The White Genocide Evidence Project

Posted by Christian M on Friday, 25 February 2011 02:04.

The White Genocide Evidence Project
Copyright 2011, Christian Miller

“Discourse is war.”  ~Søren Renner

This is the White Genocide Evidence Project: contributors will help create a database of evidence documenting the intentional destruction, displacement, and denigration of the White race in all White nations—White genocide.  These contributions will be quotations or other evidence, buttressed as much as possible by references, which will eventually be converted into a final product to expose the perpetrators of White genocide.  Hundreds of online discussion forums and websites have already compiled immense lists of hateful, slanderous, or genocidal quotations against the White race.  The idea is to collect and synthesize these quotations (and any other evidence) into a polished, presentable, unimpeachable, and independent end-product suitable for public dissemination to the population at large. 

Many realize the “open borders” movement is a thinly-veiled attempt to dilute and thereby destroy all White nations—Africa for the Africans, Asia for the Asians, White countries for everybody.  White people are libeled and demonized by cultural Marxists in academia, vilified by public slander, and robbed of the right to self-identify all in order to instill a destructive sense of false White guilt.  Anti-Whites advance these agendas and claim “the race problem” will disappear if all the White nations assimilate and interbreed with an overwhelming flood of non-White immigrants.  These malevolent social engineers yearn for a blended humanity in White nations—mocha-skinned people and societies without race by homogenous default.  What they never mention—and what is left to nationalists to publicly emphasize—is that this plan for “diversity” only applies to White nations.  If this patent truth were well-recognized, everyone would recognize this scheme as the systematic eradication of the White race—White genocide.

Ideally, the people promoting, financing, conspiring in, and implementing White genocide will be brought to justice before an international genocide tribunal.  Additionally, the people and organizations pushing for White genocide can face criminal prosecution or civil litigation in various nations.  Countless lawsuits have been filed seeking monetary damages or criminal charges against people, firms, or organizations linked to alleged atrocities of the Second World War or modern ethnic conflicts.  In the same manner, the forces responsible for White genocide will attract a cottage industry of lucrative lawsuits seeking monetary redress.  Myriad wealthy individuals, endowed foundations, and multinational corporations share complicity in the drive to destroy the White race.  These deep pockets are ideal targets for lawsuits.  This project can provide the groundwork for a prima facie complaint in international or domestic courts of law.

As stated, the ultimate purpose of this project is to reproduce all of the quotations and evidence into an independent website unaffiliated with any group or faction.  It will serve as an objective testament to the persecution and genocide of White people worldwide.  This website will be an invaluable resource to awaken others to the existential issues facing the White race.  Furthermore, this project will deter many anti-White individuals from engaging in further hostilities against the White race because it will publicize these crimes to the world and increase the likelihood of criminal prosecution and civil litigation.

Please submit direct quotations, written or spoken, that implicate one or more persons, organizations, or governments under the United Nations definition of genocide (see below).  Remember the burden of proof is upon the prosecutor or plaintiff; specific details are invaluable.  Context, publication details, and verifiable references are all extremely important.  If a particular quotation lacks any of these attributes, provide it anyway because others can contribute by filling in the gaps.  This is the nature of the project—a worldwide collaboration to create a voluminous, detailed, and well-referenced database of quotations and evidence to implicate agents and organizations responsible for White genocide.  Quotations are the easiest to find and thus the primary focus.  However, talented and resourceful researchers can submit voting records, corporate policies, lobbying agendas, political agreements, or immigration policies, which are all very helpful.  Creativity is encouraged.

Format for submissions:

Name
Nation
Background: occupation, organizational link(s), position(s) of authority
Genocide violation: part A, B, C, D, and/or E
Quotation
Context of quotation
References: any URL, print, radio, television, or other reference(s) for the quotation

***EXAMPLE***

Noel Ignatiev
Professor of American history at the Massachusetts College of Art
Co-founder and co-editor of Race Traitor Magazine
Marxist activist and critical race theorist
United States of America
A B C D
“The goal of abolishing the White race is on its face so desirable that some may find it hard to believe that it could incur any opposition other than from committed White supremacists…Keep bashing the dead White males, and the live ones, and the females, too, until the social construct known as the White race is destroyed. Not deconstructed, but destroyed.”
Calling for the destruction of the White race
http://harvardmagazine.com/2002/09/abolish-the-white-race.html
http://www.vdare.com/roberts/harvard_genocide.htm
http://racetraitor.org/

Keep in mind that under international law, genocide is not confined to murder or physical violence and White genocide is not always explicit or related to immigration policy.  Evidence of moral degradation, ethnic cleansing from neighborhoods, policies to suppress White birthrates, interracial violence, vilification of the White race, and other such attacks contributing to White genocide is encouraged as well.  For more information on the concept of White genocide, please read None Dare Call It White Genocide, excerpted below:

The overarching goal of the “open borders” movement is to flood millions of non-Whites into all traditionally White nations.  Make no mistake - this is not mere coincidence.  It is White genocide by design, worldwide in application.  The United States, Great Britain, France, Germany, Belgium, the Netherlands, and Australia: White people founded and populated these nations.  All of these nations operated under the implicit mandate, if not explicit by law, that they existed as White nations for the posterity of the White founding stock.  All of these nations had overwhelmingly White populations for the preponderance of their national history.  Now, in the beginning of the twenty-first century, all of these traditionally White nations face demographic upheavals through massive non-White immigration.  The White populations of these countries are slated to become minority populations in just a few generations.

International law defines genocide as an international crime against humanity, with grave punishment for violations. As far as the international recognition of the reality of race, ask the ghosts of Saddam Hussein or Wilhelm Frick if the Kurds or Jews, respectively, are mere social constructs. Race is an internationally-recognized reality and is a major factor in the crime of genocide. In the future, the political and economic elites that are responsible for the policies of White genocide may face trial before an international tribunal. The 1948 United Nations Convention on the Prevention and Punishment of the Crime of Genocide, Article II states:

In the present Convention, genocide means any of the following acts committed with the intent to destroy, in whole or in part, a national, ethnic, racial, or religious group as such:

    (a) Killing members of the group;
    (b) Causing serious bodily or mental harm to members of the group;
    (c) Deliberately inflicting on the group conditions of life calculated to bring about its physical destruction in whole or in part;
    (d) Imposing measures intended to prevent births within the group;
    (e) Forcibly transferring children of the group to another group

Raphael Lemkin, who originated the term genocide, defined it as follows:

Generally speaking, genocide does not necessarily mean destruction of a nation… It is intended rather to signify a coordinated plan of different actions aiming at the destruction of essential foundations of the life of national groups, with the aim of annihilating the groups themselves. The objectives of such a plan would be the disintegration of the political and social institutions, of culture, language, national feelings, religion, and the economic existence of national groups, and the destruction of the personal security, liberty, health, dignity, and even the lives of the individuals belonging to such groups. Genocide is directed against the national group as an entity, and the actions involved are directed against individuals, not in their individual capacity but as members of a national group.



Comments:


1

Posted by Frank on Fri, 04 Mar 2011 16:29 | #

A role friends serve is to offer good advice. I really didn’t mean to criticise you though mate.

Ah, that’s not to say an anonymous person like me you’ve met off and on at different sites over the years is a “friend” (beware Internet strangers!)


2

Posted by anon on Fri, 04 Mar 2011 23:36 | #

I say this not because I am impractical, but because we were probably fated to perish after Stalingrad. For 70 years we’ve been on borrowed time. I suspect we have a few more decades until the end, which means I shall have lived my whole life in the shadow of decline, as a member of a dying people.

I suppose at this point all that matters is to chronicle how we could have endured, and why.


Coldly beautiful words. Am surprised by your pessimism.


3

Posted by Guest Lurker on Sat, 05 Mar 2011 00:13 | #

Leon wrote:

Finally, what’s with the crack about “the deep sewer of my mind”? Are you Asian, married to one, related to one? You’re way too defensive about this.

    Christ you can write some long-winded posts. I’m not in any way connected to any Asians, but you’re the first white man I’ve ever heard intimate that somehow white women with east Asians is even a greater humiliation than white women with primitive simian-like sub-saharan throwbacks. If there are going to be dysgenic white women out there mating with non-whites,  I would personally prefer they were LESS dysgenic than they currently are, just as I would prefer our race in general to be less damaged than it currently is.  That is, I could live with maybe losing the occasional white female in our populous to a half-way respectable Asian, rather than the current situation where a significant percentage of the white female population are black fetishists, something that exists in no other race’s female population, outside of black female of course.
    You keep repeating I’m not understanding the gist of what you’re trying to convey, but I’m not sure you get me either. We’re talking past each other, because our visceral reactions to race mixing simply differ. You can obviously rational black/white couples, where I find asian/white ones LESS noxious, without reading any extra loss of personal racial or sexual status into it.  Simply put, I find your reasoning very convoluted and more than a bit disturbing. We disagree, so let’s leave it at that.

P.S. I live in Southern Cal as well, and see no evidence of this wave of white females with asian males “en masse”- certainly nowhere near the white male/asian female levels, or the black male/white female abominations.

Happy Landings


4

Posted by Frank on Sat, 05 Mar 2011 01:48 | #

Christian,

relocate it all to a separate thread? Or just delete - I for one wouldn’t mind.


5

Posted by PF on Sat, 05 Mar 2011 04:11 | #

So Leon… are you looking for advice on Game?

Lets put the racial stuff on the backburner for a second and acknowledge the massive importance of tail!

... or not… *smiles*

seriously though, if uh is reading this: I am still interested in purchasing your teeth.

If anyone wants to know about Game I’d recommend doing an internet archive search for
http://www.seducingwomen101.com and reading everything Destini9 ever wrote. She was a 40
year old sexual adventuress and stripper, of the pure American stripe, who developed really esoteric theories about attraction based on Jungian archetypes and self-awareness stuff. You can read many pages
of her long-winded essays, but everything she says is actually legit. She is a counterpoint to
both mainstream dating advice and ‘seduction community’ stuff.

Basically she was the MR of seduction psyche. Thats just my opinion, but I’m writing this as a tribute to her since she since disappeared into obscurity and cant be found… She is in my pantheon of heroes along with Wintermute, GW, uh, Nietzsche, and a few other greats.

Requisquiat in Paces, Destini9.


6

Posted by Leon Haller on Sat, 05 Mar 2011 06:41 | #

CHRISTIAN,

Sorry for throwing a curveball by mentioning the white female/Asian male thing a long time ago on this thread, though I’m sure it was in response to another comment, etc. These discussion threads always go all over the place.

Also, I did suggest that this project was potentially valuable enough to merit its own special file under OF NOTE, which it now seems to have.

On the other hand, looking back over what I’ve said (which keeps getting misinterpreted and personalized for some reason), there is actually some valuable insights strewn amongst the irrelevant stuff. And I did question early on whether our race actually is being ‘genocided’. What is happening is that the conditions for our perpetuity are being gradually weakened or removed - like necessary ecological habitat supporting wildlife, which is not the same thing as hunters running amok.

This last point of mine is rather important, and you need to formulate a convincing response, if this project is to have the value I suspect you impute to it.


7

Posted by Leon Haller on Sat, 05 Mar 2011 06:43 | #

PF,

So Leon… are you looking for advice on Game?

Uh, no, but thanks. Maybe I’ll take a look at what you recommend. I need no advice (as you will see if you read what I wrote above). I do worry about the long term effect of many good white women now taking up with Asians (saw two more tonight in Westwood), as degenerate white females have done with blacks and Mexicans.

I would like to know about Wintermute, however. I’ve heard the reference, but never seen anything by him/her.


8

Posted by Leon Haller on Sat, 05 Mar 2011 06:44 | #

GUEST LURKER,

“lengthy” would be more accurate than “long-winded”. Look it up.

The issue is QUALITY loss. How many quality white females around here run around with blacks? Seriously, dude! It’s mostly the very slutty, low-IQ type (in the old days it was really ugly ones, too - now, I admit to being very annoyed when I see an attractive white girl with a Negroid, even if she usually is stupid and low class).

But many women I see with Asian males are normal, middle or better class, etc. That represents a real loss to the race.

In fairness, business takes me up to San Francisco with some frequency, and the Asian/white problem seems to be even worse there. I’ve also seen it in San Diego.


9

Posted by Leon Haller on Sat, 05 Mar 2011 06:46 | #

FRANK,

No hard feelings. I just don’t want to be misinterpreted, or miscast as something I’m not. For example, on the many ‘conservative’ threads from which I’ve been banned (eg, Chronicles, First Things, Free Republic, etc), I’m often castigated as “that Nazi”, when I repeatedly stress that I am not a philosophical Nazi, but a true conservative who therefore wishes to keep the white race from extinction. What is more ‘conservative’ than that? Unfortunately, for the race liberals at places like those mentioned, I ask the tough questions about the compatibility between race-denial / race-replacement and conservatism, to which the cowards don’t have answers, and so respond like petulant children. Fleming is just the worst, a true coward (actually Scott Richert might be the very worst; I barely consider him to be on the Right at all).

If you’re not banned yet from those sites, keep hoisting the race patriot flag.


10

Posted by Leon Haller on Sat, 05 Mar 2011 09:27 | #

I say this not because I am impractical, but because we were probably fated to perish after Stalingrad. For 70 years we’ve been on borrowed time. I suspect we have a few more decades until the end, which means I shall have lived my whole life in the shadow of decline, as a member of a dying people.

I suppose at this point all that matters is to chronicle how we could have endured, and why. (LH)

Coldly beautiful words. Am surprised by your pessimism.(anon)

ANON,

Do you comment here or elsewhere under another moniker? You seem vaguely familiar.

Anyway, I alternate between moments of optimism and pessimism. It would be strange to sound defeatist, especially for me, as I am tidying up my affairs and finances in order to be able to devote myself in the second part of my career/life to full-time racialism - scholarship, media work, and political organizing in the US on behalf of our soon to be white minority.

I am doing this without any convincing expectation of final victory - though there are several levels constituting such victory, from reconquest of former white polities, to the foreign racial state I advocate, to white group consciousness raising and protectionist activism within ‘diversified’ societies to ensure white survival even if we are numeric minorities. I will do it for what are ultimately Christian reasons, but mixed with ‘earthy’ passions and psychic impulses. That is, I think that 1) Western civilization has both a right and even a duty to survive, and that it cannot do so without whites; 2) someone who understands the truth and could make a real contribution to the cause ought to do so, both out of Christian ethical obligation, as well as personal honor; and 3) I could write some books that would be a source of pride; possibly make it in rightist media, which I would prefer to my current business career; and really enjoy building the white activist organization I have had in mind for over 15 years.

But in the end, will it matter? Only intermediately, I think.

The back and forth between me and Guest Lurker in this thread is extremely important, because it implicates the major issue in racial survival: how can or will we stop our women from miscegenating? In every generation there is a large number of women who do not reproduce (I’ve done no specific research, but I’d like to know the number for women under 50, which I suspect is substantially higher than for women over 70, 80, 90). I think that number has been rising throughout the 20th century, and into this one.

Every gene line whose carrier miscegenates is lost to the white race. For example, unless Tiger Woods’ Swedish supermodel wife divorces him, remarries a white man, and has children with the latter, she will not have passed her racial essence to a new generation. I do not regard miscegenation as a ‘spreading’ of the white racial genotype to other races, but simply as a subtraction from the white race, at least if the miscegenator is female (why this should be so is obvious, but the answer could be given this way: is Obama white or black?).

I think racial extinction is likely because miscegenation will only become more common in the future, at least to the extent that people are allowed sexual and marital freedom. It would have increased even apart from immigration, simply due to expanding wealth and ever easier travel. The internet exponentially increases miscegenation opportunities, and this will only grow in the future (until the pool of possible miscegenators has been soaked up, and only willful non-miscegenators remain - and they will be too few to defend themselves).

What can counter the racial-loss effects of miscegenation? Ultimately, either sexual authoritarianism, long present in the West, esp pre-WW2, but now and for the foreseeable future totally morally and politically discredited, or else something (attitudes, laws, economic changes) to cause huge fertility increases among the non-miscegenating portion of the white population (to counteract or overwhelm the miscegenators, as it were). The former will not happen in the modern West as presently politically constituted (so we’re back to advocating RaHoWa, and the instantiation of a semi-totalitarian Racial State), and all exogenous trends in society, economics, government parasitism, social dysgenesis, parenting psychologies, even environmental and natural resource conditions, militate against large white families (and the trend almost everywhere is for smaller nonwhite families, too). [Note: the one exception is certain white fundamentalist Christian groups with a hyper-family and reproduction orientation - yet another reason why we need to enlist Christianity on our side, or make it ideologically congruent with racial preservationism, as well as why atheistic forms of nationalism will always prove so, well, sterile.] 

