None dare call it White genocide

Posted by Guest Blogger on Wednesday, 25 August 2010 05:31.

The case for a new discourse of genocide in our lands

by Christian Miller

The overarching goal of the “open borders” movement is to flood millions of non-Whites into all traditionally White nations.  Make no mistake - this is not mere coincidence.  It is White genocide by design, worldwide in application.  The United States, Great Britain, France, Germany, Belgium, the Netherlands, and Australia: White people founded and populated these nations.  All of these nations operated under the implicit mandate, if not explicit by law, that they existed as White nations for the posterity of the White founding stock.  All of these nations had overwhelmingly White populations for the preponderance of their national history.  Now, in the beginning of the twenty-first century, all of these traditionally White nations face demographic upheavals through massive non-White immigration.  The White populations of these countries are slated to become minority populations in just a few generations.

Why is the push for unrestricted immigration focused so strongly and so specifically upon the traditionally White nations?  Some say the traditionally White nations are economically advanced and therefore desirable destinations for immigration.  This observation is mostly accurate.  However, it does not explain the entire story because there are many other advanced nations that are traditionally non-White, yet face no pressure to absorb foreign populations.

Japan is one of the most highly advanced economies in the world.  It is a well-known and well-documented fact that Japan faces a grave population decline.  There are not enough young Japanese to assume the lower rungs of the workforce.  The elderly Japanese population looms on the horizon, destined to strain the retirement and pension system.  The Japanese reproductive rate is far below the replacement rate.  Over time, Japan’s population will continue its precipitous descent.  Under the orthodox globalist economic doctrine, Japan’s situation beckons for a massive influx of cheap foreign labor.  Yet somehow the international political discourse barely broaches the topic of massive non-Japanese immigration to Japan.  There is no strong international or domestic pressure (or imperious demand) for Japan to import millions of Africans or South Americans.  Japan is not singled out for genocide via massive non-Japanese immigration.  Japan is not the target.  Japan is free to remain Japanese.  It is only White nations that are targeted for genocide.

Egalitarians claim “the race problem” will disappear if the traditionally White nations assimilate and interbreed with non-White populations.  Some imagine this will produce a utopia of brown-skinned beauties - society without race by homogeneous default.  Others recognize this scenario as the systematic eradication of the White race - White genocide.  To bolster the credibility of the latter position, put the shoe on the other foot.

Assume for the sake of argument that in a stunning reversal, political correctness dictates that Africans are racist oppressors.  Africans disproportionately enjoy material niceties, unfairly subjugate other races, and an invisible “African privilege” pervades the air which mysteriously oppresses all other races.  In this hypothetical world, institutional racism means that Africans are predisposed to success and worldly gain from birth, as a result of the current political power relationship.  Now, follow the usual prescription for healing with plans for coercive diversity and watch the fireworks begin!

The continent of Africa can solve “the race problem” by a massive influx of non-Africans.  These non-Africans will assimilate and interbreed with Africans over time.  The end result will be a utopia of mocha-skinned beauties - society without race by homogeneous default.  Everyone will hold hands in unity, hatred will be a thing of the past, and racial oppression will no longer be an option.

A sharp mind quickly realizes the solution to “the race problem” in the African example is actually the Final Solution for Africans.  That is, the systematic eradication of the African people - African genocide.  No rational Black man will agree with such a genocidal campaign.  No reasonable Black man will stand by and cheer on the destruction of his or her fellow Africans.  No race deserves genocide.  Every race has the right to exist biologically, ethnically, and culturally.

International law defines genocide as an international crime against humanity, with grave punishment for violations.  As far as the international recognition of the reality of race, ask the ghosts of Saddam Hussein or Wilhelm Frick if the Kurds or Jews, respectively, are mere social constructs.  Race is an internationally-recognized reality and is a major factor in the crime of genocide.  In the future, the political and economic elites that are responsible for the policies of White genocide may face trial before an international tribunal.  The 1948 United Nations Convention on the Prevention and Punishment of the Crime of Genocide, Article II states:

In the present Convention, genocide means any of the following acts committed with the intent to destroy, in whole or in part, a national, ethnic, racial, or religious group as such:

(a) Killing members of the group;

(b) Causing serious bodily or mental harm to members of the group;

(c) Deliberately inflicting on the group conditions of life calculated to bring about its physical destruction in whole or in part;

(d) Imposing measures intended to prevent births within the group;

(e) Forcibly transferring children of the group to another group.

The present immigration and political policies of many traditionally White nations, especially the United States, are in violation of part (c) and possibly part (d).  White nations have been subverted to conditions that heavily favor non-White immigration, restrict White birthrates, and encourage and support non-White birthrates, and are thus calculated to bring about the physical destruction of the White race.  There are many quotations of politicians, professors, and pundits advocating this very point - the end of the White race.  Genocide is not always an act of traditional murder.  The United Nations Convention on Genocide covers violent genocide with parts (a) and (b).  However, the remaining definitions cover indirect and incremental methods to clarify that any form of genocide is punishable under international law.

The United States employed an explicitly pro-White immigration policy for the entirety of its two centuries of existence until the treasonous 1965 Immigration Act, which reversed this safeguard and subverted American immigration policy to discriminate against White Europeans in favor of non-White immigration.  Prior to the 1965 Act, American immigration policy favored White European immigration to maintain the status quo of the American population.  The behind-the-scenes architects of the 1965 Act realized that overwhelmingly non-White legal immigration would inevitably reduce the White American population over time.  The political front men of the 1965 Act, such as Ted Kennedy, falsely assured the American public that the new immigration policy would not upset the racial balance of America. In 1965, America was approximately 89 percent White.  Just a few generations later, America is around 65 percent White.  In one more generation, White Americans will be a minority in their own country.

Illegal aliens create further demographic chaos, as White Americans are crowded out and out-bred by millions of mestizo illegal aliens from South America.  Despite overwhelming public desire to seal the border and to deport and deny entry to illegal aliens, the federal government has willfully ignored its mandate to protect against all threats, foreign and domestic.  Non-White legal immigrants and tens of millions of mestizo illegal alien invaders will dispossess the White American majority in the next few decades.  White Americans will become a minority in their own nation.

Overwhelmingly non-White legal immigration and millions of non-White illegal aliens are inherently destructive to the White American population.  Welfare and social benefit policies financially reward the generally poorer non-White groups for having large broods of children.  Preferential hiring policies set aside jobs for non-Whites.  Lax enforcement of employment law allows non-Whites to undercut the wages of educated White American citizens.  The appalling aspect of these trends is that most of these policies, such as welfare, food stamps, and free emergency medical care, are predominantly financed by White American taxpayers.  These White American taxpayers labor under conditions calculated to bring about their genocide as the progressive income tax discourages the most productive White Americans from having children.

Educated, self-reliant, and law-abiding White American taxpayers face the greatest disincentives to having large families.  Instead, these White taxpayers work hard but are forced to financially support criminals, illegal aliens, and welfare abusers.  The taxes paid by hardworking White citizens are transferred to illiterate illegal aliens to bankroll large broods of anchor babies that will produce an ever-increasing amount of welfare obligations and future criminals.  The White American population dwindles while the non-White populations exponentially increase, further straining the welfare system, crowding prison cells, diluting educational standards, and destroying formerly safe White neighborhoods.  White Americans face incremental genocide by design, which is precisely why so many fail to recognize the creeping trend.  Genocide need not be associated with machetes, firing squads, or executions.  The type of genocide White Americans face is far more subtle, which makes it all the more dangerous.

To deny White citizens of White nations the right to preserve themselves - biologically, ethnically, and culturally - is the true example of racism and hatred.  Genocide is never acceptable.  What can be more racist than the systematic eradication of an entire race?  White Americans need not be ashamed of identifying on a racial basis, as every other race in America has a political license to do so.  La Raza, the League of United Latino American Citizens, the National Association for the Advancement of Colored People, and the Anti-Defamation League of the B’nai B’rith are all bound by racial or ethnic ties.

White Americans are now approaching minority status in the nation their forefathers fought for and built from the ground up.  If the current birthrates continue, White Americans will be a minority group in a few generations.  White Americans must be free to object to the immigration policy of White genocide without being shouted down as “racists”, a term which has lost potency due to its use as a political tool to silence White advocacy.  “Racist” is a thinly-veiled attempt to silence a person who wishes to protect his or her race from extinction - a person who opposes genocide.  “Racist” is an empty slur meant to shut down debate, silence White people, and obfuscate the reality of White genocide.

White Americans must be free to describe racial injustices committed against White people.  Introduce the term “anti-White” to mainstream political discourse in the only way possible - by starting with private conversation.  The mainstream media attempts to mold public opinion, but when there is an seismic shift in American thought, the press has no choice but to bow to popular pressure.  Demand an end to White genocide and anti-White policies.

White Americans have the same claims to identity, organization, advocacy, and existence as does any other group in America.  Take a principled, adamant, and vocal stand against White genocide.  Talk to neighbors and inform friends.  Write letters to editors, television producers, media figures, and especially politicians.  Let the muffled White voice clear its throat and speak up clearly and forcefully after decades of silence.  Turn the tables and take back the moral high ground.  The truth is dangerous, which is precisely why slurs like “racist” are currently used to shout down reasonable opposition to White genocide.  Brush aside such denunciations, or better yet, mount the offense with a counterattack.

Anyone who opposes a return to traditional American immigration policies is pro-White genocide.  Anyone who supports amnesty for tens of millions of illegal aliens is pro-White genocide.  The current American immigration policy discriminates against White Europeans and is pro-White genocide.  There is nothing more racist than genocide, because it is the destruction of an entire race.  If someone shouts “racist!” in a petty attempt to silence debate, explain that a real racist is someone who wants to commit genocide against the White race.  Stop White genocide one conversation, one talking point, one letter, one complaint, one comment, one remark, and one person at a time.  Stay on a consistent message against White genocide.

The White race of the future, if there is to be one, will be grateful.

Tags: Activism



Posted by Fred Scrooby on Wed, 25 Aug 2010 07:19 | #

Landmark article.  Of course we at MR have been saying all of that since October 2004, every single word of it, but better late than never.  Welcome aboard, Christian Miller!


Posted by Lurker on Wed, 25 Aug 2010 07:52 | #

What Fred said…


Posted by Gorboduc on Wed, 25 Aug 2010 07:54 | #

Fred: 100% endorsement on both counts!

The essay’s gone into a file with the “7 Questions” for further circulation along with a few other red-letter contributions: Christian Miller, congratulations and thanks for a clear summary.

A few little edits will make it just as applicable to us in Blighty!


Posted by Guessedworker on Wed, 25 Aug 2010 09:33 | #

Fine, Fred.


Posted by StopWhiteGenocide on Wed, 25 Aug 2010 10:36 | #

I can’t wait for the Genocide tribunals. They can’t come soon enough!


Posted by Gregor on Wed, 25 Aug 2010 11:24 | #

Good on ya Fred! 

Trolls always seem to show up when some powerful pro-white discourse surfaces.  They hate it, so we hate them.


Posted by Gregor on Wed, 25 Aug 2010 11:29 | #

Mr. Miller;

It’s pretty obvious that you’ve taken Bob Whitaker’s Mantra and elaborated it into a form that doesn’t require much effort on the part of the reader to “get it”.

While the Mantra is short and succinct enough to insert in blogs as a Discourse Weapon, it’s one failing, imho, is that it requires too much thinking on the part of a certain segment of the readers, unless they’re already partially “pro-white”. 

Your expansion has provided us with a great tool to post as a link when we don’t want to explain everything ourselves.  Only the dumbest and most brainwashed White person will not be able to get a glimmer of what is really happening to them and their co-ethnics after reading your text.

Thank you very much.


Posted by Seriouswon on Wed, 25 Aug 2010 12:37 | #

Excellent.  Bookmarked.


Posted by John on Wed, 25 Aug 2010 13:05 | #

“Trolls always seem to show up when some powerful pro-white discourse surfaces.  They hate it, so we hate them. “

Could be because I cross-posted it on (it got moved to hot topics, not accessible to non-members).


Posted by Tanstaafl on Wed, 25 Aug 2010 14:01 | #

genocide - Age of Treason


Posted by Matt Nuenke on Wed, 25 Aug 2010 15:42 | #

To understand how the 1965 immigration act came about one needs to read Kevin MacDonald’s “The Culture of Critique.” This book is a must read in understanding Jewish efforts to undermine Whites. However, after passage of the bill, it took on a life of its own. I remember after 9/11 it took the Neocons several years before they slowly began to feel that perhaps Islam may be more of a threat to the Jews than Whites, and at least some of them joined the anti-immigration movement.


Posted by Desmond Jones on Wed, 25 Aug 2010 16:12 | #

Genocide was painted more broadly by its originator Raphael Lemkin (1900–1959), a Polish-Jewish legal scholar.

Generally speaking, genocide does not necessarily mean the immediate destruction of a nation, except when accomplished by mass killings of all members of a nation. It is intended rather to signify a coordinated plan of different actions aiming at the destruction of essential foundations of the life of national groups, with the aim of annihilating the groups themselves. The objectives of such a plan would be the disintegration of the political and social institutions, of culture, language, national feelings, religion, and the economic existence of national groups, and the destruction of the personal security, liberty, health, dignity, and even the lives of the individuals belonging to such groups.[9]


Posted by Bill on Wed, 25 Aug 2010 16:12 | #

The new bourgoisie are whites.

Age of Treason   20. 8. 2010

Committing PC’s Most Mortal Sin

For quite a while now Christians and whites have been subjected to brutal criticism. Much of it bogus. Today this has reached such a fevered pitch that I truly fear it has already well paved the way to outright genocide. We have been so vilified, so dehumanized, that as we slip into minority status it seems perfectly certain that those of us who have never owned slaves, never stole land from Mexicans, never colonized the Middle East, and never gassed any Jews stand stained with those things, literally carrying it in the color of our skin, and we will be, we are being, put to death for those sins.


