We can no longer allow liberals and brackets to co-opt issues of environment and species diversity

Posted by DanielS on Monday, 09 January 2017 18:07.

This nonsense has got to stop.

#Earth2Trump

Join the Resistance to Trump’s Attack on Our Environment and Civil Rights

The #Earth2Trump Roadshow is coming — or has already come — to a town near you this month.

The roadshow is rallying and empowering defenders of civil rights and the environment to resist Trump’s dangerous agenda. Stopping in 16 cities on its way to D.C., it’s bringing thousands of people to protest at the presidential inauguration.

Having kicked off in Oakland and Seattle on Jan. 2, the #Earth2Trump Roadshow is touring the country bringing speakers, musicians, outrage, fun and hope to a total of 16 cities as it progresses toward the presidential inauguration on Jan. 20.

The free shows feature national and local speakers, great musicians, and an opportunity to join a growing movement of resistance to all forms of oppression and all attacks on our environment. We must stand and oppose every Trump policy that hurts wildlife; poisons our air and water; destroys our climate; promotes racism, misogyny or homophobia; and marginalizes entire segments of our society.

That includes White people and our species too, baldy. We are not Trump.
Trump does not represent White people, our best interests, nor our best relation to environment and others.

Brackets have been co-opting, along with their liberal trainees, issues of environmental and species diversity as if it is their cause and then militating against “racism” as if Europeans are not a species with habitat, as if discrimination against more prolific breeders and antagonistic species who encroach is not an essential capacity to maintain speciation and habitat sustainability; the liberals here also tuck a campaign against “misogyny” into their environmentalism, as if females should bear no critique on behalf of human ecology? As if hatred of men, White men, has not been open season for over 60 years now, and doesn’t warrant a response?

To allow our cause of European advocacy to be associated with right-wing destruction of human and natural ecology is no longer acceptable. Nor is it for the brackets to continually associate their liberal political causes with environmentalism and biodiversity.

We can give credit where credit is due to those living ecologically - e.g., a native American tribe living with the environment - great.

We can call to account our right-wingers and liberals where they are not living ecologically, where international capital, industrial, consumer society, liberal universalism impact ourselves and others deleteriously: a key difference of White Post Modernity is that unlike Modernity, it does not merely stop when it is forced to stop by nature. It recognizes internal relation, limits and differences that make a difference. It has a deliberate stance in that regard from the onset. Unlike the mono-culturalism of primitive groups and the universalim of liberal modernist societies, White Post Modernity recognizes the delimitations of pervasive ecology and reflexive effects in internal relation from the start....including instances where liberals and brackets try use “environmentalism” to prevent more developed countries from assisting growing ethnostates - and vis a versa, where they obstruct those growing ethno-states from cooperating with more developed nations in their contraction into ethno-states.

But we also need to be critical where criticism is due, not only of females, delicate and sensitive creatures though they are, not only of White right-wingers who screw-up the issue of ecology, in one way or another, where they try to deal with it, or where they’re downright antagonistic, but where racial groups impact the rest of the world.

Right wingers, liberals and their bracket masters are going to have to recognize that their “anti-racism” thing is a fundamental scourge against necessary human classification - which is requisite for accountability and necessary discrimination on behalf of human ecology, thus ultimately, all ecology.

Haida Gwaii, the remote archipelago off the coast of British Columbia

“The Haida people are the Haida people because of the land and the sea around us. If we don’t protect it, there won’t be an ‘us’ anymore.” - April Churchill, former vice president of the Haida Nation

Comments:

Posted by Trump: global warming concept created by Chinese on Fri, 13 Jan 2017 15:36 | #

Posted by Meimou on Fri, 13 Jan 2017 22:27 | #

Trump does not represent White people, our best interests, nor our best relation to environment and others.

He does not represent only whites. Whites will still benefit from his presidency

Posted by DanielS on Sat, 14 Jan 2017 07:32 | #

Meimou: He does not represent only whites. Whites will still benefit from his presidency

If you consider Jewish interests, the non-White coalitions they sponsor and the Whites who sell-out their broad EGI in order to benefit themselves narrowly, then perhaps.

