to Engels on the eve of the Civil War, the uprisings of slaves in the U.S. and of serfs in Russia were the “two most important events” taking place in the world. Writing about slavery just after the Civil War in Volume I of Capital (1867, 1961:301), Marx explained why he regarded the struggle against slavery as crucial to the future of the working class: “In the United States of North America every independent movement of the workers was paralyzed so long as slavery disfigured a part of the republic. Labour cannot emancipate itself in the white skin where in the black it is branded.”


9

Posted by Arthur L on Sat, 14 May 2011 19:39 | #

Very bad analysis to attribute industrialization to slavery. Slave owners and their illicit New World wards had nothing to do with industrialization. This is a stab at correlating economies in time where there was no real shared relationship but time. Ridiculous. Cotton production using slaves is pretty much the opposite of industrialization.


It is interesting to hear modern pseudo-Marxists explain that Marx’s ethical opposition to slavery was due to a love of humanity. This quote helps illustrate that Marx’s ethical opposition to slavery in the United States was based on his belief that economic progress towards capitalism was good, and that slavery was an outmoded and inefficient method of production. Here he clearly recognizes the “paramount” importance of the economic epoch of North American slavery.

While the enigmatic ethical end of communist thought may or may not have been a humanism similar to that touted by the modern radical-liberals, Marx’s ethical perspective in relation to the transition from slavery to capitalism is made apparent and distinct by this quote.

Marx had nothing but contempt for Negroes, in his letters to Engels he’s constantly using the word “nigger”(and no its not because it was a common term back then; the German language at that time actually didnt even contain the word).

He also hated Asians, Indians, and Slavs(he and Engels constantly called for German expansion into the East and exterminate Slavic peoples).

Yes I read these quotes some time ago, it makes me laugh everytime i hear a fake lefty claim they are marxists, When Marx would clearly have detested them!

It is also funny that most lefties think they are rebels, they only thing they rebel against is soap, everything else about them is mass media comformist!

The poor sods don’t even realise they are brainwashed useful idiots being manipulated by the super rich bankers, royals and corporate elites, through the controlled media - the NWO.

Here is a lesson on how the sheep are manipulated into conformists by the left wing consensus media and education system and why people are afraid to share their true beliefs in order to fit in -

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TYIh4MkcfJA&feature=player_embedded


10

Posted by anon on Tue, 07 Jun 2011 19:26 | #

You obviously have a severe misunderstanding of Marx. Firstly, I don’t see how anyone would read this and conclude that “Marx supported slavery”; he’s simply explaining how slavery was utilized for the tremendous development of trade from the west to the east. There is no “for or against” here.

Secondly, if you actually read some more rather than look for little excerpts to take wildly out of context, you will learn that Marx was “for” abolishing slavery even before Lincoln’s Emancipation Proclamation.

Go read some philosophy and/or study rhetoric before you make such uneducated claims to pass off as facts.


11

Posted by anon on Sun, 09 Oct 2011 17:11 | #

For fucks sake, read the fucking context.  This is Marx summing up another persons views, they are not Marx’s views. If I were to say ‘the KKK think black people should be lynched’ would you quote me as saying ‘black people should be lynched’?


12

Posted by Eustacius on Wed, 23 Jan 2013 06:16 | #

Anyone who wants to say what they think Marx wrote should read what Marx wrote.  Marxist Internet Archive has all of it and it’s free to read.  Marx was not an idealist.  He was one of the first true social scientist along with Engels.  Read Capital, at least volume one.  All capitalist society is based on commodity production including commodified labor.  Chattel slavery is a pre-commodity form of labor.  The labor power of the slave is not bought and sold on the market, only the laborers themselves are sold.  Marx’s key insight was to show how labor power was transformed into commodity labor as the social opposite of capital.  Marx advocated the end of commodity labor by workers taking control of the social means of production.  By workers taking control of the means of social production, commodity labor would end.  He certainly did not advocate or believe that substituting chattel labor for commodified labor was the path to freedom.  You might say he and Engels were the first libertarians of labor.


13

Posted by Jake on Tue, 10 Mar 2015 20:56 | #

I don’t know how you could possibly misunderstand this quote so poorly.  Marx is explaining how slavery is good for capitalism, not morally or ethically good.  He’s quite clear about the opposite.  Maybe you should read the whole fucking letter before saying something so dumb. 

Also, do NONE of you understand economics?  You don’t see how slavery and colonization were necessary for capitalism to expand?  Morons.



Post a comment:


Name: (required)

Email: (required but not displayed)

URL: (optional)

Note: You should copy your comment to the clipboard or paste it somewhere before submitting it, so that it will not be lost if the session times out.

Remember me


Next entry: Since history repeats …
Previous entry: Donald Rumsfeld: A Manager’s Life

image of the day

Existential Issues

DNA Nations

Establishment Problem

All Categories

The Contributors

Links

Endorsement not implied.