Posted by One or t`other on Wed, 25 Aug 2010 23:04 | #

An excellent article.

The reality of White genocide cannot be argued with honestly,and like the writer says,the racist “shut up” word can be immediately reflected back on to the anti-White “moral crusader”.


Posted by Fred Scrooby on Thu, 26 Aug 2010 00:13 | #

I just read the Age of Treason entry and comments thread linked above by Bill (got through the first two-thirds of the comments).  Hadn’t seen it before.  Now that I have, I recommend it.  Very good stuff.


Posted by Selous Scout on Thu, 26 Aug 2010 00:21 | #

Well said CM. Whites can not push the “genocide” angle on our brothers and sisters enough.


Posted by Guessedworker on Thu, 26 Aug 2010 03:37 | #

I have moved Socrates comment to the If at first you don’t succeed thread to preserve the utility of Christian’s post for those who wish to link to it on non-WN media.


Posted by Leon Haller on Thu, 26 Aug 2010 15:01 | #

Ok, this didn’t exactly strike a chord (or elicit a single comment), so ... I re-post. Because it’s important (to me, anyway).

I still think we need to develop that “nationalist minimum”, and then start practical, tactical discussions. I don’t think we need to theorize everything at the outset. We know what we want: White preservation! Non-white foreigners OUT!! No excuses or exceptions. We don’t need to resolve the strategic mistakes or ethicality of all the wrong turns our race has followed. We don’t need extended intra-racial bickering. We don’t need to establish the exact ontological status of Jewry. We don’t even exactly need to determine who is white. We simply must stop the alien invasion. Without that, all other issues become (near-) mute (well, for now; once we have lost of demographic majorities, we then need to think about how to protect ourselves as minorities).

One idea/question: how best can we further the development of a Pan-European genetic nationalist movement? What we need is pro-white internationalism. This is obviously not a new idea, but does there exist any international pro-white organization? Could one be created? I’m thinking of something that transcends borders, and specific nationalisms. An international white brotherhood, not simply an alliance of nationalist parties. Say, The Leonidas Legion. The Indo-European League. Or just the Aryan Legion, the Occidental League/brotherhood/whatever.

Note how the Jews jealously protect the interests of their own everywhere, not just in their own countries and Israel. We need some international organization which can be similarly internationally active, but which would also serve as an international social club of sorts. A place of refuge in major cities around the world, with the ability to recommend amenities, provide emergency legal or banking referrals, etc.

If we aren’t just blowing endless hot air, we all have to get out of cyberspace and into things in the actual world. Just some thoughts from someone who’s been thinking for decades, but wants to start doing.


Posted by PM on Thu, 26 Aug 2010 15:27 | #

Regarding what the article states about the fact that there is no clamour for Japan to start importing non-whites: the reasons for this may not be conspiratorial. I have noticed that there is a strong tendency, all the more pronounced amongst liberals because they do not recognise it, to try and impose your morality far more on people who look like you. This makes sense from a tribal perspective—it is far more important that those who are of the same stock as you will think the same way as you, as they are a part of your society. So it could simply be that on a subconscious level white liberals simply do not feel the same kind of urgency to impose their moral standards on orientals that they feel no kinship with. All of which is very ironic seeing as such people do not profess to think ‘racially.’


Posted by AunDoorback on Thu, 26 Aug 2010 16:59 | #

Certain terms have been destroyed by targeted mockery. “Religion of Peace” has now come to mean the exact opposite. Its former advocates have dropped it.

“Vibrant” is rapidly morphing into: “being stabbed.”

“Racist” needs to go the same way. It needs to be rendered useless.


Posted by Fred Scrooby on Thu, 26 Aug 2010 19:00 | #

“Racist” needs to go the same way. It needs to be rendered useless.  (—AunDoorback)

And it will.  Along with “anti-Semite.”  The Jews have way overplayed their hand with both.


Posted by Drifter on Thu, 26 Aug 2010 23:57 | #

Add this to a general New Right platform:

Mass immigration is genocide. Because humans are biodiverse, genocide is ecocide. Any form of Ecocide is punishable by death. Overpopulation causes mass immigration which causes genocide which is ecocide which is punishable by death. There’s your billions will die, we will win formula. Ecology conservation needs to get added alongside the overstated nationalism stuff for a comprehensive program to work.


Posted by Drifter on Fri, 27 Aug 2010 00:32 | #

And it will.  Along with “anti-Semite.” The Jews have way overplayed their hand with both.

Globalist and globalism have now been villified in the minds of many. The Alex Jones, libertarian, and Tea Party types come to mind.

Liberal and liberalism are presently on the chopping block, soon to be equated with what ‘Nazi’ is now, but they’re wussy about it which is in many ways a worse association. Up to no good and cowardly about it paints a shoddy social image indeed.


Posted by Leon Haller on Fri, 27 Aug 2010 06:08 | #

Ah, another suggestive comment of mine generates absolutely no notice. Fuck it. My intellect, interests, strategic approaches and general outlook are incompatible with this site. I shall waste no more time here.


Posted by heartfelt on Sat, 28 Aug 2010 12:15 | #

I’m with Leon @ August 26, 2010, 07:01 PM, on doing rather than theorising. On the issue of political organisation, revolution, and liberation war, I think Whites need to look into their soul and ask themselves, would you be willing to organise and mobilise as a people and if forced to do so commit extreme actions in defence of your family, your people, your country? Are you man enough and clear-eyed enough to overcome the intellectual and moral qualms about standing up in the real world? For White people, this is all it comes down to!!! That’s it. We are not in a difficult dilemma here, folks. Once you accept the moral necessity of revolution and its attendant behaviours, then the process simply becomes a question of, How? Where? When?


Posted by Bill on Sat, 28 Aug 2010 15:50 | #

A policeman’s lot is not a happy one.

The EDL were away today at Bradford.  Latest score:-

English Defence League nil Bradford City nil.

The job’s comment are varied and interesting.


Posted by Fred Scrooby on Sat, 28 Aug 2010 15:56 | #

”Malta is one-fifth the size of Greater London and has a population of 409,000”  (—Derek Turner piece linked below)

Yet with the E.U.’s blessing, nay insistence, the whole continent of Africa is pouring in as we speak, an elephant trying to fit inside a thimble.  Dan Dare is going to say the ones in the E.U. who are race-replacing Malta as we speak don’t know their policies imposed on this tiny island are going to race-replace it in short order?  Is Dan going to dare to say that?  Yes he is, that’s why he’s called Dan Dare:  he dares to say the most outrageous nonsense imaginable.  Yep, name fits.

So the report concludes by recommending the cheaper strategy that is always resorted to by today’s politicians, to make the [Maltese] natives feel guilty for wishing to preserve the country they love:

”Efforts should be made… to implement a sustained information exercise in the media…Such a campaign needs to air regularly.”

What this amounts to is that the Maltese are to be lectured for wishing to remain Maltese — and they will be expected to pay for their sensitivity lessons.  Not only this, but they will also be hectored, because along with largesse from Brussels come rafts of bland-sounding but draconian laws about race relations, religious discrimination, equality, and human rights designed to undermine all assumptions and usher in an unwanted, untested and un-European “Europe.”  The effects of these laws — like the laws on abortion and divorce — are yet to be visited upon the unwitting islanders, who may find this insidious enemy harder to resist than Ottoman or German soldiers.

Earth to Dan:  they know they’re race-replacing Malta.  How can we be certain they know?  Re-read the dimensions and population of that island, then re-read excerpt’s paragraph just above this one.  If you still have to ask how we can be certain they know, if you still can’t connect the dots, you’re braindead.


Posted by Angry Beard on Sat, 28 Aug 2010 16:59 | #

      ‘Dan Dare’ was a British comic super hero of the 1950s - rather like your Captain America, but more parochial.He appeared in a publication called ‘Eagle’.


Posted by Fred Scrooby on Sat, 28 Aug 2010 17:31 | #

In the case of tiny Malta at least, Angry Beard, would you say it’s clear the ones in the EU who are forcing

a) high-volume incompatible immigration backed up by

b) race-replacement-guaranteeing domestic social laws, rules, and regulations

know they’re race-replacing the place?  It’s as big as a London borough and stands opposite a continent that is right now pouring forth an unprecedented world-historical Camp of the Saints magnitude tidal wave of non-white Third World population-transfer literally swamping every coastine it touches, and the Maltese are going to be forced by their EU masters to let themselves be swamped, forbidden to defend themselves or even say anything about it on pain of political arrest, political show-trial, fines, prison, and ruin for themselves and their families for the “crime” of “hate speech.”  Do you require a paper trail with all written down in black and white before you’ll agree they must know the portent of their Stalinist actions, namely Malta will be populated with Negroes and mulattoes instead of Maltese?  Is there a two-year-old child who would give any other answer if it were explained to him?  Is it any more complicated than a two-year-old child could understand?  Do you suppose, then, that the men doing it, ramming this down Maltese throats, men exactly like John Wadham, are ignorant of this implication of their acts, haven’t a clue what the outcome of their Stalinist acts will be? 

No there’s no paper trail.  None that I’ve seen at any rate.  But aren’t certain things obvious, one such being they know what they’re doing?  Can we say that must be true in the case of tiny Malta at least?

As Charles Bronson said in that film, “they can count.  All the way up to two.”  That’s all one needs in order to know perfectly the inescapable implications of what they’re doing.  Conclusion:  they know.  They know perfectly and they know with certainty.  I don’t need any paper trail to figure that much out.


Posted by Gringo Malo on Sat, 28 Aug 2010 20:14 | #

Jim Goad has interesting article entitled “<a href = “”>Liberals Ignore the Facts</a>” at Taki’s Magazine. He mentions an experiment in which the subjects only clung more fiercely their “erroneous” beliefs when confronted with contradictory facts. I myself have encountered such people. I’m afraid that those indoctrinated in the irrational ideas known as “White Privilege” and “White Guilt” cannot be corrected by rational argument, but I wish you the best of luck.


Posted by Armor on Sat, 28 Aug 2010 23:59 | #

From Gringo Malo’s link at Taki’s Magazine :
“A study recently published in Political Behavior addresses the topic of cognitive dissonance as it regards political beliefs. Titled “When Corrections Fail: The persistence of political misperceptions”.

“The researchers found that being fed corrective information failed to budge their subjects’ opinions and that, disturbingly, it often caused them to strengthen their erroneous beliefs. The researchers refer to this defensive tendency to double-up on disproved beliefs as the “backfire effect.”

I’d like to know what are the theories that can explain the backfire effect.

I have my own theories to explain why liberals ignore the facts. The first reason is that it is good for their careers. If they are consciously dishonest, they won’t mind our criticism. But if they try to lie to themselves and we confront them with the truth, the cognitive dissonance makes them squirm, and they may become bitter and jealous of our moral and factual superiority. Sometimes, it makes them dig their heels even deeper.

Some people who used to believe in the leftist hogwash are now having doubts. Even so, they have invested so much in it that it is easier to pretend to themselves that they are still believers.

Leftists could also be compared to gang members. If a gang member has been involved in a collective murder by multiple stabbing, or if a leftie has worked for some anti-white outfit, it is difficult for them to break out of the organization.


Posted by Thorn on Sun, 29 Aug 2010 09:34 | #

The cut, color, and clarity of Christan’s piece makes it a real gem. Yes, this is a keeper! Well done Christian Miller.


Posted by Leon Haller on Sun, 29 Aug 2010 10:27 | #

Good article, Mr. Miller. Kudos!

One caveat re Japan and immigration. They don’t receive immigration. It is not because they are ‘exempted’ by some shadowy cabal of nation-killing internationalist scum. It is because there is no large segment of native Japanese demanding ‘diversity’.

WNs like to say the West is being murdered, and there is much truth in that. But we are also, collectively, committing suicide. Japanese may be famous for honorable hara kiri, but they have no collective deathwish.


Posted by Armor on Sun, 29 Aug 2010 12:23 | #

WNs like to say the West is being murdered, and there is much truth in that. But we are also, collectively, committing suicide. Japanese may be famous for honorable hara kiri, but they have no collective deathwish. (—Leon Haller)

It is murder in that the driving force is Jewish and most non-Jews disapprove of what’s going on. You know more about that than most people. Still, I suppose you don’t like the idea of expelling Jews. And you keep insisting that part of the problem is our collective deathwish. Talking like that makes you a suicidal accessory to the Jews. It is suicidal to accept the suicidal thesis. In your place, I think the Japanese would have no qualms expelling the Jews. That is because they have no collective deathwish.

More seriously, I don’t think you are suicidal at all. I think you want to be respectable, avoid any harshness to the poor Jews, and avoid too much blame to yourself. In fact, you are the same as everyone else. Other people are not suicidal either.

• Most people are firmly anti-immigration.

• A minority of people are asocial and like to wreck phone boxes, and set fire to cars and houses. It doesn’t mean they are suicidal.
Wikipedia: Motives for vandalism.
I think some people in the pro-immigration movement have similar motivations.

• The behavior of most white people who participate in the destruction of the white race has more to do with cannibalism than suicide. They do it to gain a personal advantage.

• People who accept immigration out of cowardice and conformism, or because they are afraid to hurt the feelings of the poor non-whites, cannot be described as suicidal.

What we have is: murder + cannibalism + cowardice + stupidity + a measure of mindless vandalism

From now on, we should avoid any mention of “suicidal do-goodism”.
Instead, we should say: cannibalistic do-goodism.

As a book title, I agree that “The suicide of the West” sounds better than “The cannibalism of our phony elites”. Suicide has something tragic and romantic. By contrast, cannibalism is disgusting and sordid. Even so, that’s what’s happening to us.


Posted by Gudmund on Sun, 29 Aug 2010 14:10 | #

It is because there is no large segment of native Japanese demanding ‘diversity’.
>Leon Haller

As Armor says above, the majority of our people do not demand such things.  How is it then that a relatively small group of our people is so raucous in their activism for the same?  Yockey knew why, he called this element the ‘sub-Cultural stratum’ which has always existed in the West.  He correctly noted that in the context of authoritarian States, as existed in all of Europe until the latter half of the 18th cent, these elements cannot work their subversion with any success.  However, in the context of America and the rest of the modern West, the regimes find this same element very serviceable to their aims.

