|
|
|
Strange bedfellows - Protests against the Durban II conference Our sturdy Danish colleague Balder has posted what he calls “a tribute” to Kevin MacDonald’s Occidental Observer piece from 29th January, The Global Anti-Semitism Report: The organized Jewish community opposes free speech. Balder’s piece is titled Strange bedfellows - Protests against the Durban II conference. He has circularised me with it, and I am pleased to post it in full below. GW ————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————- Censorship promotors behind the Durban II protests On April 20-24, 2009, in Geneva, Switzerland, the United Nations will host the “Durban Review Conference,” – a follow-up to the 2001 UN World Conference against Racism, Racial Discrimination, Xenophobia, and Related Intolerance (WCAR). The debate goes on whether we should participate in this conference or not The allegation is that Islamic countries, that apparently form a majority in this UN forum, are trying to use the conference to promote banning criticism of religion, especially Islam. Another concern from many parties, is that it will be used to one sided criticize the policies of the state of Israel. Many voices, not least from the side of anti-immigrationalists, and adversaries of islamization, are speaking for a boycott of this conference. This is a rather unique development. Tens, if not hundreds of such conferences have been held the later years, not least under the auspices of the European Union. Never before have these conferences drawn anywhere near as much criticism, although they all basically have the same aim: restricting freedom of speech in order to silence anti-immigration, traditionalist, Christian, and nationalist voices. In the context of the European Union such conferences have resulted, in amongst other things, the passing of new laws, most notably the: Council Framework Decision on combating certain forms and expressions of racism and xenophobia by means of criminal law (PDF), which if fully implemented, will be the end of free speech as we still know it in Denmark. Together with the similarly vicious European Arrest Warrant, we are one step closer to complete dictatorship and loss of traditional civil rights. Real legislation, no protests - advisory conference; hell breaks loose The conferences and decisions, which led to the approval of this new EU law, did not draw the same attention or protests as the current Durban II, although the former contrary to the latter resulted in real and dangerous legislation, while the Durban II conference results will only be of an advisory nature. The reason is obvious; the Durban II conference is thought to be detriment to Israeli interests. A large mobilization has taken place in order to convince governments not to take part in the Durban II conference. Anti-immigration voices, Islam skeptics and free speech defenders in the West have written letters to newspapers, and the media have been debating the issue in articles and on TV. Real legislation, no protests - advisory conference; hell breaks loose At the same time as this debate goes on, a Danish citizen has been extradited to Germany for alleged ‘hate speech’, even though it was not illegal in Denmark, and the allegation has not been proven. The media were silent, and did not engage in any discussion about the principles or the implications of this case, just as the ‘EU framework decision on fighting anti-Semitism and Xenophobia as well as the ‘European Arrest Warrant’ were passed without much interest. The threat to free speech from these laws are far greater than the Durban II conference, which only has advisory status, yet none of those who dedicated many articles to slamming Durban II, have even mentioned these laws, and their first practical results; the extradition of a Danish citizen to Germany. My letters to newspapers referring the case and the aforementioned laws were rejected. Only when, or perhaps only because Jewish - Israeli interests were at stake, did loud protests arise. Let there be no doubt; also I am opposed to participating in Durban II, as I am opposed to all of this and similar supra national legislation. The way in which we want to define human rights and free speech should of course be decided by the people of each nation themselves, and not by zealous special interest groups and globalist ‘NGO’s’ of which there are literary thousands. When I first read about the petition where one could protest the Durban II conference, I immediately gave my signature, but afterwards, when studying which organizations were supporting the protest, I was in for a big surprise. Durban II protesters are leading censorship promoter The list provided by the ’sign the Durban II petition’ free speech advocates, contained the names of 98 organizations, of which the great majority