Why Hitler hated Jews

Posted by jonjayray on Saturday, 25 June 2005 00:11.

Hitler was wrong about the Jews but why he thought what he did is only a mystery if you want it to be

How do we explain Hitler’s attitudes towards the Jews?  Dietrich (1988) studied Hitler’s antisemitism at great length and concluded that Hitler’s antisemitism was only a minor part of his popular appeal to Germans.  One reason why that was so is the important but seldom stressed fact that there was nothing at all odd or unusual about a dislike of Jews almost anywhere in the world of the 1930s.  Hitler was to a considerable degree simply voicing the conventional wisdom of his times and he was far from alone in doing so.  The plain fact is that it was not just the Nazis who brought about the holocaust.  To its shame, the whole world did.  That part of the world under Hitler’s control in general willingly assisted in rounding up Jews while the rest of the world refused to take Jewish refugees who tried to escape —just as the world would later refuse many Vietnamese and Cambodian refugees and will in due course refuse to take other would-be refugees from other places.  Racial affect is now recognized as universal in psychology textbooks (Brown, 1986) and Anti-Semitism is, sad to say, an old and widely popular European tradition.  There seems to be considerable truth in the view that the Nazis just applied German thoroughness to it. 

Nonetheless, Hitler was undoubtedly more than usually obsessed by the Jews.  What made him so obsessed?  What in particular made him BECOME antisemitic?  Mein Kampf is unreliable as objective history but there can be little doubt that it is good psychological history—i.e. it records Hitler’s own history as he saw it. And what he says there is that in Linz—where he grew up—there were few Jews and he saw them at that time as no different from other Germans. So when he moved to Vienna he was horrified at the antisemitism of much of the Viennese press. As he says in Mein Kampf:

“For the Jew was still characterized for me by nothing but his religion, and therefore, on grounds of human tolerance, I maintained my rejection of religious attacks in this case as in others. Consequently, the tone, particularly that of the Viennese anti-Semitic press, seemed to me unworthy of the cultural tradition of a great nation”.

That’s a pretty odd beginning for the man who became history’s biggest antisemite, is it not?  So there must have been a powerful force to bring about such a radical change.  And the force concerned was nothing other than the “love” relationship that existed   between Hitler and most of the Germans under his rule.  As any reader of Mein Kampf should be aware, the book is largely a love-song to the German people.  And that most Germans eventually returned that love is rather vividly borne out by the way they stuck with Hitler to the bitter end—long after it was at all reasonable to do so.  Compare Germany 1945 with the unrest in Germany prior to the 1918 surrender, the collapse in resistance in Western Russia and Ukraine in the first year of the German invasion, the collapse of Dutch, Belgian, Danish, Norwegian, Czech and French resistance under German invasion or the collapse of Italian resistance under Allied invasion.

Both Roberts (1938) and Heiden (1939)—prewar anti-Nazi writers— portray Hitler as widely revered and popular among the Germans of their day.  As Heiden (1939, p. 98) put it:  “The great masses of the people did not merely put up with National Socialism.  They welcomed it”.  And Madden (1987) presents modern-day scholarly evidence derived from archival research to show that Nazis came from all social classes in large numbers.

That Hitler’s constantly expressed love of his people and belief in their greatness should have earned him their love and belief in return is not at all surprising but it is very unfashionable to mention it.  A book recently released in Germany, however,  does make some allusion to it.  Excerpt from a review of it:

“A well-respected German historian has a radical new theory to explain a nagging question: Why did average Germans so heartily support the Nazis and Third Reich? Hitler, says Goetz Aly, was a “feel good dictator,” a leader who not only made Germans feel important, but also made sure they were well cared-for by the state.  To do so, he gave them huge tax breaks and introduced social benefits that even today anchor the society. He also ensured that even in the last days of the war not a single German went hungry. Despite near-constant warfare, never once during his 12 years in power did Hitler raise taxes for working class people. He also—in great contrast to World War I—particularly pampered soldiers and their families, offering them more than double the salaries and benefits that American and British families received. As such, most Germans saw Nazism as a “warm-hearted” protector, says Aly, author of the new book “Hitler’s People’s State: Robbery, Racial War and National Socialism” and currently a guest lecturer at the University of Frankfurt”

I am inclined to the view that Hitler’s love for his fellow Germans was sincere but, whether or not that was so, there was one huge problem with it—Germans at the start of Hitler’s political career immediately after World War I were at one-another’s throats. A civil war between the “Reds” and other Germans was a very lively possibility at the time.  How could you love a people who hated one-another?  How could you love a people who were NOT one people in important senses?  That was a major dilemma that Hitler had to solve.  And we see from Mein Kampf how he solved it:

Although he was, like most German second-rate thinkers of his time, much influenced by the ideas of   Marx and Engels,  Hitler despised the destructive and divisive “class war” aspect of Marx’s thinking and when he found that practically every preacher of Marxist class-war that he encountered in Vienna was a Jew, he began to see Jews as bent on the destruction of the German people he loved.  So the great divisions that he saw among Germans in the anarchic conditions immediately after World War I could now be explained satisfactorily:  They were the work of non-Germans—Jews.  It was Jews who were creating divisions among Germans by their preaching of class war.  Germans were only divided because they were being deceived by outsiders.  Jews were the scapegoat for German disunity just as they have been the scapegoat for many other problems throughout history.  And it may be noted that Hitler describes his conversion to antisemitism as “a great spiritual upheaval”—i.e. he abandoned his previous “cosmopolitan” (tolerant) views only with great reluctance.  It was only his romantic love of his semi-imaginary German people (Volk) that brought about the big shift in his views.

In a speech delivered at the Berlin Sportpalast  shortly after being appointed Chancellor on February, 1st, 1933, Hitler summed up his thinking about his German Volk with his characteristic passion as follows:

“During fourteen years the German nation has been at the mercy of decadent elements which have abused its confidence. During fourteen years those elements have done nothing but destroy, disintegrate and dissolve. Hence it is neither temerity nor presumption if, appearing before the nation today, I ask: German nation, give us four years time, after which you can arraign us before your tribunal and you can judge me! ....

“I cannot rid myself of my faith in my people, nor lose the conviction that this people will resuscitate again one day. I cannot be severed from the love of a people that I know to be my own. And I nourish the conviction that the hour will come when millions of men who now curse us will take their stand behind us to welcome the new Reich, our common creation born of a painful and laborious struggle and an arduous triumph—a Reich which is the symbol of greatness, honour, strength, honesty and justice.”

His love of his German people and his belief that they had been misled are certainly eloquently proclaimed there —and by that stage no-one doubted whom he saw as the “decadent elements”.

Sadly, however,  Hitler’s anti-Jewish views actually made him unremarkable in the Germany of his day The general acquiescence in them needs no great explanation beyond a reference to the general attitudes of the times.  As far as the average German knew, Hitler was just running (yawn) a Pogrom.  The Russians did it all the time, didn’t they?  It was Hitler’s national glorification and socialist policies that were really interesting and attractive.

The conventional account of the origins of Hitler’s animosity towards Jews is that his rejection from the Vienna Art Academy (in which Jews were prominent) embittered him. But that is not remotely what he says in Mein Kampf. He does not even mention the word “Jew” in connection with the Academy. He says that the Rector rejected him from the painting school because his main talent and interest was in architecture—a judgement with which Hitler emphatically agreed!

Finally, it might be noted that much of Hitler’s rhetoric about the Jews was based on exactly the same assumption that Leftists to this day use in talking about racial matters.  The affirmative action warriors of today are fanatical about proportional representation.  They constantly claim that the proportion of (say) blacks in the general population should be reflected everywhere—in every occupation and in every institution.  If there is a smaller proportion of (say) blacks in banking than there is in the general population, this is taken as proof that there is discrimination against blacks in banking.  Hitler used exactly the same argument about Jews.  As they are in America today, Jews in prewar Germany were very much overrepresented in the top echelons of German society.  So, in good Leftist fashion, Hitler took that as proof that good, ordinary Germans were being systematically excluded from such positions in society by malign Jewish machinations.  If Hitler was illogical in such thinking, so are most Leftists today.  And in fact complaints about Jewish over-representation in (say) top U.S. universities do rumble on at a low level among Leftists today.  “The more things change, the more they stay the same”.


Brown, R.(1986) Social psychology (2nd. Ed.) N.Y.: Free Press. Harper
Dietrich, D.J. (1988) National renewal, anti-Semitism, and political continuity: A psychological assessment. Political Psychology 9, 385-411.
Heiden, K. (1939) One man against Europe  Harmondsworth, Mddx.: Penguin
Madden, P. (1987) The social class origins of Nazi party members as determined by occupations, 1919-1933. Social Science Quarterly  68, 263-280.
Roberts, S.H. (1938) The house that Hitler built  N.Y.: Harper. 




Posted by Geoff Beck on Sat, 25 Jun 2005 00:57 | #

Hitler… again.


Posted by John S Bolton on Sat, 25 Jun 2005 01:47 | #

That is a good point, how overrepresentation comes to be seen by leftist egalitarians as proving conspiracy. The most antisemitic groups in America are the blacks and latinos, who are the targets of affirmative action programs.


Posted by ummjack on Sat, 25 Jun 2005 03:06 | #

Obviously this is the tack going to be taken by the next dictator - possibly Howard Dean? - against American Christians.  You can already see this rhetoric all over the “Christian left -” the idea that America is a great nation and Americans are great people, but there’s this terrible, divisive, disintegrating force preventing us from acheiving our glory - religious fundamentalism.


Posted by Guessedworker on Sat, 25 Jun 2005 08:16 | #

I don’t believe Hitler scapegoated Jews for German disunity or hated them for being successful, or even for practising ethnic nepotism in the pursuit of success.  Why would he be concerned that Jews were over-represented in the upper echelons of German society if their effect upon Germans was beneficial ?  It wasn’t - that was the problem.  Jews were perceived to use their power for their own historic purposes ... and these were perceived to constitute an act of ancient, unremitting ethnic warfare.

Did they not, for example, concentrate in centres of strategic importance: the centres of control of money and information and discordant political activism?  Did they not solely initiate or support political activism that furthered what was “good for Jews”?  Did that activism invariably degrade German majority interests?

We have just witnessed the long-delayed trial and prosecution of an octagenarian white American racist for the murders of two young, committed Jewish communists and a black stooge.  I do not believe that in the minds of the perpetrators those murders were acts of aggression.  The murderers were not interested in travelling to New York to bomb kosher restaurants.  They acted in the perception of their own defence.

The key to understanding anti-semitic activism among peoples of European blood was and is self-defence.  Whether there is an attack to which to respond is a matter for open debate, as is whether the nature of the response is reasonable.

Hitlerism was clearly not reasonable - not merely because of the Jews and the camps but because of its impact on neighbouring European peoples.  Under Nazism, the Germans as a people travelled so far towards self-glorification that they responded to all competing ethnic interests, Jewish or otherwise, aggressive or not, with the same arrogant, contemptuous cruelty.


Posted by Phil on Sat, 25 Jun 2005 10:28 | #


I agree with that 100%.


Posted by Geoff Beck on Sat, 25 Jun 2005 15:45 | #

And, it certainly had nothing to to the the Bolsheviks - a predominantly Jewish radical movement - overthrowing the Tsar and turning Russia into a prison camp.


Posted by Geoff M. Beck on Sat, 25 Jun 2005 16:18 | #

And it had nothing to do with Bela Khun/Kun/Kohn overthrowing the gov’t of Hungary(1919).

Hungary being part of the Hapsburg domains, of which Austria was then a part when she went into WWI and which Hitler served.

No, concrete reasons like this… they couldn’t explain it…. lets look for some abstract deep psychological fault.

Did his mother give him enough milk?


Posted by Phil on Sat, 25 Jun 2005 16:35 | #

Did his mother give him enough milk?



