New Labour’s friends and enemies

Posted by Guessedworker on Monday, 12 September 2005 07:25.

Example 1: It is by talking to people with varying views that we find out what the range of opinions is. It doesn’t mean we agree with what they are saying.

A government spokesman defending past consultations with Mr Armad Thomson, from the Association of Muslim Lawyers, following the uncovering of his true opinions by the Telegraph.

Example 2: Britain’s political police have impounded the entire lorry load of the September issue of the party newspaper “Voice of Freedom”.

As the events of the day unfold they reveal a shocking abuse of power, disregard for the law of the land and the extent to which the British government is desperate to stem the advances the BNP is making in communities the length and breadth of the country ...

The 60,000 copies may be lying in a compound but the stories will be available for the entire global Internet population to read. Such a decision can only pile on the embarrassment to the New Labour regime. Any journalist worth his or her self esteem should read these articles in VoF and ask themselves “is this it?” Is that what Blair and Co are trying to suppress?

Yes, “this is it”, it is exactly what the Blair regime wants to suppress.

The news, as reported on the BNP’s website, that New Labour doesn’t want you and me to come into contact with the opinions of the patriotic right.

You can, however, “do a New Labour” and “consult” all 16 pages of the VoF on that link.

Tags: Oh Tempora, Oh Mores

Comments:

Posted by John S Bolton on Mon, 12 Sep 2005 08:30 | #

This may show how vulnerable the moderate left feels; that there could be an erosion of their working class base. Nationalism can transcend many divides; but disloyalism ultimately has only a tiny and embarassing constituency.

Posted by jonjayray on Mon, 12 Sep 2005 14:04 | #

The BNP site seems to have been taken out at the moment

Posted by Geoff Beck on Mon, 12 Sep 2005 14:41 | #

I subscribe to this magazine, I suppose my copy is locked up?

BTW, I read Ahmad Thomson’s comments, frankly I don’t think he is that
far off on the Zionist question. Has anyone here read the PNAC document
drafted for Natanyahoo in 1995? Furthermore Thomson’s observations on
the corruption of Western societies, while I don’t exactly agree with,
are worthy of speculation. As for the Freemasons… I don’t know about
that.

Salter, according to a recent article I read, suggested an inverse
relationship between penis size and brain size. At first I laughed,
but thought about it some more… well I after a while I thought he
really might be on to something.

Posted by Steve Edwards on Mon, 12 Sep 2005 18:40 | #

BTW - if anyone ever doubted Wikipedia’s bias, check out the following link, and scroll down to “white self hatred”. You’ll be astonished by the entry:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Self-hatred#Jewish_self-hatred

Posted by Svigor on Mon, 12 Sep 2005 19:20 | #

LOL Steve! White-haters can’t even get it together enough to put up a decent front (or any kind of front for that matter).

They just made it a one-liner dig against white identity and moved on. They couldn’t even bring themselves to mention wiggers.

Recognizing that it would be racist to exclude whites from the article altogether was as far as they could go.

Posted by Svigor on Mon, 12 Sep 2005 20:53 | #

http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/england/kent/4236640.stm

Hat tip to Modern Tribalist.