is actually dedicated to promoting censorship. Some of the world’s most renowned anti-white, pro-multicult, and anti-free speech organizations from many different countries are represented here. To name a few examples: The Anti Defamation League of B’nai B’rith (ADL), the Magenta Foundation, RADAR and CIDI (Holland), ENAR – European Network Against Racism, European Jewish Congress, the Simon Wiesenthal Centre, INACH - International Network Against Cyber Hate, DACoRD - Documentation and Advisory Center on Racial Discrimination (in Denmark known as DRC), are a few examples of the most widely known organizations which actively and zealously promote censorship and the persecution of opponents of the multicultural agenda. 45 of 98 are Jewish organizations Of the 98 listed organizations, at least 45 are Jewish and or Zionist. Among the rest there are a number which have Jewish personnel connected in various ways to the aforementioned Zionist and Jewish organizations, and of those which are not, most are also promoting censorship in the name of multiculturalism etc. As far as I remember there was exactly one organization I found which could appear as being a genuine promoter of free speech, and only a small handfull who did not show extremely anti-white indigenous bias. To document this, I have prepared a list consisting of the 98 organizations (form the Durban II protest movement), where I have added links and information as to what their priorities are. You can find it here: Durban II Conference Protests Led by Censorship Promoters Sleeping with the enemy The irony of this alliance between European free speech activists and the traditional censorship and multicult promoters is that thousands of people are willing to cooperate in a ‘protest against censorship’ side by side with forces with a completely opposite agenda. When it came to defending the rights of Europeans from serious legislative threats they were silent, when foreign police tore citizens away from their homes and loved ones, there was not a word. But now Zionist interests are at stake, everybody, from bloggers to the main stream media, is protesting loudly. If nothing else, this is just one more indication of the very real domination of our western societies by Zionist interests. Not only the neo-con leaning European anti-immigrationalists, but also the traditional oppressors of free speech; the ‘anti-racist watchdogs’, and multicult promoting institutions and media are showing their subservience to the Zionist agenda. Just as many of them strayed from their usual loud condemnations of military violence against civilians. Oh all powerful God of Zion! We will obey Your rule, please let us play our games in peace.. While opposition to Durban II of course is natural for anti-immigrationalists / nationalists and those who wish to stop the advancement of islamic forces in their home countries, it is harder to find good reasons to protest this conference for the traditional (non-Jewish) multicult organizations, unless they too are under some form of Zionist control. Or is it the same dillemma playing here which we see in the Jewish organizations; nationalism is bad and multi-culturalism is good, except when it concerns Israel? Ironically the so called ‘patriots’ find them selves in an alliance with the very forces which plan their own enslavement. Let this be said: The most effective and most damaging efforts to ban free speech still emanate from Jewish / Zionist quarters. While European activists support Zionist interests, the same Zionists are dilligently continuing to work to further erode free speech. Balder Comments:2
Posted by Anon on Tue, 03 Mar 2009 05:28 | # better to be surrounded by Moslems than by Euros. That’s their view. I’d say that is some kind of mental disorder. 3
Posted by Armor on Tue, 03 Mar 2009 06:26 | # “better to be surrounded by Moslems than by Euros. That’s their view.” Or better to be surrounded by Moslems engaged in endless conflict with Euros. I think Jewish organizations also tend to encourage animosity between Europe, Russia and the USA. 4
Posted by Primacy of Ethnicity on Tue, 03 Mar 2009 06:36 | # Mainstream writer/columnist Niall Ferguson freely admits the primacy and importance of ethnicity in history:
5
Posted by j on Tue, 03 Mar 2009 11:29 | # I understand your dilemma. Durban II promises to be a global ganging up on Israel and everything remotely connected with the West. In the absense of White Africans, who gave up and surrendered, Durban II will focus primarily on Israel, because it is the easiest target and all agree that it should be condemned (even you). Then, they will deal with secondary targets, like the unbearable whiteness of most European countries. Having taken Washington, now they will take Berlin. You, Sir, are confused: Should I oppose Durban II (and maybe assist Israel) or should I join this jamboree with the savages? Sorry, I cant help you. 6