Posted by Stuka on Sat, 25 Jun 2005 16:47 | #

What’s with this Hitler Obsession? :::yawn:::


Posted by friedrich braun on Sat, 25 Jun 2005 17:21 | #

“Although he was, like most German second-rate thinkers of his time, much influenced by the ideas of Marx and Engels…”

“second-rate” compared to whom? Ronald Reagan, George W. Bush, Tony Blair, Jacques Chirac, etc.? lol Surely he was light years ahead of that mediocre company. Can you imagine Reagan, for e.g., give frequent speeches on art and architecture to his fellow Americans? Just the thought makes me smile.

The same man who as a teenager preferred to buy tickets to the opera rather than eat? Someone who could expound on philosophy, music, religion, art, history, architecture, the classics… for hours? The same man who wrote an opera (“Wieland der Schmied”) when still an adolescent?

It makes no sense to compare politicians with writers, philosophers, poets, artists, etc. but I’d say Hitler, in terms of his wide interests and intellectual curiosity, was far above your average pol.

Here’s a good review by Matt Nuenke of a book that claims Hitler was in fact an Enlightment philosphe and a profound thinker.



Posted by Phil on Sat, 25 Jun 2005 17:56 | #


There is something surreal about your Hitler-worship. I have yet to meet any Germans (and I know many) who speak this way about Hitler or the Nazis. And mind you, most of my German acquiantances are not loonie-left Liberals. Most of them are pretty conservative (and many are very conservative Bavarians). Almost all of them are completely opposed to all immigration into Germany.

But I have seen this bizarre tendency among some American “White Nationalsts” (with a modicum of German ancestry) who take on the cause of the Third Reich with a fervour not seen since the days of the Nuremberg rallies.

What gives?


Posted by Phil on Sat, 25 Jun 2005 18:06 | #


Does it ever occur to you that open admiration for Hitler does more harm than good (leaving aside for the moment historical analysis of the Third Reich on which I am willing to concede that views would not be uniform)?

There is no shortage of “far right” American “white nationalists” who have been swinging Swasikas for decades. And they wouldnt be able to win an election for the local dog warden if they decided to contest tomorrow. It never occured to them that their Nazi symbolism may itself be the real reason why they don’t succeed.


Posted by ben tillman on Sat, 25 Jun 2005 19:33 | #

The murderers were not interested in travelling to New York to bomb kosher restaurants.  They acted in the perception of their own defence.

The key to understanding anti-semitic activism among peoples of European blood was and is self-defence.

Yes, defense against aggression.

From etymonline.com:

Aggression - 1611, “unprovoked attack,” from verb aggress “to approach, to start an argument” (c.1575), from Fr. aggresser, from L.L. aggressare, freq. of L. aggredi (pp. aggressus) “to approach, attack,” from ad- “to” + gradi (pp. gressus) “to step,” from gradus “a step.” Psychological sense of “hostile or destructive behavior” first recorded 1912 in A.A. Brill’s transl. of Freud. Aggressive first recorded 1824.

Throughout history, it has been the Jewish community that “approach[es]” or takes a step toward gentile communities, rather than the reverse.  It is a matter of “breaking down barriers” to entry - barriers to entry of golf clubs, universities, or entire nations. 

Heinrich Graetz, a renowned Jewish historian, discusses the longing of the Jewish community to gain entry to Britain:


At the very time when the Jews of Poland were trodden down, slaughtered, or driven through Europe like terrified wild beasts, a land of freedom was opened, from which the Jews had been banished for more than three centuries and a half.  England, which the wise queen Elizabeth and the brave Cromwell had raised to be the first power in Europe, a position very different from that of crumbling Poland, again admitted Jews, not indeed through the great portal, yet through the back door.  But this admission was so bruited abroad, that it was like a triumph for Judaism.  The Jews of Amsterdam and Hamburg looked with longing to this island, to which they were so near, with whose merchants, shipowners, and scholars they were in connection, and which promised wide scope for the exercise of their varied abilities.  But settlement there seemed beset with insuperable obstacles.  The English episcopal church, which exercised sway over the English conscience, was even more intolerant than the popery which it persecuted,  Not grantlng freedom to Catholics and Dissenters, would it tolerate the descendants of those aspersed in the New Testament? The English people, who for centuries had seen no Jew, shared to the full the antipathy of the clergy.  To them every Jew was a Shylock, who, with hearty goodwill, would cut a Christian to pieces—a monster in human form, bearing the mark of Cain. Who would undertake to banish this strong prejudice in order to render people and rulers favorable to the descendants of Israel?


Posted by Kubilai on Sat, 25 Jun 2005 19:38 | #

Does it ever occur to you that open admiration for Hitler does more harm than good - Phil

You know, this subject really bothers me.  While I am an avid and bordering psycho White proponent, I am quite disturbed at the not so inconsequential numbers of youth (and old) who are Neo-nazis and Hitlerphiles.  Now, I do find Hitler and the Nazis extremely interesting from a historical perspective and love reading about WWII, though I do not pretend to be anything remotely resembling an expert on the subject.  I also am quite aware that many of the Neo-nazis have gravitated to this belief due to a lack of racial awareness by Whites in general, constant attack on Whites from all sides, the JQ issues, and the more visible presence of an ideology that supposedly champions their beliefs and viewing Hitler as a man who stood up for Whites and therefore a “hero”.  I can understand ALL that and cannot really blame them for wanting to fit into a group or family due to a paucity of avenues to turn to. 

With all that said, what I am bothered with is that Hitler damaged Whites and our interests more than any damn Liberal could.  He damaged more Europeans than Jews.  His existence allowed this crazy Marxist ideology to take hold so “there won’t be another Hitler” thanks to his insanity.  With the Marxists running the show, the likelihood of another “Hitler” grows due to this constant attack on us.  If that were to happen, that would be the end for us, collectively.  It would destroy all that is good of Whites and Europeans.  We do not NEED nor WANT another Hitler or a rise in Neo-Nazi ideology.  I say that with full sympathy of freidrich’s beliefs in racial awareness and pride, though I stand firm that if he and others that frequent his site do not come to the realization that they do more harm to our cause than good, they may be 1) bringing about our extinction sooner rather than later, 2) are possibly used as “fringe pawns” in the Marxist media machine, and 3) turn off possible awakening in people who are sympathetic to our cause though cringe at the mere site of a swastika.

The growing numbers of this ideology is very worrisome and the only thing that may temper it is racial awareness from more moderate voices that stick to two critical points: 1) Whites are a race that deserves all the respect and rights that others are freely given.  2) Whites have the absolute and unquestionable right to preserve their homelands.


Posted by friedrich braun on Sat, 25 Jun 2005 20:02 | #

One more think: Hitler was never influenced by Marx and Engels. However, he was influenced by Prussian or authoritarian Socialism. He translated this thesis into a “Socialism of action.” Socialism meaning comradeship, service, duty, and love of your Volk rather than the class struggle of Karl Marx.


Posted by seelow heights on Sat, 25 Jun 2005 22:31 | #

I think a lot of neo-nazism in the US is simply an unthinking visceral reaction to the current regime. Since the regime has defined itself as the antithesis of Hitlerism for the past seventy years those who feel justified revulsion toward that regime find AH attractive for that very reason.


Posted by Svigor on Sat, 25 Jun 2005 23:07 | #

But I have seen this bizarre tendency among some American “White Nationalsts” (with a modicum of German ancestry) who take on the cause of the Third Reich with a fervour not seen since the days of the Nuremberg rallies.

What gives?

That’s what I find amusing, that it’s usually non-German (especially American) WNs giving WNism a bad name with the Hitler-worship.

Hitler’s National Socialism was strictly German, so I don’t understand why non-Germans are so into it (apart from anti-social tendencies of course).


Posted by Svigor on Sat, 25 Jun 2005 23:10 | #

There is no shortage of “far right” American “white nationalists” who have been swinging Swasikas for decades. And they wouldnt be able to win an election for the local dog warden if they decided to contest tomorrow. It never occured to them that their Nazi symbolism may itself be the real reason why they don’t succeed.

There is no repeat no excuse for non-German WNs using Nazi symbology.  In my opinion those doing so are fifth columnists or their extended phenotypes, or simple wackos.


Posted by Svigor on Sat, 25 Jun 2005 23:33 | #

I think a lot of neo-nazism in the US is simply an unthinking visceral reaction to the current regime. Since the regime has defined itself as the antithesis of Hitlerism for the past seventy years those who feel justified revulsion toward that regime find AH attractive for that very reason.

I think you’re right, though I think anti-social personality plays a bigger part (not that the two are easily separable).


Posted by Svigor on Sat, 25 Jun 2005 23:38 | #

I’ve had a few heated discussions over the use of Nazi symbology, and the experiences have only strengthened my belief that these people are kooks who won’t listen to reason.  Even the simplest sorts of logical arguments are beyond them.


Posted by Phil on Sun, 26 Jun 2005 00:15 | #

I think a lot of neo-nazism in the US is simply an unthinking visceral reaction to the current regime. Since the regime has defined itself as the antithesis of Hitlerism for the past seventy years those who feel justified revulsion toward that regime find AH attractive for that very reason.

You have nailed it.


Posted by jonjayray on Sun, 26 Jun 2005 01:44 | #

“I think a lot of neo-nazism in the US is simply an unthinking visceral reaction to the current regime. Since the regime has defined itself as the antithesis of Hitlerism for the past seventy years those who feel justified revulsion toward that regime find AH attractive for that very reason”

There is much truth in that.  Extremism begets extremism


Posted by jonjayray on Sun, 26 Jun 2005 02:05 | #

For Friedrich:

“Hitler often praised Stalin in conversation. “The whole of National Socialism,” he once confessed to a confidant, was based on Marx.



Posted by jonjayray on Sun, 26 Jun 2005 02:09 | #

““second-rate” compared to whom? Ronald Reagan, George W. Bush, Tony Blair”

Ronald Reagan had a degree in economics and knew the less recognized “Austrian” economists well

GWB has a Masters degree from Harvard

Blair is a clever British lawyer

Hitler never went anywhere near a university and did badly at school


Posted by Phil on Sun, 26 Jun 2005 09:34 | #

Ronald Reagan had a degree in economics and knew the less recognized “Austrian” economists well

GWB has a Masters degree from Harvard

Blair is a clever British lawyer

Any reason why you left Chirac out? smile


Posted by Guessedworker on Sun, 26 Jun 2005 18:57 | #

Because he’s French?


Posted by friedrich braun on Sun, 26 Jun 2005 22:37 | #

“Hitler often praised Stalin in conversation. “The whole of National Socialism,” he once confessed to a confidant, was based on Marx.


LOL is this serious? Don’t give me garbage off the Internet.

Date, source, name of the “confidant”? Aren’t you supposed to be some sort of academic? That’s just ridiculous.


Posted by friedrich braun on Sun, 26 Jun 2005 22:45 | #

“Does it ever occur to you that open admiration for Hitler…”

There has never been in world history any one more lied about, calumniated, caricatured, and misrepresented than Adolf Hitler and the years of the Third Reich. About 2/3 of the stuff you read is tendentious, slanted junk. Worthless. I only try to set the record straight when I can, the fact that you call that “admiration” speaks of your conditioning—and I’m not blaming you, it’s hard not to be a victim whem for close to 70 years now only one side has been allowed to speak.


Posted by friedrich braun on Sun, 26 Jun 2005 22:53 | #

“But I have seen this bizarre tendency among some American “White Nationalsts” (with a modicum of German ancestry) who take on the cause of the Third Reich with a fervour not seen since the days of the Nuremberg rallies.”

I’m not an American and I can’t speak for Americans. I also happen to think that Americans WNs spend too much time on Hitler, etc. Americans should reach within their own rich past and traditions and concentrate on problems facing Whites in America today, instead of focusing on a German movement of the 20’s and 30’s that arose in Germany to tackle specificly Germans problems of that era.


Posted by friedrich braun on Sun, 26 Jun 2005 22:56 | #

There is something surreal about your “Hitler-worship. I have yet to meet any Germans (and I know many) who speak this way about Hitler or the Nazis. And mind you, most of my German acquiantances are not loonie-left Liberals. Most of them are pretty conservative (and many are very conservative Bavarians). Almost all of them are completely opposed to all immigration into Germany.”

