Posted by Robert Reis on Fri, 06 Jun 2008 22:08 | #

Bravo!

Posted by Laurel Loflund on Sat, 07 Jun 2008 03:20 | #

Good job!

Laurel

Posted by Riley DeWiley on Sat, 07 Jun 2008 08:46 | #

That looked like a hell of a lot more fun than the tedious speechifying BS-a-thon I went to in King County a few weeks back. I am sorry I missed it.

Good show, folks. I think if we get a posse together we can still take back the Republican Party.

Riley

Posted by Frank McGuckin on Sat, 07 Jun 2008 13:00 | #

IF Ron Paul is elected President of the United Staes non-white legal immigration will increase dramatically. This of course is just another way to kill of the Euro-American population. Ron Paul is a whore for the corporation. Paulites are a bunch of little wierdos.

Posted by James Bowery on Sat, 07 Jun 2008 17:22 | #

Ron Paul’s campaign website statement on immigration:

The talk must stop.  We must secure our borders now.  A nation without secure borders is no nation at all. It makes no sense to fight terrorists abroad when our own front door is left unlocked.  This is my six point plan:

* Physically secure our borders and coastlines. We must do whatever it takes to control entry into our country before we undertake complicated immigration reform proposals.
* Enforce visa rules.  Immigration officials must track visa holders and deport anyone who overstays their visa or otherwise violates U.S. law.  This is especially important when we recall that a number of 9/11 terrorists had expired visas.
* No amnesty.  Estimates suggest that 10 to 20 million people are in our country illegally. That’s a lot of people to reward for breaking our laws.
* No welfare for illegal aliens.  Americans have welcomed immigrants who seek opportunity, work hard, and play by the rules.  But taxpayers should not pay for illegal immigrants who use hospitals, clinics, schools, roads, and social services.
* End birthright citizenship.  As long as illegal immigrants know their children born here will be citizens, the incentive to enter the U.S.  illegally will remain strong.
* Pass true immigration reform.  The current system is incoherent and unfair.  But current reform proposals would allow up to <u>60 million</u> more immigrants into our country, according to the Heritage Foundation.  This is insanity.  Legal immigrants from all countries should face the same rules and waiting periods.

Perhaps he’s misleading his supporters, but if being gullible qualifies one as a “little weirdo” then I would say the vast majority of whites are “little weirdos”.

Posted by Frank McGuckin on Sat, 07 Jun 2008 20:10 | #

James, I’m going by the vdare.com interview. Yeah why not extend the weirdo slur to a lot of white folks. A lot of White Americans have been going along with the atomized individual capitalist maximizing his or her utility function. The enemy has had a very easy time picking them off. It is a mindset the Libertarians will encourage.Without a strong racial identity and a strong ethos of White solidarity, White Americans are defenseless against the beast.

Libertarians are vey weak on corporate power which is outcome of giving corprations the legal standing of human beings. Who do you think is pushing the race mixing in all these TV commercials pair White American woman with the negro male.

Posted by Fred Scrooby on Sat, 07 Jun 2008 20:21 | #

“Who do you think is pushing the race mixing in all these TV commercials pair White American woman with the negro male.”  (—GT)

Let me guess:  for the most part, corporations with a certain ethnicity at the helm, with allied co-ethnics at every level of society ready to skewer any corporate execs of a different ethnicity who don’t conform to the pattern thus set?  Or is it normal for a person (or nation) to take a hammer and proceed to hammer a nail into his own head?  Hey I could be wrong, I don’t claim to be infallible.  Maybe that’s normal.  I just never saw it, that’s all.  You know, walking down the street, I never saw a guy hammering a nail into his own head but hey, maybe I need to get out more.

Posted by Fred Scrooby on Sat, 07 Jun 2008 21:34 | #

The Libertarians tend to be pro-open-borders/pro-race-replacement fanatics (apologies to Norman Lowell who calls himself a libertarian but isn’t one, far from it):

http://blog.vdare.com/archives/2008/06/06/epstein-barr-infects-libertarian-convention/

Posted by James Bowery on Sat, 07 Jun 2008 22:02 | #

I see no problem with hostility toward “Libertarians” with a capital “L” since they are dyed-in-the-wool hypocrites, but since individualism is something that characterizes our people as a group it is very bad to be hostile to libertarians (small “l”) who are not hypocrites—a group that, however small, is still more an expression of our character than the highly evolved hence instinctive nepotism that characterizes others.