Posted by Fred Scrooby on Tue, 03 Mar 2009 14:56 | # But J, why should Euronationalists help the Jews over Israel when the Jews within Europe and worldwide always take the side of the non-whites against the Euronationalists? In your comment you use sarcasm to say the rational choice for Euronationalists would be to align with the Jews over this conference issue because if Israel goes down, the next target will be the Eurosphere. But you completely ignore Balder’s main point: the Eurosphere is already targeted, is already going down, and prominent among the ones targeting it, prominent among the ones trying methodically to bring it down, are the Jews. Question for the readers: If two killers are after you, one wielding a knife and the other an axe, and they start fighting with each other, should you help the one with the knife or the one with the axe? Answer: ask J: if he’s not in an evasive mood he may tell you. Then again, he may be in an evasive mood. The Jews get into a sort of “deny everything, deny the most obvious reality, deny two-plus-two if you have to” mode when they don’t want to be cornered in an argument. It’s the “Jewish just-deny-reality-and-everything-in-it” mode of argumentation. I saw J and another Jew doing this at J’s blog the first day J came here: I clicked on his link, followed him back to his blog and read an entry and comments thread there about how he’d concluded Professor MacDonald was “a Nazi who would like to exterminate Jews,” or words to that effect, totally disregarding the relevant issues. The relevant issues were disposed of with this line posted by the other Jew: —uhhhh …. wait, I’ll get to that other Jew’s line in a second. First, let’s imagine someone exculpates the communists as being mainly responsible for the Russian Revolution, on grounds they had already tried and failed in 1905 so something else must have been responsible for their success in 1917, something that had changed in the interval and allowed them to succeed this time, and therefore they, the communists, weren’t the main factor behind the 1917 revolution, but this other thing was, this thing that had changed in the interval. So, the communists are excuplated for what happened to Russia in 1917. Or say you heard someone arguing that the installation of National Socialism in Germany in 1933 wasn’t due to Hitler and the Nazis but to some other factor, because Hitler and the Nazis had already tried to take over in 1924 with the Kapp Putsch and failed, so the fact that they succeeded in 1933 must mean some other factor, some factor that had changed in the interval from 1924 to 1933 and allowed them to succeed this time, was responsible, and so the installation of the National Socialists in 1933 could NOT have been due to the efforts of Hitler and his fellow party members. If you heard someone arguing like that you’d think you were in an Abbott and Costello routine or something out of a Three Stooges movie, right? You’d say to yourself, “it’s time to get out of here because I’m wasting my time with this guy,” right? OK, so here’s the line the other Jew at J’s site came up with to demolish all of Prof. MacDonald’s scholarship: he said, “The Jews couldn’t have been the most prominent factor behind the success of the 1965 immigration bill because they had tried in 1924 and failed, so something else must have changed in the interval that allowed them to succeed, and that other thing is why we have the 1965 law now.” I had wandered over to J’s site to have a look and maybe participate in the comments threads but I took one look at that guy’s argument and at J standing there nodding his head in agreement at how that one-liner had, indeed, blown Kevin MacDonald’s book out of the water, and I said to myself, “Looks like these Jews are in the Jewish just-deny-reality mode — no one’s gonna get anywhere with these guys; I’m outta here.” Final point: aren’t “Israel” and “Jewry” distinct? If diaspora Jewry is tormenting and attacking Euros everywhere in the Eurosphere and trying to bring Euros and Eurosphere nations down, it doesn’t mean anyone should get mad at Israel, an entity distinct from Jewry, right? Euros angry at Jewry can still help defend Israel without being fools for defending the one trying to harm them, right? Wrong. I myself have only recently come to see the fundamental way in which Israel and Euro-hating Diaspora Jewry are one and the same. Euros who withhold support for Israel pending diaspora Jewry’s agreement on a halt to and reversal of Eurosphere race-replacement are justified. Ilana Mercer’s recent appeal for Euronationalist support for Israel (or paleocon support I think was how she phrased it) failed to take Jewry’s genocidal treachery against Euros and the underlying oneness of Jewry and Israel into account. 7