Quick point:

It’s rather difficult to overtly express positive thoughts on Hitler, NS years, and the like in today’s anti-German Bastardstate with its Yankee-installed judeo-democracy when doing so guarantees you a one-way ticket to a nearby prison.


Posted by JB on Mon, 27 Jun 2005 09:16 | #

“Hitler never went anywhere near a university and did badly at school”

No PhD - clearly an idiot

“As they are in America today, Jews in prewar Germany were very much overrepresented in the top echelons of German society.”

yes, more details on this page:



Posted by friedrich braun on Mon, 27 Jun 2005 12:59 | #

The mere fact that Hitler would credit Marx and Marxism as forming the base of National Socialism is wacky in an insane kind of way. But when it comes to Hitler any lie, no matter how absurd and laughable, gets printed without a discordant note. As long as it’s liable to show him in the most unfavourable light possible of course.


Posted by JB on Mon, 27 Jun 2005 14:39 | #

How does John Ray explains the overrepresentation of jews in the top echelons of the american media ? A coincidence ? A sign of superior intelligence or talent ?




Posted by Phil on Mon, 27 Jun 2005 20:19 | #

There has never been in world history any one more lied about, calumniated, caricatured, and misrepresented than Adolf Hitler and the years of the Third Reich. About 2/3 of the stuff you read is tendentious, slanted junk. Worthless. I only try to set the record straight when I can, the fact that you call that “admiration” speaks of your conditioning—and I’m not blaming you, it’s hard not to be a victim whem for close to 70 years now only one side has been allowed to speak.


Are they lies or simply moral condemnations of acts which you do not consider morally reprehensible (because you accept the idea that morality itself is a luxury - a product of Nazi nihilism) - such as the Nazi slaughter of Poles, Russians and Ukrainians (to name a few)?

I raise this objection as someone who doesn’t agree with John Ray most of the time. If you browse through this site, you should be able to gather that most commenters do not agree with John most of the time.

That said, it is an argument that I often encounter among those with Nazi sympathies - that the history of Nazi Germany is all lies. No nation’s history is without some lies - seeing the way the history of the British empire has been altered by Marxists to suit their own interests.

BUT, when you accuse the history of Nazi Germany as we know it to be based on lies, merely asserting that they were lies is not enough. You need to set out what those lies are. I understand that you could fill a book with it (in your opinion) - but even a brief summary of the main points will do (and with good links please - not internet kooks).


Posted by Phil on Mon, 27 Jun 2005 20:24 | #

No PhD - clearly an idiot

Deal with the arguments. Don’t engage in personal attacks.

I have warned commenters in the past about this. Without exception, anyone throwing insults at our bloggers will be banned.

We are a Free Speech forum, not a free for all. You can express disagreements in the strongest possible terms but you will not engage in insults or abuse.

If you cannot post civil comments, go blog somewhere else.


Posted by Phil on Mon, 27 Jun 2005 20:30 | #

There has never been in world history any one more lied about, calumniated, caricatured, and misrepresented than Adolf Hitler and the years of the Third Reich. About 2/3 of the stuff you read is tendentious, slanted junk. Worthless. I only try to set the record straight when I can, the fact that you call that “admiration” speaks of your conditioning—and I’m not blaming you, it’s hard not to be a victim whem for close to 70 years now only one side has been allowed to speak.

Even if this is true, it makes zero sense for American WNs or European Nationalists to try to save Hitler’s neck in the history books when their own political causes are fraught with all kinds of problems.

Trying to straighten the Nazi record is a lost cause and even if every Nazi evil we have read about is a lie, it is a waste of time for us to expend our energies on trying to rectify the history books when we are in such a crisis for survival in Europe.

From a political perspective, any association with Nazis is worse than suicide. It amounts to voluntary political obliteration. Anyone who doesn’t understand this is either dense or a sworn enemy of European survival.


Posted by friedrich braun on Mon, 27 Jun 2005 23:16 | #

LOL Phil!

First you tell me that setting the record straight is a waste of time and counterproductive and then you ask me to do just that—with good links!


May I suggest some reading material:

David Leslie Hoggan’s The Forced War: Why Peaceful Revision Failed.


It’s out of print but every good library has it and you can get from second hand bookstores. I don’t know of a better source concerning the events that lead to W.W. II.

I’d start with the beginning, i.e. how come there was a war at all and then move to various issues surrounding the actual war.

For e.g., did you know that Russian historians increasingly believe (thanks to old secret files being opened) that Stalin wanted to attack Hitler first and that the Russian campaign (Barbarossa) was in fact a pre-emptive strike?

At any rate, if you really mean to get informed, please start with Hoggan.


Posted by Phil on Tue, 28 Jun 2005 09:14 | #

First you tell me that setting the record straight is a waste of time and counterproductive and then you ask me to do just that—with good links!

Because you claimed that 2/3rds of the History of Nazi Germany (as we know it) is false. If you make a claim, the onus is on you to prove it.

But as a practical matter (even assuming your argument is correct - which I don’t), what I said earlier stands. It amounts to voluntary obliteration for any European Nationalist to associate himself in the slightest way with Hitler.

We don’t live in a perfect world. We cannot right every wrong. There were wrongs committed by the opponents of Nazi Germany too. Which is why, you need to get your priotities in the right order. What matters more than what German kids in 2100 will think of Hitler, is whether Germany survives at all.

Germany can survive if there is a resurgence of strong conservative spirit and sentiment which puts an end to the immigration mess.


Posted by friedrich braun on Tue, 28 Jun 2005 11:04 | #

“(even assuming your argument is correct - which I don’t)”

Always keep an open mind, Phil.

Reading you I have the feeling that you haven’t done your homework at all on those issues but you’re just going along with the psychologically comfortable received wisdom you picked up here and there from conformist historians.

Additionally, I reject your contention that we shouldn’t strive for historical accuracy when the Third Reich is at play because it might ruffle some feathers. It’s precisely that type of obscurantist attitude (incidentally, I don’t think you’d be advocating ignorance as a tactic in any other field) that has prevailed for the last 60 years and has contributed to a distorted and one-sided, black and white, Manichean view of history.

Pick up Hoggan’s book, I think that should be a good and start. It’s really a mesmorizing read. Take a week or two to read it, it’s really worth it. Make that effort, challenge your pre-conceived notions. It’s really worth it.

Finally, browse some threads on The Revisionist Forum, a place where sacred cows get slaughetered on a regular basis. See holocaust promoters (and other guardians of orthodoxy) and revisionists go head to head and decide on your own - for yourself - who has science and facts on their side.



Posted by Phil on Tue, 28 Jun 2005 19:53 | #

Reading you I have the feeling that you haven’t done your homework at all on those issues but you’re just going along with the psychologically comfortable received wisdom you picked up here and there from conformist historians.

I keep an open mind about everything. This includes the Holocaust on which I have expressed my own agnostic opinions before on this very forum.

Its not a matter of having a closed mind. Its a matter of contemporary politics. No political party in Europe will get a second look from the undecided voter if it identifies itself with Nazis. That’s just the way it is. You can’t change that. And we are running out of time.

I am all for revisionist historians refuting lies propounded by Marxists and their fellow travellers. And I am fine with people in our “cause” loosely defined, listening to Revisionists and being open to their arguments.

But what I wont ever agree to is having WN parties identifying with Nazis. Thats political suicide. Let the Historians do their work and good luck to them. We have to do our work.

My first concern is with the survival of Europe. I dont give a fig about revisionist History if theres no Europe left in five decades for my prospective grandchildren to grow up in. And it is my responsibility and that of all Europeans to avert such an eventuality. Openly identifying with Nazis compromises that very badly.


Posted by srsrenner on Tue, 28 Jun 2005 20:48 | #

There is no shortage of “far right” American “white nationalists” who have been swinging Swasikas for decades. And they wouldnt be able to win an election for the local dog warden if they decided to contest tomorrow.

We don’t call it “dog warden” here, we say “dog catcher.”


Posted by friedrich braun on Tue, 28 Jun 2005 21:16 | #

Phil, I agree with your last post. No one sane entering politics should openly identify with Nazis.

However, if downplaying the Jewish question and denigrating Nazis were the road to power, the American paleo-cons would have triumphed a decade ago. One only needs to read Thomas Fleming and Chronicles magazine to understand the futility of this position.


Posted by friedrich braun on Tue, 28 Jun 2005 21:31 | #

Anyone who accepts uncritically, and who regurgitates approvingly, the hagiography of men like FDR and Churchill, and who mindlessly repeats the court historian’s lies about WWI and WWII, and who touts the entire Anglo-American historical mythos as though it were self-evidently true, is an enemy (or at least too seriously deluded to be a friend or ally) and is part of the problem, not part of the solution.

It’s one thing to say that the Nazi-cultism is unhelpful to our cause and that “blame-the-Jews-for-everything” mentality that finds a Jew under every bed, is not going to help us much in solving our ultimate problems. This is true. Most of us here would agree with that.

It’s quite another thing entirely to then go on to say, that because of this, we have to appeal to the ignorance of the masses by pretending that the lies of the official court historians are true, and that we must denounce anyone who disagrees with these historical lies as “Nazis”, “Hitler worshippers”, etc.

There’s a middle way in which we can avoid such pointless things as Hollywood Nazi uniform fetishes, without however accepting the anti-Nazi lies we have been force fed by the media and academia. People need to be educated as to the facts, otherwise the “solutions” they will attempt to implement will be based on false assumptions about the facts, and thus, will repeatedly fail and come to naught.

Some put themselves in an entirely ridiculous bind: he wants to accept the Anglo-American-Jewish worldview about the history of the 20th century, and yet also claim to recognize the Jews as incompatible with Western culture, and thus in need of removal from our midst.

That’s absurd. Why are the Jews incompatible? You can’t just criticize Jewish behaviour internally (that is, their bad influence on our culture) without also taking note of their disasterous influence over our foreign policy. It’s too absurd for words. WNs either have to come on board all the way, take the red pill, and recognize reality for what it is, or they have to make their peace with the Jews and take the blue pill, and get on with his life as a willing tool of the System.

This is one instance where there is no third way, where People simply can’t hedge, niggle, wiggle, or finagle their way out of this dilemma. Sometimes there is a third way, sometimes there are more than two choices, where saying there are only two choices constitutes a “false dichotomy”; but this is not one of them. It’s either the red pill or the blue pill, folks; no other choices.


Posted by Phil on Tue, 28 Jun 2005 22:16 | #


There is no way to wash over the Nazis as heroes or as reasonable men no matter how many of these lies you refute (and there are many, no doubt - starting with some elements of the Holocaust story itself).

But even if 2/3rds of what we know about Nazi Germany is proved to be false (which would be impossible), that still leaves a lot to answer for.

One doesn’t even need to go through the entire history of the Third Reich to see that. A read through Mein Kampf is enough to provide a window into it.

My family lost several members in WWII (although I was born in the 70s and never saw the carnage myself). For those in my family who fought WWII, it was a matter of national survival. A fight against an all-conquering enemy. I do not need historians to tell me what things were like in 1940. Part of that story is etched in our family history.

But anyway, you won’t convince me and I won’t convince you. So let’s leave it at that. All I can say is this: we are not a revisionist forum. We are a political forum. We are here to reach out to the undecided conservatives. The people who vote for Bush in America, for John Howard in Britain. Our goal is to convince them of the justice of our cause. That goal takes precedence over everything else. And revisionism or open advocacy in favour of the Nazis damages it badly.

We are a young blog but we have grown by leaps and bounds in a very short time. We do, though, have a long way to go yet. We are hopeful that we will reach out to enough people, through the spread of ideas and through our commitment to make a difference politically.

We have no illusions about the enormity of our task. But we are prepared for it. 


This is a complicated question. Why have the Paleos fared badly in America? I don’t know the answer to that but what I do know is that they have done better than the National Vanguard or other similar types.

William Pierce (the founder of National vanguard) was saying all those things (that you want European Nationalists to say) since the 1960s. Where did that take him and his group? Nowhere.