In light of the fact that their active support is actually quite limited, we can infer that the enemy regime is in a deceptively weak position - they rely on their invisible money-driven influence from above and their liberal and colored underclass from below.  The great mass of people have interests contrary to theirs and if they could but be made aware of this fact, their awakening would endow a pro-White movement with untold strength.  Our largest problem is people like the conservatives in America and their equivalents in Europe who divert the energy of large numbers of disaffected Whites into the causes of impotent controlled opposition (i.e., Tea Party in America, ‘culturist’ rather than racialist nationalism in Europe, etc).  Since we lack the ability (funds, ‘legitimacy’, etc) to organize on a mass-scale like they can, GT and Maguire’s idea of from-the-bottom-up political organization is the only approach which makes sense.


Posted by Silver on Sun, 29 Aug 2010 21:28 | #


If they refuse to come clean and say why they want it, we’re entitled to speculate on what their reasons for wanting it must be.  If they don’t like our speculations let them come clean and say why they want this for the country.  Until then we’ll continue to say why we think they want it.

But they do say what they want: multiracial diversity.  They consider it a good thing.  Good things come from shaking up traditional norms, as they see it.  They figure they’re supplementing the existing population, not supplanting it. 

It mightn’t be obvious to a “two year old” but it’s obvious to anyone with a brain.  I mean, come on, how the hell is it possible for you to insist that a person who gets a fat as a result of overeating can only possibly have overeaten in order to get fat?  That’s what your logic amounts to, Fred.  Worse, its effect is rabble-rousing of the most disgusting sort.  Look at “hearfelt’s” comment above.  Ready to kill, he claims.  His mind’s clear, he says.  See a non-white, you shoot him.  Nice and simple. Don’t complicate things.  Just tell me who to kill and I’ll kill.  (Is that not what he’s saying?  Am I misunderstanding him?)


Posted by Silver on Sun, 29 Aug 2010 21:33 | #

Christian Miller,

That is, the systematic eradication of the African people - African genocide.  No rational Black man will agree with such a genocidal campaign.  No reasonable Black man will stand by and cheer on the destruction of his or her fellow Africans.

Nonsense.  There are countless blacks who promote race-mixing.  It’ll be the “genocide” of blacks, true, but they promote it nonetheless.


Posted by Reginald on Sun, 29 Aug 2010 22:04 | #

Nonsense.  There are countless blacks who promote race-mixing.  It’ll be the “genocide” of blacks, true, but they promote it nonetheless.

It won’t be the “genocide” of blacks in Africa…

I doubt there are any Blacks who agree with the promotion of race-mixing in Africa.

In contrast, there seem to be many Whites who agree with the promotion of race-mixing in Europe.


Posted by Armor on Sun, 29 Aug 2010 22:08 | #

Silver: “But they do say what they want: multiracial diversity.”

They give all kinds of crazy and contradictory justifications. My favorite is the one that says we need more Blacks to compensate for the declining number of white babies.

Silver: “See a non-white, you shoot him.”

I think Fred Scrooby is right: it’s becoming difficult to reply anything to the nonsense you write.


Posted by Robert Reis on Mon, 30 Aug 2010 01:57 | #

But unlike the anonymous Newsmaxer, I went beyond simply pointing out that the morgue figures showed that blacks hadn’t disproportionately died following Katrina, but that whites had, and that the only credible explanation, based on what was known about the anarchy at the time, was that racist blacks were hunting them down and slaughtering them, just as they had sought to slaughter white rescue workers.

Given that supposedly only 10 percent or less of the people left in town were white, and over forty percent of the dead were white, whites were dying at over four times their proportion. And that doesnt even take into consideration that whites were reportedly concentrated in “safer” places. Thus, I am convinced that blacks were on search-and-destroy missions, hunting down and murdering whites.”

After the Louisiana death figures were released, the mainstream media suppressed the story of the issue of the proportion of whites who met their end in New Orleans, and suppressed reporting on pre-Katrina criminality, while uncritically reporting scurrilous black charges of anti-black genocide.


Posted by Fred Scrooby on Tue, 31 Aug 2010 00:59 | #

In a 2006 speech, Frenchman and WN theorist Guillaume Faye discusses his vision of “Eurosiberia” as an alternative to the present world-historical Eurospherewide demographic cataclysm:

I am very happy to speak again before my dear Russian friends, during this conference whose goal is to reflect on the fundamental ethnic and historical solidarity that henceforth must link all peoples of European origins in the 21st century.

We are entering a world in which the very old historical and national rivalries between all our peoples must be dialectically surpassed and replaced by a global unity.  For we will face common threats of immense magnitude against our identity and our survival.  This necessity constitutes a historical metamorphosis.

My talk will define the nature of these grave threats; explain the central role which Russia could play in this new alliance of all peoples of European origin; clarify the new concept of Eurosiberia — the union of peninsular Europe and Russia — and of ethnopolitics, i.e., the radical modification of world geopolitics by the introduction of the ethnic dimension; then, based on a risky but perhaps relevant forecast, I will propose the idea of the Septentrion, which is perhaps a revolutionary extension of the ideas I have expressed.  Finally, I will conclude with the major historical role Russia will have to play in this process.

The French Revolution and its consequence, the Soviet Revolution, are only minor historical episodes compared to what awaits us.  These two “revolutions” pose only secondary problems.  Today we must face the crucial questions which condition our survival as people of European origin.  For millennia we have not faced a “state of emergency” (the Ernstfall of the political theorist Carl Schmitt) so tragic.

The Diagnosis

All peoples of European origin are in constant demographic retreat.  For the first time in our long history we are being invaded by massive and uncontrolled immigration from other continents, and we are not reproducing ourselves.  This immigration, which is connected with a true replacement of our population, is also the third and most severe attempt of Islam to conquer the European continent.  This reinforces the opinion I expressed in one of my books, L’Archéofuturisme, that the 21st century may well be that of the “shock of the past,” of a challenge rising again from depths of history and memory, far removed from the phantasms of “modernity” in its communist or liberal versions.  It is the return of the “eternal present” of which Nietzsche spoke, i.e., of the invariance of human history, of the clash of civilizations, imperfectly anticipated in the United States by Samuel Huntington and more pertinently explained in France by Professor Pierre Vial, a historian present at this conference.

I suggest that this clash of civilizations actually amounts to the confrontation of the white race with all the others.  If nothing changes, in the middle of the 21st century, i.e., in a generation, peoples of European descent will be minorities in their own lands, on our continent and even in America.  This tragic upheaval had been implicitly envisaged by Oswald Spengler in the 1920s (The Decline of the West) and by Pierre Chaunu and Jean Raspail in the 1970s (The White Plague and The Camp of the Saints).  The diagnosis for our civilization and our ethnosphere is death, pure and simple, if no unforeseen doctor emerges to cure us.

[Continue reading: ]


Posted by Fred Scrooby on Tue, 31 Aug 2010 01:06 | #

Important comment by Robert Reis a couple above, posting a Nicholas Stix excerpt with an extremely ominous message for white people.


Posted by Armor on Tue, 31 Aug 2010 12:28 | #

Frenchman and WN theorist Guillaume Faye discusses his vision of “Eurosiberia” (— F.Scrooby)

This immigration, which is connected with a true replacement of our population, is also the third and most severe attempt of Islam to conquer the European continent. (—G.Faye)

In fact, the Muslims and other third-world immigrants are being invited. Mainly by Jewish activists. There is no attempt of Islam to conquer anything.

The endogenous and thus primary causes of this evil are internal spiritual pathologies of European peoples: ethnomasochism (hatred of oneself) and xenophilia (love of the foreign) which lead to cynical or naive collaboration with the enemy, mercantile materialism and unbridled individualism, egalitarianism, the inversion of values, the loss of memory of traditions as well as the future, emasculation and confusion of sexual roles, moral melancholy and morbidity dissimulated under a factitious and simulated optimism, loss of the aesthetic sense, etc. (—G.Faye)

Who prevents the resistance by healthy-minded Europeans ?

in Europe, neo-totalitarian legislation represses all those who wish to resist and encourage all that is morbid and decadent. (—G.Faye)

Who passed that legislation? Who passed the “hate-laws” and the anti-“revisionist” legislation? Who is responsible for the fact that white people are described as oppressors by the media, school, and government, while Jews are described as an oppressed minority?

one of the causes of this pathology is the “viral” influence of secularized Christian morals, based on universal charity, egalitarian cosmopolitanism, a culture of repentance, shame of oneself and sin, as well as a delirious, unrealistic conception of “love.” (—G.Faye)

How come the problem remained manageable in the past, when Popes didn’t feel they had to placate the Jews?

How can these ideas be put into practice? I don’t know. But I know what is essential: to communicate them, to make them known. “Revolutions in the heart” found “revolutions in reality.”  (—G.Faye)

On the practical level, the first thing to do is to launch non-Jewish media and to put a stop to the Jewish over-representation is our key institutions.


Posted by Leon Haller on Thu, 02 Sep 2010 05:58 | #

Posted by heartfelt on August 28, 2010, 04:15 PM | #

I’m with Leon @ August 26, 2010, 07:01 PM, on doing rather than theorising. On the issue of political organisation, revolution, and liberation war, I think Whites need to look into their soul and ask themselves, would you be willing to organise and mobilise as a people and if forced to do so commit extreme actions in defence of your family, your people, your country? Are you man enough and clear-eyed enough to overcome the intellectual and moral qualms about standing up in the real world? For White people, this is all it comes down to!!! That’s it. We are not in a difficult dilemma here, folks. Once you accept the moral necessity of revolution and its attendant behaviours, then the process simply becomes a question of, How? Where? When?


Sorry I missed this. So many threads, I lose track of where I am.

I definitely agree on the ‘primacy of the practical’, which is not said to disparage the more intellectual among us. My ‘practical’ understanding is perhaps more evolutionary than heartfelt’s revolutionary attitude, however. I suspect there almost certainly will come a time when some white men, somewhere, will have to fight for racial survival (and I’m not talking about merely those in an American prison). But before we reach that point, both of desperation as well as supreme possibility, all of us in our various capacities will have had to have done a lot of groundwork, at least if something broadly racially constructive can be expected to issue from such struggle.

What I’ve suggested in recent weeks re: “WN emigration/conquest” is an example of this. It’s very easy to get overly enthusiastic when one is sounding off amongst his kameraden in cyber-beerhalls like MR. But later one awakens, the music is silent, and the dawn is grey. At that point one has to think of the gritty details of implementing one’s proposals. Thus, for example, my emphasis on language familiarity when considering WN emigration. Because with language familiarity come much greater professional opportunities - and that tethering of our race-survivalist strategies to the ordinary business of life is what will turn idealistic aspirations into real, if always somewhat messier than planned, achievements.


Posted by Leon Haller on Thu, 02 Sep 2010 06:27 | #

It is murder in that the driving force is Jewish and most non-Jews disapprove of what’s going on. You know more about that than most people. Still, I suppose you don’t like the idea of expelling Jews. And you keep insisting that part of the problem is our collective deathwish. Talking like that makes you a suicidal accessory to the Jews. It is suicidal to accept the suicidal thesis. In your place, I think the Japanese would have no qualms expelling the Jews. That is because they have no collective deathwish.

More seriously, I don’t think you are suicidal at all. I think you want to be respectable, avoid any harshness to the poor Jews, and avoid too much blame to yourself. In fact, you are the same as everyone else. Other people are not suicidal either. (Armor)


I’m not altogether sure of what your criticisms are of me from the above, except that I am too soft on Jews. The latter may be true, as I am influenced by my having a large number of Jewish friends, including many racial conservatives among them (I also have a large number of anti-Semite friends). On the other hand, if you read everything I write, I’m pretty blunt (including with the aforesaid Jewish friends) about the damage Jews have done to the US and the West. But unlike the majority here, I do hold out the possibility that more Jews could be converted to Occidentalism, especially as the overall racial situation continues to deteriorate. Jews may aggress against white EGI, but non-whites have no love for Jews at all. I sense the possibility of a mutually beneficial alliance.

As for the suicidal stuff, you are sadly wrong (believe me, I wish it were otherwise). Maybe “suicide” is too strong, too intentional. But “apathetic” is on the mark. I know at least three things. In 2000 white Americans could have voted for Pat Buchanan, but didn’t. OK, too little info, desire to beat Gore, whatever. But in 2002 (I think), the French had the chance to vote for LePen. THERE WAS ABSOLUTELY NO EXCUSE NOT TO. Less than a fifth of the electorate did so, despite the clear evidence of France being colonized by savages. How can you explain that? Murder? “Cannibalism”? Nonsense!!

The French majority felt that accepting mass l’immigration sauvage was better than voting pour le raciste. I call that suicide (ditto the non-BNP vote this year in UK).

You, and those WNs in agreement with you, just can’t deal with the fact that our race has degenerated into one basically of morons and lickspittles; in a word, losers. I’m trying to preserve our blood purity and territorial sovereignty in the hope that, centuries hence, our race will have sloughed off the snakeskin of liberalism, and returned to its ancient greatness. But we need to survive this period of degeneracy if that is ever going to happen.

Oh, and I am respectable - and WN will only succeed when its public face likewise becomes respectable. We tried the skinhead approach in the past. For all the tough guy rants, it failed.