As I’ve written before in Deep Libertarianism: Human Ecology there are some serious problems with Ron Paul’s flavor of “libertarianism” despite the fact that he has moved away from that ideology and toward “constitutionalism” with its necessary adjuct of “national sovereignty”.

The fact that Ron Paul participates in some libertarian hypocrisy doesn’t mean he is as bad as the other candidates—and I include Tancredo in that list.  Tancredo’s middle east policy is only marginally more forgivable than Ron Paul’s waffling on immigration—and Ron Paul’s removal of economic rent from the public choice miasma is right up there with sealing the borders since that economic rent is currently subsidizing fertility of invading nepotists.

Posted by Frank McGuckin on Sat, 07 Jun 2008 23:52 | #

James

There is a very good chance that Barack Obama will be the next president of the United States. The night that the election results are in, the MSM will announce that White America is history. A Libertarian response to this all out assault on White Americans would be way too anemic. Ron Paul is way too comited to America as an idea nation nonsense.

I don’t hate Libertarians. I think we need them around. But we will be in a state of war after Nov 4. The Democrats will very likely take control of the congress and amnesty will be passed soon afterwoods. White America won’t know what the hell hit it them.  If vdare.com doesn’t become a full-blown raicalist organization by this point in time, I will write vdare.com off. How much longer will vdare.com allow the enemy to define the terms of the debate.

You know putting the issue of the demographuic transformation of America on hold for a moment, you would think that the thought of an America with one billion people posssibly within 25 years-amesty + an increase in legal immigration-would scare the shit out of White Americans. There will probalby be a high level of destruction-ecosystems,economy and greatly diminished opportunities..throw in a war or two- of America before a White revolt ocurs. But when it occurs it will be merciless.

What do you think,a severe drought in the American South this summer?

Question for Scrooby:should we make a distinction at this point in time between ordinary Jews and Jewish-Aipac and the rest- organizations? In other words, are ordinary American JEws on board with the racial and economic dispossession of European Americans?

Posted by Fred Scrooby on Sun, 08 Jun 2008 01:14 | #

“Question for Scrooby:  [...A]re ordinary American Jews on board with the racial and economic dispossession of European Americans?”  (—Frank McGuckin)

I don’t know to what extent ordinary Jews are on board with it.  I sometimes wonder the same thing.  Where I live I have no contact with Jews with whom I can casually discuss matters of this nature “off the record.”  I have almost no contact with Jews, period, except very superficially with a few, almost nothing.  I have a Jewish in-law who works not in immigration but in a field very close to immigration at a big-city international airport, such that he’s very close to immigration issues.  I had occasion to talk to him on the phone a couple of months ago and sounded him out on things.  He’s on the front lines, down in the trenches, so to speak, right in the thick of this massive non-stop importation of the non-white Third World.  He kept agreeing the situation was “crazy,” “they’re letting everyone in the world in,” “it’s coming from Washington, D.C., the policies that are doing this,” “it’s scary,” “it’s totally crazy, insane, I haven’t seen it like this is 18 years,” “at work we just have to do what we’re told, handle it as best we can, it’s a zoo,” were how his comments went.  He was completely disgusted by it and somewhat overwhelmed with the difficulty of dealing with it at his work.  But it was impossible for me to probe further along the lines of race-replacement.  It’s delicate enough getting into that with a Euro; with a Jew it’s a hundred times more delicate, nay a thousand times more.  They absolutely don’t like approaching anywhere near that sort of topic and if you “probe” beyond the barest superficialities you immediately feel the signs of tension saying “Don’t go there” — an increasingly annoyed tone to the voice, the answers become more snappish, there’s slight but unmistakable irritation, maybe overt disapproval, the topic starts to get changed, perhaps explicit words get said, what might be subtle insinuations perhaps, and it’s time to talk about something else.