Jews are the engine of Liberalism (in the US mainly) but not the soul of Liberalism. And I will tell you this: you could remove all Jewish influence from the West right now and that would solve about 20 percent of our problems (if that). Liberalism and Liberal principles have etched themselves into the soul of western man and this is a process that began a long time ago.

The Yankees needed no Jews to invade the South and murder hundreds of thousands of their own kin in the name of abolishing slavery. Why did they do it? In much of Europe in our time, Jewish influence is minimal and yet the progressive agenda marches on.

Blaming the Jews for everything (which your post suggests you disagree with too) is a sign of intellectual laziness, an unwillingness to think harder about what has gone wrong. There are no easy “solutions” here. The structure of society has been wrecked. Family is wrecked, religion is wrecked. These things cannot be easily repaired.

Even after we have succeeded in turning the immigrant tide (and let’s hope we do), we will have a long way to go before we can restore the West and reclaim what we have lost.


Posted by Phil on Tue, 28 Jun 2005 22:37 | #


I should add one more thing:

It makes little sense for us to repeatedly say that we are not a revisionism site when John keeps churning out his own WWII material at a rate that would leave the Chinese impressed.

I have argued with John before. However, I do not have unlimited time as he does (nor do any of the other bloggers here). And all John usually does is repeat the same argument a thousand times over no matter how often it has been refuted. Basically, if you repeat something (true or false) often enough - it sticks.

I would personally not have repeated posts on Hitler or the Nazis because it is then logical for many to question the view that he supports. But it is for John to exercise his discretion in doing so as I cannot control what he writes.

But, it is an open question as to whether his intention is to maintain the reputation and focus of the blog or simply ignite a lot of controversy to enjoy it himself.


Posted by friedrich braun on Tue, 28 Jun 2005 23:06 | #

“My family lost several members in WWII (although I was born in the 70s and never saw the carnage myself). For those in my family who fought WWII, it was a matter of national survival. A fight against an all-conquering enemy. I do not need historians to tell me what things were like in 1940. Part of that story is etched in our family history.”

Quick note on this:

Germany didn’t war with Britain, Britain wanted war with Germany in the name of the antqiquated balance of power policy that was obsolete even then. It was Britain that gave the dissolute, arrogant sabre-rattling Polish colonels (Poland was a military dictatorship in the 20s and 30s—so much for another myth about going to war in the name of freedom and democracy) of the 20s and 30s a blank cheque in the form of guarantees against Germany without even asking them to negotiate with Germany in good faith over Danzing (as amazing as it sounds, Britain didn’t attach any conditions to those guarantees and didn’t as the Poles to be reasonable), but only against Germany and not the Soviet Union, even though Poles regarded the Soviet Union as a greater threat to their independence (that’s also why war was declared only against Germany and not the Soviet Union as well). Actually, Lord Halifax specifically enjoined the Polish colonels in the summer of ‘39 not to negotiate with Germans over Danzig (a city that was 95 % German and National Socialist even before the Reich, the WW I Allies refused the Danzigers the principle of self-determination as specified in Wislon’s 14 points, because they knew that the Danzigers wanted to stay united with the Reich). They’re was a significant anti-German element in Britain that wanted to see Germany destroyed because, inter alia, it was an economic threat to British supremacy. I’m referring to people such as Halifax, Strang, Churchill, Vansittart and a host of others. Hitler made 5 peace offers to Britain (6 if you count the Hess flight), they were all turned down by Britain. One of Hitler’s proposals was a multi-layered alliance with Britain and a willingness to militarily guarantee the British Empire with German arms (had that occurred you can bet that Britain would have her empire to this day). What I’m driving at is that you shouldn’t blame the Germans for war between Britain and Germany and for your family’s needless sacrifice. Germany didn’t want war with Britain. What did Britain get out of that unnecessary war? Financial insolvency and the loss of empire and the consequent immigration from the said empire. Half of Europe was given to Stalin at Yalta - including Poland, who’s freedom was the pretext for war in the first place.

But to paraphrase Schmitt, sometimes you don’t get to choose your enemy, the enemy does that for you.


Posted by friedrich braun on Tue, 28 Jun 2005 23:08 | #

“But, it is an open question as to whether his intention is to maintain the reputation and focus of the blog or simply ignite a lot of controversy to enjoy it himself.”

Point taken. I don’t come here either to argue about WW II.


Posted by Phil on Tue, 28 Jun 2005 23:27 | #


You made excellent points. And every one of your points is valid.

However, the real question is this: could Hitler be trusted? This is I think the final issue. I am no expert on WWII history, so Ill leave it at that.

But if that is where the question must lie, British policy could not be faulted in its entirety.

But to paraphrase Schmitt, sometimes you don’t get to choose your enemy, the enemy does that for you.

I take it that you are paraphrasing Karl Schmitt? I have always wanted to read Schmitt but I never get around to it with my ridiculous working hours.

Now, after Germany had conquered all of Europe, even assuming Britain had not followed the policies you have critiqued, what was the guarantee with all of europe under his control, Hitler would not have invaded Britain? It is what the Yanks would call a “no brainer”. With a vastly superior military (and the Wehrmacht was man for man probably the finest army of all time) and all the advantages one needs, would Hitler have stopped in the name of principle? I think not.

War with Germany was, unfortunately, inevitable. But the War didn’t start in the late 1930s. It started in 1914. What we had after 1918 was a temporary ceasefire - a very tense ceasefire.

There is no way to give a clean chit to any of the warring parties. But on the balance of probabilities, why would Hitler simply take Britain as an “ally” if he had already taken all of Europe under his control? And if he had taken Britain as an “ally”, it would have been after an invasion and having installed a vichy-type regime in Britain.

Do you rule this out completely?


Posted by friedrich braun on Wed, 29 Jun 2005 07:45 | #

“Now, after Germany had conquered all of Europe, even assuming Britain had not followed the policies you have critiqued, what was the guarantee with all of europe under his control, Hitler would not have invaded Britain?”

Hitler wasn’t interested in conquering all of Europe or the world as you often hysterically hear. However, he was interested, as were most Germans, in revising or rectifying the unjust Versailles Diktat. Furthermore, Hitler only wanted to move East and never West. He was forced to move West when the West declared war on him. Had Britain and France didn’t see fit to be the self-appointed arbiters of Germany’s eastern borders there would’ve been no war but only a light campaign against the arrogant and sabre-rattling Polish colonels. But even that’s dubious, since without Britain’s intrigues Poland would’ve negotiated a reasonable and mutually beneficial arrangement over the German city of Danzig.

As to your hypothetical question concerning an invasion of Britain once the injustices of the Versailles Diktat were rectified. I suppose it’s possible, in the same way that it’s also possible that he might have gotten a nose ring, dyed his hair orange and joined a Kibbutz.

Again, Hitler’s expansionist policies were only aimed at the East, he never wanted Britain or the British Empire; and that’s the reason why he continuously sought peace with her. Even givig the order to Guderian et al. to hold back at Dunkirk when Germans were in hot pursuit. On numerous occasions he wanted to show his good-will toward the British, he was an Anglophile and admirer of the British Empire, he wanted the British Empire to exist in its form, he thought that it was a great thing, a stabilizing thing for the world…there’s just no evidence that he had designs on it, and the mere idea is preposterous. Nowhere does he ever state (in private and public) that he wanted Britain and her Empire. On the contrary, he viewed the prospect of foreign colonies (in Africa, Asia, etc.) as a burden and a hassle.

As to Hitler being untrustworthy, that’s also bunk. Bring up specifics, if you want, and I’ll show you that it’s Allied black propaganda at work.


Posted by rustymason on Thu, 11 May 2006 13:35 | #

“poo ... wee”  At first, I thought this was spam.  However, after careful consideration of your and JJR’s posts, I think you have given his the consideration it deserves.  Well don.


Posted by James on Tue, 21 Nov 2006 21:47 | #

Hitler was right!Germany was in ruins ,the economy was destroyed ,ww1 was a failure,unemployment skyrocketed and so on and so on.The people wanted answers ,they wanted the truth,they were tired of all the bullshit lies ,so Hitler told them the truth!!Im not anti-semitic but calling a pig a pig does’nt make me anti-pig.He did’nt suduce a nation of millions with his pointed tongue and brainwashing propaganda ,(like he was some kind of Jim Jones)he simply told the truth,and what he said about the Jews WAS TRUE!!They were the cause of most of Germany’s and Russia ‘s problem’s ,and America’s now.Now what he did with that information was wrong (killing the Jews,the Russians,the handicap,the mentally ill,and so on)it does’nt give you an excuse to kill millions of people and to weed out the weaker race from the stronger (everyone has the right to live).Your typical Jewish arguement is and has always been to attack the Author and not the Facts.Fact’s are if you want a damn good example of what Jewish power does to a country look at Russia ,wake up and look at America,they bitch about 6 million Jews having died in the holocost ,what about the 66 million Christians who died in Russian gulags(that are Jewish media has convienantly forgot to report on)