Posted by Captainchaos on Tue, 03 Mar 2009 17:30 | # j: “Durban II promises to be a global ganging up on Israel and everything remotely connected with the West.” Mexico is, in a sense, as connected to the West as Israel. Both are the homes of racial aliens who have adopted some of the trappings of White culture, economics and technology. I don’t feel particularly connected to either one, and the connections that exist, I would shed. “In the absense of White Africans, who gave up and surrendered, Durban II will focus primarily on Israel, because it is the easiest target and all agree that it should be condemned (even you).” South Africa and Rhodesia were stabbed in the back by Western powers, crippled by sanctions, mercilessly subjected to anti-White propaganda. Israel enjoys the benefit of being the puppet master of America and its 170 million Whites. “Then, they will deal with secondary targets, like the unbearable whiteness of most European countries.” They are gathering in a European country to try to get White race traitors to accept their demands to better facilitate the process of race-replacement in WHITE COUNTRIES. Secondary target? Where do you get your nonsense? “Having taken Washington,” LOL! AIPAC was there first. “...now they will take Berlin.” Uh oh, that could be bad. Now the hapless Germans will have to start paying Crusades reparations and building all of the Arabs’ infrastructure for them too. “You, Sir, are confused:” Maybe it’s that good ole ethnocentrism that fogs up the lens. You know what I’m talking about? Of course you do. “Should I oppose Durban II (and maybe assist Israel) or should I join this jamboree with the savages?” I think I see the beginnings of an ungentlemanly agreement forming: “You do what you want with your Kaffirs and I’ll do what I want with mine.” Is that it, j? We’ll both of us be “Nazis” except this time to our mutual benefit, eh? “Sorry, I cant help you.” You Jews could always just piss off and leave us Whites alone, but that will never happen, I know. “I understand your dilemma.” Every time you look in the mirror. 8
Posted by j on Wed, 04 Mar 2009 23:24 | # Just to clear up one point. Prof. MacDonald is correct in saying that Jewish organizations were actively trying to weaken immigration laws in the twenties and thirties of the last century, because those laws had been instituted with the purpose of closing America to Jewish immigration. Jewish situation in Europe at those times was desperate and there was nowhere to go. Immigration became a question of life or death for European Jews after 1933, when Hitler took power in Germany. Jewish efforts failed notoriously and the Jews were left in the lands occupied by their worst enemies. In summary, Jewish preoccupation and focus on immigration was limited to saving Jews alone and it was a vital issue for Jew. No one had in mind Mexicans, Guatemalans, etc. that were very small peoples in those times. Prof. MacDonald charges Jewish lobbying with the flooding of America with third world peoples and he insinuates a motive for it, which is to weaken or destroy White America. That is no true, it is absurd, and I am amazed that a psychologist who invented the very concept of Jewish super-ethnicism or hyper-egoism or whatever, could accuse Jews of ... what? fighting to bring in millions of third world people to America? To Europe? To Australia? To Sweden? When American Jews were fighting immigration laws no one imagined that third world peoples were to multiply so fast and try to flee their countries. Guatemala was a half million people country in the twenties, now it has about 20 million inhabitants. Does Prof. MacDonald believe that Jews did foresee the dramatic change in the Earth demography, and they planned ahead for the famelic hordes to be born in two generations ahead? BTW, the only people I heard of supplying sanctuaries to illegal immigrants and fighting for them are ... Christian Churches. The only thing I heard of Jews and illegals was that Jewish companies were employing and exploiting them, and that they ended in jail en masse as they should. 9
Posted by danielj on Thu, 05 Mar 2009 00:07 | # If two killers are after you, one wielding a knife and the other an axe, and they start fighting with each other, should you help the one with the knife or the one with the axe? Classic! I’d help the guy with the knife cause he’d be easier to take down after we took down the axe wielder. 10
Posted by Anglo-Saxon Observer on Thu, 05 Mar 2009 00:18 | # Does Prof. MacDonald believe that Jews did foresee the dramatic change in the Earth demography, and they planned ahead for the famelic hordes to be born in two generations ahead? J raises an interesting question. I’ve read McDonald and although I accept Jews will always first look out for their own, I have difficulty seeing Jews as having some sort of hive-mind. What say you Fred? 11