I’d say there are plenty of Jews who are as alarmed as we are but they’re not going to lead the fight against it, one reason being they see it as ultimately not their fight, but ours.  (In some ways it’s a little like ordinary New York City working-class Italians and the mafia — even though they may disapprove of the mafia, it’s still sort of part of them; there’s a way in which they side with it more than they side with us.  Jews are sort of like that vis-a-vis their élite layers — they can’t detach themselves from them.  They’re way more like that than, say, WASPs are vis-a-vis their élite layers.)  And that’s as it should be:  we don’t need anyone else leading the fight:  we can do that.  What we need is for more of them to keep out of our way.  These Jews who are opposed to what’s going on look at us and wonder why we’re not fighting.  They are secretly — or not so secretly — rooting for us and would root even more if we showed the slightest sign of wakening from our torpor.  They’d feel immense relief if we started fighting effectively and gaining ground (and of course didn’t do anything to disturb Jews).  But all Jews are conflicted in at least one very big sense:  to fight this thing we have no choice but to “name the Jew,” as the WNs put it — identify, openly declare, the degree of culpability of the Jewish élites and organized Jewry, we simply have no choice as I see it — and no Jew approves of our doing that.  All hate it, absolutely loathe it, even those who sincerely wish we’d start fighting back.  They don’t understand that when you are fighting, your enemy has to be clearly identified.  Attempting to fight what you can’t clearly see is certain death — yours.  So, first, before anything else, all parties who are doing this to you have to be clearly identified.

One thing is to disregard the fact that the Jews hate this or that which we need to do:  we have to do it and they’ll have to get used to it.  We didn’t start this and we never wanted it.  If the ones doing it would stop, we’d like nothing better than to all go home.

Posted by Fred Scrooby on Sun, 08 Jun 2008 01:27 | #

And no, I don’t think it’s managerialism doing it, or liberalism, or some sort of po-mo evolution afflicting Euro civilization.  I used to believe in those but I’ve come to see them as miasma theories.  I see things now in terms of the germ theory:  specific germs are doing this, and they can be identified and cured, which miasmas can’t.

Posted by Fred Scrooby on Sun, 08 Jun 2008 03:17 | #

But all Jews are conflicted in at least one very big sense:  to fight this thing we have no choice but to “name the Jew,” as the WNs put it — identify, openly declare, the degree of culpability of the Jewish élites and organized Jewry, we simply have no choice as I see it — and no Jew approves of our doing that.  All hate it, absolutely loathe it, even those who sincerely wish we’d start fighting back.  (—from my comment)

I left out the biggest reason they loathe it:  they deny Jews are doing it.  They deny Jews are doing anything wrong.  They think it’s all coming from us, the Euros.  So when someone on our side says the Jews are doing it, they think there’s something deeply wrong with him and by extension with us his friends, something sick, frightening, and threatening, and they more than hate it — it sort of puts them mentally in “our backs are to the wall” mode.  It’s a huge reaction.

Posted by James Bowery on Sun, 08 Jun 2008 04:11 | #

specific germs are doing this, and they can be identified and cured, which miasmas can’t.

Fred is correct, of course, my prior artistic license in using “public choice miasma” notwithstanding.  Public choice rent seeking is a failure mode of civilization that, like opiate addiction in individuals, can be and is exploited by “pushers” serving their own evolutionary interests.

Posted by the Narrator... on Sun, 08 Jun 2008 11:42 | #

“Ron Paul is way too comited to America as an idea nation nonsense.”
Frank McGuckin

That and he seems to be running for an America that hasn’t existed since, perhaps, the early 70’s.

As long as there is no draft, ‘continuous wars’ will be a non-issue for most Americans.

Immigration, legal and illegal, is the issue of our times. The ONLY issue.

What is happening to America (and the entire Western world) in regards to non-White migration, is the single most significant event of our entire Western history, because it is an assault on our very identity as a distinct people.

We have about 25 years (which isn’t a long time) before we cross the point of no return.

“The night that the election results are in, the MSM will announce that White America is history.”
Frank McGuckin

And to a large extent they’ll be right, which is why folks should be careful about saying it doesn’t matter who our next president is.

A President declaring Amnesty is really only symbolic, as the defeat of the Amnesty Bill two years ago did nothing to abate the flow of people across the border anyway. In fact it continues to increase.
And the flow of legal immigrants, refugees and asylum seekers falls outside of the Amnesty debate and will continue on, perhaps increasing as well.
It (the Amnesty debate) also does nothing to address the tens of millions of third worlders here now who can already lay claim on legal citizenship and are out breeding Whites 3 to 1.