Posted by unknown on Sun, 07 Jan 2007 15:52 | #

There is no doubt that Hitler passionately hated the Jews. It was a subconscio
us need of finding scapegoats for his inner conflicts, and frustrations. Neither in the Mein Kampf nor in any Nazi literature can one find accounts of Hitler having unpleasant encounters, frictions or quarrels with Jews; it looks like that Hitler had very few personal or social contacts with Jews. In 1939 Hitler personally permitted Dr. Bloch, an Jewish physician to emigrate from Austria. Dr. Bloc was the gentle physician who provided intensive care for of his ailing mother, and on several occasions Hitler expressed his gratitude. Another Jew, who played a positive role in Hitler’s life was his World War I commanding officer, who recommended Hitler for the Iron Cross. It looks like the Jews were for Hitler and abstract depersonalized evil, an mythological evil like the devil in many religions, nobody ever experienced the devil but in eyes of the believers it is a reality.
Hitler lived in Vienna from 1907 to 1913 and those were the most difficult years of his life. Hitler was trying to become an Architect or to make himself a name in field of arts. He was twice rejected from the Vienna Academy of Fine Arts. The second rejection by the Academy was one of the most traumatic experience of his life; all his dreams were shattered. After discovering that four out of seven professors that rejected him were Jewish he blamed the Jews for his failure.
“Life in Vienna was very rough for Hitler. The winter of 1909 was a severe winter. He was at the end of his resources, his hands covered with chilblains, his stomach empty; he had been begging in the streets, but no one paid any attention to him. He had no overcoat, his feet were in bad shape, and he walked painfully and slowly.”
Hitler was living a life on the periphery of the Society, eking out a meager living by peddling of his painted postcards, living in a flophouse. In Mein Kampf Hitler wrote:
“To me Vienna, the city which, to so many, is the epitome of innocent pleasure, a festive playground for merrymakers, represents, I am sorry to say, merely the living memory of the saddest period of my life. ... Five years in which I was forced to earn a living, first as a day laborers, then as a small painter; a truly meager living which never sufficed to appease even my daily hunger. Hunger was then my faithful bodyguard. .....The uncertainty of earning my dally bread soon seemed to me one of the darkest sides of my new life.
Even today this city arouse in me nothing but the most dismal thoughts. ... At the turn of the century, Vienna was, socially speaking, on of the most backwards cities in Europe. Dazzling riches and loathsome poverty alternated sharply…. The court with its dazzling glamour attracted wealth and intelligence from the rest of the country like a magnet. ....Outside the palaces in the Ring loitered thousands of unemployed, and beneath this Via Triumphalis of old Austria dwelt the homeless in the gloom and mud of the canals.
Contrasting to his own failures he saw the successful and prospering Jews in all fields of arts and culture, business and politics.
What had to ge reckoned heavily against he Jew in my eyes was when I became acquainted with their activity in the press, art, literature, and the theater. . .And when I learned to look for the Jew in all branches of cultural and artistic life and its various manifestations, I suddenly encountered him in a place where I would least have expected to find him. . . When I recognized the Jew as the leader of the Social Democracy, the scales dropped form my eyes. A long soul struggle had reached its conclusion.
Hitler found his scapegoats.. . .
My views with regard to anti-Semitism succumbed to the passage of time, and his was my greatest transformation of all.
Gradually, I began to hate them ( the Jews)....For me this was the time of the greatest spiritual upheaval I have ever had to go through, I had ceased to be a weak-kneed cosmopolitan and become an anti-Semite.
Hitler was deeply influenced with all those anti-Semitic pamphlets with all their myth of the soil, cult for the Nordic, and the romantic longing for the simple, heroic, idealized past. In Mein Kampf Hitler wrote:
For a few hellers (pennies) I bought the first anti-Semitic pamphlets of my life. Unfortunately, they all proceed from the supposition that in principle the reader knew or even understood the Jewish question to a certain degree. Besides, the tone for the most part was such that doubts again arose in me, due in part to the dull and amazingly unscientific arguments.
In Vienna Hitler was also introduced to the Social Darwinism subscribing to the idea that nations, people, cultures and individuals are subject to the same laws of natural selection as plants and animals. Life is a perpetual struggle, between individuals and nations for existence, with the survival of the stronger and more brutal and the elimination of the weaker and less fit. In my Kampf Hitler writes:
Humanity will be compelled , in consequence of the impossibility of making the fertility of the soil keep pace with the continuous increase of population, to halt the increase in human race. ....Nature has not reserved the soil for the future possession of any particular nation; but for the people that have the force to take it and the industry to cultivate it.
Hitler developed an violent outlook on life; natural laws are based on violence, and only through violence and brutal force can social problems be solved. Democracy is the enemy of the people, because it inhibits brutality, and corrupts the character of the people. In Mein Kampf Hitler writes:
Either the world will be ruled according to the ideas of democracy, or the world will be dominated according to the natural law of force; in the latter case the people of brute force will be victorious.
For Hitler life was a constant struggle, a struggle between individuals, people, races, a struggle between Nordic culture- creators, and Semitic culture-destroyers.
In the eyes of Hitler the Jews were also responsible for all social vices including prostitution and white-slave traffic:
I recognized the Jew as the cold-hearted, shameless and calculating director of this revolting vice traffic in the scum of the big city, a cold shudder ran down my back…
In anti-Semitism Hitler found an explanation for his failures, a rationalization for his sufferings - the Jews and their conspiracy. The Jews were the single cause of his tensions and humiliation. Hitler adopted the crude simplistic outlook on life: the Jews are the source of all evil in this world. Hitler found a purpose in life, cleansing the German race from the clutches of the Jews. Hatred of the Jews became his obsession, his creed, faith and religion.
Hitler became also obsessed with the preservation of the purity of the Nordic race. The world is an arena for the ongoing struggle between Gog and Almagog, between the pure and the defiled, between the Aryans and the Jews. Hitler was a megalomaniac, a man with an exaggerated notion about himself, the slightest sign of disrespect or even an argument threw him into a fury and frenzy. Hitler was full of hatred and tensions, and this hatred had to find an outlet, an enemy, the Jews the capitalists and the Jews the communists, were a convenient enemy. By adapting a notion of superiority of the Aryan race he found an explanation for his overblown feeling of superiority.
There is no doubt that in Vienna Hitler acquired his basic outlook on life, his ideas about the importance of terror, the purity of the Nordic race and his rabbit anti-Semitism. There is no doubt that Hitler hated the Jews passionately, with a fervor approaching religious fanaticism. It was the foundation of his life outlook and philosophy. ” Hitler’s career was more closely parallel to that of a charismatic religious leader than of any conventional political leader. His feelings about the Jews in particular had the quality of a religious passion; they were dead serious convictions intimately associated with crucial events in his life, and its no exaggeration to suggest that his Jew-hatred was probably the most consistent central dimension of his chaotic personality.”
There is no doubt that Hitler’s anti-Semitism had deep psychological roots. But regardless of what psychological mechanism we ascribe to his pathological hatred, one important factor was Hitler’s lack of sexuality, the point stressed by many observers of his entourage. For example Walter Schellenberg, describes a report in Heydrich’s possession stated:
“Hitler was ruled by demonic forces driving him that he ceased to have thoughts of normal cohabitation with a woman. The ecstasies of power in every form were sufficient for him. During his speeches he worked himself up to such orgiastic frenzies that he achieved complete emotional satisfaction.
Hitler’s abnormal sexual development is an important factor in his behavior. “It is well known that Hitler’s sex life was bizarre. As a young man, he repressed direct sexuality and projected his erotic energy in grandiose fantasies. In his thirties, he was consistently attracted to young childlike women who clearly resembled his mother. The could, therefore, be more easily dominated than mature women but at the same time serve as a symbolically mother figure. Waites review of the material concerning Hitler’s relationship with women makes it quite clear that he had an intense, unusual effect on them, probably because of his odd sexual demands. ....Virtually every one of at least several young women who were close to Hitler attempted or succeeded in committing suicide.
In 1945 the Russian conducted an autopsy of Hitler’s burned body and issued a report that Hitler had a sexual deformation, having only one testicle. ” Based on a controversial Soviet medical report on Hitler’s dead body which showed that he had only one testicle. Waites argues that this condition occurs frequently enough in otherwise normal males to be generally considered a minor anomaly, although it can be a source of severe anxiety. This condition was responsible for his (Hitler’s) sexual repression and consequent inability to benefit from any normal form of direct sensuality. His intense grandiose ambitions, then, can be seen as an effort to compensate for basic feeling of inferiority and isolation. In this connection, his irrational hatred of the Jews, with its specific sexual references to Jews as seducers of innocent young women, also falls into place as a protective defense mechanism.
But regardless of the theories of the mechanism and the origins of his pathological hatred, his lack of sexuality, none of the theories explains why and how was this hatred converted into actions resulting in the horrible reality of the Holocaust. Was this the working of normal mind? Human history experienced many rulers that killed compulsively like Caligula, Nero, and they were all branded as madmen. Was Hitler rational or insane?


Posted by James Bowery on Sun, 07 Jan 2007 18:55 | #

How do you discriminate between “scapegoats” and “explanations” in the case of Hitler?

All this talk of his sexuality is rather tendentious.  He was an impoverished war veteran—a position in which he found himself incapable of supporting a family.  It is reasonable for a young man who cannot support a family to try to do something about it and that may include foregoing the things that lead to offspring.  You can argue with what he did about his inability to support a child but not with his lack of having sex. 

Then there is what he did about his situation—taking a public position and actions that put him in prison.  This isn’t the sort of experience that says to a single war veteran, “See, NOW you can support children!”  His career was then in motion and the rest can be seen as an extension of that.  It is quite conceivable that till his dying day, when he did get married finally, he saw himself in a public role incompatible with the responsibilities of commitment to a woman.

Finally, there is The Transfer Agreement in which he participated in the establishment of Israel and worked out the economic exchange between Israel and Germany that would allow the “eradication” of Jews from Germany without their extermination.

This appears to be an entirely rational move in peacetime.

Where Hitler appears to have gone off the tracks was his subsequent investment in military ventures rather than the building of Jewish homeland.


Posted by taylor on Mon, 12 Mar 2007 19:20 | #

i think hitler is a selfish jelous old man


Posted by Lurker on Mon, 12 Mar 2007 21:09 | #

is taylor. Do you know something we dont?


Posted by bigboli on Mon, 14 Apr 2008 03:51 | #

Last word on this topic:

Hitler was good for Germany but not for the rest of Europe and especially not for the Jews.  So, if a German sees Hitler as a problem, then he has been affected by the fear of witch-hunting created after WWII.  By the way “Guessedworker” has presented the real issue well.  Cheers.


Posted by Robert ap Richard on Tue, 13 May 2008 23:35 | #

unknown’s Jan 7th 2:52pm post is a marvelous capturing of all the tired old lies we’ve been hearing for years, the half-baked Freudian pseudo-“psychology” and other childish “reasoning” about this subject.  Thank you, unknown, for taking the time to write your summary.


Posted by hinduja on Sat, 12 Jul 2008 07:45 | #

As far known Hitler is cruel to the most of the people in Europe, but he is good at German. But i guess he is very jealous and adamant kind of person and i also know that history relates someone with Hitler very badly with those birth dates and some stuffs like that. If anyone needs to know more about it. Just let me know.


Posted by swamibu on Thu, 06 Nov 2008 18:27 | #

I think Hitler was gay as were many of the top nazis. They were closeted. I read a really intereting article in which there was substantial evidence about the gay leanings of nazis. In fact it was so prevelant in many parts of Germany. It just wasn’t popular to be a fem gay but a more manly gay. It was know that Ernst Rohm and many other top nazis had gay leanings. I think that Hitler and the germans and Nazis given their decadence hated Jews because they were moral and knew how to make money, something of which Germans didn’t seem to have a talent. I also think that they wanted to rob them and since they already hated them, killing them and stealing their money was a logical step for them.

As for your argument about “leftists” racism is racism. Blacks, Latinos, and other so called minorities in America but majorities in the world, are discriminated against. It is getting better but there was sytematic discrimination to keep blacks, Latinos, and other minorities out. However, thankfully, the global economy now affords these groups greater opportunities for employment, Entrepreneuralship, etc. I have seem a lot of taletless people of caucasion persuasion in positions in which they weren’t qualified but a more qualified black person or Latino, or asian is excluded. Thank God however, there are good and moral caucasions and this trend is changing with diversity initiatives.


Posted by Janie on Sat, 20 Dec 2008 23:26 | #

I can’t believe all the mindless racost comments I’ve read here. Hilter WAS A LOSER A NOBODY before the war that no doubt would have gone back to being a LOSER after the war was over. I believe he had such feelings if inferiority that he compesanted by bringing into action ABOMINABLE plans like his “Final Solution”. You would have to be INSANE to want to kill people just for being from an ethnic

Phil you sound like a RACIST BIGGOT!!!!


Posted by Captainchaos on Sun, 21 Dec 2008 00:15 | #

Janie: “I can’t believe all the mindless racost comments I’ve read here.”

I’ll bet you didn’t know that post-war 15 million Germans were ethnically cleansed from eastern Europe with 2-3 million of them dying as a result.  I’ll bet you didn’t know that the Jews were the driving force behind the Bolshevik revolution, that Jews dreamed up and ran the gulag system and that a Jew, Lazar Kaganovitch, along with his predominantly Jewish thugs presided over the intentional starvation of 7 million Ukrainians in the 1930’s. 

The Holohoax is a filthy lie that is not supported by any official German documents (as the outrages of the Judeo-Bolsheviks are supported by reams of original Soviet documents) or any scientific evidence.  There were no ‘gas chambers’ used to exterminate millions of Jews.


Posted by Gudmund on Sun, 21 Dec 2008 01:41 | #

given their decadence hated Jews because they were moral and knew how to make money, something of which Germans didn’t seem to have a talent.


Germany went from unification in 1871 to the most powerful industrial state in the world in the space of 30 years!  Israel still cannot build a viable economy apart from the billions in aid we send each year!

Germans as a people are creative and prosperous.  Jews as a people are parasitic and harbingers of decay.

“Moral”?!?  Lay off the intoxicants before you post here again.


Posted by Urma on Sat, 10 Jan 2009 22:55 | #

main point, hitler started the holocaust bcuz he had some kinda beef with jews. i had to a project on him (AGHH!) and it says he thought jews were the reason for war, or the depression. anywho, he is a very bad man and we all hate him!


Posted by Fred Scrooby on Sun, 11 Jan 2009 02:25 | #

There was no ©Ho£o€au$t®™, Urma.  It’s made up.  Wartime/post-war propaganda.  Never happened.  Good luck with your studies.


Posted by tim on Sat, 14 Feb 2009 04:37 | #

I have a few simple things to say. you sit here and say the Holocaust never happened you say “death camps” aren’t real. How the heck do you come to that conclusion. When Auschwitz is real. How can you look a jewish man in the face who lived through it? Use your mind people i mean honestly, the Holocaust happened. Yes things just like the Holocaust are happening all over the world and we as a people need to do something about it. But we dont we have people who sit around and say the shit doesnt happen OPEN YOUR EYES! view the world form my families prespective for five minutes. Look at the pictures for me just once. Go to the museum just once, and then tell me it never happened. Better yet, meet my Grandmother and tell her it didnt happen. And when she was a child she didnt watch her mother die by the hands of a German soilder in a “death camp”.