Posted by Captainchaos on Thu, 05 Mar 2009 00:40 | # j: “Just to clear up one point. Prof. MacDonald is correct…” Yes, he is. “...Jewish organizations were actively trying to weaken immigration laws…” (cough, cough) What about the Immigration and Nationality Act of 1965? Otherwise know as the Hart-Celler Act? HART…CELLER?! “...in the twenties and thirties of the last century,” See above, genius. “...because those laws had been instituted with the purpose of closing America to Jewish immigration.” Now why would Americans not want their country to be flooded by Jews? See above…genius. “Jewish situation in Europe at those times was desperate and there was nowhere to go.” The German situation is Europe was desperate post-war, and there was no where to go. To the tune of TEN MILLION DEAD GERMANS POST-WAR! “Jewish efforts failed notoriously and the Jews were left in the lands occupied by their worst enemies.” German efforts to defeat Judeo-Bolshevism failed and Germans were left in the lands occupied by their worst enemies. “In summary, Jewish preoccupation and focus on immigration was limited to saving Jews alone and it was a vital issue for Jew.” BULLSHIT! Earl Raab, of the Perlmutter Institute of Jewish Advocacy, wrote in the San Francisco Jewish Bulletin: “It was only after World War II that immigration law was drastically changed to eliminate such discrimination. In one of the first pieces of evidence of its political coming-of-age, the Jewish community has a leadership role in effecting those changes.” And: “We have been nourishing the American climate of opposition to ethnic bigotry for about half a century. That climate has not yet been perfected, but the heterogeneous nature of our population tends to make it irreversible and makes our constitutional constraints against bigotry more practical than ever.” “Does Prof. MacDonald believe that Jews did foresee the dramatic change in the Earth demography, and they planned ahead for the famelic hordes to be born in two generations ahead?” LOL! Were Jews so stupid as to not grasp the EXPLOSIVE GROWTH in population even AT THAT TIME and not to be aware that there were already MORE THAN ENOUGH non-Whites to SWAMP WHITES UP TO THEIR EYE-BALLS?! I gotta admire your chutzpah, j, you’re a chip off the old block. “BTW, the only people I heard of supplying sanctuaries to illegal immigrants and fighting for them are ... Christian Churches.” ADL, SPLC…RING A BELL? All except the sanctuary though, we would never expect anything like that out of Jews; get the goyim to foot the bill. “The only thing I heard of Jews and illegals was that Jewish companies were employing and exploiting them, and that they ended in jail en masse as they should.” You need to get out more. P.S. When are Jews going to start paying reparations to Ukrainians for the Holodomor? P.P.S. When are Jews going to stop sexually enslaving White Slavic girls? Take your time. 12
Posted by Captainchaos on Thu, 05 Mar 2009 01:03 | # To sum up, j. Jews are superior to Whites not in the least: not physically, intellectually, spiritually or morally. You therefore cannot be our teachers and guides; and, if right is right, we will NEVER serve. You bring us so much more misery than you have EVER brought us good. We want separation! 13
Posted by Fred Scrooby on Thu, 05 Mar 2009 01:06 | #
The Jews have been fighting restrictions on immigration since 1880. What was the imminent peril faced by the Jews in 1965, the year they pried this country’s borders open, dealing it its death blow?
That was the 1920s and 1930s you’re talking about. How small were they in 1965 when the Jews pried open this country’s borders? How small are they now, in 2009? Right now, in 2009, the Jews are the biggest obstacle to rectifying the open borders mistake. Why? We’re in 2009 now, J, not the 1930s. What’s up with fanatical Jewish insistence on open borders to the Third World today?
He gives quotes, J. The Jews themselves brag that they were leaders in bringing about the submergence of Euros here in an ocean of non-whiteness, adding that that makes them feel more secure. What was that Jew’s name again, Rahn, whom he quotes? I can’t recall. The guy comes out and states the above in black and white as if he hasn’t a clue, NOT A CLUE, how that instills seething anger against the Jews in Euros who become aware of statements like that. Far from making Jews more secure, it imperils them more.
OK so now that everyone sees it was a huge mistake, now in the year 2009, Jewish groups like the ADL, the SPLC, the ACLU, the CJC, LICRA, CRIF, and literally every Jewish organization in existence in the Eurosphere will now drop its fanatical opposition to closing the borders? Wake up, J.