America is gone, and is not coming back. All we can hope to do now on this balkanized ghetto of a continent, is to re-awaken and re-assemble Whites into a distinct group willing to struggle for their own survival.

Our first, and current, battlefield is the intellectual/psychological one. If Whites won’t recognize themselves as a distinct group, then they are not likely to fight to survive as a distinct group.

And that is why an Obama election would serve as a deep psychological shock to most Whites, and one from which they will not likely return.
After an Obama election we will see a general societal swing so far to the left that it would give Marx pause.
America will look and “FEEL” like Jonestown the day after such an election.

Just Look at events in the recent past.
The spread of Aids not only did not bring a return to traditional morality and a denunciation of the homosexual lifestyle, but rather reinvigorated the movement to dismantle the White traditional family at an even greater speed.
The compelling visuals of post-Katrina black behavior in New Orleans did not lead to a flood of suddenly awakened Whites into the racialist philosophy.
After 911 we not only got more immigration but heard louder calls for diversity…..increasingly from the Right.
As history has shown, worse is not better.

And as bad as McCain might be on Amnesty and Future Wars, if Obama wins the election I expect we’ll see the White National and Racialist movements quickly fade into a pale shadow of what they are now. In fact within 6 to 12 months of such an election I believe we’ll see formerly ardent White Nationalists (many of them ‘leaders) pull away from the movement altogether and resubmit themselves to “the new multicultural reality”.

And then, in 2010, the US census will suddenly and mysteriously cease to count Jews as White…

Posted by Frank McGuckin on Sun, 08 Jun 2008 12:20 | #

Narrator

But if White Americans do fight back, there things that can be done

Posted by .357 on Sun, 08 Jun 2008 12:46 | #

I hate to admit it, but “the Narrator” sees the situation as I do.

The decisive battle in the war for the survival of the white-race was fought in the 1960’s. We lost. The question is: Can white-racial-pride be reconstituted? Answer: If the younger white-generation’s attitude toward race is any indication of white-pride, then I’m afraid it’s curtains for us.

Maybe Obama’s election will—in an odd way—serve us better than a McCain election. David Duke made a good point when he recently said:

“In reality, Barack Hussein Obama is no more of a danger to the interests of the White American than Hillary Clinton or John McCain. Perhaps he is even less of one, for when traitors become your own leaders they are much more dangerous to you than a powerful enemy outside of your own ranks.”

In any event, whether it’s McCain or Obama, the foreseeable future looks bleak. The movement towards the annihilation of the white-race will continue to escalate at breakneck speed. But all is not lost. There is still a glimmer of hope!

P.S.

“Victory is won not in miles but in inches. Win a little now, hold your ground, and later, win a little more.”– Louis L’Amour

Kudos go to brave people like, James Bowery, who are out there winning those small victories.

Posted by Frank McGuckin on Sun, 08 Jun 2008 13:42 | #

We are supposed to encourage our fellow Europeans to fight back, not to raise the white flag of surrender.Whether you think White Americans will fight back or not depends on the assumptions one makes on how White Americans will react to increasing racial and economic dispossession.

For example, suppose there is a large enough population of young White males who don’t earn enough $$$ to start and support a family while at the same time there is a rapidly growing population of young asian and muslim males with middle class homes and the golden retriever. How will White American parents react to this? A huge investment was made on their part to get their children to the point where they can start families.

If White Americans do decide to fight back there things thwt can be done:1)mass deportion of illegal aliens2)complete shutdown of all Legal immigration3)deportation of asian and muslim fifth column elements.

In the non-wjite areas of the nation, it will be hard to do this. But drawing a line in the sand is a good first start..

White Americans beleive act like their there is infinite amount of space within the borders of the America. Well, there isn’t. So there are two possibilities:1)pave everything over or 2)be good environmentalist and bring sprawl to a halt. Both are unplesant possibilities.

I beleive with 100 percent certainty that if the left/liberal environmentalists had gotten their way years ago and brought all sprawl to halt, all immigration legal and illegal immigration would have been shut down completely to 0. No mercy would have been shown.