Posted by Leon Haller on Thu, 02 Sep 2010 06:35 | #

The great mass of people have interests contrary to theirs and if they could but be made aware of this fact, their awakening would endow a pro-White movement with untold strength.  Our largest problem is people like the conservatives in America and their equivalents in Europe who divert the energy of large numbers of disaffected Whites into the causes of impotent controlled opposition (i.e., Tea Party in America, ‘culturist’ rather than racialist nationalism in Europe, etc).  Since we lack the ability (funds, ‘legitimacy’, etc) to organize on a mass-scale like they can, GT and Maguire’s idea of from-the-bottom-up political organization is the only approach which makes sense. (Gudmund)

I don’t disagree. But I stand my ground. Whites as a race are simply more ethical than other races, and this translates into greater concern for the ‘feelings’ of others, as well as greater vulnerability to race-based guilt-mongering. Even many whites who agree with us (that importing diversity is undesirable) are ashamed of their feelings, and certainly think it immoral for us to organize to advance our EGI, even if the cost is national suicide. Hence my oft-stated belief in the vital importance of establishing the morality of WN, which for me in the American context, means reconciling WN with Christianity.


Posted by Armor on Fri, 03 Sep 2010 01:18 | #

Maybe “suicide” is too strong, too intentional. But “apathetic” is on the mark. / … / You, and those WNs in agreement with you, just can’t deal with the fact that our race has degenerated into one basically of morons (—Leon Haller)

What you don’t explain is how white people in every Western country have degenerated into suicidal, apathetic morons. It is a very strange simultaneous development. I don’t think White people are so different from one hundred years ago, but the human mind has its limitations. If we had freedom of speech in the media, a vocal, more visible movement against immigration, and an army that white people could join to save their nations, there would be no lack of idealists willing to give their lives.

Most people who fought in the Great War about a hundred years ago didn’t volunteer. They were drafted. There was already a problem with European elites at the time. For example, the religious hierarchy didn’t do much to stop the killing. But it is worse now. We no longer have political and moral elites. People are on their own against a hostile media and government. It is much harder than in the past.

Many anti-immigration activists describe themselves as former leftists. I don’t think they would say that they used to be suicidal before they became white dissidents. Maybe their absence of revolt was due to “mechanicity” (GW has used that word). It seems that we need to go through a sort of conscious rebellion before we become able to defend our white interests.

I did vote for Le Pen in 2002, but I knew he would not be elected. I’ve always been against immigration, but I realize that the government and media propaganda has a huge impact, even on people like me. People will make up all sorts of different and contradicting reasons why they should not vote for Le Pen, not realizing that they are trying to rationalize their conformism to the propaganda from the media.

Many people are much more deeply opposed to immigration than Le Pen is. Those people could not be described as suicidal, but they like to think of themselves as moderates, and they are uneasy about Le Pen because of his media reputation as a nazi. As a result, many of them end up voting for crooks and race traitors.

The power of propaganda is huge. A good example of that is what happened in France in the beginning of the Aids epidemic. Blood products contaminated with the Aids virus were distributed to haemophiliacs in 1984 and 1985. (wiki). It has been said that the men in charge became too preoccupied with money and profitability. Actually, I think the whole mess was largely a result of the huge propanda campaign by the (mainly Jewish) far-left against stigmatization (wiki) of people affected with the virus. Because of the huge pressure by the activists, I think the scientists could no longer be relied upon to give sensible advice. In fact, the far-left is responsible, in many different ways, for the death of a great many people from the Aids disease.

In the same way, our (non-)leaders can no longer be relied upon to say or do anything against the population replacement.


Posted by Abelard Lindsey on Fri, 03 Sep 2010 16:24 | #

The fact that the Japanese are not criticized for the immigration policies is not entirely true. Occasionally some U.S. liberal-left academic weenie will rant and rave about how evil the Japanese are because then plan to compensate for the lack of lower skilled workers with robotics and automation. There was a fuss over this issue in the New York Times a few years ago. The Japanese just blow it off.

There is actually a fair bit of illegal immigration in Japan because companies hire people under the table (and sometimes exploit them). The government is trying to put a stop to this but has been ineffectual.

What is not so well-known is that there is considerable cross-cultural marriage among rural South Koreans, mainly with Filipina wives. In fact, nearly 50% of kids growing up in the rural parts of South Korea are mixed-race (mainly Korean/Filipino mixes). The girls of these relationships ought to be quite attractive when they grow up (around 2020).

Nevertheless, the rest of the posting is quite correct. The Western (“white”) nations seem to have considerable self-imposed political pressure to take in large numbers of immigrants, often from cultures that are completely incompatible with Western culture.

BTW, an iman in the Netherlands called for Geert Wilder to be decapitated yesterday. So much for cultural assimilation.


Posted by CS on Fri, 03 Sep 2010 17:17 | #

I read the Iman calling for decapitation is actually in Australia.


Posted by Abelard Lindsey on Fri, 03 Sep 2010 18:14 | #

I read the Iman calling for decapitation is actually in Australia.

I stand corrected. Nevertheless, large numbers of people from cultures incompatible with Western values are being imported with no regards to future consequences. Needless to say, this is unacceptable.


Posted by Lurker on Fri, 03 Sep 2010 23:41 | #

Abelard - the difference, it seems to me, between illegals in Japan and in white countries is that they are present only under sufferance, nothing more. Any time the state wishes to deport them - out they go. No appeal, no citizenship, no claims about their rights. Any children they have while in Japan will not be Japanese, no anchor babies, no chain migration.

I’ve read of this Soth Korean thing too, importing wives, I thought Vietnamese women also figured as well as Filipinas. Either way they have been careful not spread their ethnic net too wide. No Indians, whites or Africans etc need apply apparently.


Posted by Fred Scrooby on Sat, 04 Sep 2010 17:47 | #

Further to my comment of Aug. 29, 2:32 PM:  the reason for Cavalli-Sforza’s political coyness about race bordering on race-denial may be fear that if he acknowledges race the other side might retaliate by looking into his wartime germ-warfare research conducted in Axis laboratories.  Clearly that sort of attack on him by the other side could cause him huge headaches if not complete ruin, positively the last thing any sane man would want to be forced to deal with at his age, as he approaches the end of his long life and career.

I guess I can understand that.  The fault lies not with him but with the same ones who are responsible for our own choosing to post under pen names — the ones who’ll pay and pay dearly one day, if there’s any such thing as justice in this life, and I think there is.

And I do mean dearly.


Posted by majix on Sat, 04 Sep 2010 20:44 | #


“But they do say what they want: multiracial diversity.  They consider it a good thing.  Good things come from shaking up traditional norms, as they see it.  They figure they’re supplementing the existing population, not supplanting it.”

They’re lying. Words are used to diguise their true intentions. If you don’t believe me read their own words in the protocols.

They do not want multiracial diversity for THEMSELVES but only force it on others. The jewish wealthy elite live in gated communities. Israel itself is one big gated jews-only community.


Posted by Fred Scrooby on Wed, 08 Sep 2010 23:55 | #

Holland’s Queen Beatrix keeps appointing a radical foaming twitching race-replacement advocate to powerful positions.  Why?  Who are her advisors and what is their ethnicity? 

From the Who the fuck are Beatrix’s advisors? department (God I hope they’re not [fill in the blank] ________ , otherwise between them and this bimbo queen, the nation formerly known as Holland is royally screwed):

Queen of The Netherlands shows her multicultural colours again

The figurehead of multicultural ideology

The heraldic colour of the Dutch Royal family is orange.  But ideologically the present Queen Beatrix’s colour is red, and in the present day and age that means she supports multiculturalism.

After the negotiations for a right wing coalition ran into the ground last Friday, the chairman of the negotiations, or informateur, Mr. Ivo Opstelten, had to give up his position.

The Queen then appointed another informateur.  It is the second time he’s been appointed.  The previous time, he had to chair the negotiations for a left wing coalition.  It is Tjeenk Willink, the Head of the Council of State.  After Tjeenk Willink spoke to all the left wing last time he made a final report to the Queen as is his job.  He added an addendum stating that in order to protect the core values of The Netherlands it would be necessary to maintain the principle of non-discrimination ridgidly, even down to immigration policy.  This means that Mr. Willink favours continued mass immigration in the face of the considerable electoral victory of anti immigration parties, the Freedom Party (PVV) and the right liberal VVD.  [Scroob note:  specifically it means Willink favors biologically extinquishing Dutchmen by swamping their tiny country with wholly inappropriate volumes of the racially unlike.]

Incredibly this ideologue has now been appointed chair of the new round of negotiations again.

PVV’s Geert Wilders has already called for Tjeenk Willink’s replacement.

Things fall apart, the centre cannot hold

Dutch society is losing its anchors.  Political parties and politicians are weakening, as is the judiciary, the police and the Church.  The Queen, by expressing her favorable opinion of multiculturalism so strongly and in such partisan fashion, is undermining another anchor of Dutch society:  the Monarchy.  Society is splintered and unstable, and the people at the top are hastening the unravelling of the social and political fabric.  It is an incredible spectacle.  Greatly saddening.

[ ]


Posted by Fred Scrooby on Thu, 09 Sep 2010 08:20 | #

“Society is splintered and unstable, and the people at the top are hastening the unravelling of the social and political fabric.  It is an incredible spectacle.”  (—Snouck, in the log entry I pasted just above)

It is coming from the top, and it is an incredible spectacle.  The people don’t want it.  Only the ones at the top do.  Whom are the ones at the top listening to then?  What voices are they hearing?  They’re not just doing all this the way they do anything else, they’re doing it with a fervor, a tenacity, a stubbornness amazing to behold, almost a kind of desperation that they have to get it done, have to see it to completion, right in the teeth of what they know to be the people’s strongly unfavorable view of it all before the people gather enough strength to stop it — otherwise they wouldn’t have gone to all the trouble to implement all those draconian, totalitarian “anti-hate” laws and regulations punishing the questioning of it:  they know perfectly that the people don’t want it.

Whom are the Queen and the others at the top listening to in this beyond bizarre, beyond nightmarish, beyond criminally insane crusade they’re on, a crusade to biologically, permanently eradicate people of European race?  We see the same insanity in the Queen of Great Britain.  Are they all reading Alon Ziv or something???  Are they all secretly Jews???  Are they all secretly card-carrying communists???  What in the god damn FUCK is going on???


Posted by Fred Scrooby on Fri, 10 Sep 2010 13:15 | #

”What in the god damn FUCK is going on???”  (—my comment above)

FJ gives a few answers today over at

the leaders of the European Union have been promoting Third World mass immigration, including Muslim immigration, as a long-term policy for decades.  Similar policies are no doubt at work in North America.

[…] we are also dealing with a self-appointed transnational elite in power throughout the Western world who are consciously and deliberately trying to dismantle Western nation states using international law combined with massive propaganda campaigns, “anti-racist” brainwashing of people of European origins and above all mass immigration.

[…] The problem with the Western oligarchs is that they are actively hostile to the long-term interest of the white majority population.  China is an oligarchy, too, but despite their numerous flaws the Chinese oligarchs today are arguably better at promoting the long-term interests of their people.  At the very least they are not deliberately mass importing hostile tribes who immediately proceed to rape their daughters and stab their sons.  Western elites do this on a daily basis.  It would be interesting to analyze the motivations behind the evil actions of the Globalist Multicultural oligarchs of the West, but this has to await a later essay.

Multiculturalism is in some ways almost more totalitarian than Communism.  We just didn’t realize this at first.  In Norway, Khalid Salimi, a Pakistani “anti-racist,” complained about the fact that too many white natives peacefully enjoyed music at a festival together in their own country.  This wasn’t “diverse” enough.  Soon whites will literally be banned from congregating in separate groups.  I no longer consider this a joke.  The “conservative” President Sarkozy has said publicly that native Frenchmen have to mix with immigrants.  It is thus mandatory in France to import Africans and breed with them.  Not even Stalin did this.  In the modern West, the state wants to regulate who we have sex with and from which ethnic group.

Communist societies were based on fear.  So are Multicultural ones.  The control mechanisms are normally more subtle, to be sure, but they exist.  What happened was not that totalitarianism died with the Cold War, but that non-lethal means of manipulating and controlling the masses were perfected within the West.  We don’t have a Gulag, but (white) people constantly live in fear that saying something “racist” could end their careers.  Yet this “fear of being called a racist” is currently weakening.

[ ]

FJ is slowly piecing together the puzzle.  He’s connecting the dots.  Slowly.  But he’s making progress.  In about thirty more years he’ll be where I was around the end of 2005.  Hey better that than his previous stance of “Islam 24/7/365 yesterday today tomorrow now and forever nothing but Islam that’s all that exists.”

Islam is not the main problem.  The main problem is government-enforced race-replacement of white people Eurospherewide.  By itself Islam is not a problem at all.


Posted by Armor on Sat, 11 Sep 2010 10:15 | #

Fjordman: “Communist societies were based on fear.  So are Multicultural ones.  The control mechanisms are normally more subtle, to be sure, but they exist.”

In the last days of the Soviet Union, the population did not live in fear as during the 1930s. They had nothing to fear as long as they didn’t engage in politics. The same is true today in the West. We are asked to accept our collective destruction, but we are not individually targeted unless we become active dissidents, and even then, we are unlikely to get killed. Fjordman will not be shot down by ZOG agents if he writes that there is a Jewish problem.

I agree that Western democracies have become dictatorships. It is unclear how ‘democratic’ our countries were in the past, but we didn’t use to have hostile elites. The race-replacement crisis has less to do with leftism than with intimidation and direct action by authoritarian rulers who simply ignore popular opinion.

We have race-replacement because our governments import millions of immigrants, not because society has become imbued with leftism. The Jews have not succeeded yet in making us leftist and anti-White. They have simply succeeded in making our governments import millions of non-Whites. This is direct control over government, not ideological control over society. In fact, it’s not really direct control of government either. Obama, for example, is not Jewish. Bush was not Jewish. But the crucial thing is the Jewish string-pulling exerted on our rulers and on the election process. The crucial thing is not the leftification of the Zeitgeist through Jewish control of the media and other institutions.

Even though the crucial thing is control of government by string-pullers, control of the media is also useful to disrupt and prevent communication, to prevent a White rebellion, to decide who gets elected, and to give the impression that the government is responding to public opinion. In the same way that Jews are involved both in right wing and left wing political parties, they are involved both in government and in the media, with the effect of creating a system of phony opposition.