Anyone who proposes closing the borders again and re-instituting a sane immigration policy quickly learns which groups howl the loudest: the Jews. 14
Posted by danielj on Thu, 05 Mar 2009 01:09 | #
The Arab has the knife, by the way. Just so we’re clear, the Jew has the axe. 15
Posted by Fred Scrooby on Thu, 05 Mar 2009 01:17 | # Excuse me, I posted without seeing Captainchaos’s post above: he names the Jew I was thinking of: Earl Raab of the Perlmutter Institute. Any Jews reading this need to understand that Euros don’t want their country’s racial balance tampered with for any reason whatsoever, and statements such as those by Raab make Euros who had nothing whatsoever against Jews seethe with anger and start to loathe them. Sorry, that doesn’t add up to “making them more safe.” It adds up to the start of troubles for them that they don’t even want to think about and can’t even imagine. NO JEWS SHOULD FOLLOW, SUPPORT, OR CONTRIBUTE MONEY TO ANY JEW OR JEWISH ORGANIZATION THAT PUSHES RACE-CHANGE ON ANY WHITE COUNTRY. Why not? For one thing, it’s wrong. It’s genocide. For another, it gets people extremely, extremely, extremely mad at Jews, including people who had nothing against Jews before. I could go on with other reasons but those two right there should be sufficient. 16
Posted by Desmond Jones on Thu, 05 Mar 2009 01:26 | # From d/w (the dreaded wiki)-
Hitler was in Landsberg jail in 1924. The Congressional Record reports Representative William N. Vaile of Colorado, one of the most prominent restrictionists:
17
Posted by Captainchaos on Thu, 05 Mar 2009 01:43 | # Here is a video dedicated to j: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kCdEkCckH_g Who’s your daddy? 18
Posted by Captainchaos on Thu, 05 Mar 2009 02:17 | # Uh oh, j, we’ve got a problem here. Nathan Burstein of the Jerusalem post writes: http://www.jpost.com/servlet/Satellite?cid=1191257286817&pagename=JPost/JPArticle/ShowFull “It’s a list of “the world’s most powerful people,” 100 of the bankers and media moguls, publishers and image makers who shape the lives of billions. It’s an exclusive, insular club, one whose influence stretches around the globe but is concentrated strategically in the highest corridors of power. More than half its members, at least by one count, are Jewish.” Really, no shit? Tell me more… “It’s a list, in other words, that would have made earlier generations of Jews jump out of their skins, calling attention, as it does, to their disproportionate influence in finance and the media.” Not to worry, the goyim are good and brainwashed now. “Joseph Aaron, the editor of The Chicago Jewish News, thinks it’s a list his readers should “feel very, very good about.”“ It is a list that every good goy should feel ecstatic about! “The approach hasn’t attracted much attention this year, but set off a Hollywood firestorm in 1994 when a reporter for England’s Spectator used that year’s New Establishment as inspiration for his own article, in which critics accused him of perpetrating harmful stereotypes about Jewish control of the movie industry. (The writer, William Cash, argued that the piece was partly meant to call attention to the contrast between the traditional, white Protestant “establishment,” and the disproportionally Jewish new version.)” And the Jews subsequently suffocated the nascent career of said William Cash for saying what they themselves say and know to be true. Bad goy, bad! “The magazine’s limited definition of power, then, constitutes areas in which Jews have long excelled, often by necessity, says Ruth Wisse, a professor of Yiddish and comparative literature at Harvard University.” Nothing like having your arm twisted to charge the goyim 50% interest (ahem, usury). What a bunch of died-in-the-wool altruists our friends the Jews are. “For Aaron, the list shows how “vital” Jews have become in American life. The Vanity Fair rankings, he writes, “[tell] you so much about the place of Jews in this country, about the amazing people Jews are.”“ LOL! 19