The problem with Racial Revolution is that white societies are too wealthy and secure for their peoples to risk death and economic ruin in fomenting it - especially for something as abstract and personally remote as “saving the white race”. Whites will have to become far more miserable than at present before they will pick up guns en masse for revolutionary reasons. Before that level of misery is reached, however, the white peoples will elect conservative parties, who in turn will ameliorate the problems with better government solutions, especially in the economic sphere - and thus furtheranesthetize their populations in the face of accelerating racial dispossession and “pre-extinction”. By the time whites are so immiserated that they “don’t give a fuck”, as the skins say, they will be too few to wage a credible counter-revolution (see, eg, their condition in Rhodesia/Zimbabwe today - and their lack of white revolutionary activity).

Whites are going to have to learn to survive as a diasporic people (imagine that: a native born white Englishman a refugee in bloody England itself!!). Will they be able to do so? Will they be allowed to?


11

Posted by Sam Davidson on Sat, 05 Mar 2011 14:22 | #

If the admins on this site are serious why are they allowing someone posting under the name “Leon Haller” to HIJACK A THREAD ABOUT WHITE GENOCIDE so he can talk about comparative penis size or how his relationships have failed?


12

Posted by Frank on Sat, 05 Mar 2011 16:00 | #

Christian M,

Ignatiev, “The Point is Not to Interpret Whiteness but to Abolish It,” found at
http://www.postfun.com/racetraitor/features/thepoint.html
Thompson, Essay Review.

Source.

—-

Leon,

I posted racial comments at Chronicles for years. They never asked me to leave, but I’ve since realised they’ve all read the racially oriented sites.

Dr. Fleming isn’t a coward I think but an authentic anti-nationalist. He wrote an article recently in Chronicles on how nationalism inevitably leads to empire and dual morality, and I’ve read countless other articles by him suggesting such a view as well. I nevertheless recommend people to read the magazine - the racial right is still dealing with insanity. A fusion of sanity and racialism is needed between the two.


13

Posted by Woody on Sun, 06 Mar 2011 00:50 | #

Leon is asking PF and Uh for advice on how to pick up women.  Truly surreal.

The first port of call should be Silver, who at least has picking up Thai hookers down to a science.


14

Posted by Woodrow on Sun, 06 Mar 2011 01:05 | #

someone posting under the name “Leon Haller”[...]can talk about comparative penis size or how his relationships have failed

Sam, I seem to recall you once gushing over the respect you have for Leon’s commentary.  Apparently it’s a package deal.


15

Posted by Jimmy Marr on Sun, 06 Mar 2011 01:40 | #

Apparently it’s a package deal.

And a small a package at that. smile


16

Posted by Leon Haller on Sun, 06 Mar 2011 09:09 | #

Posted by Sam Davidson on March 05, 2011, 06:22 PM | #

If the admins on this site are serious why are they allowing someone posting under the name “Leon Haller” to HIJACK A THREAD ABOUT WHITE GENOCIDE so he can talk about comparative penis size or how his relationships have failed?

Sam,

Obviously you haven’t followed the discussion.

Comparative penis size (between whites and blacks, which you don’t mention), incidentally, seems to be a major issue for Philippe Rushton, whom Jared Taylor has called “the world’s greatest living racial scientist”, no mean praise from a major source.

Of course, what is interesting is that I have a lengthy, impersonal comment about white extinction immediately above yours. No comments on that, which is a bit disappointing.

It would be very instructive to have an intellectual but neutral party compare my stuff to most of what others publish here - and see whose material he finds more pointed, enlightening, even amusing, perhaps.


17

Posted by Leon Haller on Sun, 06 Mar 2011 09:18 | #

Leon is asking PF and Uh for advice on how to pick up women.  Truly surreal. (Woody)

What the fuck are you talking about? Where do I ask advice from anyone? I declined PF’s offer of such advice! I don’t even remember “uh” being part of this discussion.

Actually, from what I read here, I strongly suspect that I could be giving huge amounts of dating advice (and probably other types of (professional, financial) advice) to many regulars.

I hate saying this, but there is a lot of inanity among the insights in these parts. There is considerable misunderstanding of female psychology; gross unfamiliarity with real Jews; tremendous economic and financial ignorance routinely exhibited; as well as endless ill-thought out bromides and general ideological thinking substituting for real attempts at useful analysis.


18

Posted by Leon Haller on Sun, 06 Mar 2011 09:30 | #

Leon,

I posted racial comments at Chronicles for years. They never asked me to leave, but I’ve since realised they’ve all read the racially oriented sites.

Dr. Fleming isn’t a coward I think but an authentic anti-nationalist. He wrote an article recently in Chronicles on how nationalism inevitably leads to empire and dual morality, and I’ve read countless other articles by him suggesting such a view as well. I nevertheless recommend people to read the magazine - the racial right is still dealing with insanity. A fusion of sanity and racialism is needed between the two. (Frank)

I’ve been reading CHRONICLES closely and in whole for two decades, month after month. I must now be one of their longer term subscribers - and by far one of their most diligent readers (even as the mag has massively declined over the past 3 years or so).

I disagree re Fleming. He’s pretty bright, and very learned (note my different emphases: I know any number of people I think possess his IQ; I’ve spoken with him in person, and was impressed, but not remotely intimidated; he is extremely classically well-read, I admit). He is also solidly conservative. Thus, he must realize that the Third World invasion is devastating for the prospects of Western survival, and indeed, he has admirably made immigration a major issue for the magazine. Yet every time someone mentions whites coming together to assert or just defend their own interests, he starts whining, banning people, trying to needlessly complicate the issue, or otherwise engaging in “reverse-PC”; ie, acknowledging problems associated with nonwhites, but then trying to find ways, however tortured, to blame (liberal, neocon) whites for having somehow created the mess.

For Fleming, nonwhites are never really a problem in themselves - and natural racist responses are morally worse than the original problems which called forth those responses.


19

Posted by PF on Sun, 06 Mar 2011 23:59 | #

Leon Haller wrote:

What the fuck are you talking about? Where do I ask advice from anyone? I declined PF’s offer of such advice! I don’t even remember “uh” being part of this discussion.

You begged me and uh to give you advice, just read higher up in this thread, Leon!!

Leon Haller wrote:

I seem to keep having these issues with women… I can never find the quality ones - only Russian immigrant skanks who I’ve been able to lure to my bed with promises of citizenship.

Remember that comment?

Then I politely recommended the services of Brigadier PF and Field Marshall Leptini, who quite frankly are two of the most fearless poonani squires to ever set foot on American soil. This isn’t embittered Roissy’s club skank carousel or Leon’s picking-Russian-girls-up-from-the-airport adventures: when PF flexes the mercian dimples and Leptini flashes the golden grill, girls update their facebook profiles - do you understand what I’m saying to you, Leon? Try to read between the lines here - not everything we need to know as men will appear in serialized form in Chronicles, OK?

I’m trying to tell you that my needs get met without handing out green cards. Real men don’t have to go slumming for slavic peasant trim - you won’t see me carrying a pocket dictionary around the airport stuttering ‘Horrowshow, horrorshow’.

Leon wrote:

Actually, from what I read here, I strongly suspect that I could be giving huge amounts of dating advice (and probably other types of (professional, financial) advice) to many regulars.

Most guys here are older, taken, not interested in the hunt, and/or suffering with personality-issues which make dating impossible. Plus it isn’t hard to infer what your method is: douse a Langenscheidt’s dictionary with chloroform and go after clueless Ukrainian girls. If your clumsy broken Ukrainglish doesn’t work, just stick the book in their face.

I’m here to say that there is a better way, broseph.


20

Posted by PF on Mon, 07 Mar 2011 00:18 | #

apologies apologies….

Sorry Leon for the above post, I was in a mean mood and honestly I was just being a troll. All the stuff I said was only to amuse myself and has nothing to do with what I actually think of you - which is really with respect for a dedicated, highly intelligent and multi-faceted white man. A brother in arms, in all seriousness.

I just wanted to have a laugh and paint some funny mental pictures. Plus everybody struggles with women and modern relationships - none of us is any better than the other in my honest opinion. You’re probably ahead of the game by a longshot, from what you’ve said. Putting another guy down is way lame.

Some of the other guys on here might just be messing with you too… no worries mate. wink


21

Posted by Hamish on Mon, 07 Mar 2011 01:33 | #

I seem to keep having these issues with women… I can never find the quality ones - only Russian immigrant skanks who I’ve been able to lure to my bed with promises of citizenship.

Cease and desist from this immoral behavior at once.

You seem disturbingly similar to those Fox producers who came up with that Joe Millionaire show.


22

Posted by Leon Haller on Mon, 07 Mar 2011 06:53 | #

Christian,

Thanks for deleting my comments re the Asian/white issue, you jerk! You could have just deleted my personal stuff (which was posted both to correct misunderstandings, but also to amuse). Why did you delete my miscegenation comments?! I would have liked to have saved some of that (I just hadn’t done it yet). I made a lot of serious points in my exchanges with Guest Lurker.

In fact, you deleted my original comments re the difference between white “genocide” and liberals who undermine the conditions for white survival. Fuck! Post those back, shithead.

Don’t let my Christian commitments fool you. Real Christians (this is weird, given your name ...) are just, not foolish, cowardly or obsequious. I don’t like this kind of highhandedness, and will remember it.


23

Posted by Leon Haller on Mon, 07 Mar 2011 07:05 | #

PF,

You’re witty. Welcome back (thought you’d left after contracting Heideggeria).

My Russian was very pretty, and skilled in ways men appreciate. But heartless, narcissistic and cunning. But that, along with much else, is past.

That whole exchange had little to do with me originally. I merely pointed out the dangers of quality white women in CA (and elsewhere) with dating options now choosing Asian males over (presumably) available white men. I really wish my serious observations on those matters had not been deleted.

To reiterate for the record: I never asked anyone for dating advice here. I mentioned some lessons from my own extensive experience.


24

Posted by Leon Haller on Mon, 07 Mar 2011 07:48 | #

Sorry Leon for the above post, I was in a mean mood and honestly I was just being a troll. All the stuff I said was only to amuse myself and has nothing to do with what I actually think of you - which is really with respect for a dedicated, highly intelligent and multi-faceted white man. A brother in arms, in all seriousness. (PF)

PF,

BTW, thanks for your kind comments. Whether I am intelligent or multi-faceted is open to debate. What I do resent is those (not talking about you) who question my dedication, just because I, say, don’t think we can blame all or even most of our problems on Jews or Zionism, or don’t believe that RaHoWa or Racial Armageddon is right around the corner, “in a matter of months”, as Narrator opined recently.

I am as radical as anyone here in my commitment to preserving the white race and the civilization it alone created and can alone sustain. I do not think there is virtue, however, in theoretical radicalism merely for its own sake. What matters is that we adopt above all a ruthless commitment to seeing our situation clearly. Yes, that means calling attention to dangers, but not exaggerating them.

It also means tailoring our messages properly for public consumption. For example, most people here mock my essential (but NOT fundamentalist) Christianity. I understand their position. I’ve read books by any number of atheists, and am not close minded in religious matters. My theologic-political views, which I intend to elaborate in future scholarship (I’m still reading about the issues, and formulating my final thoughts), are very unusual. I am Catholic modernist / liberal in theology, with a thoroughly non-literalist approach to Scripture, yet Hard (Racial) Right ideologically. That is a rare combination, which needs its spokesman.

But even if all forms of supernaturalism are finally, empirically false, it is a truth to which we must adapt our rhetoric that, as I’ve pointed out in the past, most white Americans are Christians, and the vast bulk of conservative white Americans are real Christians. Take immigration. In the US, it is a fact of empirical political science that self-identified white Christians are more opposed to it than any other large demographic. It is also a fact that white atheists are much more likely a) to be leftists, and b) to be pro-immigration. I cannot explain why that should be so (my own sense is that most white atheists should be against immigration, and most other aspects of the Left’s white-dispossessionist agenda), but given that it is, does it make any strategic sense to associate white preservationism with atheism? That is insane; indeed, only marginally less so than associating our just cause with Nazism, as the Jewish Left cunningly has done.

The trick in democracies is that one usually can only change the electorate in gradualist fashion. What is more successful is the Aristotelian “revolution within the form”, whereby the outer garb of the regime is preserved, even while it essence is hollowed out (the Augustan revolution being history’s most prominent example: Rome changed from a republic to an empire, but the outward institutional signs of Republican Rome were not discarded, instead transmogrified into imperial appendages which nevertheless allowed for the maintenance of the image of historical continuity), as opposed to radical calls for wholesale change, which invariably inertial voters normally, sagely reject. 

So let no one confuse calls for rhetorical moderation with abandonment of core values. One often catches more flies with honey than vinegar, after all!


25

Posted by Hamish on Mon, 07 Mar 2011 09:08 | #

Take immigration. In the US, it is a fact of empirical political science that self-identified white Christians are more opposed to it than any other large demographic. It is also a fact that white atheists are much more likely a) to be leftists, and b) to be pro-immigration. I cannot explain why that should be so (my own sense is that most white atheists should be against immigration, and most other aspects of the Left’s white-dispossessionist agenda), but given that it is, does it make any strategic sense to associate white preservationism with atheism?

I agree with you on these points.

Can’t say I agree with the idea of “breeding out the faith gene” which is sometimes alluded to here (anyone know who came up with it?).

Also can’t say I agree with that Greg Johnson’s mad idea of associating WN with that crazy person Faye and his idea of creating man-animal hybrids.

That is insane; indeed, only marginally less so than associating our just cause with Nazism, as the Jewish Left cunningly has done.

I see what you’re saying, but the problem is that any org that allows Jews in will be taken over by Jewish interests.

They’re just better at us at stealthily steering orgs in their desired direction.

Leon, do you support the idea of a non-Neo-Nazi group excluding Jews from membership?


26

Posted by Leon Haller on Mon, 07 Mar 2011 11:28 | #

Leon, do you support the idea of a non-Neo-Nazi group excluding Jews from membership? (Hamish)

I’m complicated, maybe confused, in my JQ views. I’m also overly influenced by my having too many close Jewish friends, as well as and especially by having several Jewish racial-conservative friends.

I have to consider this at greater length later, as the workday beckons.

Short answer? I see your point. It would have been better for US and the West if the Jews had never left Israel/Palestine. It would be better for us if they all returned there. But they are here, and they won’t leave voluntarily. What to do?

My views will elicit storms of outrage here. I think we should make an alliance with Jewry - but it must be forged in steel, with both sides held to account (unlike today, where everything is for the Jews, nothing for us). We must state clearly that our goal is to save white, Christian civilization. We must lay out the specifics (no immigration, ultimate nonwhite repatriation from Europe, no affirmative racism, real, white history taught in schools, only white Christian and national traditionalist public holidays, pro-white-fertility tax and social policies, etc). We tell Jews that we wish to increase white (Aryan) birthrates above all else (after nonwhite immigration has been terminated). We tell the Jews to support us, beginning with ending their support for immigration, and making sizable donations to nationalist parties, in exchange for which we will let them conduct business, attend synagogues, and live in our midst, if already here (no Jewish immigration, however). We will also morally support Israel in world opinion, and international bodies.

If a group is committed to this .. if nationalist principles are written into its very organizational charter ... then what is wrong with letting Jews join, given that, whether we like it or not, they are in our societies already? I have Jewish friends who are very civilized, very conservative, very racist. They are also very intelligent, mostly very successful, and mostly affluent to rich. Could we not use persons like that, provided that we ourselves are inflexible and unyielding in our understanding of the white, Christian character of our organization and countries?


27

Posted by anon on Mon, 07 Mar 2011 18:18 | #

Could we not use persons like that, provided that we ourselves are inflexible and unyielding in our understanding of the white, Christian character of our organization and countries?

“Persons like that” would ultimately use us, not we them. That’s just the way it goes, Leon.