I think we spend too much time blaming leftism, Christianity, and the psychology of the lemmings. We already know that many White people have a predisposition for loony impractical idealism. There is also a problem with conformism, as Jewish media propaganda tends to be wrongly perceived by White people as peer pressure by other Whites. But our psychological defects do not explain where the government’s anti-White ideology comes from. In spite of the heavy propaganda, most people are still against immigration. The government simply ignores them. That’s why we need to study how dictatorship works.

We need to understand better how a small number of people are able to hold a whole nation prisoner. The USSR was an example of this. In the final years, no one in the Soviet Union believed in communism any longer, but for some reason, the regime still remained in place.

Unlike Fjordman, I don’t think that ‘our elites’ generally believe in the necessity of race-remplacement. I think the problem comes only from a small minority of Jewish string-pullers. It should be all the more easy to break their power. We need to investigate what’s going on behind the scenes. We need to see who is most active in inner political circles, where the money comes from, how Jews get together to appoint their own people, how Jewish anti-white organizations are financed with public money, and so on. I think most of the information is available, but we need to spread the news and express outrage. We also need to start protesting against the over-representation of Jews in key institutions. People already know about that, but they are afraid to protest. It’s based on fear, as Fjordman says. Even people on our side will argue that the problem of Jewish activism is well known, but is not crucial. They are more comfortable arguing that there is something wrong with white people, and with leftism.


Posted by Fred Scrooby on Sat, 11 Sep 2010 11:42 | #

Yet another outstanding comment by Armor.


Posted by Fred Scrooby on Fri, 17 Sep 2010 08:34 | #

“But what about the Swedes who invited her?” 

What about the Jews founding, funding, and running whatever NGO was responsible for launching the insane initiative?  What about the Jews in the U.S. State Department who ally with such NGOs by among other things exerting pressures both gentle and not so gentle on other countries to facilitate this sort of multiculti insanity?

“OK but what about the Swedes who go along with it?  Is somebody holding a gun to their head?”

They’re the same nutcases who’ve always existed in society and been relegated to the background by the normals.  Who’s puffing them up now and pushing them to prominence to their delight and society’s downfall?  Three guesses.


Posted by Fred Scrooby on Fri, 17 Sep 2010 08:39 | #

“Also, do you notice the exaggeratedly ‘nice, sugary-sweet’ manner this witch affects?”  (—my comment)

Similarly to another Jewish race-replacement advocate, Tamar Jacoby.


Posted by Fred Scrooby on Fri, 17 Sep 2010 10:58 | #

From the <u>What in the god damn hell is going on?</u> department:  Michael O’Meara offers a few partial explanations:

They’re killing us with their freedom.

Every dissolution of social order, every assault on the family, the unrelenting denigration of authority and heritage, and now our biological replacement by the Third World’s refuse — all justified, legislated, and celebrated in freedom’s hallowed name.

What, though, is this freedom whose ethnocidal ramification threatens what is arguably the greatest tyranny of all:  Extinction?  [Scroob note:  everyone remember how in every one of The Chimp’s speeches he used the word “freedom” over and over and over till you thought you were going to vomit if he said it one more time?  O’Meara’s next sentence explains what The Chimp was referring to by that word.  Turns out it was not what we all thought the word meant.]

The simple answer:  It’s the false freedom favored by liberals, Jews, capitalists, and New Class operatives indifferent or hostile to peoples of European descent.  The philosophical/theoretical answer is somewhat more complex, but not substantially different in essence.  In both cases, the reigning “freedom” bears little relation to an authentic notion of freedom.  That the prevailing system of individual rights — ”freedom” — has made a small number of people, some not of European origin, very well-off and very engaged in keeping us under their thumb, explains much of its dominance.

But there is also something in the history, culture, and declining Being of our people that disposes them to seeing themselves in ways that leave them indifferent to their survival as a race and a culture.

Most symptomatic of this identity-destroying disposition is liberalism.

As an ideology it rejects all collective, historically-formed, and blood-based identities, privileging an individual disconnected from history, heritage, and kin — an individual who first demands to be treated in respect to his accomplishments rather than his birth — but who, eventually, becomes simply an abstract individual, neither white nor black, male nor female, young nor old — who exists entirely for himself, cut off from those who came before and those who might come in the future — ”an atom without connection.”

On the basis of this individualistic fiction, liberalism rejects affiliations of all kinds, positing a world of unrelated but homogeneous private ego-subjects situated in a realm of unrestricted circulation, such as a market, where each — in the name of rationality — behaves according to his immediate benefit.

Alien to every ancient and medieval concept of communal decision-making or self-rule, liberal freedom comes to favor what John Gray calls “an assured space of individual independence” — devoted to personal and private, not familial, communal, or ethnoracial, rights.

[


Posted by Armor on Fri, 17 Sep 2010 11:06 | #

For those opponents of race-replacement who squirm in their seats with feelings of embarrassment, anger, and outrage when they hear fellow WNs mention the Jewish role in inflicting multiculti on relatively Jew-sparse Europe (“God, can’t the anti-Semites just shut up?  They’re embarrassing us, giving us a bad name, and ruining our WN movement!  Jews certainly have NOTHING to do with what’s going on with multiculturalism in Europe!  It’s entirely Europeans doing it to themselves!”) (—Fred Scrooby)

In countries other than Sweden, over-sensitive WNs do not necessarily contest that Jews play a part. But they think it is bad taste to mention the problem, except if it can be proven that Jewish anti-white activism is the sole explanation. If Jewish anti-white activism is only 90% of the problem, then nothing should be done about it. For example, nothing should be done about the huge Jewish over-representation of Jews in the media. Over-sensitive WNs are like failed conservatives: they like to compromise.

Is somebody holding a gun to their head?

I ask myself the same question about WNs who refuse to blame Jewish activism. There is something wrong with them in the same way that there is something wrong with most people who disapprove of race-replacement, but do nothing about it.


Posted by Notus Wind on Fri, 17 Sep 2010 12:13 | #


Thank you for pointing out the O’Meara article.


Posted by Rusty on Fri, 17 Sep 2010 13:21 | #

Armor and Fred, I share your frustration.

Over-sensitive WNs are like failed conservatives: they like to compromise.

The modifier “failed” here might be redundant.  For, conservatives are always ready to compromise; it’s one of their defining characteristics.  This decade’s dogma is tomorrow’s revelation, and they will not even remember what they used to believe or how they have changed. 

Conservatives can only feel their way backward and have no vision looking forward.  They are the sheep whom Jesus talks about. Fortunately, enough will know a truly good thing when it comes along.  And if Palin and Beck can grab this large of an audience, think of what a true patriot, a real man, could do.


Posted by Fred Scrooby on Fri, 17 Sep 2010 19:06 | #

As I post this there are 119 comments underneath that video of that unspeakable Jewish woman, and it’s very gratifying to see almost none of the commenters is fooled by multiculturalism or by individuals like that terrifying woman.  Essentially all the commenters understand the simple and by now obvious truth that the goal of the multiculturalism currently being forced on them is their own genocide, genocide backed to the hilt by certain organized groups: .

The commenters all seem to understand that.  Very gratifying comments thread.


Posted by Drifter on Tue, 17 May 2011 21:49 | #

Hunter’s latest blog series at OD is worth reviewing for all of the documentation collected on race based wealth redistribution and violent crime inflicted against European Americans as a group.


Posted by Nationality: Swedish. on Mon, 26 Sep 2011 17:40 | #

All this debatting, it has been talked about for many years now. Nothing happens, the same old “We must take action before its to late”. Well I can understand that, making a change isn’t something you do with a hand turn. Charasmatic organizers are needed, but at the moment it seems like most of the politicans, newspapers and the media is controlled by fucking socialists who I would love nothing more but to watch >someone< slit their throats.

Anything started with a bullet can be ended with a bullet. The question is, when will we have the balls to do it?


Posted by Nikki on Fri, 21 Oct 2011 13:17 | #

Why are white people always frightful of the most stupid things.


Posted by Horatio on Thu, 08 Dec 2011 01:37 | #

Can you eleborate Nikki? are you saying White genocide is something White People shouldn’t be concerned with? Are you an evil non-White who revels in the fact that White people are only 8-9% of the world’s population and are forced to accept a global herd of the other 92% of the world’s people, while all the other races of people get to keep their more or less homogenous nations? all the other races are allowed to preserve their countries for their own children, while White children won’t have one place on earth to call their own. Or are you a self-hating tratorious White anti-White? Which non-White populations do you INSIST ‘mix’ and ‘blend’ out of existence in their own countries? Or are you ONLY Anti-White?

It’s b/c of stupid, apathetic people like YOU why things that can be resolved without violence turn into very violent wars; because your world view is limited to your own thick fucking head.


Posted by Horatio on Thu, 08 Dec 2011 02:09 | #

I had no idea there were WN’s who were “over-sensitive” to implicating Jews who are guilty of the crime of White genocide, and “over-senstive” at pointing out the grossly disproportionate responsibility of Jews. The last thing a Pro-White should be is Politically Correct, LOL. However, before anyone can be brought to tribunal, the point of White genocide must be engraved into an ever larger number of people’s skulls. One way, just one way of doing it is entering forums and exposing anti-Whites and their genocidal intent to the audience/the public. I believe concentrating on the point (the obvious truth) of White genocide is more effective than obsessing about Jews, news, crime and IQ’s. Once the point of White genocide, the truth, is justly shoved down the throat of the MSM, the governments, the schools, etc, all the pieces will fall into place, and history will have been turned on its head, again. And this time, the anti-Whites will be buried, FOREVER.


Posted by Jesus the Answer on Thu, 29 Mar 2012 01:14 | #

Why is race mixing promoted in every white nation? Every white nation on earth is flooding with browns & blacks and race mixing is promoted in all of them. If whites speak out against race mixing and show any white pride for their race they are automatically blasted by the media & the browns & blacks as being racist. No other countries on earth is this happening but white countries and it seems to be by design.
Arab countries for Arabs.
Asian countries for Asians.
White countries for EVERYONE!
Consider the below and the Bible makes more sense of why God ordered the killing of every Cannanite man, woman, child & infant & told Israelites if they did not kill them all that every land they dwell in with them they would be as a thickle in their eye & thorn in their side. Of course Israel did not have the stomach for killing infants & children so they left many alive.
My opinion is Whites are God’s chosen people the Israelites.
Jesus said in the latter days we would be hated above all others for his name sake.
Every christian nation on earth is Caucasian nations, no other nations claim to be christian nations.
God said he would bring every nation against Israel/Jacob so this may mean more than just the the nation Israel. He said in the covenant with Abraham he would scatter his seed all over the earth and he would give them lands were they art a stranger and they would be many nations & many kings. Jesus also said to a woman, “What have I to do with dogs, I come “ONLY” for the lost sheep of Israel”. So Jesus did not come for everyone as the church has been preaching for the last 500 years. They misinterpreted preach the gospel to every nation “Every KINDRED” every tongue. A study of the bible & other ancient history proves Satan has children on earth also. Gen 6:4 says these fallen angels took Adams daughters and sired the Nephilim from them. The Mighty men and fallen angels are most likely the ones who built the pyramids on earth. Olmecs & ancient Pharaohs were black and about every nation on earth shows blacks were there long before anyone else. Non-white races came from these fallen angels who fathered all the black headed peoples on earth.
How do I know Adam was white?
The hebrew word Adam in Strongs Hebrew concordance reads like this.
Strong’s #119 ‘adam aw-dam’ to show blood (in the face), i.e. flush or turn rosy:—be (dyed, made) red (ruddy).
God promised many nations & many kings to Abraham, Isaac & Jacob/Israel.
Saxons is the short english word for “Isaac’s Son’s”
The 12 tribes of Israel came thru Jacobs 12 children. Here is a description the bible gives of Jacob/Israel
Isaiah 29:22 That is why the LORD, who redeemed Abraham, says to the people of Israel, “My people will no longer be ashamed or turn “pale” with fear.
Till this day the Indians still call us PaleFace.
Jonah 3:8 says, And let man and “beast” be covered with sackcloth, and let them make strong prayers to God: and let everyone be turned from his evil way and the violent acts of their hands.
Does anyone really believe this is talking about 4-legged beast?
4-legged beast do not have Hands nor can they pray like a man and turn from evil. Did the early church fathers really put sackcloth on donkeys & oxen? That’s stupid.
This is 2-legged beast the bible is talking about.
Genesis says Satan was more subtle than any “beast of the field” the Lord God had made.
Do we really believe Satan who has way more knowledge than Adam being the most powerful angel in heaven was more cunning & crafty than any cow or oxen in the field that the lord God had made? That just sounds stupid.
These are 2-legged beast the bible speaks of and the hebrew name is not beast of the field it is Nachash.
Jeremiah 31:27 Tells us this.
“Behold, the days are coming, declares the LORD, when I will mix the house of Israel and the house of Judah with the seed of man and the seed of “BEAST”
Men & women have had sexual relations with farm animals for thousands of years.but the seed was never mixed to produced an offspring from these unholy unions.
There is a beast that can mate with Adamites that will produce children according to this scripture.
Revelation 6:8
And I looked, and behold a pale green horse: and his name that sat on him was Death, and Hell followed with him. And power was given unto them over the fourth part of the earth, to kill with sword, and with hunger, and with death, and with the “BEAST” of the earth.
The original greek says Pale Green Horse and this is the color of Islam.
It has power over one fourth of the earth, Arabs are one fourth of the earths population.
Beast of the earth will help the Arabs kill. Cows? These Beast of the field that help them kill are the peoples other than Arab who the Arabs are recruiting to Islam. The movie Predator has a line that says, “The enemy of my enemy is my friend. Sound familiar.
God destroyed everyone on earth but Adam & his family “because all flesh had corrupted it’s way upon the earth”. Race mixing of Adamites with fallen angels & the Nachash “beast of the field”. Noah’s was the only pure Adamite bloodline left.
Luke 17:26 “Just as it was in the days of Noah, so will it be when the Messiah returns.
Contamination of Adamites was Satan’s plan to prevent the Messiah from being born, who had to be pure Caucasian Adamite like the physically pure lamb for paschal sacrifice. The one who will “Crush his Head”. Now the world is full of mongrels just like in Noah’s day when God killed an earth full of hybrids but Noah & his family, The only pure adamites left on earth. Jesus is our only hope. He came for ONLY for the lost sheep of Israel (His words, not mine).