Posted by Captainchaos on Thu, 05 Mar 2009 03:11 | # Here are some more touching sentiments from our good, good friends, the Jews, j. Jewish professor of history at Brown University wrote in Ha’aretz: http://www.haaretz.com/hasen/spages/912058.html “The current political situation in Ukraine does not offer much hope. President Viktor Yushchenko is trying to have the great famine recognized as genocide. Doing so will not only suggest an equivalence between Stalin’s induced catastrophe, which cost the lives of up to six million mostly, but not exclusively, Ukrainian citizens, and the Holocaust.” Shame of those filthy goyim, the Ukrainians. “And just as the last remnants of Jewish life and culture disappear, anti-Semitic discourse is back, and the Jews are blamed for all the suffering Ukrainians have endured, from the great famine of the 1930s and the Soviet murder of nationalist heroes all the way to the corruption of post-Communist regimes.” Ever heard of Lazar Kaganovitch, j? Read up. A little on the Holodomor: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Holodomor#Scope_and_duration “During the Holodomor, cannibalism was widespread, as evident from the documents of the time.[26] The Soviet regime even printed posters declaring: “To eat your own children is a barbarian act.”“ You get that j? Parents of young children were often driven so mad by hunger they KILLED AND ATE THEIR OWN CHILDREN thanks to Lazar Kaganovitch and his NKVD Jewish thugs. Zyklon-B or being driven past the point of human endurance so you KILL AND EAT YOUR OWN CHILDREN?! Did I stu…stu…stutter, fuckhead? I never want to here about the fucking Holocaust again! 20
Posted by Lurker on Thu, 05 Mar 2009 05:08 | # If two killers are after you, one wielding a knife and the other an axe, and they start fighting with each other, should you help the one with the knife or the one with the axe? I would take the opportunity to run to a safe distance and watch, there is at least a chance both will be fatally injured. Then, with luck I won’t have to anything at all. 21
Posted by anonymous on Thu, 05 Mar 2009 05:15 | # The muzzies will have a knife, the Jews an ax and we’ll be left with nothing: 22
Posted by silver (himself) on Thu, 05 Mar 2009 08:10 | #
But you also fight against what you don’t want. And that’s more powerful—people always do more to avoid or lessen pain than to gain pleasure. In their minds (and not only their minds), “White Supremacy” spells doom; the alternatives are less than ideal but livable. 23
Posted by ATBOTL on Fri, 06 Mar 2009 05:01 | # J’s post is ridiculous and full of lies. Jewish advocacy for open borders immigration in the USA long predates WWII or the nazis. Jews were heavily involved in the passing of the 1965 immigration act, a piece of legislation with the clear an inescapable effect of changing America into a nonwhite country. Post a comment:
Next entry: A religious image
|
|
Existential IssuesDNA NationsCategoriesContributorsEach author's name links to a list of all articles posted by the writer. LinksEndorsement not implied. Immigration
Islamist Threat
Anti-white Media Networks Audio/Video
Crime
Economics
Education General
Historical Re-Evaluation Controlled Opposition
Nationalist Political Parties
Science Europeans in Africa
Of Note MR Central & News— CENTRAL— An Ancient Race In The Myths Of Time by James Bowery on Wednesday, 21 August 2024 15:26. (View) Slaying The Dragon by James Bowery on Monday, 05 August 2024 15:32. (View) The legacy of Southport by Guessedworker on Friday, 02 August 2024 07:34. (View) Ukraine, Israel, Taiwan … defend or desert by Guessedworker on Sunday, 14 April 2024 10:34. (View) — NEWS — Farage only goes down on one knee. by Guessedworker on Saturday, 29 June 2024 06:55. (View) |
Posted by Fred Scrooby on Tue, 03 Mar 2009 04:21 | #
You have to accept what you see, assuming you didn’t swallow LSD twenty minutes ago. What do we see? We see that the Jews want an Islamic Europe. How do we see this? We see it by what they fight tooth-and-nail to bring about and to keep anyone from opposing. What you fight for is what you want — this isn’t rocket science.
Question: But … don’t they consider Islam their enemy?
Answer: “The enemy of my enemy is my friend.” They see us — Euros — as their enemy. In their eyes Islam is less an enemy than we are, so if they can use Islam to destroy Euros they’ll feel they’ve come out ahead even if that leaves them surrounded by a sea of Moslems: better to be surrounded by Moslems than by Euros. That’s their view.
Balder goes on to say that while European activists support Jewish interests Jews work hard to undermine European interests. Jews certainly work very hard against European interests (it’s a labor of love), and the reason is very simple: they don’t like Europeans.
This stuff is very uncomplicated: there’s a tribal war going on, Jews against Euros. (The “Post-modern liberalism” stuff is a miasma theory. The real deal is this is a tribal war just like twenty thousand years ago.) To every Euro reading this: Jews don’t like your tribe. Their dislike ranges from slight to genocidal depending on the individual Jew.