28

Posted by Thunder on Mon, 07 Mar 2011 18:30 | #

Guessedworker, Christian:
Have comments to this project been moved.  I posted a relevant comment about the Australian Minister of Immigration which is no longer here.  I hope it is collected elsewhere?


29

Posted by Ryan on Mon, 07 Mar 2011 19:00 | #

Also can’t say I agree with that Greg Johnson’s mad idea of associating WN with that crazy person Faye and his idea of creating man-animal hybrids.

It’s because Greg Johnson gets turned on by horsecock.


30

Posted by marlowe on Mon, 07 Mar 2011 19:13 | #

LHaller:

My views will elicit storms of outrage here. I think we should make an alliance with Jewry - but it must be forged in steel, with both sides held to account (unlike today, where everything is for the Jews, nothing for us). We must state clearly that our goal is to save white, Christian civilization. We must lay out the specifics (no immigration, ultimate nonwhite repatriation from Europe, no affirmative racism, real, white history taught in schools, only white Christian and national traditionalist public holidays, pro-white-fertility tax and social policies, etc). We tell Jews that we wish to increase white (Aryan) birthrates above all else (after nonwhite immigration has been terminated). We tell the Jews to support us, beginning with ending their support for immigration, and making sizable donations to nationalist parties, in exchange for which we will let them conduct business, attend synagogues, and live in our midst, if already here (no Jewish immigration, however). We will also morally support Israel in world opinion, and international bodies.

So it’s to be a “forged in steel” alliance that requires not only their consent, but their permission? Like an agreement?  I’m afraid you don’t know who you are dealing with.


31

Posted by Guessedworker on Mon, 07 Mar 2011 20:18 | #

Thunder,

Christian is working on the next stage of development for the project, which will come shortly.


32

Posted by A Swain on Mon, 07 Mar 2011 21:08 | #

Here are three links that irrefutably prove anti-White race hate.

The criminals involved should have been arrested and charged at the time they committed their hate crimes against the European-descended White rate, but nonetheless, it’s never too late for leaders and advocats of the White race to start the necessary proceedings to press for arrest on the grounds of such charges.

http://www.dallasnews.com/news/community-news/dallas/headlines/20110215-shouting-match-between-speakers-john-wiley-price-shuts-down-dallas-county-commissioners-court.ece

http://www.mashada.com/forums/politics/69228-wanjiru-white-people-haters-we-belong-human-race.html

http://crooksandliars.com/david-neiwert/going-gets-tough-white-haters-get-go


33

Posted by Leon Haller on Tue, 08 Mar 2011 06:55 | #

So it’s to be a “forged in steel” alliance that requires not only their consent, but their permission? Like an agreement?  I’m afraid you don’t know who you are dealing with. (marlowe)

How do you get that interpretation (permission?) from what I said and you copied?


34

Posted by Captainchaos on Tue, 08 Mar 2011 07:31 | #

Leon,

You need to learn how to pick your fights.  You know me, I’ll get hyper-aggressive with it.  But always within the confines of a larger strategic vision - at least so I hope.  Of course, sometimes I’ll just say “Fuck it” and toss in a grenade.


35

Posted by Leon Haller on Tue, 08 Mar 2011 11:39 | #

CC,

Yes. What I really need to do is to stop compulsive blogging, and start my formal writing. That’s a long road, getting real academic, and then scholarly, credibility.

Soon, I’m going to drop off the internet permanently, and concentrate on articles, essays and my book on racial ethics.

Of course, it would be nice to streamline my life across the board, too. Actually, it would be nice if we could all earn our daily bread through racial activism, rather than dissipating our already collectively limited energies on racially unproductive ‘real work’.


36

Posted by Captainchaos on Tue, 08 Mar 2011 17:10 | #

Leon,

I think blogging is a more effective medium for communicating our ideas than the production of boring tomes.  What must come to pass is a mass movement explicitly predicated on achieving racially exclusive living space.  There is no substitute.  Look to the success of a streamlined and radical message in upsetting political power in the Middle East.  Yes, it did really happen.  And can again, here.


37

Posted by Johan Van Vlaams on Wed, 09 Mar 2011 03:45 | #

Malema:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Gts8W-PSnLU&feature=related


38

Posted by Leon Haller on Wed, 09 Mar 2011 08:46 | #

Leon,

I think blogging is a more effective medium for communicating our ideas than the production of boring tomes.  What must come to pass is a mass movement explicitly predicated on achieving racially exclusive living space.  There is no substitute.  Look to the success of a streamlined and radical message in upsetting political power in the Middle East.  Yes, it did really happen.  And can again, here. (CC)

Yes, but ...

We are in a very different situation from the Arabs. They are/were living under obvious tyrannies, often pitting one sub-nation (“tribe”) against another. That superficially sounds like our situation, but obviously isn’t. For one thing, we have the vote (or its illusion), they have not.

Our situation is that our people need to be convinced of their dispossession, and eventual extinction - and of the moral rightness of doing something to stop it. Or, at least a substantial and vigorous enough minority of them. That’s where the totality of our work comes in. We need everything - from academic works, to journalism, to political organizing, to ideological activism, to mass media, to street activism - all working to fulfill some “nationalist minimum”, like ending immigration. We are a long way from there, unfortunately.


39

Posted by Aquila on Fri, 11 Mar 2011 22:27 | #

“I think blogging is a more effective medium for communicating our ideas than the production of boring tomes.”

If you are posting comments on a political blog it won’t have any effect. Blogs with political contents are just places where people of the same “club” meet, nothing will change.

You can hope for some change only on more neutral places like newspaper websites.


40

Posted by PHIL WHITE on Sun, 13 Mar 2011 16:25 | #

HI: Saw your request for help over at whitakeronline.org

THis is the best I’ve got.

S. Steinlight, former vice president of AJC, wrote an article for CIS (center for immigration studies)in November of 2001.  It is on line.
  “The Jewish Stake In Americas Changing Demography”

About half way down the 15,000 word article he says “We can divide and rule’

S. Steinlight, former vice president of AJC, wrote an article for CIS (center for immigration studies)in October of 2001.  It is on line.
  “The Jewish Stake In Americas Changing Demography”

About half way down the 15,000 word article he says “We can divide and rule’


“For perhaps another generation, an optimistic forecast, the Jewish community is thus in a position where it will be able to divide and conquer and enter into selective coalitions that support our agendas. But the day will surely come when an effective Asian-American alliance will actually bring Chinese Americans, Japanese American…...”

The Jewish Stake in America’s
Changing Demography
Reconsidering a Misguided Immigration Policy
October 2001
By Stephen Steinlight
Download the .pdf version


41

Posted by professor edwards on Tue, 22 Mar 2011 12:57 | #

‘Discourse is war’ is a retarded slogan, and in any case it is stolen from a 1980s leftist slogan (‘Rational Discourse is War’).


42

Posted by A Swain on Wed, 23 Mar 2011 07:50 | #

Anti-White race hate spotlight on Greg Dyke, former Director-General of the British Broadcasting Corporation.

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-12841/Dyke-BBC-hideously-white.html

http://www.independent.co.uk/news/media/bbc-is-hideously-white-says-dyke-702583.html

Dyke is thought to be of part-Ashkenazi origin.

Interesting later development.  Could the two characters mentioned in the following news item be of the same origin, perhaps?

“On 10 March 2010, it was reported that he had been approached by Alexander Lebedev and his son Evgeny Lebedev to edit The Independent and The Independent on Sunday newspapers”


43

Posted by Pete on Sun, 27 Mar 2011 13:43 | #

Report on CNN about a county that is deemed “too white” and how it is in the process of ensuring it recruits more non-whites in violation of Article 2 section (c)

http://www.cnn.com/video/#/video/us/2011/03/26/white.county.diversity.cnn?hpt=C2


44

Posted by Voir Dire on Sat, 16 Apr 2011 23:37 | #

Jew Judge, Justice Brennan, Gave Us Destructive “Anchor Baby” Interpretation of 14th Amendment (What Will the First-Amendment-Hating Radical Jewess Elena Kagan Bring to the Table?) that Dramatically Transformed U.S. Demographics and Helped Bankrupt U.S.

Justice Brennan’s Footnote Gave Us Anchor Babies
by Ann Coulter
08/04/2010

For a hundred years, that was how it stood, with only one case adding the caveat that children born to LEGAL permanent residents of the U.S., gainfully employed, and who were not employed by a foreign government would also be deemed citizens under the 14th Amendment. (United States v. Wong Kim Ark, 1898.)

And then, out of the blue in 1982, Justice Brennan slipped a footnote into his 5-4 opinion in Plyler v. Doe, asserting that “no plausible distinction with respect to Fourteenth Amendment ‘jurisdiction’ can be drawn between resident aliens whose entry into the United States was lawful, and resident aliens whose entry was unlawful.” (Other than the part about one being lawful and the other not.)

Brennan’s authority for this lunatic statement was that it appeared in a 1912 book written by Clement L. Bouve. (Yes, THE Clement L. Bouve—the one you’ve heard so much about over the years.) Bouve was not a senator, not an elected official, certainly not a judge—just some guy who wrote a book.

http://www.humanevents.com/article.php?id=38409
Friday, August 1, 1997 | return to: national

Brennan: An unparalleled religious liberty champion
WASHINGTON—Former Supreme Court Justice William Brennan will long be remembered as a towering figure of American law and a champion of individual rights who dramatically influenced American life.

Less well-known is that he is the only justice ever to wear a camouflage yarmulke in chambers.

http://www.jweekly.com/article/full/6258/brennan-an-unparalleled-religious-liberty-champion/

Jewish Grins & Grimaces From Elena Kagan

http://www.realjewnews.com/?p=517

Why Are Abortionists, Jews, Gays & Leftists Pushing Kagan?

http://www.realzionistnews.com/?p=503


45

Posted by philipdru on Tue, 19 Apr 2011 11:45 | #

“Africa for the Africans, Asia for the Asians, White countries for everybody.”

The same principle governs ‘British’ nationalism. That is why I despise it and its self-hating, overwhelmingly English adherents. Scots are Scots, Irish are Irish while the English are….er, British - an object of abuse even to those who plunder her and inescapably the one necessary sacrificial offering to sustaining an outworn and unjust ideology. Does it matter what colour is the hand that plunges a knife between your shoulder blades?


46

Posted by Dungeoneer on Thu, 21 Apr 2011 10:02 | #

Posted by philipdru on April 19, 2011, 03:45 PM | #

“Does it matter what colour is the hand that plunges a knife between your shoulder blades?”

Any type of meaningless wordism debate is grist to the anti-white pro-genocide mill.

This is the white genocide evidence project page,no?


47

Posted by Jordon Yampolsky on Mon, 05 Sep 2011 05:55 | #

Very interesting post. Thank you for sharing.


48

Posted by Antifascist on Thu, 01 Nov 2012 01:54 | #

Given the anti-White hegemony that Whites are up against from above, along with the turmoil and throngs of anti-Whites that they are up against on all fronts, an endogenous approach is the most practical for the coordination of White separatism.


There is no evidence of an “Anti-white” conspiracy, you racist fools are so ignorant that you believe all “white” people are the same, you became white supremacists, because you have a stupid belief in   white power, which you learnt through acculturation, from your society, which taught you it was okay to be racist. It is not okay to be racist! You believe in racism, because you would have no self-esteem without your psychotic ideology.

I suggest you white supremacists read this book by Dr.Noel Ignatiev he will enlighten you to the truth of history, and why your society promotes white racial supremacy.  http://www.amazon.com/Irish-Became-White-Routledge-Classics/dp/0415963095


You don’t understand that we are all a member of 1 race, the human race, we are 99.95% genetically similar, amongst human ethnic groups, so that makes it impossible for intelligence, or behavioral differences to exist among ethnic groups, except by means of racism, sociological differences, and prejudice in education.

The White people are reigning supreme already, because of racial prejudice against non-whites in the workplace, education, police bias against non-whites, it is a disgrace, for you to spew your hate speech and motivate others to view different ethnic groups, as inferior, it should be illegal for you to incite hatred the way you do.


49

Posted by Antifascist on Thu, 01 Nov 2012 02:35 | #

@Daniels angry  You are a racist anti-semite.  You spew forth, lies and fascist propaganda. White supremacy is evil, and murderous, all of you racists should be imprisoned for inciting racial hatred, your hate speech is intolerable.


50

Posted by Wandrin on Thu, 01 Nov 2012 03:06 | #

Dr.Noel Ignatiev

is a Jewish racist and supremacist who, along with many others like him, is using cultural manipulation to try and engineer the global stealth genocide of White people.


51

Posted by daniels. on Thu, 01 Nov 2012 03:11 | #

...

Posted by Antifascist on November 01, 2012, 02:35 AM | #

@Daniels   You are a racist


If what you mean by that is that I organize taxonomies, classifications of people - and see that they ought to be accountable as such, for ecological reasons and for the purpose of sustainable co-existence, yes.

anti-semite. 


I do not hate Jews, they hate us and have set forth ideas and actions which lead to the destruction of our evolution, which is our religion. We are forced to defend ourselves against them in the name of our god terms, the 14 Words.

You spew forth, lies and fascist propaganda.

No, it is you who does this.

White supremacy is evil,

If I were a supremacist, that might be evil. But I am not anyway, I am a White separatist.


and murderous,


YOU are murderous. Have been and intend to continue.


all of you racists should be imprisoned for inciting racial hatred,

How dare you use this nonsense term to try to prohibit us from defending ourselves and saving our lives. It is you who is inciting hatred by attempting to prohibit our separatism from non-Europeans

your hate speech is intolerable

Your propaganda and rhetoric which is aimed at confusing and misdirecting European people from defending themselves is intolerable.


52

Posted by daniels. on Thu, 01 Nov 2012 03:15 | #

...

Posted by Antifascist on November 01, 2012, 02:35 AM | #

@Daniels   You are a racist


If what you mean by that is that I organize taxonomies, classifications of people - and see that they ought to be accountable as such, for ecological reasons and for the purpose of sustainable co-existence, yes.

anti-semite. 


I do not hate Jews, they hate us and have set forth ideas and actions which lead to the destruction of our evolution, which is our religion. We are forced to defend ourselves against them in the name of our god terms, the 14 Words.

You spew forth, lies and fascist propaganda.

No, it is you who does this.

White supremacy is evil,

If I were a supremacist, that might be evil. But I am not anyway, I am a White separatist.


and murderous,


YOU are murderous. Have been and intend to continue.


all of you racists should be imprisoned for inciting racial hatred,

How dare you use this nonsense term to try to prohibit us from defending ourselves and saving our lives. It is you who is inciting hatred by attempting to prohibit our separatism from non-Europeans

your hate speech is intolerable

Your propaganda and impositions, which are aimed at confusing and misdirecting European people from defending themselves, are intolerable.


53

Posted by antifascist on Thu, 01 Nov 2012 03:45 | #


The white race is a historically constructed social formation. It consists of all those who partake of the privileges of the white skin in this society. Its most wretched members share a status higher, in certain respects, than that of the most exalted persons excluded from it, in return for which they give their support to a system that degrades them.

The key to solving the social problems of our age is to abolish the white race, which means no more and no less than abolishing the privileges of the white skin. Until that task is accomplished, even partial reform will prove elusive, because white influence permeates every issue, domestic and foreign, in US society.
<u>
The existence of the white race depends on the willingness of those assigned to it to place their racial interests above class, gender, or any other interests they hold. The defection of enough of its members to make it unreliable as a predictor of behavior will lead to its collapse.</u>


54

Posted by antifascist on Thu, 01 Nov 2012 03:49 | #

Whiteness is
not a culture…
Whiteness has
nothing to do
with culture and
everything to
do with social
position. It is
nothing but a
reflection of
privilege, and
exists for no
reason other
than to
defend it.


55

Posted by daniels. on Thu, 01 Nov 2012 04:02 | #

The key to solving the social problems of our age is to abolish the white race


Thank you for making it clear that your intent is to genocide my European peoples.


56

Posted by antifascist on Thu, 01 Nov 2012 04:07 | #

I do not hate you or anyone else for the color of her skin. What we hate is a system that confers privileges (and burdens) on people because of their color. It is not fair skin that makes people white; it is fair skin in a certain kind of society, one that attaches social importance to skin color. When we say we want to abolish the white race, we do not mean we want to exterminate people with fair skin. We mean that we want to do away with the social meaning of skin color, thereby abolishing the white race as a social category. Consider this parallel: To be against royalty does not mean wanting to kill the king. It means wanting to do away with crowns, thrones, titles, and the privileges attached to them. In our view, whiteness has a lot in common with royalty: they are both social formations that carry unearned advantages.