Immigration

Islamist Threat

Anti-white Media Networks

Audio/Video

Crime

Economics

Education

General

Historical Re-Evaluation

Controlled Opposition

Nationalist Political Parties

Science

Europeans in Africa

Of Note

Recent Comments

Huh? commented in entry 'Chinese Offer Solution To European Race Replacement: Clone Europe' on Sun, 30 Aug 2015 06:31. (View)

James Reinfeld commented in entry 'Maintenance Summary: The present situation.' on Sun, 30 Aug 2015 04:35. (View)

Soy Bean Oil = Monsanto Round Up commented in entry '"Rock solid, unwavering, enduring, forever!"' on Sat, 29 Aug 2015 13:07. (View)

Fat, black and proud commented in entry 'Black history 'stolen' in Birth of a Nation, 're-appropriation' in Guess Who's Coming to Dinner?' on Sat, 29 Aug 2015 12:54. (View)

Nazi gold train found in Poland commented in entry 'Poland' on Fri, 28 Aug 2015 16:43. (View)

difference between kkk and liberals.. commented in entry 'Black history 'stolen' in Birth of a Nation, 're-appropriation' in Guess Who's Coming to Dinner?' on Fri, 28 Aug 2015 16:20. (View)

Kelsie Schelling commented in entry 'WHITE WOMEN FOR SALE!' on Fri, 28 Aug 2015 16:07. (View)

DanielS commented in entry 'Maintenance Summary: The present situation.' on Fri, 28 Aug 2015 03:33. (View)

DanielS commented in entry 'Maintenance Summary: The present situation.' on Thu, 27 Aug 2015 16:38. (View)

DanielS commented in entry 'Maintenance Summary: The present situation.' on Thu, 27 Aug 2015 15:15. (View)

Guessedworker commented in entry 'Federica Mogherini's cross-eyed view of what it means to be European: At Her Master's Genocidal Call' on Thu, 27 Aug 2015 11:43. (View)

Kumiko Oumae commented in entry 'Federica Mogherini's cross-eyed view of what it means to be European: At Her Master's Genocidal Call' on Thu, 27 Aug 2015 02:25. (View)

live murder commented in entry 'Black history 'stolen' in Birth of a Nation, 're-appropriation' in Guess Who's Coming to Dinner?' on Wed, 26 Aug 2015 18:03. (View)

Guessedworker commented in entry 'Federica Mogherini's cross-eyed view of what it means to be European: At Her Master's Genocidal Call' on Wed, 26 Aug 2015 08:04. (View)

Sacred Sikh Bling commented in entry 'Should we deviate from authenticity in order to “game” women?' on Tue, 25 Aug 2015 20:09. (View)

Calls his business a religion commented in entry ''White privilege' as a warrant for expropriation; Christianity as the executing jurisdiction.' on Tue, 25 Aug 2015 14:36. (View)

Vito's dancing dasein commented in entry 'A Conspiracy Theory of A Conspiracy Theory to Divert From White Male Dasein' on Tue, 25 Aug 2015 11:56. (View)

We're all brothers on tomorrow commented in entry 'Federica Mogherini's cross-eyed view of what it means to be European: At Her Master's Genocidal Call' on Tue, 25 Aug 2015 11:34. (View)

$600 commented in entry 'WHITE WOMEN FOR SALE!' on Tue, 25 Aug 2015 09:15. (View)

US groups pay smugglers of Africans into EU commented in entry 'African Population Explosion - Augurs to Overwhelm Europe' on Tue, 25 Aug 2015 09:08. (View)

Susanne Shank commented in entry 'White Left Imperative to defense, systemic health of European peoples' on Mon, 24 Aug 2015 10:58. (View)

Dave commented in entry 'The Lies Will Try to Live but they're Not White they're Jewish' on Sun, 23 Aug 2015 18:20. (View)

Hasan Yusuf commented in entry 'Why Hitler hated Jews' on Sun, 23 Aug 2015 09:30. (View)

1,200 + 170,000 (this year) commented in entry 'African Population Explosion - Augurs to Overwhelm Europe' on Sat, 22 Aug 2015 17:32. (View)

"Cultural citizenship" & "flexible citizenship" commented in entry ''White privilege' as a warrant for expropriation; Christianity as the executing jurisdiction.' on Sat, 22 Aug 2015 12:41. (View)

Golden Dawn's mandate to form new gov't commented in entry 'Golden Dawn fighting at the ballot box' on Sat, 22 Aug 2015 09:36. (View)

DanielS commented in entry 'White Left Imperative to defense, systemic health of European peoples' on Fri, 21 Aug 2015 09:41. (View)

Guessedworker commented in entry 'White Left Imperative to defense, systemic health of European peoples' on Thu, 20 Aug 2015 23:14. (View)

DanielS commented in entry 'White Left Imperative to defense, systemic health of European peoples' on Thu, 20 Aug 2015 20:20. (View)

Guessedworker commented in entry 'White Left Imperative to defense, systemic health of European peoples' on Thu, 20 Aug 2015 19:13. (View)

Heather Maples commented in entry 'WHITE WOMEN FOR SALE!' on Thu, 20 Aug 2015 14:18. (View)

"Refugee" Invasion, murder of Europeans commented in entry 'African Population Explosion - Augurs to Overwhelm Europe' on Thu, 20 Aug 2015 13:05. (View)

Guessedworker commented in entry 'Natural rights, human rights or social classification apprehending the important distinctions?' on Wed, 19 Aug 2015 12:46. (View)

Political correctness, i.e., cultural Marxism commented in entry 'White Left contra de Benoist's critique of "left & right"' on Wed, 19 Aug 2015 10:33. (View)

Montsalvat on de Benoist commented in entry 'White Left contra de Benoist's critique of "left & right"' on Wed, 19 Aug 2015 10:13. (View)

affection-tone