Here is the point of this little gedankenexperemente. One can can imagine a nasty and merciless revolt against post-1965 immigrants and their descendants under the right circumstances. Kill the White midle class dream and there will be no incentive for White Americans to give their allegiance to the Republcian/Democratic beltway consensus. The glue that holds the consensus it together will have ben stripped away.

The day after 9/11, White rage became briefly uncorked. It scared the shit out of the muslims and asians. It scared the shit out the homosexual infested Bush administration.

Posted by Frank McGuckin on Sun, 08 Jun 2008 14:04 | #

Young White American Males are not part of the youth movement that is rallying around Barack Obama. That’s not what I see.

Posted by the Narrator... on Sun, 08 Jun 2008 14:14 | #

It’s not that we, as a race, are finished yet. We can, in a moments notice, reassert ourselves and lay hold of a future for our people. We just have to want to do it first.
What is lost though, is what we were, had and could/should have been. (Can you just imagine what America could have looked like in 2010 if the third world flood gates had not been opened….90% to 95% White with a stable population of about 185 million people.-)

That is what I mean is lost, never to be regained. And that is what I truly regret having lost.

Yes we can have a future for our people, but it is a future (even at best) that is now on a far different trajectory than the one which we were on just 40 years ago.

The trouble with an Obama Presidency is that it will cause many Whites to lapse into permanent amnesia as to their own (and their Nation’s) identity. Many people are naturally reluctant to look back at what they’ve lost when what they’ve lost is better than the circumstances they are now in. “Accept it and deal with it”, is todays motto.
And make no mistake, the media will help them forget!

As long as Whites are still afforded the psychological comfort with which to reflect and remember, they can still be reached. (As an older White person once explained to me, when I was putting forth the realities of the harshness of life in a future ghettofied America, “People will adapt’)

This is the problem with crossing that racial threshold of a black President. People will adapt by “looking ahead” or “moving on”.

New things tend to make you forget, while old (as in familiar) things make you (or allow you the room to) remember. And most rational people want to remember because it is in memories that we again lay claim to our own identities; to our sense of self.
The man who forgets who he is, is the man that never was.
Already a great many Whites don’t know, or have chosen to forget, who they are/were as a people.

Just turn your t.v.‘s on now and see what we are being told is the future of America. You’ll see a black man (Obama) and a White woman (Hilary) at center stage, with the politically and socially cuckolded White man (Bill) standing off to the side.

As we should all know by now, we can never underestimate the power of the media and simple visual images to alter and refocus the perceptions and expectations of the masses…

Posted by .357 on Sun, 08 Jun 2008 14:39 | #

“The day after 9/11, White rage became briefly uncorked. It scared the shit out of the muslims and asians. It scared the shit out the homosexual infested Bush administration.”

Yes, indeed!

Keep in mind, this is a race against time and time isn’t on our side. All the enemies of the white-race (led by the Jews) are in a mad rush to flood the USA with enough non-whites to make whites a minority before our false-prosperity evaporates. Their plan is to make sure that by the time the economy collapses, whites will be too few in number and too fragmented to be able to organise and launch an effective revolution. The best we can hope for is a revolution before we become an ineffectual minority.

Posted by Frank McGuckin on Sun, 08 Jun 2008 15:12 | #

Narrator

I really don’t think White Americans will be able to adapt to being the asians bitch in the workplace,renting part of a home forliving space,twenty year waiting list for yellow stone and other great national and state parks. being lectured to everyday at school. the workplace, tv and the MSM in general about evil whitey. It is going to e a hell of a lot more unpleasant than it is now by many orders of magnitude.

About the loss. No quesstion about it. Texas will be colonized by Mexico. California, exceprt for the very northern part of the state will be lost. Arizona gone. Long ISland and parts of NJ gone. What to do? Cordon off these areas and let them rot. It will send a very strong message to White America:you want more of the cesspool. Here it is in its full glory. If White America doesn’t learn a lesson from this, more territitory will be lost. It will at some point in time feel very crowded in the southern states and Idaho and Montana.

Maybe White Women will turn on their White husbands and say"enough is enough goddamit with the jock sniffining go out and fight for your family faggot.” You never know.

It is becomming very expensive to live in Florida these days.

I like the cordon sanitaire policy. I want to see California rot really bad. Shit flowing down the streets:severe droughts;destruction of ecosystems;collapse of the health car system:race riots..have I forgotten anything.Burn baby burn.