57

Posted by Wandrin on Thu, 01 Nov 2012 04:53 | #

When we say we want to abolish the white race, we do not mean we want to exterminate people with fair skin.

You might not. The Jewish supremacists who are using cultural manipulation to engineer the genocide of white people do want that.


58

Posted by daniels. on Thu, 01 Nov 2012 05:18 | #

.........
Anitfia, judging by your argument, I would say that you are probably Black, a Black woman or a mudshark: that is, you are not well informed, so I will try to go easy on you: you need a few things made clear to you.

You say:

Posted by antifascist on November 01, 2012, 04:07 AM | #

I do not hate you or anyone else for the color of her skin.

Skin tone is not the reason that I nor any European that I know wants to survive and be separate from non-Europeans.

What we hate is a system that confers privileges (and burdens) on people because of their color.

I am against these things too except for one point: we are privileged to be and to live with our own - as are you.

It is not fair skin that makes people white; it is fair skin in a certain kind of society, one that attaches social importance to skin color.

This is bullshit that you have been taught by Jewish interests and those trained by them.

There is an evolutionary category of Europeans distinct by having evolved in the context of Europe for 41,000 years. We as White Nationalists value that more than anything and seek to preserve our existence.

When we say we want to abolish the white race, we do not mean we want to exterminate people with fair skin.

Fine, then we must live separately from you because we cannot assimilate your exponential propagation, population, your people’s propensity for violence and the general ramification of your people living amongst us - destruction of our habitats and European co-evolution,

We mean that we want to do away with the social meaning of skin color, thereby abolishing the white race as a social category.

Europeans generally have lighter skin than Africans and it is a connected to our genetic evolution (although there are some Europeans who are fairly dark) - it is a genetic evolution 41,000 years old, which we do not want destroyed anymore than you might not want a rainforest, endangered species or for an African tribe to be eliminated.

Consider this parallel: To be against royalty does not mean wanting to kill the king. It means wanting to do away with crowns, thrones, titles, and the privileges attached to them.

I am a leftist as are many White Nationalists that I know. If you have complaint with elites, White, Jewish or otherwise, who are imposing internationalism as opposed to bio-diversity, who are forcing our mixing and exploitation of our peoples, a distinctly non-ecological agenda of human integration, then you are right to be opposed to them and I agree.

In our view, whiteness has a lot in common with royalty: they are both social formations that carry unearned advantages.

That may be your view now but it is in need of critical refinement because it is a view that stems from a deliberate distortion to mean all Whites are privileged and guilty of your oppression (instead of a few pigs; along with Jewish elitists and others) a vision sold to you by Jewish interests. There are bad Whites at the top of the money ladder, to be sure. But if you are honest in your concern and inquiry as to whom the elitists are, then your inquiry will lead you to a disproportunate representation by Jewish interests. See Wandrin’s remark - he is right. Jews, though usually White skinned, are not White - their genetics are not predominantly of native European ancestry.

These are distinctions that you must make if you do not wish to punish the innocent.

For Europeans to want so survive, to live in their own lands, to be with their own women, free of servitude to non-Europeans, is not privilege, it is warranted by our evolution.


59

Posted by antifascist on Thu, 01 Nov 2012 07:21 | #

@Hesper

Passionate hatred of the Jews is almost certain to be futile,
for violent emotions prevent rational thought.


Jewish people have done no harm to white people, they have been persecuted and tortured, and murdered by white people, for over 1000 years, in the holocaust, in pograms, and crusades.

The obsession that white supremacists have, with demonizing all jewish people, is a sign of the white supremacists’ psychoticism,  and obsessive -compulsive disorders, and paranoia.


These white supremacists, on Majority Rights don’t understand that;


<u>1.  The white race is
a club. Certain
people are enrolled
in it at birth, without
their consent,
and brought up
according to its
rules. For the most
part they go through
life accepting the
privileges of
membership,
without reflecting
on the costs


2.When it comes to
abolishing the white
race, the task is not
to win over more
whites to oppose
“racism”; there
are “anti-racists”
enough already to
do the job.
The task is to
gather together a
minority determined
to make it
impossible for
anyone to be white.</u>


60

Posted by daniels. on Thu, 01 Nov 2012 08:35 | #

/.

Today indecent prole profanities and innuendos and no doubt tomorrow CNN interviews or C-SPAN televised discussions at the Kennedy Centre to spread White-wing views.

Those venues are for Jewish windbags like you, Hesper. There already exist a myriad of such Jewish media for you to spew disinformation, as you do.

I normally don’t advise banning someone from this site, but you ought to be, because all you do is post up droves of spam in an attempt to drown out careful considerations.

You are are worse than worthless. What you do is evil and you should commit suicide. It is also manifest in your bringing this challenged individual with you, planting these lies on his/her pathetic lips:



Posted by antifascist on November 01, 2012, 07:21 AM | #

Jewish people have done no harm to white people, they have been persecuted and tortured, and murdered by white people, for over 1000 years, in the holocaust, in pograms, and crusades.

Time to get your facts and causes straight Antifa. How many Whites were killed by Jewish Marxists, in the Gulags, by Dziersinsky, Jagoda, Yusef, Kagananovich to name a few; and through Jewish control of politics, its wars, banking and business, media propaganda brainwashing and demoralization, in the name of its false renditions of rreligion,  its academic lies by which it controls the avenue of professionalism and the dissemination of its the kind of evil, anti-White nonsense that they have you mouthing; its control of the law and courts, through which it floods our lands with people like you, subjecting us to your violence, as you are conditioned by them to think you are righteous to be that way against us; along with a presumption that you should be entitled to our lands, resources and people (and you call us elitists antifa?)

Who has killed more of whom, Jews or Whites? and why? in these past few thousand years and in recent history? Who is promoting genocide but Jewish interests? Who are they putting up to it but people like you by first lying that we do not really exist as a biological category and then by making you feel entitled to do whatever you like with regard to my people (who don’t really exist?).

In any event, neither I nor my ancestors killed any Jews. We want to be free from them in our midst and from their imposition of ignorant, self righteous, impulsive and violent sorts like you - whose heads they fill with bizarre and evil nonsense such as Whites don’t really exist/but they need to be genocided. You have stated your objective to genocide Europeans antifa, so noted.

By the way, my ancestors had nothing to do with Black slavery either. The only thing I ever want from you is nothing.


61

Posted by antifascist on Thu, 01 Nov 2012 08:48 | #

Most jewish people abhore marxism, especially those jews who lived under the oppression of the national socialist state of the Soviet Union. You cannot specifically name one ocassion in history, where jewish people committed genocide against white people, or pogroms, or crusades against white people. Your beliefs about all jews, are based on psychotic speculation about a big jewish conspiracy, that 13.5 million people, who happen to be jewish are involved in, against white people. This believe of yours is Alex jones style paranoia, except with an underlying psychotic white supremacist ideology, instead of an ambiguous hatred of “the globalists” in the case of Alex Jones.


62

Posted by Wandrin on Thu, 01 Nov 2012 09:09 | #

antifat

Jewish supremacists are attempting to use cultural manipulation to engineer the global genocide of White people.


63

Posted by daniels. on Thu, 01 Nov 2012 09:30 | #

Posted by antifascist on November 01, 2012, 08:48 AM | #

Most jewish people abhore marxism, especially those jews who lived under the oppression of the national socialist state of the Soviet Union. You cannot specifically name one ocassion in history, where jewish people committed genocide against white people, or pogroms, or crusades against white people. Your beliefs about all jews, are based on psychotic speculation about a big jewish conspiracy, that 13.5 million people, who happen to be jewish are involved in, against white people. This believe of yours is Alex jones style paranoia, except with an underlying psychotic white supremacist ideology, instead of an ambiguous hatred of “the globalists” in the case of Alex Jones.


Is it really necessary to have this idiot post here?


64

Posted by uKn_Leo on Thu, 01 Nov 2012 14:06 | #

Posted by daniels. on November 01, 2012, 09:30 AM | #

‘Is it really necessary to have this idiot post here?’


Daniel, can Anti-Fascists posts please stay up. At least the ones already here. They are highly informative. I would like to be able to use them elsewhere to highlight the kind of hate-filled, psycopathic lunatics we are up against.

 


65

Posted by Thorn on Thu, 01 Nov 2012 14:09 | #

Is it really necessary to have this idiot post here?

Agree.

These Aliynskyite trolls seem to show up at every blog they perceive as counter to their Cultural Marxist agenda.

In truth these slippery little slimeball commies are, in all actuality, reverse nazis. I.e. their hateful modus operandi is to relentlessly and maliciously demonize anyone —repeat, ANYONE —that defends the right of the white race to exist.

 

 

 

 


66

Posted by Thorn on Thu, 01 Nov 2012 14:09 | #

Is it really necessary to have this idiot post here?

Agree.

These Aliynskyite trolls seem to show up at every blog they perceive as counter to their Cultural Marxist agenda.

In truth these slippery little slimeball commies are, in all actuality, reverse nazis. I.e. their hateful modus operandi is to relentlessly and maliciously demonize anyone —repeat, ANYONE —that defends the right of the white race to exist.

 

 

 

 


67

Posted by uKn_Leo on Thu, 01 Nov 2012 14:44 | #

They’re complete morons Thorn. They (Anti-Fa) recently lobbied so hard to ban a far right protest in a part of London that the police banned any protest whatsoever for a month and flooded that area with police. Full police state crackdown on our democratic right to protest. The Anti-Fa claimed this as a great victory. They were on the ground reporting anyone they thought looked ‘far-rightish’ to the police. Over here they are allied with Radical Islamists. Mugs.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lVjtK1_OtsE

 


68

Posted by Leon Haller on Thu, 01 Nov 2012 15:09 | #

Are we just talking to ourselves (or to unconvertable, psychologically deranged antiwhite “antiracists”), or are we all doing our parts relentlessly pushing our views across the mainstream internet?

I saw an article on Yahoo about a new generation Chinese stealth fighter plane, and so quickly posted the following:

Meanwhile Traitor Obama and his fellow traitor Democrats do all they can to gut America’s air force (and navy, and military, and border controls, etc), in order to have as much money as possible to be able to shovel into worthless social(ist) programs, esp for “minorities” (it is whites who are the global minority, and require strong militaries, and domestic gun rights, to defend themselves) and weaken the nation more generally…

We need to be out in the mainstream every chance we get.

 


69

Posted by Thorn on Thu, 01 Nov 2012 15:12 | #

They’re complete morons Thorn.

Vile radical leftist zombies, IMO.

It seems the greatist talent they posses is to memorize then repeat the talking points given to them by their handlers— Ignatiev in antifascist’s case. They demonstrate rote learning in its worst form

Anyway, they’re not worth the time of day.


70

Posted by Leon Haller on Thu, 01 Nov 2012 15:15 | #

Saw article on threat of transnational crime gangs, posted this:

Of course, this and so many other problems derives from our liberal failure to control our border, and from America’s unnecessary (liberal-forced) embrace of “diversity” ... let’s face it: America was better, when America was whiter ...

We gotta be out there, folks, hitting the enemy again and again ... fine arguments for intellectuals are important, but perhaps repetitive sloganeering may ultimately prove more effective?


71

Posted by uKn_Leo on Thu, 01 Nov 2012 15:22 | #

Posted by Leon Haller on November 01, 2012, 03:09 PM | #

‘Are we just talking to ourselves (or to unconvertable, psychologically deranged antiwhite “antiracists”), or are we all doing our parts relentlessly pushing our views across the mainstream internet?’


Yes boss. I have started ‘doing’ comments at the Telegraph as heremodangelcynn. Backing up the Piggott family.


‘Vile radical leftist zombies

not worth the time of day’

Agreed, on all counts!


72

Posted by uKn_Leo on Thu, 01 Nov 2012 15:27 | #

‘fine arguments for intellectuals are important, but perhaps repetitive sloganeering may ultimately prove more effective?’

Good point Leon. I’ll handle the intellectuals and you do the sloganeering!


73

Posted by Dude @antifa on Thu, 01 Nov 2012 15:45 | #

Hey antifascist, it’s great to be racist, jump on in - the water’s lovely and warm!

“Until that task is accomplished, even partial reform will prove elusive”

People of European descent will always be aware of their common descent and therefore their membership of ‘the white race’ (and more locally their English, German, Italian descent too). By imposing costs on whites as whites you increase their awareness of this.

When Europeans lose their leading position in society, you can be assured of the direction, take a look at Zimbabwe or South Africa (or Detroit).

Therefore your political activism is based on utter futility. But please don’t let me stop you.

Emote antifacist, emote!


74

Posted by Thorn on Thu, 01 Nov 2012 15:53 | #

We gotta be out there, folks, hitting the enemy again and again ... fine arguments for intellectuals are important, but perhaps repetitive sloganeering may ultimately prove more effective?

I think so. Evidently the experts that produce political ads do to. They know the vast majority of people think in sound-bites and slogans. Hence the core messages of the candidates—from both major parties— is conveyed via sound-bites, pullquotes and slogans.

We must keep in mind, the grasp of politics for the average person goes no deeper than: the Dems are for the little guy, and the Goopers are for the rich. That’s the mentality we are dealing with. It’s not the the average guy of gal is stupid; it is, at least at this moment, their interests lie in other frivolous areas.

Our monumental task is to make them aware that Whites/Euro-Christians are the target of defamation…and how to fight back.

http://www.resistingdefamation.org/


75

Posted by Mick Lately on Thu, 01 Nov 2012 19:04 | #

I agree with Leon Haller about not giving the enemy any respite. The comments sections on Yahoo! News articles are an easy target.

One phrase I sometimes use is: “we are being done away with”, instead of “White Genocide”, though I use the latter also.

A phrase like “eliding our existence” may well not even register.

Perhaps a little bit of tabloid terror is needed, “buried beneath the patio of history” or something like that. 


76

Posted by Lurker on Thu, 01 Nov 2012 22:42 | #

Jewish people have done no harm to white people, they have been persecuted and tortured, and murdered by white people, for over 1000 years, in the holocaust, in pogroms, and crusades.

But, according to you, jewish people dont exist. Its only whites who separate themselves out socially/culturally using their trick knowledge and racism, therefore everyone else must be the same as each other, thus jews do not exist.

How could whites have holocausts, pogroms, and crusades against the jews when the jews dont exist, how do whites separate them out from everyone else?

But….

You don’t understand that we are all a member of 1 race, the human race, we are 99.95% genetically similar, amongst human ethnic groups

Hang on, now Im confused, human ethnic groups? So these groups could the basis for differentiation then, or not? Which is it? Is that jews are allowed to differentiate themselves from other ethnic groups but whites are not? How does that work, its all so complicated!


77

Posted by Thorn on Fri, 02 Nov 2012 09:02 | #

h/t Robert Lindsay

Race Does Not Exist


http://robertlindsay.wordpress.com/2010/07/06/race-does-not-exist/

Click to enlarge. Nigerians or Africans (no such thing) in light blue. Europeans or Caucasians (no such thing) in green and red. Asians (no such thing) in purple and blue. The nonexistent entities called Africans, Asians and Europeans are demonstrated in this chart. These constructs do not exist, nor do they differ from each other. That they seem to be plotting quite distinctly on this chart is simply an optical illusion. If you disagree, you are a racist scum and hopefully soon we will even be able to arrest you.

—-

As you can see from this chart made by some racist mad scientist, race is clearly a social construct. His research violated the new Law of Political Correctness, and agents are shutting down his lab as I write this.

Race is clearly a social construct. But it’s a social construct with some powerful attributes. There have been wild and violent wars and battles between various social constructs around the world. These are termed social construct conflicts, social construct wars and social construct violence. The old terms ethnic conflict, ethnic warfare and ethnic violence are no longer acceptable and use of them is de facto evidence of racism. Use of those terms is considered such strong evidence of racism that it is even admissible in a court of Race Law.

Occasionally US cities erupt with what are called social construct riots, in which various social constructs try to destroy and burn down their cities for unknown reasons. Research into these riots has been banned because the social constructs involved were undefinable and do not even in fact exist. Recently there was the Rodney King Social Construct Riot. Before that, there were the Watts Social Construct Riots of 1965 and other famous Social Construct Riots in Detroit, Newark and other places.