The Holocaust happened some of you people are just ignorant to the hard truth. And before i get told off or told that im the ignorant one. You all can never change my point of view. Im one of the lucky ones in the world who actually sees the truth from the bullshit poeple like you tried to feed us. The Holocaust happened plain and simple, now it is time for you all to realize it.


Posted by Fred Scrooby on Sat, 14 Feb 2009 09:03 | #

@ Tim:  those voices standing up for historical truth and accuracy in regard to what happened to the Jews during WW II, those voices questioning this bizarre, immoral-in-the-extreme continuation of, nay reinforcement of and further entrenchment of, Allied wartime propaganda during peacetime, hold Jewish lives to be as sacred as you do and everyone else does.  Their claim is:  1) there is no evidence the Nazi government had a policy of killing all of Europe’s Jews; 2) the expression “the final solution” referred at the time to the Nazi intention to find a way to expel Europe’s Jews — to Palestine perhaps, or to Madegascar for example or, failing that, to put them all into what would be a Jewish country to be located possibly in former Polish, Russian, or Austrian Galician territory; 3) during the war Europe’s Jews in their millions were rounded up by the Nazis and put in camps where conditions eventually became horrific due to disease and starvation; 4) thousands of Jews were shot/hanged in the East as the Germans advanced and liberated Christian populations who, having endured more than two decades of Jewish (bolshevik) anti-Christian plunder, torture, rape, pillage, expropriation and forced “collectivization,” deliberate starvation, killing, and genocide, meted out summary justice to their tormentors; 5) as a result of all the above, some hundreds of thousands of innocent Jews perished (around 300,000-350,000 is the figure that I accept), none of them by being gassed; 6) there is no evidence Germany gassed Jews or anyone else in the camps; 7) there is firm scientific and documentary evidence that the gassing claim is so implausible as to be essentially ruled out; 8) the “six million” figure was a wild invention included as part of wartime and immediate post-war propaganda, an imaginary figure which seems actually to have originated with the Jewish community decades earlier, prior to the First World War, as some sort of mystical or kabalistic number of Jewish dead, possibly symbolizing a condition Jews believed had to be fulfilled before God would let them return to the land of Israel; something like that is where that invented number came from.

Tim, why have the Jews brought such heavy pressure to bear on so many governments to make the open, public airing of these matters by scholars illegal?  That behavior on the part of the Jews by itself strongly suggests proponents of the reality of the “Holocaust” have something to hide.  What could that something be?  What it certainly is is the “Holocaust” never happened as claimed in “the standard version.”

Would you like to share your thoughts on the Jewish role in communism in general and the Holodomor in particular?  Do the Jews as a group acknowledge their guilt in regard to both of those?  Are they appropriately conscience-stricken?  Do they repent as a group?  Or do they arrogantly and falsely deny any group-responsibility?

(Just curious ....)


Posted by Fred Scrooby on Sat, 14 Feb 2009 16:39 | #

Read this, Tim,

http://www.brusselsjournal.com/node/3792 ,

to see what the Jews inflicted on Russia, keeping in mind this account comes to us only from 1919, just the barest beginning of the Russian people’s nightmare, the demonic thing hadn’t even gotten fully off the ground yet, hadn’t even gotten fully suited-up yet, and even for that year this account is not the thousandth, not the ten-thousandth, of the horror of it at its barest beginnings let alone the words-cannot-describe horror of it once it had really established itself in subsequent years and decades.  The Jews did all of that:  “the Bolsheviks” is another term for “the Jews,” exactly as today, let’s say, “the Neocons” is, or “the most fanatical Open-Borders advocates.”  And when the linked review goes on to talk briefly about the true underlying nature of this “anti-hate-speech” culture that’s being imposed on us today, and how it’s naught but a trial-run of an intended system of a much fuller totalitarianism, it’s talking about more Jewish handiwork:  the “hate-speech” culture now being imposed is the work of Jewry.

Do you as a Jew have any thoughts about any of this, Tim?  Does your tribe, the Jews, have anything to feel remorse for as a group? Can the blame for any genocides, any wars, any horrific oppressions and totalitarianisms, be laid at their feet?  Or are Germans solely blameworthy, when one is talking about this almost sui generis category of group-guilt?


Posted by David on Sun, 15 Feb 2009 14:40 | #

It always amazes me how many people there are out there who say the holocaust never
happened. In my mind these people are just trying to get a start out of people, and are just
trying to initiate an argument. Obviously it is a very sensitive subject, and it is very easy for
people to respond very emotionally. If you showed these people actual video of millions of jews being gassed and placed in the ovens, many of them would still claim the video was a falsehood as well. Some people just like to stir up human emotions.  With all the evidence we have of the holocaust, you would have to be a complete idiot not to believe it happened. I will give the people who claim the holocaust didn’t happen the benefit of the doubt and say that they are not complete idiots…. only shit disturbers.


Posted by Fred Scrooby on Sun, 15 Feb 2009 15:26 | #

Will the Jewish overlords permit us to at least discuss the matter, David?  If not, why not?  Something so obvious cannot possibly risk being overturned by scholarly inquiry, no?  Surely, surely, surely, if it’s so clear what happened, all scholarly research can only confirm the current standard version of what happened?  Why do the Jewish overlords devote so much effort and money to making sure this won’t be discussed?  What can they be afraid of?  Is there a total Jewish lockdown on people who think the moon is made of green cheese?  If we’re allowed to discuss what the moon is made of why can’t we discuss whether the Holocau$t happened as claimed?  What are the Jewish overlords afraid of, if it’s so obvious that it happened as claimed?  Please don’t go away without answering, David — Jews generally do that (I surmise you’re Jewish):  they come by, take a few pot shots at the thread (or they post a few Negro-on-blonde-shiksa porn pics), then they disappear.  Please do answer the question and don’t vanish, David!

Now you may say there’s no law against discussing the Hollowhoax here, only in Canada and many European countries( * ).  My reply is until all European countries and Canada lift all legal restrictions on discussing it all scholarship everywhere on this issue is hindered, stunted, squelched, suffocated.  Europe, not here, is where the contrarian eye-witnesses or family members are who can be interviewed (less and less as they die off of course, exactly as the Jews would like), Europe is where the documentation is to be ferreted out and the often decisive scientific experimentation like Germar Rudolph’s conducted, Europe is where the natural scholarly talent from a cultural and pcychological point of view for investigating this issue is found.  The Jewish lockdown on any investigation of this issue in Europe stifles the discovery of the truth of what happened.  Why do the Jews want to stifle discovery of the truth in this matter?

( *  as well as other places the Jews have had their way with in this regard — I was surprised to see for example where Bishop Williamson is now under possibly criminal investigation in Argentina for having expressed the view that he found some scholarship on the question persuasive — the Jews have made it that you can’t say that in Argentina apparently.  Where has the Jewish tentacle not reached?  Is Iran the only place?  I’m even beginning to wonder about China, Korea, and Japan!  Is there a place on this Earth where the Jews have not intruded their Holocau$t-lockdown tentacles?)


Posted by Dasein on Sun, 15 Feb 2009 19:57 | #

My reply is until all European countries and Canada lift all legal restrictions on discussing it all scholarship everywhere on this issue is hindered, stunted, squelched, suffocated.

And as the Toben case recently showed, if you travel anywhere within the ever-expanding EU, you face the risk of being shipped off to a member state to face trial.  Perhaps one day all Western countries will sign extradition treaties for crimes of conscience related to Holocaust dogma.


Posted by Damien on Wed, 18 Feb 2009 12:35 | #

I was wondering how if Stalin & Adolf Hitler still alive until now? What will happen to all Jews


Posted by Jojo on Sun, 03 May 2009 12:35 | #

Posted by unknown on January 07, 2007, 02:52 PM | #

There is no doubt that Hitler passionately hated the Jews. It was a subconscio
us need of finding scapegoats for his inner conflicts, and frustrations.

The picture is not as simple as that, there were many generals in top position who were half jews. The question is if Hitler hated the jews so passionately then why did he employ jews/half jews?

Werner Goldberg was a half jew employed by the nazis.There are many examples like this from Nazi Germany.There was half Jew Colonel Walter Hollaender, who received Hitler’s military awards: Also the half Jew Luftwaffe General Helmut Wilberg was a recipient of the military awards. There are many more such examples.


Posted by Fred Scrooby on Sun, 03 May 2009 16:49 | #

May I suggest some reading material:  David Leslie Hoggan’s The Forced War:  Why Peaceful Revision Failed. ( http://www.revisionists.com/revisionists/hoggan.html )  It’s out of print but every good library has it and you can get from second hand bookstores.  I don’t know of a better source concerning the events that lead to W.W. II.  (—Friedrich Braun, June 27, 2005, 10:16 PM)

At Amazon.com the book’s title is given as <u>Forced War: When Peaceful Revision Failed</u> by David L. Hoggan,

http://www.amazon.com/Forced-War-Peaceful-Revision-Failed/dp/0939484285/ref=sr_1_3?ie=UTF8&s=books&qid=1241359112&sr=1-3 .


Posted by Diane on Tue, 21 Jul 2009 13:56 | #

Ive read this whole post trying to understand why white suppremists hate jews and not a single one of you, even between your little online fights have explained it. What a total waste of time


Posted by nim on Fri, 31 Jul 2009 04:29 | #

deleted - stupidity at work, probably quasi-governmental stupidity.


Posted by Lurker on Fri, 31 Jul 2009 05:40 | #

nim - I only recently became coversant with the term ‘mobying’. I’ve got a feeling you already know a bit about it.


Posted by alex on Mon, 21 Sep 2009 12:32 | #

frederick and cohorts,i respect your views and your thoughts,but my belief is you don’t even know what you’re saying.You’re using all those terms and trying to sound really educated,but i can’t help but laugh at you.It sounds to me like you’re trying to justify the brutal killing of several thousand jewish men,WOMEN AND CHILDREN.Your basic reason being they were more successful than the germans.Correct me if i’m wrong.Doesn’t that sound a liittle demented to you\?NO MATTER WHAT YOU THINK<HITLER WAS A PIECE OF CRAP AND I CAN BET MY LIFE HE"S ROTTING IN HELL.He probably has a special suite reserved for him there.No matter what anyone thinks,there was no reason for the killings.And i don’t think anyone is his/her right senses should even try to give reasons.No matter what race you are,black,white,brown i don’t care,we’re all humans and have a right to life.You’re all ssounding educated,i wonder just how smart you’ll remain when you and your families are hunted down and killed.Your houses burned,children starved,husbands and wives gunned down in the streets,friends and families thrown into chambers and fed with poisonous gases.Next time,think of that before you try to justify what hthe bastard did.btw,i’m not jewish


Posted by Fred Scrooby on Mon, 21 Sep 2009 12:47 | #

“Correct me if i’m wrong.”  (—alex)

I correct you.  You’re wrong.


Posted by vanessa and edson on Tue, 08 Dec 2009 21:48 | #

i dont like it it was awful


Posted by one hindu (pro israeli) on Wed, 09 Dec 2009 12:29 | #

Its true that anti-jewish sentiments were prevalent throughout Europe during Hitler’s time and he capitalised on those sentiments in German minds in order to gain popularity. I still think the reason why he ordered the pogrom against jews is still a mistery. Hitler was a super racist but no one ever in the history of human civilisation did what Hitler ordered against the jews.


Posted by Wanderer on Wed, 09 Dec 2009 16:52 | #

one hindu:
I still think the reason why he ordered the pogrom against jews is still a mistery.

1.) There was no order to exterminate the Jews.

2.) No one was gassed.

3.) 6-million Jews dying in German-occupied Europe is a baseless figure, exaggerated by 600% or so.