Posted by Nehemiah Peckinpah on Sun, 24 Jun 2012 18:33 | #

Britsh Israel must be ture elsewise everything about America is false! Daniel Boone’s son was israel


Posted by Anthony Biry on Thu, 16 Aug 2012 16:46 | #

Well, I respect your right to have an opinion.
However, I must ask: Even if a bunch of non-whites move into white countries, does that mean that they are going to mix races? There are always going to be single race couples, and there always will be different races. No one is forcing people to mix races, they do it on their own. If we were forcing people to only marry people of other races, it would be a different story.
Also, I don’t believe race matters. I am 1/4 asian and 3/4 white, but it’s not something I bother anyone with. Personally, I think we should all embrace culture and learn from the mistakes of the past, and enjoy the rich heritage all humans have. However, I also believe we should not let the place our ancestors came from change who we are. A person cannot choose to be one race or another, just as one cannot effect the color their eyes are, or what types of fish are indigenous to their region. We should take what we want and need from the past, and use it in the future, and forget the rest. All humans were originally black, but through the spreading of peoples and mutations causing races, and evolutionary adaptations, race developed. Blacks are really the purest race, because things like pale skin and light hair or eyes are mutations through albinism and similar phenomenons.
Who someone is inside matters more than the color of their skin or the shape of their eyes. We are all human beings, and no one is born worth more than another.
I am against rights being given to certain people simply based on ethnicity, though, as I am against the discrimination of any people. People should be allowed to marry any person of an appropriate age they want to, no matter of their race, cultural standing, or sexual orientation. We as humans should stop with the ridiculousness we insist matters and try our best to discover what lies ahead.
Adam and Eve were the first humans. They populated the earth with their children, as did Noah and his family. Through that one should realize we are all brothers and sisters of the earth, and we should not fear those who look different, because we all originate from the same place.
And, just so you know, Adam and Eve were black, as were Noah and his family. Anthropology tells us that, as two black people can make a white baby through albinism, but two white people can not make a black baby. And, as god made Adam in his image, it isn’t too far to venture that god would be black. And, well, black as night, as one can get lighter through mutation but not darker. So, technically, we are all black, just mutated and evolved.


Posted by daniel on Thu, 16 Aug 2012 18:41 | #

Anthony Biry says,

And, just so you know, Adam and Eve were black, as were Noah and his family. Anthropology tells us that, as two black people can make a white baby through albinism, but two white people can not make a black baby. And, as god made Adam in his image, it isn’t too far to venture that god would be black. And, well, black as night, as one can get lighter through mutation but not darker. So, technically, we are all black, just mutated and evolved.

Anthony Biry, you are an idiot.

Of course we could evolve to become black again, but it would probably take just as long as it did in differentiation from them - 41,000 years - to revert to our more aboriginal, monkey-like forms, color and behavior.

But why would we want to do that?

Stupidly, you have nothing to say of the behavior of Blacks. Have you ever lived among them in numbers? If so, and if you do not mind it, then please go and stay with them. It is a difference that matters infinitely to the normal White people who have experienced them.

What evil nonsense you toss out that we are all the same.


Posted by Alicia on Sun, 20 Jan 2013 21:21 | #

I’m not quite sure about other countries but the United States of America and the rest of America had people her before the white people came and attempted genocide on the natives.  After that they gave them small plots of land to live on in their own land which the continually moved and shrank.

Off the subject of hypocrisy.  I know that I’m African American and the situation is different for other races but my ancesters were dragged here against their will and forced into slavery.  That doesn’t sound like someone is trying to wipe out the white population by means of intergration to me.  Before someone gets started on segregation -“Seperate but Equal”- it was not and can never be equal, one side would have always had an unfair advantage.  For example, say there were black schools and white schools and you knew that the black schools had better books, more supplies, and more space for smaller classes so that these children would get a better one on one experience, wouldn’t you be upset?  But I digress, would you say that I don’t deserve to be here as much as any other person who was born here, or would you say that I should be sent back to a land that neither I nor my great-grandparents ever set foot or have knowledge of any culture or language (by the way that can also be attributed to slavery, as the beat or murdered anyone caught remebering their culture)?  But as I said earlier in the pargraph that’s just my ancestry.

On the subject of willing immigrants the United States of America began as a set of immigrant colonies, a rather violent and ungrateful set of immigrant colonies.  Before and when the U.S. became an independent nation, it was not only open to immigration but encoraged immigration.  The people who came and still come here came for a better life, following the American Dream, your family came here for a better life a long time ago (unless they were in a penal colony or were Africans dragged here as slaves).  Many people wanted to see the place where “all men are created equal”.  The U.S. slowed down on immigration because it no longer had a extremely low population.  But none of this truely matters when I get to the real reason that I believe you are mistaken.

We are all people, we all have emotions, needs, and our own problems.  There really isn’t even much difference in those problems, white people can be poor and so can black people.  As for violence and crime, it’s the poverty, people with less eduaction are less likely to be able to get a job and support themselves so they tend to turn to crime as a means of living.  Education itself is less encouraged among African Americans and Latino immigrants than it is among white people in their own homes, by the media, and by society in general (this is a sad result of conditioning).  No one group has a basic predisposition to be better than another.  All people are created equal, it just depends on what you consider a person.  Don’t try to play the victim to make racism seem ok, no one is forcing you or your children to intermarry, no one is forcing you in a place where the living conditions are poor, no one is physically or mentally harming you, no one is killing you, no one is stealing your children, and no one is trying to prevent you from giving birth or getting someone pregnant (yet some of the white people of America’s past have done four out of five of these things).  To villanize your victim is domestically abusive significant other’s tactic try not to do it.

We hold these truths to be self-evident, that all men are created equal, that they are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable Rights, that among these are Life, Liberty, and the Pursuit of Happiness. That to secure these rights, Governments are instituted among Men, deriving their just powers from the consent of the governed


Posted by DanielS. on Sun, 20 Jan 2013 22:33 | #

“no one is forcing you in a place where the living conditions are poor, no one is physically or mentally harming you, no one is killing you”

Yes, they are.


Posted by Thorn on Mon, 21 Jan 2013 19:38 | #

Off the subject of hypocrisy.  I know that I’m African American and the situation is different for other races but my ancesters were dragged here against their will and forced into slavery.

After seeing Africa, Mohammad Ali proclaimed: “I’m glad my great grand daddy got on that boat!”

Gee, I wonder why he’d say such a thing?

Any guesses, Alicia?






Posted by Thorn on Mon, 21 Jan 2013 20:07 | #

If life imitates art, then Lagos, Nigeria was inspired by Hieronymus Bosch’s paintings of Hell.


Posted by Humbug on Tue, 07 May 2013 04:30 | #

The real destroyer of whites is wealth and decadence. Obesity is just the most obvious manifestation of this problem.

Whites are so wrapped up in individualism that their relationships suffer and they no longer have any sense of community. With birth control and “free sex”, it’s no wonder whites (and non-whites who act like whites) aren’t breeding anymore.

The fastest way to implode Third-World countries is to make them rich. Then they too can enjoy decadence, free love, men and women who hate each other, and demographic implosion.

Frankly, I fear that the entire human race is too smart for its own longevity. We haven’t been able to break free from the tyranny of evolution, and maybe we never will. If it’s any consolation, all of the religious nutters who emphasize procreation, such as our very own Amish, will probably repopulate the world. No more iPhones, though; it’ll be back to horse and buggy.

And Thorn, that video in your link includes Seoul as a Third World country. Not only is South Korea not a Third World country anymore (its GDP/capita is nearly equal to France’s), but its population, like Japan’s and Western Europe’s, is shrinking. I’m guessing Channel 4 news is some white supremacist infomercial?


Posted by Alice Slone on Sun, 09 Jun 2013 07:04 | #

Couple of things that made me shake my head.

“Educated, self-reliant, and law-abiding White American taxpayers…”
Are you saying only “white american” people are taxpayers? (And may i add that “educated, self-reliant” is completely and utterly REPULSIVE to say? Are you implying your “White Americans” are the ONLY people who are educated and self-reliant??) EVERY person pays taxes in this country. People who have a social security number pay taxes in their monthly/bi-weekly checks, claim, and get money BACK. People who DON’T have a social security number pay taxes in their monthly/bi-weekly checks, claim, and GIVE money to the government, for the simple fact that they are UNDOCUMENTED. They don’t get money back. (“Undocumented” is the correct word to use in this society. If you are going to post such an attacking article, AT LEAST make it POLITICALLY correct, as you are wanting people to listen to you. “Illegal alien” is not only rude, but also discriminatory.)

“...these White taxpayers work hard but are forced to financially support criminals, illegal aliens, and welfare abusers.  The taxes paid by hardworking White citizens are transferred to illiterate illegal aliens to bankroll large broods of anchor babies that will produce an ever-increasing amount of welfare obligations and future criminals.”

In case YOU didn’t know, “illegal aliens” are NOT given the same rights as the “legal people” in this country. They are not granted access to ANY welfare. Many can’t go to the doctor’s office or the dentist’s office because of the expenses. This country ONLY gives welfare to people who present a social security number. Remember that is asked for in a welfare application?? Or ANY application at that? Also to say “illiterate illegal aliens” is repulsive. Being once an “illegal alien” myself, I sought after an education, PAYED my way through college (because “illegal aliens” aren’t given any money for college, ahem) and am now successful. YOU are completely wrong, sir.

Next time you want to write an attacking article as this one, please take in consideration that “white citizens” are ALSO illiterate, criminals AND on welfare. Here I am in 2013, thinking racism has ended. What a pitiful way to prove you “white citizens” are “above” these “illegal aliens”.




Posted by DanielS on Sun, 09 Jun 2013 07:30 | #

Alice, are the people here trying to pretend not be concerned for White people, are they trying to pretend not to be “racist”?

Don’t you see the point? The concern here is for people of European descent and their ways of life.

There are hundreds of places where you can go for your “anti-racist” and “undocumented worker” talk.


Posted by Sam on Wed, 12 Jun 2013 23:21 | #

I live in america. The fact is people are going to do what they are going to do. It comes down to freedom of choice. The illegal immigration part of this article is seemingly sidestepping the real issue. Overwhelmingly when i see interracial couples in america over 50% actually i would say closer to 65% of the interracial couples i see are a white woman and black or Asian man. It is sort of demonic in origins i believe. Recently i walked by an attractive young white woman and said hi while she did not even respond and not to be arrogant but i am a better than average looking white male i bench press around 300 lbs and am 6 foot tall weighing 190lbs. I am clean shaven with a mustache and short hair . Not long after i walked past the woman who wouldn’t even speak to me , i turned and saw her cutting it up with an african american male. Which i can totally understand to see from time to time but at the rate it happens now and when i see good white men being totally ignored and in fact white men who come from great stock from generations and generations of military fighting families who helped build this place and helped build the old countries of britian and europe get totally ignored by women of their own race for someone else just because the color of his skin it is sad. Because no-one knows the plan better than the white man here in america kids are taught from their early age that white men are racist and wicked and they are the devil That is what you hear all the time on the news tv shows movies what have you.  No matter what they say we owned slaves better than 145 years ago and we owe them and every other race with our money and our women.  Regardless of the fact that at least 80% of all men who fought and died in wars for american freedom were white. They will just say that blacks weren’t allowed to fight which totally ignores the sacrifice that was made by the white men in america.  The illegal immigration issue is just icing on the cake for the anti white movement. They are already breeding out the white women and have been for a decade and a half now fill in with some other non white Latino’s and surely whites will not be the majority then. But the peacefull way to approach this is just for the white women to allow themselves to be assimilated into another race forgoing and threat to their lives. We have already been shown through oj simpson that black men will get away with murdering white women if they decide to leave them for a white man. So there you have it yes the white race is disappearing and i dont see anyone standing up and doing anything about it. Maybe it is gods will . . . . .


Posted by DanielS on Thu, 13 Jun 2013 00:07 | #

Sam, I know what you are saying and I have experienced that kind of pattern many times.

However, you acknowledge that it is largely the result of cultural conditioning and then you say there is nothing that can be done.

This sentence in particular makes no sense:

“But the peacefull way to approach this is just for the white women to allow themselves to be assimilated into another race forgoing and threat to their lives.”

I wonder if you are disingenuous, simply here to give bad advice by instilling passivity inot other White men.

I have lived in America and I have lived in countries that are all White, where the women do like their White men (it took a while to get used to that!)

The right thing to do is not to passively accept mudshark behavior but to separate from it.

Either you, as White men, get away from them or you force them to live in their mud.

If the muds and mudsharks think they are better than us, they don’t like our “racism”, fine - then they do not need to live with us.


Posted by GuitarMan on Tue, 02 Jul 2013 13:31 | #

When you people finally learn that it’s the Jews who are doing genocide to all white countries, then maybe you’ll all get together to stop them dead in their tracks. If not, the White Race will cease to exist anywhere !!!

The extermination of the White Race is what the Jews have always aimed for and always will and the only way they can do that is grab all the guns and cause the ignorant Whites to race-mix !!!

“The goal of abolishing the white race is on its face so desirable that some may find it hard to believe that it could incur any opposition other than from committed white supremacists. The key to solving the social problems of our age is to abolish the white race. Make no mistake about it, we intend to keep bashing the dead white males, and the live ones, and the females too, until the social construct known as ‘the white race’ is destroyed, not ‘deconstructed’ but destroyed.” - Noel Ignatiev (Dr. Ignatiev is a JEW Harvard “Professor” and the founder of a journal called “Race Traitor”, which has as its motto, “Treason to Whiteness is Loyalty to Humanity.”)