These riots can be violent. Sometimes persons of one social construct will even attack persons of another social construct during these riots. How they know how or even why to attack someone of another construct is unknown, because there is no way to determine anyone’s particular construct, since the whole concept is all imaginary anyway.

 


78

Posted by daniels on Fri, 02 Nov 2012 10:17 | #

...........

Thorn,

You are doing the Jews work for them when you jam the word “social construct” as if it is an idealist concept and that race and other things are MERE social constructs.

They are happy for the notion to be flouted because it takes agency and accountability away from us. That is how they want it understood - as a farce.

They want people to continue to understand it in the Cartesian sense in which you apply it and not in the anti-Cartesian, realist sense in which it was conceived. Vico, a Catholic monk, was developing thoughts on its line as a remedy to Cartesianism.

Social constructionism, properly understood is realist, not idealist: The European race would be a real co-construction through our evolution, which we are jointly (as in, partly) responsible for creating and for maintaining.

People who mock the notion generally feel obligated to put the word “mere” before social construct, as in race is a “mere” social construct, for a reason - because that is the sense in which it would be absurd, indeed.

You may say that the notion becomes absurd anyway when you begin to consider say, Australopithecine socially constructing their race. But it is not really absurd, in two or more senses. First, they were probably exercising some choice and social negotiation in mating. Secondly we are negotiating a choice in how those Australopithecine count from our contemporary perspective. We can take that understanding as far back in evolution as possible. Living organisms never lived in isolation and we are, at a minimum, using socially negotiated judgments as to how the product of this evolution counts (and if we are not here to make those judgments and talk about them, what does it matter?). Just as we are saying that the very real 41,000 years of European evolution counts more than anything for us, even though we could, potentially, take our evolution and construct it in another direction - e.g., mulatto. We, as socially constructing the European race, are not bound to have it just merely be subject to forces, impacts or Jews. We have agency and are accountable for its maintenance and defense.

They want to say that our people, our race, is a mere and an ideal construct; then they can apply whatever unimportant or evil attributes they can to us - providing pseudo justifications for genocide even. But it is for us to assert the truth, that we, our race are not mere social construct, we are a real social construct and the most important thing in the world.

I have used this example before: the opposite view from social constructionism would hold that non-White migration into White lands is a force of nature, that its flows are a product of chance. A social constructionist view would hold that these migrations are a result of social negotiation - we would say mis-negotiation - and that there IS accountability for where the problem comes from and we DO have the agency to reverse it.


79

Posted by Thorn on Fri, 02 Nov 2012 13:04 | #

You are doing the Jews work for them when you jam the word “social construct” as if it is an idealist concept and that race and other things are MERE social constructs.

Daniels,

Me thinks you’re reading too much into a simple (yet brilliant) satirical piece.

All Robert Lindsay did was to illustrate how absurd “race is a social construct” canard by being absurd himself.  Or as El Rushbo what say: “Illustrating the absurd with absurdity.”

And you think I’m doing the Jews work?

Laughable.

First of all, I no longer buy into the Jews are doing it to us (some are, some aren’t). I beleive the Left/liberals are doing it to us - and of course the leftists/liberlas come in all ethnicities and religions… including atheists.. Besides, their are too many Jews that absolutely detest the agenda of radical liberals. The late Andrew Breitbart comes to mind. A real intrepid tireless warrior who fought against the cultural Marxists tooth and nail right up until his last breath. There are many Jews that not only despise the Left in general, but, moreover, they absolutely despise evil leftist Jews too! They are wise enough to know its the leftist Jews that regenerate anti-Semitism. Talk show host Michael Savage alludes to it on a regular basis.

Back to Breitbart. A true right-wing warrior/general that is sorely missed in the war against the Cultural Marxists. He had the balls to get right up in the leftist freaks’ grills.

HEH! Check him out in action:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ILZQSmE5Uu0

Typical Breitbart. Ya gotta love him!

 


80

Posted by daniels. on Fri, 02 Nov 2012 13:54 | #

..\
All Robert Lindsay did was to illustrate how absurd “race is a social construct” canard by being absurd himself.

I understand what he is trying to do, but he is doing a disservice by distracting from the important reasons and uses of social constructionism, by not noting important distinctions as I have indicated.


All Robert Lindsay did was to illustrate how absurd “race is a social construct” canard by being absurd himself

I tried to explain how it is not absurd when understood properly as realist. If it is construed as a mere social construct, as Jewish Marxist and liberal academics are wont to do, then it is absurd.


And you think I’m doing the Jews work?

Laughable.


Well, I have observed that Jewish academics distort and pervert concepts which are in fact good and started out well conceived. Social construtionism is one of them. Lindsay’s joke is serving their interests by making a very good and important concept seem completely absurd.


First of all, I no longer buy into the Jews are doing it to us (some are, some aren’t).

They certainly are not our only problem: traitors high and low, operating on obsolete notions of different kinds are among our greatest difficulties. Of course there are other groups besides Jews who are problematic as well.

However, in distinct pattern, Jewish elites are not doing us any favors in the realm of: Banking, Media, Academics, Law/Courts, Politics, Religion. The evidence is overwhelming.


I beleive the Left/liberals are doing it to us - and of course the leftists/liberlas come in all ethnicities and religions…

Where does that culture of left/liberalism come from? Is Kevin MacDonald an idiot?

I have been quick to note other problems, more of our making, but I have the sense that it will be futile to broach here.


There are many Jews that not only despise the Left in general, but, moreover, they absolutely despise evil leftist Jews too!

There are Jews who are not so bad, just as there are Blacks that are not so bad. The pattern is the issue - how it affects us. Jews are basically a race that care very much about themselves and not about Whites. That is all the more true among their most powerful decision makers.

As for those who despise “The Left”, Jewish Capitalists and Jewish Liberals are every bit as problematic as Jewish Leftists, cultural Marxists. Just ask Bernake and co. about his bail-out.

There are many Jews that not only despise the Left in general, but, moreover, they absolutely despise evil leftist Jews too! Talk show host Michael Savage alludes to it on a regular basis.

They are “wise” enough to know that they better allow for some steam letting, diversion and controlled opposition.

Back to Breitbart. A true right-wing warrior/general that is sorely missed in the war against the Cultural Marxists. He had the balls to get right up in the leftist freaks’ grills.

Not familiar with him, but you must understand that Jewish interests play both sides. They can make very clever arguments against either side.

Nevertheless, when our side pursues a “rightist” agenda, we are easy prey for them because we are not organized as a union - a union of Whites.

Unlike Jewish leftism, White leftism is a whole different matter - it functions as a union for Whites (i.e. native Europeans as a class with subclasses) only and allows for: private property, free enterprise, wealth, different individual and community ways, provided they are accountable to and do not rupture the union of Whites and their sub-nations.


Some may think this is not organic, that it is exogenous, but not true. On the contrary, we must start from the inside-out.


81

Posted by Thorn on Fri, 02 Nov 2012 14:57 | #

Where does that culture of left/liberalism come from? Is Kevin MacDonald an idiot?

No. K-Mac does a masterful job of painting a part of the picture. However he only painted part of the picture, albeit a significant part. Viewing the whole picture give us the proper perspective.

It’s often said “the definition of insanity is to do the same thing over and over and expect different results?”

I think it more defines stupidity than insanity, but that’s just me. Anyway, I say that to say this: Too many “WNs” make the mistake of blaming “the Jews” for own current predicament. “The Jews are behind it all! they assert! When the average Joe or Jill hears someone spouting such statements, they immediately make a value judgement about that person; and beleive me, it ain’t a good one. It’s a universal given that you cannot condemn a whole group of people for the actions of some within that group. If you do so, then prepare to be roundly rejected. Another example is Catholics. I absolutely despise the actions of some liberal Catholics (and we all know there are legions of liberal Catholics.) However nobody in their right mind would condemn ALL Catholics as enemies of Whites on account of the nauseating lib Catholics.

But WNs continue to make such mistakes. Thus the WN movement continues to be refudiated (a little Sarah Palin ling there, heh!) by the masses. So the question is: Do WNs continues to do the same thing and expect different results? or should we try a different approach? I say the latter.

I found this over at The Mad Jewess’ blog. It illustrates just how easy it is to make fun of people whom are openly anti-Semitic thus delegitimize us.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vre8naPjdn8


82

Posted by Leon Haller on Fri, 02 Nov 2012 15:53 | #

The trick, gents, is gradual radicalization, as I keep saying to no avail. Start with making ending the immigration invasion the centerpiece of WN. Nothing is more important than terminating this constant increase in our competitors’-cum-enemies’ numbers. This would be a huge victory if achieved (anywhere).

Who says we have to stop with that, however? Once we end the invasion, momentum will be with us, the wind at our backs, and we start then pressing for more serious demands. We keep doing this - upping the ante - until we have truly radicalized the white population in a nationalist direction without their having even known it.

In mature democracies one rarely gets from Point A to Z, or even A to E. It takes a very special set of circumstances (as surrounded the passage of Obamacare). The traitor Bush could have ended immigration, or at least militarized the Mexican border, after 9/11. But to expect to get whites to go from PC Diversity to WN all at once is ludicrous. They need to be husbanded along. The initial starting points are areas where we already have majority agreement, like enforcement of immigration laws wrt illegal aliens, ending affirmative action preferences, and cracking down on (mostly nonwhite) crime.

Once we have mentally toughened up whites by forcing them to take sides, to think about, these kinds of issues, and once we have actually gone through the political firestorm of doing something on them, whites will have become psychologically conditioned to accept greater radicalization. This is called “outflanking the Jews”.


83

Posted by Thorn on Fri, 02 Nov 2012 17:21 | #

Start with making ending the immigration invasion the centerpiece of WN.

You’re absolutely right, Leon.

We already have at least two organizations up and running working on that very issue. One being VDARE.com, The other, a more mainstream org with more lobbying clout is Numbers USA. Numbers USA is to immigration reform as the NRA is to preserving our Second Amendment rights. We MUST support one or the other or both.

On a related issue, the blogger Tanstaafl was asking why whites don’t form an organization whose function is to defend whites and initiates legal action against those who deliberately defame and slander white people. Again one already exists. http://www.resistingdefamation.org/ We need to support them too. The more funds they take in, the more talent they can hire….that means that more legal action can be initiated.

But alas, what we need most is a top notch marketing campaign to make our movement more attractive. Particularly more attractive than the “anti-racist” cretins. But, of course, it takes lots of money to hire the most creative ad agencies. We desperately need the best and brightest creative people to craft messages and slogans that put us in the best light. I’m sorry to offend, but slogans such “anti-racism is code for anti-White” ain’t good enough. It has very little meaning or impact to the hoi polloi.


84

Posted by daniels on Sat, 03 Nov 2012 01:02 | #

........
I believe it is necessary to pursue an organization of radical White separatism first.

My understanding is that in the U.S., anyway, local and popular anti-immigration sentiments have been continually overturned, primarily by Jewish political and legal interests.

The 1965 Immigration Act spear headed by Emanuel Celler is well known.

The manner in which courts, such as the 9th Circuit, simply overturn popular anti-immigration vote as a
choke point of power and enforcement is not quite as well known.

Alex Kozinkski (July 23, 1950) is Chief Judge of the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit


http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Alex_Kozinski


United States v. Ramirez-Lopez (2003)

The majority found the due process rights of a man accused of smuggling illegal immigrants across the border were not violated because witnesses who could have exonerated him were deported before they could be deposed. Despite winning, federal prosecutors, apparently pushed by Kozinski’s dissent, dropped all charges and released the defendant.[14][15] In 2012, after prosecutors used similar tactics in another case, United States v. Leal-Del Carmen, Kosinski’s position in Ramirez-Lopez became the law in the Ninth Circuit.


85

Posted by antifascist on Sat, 03 Nov 2012 03:40 | #

I can easily debunk your anti-jewish hate speech, with this article by Tim Wise, @daniels, you need medication from a psychiatrist for your psychotic mental illness.  Good night white pride!


Article Written by Tim Wise Published on Tolerance.org, 8/19/03


Several years ago, when I began to write essays on racism for a number of internet-based publications, I made the decision to include my e-mail address at the bottom of every article. This, despite my awareness that doing so would prompt any number of cranks to write me, expressing contempt for one or another column I had written. To condemn racism is to encourage the wrath of cyberspace-savvy bigots bent on expressing their nuttiness to any and all who will listen.


To these folks, offering my e-mail address is nothing less than an invitation for them to regale me with age-old racist rants about blacks, and to extol the virtues of so-called white culture and white “genetic purity.” Even more telling, are the things they say after the paragraphs about the greater cranial capacity of Caucasians as compared to Africans, or the inverse relationship between brain size and penis size, with whites leading in the first category and black males in the second. For after all the babble about race is completed, my internet pen pals turn to the real source of their hatred, and offer what they consider the ultimate refutation of anything I have written: namely, I am a Jew (usually a “dirty” one at that, they being quick with the adjectives), and this explains my desire to “destroy the white race.” To this way of thinking, if indeed we can call it that, Jews use multiculturalism, immigration and affirmative action to weaken the strength of whites, thereby increasing our own power. Although most Jews in the U.S. are from Europe, we aren’t white in this worldview, but rather seen as the ultimate social, cultural, and even genetic threat to white survival.

For years I’ve been told to ignore this stuff. “Why respond?” some would ask. “Nothing can change the minds of people this deranged.” But while the last point here may well be true, there are still good reasons to engage the arguments made by professional (or, for that matter, amateur) Jew Haters. Even the most absurd statements can become accepted if they go unrefuted by persons more concerned about remaining above the fray, than challenging stupidity from the outset. The belief that the Holocaust of European Jewry never happened, for example, which would have been considered evidence of cerebral damage a few decades ago, is now widespread throughout parts of Europe. Likewise, beliefs that Jews control the media and economy are increasingly heard on the internet and elsewhere.
So let us now dispense with the nonsense about Jewish power. For while the claim by some in the Jewish community that we are still perpetual victims of gentile persecution is also foolishly overstated, the opposite idea — that we run everything as evidenced by our “disproportionate overrepresentation” in media and finance — is nothing short of insane, even based on the “evidence” for such a claim marshaled by those who believe it.


For example, the founders of the website, Hoozajew.org (who claim their goal is to confront Jewish power and destructive influences), say they have developed a database program that can determine how many Jews are in a given organization by analyzing the names of people in the group. Putting aside the absurdity of trying to determine religious or ethnic heritage solely from a list of names, when this “program” is used to analyze key figures at three of the top media companies in the U.S., the number of Jews among top executives, directors and management totals eight out of eighty-eight: about nine percent. Though this is higher than the three percent of Americans who are Jewish, it is not such a disproportion as to indicate Jewish “control” of the media.


What’s more, the apparent disproportion is rooted more in statistical sampling error than anything else. For example, at AOL TimeWarner there are twenty-four key executives, so even though only five are Jewish, five as a share of twenty-four is 21 percent, giving the impression of a huge disproportion of Jews; likewise, Gannett, where only three of thirty-four board members or top management are Jewish, according to Hoozajew.org, but where this represents a seemingly disproportionate nine percent of the total. Because of low sample sizes, virtually any Jewish representation will appear disproportionate in a statistical sense. Imagine a company with fifteen executives. If even one of those is Jewish, the Jewish “representation” would be nearly seven percent–more than twice the share of Jews as in the population at large. But to think that one out of fifteen individuals somehow indicates Jewish domination of that company would be the very definition of lunacy.


Of course, even if there are many Jews in a given industry, this can only be problematic for one of two reasons: first, if one already believes Jews are inherently given to abusing power; or secondly, if Jews obtained their positions by way of injustice, having received unfair privileges relative to non-Jews. To accept the first of these is to engage in the ultimate circular logic: We know the Jews are bad because they “control the media,” and they control the media because they are bad. As regards the second possibility, while it is true that Jews in the U.S. have benefited from having mostly “white” skin, and thus, have been able to move ahead of persons of color in many industries thanks to white privilege, there is no evidence that Jews obtained positions in media or elsewhere because of state intervention on their behalf as Jews, over and above the opportunities provided for non-Jews.