4.) The million or so Jews who did perish under German auspices is a smaller proportion of dead (1/16million total World Jewry) than the Germans themselves suffered in the disastrous 1940-1949 period. Some unknown several-hundred-thousand figure of Jews also died under Soviet control, including 200,000 in Red Army uniforms (regular soldiers). During the evacuations of Jews in 1941, Stalin sent most to temporary housing in Siberia, little better than gulags, and many died in the poor conditions there, too.
—Thus the Jews lost at very most 10% of their (world) population under combined German and Soviet auspices (not more than three-fourths of which died in German-held territory of all causes [one of which was not “gassing”], including the horrible late-war starvation and disease epidemics in the camps that had been cutoff from resupply by Western bombs). The Jews also gained a national-state for the first time in 2,000 years.
—The Germans lost around 15% of their total population dead through 1949—and lost one-third of their national territory, annexed by Stalin. All Germans therein were expelled.

In sum:
Jews: 10% dead, an ethnostate gained, political carte-blanche gained.
Germans: 15% dead, one-third of territory lost (never to be returned), eternal shame (over a Lie).
All racialEuropeans on Earth: Hands thereafter bound when discussing ethnopolitical matters. Saying “Europe should stay European” too loudly is now almost enough to be jailed, or certainly at least monitored by the political police in much of the EU. And yet people believe the Jews were the great victims of the war!

5.) The fact that the myths mentioned in points #1, #2, and #3 live on [i.e., people believe “Hitler ordered 6-million Jews to be gassed”] is a remnant of wartime hysteria and the blackest of black-propaganda, which took hold in 1945 for political reasons. It continues on for the same (political) reason(s).

6.) These myths have been well-understood to be myths by those not mentally-chained by Political Correctness for many years now.

7.) To peruse the large body of scholarly work on this subject, see codoh.com or vho.org ; for a more relaxed presentation (passive video watching rather than lots of text), see holocaustdenialvideos.com


Posted by Frank Noce on Sun, 10 Jan 2010 06:54 | #

I believe the Jews were destine for extermination just as the American Indians were @ just a future groups such as the various indigents Indian groups in south America will be for the same reasons. They were ,and are small weak groups who are not strong enough to protect @ hold on to land,property @ positions that stronger entities covet. The new Jewish nation is in that same precarious position. They only survive at the pleasure of the united stars of America. How long that pleasure will last is questionable.


Posted by bob on Wed, 13 Jan 2010 03:36 | #

fuck yah hitler u did something that we love u for i hope ur in heaven god bless u


Posted by thetruth on Fri, 22 Jan 2010 23:10 | #

Why is this such an interesting topic?  What about the land that was taken from the Indians, the slavery of the Blacks, etc., etc., etc.  I think it’s some Jewish propaganda or another way to gain attention.  I know Jews personally.  For the most part, they are pedofiles, liars, manipulators, racists and have this ongoing “nonsense” stupid attitude of, “we’re all better than everyone else.”  Oh they moan and cry about the holocaust but wouldn’t dare become true friends with anyone outside of their race.  They’re so full of BS.  I don’t feel sorry for them.  I don’t condone anyone being killed in gas chambers but I do believe that this story may have been, “manipulated” by some Jews to gain attention, pity and personal gain.  These people (yes I DO mean all of them) are heartless, shameful, sickos.  Why did you have to break my heart and say that there wasn’t 6 million - why?  They primarily own the entertainment business.  Now ask yourself these questions:  Why do they show blonde hair/blue eyes folks as dominant? Is it because they “love” them so much???  Come on folks.  Wasn’t it the blond hair/blue eyed folks (under Hitler’s rule) that supposedly annihilated them?  Or is it their sick way to try and pay the Germans back by exploiting them?  Just look at the way they repetitiously display blond hair/blue eyes women for example: no brains, whores, big boobs, etc.  Don’t get me wrong.  The Jews are very smart, yet quite ignorant as well.  They use people for their own selfish gains.  A lot is NEVER enough for them.  I could go on and on, but you get my point.  I know some of you disagree with me, but these are my personal beliefs and I’m sticking to them!!


Posted by thetruth on Fri, 22 Jan 2010 23:17 | #

Oh, I forgot.  They also dominate a great deal of the legal system as well i.e. attorneys, judges (“Judge Judy and other similar disrespecting idiots like her, accountans, etc.  What fools got caught up in their treachery and gave them such authority.  Or is it that they truly are, “the chosen people” and their God is showing them favor?  If that is the case then what happened during the supposed holocaust?  Was their God mad at them at the time.  Did God cool off, get the “Jewish Guilt” and then gave them some authority in America and abroad?  What’s really going on here!!?


Posted by thetruth on Fri, 22 Jan 2010 23:39 | #

Just fantasize with me for a moment.  Imagine all of the Jews going back to their supposed Motherland (Israel) while leaving the United States and neighboring Countries…..................Didn’t that feel great (if only for a brief moment).  That’s just more BS.  They probably wronged the Arabs who saw them for what and who they really are which is probably why they are hated so much!!!  We don’t know the whole (or real) story.  I can only imagine.  Maybe the Arabs don’t find the pure enough to obtain the land.  So what did the Jews do??  They came to America and dirtied up our Country with their pornography, pedofilia, etc.—-  and don’t forget Gambling, etc.  They use entertainment as a form of brainwashing and manipulation.  The list goes on and on….. I hope some Jews are reading this and before responding just think about all the nights your fathers spent in your sister’s bedrooms; all the times your mothers asked for more and more and more; all the times your uncles stared at your girlfriends with lust; all the times your sisters were jealous of you “just because” they wanted all of the attention and possible future money from the parents’; all the times you thought you were having a great time and your mothers began to fake sad faces and started talking negatively; how your mothers always wanted to be the focus of attention no matter what the event; how you sit with your friends and boast about your assets while others are struggling financially; how your little pets are no longer virgins, yet there are no other pets around…I repeat, the list goes on.  Read it until it sinks in, although I’m sure that I’ve stepped on a few toes already.  Who knows maybe Hitler was molested by a Jew?  Possibly his own mother OR father - who knows?  Maybe he was molested by Jewish educators who gave him false hope yet never delivered - who knows?


Posted by optician on Sat, 27 Feb 2010 08:12 | #

Jews are incompatible to any society.That is a worldwide proof.Actually Adolf Hitler’s hate came from his youth years when he lived in Vienna.In these years he actually accumulated all his views and a remarkable knowledge of how


Posted by NeoNietzsche on Sat, 27 Feb 2010 14:16 | #

Now, after Germany had conquered all of Europe, even assuming Britain had not followed the policies you have critiqued, what was the guarantee with all of europe under his control, Hitler would not have invaded Britain?

The “guarantee” was the fact that Britain would have been a tremendous economic and administrative LIABILITY for Germany - a f**king nightmare!  The GDR was on the edge of starvation as it was, and having to arrange (for just one example of the problem) the non-existent shipping to Britain of a non-existent food surplus was, of course, non-sensical.

The *only* reason for taking control of the island would have been to prevent its use as an aircraft carrier off the coast of the Continent.

It is what the Yanks would call a “no brainer”. With a vastly superior military (and the Wehrmacht was man for man probably the finest army of all time) and all the advantages one needs, would Hitler have stopped in the name of principle? I think not.

I think so.

Hitler was one of the most remarkable politicians in history in his faithfulness to his stated principles.  He evidently, authentically, believed in his racialist principles and the implication thereof regarding the racial fraternity of the Germanic peoples.  His control of the Continent was the doing of the Allies - Hitler had only wanted to move East - and Hitler was willing to make drastic concessions of French territory for the sake of peace with his brothers across the Channel.


Posted by NeoNietzsche on Sat, 27 Feb 2010 14:37 | #


There is no way to wash over the Nazis as heroes or as reasonable men no matter how many of these lies you [FB] refute (and there are many, no doubt - starting with some elements of the Holocaust story itself).


Much more, by way of philosophical sophistication, would need to be adduced in order to dissolve the naive moralizing with which you would condemn Hitler and NS.


Posted by NeoNietzsche on Sat, 27 Feb 2010 14:59 | #

The Yankees needed no Jews to invade the South and murder hundreds of thousands of their own kin in the name of abolishing slavery. Why did they do it? In much of Europe in our time, Jewish influence is minimal and yet the progressive agenda marches on.

“Abolishing slavery” was the rationale, but not the reason for it.

Just as we are bringing “democracy” to the Middle East, today, on behalf of Judeo-fascist imperialism.

The War of Northern Aggression was ignited, rather, when it appeared that the Tariff was not going to be paid.

Thus simple imperialism was pursued, coated with sanctimony to sweeten it for the morons who had to do the suffering and dying for the Money Power.

The “progressive agenda,” however, is the *major* factor in global Judeo-Communist developments in the present day - and for which agenda our Jewish elite is naturally responsible.


Posted by NeoNietzsche on Sat, 27 Feb 2010 15:24 | #


Does it ever occur to you [FB] that open admiration for Hitler does more harm than good (leaving aside for the moment historical analysis of the Third Reich on which I am willing to concede that views would not be uniform)?

There is no shortage of “far right” American “white nationalists” who have been swinging Swasikas for decades. And they wouldnt be able to win an election for the local dog warden if they decided to contest tomorrow. It never occured to them that their Nazi symbolism may itself be the real reason why they don’t succeed.

Wouldn’t matter if a *majority* of Greater Judeans were ready to vote for a *Nazi*.

Greater Judea is not a democracy - we run beauty-pageants/popularity-contests to select amongst proffered Jew-stooges with the most money behind them.  An authentic representative would be preemptively killed or otherwise excluded.

Supposedly, our one strength is in reliance upon the truth - because effective propaganda is now the monopoly of Jewry.  *Any* victimological argument, or conventional Judeo-Christian moralizing, ultimately serves *their* purposes, reinforcing an egalitarian moral universe leading to the anarchistic global *disorder* that is the implication of the socio-economic homogenization of humanity.


Posted by NeoNietzsche on Sat, 27 Feb 2010 17:06 | #

My first concern is with the survival of Europe. I don’t give a fig about revisionist History if there’s no Europe left in five decades for my prospective grandchildren to grow up in. And it is my responsibility and that of all Europeans to avert such an eventuality. Openly identifying with Nazis compromises that very badly.

Doesn’t matter what compromises what, in Europe.

Europeans can’t do shit for themselves.

Greater Judea fucked you up - and it’s our responsibility to undo the damage, if that’s possible.

Your open identification with Nazis might bring Greater Judean troops back into Europe, from stoogery in the Middle East, where they are going to be needed to save Europe from what will be represented as “Terrorism” - but which will be a false-flag operation.  Mark my words for reference in a future decade.


Posted by ben tillman on Mon, 01 Mar 2010 03:52 | #

An authentic representative would be preemptively killed or otherwise excluded.

E.g., George Wallace.  And after the elimination of Wallace, the elimination of the lesser of two evils, Nixon.


Posted by Wandrin on Mon, 01 Mar 2010 06:17 | #

“Hitler was wrong about the Jews but why he thought what he did is only a mystery if you want it to be”

jews will always seek to weaken the national unity of the host population out of paranoid self-interest. Whatever divisions exist within a host jews will be disproportionately involved in magnifying them. It won’t be all jews. It won’t even neccessarily be most jews. But they will always be disproportionately found in any movement or organisation that is attempting to weaken the host because they will see weakening the host as good for the security of the jewish minority. Any international minority tribe of different blood who exist inside the terriotory of a larger tribe is liable to act the same way.

Secondly, unless they are explicitly kept down by law or banished completely then they will always eventually cause economic collpase in a host. jewish greed is a symptom of their minority status paranoia. They crave security through wealth. However there is no limit - no matter how many billions they accrue they remain a paranoid minority so they always want more. Since being chased out of Europe and into the Anglosphere by Hitler they’ve managed to take complete control of the financial institutions of what used to be the richest countries in the world and they’ve driven them into the ground bringing the world economy to its knees in the process. They will always do this.

I hope the Indians, Chinese, Koreans and Japanese are taking note and working to protect themselves in advance for when the western world crumbles and the locusts swarm east.