“We will openly reveal our identity with the races of Asia and Africa. I can state with assurance that the last generation of white children is now being born. Our Control Commissions will, in the interests of peace and wiping out inter-racial tensions, forbid the Whites to mate with Whites. The White Women must cohabit with members of the dark races, the White Men with black women. Thus the White Race will disappear, for the mixing of the dark with the White means the end of the White Man, and our most dangerous enemy will become only a memory. We shall embark upon an era of ten thousand years of peace and plenty, the Pax Judaica, and our RACE will rule undisputed over the world. Our superior intelligence will easily enable us to retain mastery over a world of dark peoples.” ~ RABBI RABINOVICH’S SPEECH OF JANUARY 12TH, 1952


Posted by Thorn on Tue, 02 Jul 2013 17:04 | #


Thanks for your contribution, but this is MR. All you’ve said is old-hat here.


Posted by Thorn on Wed, 03 Jul 2013 17:59 | #

Well, since this WN site has gone dormant, how about a little entertainment?


Posted by LOLWUT? on Sat, 13 Jul 2013 09:53 | #

So this is what white people do in their spare time.

Okay here’s a simple solution. If you want the white “race” to be preserved (let’s conveniently ignore centuries of race intermingling) then how about you tell all the lil white girls to stop slobbering over black cock? How the hell are you going to blame all black people because little blue eyed Brittney thinks its cool to piss off daddy by bringing home a stereotype?

I like to see all races and ethnic groups. Black, White, Aboriginal, Hispanic, Asian.

Apparently white people do not and think we should all stick to fucking our on race indefinitely till the gene pool is so small you can’t even dip your toe in it. Why not just give Adolf the Nobel Peace Prize right now?

And not just that, (I can care less what happens 10,000 years from now) some of you can’t even grasp basic genetics. Just because a black person and a white person have a kid doesn’t make the baby black or the genes go away. Half the time the mixed baby looks white. And the light skin, light eyes or whatever makes you “white” get passed on to another generation. Look at Black kids with green, hazel or blue eyes!

My point is just because lil Brittney gets knocked up and something like Obama is spawned doesn’t mean the end of the white race.


Posted by DanielS on Sat, 13 Jul 2013 11:14 | #

Lolwut, you are missing the point. The point is that we don’t like you and your ways of life. Nor do we consider mulattoes, quadroons or even octoroons to be our people, the people that we care about - more, they provide a gateway to people like you, whom we despise, primarily for your monkey-like behavior, your violent and ugly ways of life.

We are attempting to do something about the mudsharks; we are taking steps to ostracize them. We do not accept them, their activities have been imposed against the will of our better thinking people. Our capacity to defend ourselves has been hobbled in recent history with the tactlessness of the Nazis; the machinations of Jews as they pass for White; along with the sympathetic pass they got for the past few decades; add the hegemony of liberalism and conscientious White men had been in a position where it was exceedingly difficult to take corrective measures - but corrective measures will be.


Posted by Madison Polley on Fri, 19 Jul 2013 20:56 | #

ACTUALLY, WHITES DID NOT “DISCOVER” AMERICA. IT WAS ALREADY “DISCOVERED” BY NATIVE AMERICANS, WHO GOT KILLED OFF IN WHAT CAN DEBATABLY BE CALLED A “GENOCIDE”. This whole Whit genocide thing , is not actually a genocide. No one is killing off whites. And unless they are killed off or decide to relocate themselves, there will be no decrease in whites living in one place. Just because there is an increase in other races in the same place, does not imply the vise versa for whites.


Posted by Lurker on Fri, 19 Jul 2013 21:00 | #


So there are no native Americans left now - after the genocide?


Posted by Roepstem on Sat, 20 Jul 2013 20:46 | #

Please sign and share:


Posted by Rax24 on Sun, 28 Jul 2013 20:13 | #

When the Europeans came here there was nothing but a Jungle and a Desert.  They built the colonies then the States then a Federal Government and all the institutions. Whatever you see today and whatever you touch and all the benefits you get is because of Whites otherwise you would have nothing.  This is our Country now, a White Country and Whites will remain in charge forever.  This my hope.The fact is that Whites have been too generous in allowing inferior people to enter our advanced society and now they’re paying us back with their violence and intimidations. Only if we can get those 40% of Whites who are still in the now anti-White, anti-American Democratic Party to where they should be and vote conservative, the same stupid Whites who elected and reelected anti-White Barack Obama then we could change this downfall toward what the site owner calls it “White Genocide”. At this moment,however, any political solution will not change much the degradation already in progress. What we need is the intervention of the White Military in order to reestablish Constititonal Government because White Dictators in Congress and in the U.S. Supreme Court have caused our demise and they must pay for this traison.
Whatever course the destiny will take it’s not going to be a happy one. We, Whites, will never integrate and have anything to do with those uncivilized within us who are on record as saying that they’re waiting for us Whites to become a minority, to push us aside and take over all of our instititons. Eventually,and unfortunately, what it’s going to happen is that we’re going to have 500 Tribes in what is now the United States of America.  The United States will cease to exist as we know it…unless we fight back now.


Posted by AM on Sun, 08 Sep 2013 14:57 | #

In South Africa white genocide is out in the open. White farmers and their entire families are being wiped out (including babies and the elderly) and Gregory Stanton from Genocide Watch International has classified these attacks as anti-white hate crimes. Victims are hacked to pieces with machetes, drowned in boiling water, have boiling oil poured down their throats, are raped with broken bottles….More white farmers have been murdered in SA since the ANC came into power than in Zimbabwe. In 2012 whites of SA have been placed on stage 6 out of 8 stages of genocide by Genocide Watch. There is public anti-white hate speech by the government, including incitement to murder. The president himself, Jacob Zuma, sings ‘kill the boer” in public, even though the song has been banned as hate speech. WHites are not allowed to gather in groups of common interest which are often culturally defined, yet blacks are encouraged to do so. That’s why it’s ok to have a “black lawyers association” but not a “white lawyers association”.

Does the world care? No. They say we deserve it due to apartheid. Yet the history of SA has been distorted and is being lied about in order to favour the plans of the illuminati-backed communist ANC. Let me tell you, the whole thing was a sham. The transition of power from black to white in 1994, the “iconic” Mandela, the “rainbow nation” - it’s all a huge illuminati inspired sham.


Posted by AM on Sun, 08 Sep 2013 15:00 | #

correction last paragraph: the transition of power from white to black in 1994!!


Posted by Kellin on Mon, 09 Sep 2013 20:26 | #

Everyone on here who keeps bringing Jewish people up… RELAX. Most Jewish people ARE in fact white. Must we make it all about religious differences within white populations, or is this about mass immigration? Because the lass time I checked there isn’t mass immigration of Jewish people into Countries, it’s mostly Arabs/Muslims and Asians(Chinese etc), I don’t think any Jewish person would ever wish Arabs on other Jewish people.

The biggest anti-Semitic group that exists today are Arabs/Muslims. So to those of you who are saying that Jewish people are the ones who INVITED the Arabs here, you’re dead wrong. The fact that Arab lands have SO much oil and the fact that corrupt WHITE politicians want money at the expense of the general population is what invited the unwanted immigrants. Some of you people can’t live without mentioning and blaming the Jewish people.

Most Jewish people I’ve met are whiter than most of the people on this thread, so please check yourself, before you wreck yourself. If you can’t stand the mass immigration, leave it at that. No need to revert to religious wars, that is just counterproductive.



Posted by Anon on Sun, 15 Dec 2013 08:34 | #

Someone should upload a succint poignant viral Anon video with Guy Fawke’s mask.


Posted by The Insider on Sun, 19 Jan 2014 17:24 | #

Jews are not white. They are not western people. Among themselves they make it very clear to their offspring that they are JEWS.  Within the Jewish culture, it is a Core Belief that ONLY JEWS are “people” (beings made in the image of ‘God’), everyone else is “goyim” (animals;  cattle to be used in service to Jews).

This is extremely for White people to understand, because the actions that stem from this Jewish belief, and how it is linked to what the Jews call “the covenant of Abraham” (the basis for Jewish identity, at the root of Judaism).

Prior to the “covenant of Abraham”, Jews would sacrifice their own offspring to propitiate their gods.  After the covenant was established, Jews were only to sacrifice and kill animals, not their own offspring as an offering to their god.  Many people today believe that “animals” means sheep, goats, bulls, etc. But that is because they are not Jews.  TO a Jew, any non-Jew is also an animal, and as animals, they can be sacrificed (ritualistically murdered).  TO ensure that Jews would only ritualistically murder the children of non-Jews, the ritual of circumcision for male children was instituted. This served as a ‘marker’ to separate Jews (“God’s chosen People”) from non-Jews (goyim: animals;  cattle).

For thousands of years, there have been stories of Jews murdering non-Jewish babies , all vehemently denied by Jews of course.  But one has to wonder why such reports and accounts have persisted for millennia, and keep recurring in all white nations, if there is really no substance to them. 

After WW-2, Jews established their nation, Israel, in what was Palestine.  The Zionist Jews who founded and still run Israel have made no secret of their hatred for Christians. They insist that Christians killed six million of them during WW-2. IN Hebrew, but never in English or any other “white nation” language, the Zionist Jews in Israel vowed to seek blood retribution against the White Christian people.  The Jews expanded (or extended) their ‘Covenant of Abraham’  to implement a genocide of all White and Christian people so that they would “never again” have their property seized, or have their control of the world and its people interrupted. 

The evidence for these Zionist and Jewish objectives (destroying White nations and implementing genocide) is abundant.  All White nations were pressured by Jewish bankers, Jewish intellectuals, and other Jews, to implement open immigration laws – to allow a flood of non-whites in; all white nations education curricula were revised to declare white people evil, and Christianity to be a scourge upon the Earth; every form of degeneracy and corruption was encouraged —as a form of “liberation”;  and there was a militant effort to force homosexuality and abortion on all White nations by the Jews.

Abortion is the modern expression of the “covenant of Abraham” in ALL white nations today.  The Jews have hated Christianity ever since it was founded nearly 2000 years ago, and they now use abortion as one of the main tools by which they can eradicate Christianity (and Christians) from the Earth. The other major strategy used by the Jews is the aggressive promotion of homosexual agendas (especially to children in white schools) …

IN ALL white nations, Jews have promoted abortion and fight tenaciously to keep it legal, through the full term of pregnancy.  Jews have spent decades developing propaganda in the media they control to convince white girls and women that killing their babies with abortion is the greatest right that women have—and today, many (if not most) white girls believe that going to an abortionist to have their babies killed is much more important than finding a husband, marriage, raising children, knowing how to use guns to defend themselves, or anything else in life. In fact, thanks to feminist ideologies—all rooted in Judaism, and all heavily promoted in the Zionist controlled American media – white girls now equate marriage and raising children with ‘slavery’ and buy into the Marxist model which claims that bearing children is a way of “oppressing”  women —never mind that it is a biological imperative to ensure survival of the race.

Thanks to Jewish abortion, over 40milion white babies have been ‘aborted’ (ritually murdered by Jewish abortionists) since 1973.  The militant feminist and homosexual propaganda with which the Jews have been polluting America and every other white nation’s culture will result in total eradication of White People by the end of the 21-ST century if it continues on its present course.

It is a fatal error for whites to continue to deceive themselves that A Jew is Another “White person”, when the Jews themselves believe that they are NOT white, and that real white people should all be eliminated –with abortion, homosexuality, or in a new global war engineered by Zionists to get White and Aryan people to kill each other off – so that in the aftermath, the Jews will rule the world and there will be no others to challenge or stop them.


Posted by zeitgeist2012 on Sat, 29 Mar 2014 21:56 | #

We white Christian folk built this great Republic. Now your neoliberal multiculturalist subversive comrades have bankrupted us in an attempt destroy us out of racial competition or jealousy with a vicious need to rob us and destroy what we built in order to elevate your own race or create a new mongrel race, culture, and form of govt to replace ours…

Dr. Tarpley reviews the writings of John P. Holdren, the current White House science advisor. This interview conclusively exposes scientific elite’s true agenda, world-wide genocide and the formation of a global government to rule.


Posted by Louis on Fri, 27 Jun 2014 15:22 | #

i’m thinking 99% of the black responses on here are Jews doing what Jews do. Pretending to be anything but a Jew. The 1% that are actually black are still doing the work of the Jew. If he were representing the black race, how can he not support the truth. Why would he volunteer to take the ass whippin that is owed to the Jew?


Posted by Aj on Tue, 23 Sep 2014 18:53 | #

I believe that you have tried to defend white peoples improperly. White people as a whole and all white blood should be systematically removed from the population. Not integration or assimilation but full blown genocide where all whites at birth are made to not be able to reproduce via removal of internal sex organs. Those that are alive should be dealt with EXTREME prejudice on a fine line between inefficiency and the utmost pain and suffering. We as whites should be forced to endure conditions that make the holocaust look like a vacation. We must be made an example have our flesh removed and be dipped in acid. We need to suffer and then ultimately not exist at all even the bloodline to be removed from history and change the books so that we never existed at all. We are a virus and must be removed.


Posted by Eurocide on Thu, 16 Oct 2014 13:22 | #

White genocide in motion:


Posted by Al Rex on Sat, 29 Nov 2014 14:40 | #

To be honest, at this point in time, only two things in each White Country can change the course of events:

1-The intervention on our behalf of the Military (Armed Forces)
2- A total uprising by the people.
I don’t see any possible or forthcoming political solution


Posted by White guilt on Tue, 13 Jan 2015 16:02 | #

As a half white half Hispanic (German mom’s side / South America dad) I support this movement.
Anyone who promotes white genocide is basically attackingy my mother and her heritage.
I grew up in an all white neighbourhood and am a better man for it. The minorities have done nothing but bring their problems to n.america. Why not fix mexicos currupt cartel? Because the zi0nists want to fulfill abrahams prophecies and the white race stands in their way.