Looking at claims of Jewish media domination, bigots imply that Jews have evil intentions to manipulate information for the sake of “Jewish” interests. Yet, there are many logical reasons for the significant Jewish media presence. Most importantly, media outlets (as with financial institutions) have always been concentrated in urban areas, and especially New York City. Likewise, Jews in America have mostly been an urban people, with a large share of the Jewish community residing in New York. As such, the proper way to evaluate the extent of Jewish “overrepresentation” is not to compare the percentage of Jews in a given company or industry with the overall Jewish population, but rather, to compare the Jewish level of representation with the Jewish share of the population in places like New York. In other words, in social science terms, one must control for geographic concentration of certain industries, in order to determine what the expected level of Jewish representation in finance or media would otherwise be.


According to the American Jewish Committee, there are 1.45 million Jews in New York City, and according to the Census Bureau, there are roughly eight million people living in New York City overall. Thus, Jews would comprise approximately 18 percent of the population of New York: six times greater than the national average. Other estimates place the Jewish share of the New York population at around ten percent, still more than three times the national average. Thus, the “overrepresentation” of Jews in various companies or industries is no overrepresentation at all, and occasionally an underrepresentation.
As for the banking and financial industries, even based on the analysis of “Jewish names” by Hoozajew.org, (which, it should be noted is one of the more “sophisticated” chroniclers of so-called Jewish power), fewer than six percent of the directors and officers of seven of the largest banks or brokerage firms in the country are Jewish. Even this number is a bit deceptive and largely the result of sampling size. With only 255 directors and officers at these seven institutions combined, even a small number of Jews — in this case fifteen — adds up to almost six percent, which again seems “disproportionate” to the share of Jews in the U.S., but which can hardly be seen as meaningful given the small number of persons involved. And of course, since the share of the population that is Jewish in New York, where these entities are located, is much larger, this percentage is actually an underrepresentation compared to the numbers of Jews in the area.


At Morgan Stanley, nine percent of directors and officers are identified by Hoozajew.org as Jewish, and this, according to the website, indicates a “very important over-representation” of Jews. But nine percent of directors and officers at Morgan Stanley represents a whopping two people, because there are only twenty-three such officers at the firm. Likewise, at Citibank, the presence of five Jewish persons among the company’s directors and officers ends up totaling nine percent of such officers, because there are only fifty-nine such persons in all. But it is laughable to suggest that these five control the institution against the wishes of the other fifty-four.


In the section of the Hoozajew website entitled, “Jews on Wall Street,” the site director notes that for the New York Stock Exchange there are thirty-two members of the Board of Directors. Hoozajew.org seems to think it’s important that thirteen percent of these are Jewish. But thirteen percent of thirty-two people is only four people: hardly enough to indicate Jewish domination of the NYSE.


Of course, in keeping with the logic of anti-Jewish bigots, perhaps one should ask the following: If media or financial wrongdoing is Jewish inspired, since Jews are prominent in media and finance, should the depredations of white Christian-dominated industries (like the tobacco or automobile industries) be viewed as examples of white Christian malfeasance? After all, 400,000 people per year die because of smoking-related illnesses, and tobacco companies withheld information on the cancerous properties of their products. Likewise, should executives at Ford and Firestone be thought of as specifically white Christian criminals, due to recent disclosures that defective tires were installed on SUV’s, resulting in the deaths of over 150 people worldwide? Is their race, religion or ethnic culture relevant to their misdeeds? If not, why is it suddenly relevant when the executives in question are Jewish?


That nothing I have said here will matter to those whose vitriol regularly fills my inbox is testimony to nothing so much as their deep psychological need to project their own authoritarian tendencies onto others. To find Jewish scapegoats for whatever miserable failures their lives have turned out to be, is the ideological holy grail of the anti-Jewish bigot. And of course it will lead them to view this column as merely more proof that a Jewish conspiracy exists, and that I am part of it: my denials only prove my guilt, in the warped worldview of persons so hate-besotted.


So be it. But at least the introduction of facts into a debate otherwise top-heavy with innuendo and paranoid ranting can perhaps inoculate some against the spread of the virus of anti-Jewish bigotry. At the very least, we can now rest assured in the knowledge that just as Nazis have never been very good with history, they are equally bad at understanding things like statistical probability and even the most rudimentary strictures of reason.


86

Posted by Bill on Sat, 03 Nov 2012 04:19 | #

There’s a thread at the Telegraph (3/11/2012) which amply demonstrates evidence of what this thread is all about.  A Seemingly mundane run of the mill article for such a claim, but a major plank none- the- less.

Here’s just one more strand as to how it is being accomplished.

The global war on free speech

As usual the comments are most enlightening, more-so than the article itself.

http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/uknews/leveson-inquiry/9648522/The-global-war-on-free-speech.html

Here’s another one,  same newspaper. 31/10/2012.  Goes right to the heart of the matter.

NHS millions for controversial care pathway
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/health/healthnews/9644287/NHS-millions-for-controversial-care-pathway.html

The bait is liberalism, the reality is…..


87

Posted by daniels. on Sat, 03 Nov 2012 04:32 | #

Posted by antifascist on November 03, 2012, 03:40 AM | #

I can easily debunk your anti-jewish hate speech, with this article by Tim Wise, @daniels, you need medication from a psychiatrist for your psychotic mental illness.  Good night white pride!

You don’t seem to understand scumbag spammer: we do not want anything from you. We want to be separate from you.

You are quoting from “tick tock tick tock” Tim Wise? We know better. Good night scumbag who would genocide my people.


88

Posted by antifascist on Sat, 03 Nov 2012 04:40 | #

@Bill, yes liberalism is a decadence and vicious economic system, that relies on the exploitation of the working class. The answer to the criminal, liberal, corrupt economic and political system, is International Communism.  Here is a segment of Engels’ Thesis.

Fredrick Engels
The Principles of Communism
Written: October-November 1847
Source: Selected Works, Volume One, p. 81-97
Publisher: Progress Publishers, Moscow, 1969
First Published: 1914, Eduard Bernstein in Vörwarts! (Central organ of the German Social Democratic Party)
Translated: Paul Sweezy
Online Version: MEA 1993; marxists.org 1999
Transcribed: Zodiac
HTML Markup: Brian Basgen
Document Introduction


- 1-
What is Communism?
Communism is the doctrine of the conditions of the liberation of the proletariat.


- 2-
What is the proletariat?
The proletariat is that class in society which lives entirely from the sale of its labor and does not draw profit from any kind of capital; whose weal and woe, whose life and death, whose sole existence depends on the demand for labor—hence, on the changing state of business, on the vagaries of unbridled competition. The proletariat, or the class of proletarians, is, in a word, the working class of the 19th century.[1]


- 3-
Proletarians, then, have not always existed?

No. There have always been poor and working classes; and the working class have mostly been poor. But there have not always been workers and poor people living under conditions as they are today; in other words, there have not always been proletarians, any more than there has always been free unbridled competitions.


- 4-
How did the proletariat originate?
The Proletariat originated in the industrial revolution, which took place in England in the last half of the last (18th) century, and which has since then been repeated in all the civilized countries of the world.
This industrial revolution was precipitated by the discovery of the steam engine, various spinning machines, the mechanical loom, and a whole series of other mechanical devices. These machines, which were very expensive and hence could be bought only by big capitalists, altered the whole mode of production and displaced the former workers, because the machines turned out cheaper and better commodities than the workers could produce with their inefficient spinning wheels and handlooms. The machines delivered industry wholly into the hands of the big capitalists and rendered entirely worthless the meagre property of the workers (tools, looms, etc.). The result was that the capitalists soon had everything in their hands and nothing remained to the workers. This marked the introduction of the factory system into the textile industry.


These are:
(i) The class of big capitalists, who, in all civilized countries, are already in almost exclusive possession of all the means of subsistance and of the instruments (machines, factories) and materials necessary for the production of the means of subsistence. This is the bourgeois class, or the bourgeoisie.
(ii) The class of the wholly propertyless, who are obliged to sell their labor to the bourgeoisie in order to get, in exchange, the means of subsistence for their support. This is called the class of proletarians, or the proletariat.


- 5-
Under what conditions does this sale of the labor of the proletarians to the bourgeoisie take place?
Labor is a commodity, like any other, and its price is therefore determined by exactly the same laws that apply to other commodities. In a regime of big industry or of free competition—as we shall see, the two come to the same thing—the price of a commodity is, on the average, always equal to its cost of production. Hence, the price of labor is also equal to the cost of production of labor.


- 7-
In what way do proletarians differ from slaves?
The slave is sold once and for all; the proletarian must sell himself daily and hourly.
The individual slave, property of one master, is assured an existence, however miserable it may be, because of the master’s interest. The individual proletarian, property as it were of the entire bourgeois class which buys his labor only when someone has need of it, has no secure existence. This existence is assured only to the class as a whole.


The slave is outside competition; the proletarian is in it and experiences all its vagaries.
The slave counts as a thing, not as a member of society. Thus, the slave can have a better existence than the proletarian, while the proletarian belongs to a higher stage of social development and, himself, stands on a higher social level than the slave.

The slave frees himself when, of all the relations of private property, he abolishes only the relation of slavery and thereby becomes a proletarian; the proletarian can free himself only by abolishing private property in general.


- 8-
In what way do proletarians differ from serfs?
The serf possesses and uses an instrument of production, a piece of land, in exchange for which he gives up a part of his product or part of the services of his labor.
The proletarian works with the instruments of production of another, for the account of this other, in exchange for a part of the product.


The serf gives up, the proletarian receives. The serf has an assured existence, the proletarian has not. The serf is outside competition, the proletarian is in it.
The serf liberates himself in one of three ways: either he runs away to the city and there becomes a handicraftsman; or, instead of products and and services, he gives money to his lord and thereby becomes a free tenant; or he overthrows his feudal lord and himself becomes a property owner. In short, by one route or another, he gets into the owning class and enters into competition. The proletarian liberates himself by abolishing competition, private property, and all class differences.

 


- 11 -
What were the immediate consequences of the industrial revolution and of the division of society into bourgeoisie and proletariat?

First, the lower and lower prices of industrial products brought about by machine labor totally destroyed, in all countries of the world, the old system of manufacture or industry based upon hand labor.
In this way, all semi-barbarian countries, which had hitherto been more or less strangers to historical development, and whose industry had been based on manufacture, were violently forced out of their isolation. They bought the cheaper commodities of the English and allowed their own manufacturing workers to be ruined. Countries which had known no progress for thousands of years—for example, India—were thoroughly revolutionized, and even China is now on the way to a revolution.
We have come to the point where a new machine invented in England deprives millions of Chinese workers of their livelihood within a year’s time.


In this way, big industry has brought all the people of the Earth into contact with each other, has merged all local markets into one world market, has spread civilization and progress everywhere and has thus ensured that whatever happens in civilized countries will have repercussions in all other countries.
It follows that if the workers in England or France now liberate themselves, this must set off revolution in all other countries—revolutions which, sooner or later, must accomplish the liberation of their respective working class.
Second, wherever big industries displaced manufacture, the bourgeoisie developed in wealth and power to the utmost and made itself the first class of the country. The result was that wherever this happened, the bourgeoisie took political power into its own hands and displaced the hitherto ruling classes, the aristocracy, the guildmasters, and their representative, the absolute monarchy.


The bourgeoisie annihilated the power of the aristocracy, the nobility, by abolishing the entailment of estates—in other words, by making landed property subject to purchase and sale, and by doing away with the special privileges of the nobility. It destroyed the power of the guildmasters by abolishing guilds and handicraft privileges. In their place, it put competition—that is, a state of society in which everyone has the right to enter into any branch of industry, the only obstacle being a lack of the necessary capital.
The introduction of free competition is thus public declaration that from now on the members of society are unequal only to the extent that their capitals are unequal, that capital is the decisive power, and that therefore the capitalists, the bourgeoisie, have become the first class in society.
Free competition is necessary for the establishment of big industry, because it is the only condition of society in which big industry can make its way.
Having destroyed the social power of the nobility and the guildmasters, the bourgeois also destroyed their political power. Having raised itself to the actual position of first


class in society, it proclaims itself to be also the dominant political class. This it does through the introduction of the representative system which rests on bourgeois equality before the law and the recognition of free competition, and in European countries takes the form of constitutional monarchy. In these constitutional monarchies, only those who possess a certain capital are voters—that is to say, only members of the bourgeoisie. These bourgeois voters choose the deputies, and these bourgeois deputies, by using their right to refuse to vote taxes, choose a bourgeois government.
Third, everywhere the proletariat develops in step with the bourgeoisie. In proportion, as the bourgeoisie grows in wealth, the proletariat grows in numbers. For, since the proletarians can be employed only by capital, and since capital extends only through employing labor, it follows that the growth of the proletariat proceeds at precisely the same pace as the growth of capital.

Simultaneously, this process draws members of the bourgeoisie and proletarians together into the great cities where industry can be carried on most profitably, and by thus throwing great masses in one spot it gives to the proletarians a consciousness of their own strength.


Moreover, the further this process advances, the more new labor-saving machines are invented, the greater is the pressure exercised by big industry on wages, which, as we have seen, sink to their minimum and therewith render the condition of the proletariat increasingly unbearable. The growing dissatisfaction of the proletariat thus joins with its rising power to prepare a proletarian social revolution.

 

- 18 -
What will be the course of this revolution?
Above all, it will establish a democratic constitution, and through this, the direct or indirect dominance of the proletariat. Direct in England, where the proletarians are already a majority of the people. Indirect in France and Germany, where the majority of the people consists not only of proletarians, but also of small peasants and petty bourgeois who are in the process of falling into the proletariat, who are more and more dependent in all their political interests on the proletariat, and who must, therefore, soon adapt to the demands of the proletariat. Perhaps this will cost a second struggle, but the outcome can only be the victory of the proletariat.


Democracy would be wholly valueless to the proletariat if it were not immediately used as a means for putting through measures directed against private property and ensuring the livelihood of the proletariat. The main measures, emerging as the necessary result of existing relations, are the following:


(i) Limitation of private property through progressive taxation, heavy inheritance taxes, abolition of inheritance through collateral lines (brothers, nephews, etc.) forced loans, etc.
(ii) Gradual expropriation of landowners, industrialists, railroad magnates and shipowners, partly through competition by state industry, partly directly through compensation in the form of bonds.
(iii) Confiscation of the possessions of all emigrants and rebels against the majority of the people.
(iv) Organization of labor or employment of proletarians on publicly owned land, in factories and workshops, with competition among the workers being abolished and with the factory owners, in so far as they still exist, being obliged to pay the same high wages as those paid by the state.
(v) An equal obligation on all members of society to work until such time as private
property has been completely abolished. Formation of industrial armies, especially for agriculture.
(vi) Centralization of money and credit in the hands of the state through a national bank with state capital, and the suppression of all private banks and bankers.
(vii) Education of the number of national factories, workshops, railroads, ships; bringing new lands into cultivation and improvement of land already under cultivation—all in proportion to the growth of the capital and labor force at the disposal of the nation.
(viii) Education of all children, from the moment they can leave their mother’s care, in national establishments at national cost. Education and production together.
(ix) Construction, on public lands, of great palaces as communal dwellings for associated groups of citizens engaged in both industry and agriculture and combining in their way of life the advantages of urban and rural conditions while avoiding the one-sidedness and drawbacks of each.
(x) Destruction of all unhealthy and jerry-built dwellings in urban districts. (xi) Equal inheritance rights for children born in and out of wedlock.
(xii) Concentration of all means of transportation in the hands of the nation.

It is impossible, of course, to carry out all these measures at once. But one will always bring others in its wake. Once the first radical attack on private property has been launched, the proletariat will find itself forced to go ever further, to concentrate increasingly in the hands of the state all capital, all agriculture, all transport, all trade. All the foregoing measures are directed to this end; and they will become practicable and feasible, capable of producing their centralizing effects to precisely the degree that the proletariat, through its labor, multiplies the country’s productive forces.

Finally, when all capital, all production, all exchange have been brought together in the hands of the nation, private property will disappear of its own accord, money will become superfluous, and production will so expand and man so change that society will be able to slough off whatever of its old economic habits may remain.


Footnotes
The following footnotes are from the Chinese Edition of Marx/Engels Selected Works
Peking, Foreign Languages Press, 1977.
with editorial additions by marxists.org


89

Posted by daniels. on Sat, 03 Nov 2012 04:45 | #

You don’t seem to understand scumbag spammer:

We do not want your labor.

We do not want anything from you. We want to be separate from you.

Good night scumbag who would genocide my people.