Speaking of narrow and short-sighted interests which may benefit some White interests, but only narrowly and in the short term:

Scott Pruitt - The EPA fears unprecedented disaster from him.

Washington Post, 8 Dec 2016:

“Trump names Scott Pruitt, Oklahoma attorney general suing EPA on climate change, to head the EPA.”

Pruitt has spent much of his energy as attorney general fighting the very agency he is being nominated to lead.

Trump will help Whites as well? Perhaps if you consider Jews to be White. Stand with Israel? Hell, Trump’s pick for cyber-czar, Rudolph Guiliani, is set to put Israel into the nerve center of U.S. cyber defense.

Posted by Gag on the EPA on Wed, 25 Jan 2017 10:34 | #

Reports emerged on Tuesday that President Donald Trump has ordered a gag rule on the Environmental Protection Agency, barring officials from social media or interaction with reporters.

Posted by (((Alt-Right))) takes another stab at burying MR on Wed, 07 Jun 2017 01:56 | #

The Alt-Right tries to co-opt our environmental cause and place it under their retarded “inequality” rubric:

Alt-Right, “Environmentalism and the Alt Right”, 6 June 2017:

Is environmentalism just another variant of Cultural Marxism? Time to set the record straight…

Oh really? ...and why would they want to portray “THE Left” as always being about “equality” (which our White left platform is not about, but rather commensurability)....and themselves as being against that?

It’s because theirs is an asshole platform:

.....“the main difference being that the Left stands for egalitarianism, while the Right stands for the aristocratic principle of nature.”

They are helpless when, despite the behest of their Jewish masters and treacherous/naive right wing front men, they cannot pin this stereotype of “egalitarianism / equality” upon our White Left/Nationalist cause…

Posted by This tree was young when Culloden was fought on Tue, 20 Jun 2017 09:21 | #

This tree was young when the battle of Culloden was fought https://goo.gl/sBNi26

Posted by The Conservative Party Died At Culloden on Tue, 20 Jun 2017 10:37 | #

https://www.dailykos.com/story/2011/4/16/967571/-

Posted by DanielS on Tue, 20 Jun 2017 11:48 | #

Commenter #7 - “The Conservative Party Died At Culloden”

What is this bullshit?

Scotland has avoided the pitfalls of violence, and since 2007, the Scottish Government has been in the hands of the Scottish National Party. Like Plaid Cymru, the SNP has taken a stand against racism. Bashir Ahmad was the first Asian-Scots and first Muslim member of the Scottish Parliament. He was part of the leadership for the Scottish National Party.

I love that one of the most widely distributed images in Scottish politics is this one:

The Scottish Nationalists are Nationalists in name only. They don’t espouse any of the ethnocentric bile typical of traditional Nationalist groups like the BNP, or White Nationalists in the US. Indeed, the music of Scottish Nationalism is disgusted with the ethnocentric ideas that are themselves an integral part of the BNP’s British Nationalism, or its predecessor the National Front’s English Nationalism. (Thankfully, there are political groups such as the English Democrats that are working to reclaim English national identity. They fly the flag of St George, blast Jerusalem from their battle wagons, and run Sikh candidates.) The reason that Scottish Nationalism is so different from traditional nationalism is because it sets itself up in opposition to a traditional nationalist ideology that already exists. As British Nationalism favors ethnic purity, Scottish Nationalism rejects it as ludicrous. As British Nationalism relies on religion (Land of Hope and Glory, “God Save our Blessed Union!” etc.) Scottish Nationalism rejects religious dogmatism and embraces secular thought, and occasionally outright Atheism (though there are certainly religious groups who support Scottish Independence, including a significant portion of the Church of Scotland and a Majority of Scotland’s Muslims.) As British Nationalism recalls the Golden Age of the British Empire, Scotland Weeps for its role in the destruction of other nations.

Posted by Al Ross on Tue, 20 Jun 2017 12:23 | #

The clue to the actuality is , regardless of current Marxist fashions, Scotland has the convincing potential to be a country for Scots. I think we are about 92% there. The Culloden reference was included purely for conservative cognoscenti regardless of polls.