I will always side to the white race , my wife is Nordic , and our children will be closer to being pure in a few generations again as they marry white and only white from here on. It’s my small part to contribute for the cause.

On the streets some May mistake me as a Latino , except the facial bone structures are euro while being a darker tanned. My point is : there is a whole sector of Hispanics who are sick and tired of the ‘la raza’ propaganda , they give us half euro spaniard ppl a bad name . In the end anyone with some European blood in them will likely lean towards their European side naysay as I have .

Stop white genocide


Posted by Ericksonian technique on Tue, 13 Jan 2015 21:37 | #

While one is tempted to let this comment go, perhaps even should, it is important to take note:

There is a technique in Ericksonian hypnosis wherein an “obsession” (e.g. “stop White genocide”) is countered and subverted by introducing a little, seemingly humble change.



Posted by Juju Bee on Sun, 18 Jan 2015 19:55 | #

Eriksonian technique can be used to subvert serious consideration and instead to accept Jewish fall out.


Posted by Word from Orania on Tue, 26 May 2015 00:00 | #


  by Sebastiaan Biehl

(Mr. Biehl is a man of German origin, who settled in South Africa and took up residence in Orania. You can

read more about his interesting story here)
The government of South Africa, which is dominated by the socialist and black-nationalistic African National Congress (ANC), is busy with the second phase of their so-called “transformation” of our country. The second phase of their planned “transformation” is much more profound and destructive than the first phase. The first, transitional phase—which involved dismantling Apartheid—still left some space for Afrikaners, but the next phase, the so-called “National Democratic Revolution”, aims to wipe out any traces of white, especially Afrikaner history.


Posted by South African Whites seek return to Europe on Fri, 29 May 2015 02:58 | #

Appeal for right of return to Europe for South Africans:


Posted by White homelessness and peril in SA on Mon, 01 Jun 2015 11:10 | #

Paul Fromm returns from South Africa with a vivid account of the black communist government’s rule requiring 80 percent black employment in all industries, the consequential inability for many Whites to find work and homelessness; the continuous peril for Whites living in SA and their inability to leave the country despite these conditions.


Posted by Ann on Sun, 12 Jul 2015 14:19 | #

We need to form a political party and fast in the west.  People can not speak freely due to “offending” coloured people.  Elections are only and only about skin color.  Elections were never like this.  Elections are not based on skin color in eastern countries or countries with little or no immigration.


Posted by Kelsey Ewonus, 22 on Tue, 14 Jul 2015 11:32 | #


Posted by Dragged to death James Byrd stlyle: no media cover on Fri, 17 Jul 2015 05:07 | #

By Hunter Wallace

H/T Daily Kenn

This is one of those rare occasions when a black-on-white murder happens overseas that is so shocking, even by South African standards, that it is newsworthy in the United States where any number of similar black-on-white atrocities happen to White people on a daily basis, and we have to pick and choose which ones to feature:

  “In a brutal black-on-white murder that evokes memories of the death of James Byrd in 1998, a 23-year-old white man was dragged to death by a black male driving a small pick-up truck.

  News reports say Jared Lomas was grabbed by the collar as he left work at an Oyster Festival in the town of Knysna, South Africa.

  The attacker drove his bakkie past Lomas as he was walking to his car with a group of friends. Lomas was dragged along side the truck and died from the injuries sustained during the attack.

  The victim’s father was unaware of the attack or that his son was hospitalized when he was alerted that the college student had been murdered.

  Unlike the death of James Byrd, the murder of Jared Lomas has been ignored by the international media.”


Posted by Viking settlement on Hudson on Tue, 18 Aug 2015 03:36 | #

Viking Settlement Discovered near Hudson River
April 16th, 2015 | by Barbara Johnson

Stony Point, NY| A team of lanscaping workers, proceeding to an excavation near the banks of the Hudson river, has discovered the archeological remains of a Norse village dating from the 9th or 10th Century AD.

The workers were digging with a mechanical shovel near the shores of Minisceongo creek, when they stumbled upon the ruins of an ancient building. A team of archaeologists linked to Columbia University, was called to the site to inspect the findings, and they rapidly identified the site as a possible Viking settlement. They proceeded to extend the excavation, and have finally discovered the remains of six buildings.

The various structures are believed to have been constructed of sod, placed over a wooden frame. Based on the associated artifacts, the buildings were variously identified as four dwellings and two workshops. The largest dwelling measured 88 by 42 feet (26.8 by 12.8 meters) and consisted of several rooms, while two of the dwellings were much smaller and were identified as living quarters for lower-status crew or slaves. The two workshops for their part, were identified as an iron smithy, containing a large forge, and a carpentry workshop.

It is unclear how many men and women lived at the site at any given time, but the archaeological evidence suggests it had the capacity of supporting between 30 to 100 individuals, and that the site was inhabited by the Norse for a relatively short period of time.

The Norse smithy, still contained the remains of 10th Century tools and a small quantity of raw iron ore.

During their search of the site, the archaeologists have discovered nine skeletons, who were identified as four adult males, two adult females and three children. Only one of the male warriors had been given a proper burial, being placed in a tomb with his weapon and belongings. The other skeletons showed traces of violent injuries and seemed to have been simply left on the site of their death by the killers.

Many clues discovered on the site suggest that the Vikings could have come into conflict with the indigenous people of the region. Besides the skeletons that were found, who were most likely killed in combat, the numerous remains of native American weapons found on the site suggest the colony suffered a large-scale attack by indigenous warriors.

Several artifacts were also found on the site, suggesting the inhabitants of the site who survived the attack, must have left hastily. These include a dozen of pieces of jewelry, like brooches, pins and arm-rings, mostly made of silver and walrus ivory. The archaeologists also unearthed iron pots, potteries, oil lamps, tools, a whetstone, coins, as well as a few broken weapons and pieces of armor.

Dozens of silex arrowheads were found all over the site, suggesting the settlement could have been attacked by the ancestors of the Lenape tribe.

The Vikings were Germanic Norse seafarers, speaking the Old Norse language, who raided and traded from their Scandinavian homelands across wide areas of northern and central Europe, as well as European Russia, during the late 8th to late 11th centuries.

Using their advanced seafaring skills and their famous longships, they created colonies and trading posts throughout the North Atlantic islands, navigating as far as the north-eastern coast of North America. Another short-lived Viking settlement was already discovered in 1960, in present-day L’Anse aux Meadows, located in the province Newfoundland and Labrador, in Canada. The remains of butternuts found on that site, had indeed suggested that other settlements further south, because these nuts do not grow naturally north of New Brunswick.

The scientists believe that the settlement could indeed be the legendary Norse colony known as “Vinland”, mentioned in the Icelandic Sagas. Based on the idea that the name meant “wine-land”, historians had long speculated that the region contained wild grapes. Wild grapes were, indeed, still growing in many areas of the Hudson Valley when the first European settlers arrived in the region, so the archaeologists believe that this could really be the colony described in the mythological saga.



Posted by Petition for Afrikaner refugees on Sun, 13 Dec 2015 01:11 | #

Robert Stark interviews Rodrigo Herhaus de Campos

- Regarding his petition calling for the right of return for South African Whites.

- Separatist movement in the South of Brazil


Posted by White genocide message denied free speech on Sun, 20 Aug 2017 07:28 | #

Man with stop White genocide shirt escorted from free speech demonstration

Post a comment:

Name: (required)

Email: (required but not displayed)

URL: (optional)

Note: You should copy your comment to the clipboard or paste it somewhere before submitting it, so that it will not be lost if the session times out.

Remember me

Next entry: Declining marginal returns on investments in complexity: the thermodynamics of Olduvai
Previous entry: Sarrazin does it again

image of the day

Existential Issues

DNA Nations

Establishment Problem



Endorsement not implied.


Islamist Threat

Anti-white Media Networks






Historical Re-Evaluation

Controlled Opposition

Nationalist Political Parties


Europeans in Africa

Of Note


On the Rise of Mixed-Race Britain commented in entry 'Harry engages old colored woman, threatens to adulterate Royal line's representation of 41,000 years' on Sun, 10 Dec 2017 09:00. (View)

Shamychel commented in entry '“Do you like white women? Because we have a lot of them at Baylor, and they love football players."' on Sun, 10 Dec 2017 06:11. (View)

Ukwuachu commented in entry '“Do you like white women? Because we have a lot of them at Baylor, and they love football players."' on Sun, 10 Dec 2017 05:59. (View)

Shawn commented in entry '“Do you like white women? Because we have a lot of them at Baylor, and they love football players."' on Sun, 10 Dec 2017 05:38. (View)

Chafin commented in entry '“Do you like white women? Because we have a lot of them at Baylor, and they love football players."' on Sun, 10 Dec 2017 05:05. (View)

The Nation: The Alt-Right Looks Left commented in entry 'White Left Imperative to defense, systemic health of European peoples' on Sat, 09 Dec 2017 14:35. (View)

DanielS commented in entry 'Jez on great form' on Sat, 09 Dec 2017 04:34. (View)

National-Satanist commented in entry 'Jez on great form' on Sat, 09 Dec 2017 04:23. (View)

DanielS commented in entry 'Netanyahu Concerned Race-mixing to Destroy Liberal Jews and American support' on Sat, 09 Dec 2017 01:42. (View)

Merkel seeks 390,000 Family Reunification Visas commented in entry 'EP President Schulz: Germany exists only in order to ensure the existence of the Jewish people.' on Fri, 08 Dec 2017 04:23. (View)

Flynn, "we're going to rip-up those sanctions and" commented in entry 'Evidence of Trump-Russia Collusion Already Exists, Watergate Prosecutors Say' on Thu, 07 Dec 2017 18:44. (View)

(((Lauren Southern))) commented in entry 'Hardly The Battle of Cable Street: What Berkeley Doesn't Mean' on Thu, 07 Dec 2017 18:28. (View)

mancinblack commented in entry 'EP President Schulz: Germany exists only in order to ensure the existence of the Jewish people.' on Thu, 07 Dec 2017 12:20. (View)

mancinblack commented in entry 'EP President Schulz: Germany exists only in order to ensure the existence of the Jewish people.' on Thu, 07 Dec 2017 11:34. (View)

Schulz calls for United States of Europe commented in entry 'EP President Schulz: Germany exists only in order to ensure the existence of the Jewish people.' on Thu, 07 Dec 2017 09:24. (View)

Russia likely Israeli match-maker commented in entry '"Israeli Defense Minister: 'I Prefer ISIS to Iran on Our Borders"' on Wed, 06 Dec 2017 03:10. (View)

Russia cheated at Sochi, banned at S Korea commented in entry 'N.Korean threat/capacity, shows both determinism & social construction by contrast to southern twin' on Wed, 06 Dec 2017 02:52. (View)

Lyon Christmas market cancelled by cost of terror commented in entry 'Berlin terror attack: 12 dead, 49 injured as truck ploughs into crowd at Christmas market' on Wed, 06 Dec 2017 01:22. (View)

Islamic plot to kill PM Theresa May foiled commented in entry 'Weston disbands Liberty GB in favor of backing Anne Marie Waters For Britain' on Wed, 06 Dec 2017 01:08. (View)

Cernovich daggers & shields for the alt-right commented in entry 'Cernovich seeds FireMcMaster hashtag propagated by 600 most active Russian Twitter operative handles' on Tue, 05 Dec 2017 20:22. (View)

Iceland's green feminist PM commented in entry 'Occupy Hambach forest, another step toward pervasive ecology' on Tue, 05 Dec 2017 15:17. (View)

Trump plans to move US Embassy to Jerusalem commented in entry '"Israeli Defense Minister: 'I Prefer ISIS to Iran on Our Borders"' on Tue, 05 Dec 2017 14:08. (View)

mancinblack commented in entry 'Are Whites stupid, or what? Tara will be an epoch light out of the darkness, especially if...' on Tue, 05 Dec 2017 11:51. (View)

McCarthy hassled by Roosh V. et al. commented in entry 'Are Whites stupid, or what? Tara will be an epoch light out of the darkness, especially if...' on Tue, 05 Dec 2017 09:28. (View)

Didess42 commented in entry 'Are Whites stupid, or what? Tara will be an epoch light out of the darkness, especially if...' on Mon, 04 Dec 2017 22:29. (View)

Response to last minute, dark of night tax bill commented in entry 'The populist mask is slipping for Trump and the GOP' on Mon, 04 Dec 2017 13:24. (View)

Harry & Philip commented in entry 'Harry engages old colored woman, threatens to adulterate Royal line's representation of 41,000 years' on Mon, 04 Dec 2017 09:13. (View)

Shejusaho commented in entry 'black hyper-assertiveness' on Sun, 03 Dec 2017 10:18. (View)

She jus' a ho. commented in entry 'black hyper-assertiveness' on Sun, 03 Dec 2017 09:03. (View)

mancinblack commented in entry 'Occupy Hambach forest, another step toward pervasive ecology' on Sun, 03 Dec 2017 04:44. (View)

White woman with baby commented in entry 'black hyper-assertiveness' on Sun, 03 Dec 2017 01:09. (View)

Didess42 commented in entry 'UK population set to increase equivalent of three Birminghams in a decade, half of it immigrant' on Sat, 02 Dec 2017 22:48. (View)

Kushner un-hedged commented in entry 'Michael Flynn is the key to the Russia scandal — and he may have just flipped on Trump' on Sat, 02 Dec 2017 17:33. (View)

NFL to pay $89 million tribute to blacks commented in entry 'NFL protests: US propositional liberalism needs overturning, but blacks are not revolutionaries' on Sat, 02 Dec 2017 17:08. (View)

Trump tweet jeopardizes his presidency commented in entry 'Trump & Russia: 'Full Picture Is One Of Collusion'' on Sat, 02 Dec 2017 16:36. (View)