90

Posted by antifascist on Sat, 03 Nov 2012 04:46 | #

@Daniels If you want to refute me, Cite your scholarly sources, references, and footnotes, in an appropriate manner. Don’t just hurl juvenile, schoolyard insults, you nazi white supremacist.

Prove to me, that this ” white genocide” is real, via scholarly references, from reputable academics, and professors. Or cease to insult my superior intellect, with your average joe nazi, unscholarly anti-jewish rhetoric.


91

Posted by daniels. on Sat, 03 Nov 2012 05:12 | #

//////
Posted by antifascist on November 03, 2012, 04:46 AM | #

@Daniels If you want to refute me, Cite your scholarly sources, references, and footnotes, in an appropriate manner.

I don’t owe you an explanation dirt bag. There is an abundance of proof. Go look it up yourself.



Don’t just hurl juvenile, schoolyard insults, you nazi white supremacist.


LOL, haven’t you just contradicted yourself in one sentence, retard? And you wonder why I do not see you as worth talking to?


Prove to me, that this ” white genocide” is real, via scholarly references, from reputable academics, and professors.

I don’t owe you an explanation for defending my people and for wanting to live separately from you and other non-Whites, slime ball.

You want some data? Here you go fat lips:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_sovereign_states_and_dependent_territories_by_birth_rate


If you like Africans go and live with them, they are plentiful and breeding exponentially: something like 44 out of the first 51 countries in per capita birthrate are Black African.

Or cease to insult my superior intellect, with your average joe nazi, unscholarly anti-jewish rhetoric.

Stick a banana in your mouth, monkey.

There is nothing that we need from you. That is all you need to know.


92

Posted by Thorn on Sat, 03 Nov 2012 08:05 | #

From the piece Bill linked to @ 86

Everywhere around the world, it seems, the right to take offence has been elevated into a human right. Usually, but not always, this “right” is exercised through religious belief. Most cases are seen through the prism of “insults” to Islam. But this “right” now seems to be exercised by whoever wants it.

Bringing the “right to take offence” theme down to the street level, Velociworld has some very pertinent observations:

The N Word and The M Word

I’ve always found it jocose when blacks feign faux outrage over the use of the N Word. It is identical to the faux outrage Muslims pretend to when Mohammed is somehow blasphemed in a cartoon. They are identical examples of piss ant bullying against White Western Guilt.

I sat next to a shamming young black man at a lengthy red light the other day who was blaring a rap screed whose only lyrics were apparently “Buck Ni***r. It seemed to be a paean to his self-identification as such.

That word doesn’t bother black people. They are running the world’s greatest con by pretending it does. They want this: something they can do that a white person cannot. Plain and simple. You been gamed, cracker.

Likewise, Muslims blaspheme Mohammed all the time. Most of the the victims of their bloodlust are fellow Muslims. Cartoon, videos, Satanic Verses, they’re all bullshit. Drawing a picture of Mohammed doesn’t bother Muslims. They are running the world’s second greatest con by pretending it does. You been gamed, cracker.

I don’t use the N Word because 1) I have my own small vulgarisms I am more comfortable with, and 2) I don’t want my house burned down. The same reason I don’t publish cartoons of Mohammed fucking a raccoon.

We all, I think, strive for decency with our fellow man. No one I know would intentionally insult another human being. But do not think you are not being gamed, sapsucker. Your pigtails are in the inkwell. When words, letters, pictures, even, are verboten, we are fucking Eloi.

If you don’t know who the mark is, you’re probably the mark.


93

Posted by Leon Haller on Sat, 03 Nov 2012 16:00 | #

Thorn@83

Yes, I have donated to NumbersUSA, and I am a member of the NRA. I don’t know exactly what the answer is to how to spread our message most effectively. Basically, everything helps, meaning if more whites were interested in their own racial perpetuity, we could win this - though if more whites had a natural sense of racial honor and concern, we wouldn’t be in this mess in the first place! That’s the WN paradox, as well as the ultimate basis for “White Zion”. Most whites just don’t care enough about the preservation of nation, civilization, and race, and thus (real, ethnonational) patriots end up being political minorities everywhere, even though, if we from all the white territories ingathered to a single sovereign polity, we would constitute a sizable as well as powerful nation. And in the age of the internet, global telecommunications, and cheap airline travel, WZ is less of an uprooting than any previous mass migration. But I guess people are driven by desperation, and things just aren’t bad enough yet. (Plus, there is no WZ movement; it’s jus an idea).

One thing about strategy that I do understand is that trying to persuade large numbers of people through full and immediate presentation of racial truth is a surefire loser (especially when some of that “truth” is either morally repugnant or factually problematic). People psychologically are conditioned by their environments. I would imagine WNs in general (beyond simple racists) are more intelligent - not necessarily cognitively, though probably that, too, to some extent, but in terms of being able to perceive reality more clearly (at least as it impinges on race) - than the general white population. We are obviously more naturally insulated from brainwashing. But there’s no use whining; we have to work with the materials at hand.

To save the white race, what we really need is a kind of mass-membership racial conservative (not nationalist) movement. Look at the Jews (or racial minorities). They have hundreds or thousands of US organizations dedicated to “advancing Jewish interests”. All are ethnocultural or nationalist - but only a few are real ‘hate groups’. I would argue that whites actually have more racist hate groups than they do positive, ethnocultural activist ones dedicated to “advancing the interests of the white community”. I think this is the key (bridge) to our Cause’s growth. What we need is American Nationalism, not White Nationalism. Much of the pragmatic policy agenda is the same, but the underlying ideology is much more palatable to whites - nonwhites, Jews and race traitors would still denounce and attack us, but they hate us anyway. Our task is to appeal to white conservatives who could be made to understand our racial problems, but who will not endorse (at least initially) white racism. That is the real political ‘space’ that needs to be usefully filled now (even if the ultimate goal is the White Republic, whether secessionist or White Zionist).


94

Posted by antifascist on Sun, 04 Nov 2012 02:08 | #

@Daniels

If you like Africans go and live with them, they are plentiful and breeding exponentially: something like 44 out of the first 51 countries in per capita birthrate are Black African.

Stick a banana in your mouth, monkey.

There is nothing that we need from you. That is all you need to know.

<u>
These comments by Daniels, are all disgusting racial slurs, that promote racial vilification, and incite violence, based on skin color. You should be prosecuted in your country under hate speech laws, for racial vilification, you insult monkeys, and all members of the one and only human race. </u>

We are all members of the one and only human race, this brilliant communist song’s lyrics, should educate you to this fact.


The Internationale: Lyrics,


Arise ye workers [starvelings] from your slumbers
Arise ye prisoners of want
For reason in revolt now thunders
And at last ends the age of cant.
Away with all your superstitions
Servile masses arise, arise
We’ll change henceforth [forthwith] the old tradition [conditions]
And spurn the dust to win the prize.

So comrades, come rally
And the last fight let us face
The Internationale unites the human race.
So comrades, come rally
And the last fight let us face
The Internationale unites the human race.

No more deluded by reaction
On tyrants only we’ll make war
The soldiers too will take strike action
They’ll break ranks and fight no more
And if those cannibals keep trying
To sacrifice us to their pride
They soon shall hear the bullets flying
We’ll shoot the generals on our own side.

No saviour from on high delivers
No faith have we in prince or peer
Our own right hand the chains must shiver
Chains of hatred, greed and fear
E’er the thieves will out with their booty [give up their booty]
And give to all a happier lot.
Each [those] at the forge must do their duty
And we’ll strike while the iron is hot.


95

Posted by Silver on Sun, 04 Nov 2012 02:26 | #

Leon,

    We gotta be out there, folks, hitting the enemy again and again ... fine arguments for intellectuals are important, but perhaps repetitive sloganeering may ultimately prove more effective?

What?  That’s ridiculous. God you are dumb, Haller. As if advertising works!  Everyone knows that people only buy BMWs after lengthy hours spent poring over engineering reports and statistics, eventually tentatively concluding that, yes, a BWM does appear to represent the pinnacle of motor vehicle craftsmanship. 

daniels,

Your problem is you possess abundant racial passion but lack racial prowess. You would think that after all the energy you’ve poured into penning those rambling race essays you might have learned a thing or two about the optimal responses to standard anti-racist attacks.  But noooooo.  What a cinch you make it for antis to feel morally justified.

 

 


96

Posted by Silver on Sun, 04 Nov 2012 02:59 | #

Mick,

A phrase like “eliding our existence” may well not even register.

Perhaps a little bit of tabloid terror is needed, “buried beneath the patio of history” or something like that.

That’s all well and good (and undeniably true), but unfortunately, in the hands of the highly motivated racial activist, by appearing to urge action, it still tends to have the effect of making you sound unreasonable.  Most people hear that and tell themselves they “know where all this is going.”  In their minds it’s just another part of your endless campaign to slip racism under the radar, to sugarcoat what you’re all about. That’s certainly not to say they necessarily like what’s going on, but I think experience bears me out that if people perceive an objective as not easily achievable they consider it all but unachievable and urging them to attempt it (particularly while ignoring their concerns about it) has the effect of annoying them more than inspiring them. 

Compare the urge to action to simply securing rejection of the anti-white paradigm.  The latter doesn’t require people to do anything.  In sharp contrast to urging action, it’s very easy to say yes to and very difficult to say no to.  And very importantly, people who reject the anti-white paradigm tend to cease resisting “the racists”—even if they remain convinced that many racists “go to far,” and are put off by this, it’s no longer the deal-breaker it once was.

Now, I’m sure you’re not in the least bit interested in any advice I may have to offer (and what a coup on my part if, as many contend, I am “the enemy” and my advice happens to be sound) but I think it’s worth pondering (go on, be a devil).


97

Posted by uKn_Leo on Sun, 04 Nov 2012 03:22 | #

So how’s that communism working out for you around the world so far antifascist?


‘No more deluded by reaction

On tyrants only we’ll make war’


Lenin.

Stalin.

Mao.

Castro.

Jung IL.

etc etc etc


Count me out bro. Perverted anti-human Jewish sourced political ideology doesn’t do it for me.

Have you heard of the expression ‘useful idiot’, perchance?


98

Posted by daniels. on Sun, 04 Nov 2012 03:34 | #

..
/.

These comments by Daniels, are all disgusting racial slurs, that promote racial vilification, and incite violence, based on skin color. You should be prosecuted in your country under hate speech laws, for racial vilification, you insult monkeys, and all members of the one and only human race.

We are all members of the one and only human race, this brilliant communist song’s lyrics, should educate you to this fact.

We evolved from ape-like creatures such as yourself, but that does not mean that our vastly different species can survive imposed interaction - which you are indeed, trying to force. We want and need to be free from your vastly different biology: its over grazing, violence and arrogation of resources.

We want to be free from your hyper-assertiveness and its self righteous arrogation of partners, exponential breeding, out of marriage and so young as to lead straight to poverty, at our expense, disease, violence, destruction.

“anti-facist”, you should be convicted for inciting and promoting genocide of Whites,  murdering, raping, killing off our people, taking their vital resources and destroying our habitats. You are trying to affix your violent and parasitic people to Whites so that you can leech off of us, subsume us and take our lands - you have the nerve to come here, where I was minding my own business, attending to the cause of saving my people and tell me what the law should be, the evil notion that insulting words should be cause for imprisonment, and you compound your evil by saying it should be applied differently to my people and yours? You call me a “nazi” a “white supremacist”? You evil, self righteous, ape.

We do not want or need anything from you.


daniels,

Your problem is you possess abundant racial passion but lack racial prowess.

You don’t know me. I do not rise above the truth, like you and your failed tactics do, I assert the truth.

You would think that after all the energy you’ve poured into penning those rambling race essays

Where is the ramble and waste, Silver? It isn’t there. I am not issuing forth mere rambling words.

They ramble from your uncaring framework, not for people who care about what is relevant to European interests.

you might have learned a thing or two about the optimal responses to standard anti-racist attacks.

I am supposed to cower from the evil threats of this idiot, who thinks people should go to jail for using words that are insulting to him, while he should be able to do just the same? Time to change that.

But noooooo.  What a cinch you make it for antis to feel morally justified.

They are not justified. And, on the contrary, I make that more clear than right-wingers.


Anti-racism is to deny the right to make taxonomic classifications of different peoples and to discriminate on the basis of those classifications. It is Cartesian: it is not innocent. It is prejudiced. It is hurting and it is killing people.


99

Posted by Silver on Sun, 04 Nov 2012 06:47 | #

Anti-racism is to deny the right to make taxonomic classifications of different peoples and to discriminate on the basis of those classifications. It is Cartesian: it is not innocent. It is prejudiced. It is hurting and it is killing people.

Well, sure, I would agree (mostly) with this assessment.  The problem is most people don’t, and would seriously struggle to understand why you portray the issue that way.  Isn’t that obvious? 

I do not rise above the truth, like you and your failed tactics do, I assert the truth.

Don’t be silly.  It’s not merely about “truth”; it’s a matter of focus.  What should people focus their attention on?  Antis would have it that people should focus on all the ways in which whites are “evil,” all the ways in which whites “oppress” non-whites, all the ways in which whites owe non-whites, all the ways in which whites live large on the back of “white privilege,” and so on; and antis have been very successful in this endeavor.  You, on the other hand, would prefer focus were on all the ways in which whites suffer under the anti-racist dispensation and cite facts in order to draw attention to it; but it cannot be said that you have been successful in this endeavor. Quite simply, antis have been winning. Their “facts” (actually, very often lies) elbow yours out.  (Other racialists cite facts that highlight how superior whites are and what glories await whites who adopt a racial identity based on superiority, but their facts are also elbowed out.) Obviously antis were aided enormously by their capture of the media and universities, but so pathetic has the racialist response been that I happen to think it would have been a rout even if antis had been forced to compete on a level playing field.

Please take a minute to view this propaganda video featuring the Israeli Deputy Minister of Foreign Affairs.  http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XGYxLWUKwWo  I think it does an excellent job of presenting the Israeli position as reasonable and those opposed as unreasonable, but even more importantly it shifts the focus onto the status of the West Bank, rather than on the propriety of the establishment of Israel itself.  There’s no reason to believe that the existence of Israel is of less importance to Jews than the existence of the white race is to whites, but the casual, easygoing, non-threatening, conversational tone of the presentation is worlds apart from the feverish moral earnestness of “The White Genocide Project” and pretty much every other WN propaganda effort I’ve seen.  Or consider this press conference about “lawfare” http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HMF7guy2KkA It’s .hugely important for them, but there’s none of the speechifying so characteristic (and, typically, off-putting) of WN conferences.  Seriously, compare that to the wild exhortations of a Jonathan Bowden and ponder why even something as fundamental to group wellbeing as white racial representation is not even on the map.


100

Posted by daniels on Sun, 04 Nov 2012 07:37 | #

/.
You, on the other hand, would prefer focus were on all the ways in which whites suffer under the anti-racist dispensation and cite facts in order to draw attention to it; but it cannot be said that you have been successful in this endeavor.

I haven’t been at this long. The angle that I am taking has coalesced over the past few years and I’m just getting it out there. I like its chances very much because it does have the moral high ground; and I haven’t really seen anybody refute me as far as I am concerned. On the contrary, I see it gaining momentum.

There are some right wing arguments against me that are better than others. Some might say that we need Christians and Christianity as they have the numbers, history and tradition of devaluing Jewish power. However, I see our growing secularism and alternative moral order rendering that contention less and less important. People will want to survive, and Christianity is a convoluted means to survival at best.

Anti-racism is to deny the right to make taxonomic classifications of different peoples and to discriminate on the basis of those classifications. It is Cartesian: it is not innocent. It is prejudiced. It is hurting and it is killing people.

Well, sure, I would agree (mostly) with this assessment.  The problem is most people don’t, and would seriously struggle to understand why you portray the issue that way.  Isn’t that obvious? 

Well, this is Majority Rights, probably the most intellectual of the websites concerned for European peoples. Therefore, I might state things in an exacting form. I might try something else for a broad audience, starting with this:

Anti-racism is not innocent. It is prejudiced. It is hurting and it is killing people.

That is something that will be felt for its truth.

Then if they ask me what the hell I am talking about, I might add:

That is so because it is basically a movement to deny the classification of different peoples and the legitimate discrimination to systemically manage moral and ecological considerations on the basis of those classifications.

Ecological management and accountability is not feasible otherwise.

...