Thee half-breed Barack OBama son of white whore will not turn the economy around.

Fact:A majority of White Americans will not vote for the negro half-breed Barack Obama. Many will stay home on Nov4. Many will vote Republican.

Posted by 123 on Sun, 08 Jun 2008 17:08 | #

“The decisive battle in the war for the survival of the white-race was fought in the 1960’s. We lost.”

Wrong. Loose it we did, but in ‘39-‘45.

On the one side were those, who considered races to be different. The other side claiming all races to be the equal won. Thus for example the UN-declaration on racial differences (differences within a race supposedly to be larger than the difference between races and racism thus being bigotry and having no factual basis) is no surprise. And in the resulting intellectual climate, how could any white person (except the losers of course) anywhere on this world seriously (and honestly!!!) argue against racial equality? Since in essence WWII was fought to make this very point it means that whites were in reality intellectually disarmed, or rather had dis-armed themselves till today. And that is probably the main reason for the capitulation of whites during the 60’s in the USA and elsewhere, too. And this situation has not been getting any better with the passage of time, thanks to the concerted efforts of——-(fill in the gaps, to borrow from Fred Scrooby).

Now I realize, that many will disagree, still believing/hoping, that WWII was just the fight between good and the incarnation of evil, thereby making it a just and worthy war for the west. But precisely this “not wanting to face reality” is the weak point of the whites today. If one is intellectually honest, then one has to face the fact, if one has the belief on racial inequality, that one really is spiritually the same as those who lost the war.

Posted by James Bowery on Sun, 08 Jun 2008 20:37 | #

There is an important difference:

The men fighting for the Allies during WW II were unaware that they were fighting for a military decision on the scientific question “Are the races biologically equal in all respects relevant to social organization?”

The men fighting for the Allies during WW II were told that Germans had decided that Germans were “The Master Race” and that all others were to be subservient to them.

While men are almost always under illusions about the causes they fight for, it is pretty safe to say this may have been not only the greatest war ever fought, but the war fought and won by men under the greatest illusions.

These illusions were born of the mass media machines of the 20th century.

As those mass media machines are displaced in the public consciousness by new media machines with less centralized control, the question is: Will this deception come to light and if so how will those whose patrimony is illusion born of mass media technology, react?

Posted by torgrim on Mon, 09 Jun 2008 00:59 | #

It is noticable that as the generation that fought the battle against, “good and evil” are leaving this world, the new technology appears. And with the advent of both events, the grip of illusion for the causes of WWII, becomes more and more questioned, both in the new media and the old.

With so much lost, by those that gave their bodies in sacrifice, to reopen and question th reasons for that War, was something, I believe, many just would not face, expecially those responsible for pushing for war

Yes, I agree 1939-1945, decided the outcome of the 60’s.

The struggle for the intellectual battle should not demean the fallen of WWII, but instead, attempt to inform of who and what gained in that suicidal War.

Posted by .357 on Tue, 10 Jun 2008 13:39 | #

“Wrong. Loose it we did, but in ‘39-’45.
On the one side were those, who considered races to be different. The other side claiming all races to be the equal won.”—123

Using that criteria, then it would be more accurate to say: We (in the USA) lost in 1861–1865. The American Civil War laid the foundation for the anti-white-counter-culture-movement of the 1960’s.

WWII (“the unnecessary war”) served as a significant milestone on the way to our ongoing dispossession and eventual(?) genocide.

And let’s not forget about Vietnam. It was used as the catalyst to set in motion the massive political shift towards the anti-establishment, anti-white, left.

Posted by John on Sat, 14 Jun 2008 22:34 | #

Another victory:

http://www.idahostatesman.com/newsupdates/story/410950.html

Posted by James Bowery on Sun, 15 Jun 2008 01:11 | #

Actually, from John’s link Idaho’s Ron Paul supporters appear to have won more decisively than Washington State’s Ron Paul supporters did:

The state party’s platform committee voted overwhelmingly Friday to add to state platform language supporting abolishing the Federal Reserve System and pegging the dollar to gold and silver.

In Washington State, the resolution to repeal the 16th Amendment passed the platform committee by a mere 1 vote and the vote to require Constitutional formal declarations of war passed during an attempt by the McCain machine to disestablish the quorum via walkout.