In a sense, Silver, you are criticizing me for the context to the thread: White genocide.

It is not my preferred argument, not by far (not the most ecological argument) But it is valid, and since some of my posts were moved here, I wound up arguing on this thread - fine. It is important. In the context of this thread I might sound, even be, more shrill than usual.

It is not that I am not open to different approaches, especially in different contexts.

I wouldn’t deny that WN’s can learn a few things from Israeli rhetoric - Jews are experts with language. However, there is no need for us to be as dishonest and exploitative as they are.  And there are times and places when being loud and mean is the way to be (they would tell you that too).


101

Posted by Thorn on Mon, 05 Nov 2012 07:43 | #

To save the white race, what we really need is a kind of mass-membership racial conservative (not nationalist) movement

.

Leon,

Perhaps it might be a good idea to consider Steve Sailer’s “citizenism” as a step in the right direction leading us to WP, WN or WZ (whichever you prefer).

I know the hard core WNs (and some not so hard core) reject Sailors proposition. But I for one think its a commonsensical place to start. Right off the bat, we’d get 99% of the TEA Party pulling for our side. A movement like taht has REAL potential to succeed…even in this hyper PC environment. “citizenism” is not only a logical step in the right direction, it has sufficient built-in insulation from the usual attacks and name calling by the multicults and “anti-racists” etc.

—-

Stave Sailor speaking: He [Jared Taylor] has objected to my calling myself a “citizenist”, arguing:

“‘Citizenism’ assumes that race can be made not to matter, and that citizens will set aside parochial ethnic interests for the good of all…. What course of action would he propose for white people?

“Continue to preach ‘citizenism’ when no one else practices it?

“Continue to fill the country with people who do not hesitate to advance their interests—material, cultural, and biological—at the expense of whites?”

Yet, as the swordsman Inigo Montoya tells the villain Vizzini in the movie The Princess Bride, “I do not think that word means what you think it means.”

Sourse, and worth the read:

http://www.vdare.com/articles/citizenism-vs-white-nationalism-ii-sailer-sums-up

And of course “citizenism” —or some variation of such—can always be tweaked, modified and adjusted as needed.


102

Posted by Thorn on Mon, 05 Nov 2012 07:46 | #

Spelling correction: Steve Sailer


103

Posted by DanielS on Wed, 19 Dec 2012 09:25 | #

[11:18:58 AM] Лариса: We`ll go to watch a ballet performance
[11:19:05 AM] daniel: excellent
[11:19:11 AM] Лариса: Lula Washington
[11:19:14 AM] daniel: that is always good, calming and healing for the mind.
[11:19:29 AM]Лариса: from the usa
[11:19:33 AM | daniel: n****r?
[11:21:07 AM]Лариса: yes
[11:21:26 AM] Лариса: not a big problem
[11:21:30 AM] daniel: depends..If she brings many ... with her..it is not good.
[11:21:56 AM] Лариса: yes
[11:22:00 AM] daniel: You know..
[11:22:10 AM] daniel: the scientific evidence is in:
[11:22:11 AM] Лариса: it`s just a performance
[11:22:14 AM] daniel: but..
[11:22:35 AM] daniel: if one n****r has a baby with a White Russian in Noyabr’sk
[11:22:49 AM] Лариса: no
[11:22:50 AM] daniel: it is exponential genetic destruction
[11:23:01 AM] Лариса: Daniel…
[11:23:13 AM] daniel: I know we are talking about different things.
[11:23:20 AM] Лариса: YES
[11:23:21 AM] daniel: I just want to emphasize that.. because it is important.
[11:23:30 AM] daniel: I enjoy the ballet
[11:23:38 AM] daniel: and I think you will have a good time
[11:23:57 AM] Лариса: me too
[11:23:59 AM] daniel: but notice - the name Washington.
[11:24:22 AM] daniel: where do you see White people with that name anymore?
[11:24:26 AM] daniel: you don’t.
[11:24:30 AM] daniel: it just goes to show…
[11:24:36 AM] Лариса: yes+


104

Posted by Tam on Thu, 03 Jan 2013 16:16 | #

I came upon your site and found some of it interesting, however if left me curious about something. If the white race is being abolished due to race mixing, then correct me if I am wrong but what is happening to the other races they are mixing with? Are they not essentially being abolished or washed out as well? I mean surely this is not only affecting the white race.


105

Posted by DanielS on Thu, 03 Jan 2013 16:39 | #

Posted by Tam on January 03, 2013, 04:16 PM | #

I came upon your site and found some of it interesting, however if left me curious about something. If the white race is being abolished due to race mixing, then correct me if I am wrong but what is happening to the other races they are mixing with? Are they not essentially being abolished or washed out as well? I mean surely this is not only affecting the white race.


No, they all have plenty of their pure stock. And their lands are are all circumscribed in accordance with discrimination based on their interests, whereas White lands are not allowed that discrimination.


106

Posted by Mandzukic on Tue, 22 Jan 2013 08:44 | #

@Tam, are you serious?  Because Asian countries are almost entirely filled with Asian people, if all the non-Asians in Asian countries “assimilate” (i.e. intermarry) with Asians, Asian countries will still be almost entirely Asian; same for Negro/black countries, Arab countries, etc.  However, if all the non-whites living in white countries “assimilate” (i.e. intermarry) with whites, a GREAT portion of my RACE, the Aryan/white RACE, disappears.  GENOCIDE is the physical destruction of a RACE in whole or in part; IT DOES NOT HAVE TO BE VIOLENT!  No other RACE is facing this Annihilation-by-assimilation.  And my RACE, the Aryan RACE, is a small global minority compared to Asians and Negros to boot!  Aryans never approved of massive 3rd world immigration, FORCED desegregation/integration and “assimilation” in EVERY white country and ONLY white countries; not to mention the 24/7 miscegenation marketing, and “anti-racist” campaigns that ONLY exist in Aryan countries and ALWAYS target Aryans.  Turning white countries into brown/3rd-world countries also happens to be the DUMBEST idea/policy in human history.  GENOCIDE is the most serious crime, and stupidity is a Capital Offense.  Anti-whites are guilty on both counts; therefore, their future for anti-whites IS the abyss.  Anti-racist is a code word for anti-white.


107

Posted by DanielS. on Sat, 26 Jan 2013 10:06 | #

Kemau Kambon

“The one idea is: how are we going to exterminate White people because that is in my estimation is the only conclusion. We have to exterminate White people off the face of the earth. We cannot be diverted from coming up with a solution to the problem on this planet and the problem is White people.”

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0vYML_F1Nb0


108

Posted by Thorn on Sat, 26 Jan 2013 10:19 | #

Something to seriously consider when trying to understand how and why the moral degeneration of American culture occurred.

Modern liberalism may not be quite the correct name for what I have in mind. I use the phrase to mean the latest stage of the liberalism that has been growing in the West for at least two and a half centuries, and probably longer. Nor does this suggest that I think liberalism was always a bad idea. So long as it was tempered by opposing authorities and traditions[Thorn note: That authority, of course, was the Church], it was a splendid idea. It is the collapse of those tempering forces that has brought us to a triumphant modern liberalism with all the cultural and social degradation that follows in its wake. If you do not think “modern liberalism” an appropriate name, substitute “radical liberalism” or “sentimental liberalism” or even, save us, post- liberalism.” Whatever name is used, most readers will recognize the species. The defining characteristics of modern liberalism are radical egalitarianism (the equality of outcomes rather than of opportunities) and radical individualism (the drastic reduction of limits to personal gratification). These may seem an odd pair, for individualism means liberty and liberty produces inequality, while equality of outcomes means coercion and coercion destroys liberty. If they are to operate simultaneously, radical egalitarianism and radical individualism, where they would compete, must be kept apart, must operate in different areas of life. That is precisely what we see in today’s culture.

Modern liberalism very different in content from the liberalism of, say, the 1940s or 1950s, and certainly different from the liberalism of the last century. The sentiments and beliefs that drive it, however, are the same: the ideals of liberty and equality. These ideals produced the great political, social, and cultural achievements of Western civilization, but no ideal, however worthy, can be pressed forever without turning into something else, turning in fact into its opposite. This is what is happening now. Not a single American institution, from popular music to higher education to science, has remained untouched.

(Robert H. Bork, Slouching Toward Gomorrah, pp. 4, 5, 6.)


109

Posted by DanielS. on Sat, 26 Jan 2013 11:02 | #

Thorn, is this last post of yours particularly relevant to “The White Genocide Project” or is it that you have some kind of idea that perhaps you or “the Church” must have the last word?


110

Posted by Thorn on Sat, 26 Jan 2013 11:19 | #

Daniels,

I wasn’t paying attention and accidentally posted it here. It was meant for the Las Vegas is a Shining Beacon of Nihilism thread.

Maybe GW or Lurker could move it there?


111

Posted by DanielS. on Sat, 26 Jan 2013 11:25 | #

aha. I’ve done that a couple times myself, posted in the wrong place.


112

Posted by daniel on Thu, 31 Jan 2013 04:43 | #

It can be victimized to help oneself armed combat let
down endorse painful sensation as advantageously as the
fact that it’s one of many TENS units uncommitted on the market place for it has continued to maturate. There’s no
acquiring about the fact that it’s one of many TENS units uncommitted on the market place, but the aurawave delivers.


113

Posted by Thorn on Thu, 23 May 2013 12:37 | #

He has all the fundamentals down.

Twilight introduction

http://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=player_embedded&v=Dg5N4JPPDXE


114

Posted by Thesis Editing on Tue, 25 Jun 2013 19:45 | #

Hello,

I was actually googling for information on Thesis Editing and then I ended up on your website.

Regina


115

Posted by Wesley Clark and Nicholas Sarkozy on Wed, 08 Jul 2015 13:32 | #

At Red Ice, Tim Murdoch presents the case for high level intent to genocide Whites.

Clear examples:

1. General Wesley Clark’s statement that:

“In the modern Europe there is no room for homogeneous national states. It was an idea from 1800s, and we are going to carry it (multi-culturalism) through ...and we are going to create multi-ethnic states.” His military command proceeded to bomb Serbia.

2. Nicholas Sarkozy, who proclaimed that if “volunteerism” won’t work to force miscegenation then “coercion must be used”..

http://www.redicecreations.com/radio/2015/07/RIR-150706.php



Post a comment:


Name: (required)

Email: (required but not displayed)

URL: (optional)

Note: You should copy your comment to the clipboard or paste it somewhere before submitting it, so that it will not be lost if the session times out.

Remember me


Next entry: The Problem of Democracy
Previous entry: Internecine Rodent War: No Biscuit!

image of the day

Existential Issues

DNA Nations

Establishment Problem

Categories

Links

Endorsement not implied.

Immigration

Islamist Threat

Anti-white Media Networks

Audio/Video

Crime

Economics

Education

General

Historical Re-Evaluation

Controlled Opposition

Nationalist Political Parties

Science

Europeans in Africa

Of Note

Comments

Guessedworker commented in entry 'Improving prospects for the AfD' on Fri, 22 Sep 2017 17:09. (View)

DanielS commented in entry 'Improving prospects for the AfD' on Fri, 22 Sep 2017 15:15. (View)

Guessedworker commented in entry 'Improving prospects for the AfD' on Fri, 22 Sep 2017 11:45. (View)

Maria lashes Turks and Caicos commented in entry 'Hurricane Irmina Gathering - Worst Case Scenario is Worse than Harvey, Worse than Katrina [updates]' on Fri, 22 Sep 2017 10:56. (View)

Christian Zionism: The Tragedy & The Turning commented in entry 'Donald Trump gives Benjamin Netanyahu everything he wants.' on Fri, 22 Sep 2017 10:01. (View)

Half empty stadium for Rams/ 49ers commented in entry 'Seduction of NFL Films, Appeal of L.A. Rams 60's, 70's, dodging legacy of sports-fan cuckoldry' on Fri, 22 Sep 2017 07:50. (View)

AltRight Politics: Imperialism commented in entry 'Russia's Geography Problem' on Fri, 22 Sep 2017 06:05. (View)

The enemy is already within the gates commented in entry ''White privilege' as a warrant for expropriation; Christianity as the executing jurisdiction.' on Fri, 22 Sep 2017 00:03. (View)

Conclusion Jorjani statement on Altright.com commented in entry 'Acrimony on the Alt-Right: Predictably, the Inherent Instability of The Right Emerges' on Thu, 21 Sep 2017 22:09. (View)

Jason Jorjani: Why I left Altright.com Inc. commented in entry 'Acrimony on the Alt-Right: Predictably, the Inherent Instability of The Right Emerges' on Thu, 21 Sep 2017 22:07. (View)

Vietnam war documentary by Ken Burns commented in entry 'Fuck You Right Wing. Fuck You Alternative Right. The White Class Will Prevail and is Here to Stay.' on Thu, 21 Sep 2017 19:48. (View)

DanielS commented in entry 'Improving prospects for the AfD' on Thu, 21 Sep 2017 18:58. (View)

Guessedworker commented in entry 'Improving prospects for the AfD' on Thu, 21 Sep 2017 17:14. (View)

The Hackers tried to destroy Red Ice commented in entry 'Red Ice Radio interviews Majorityrights roundtable about Brexit.' on Thu, 21 Sep 2017 11:33. (View)

European Girl marries into Isil commented in entry 'German girls being conditioned to be mothers with black baby simulator dolls' on Thu, 21 Sep 2017 04:56. (View)

The Viennna School of Logical Positivism commented in entry 'Improving prospects for the AfD' on Thu, 21 Sep 2017 04:21. (View)

DanielS commented in entry 'Improving prospects for the AfD' on Thu, 21 Sep 2017 02:34. (View)

Guessedworker commented in entry 'Improving prospects for the AfD' on Thu, 21 Sep 2017 02:10. (View)

Captainchaos commented in entry 'Improving prospects for the AfD' on Wed, 20 Sep 2017 22:41. (View)

DanielS commented in entry 'Improving prospects for the AfD' on Wed, 20 Sep 2017 14:37. (View)

Enoch Powell: I underestimated magnitude & danger commented in entry 'True Briton & Oswald Mosley's Union Movement' on Wed, 20 Sep 2017 14:34. (View)

Guessedworker commented in entry 'Improving prospects for the AfD' on Wed, 20 Sep 2017 14:00. (View)

DanielS commented in entry 'Improving prospects for the AfD' on Wed, 20 Sep 2017 10:04. (View)

Chances of uniting America dwindling commented in entry 'Trump signs resolution condemning White supremacists' on Wed, 20 Sep 2017 09:26. (View)

Evacuate Puerto Ricans or die commented in entry 'Hurricane Irmina Gathering - Worst Case Scenario is Worse than Harvey, Worse than Katrina [updates]' on Wed, 20 Sep 2017 03:45. (View)

Hungary Schengen fence celebrates 2yrs commented in entry 'The indisputable success of the Hungarian border fence' on Tue, 19 Sep 2017 23:43. (View)

Maria, I've just met a hurricane named Maria commented in entry 'Hurricane Irmina Gathering - Worst Case Scenario is Worse than Harvey, Worse than Katrina [updates]' on Tue, 19 Sep 2017 10:36. (View)

DanielS commented in entry 'Pragmatism as ethnonationalism's tool against radical skepticism' on Tue, 19 Sep 2017 01:19. (View)

Captainchaos commented in entry 'Pragmatism as ethnonationalism's tool against radical skepticism' on Tue, 19 Sep 2017 00:18. (View)

Captainchaos commented in entry 'Pragmatism as ethnonationalism's tool against radical skepticism' on Mon, 18 Sep 2017 23:54. (View)

A German woman this time commented in entry 'Polish tourist is gang-raped on an Italian beach while her helpless boyfriend is forced to watch' on Mon, 18 Sep 2017 09:45. (View)

Putin's Chekist side vs the Magnitsky Act commented in entry 'Alt-Right Leaders Passion for Putin' on Mon, 18 Sep 2017 08:12. (View)

DanielS commented in entry 'Pragmatism as ethnonationalism's tool against radical skepticism' on Mon, 18 Sep 2017 01:30. (View)

DanielS commented in entry 'Who do you wish to hear from on Majorityrights Radio?' on Mon, 18 Sep 2017 01:06. (View)

Captainchaos commented in entry 'Pragmatism as ethnonationalism's tool against radical skepticism' on Sun, 17 Sep 2017 18:49. (View)

affection-tone