Posted by Miguel A. Alarcon on Sat, 20 Mar 2010 07:48 | #

I did not see any records if Hitler Escapes though, and Australian Jews saying that they did not suffer anitsmitisim well thats bullshit I bet the Japanese has killed all the Jews in Australia and Hitler flew to Australia and the invention of nuclear weapons might say that Japan problably nuke Isreal before it became a nation 3 years before, with a bomb that could vanish the Jews.

This is nonesense they need to look more deep all of this is lies, Hitler killed Jews in Germany he flew off and went to Australia, the Japanese killed Chinese in Nanking and killed Jews in Australia while Hitler came their and planed to nuke Isreal in 1945, anyway the failed and we won the war let it all go deep and make some more research.


Posted by Eva Ottmischerz on Mon, 22 Mar 2010 03:44 | #

your all freaks who dont know anything you all are talking like you were there but none of you were LOSERS go outside and get some sun. ALL HEIL HITLER


Posted by angel gold on Tue, 23 Mar 2010 17:52 | #

i asked bout the HOLOCAUST and u gave me useless rubbish !!


Posted by mariami on Fri, 26 Mar 2010 14:35 | #

Holocaust is not only Hitler’s blame, I do not understand how could world let such massacre to happen, where was the world at this time.?! Why people let Hitler to exist?! I feel sorry for people who worked for Hitler and I"m proud of those who died in struggling with Adolph Hitler. This person within his cruel, inhuman activities is the world’s shame, which would never be recovered.


Posted by Klaus Eyting on Wed, 07 Apr 2010 22:50 | #

Seems pretty silly and quite off the mark.  It was too wordy so I really didn’t read all of it.  And I’ve read none of the comments.  I came out of Hitler’s Germany.  The answer is so much simpler.  Jewish interests controlled the banking and held the major economic power in Germany in the twenties.  There was a 1926 National Geographic article about that.  Hitler asked the Jewish interests to invest in his designs.  they declined and he took what he wanted; divesting the jewish peple of their wealth, their freedom, and ultimately their lives.  It was no more complicated than that.
  All of this speculation and offering of ignorant opinion is silly and even stupid.  You weren’t there.  You don’t know.  It was a horrible time for all of us.  It was insanity for the sake of power.  Stop speculating and trying to sound as if you know anything.  You don’t.


Posted by Ivan on Fri, 16 Apr 2010 04:26 | #

In order to understand why Hitler hated Jews, you don’t have to know anything about Hitler - all you need to do is to take a good look at the tribe as a WHOLE, not as individuals but as a WHOLE. They are hated because they are thieves, liars, war mongers, because they push homosexuality and every degeneracy imaginable upon societies they dwell within. They know exactly what they richly deserve for fleecing, demoralizing, and sucking blood out of gentile communities. The backlash against the Jews had happened many times in the past, and, undoubtedly, it will happen again. That’s why they have readied Department of Homeland Security, that’s why they are pushing and pushing the hate laws - they know that they deserve to be hated, and they will be hated openly and universally when the economic troubles erupt in full force.


Posted by angel_from_hell on Thu, 29 Apr 2010 12:25 | #

well im a fourteen year old and im doing an oral talk about hilter and this information is usefull bt if i may ask.. where on earth do i start ?? tis ahuge topic and mostly the thing i wnat to focus on was what he did to the jews,how he did it and why he did it… please reply ill take any answer at this desperate moment.. tnx smile btw peace evry1.. lol


Posted by wake up on Sat, 05 Jun 2010 06:24 | #

You people are all either really stupid or Jewish.

Hitler wanted to take out all the Jews because they were a cancer to society just like they are today.  Jews owned the majority of business and would build wealth and not give back to the communities…..where the hell do you think all the Jew jokes came from about hoarding money or being cheap?  Do you think these jokes were made up or just invented in the last few decades?  Jews were the cause of problems back in the days of Hitler and they are a bigger problem now.    Get rid of them and our economy will get jump start and we can save the lives of thousands of soldiers and innocent people who are targets because of some connection with those damn Jews.  Oh…..and Obama only hates the Jews who act like the classic Jew….Lazy, sneaky, and causing problems and expecting everyone to deal with it.  The same way he hates blacks that are lazy and using the minority status for a free ride….


Posted by Stuart Tootell on Sat, 05 Jun 2010 06:51 | #

Well said the Jewish boycott of German goods and services in the 1930s is conventionally ignored and the damage it did to an already frail German economy.

for too long the jews have traded on the urban myth of their loss of 6,000,000 lives during the Holocaust as the Jews themselves called it during the trial of Eichmann .

6,000,000 dead included all who perished not a minority group of Jews.


Posted by hannah on Mon, 14 Jun 2010 05:56 | #

hitler?? oh yea.. hitler the leader of national socialist german workers party thing…
I hate him seriously!!


Posted by gemma on Tue, 15 Jun 2010 07:59 | #

So it was only a million—though I doubt it I will accept your figure for the moment—is that a minor figure to you?  And, as for Jews being responsible for every problem of every ne’er-do-well in the whole ...world, when do you finally get mature enough to stop blaming others for your own problems.  Taking responsibility for your life is the first step in a world where one finally recognizes that all human beings have both the potential for good and for evil within them.  These are choices you make as individuals, not as religious or ethnic groups.  Some of you also seem to be ignorant of the recent genetic research that has proven we are all the progeny of a race begun on the African Continent.  How white does that make you.  There is no such thing as a pure race, except in some sick dreams such as Hitler’s.


Posted by John Walters on Tue, 15 Jun 2010 09:15 | #

‘as for Jews being responsible for every problem of every ne’er-do-well in the whole ...world, when do you finally get mature enough to stop blaming others for your own problems.  Taking responsibility for your life is the first step in a world’

Indeed.  So if you send the USS Liberty to the sea - take responsibility, it’s your fault that it will get destroyed, not the fault of the Israelis who will fire the bullets, missiles, and bombs.

If you leave your atom bomb blueprints where the Rosenbergs can steal them - it’s *your* fault the plans got stolen.  The thieves are blameless.

If you have kidneys, well, it’s your fault that the mayors of three New Jersey cities
Paul Zambrano, Mayor of West Long Branch, NJ
John Merla, Mayor of Keyport, NJ
Paul Coughlin, Mayor of Hazlet, NJ
will collude and conspire to steal your kidneys and sell them.  It’s *your* fault - the people who cut out your kidneys are just successful because they’re better.


Posted by gemma on Tue, 15 Jun 2010 18:14 | #

Should I blame all Christians for the bloodshed that was perpetrated in the name of religion?  Should I wish you dead for what was done by your ancestors?  Can you control what governments of the world do?  I never knew I was so powerful because of my Jewish heritage!!! 

I personally don’t condone violence, am I culpable for the crimes of a country I don’t live in because I share a genetic history with the majority of their population?  Can I control you and your hatred of me whom you do not even know?  My family was decimated by the Nazis and you think that is alright but shout about other crimes. 

I am one person who despite your prejudice against me, defends your right to your opinion—and I would never wish your destruction because of what you believe.  I only hope for a world where instead of violence which begets more violence, we ALL come to our senses before this beautiful planet gets blown to smithereens.  I wish for peace, and tolerance and all the things you will most likely make fun of. 

I came to this site out of curiosity and found that voice of hate that loves misery and more hate.  I don’t believe I can, nor will I try to change your minds, but I will live my life in a way that breeds peace and tolerance even more passionately now that I know the opposite is still so very alive.


Posted by Aaron Austin on Sun, 04 Jul 2010 00:24 | #

I didn’t realize that it was so common to hate jews in Europe at the time.  That explains why they went along with his early anti-jew stuff, but I still can’t believe that nobody objected when the death camps were made public.

“Jews were the cause of problems back in the days of Hitler and they are a bigger problem now.  Get rid of them and our economy will get jump start”

Good lord, man.  Easy!


Posted by Angela on Sun, 04 Jul 2010 02:46 | #

I hope the Indians, Chinese, Koreans and Japanese are taking note and working to protect themselves in advance for when the western world crumbles and the locusts swarm east.

If you take a deeply racial/evolutionary view, it’s entirely conceivable that Jews may be adapted to exploit particular host populations; notably Europeans. What form would these adaptations take? Well presumably ast least one of them is manipulation through specific verbal and literary skills. A pre-adapatation for these would have been mercantile and legal skills (judicial). It seems to be that port to the literary part of the European mind that is most vulnerable to attack. However, Chinese and similar Easterners have different processes for handling language. So actually Jews may be up against it in trying to exploit these populations. It depends how general the Jewish adapatations are. If you look at many parasites, however, the adaptations do tend to be highly specific. Further, the Chinese and similar have themselves specific targetted adaptations. They’re less generalised then Europeans in may areas.


Posted by Wandrin on Sun, 04 Jul 2010 07:58 | #


It seems to be that port to the literary part of the European mind that is most vulnerable to attack. However, Chinese and similar Easterners have different processes for handling language.

Yes, agree on all points. I’d add appearance also. They’d need to be able to pass for oriental so we should see lots of jewish-oriental pairings for the offspring - adoptions also. That process might also give them an “in” on the verbal front. Although i’d imagine that could lead to an eastern vs western jew split in the future.

Strange stuff.

On balance i think they’ll hit a brick wall in China/Japan/Korea but time will tell.


Posted by Paul on Fri, 16 Jul 2010 04:13 | #


Whatever the reason, no one but Hitler set a State System that had government kill people efficiently.

Whether it was Jews, which were the majority, whatever age, gypsies or anyone else that did not fit his political goal of convincing all Germans he was ridding the society of non German people.

He failed.

The US was the tool that brought him down.

God bless the USA.



Posted by C Walledge on Sat, 17 Jul 2010 08:07 | #

If you read the Old Testament, you’ll find that, when God gave the Jews the Promised Land, there was a nation already living there. So after a 40 year wait until there numbers rose, they invaded countries en route killing the inhabitants. They massacred the Moab nation including women and children.

Although there was anti-semitic feeling towards Jews in 1930s Germany, Jews worldwide put an embargo on German trade in 1934.

The main reason for hatred against the Jews down the centuries was usury. Christians were forbidden to lend money in exchange for interest. The big companies that went on to finance Hitler were originally Jewish owned.

I personally don’t like any religious group that advocates isolating themselves from other religious groups or non-believers. In the UK, the Salvation Army are esteemed by everyone, even atheists because of the work they do helping the homeless and destitute. In the 1950s U.S. tv shows promoted Jewish performers. Even Disney is now Jewish owned. 96% of the World media is owned by 6 Jewish companies. Entertainment agencies and film producers are nearly always Jewish. Nepotism is always unpopular to outsiders.

I’m not anti-semitic but their domination of finance worries me especially when they believe they are “the chosen people”.


Posted by Jeff L. on Sun, 08 Aug 2010 21:39 | #

Hitler feels the German (volk) are under represented since most Jews were very much better off because they were better.

True, Hitler ideology is for his people and in that standard even far before his time Alexander was also exulted by his people and historians today as The Great Alexander.

Why can’t Hilter be the great? Simple publicity of him and his works.

Stalin worked behind Lenin and later did what Hilter achieved twice as much but since he’s not public casted we didn’t see much of his macabre pogrom handiwork.

Mao Tze Tung is the worse of the two combined. Do your reseach how he did it.

How we judge others is really a mindset of how we are - not who we are. If we see the world as white and black we will judge others differently. Color is more vivid and transparent. If today we open the flood gate of America’s borders to foreigners our community will change abruptly. This sudden change, say, 10,000 Chinese living next to you can be very stressful because you have to deal with their present and they dominate that instance. Their success change you.

When you realized that you are now the under represented the political framework of Leftists and Rightists will shift because the hungry man is an angry man. You’re hiungry.


Posted by Gina on Sat, 25 Sep 2010 22:41 | #

The Jews are hated for so many reasons. The utmost being they murdered Christ. If you mention this fact to them, they will blame it on the Romans to escape persecution. Let’s also not forget that Eve tempted Adam with a little more than an apple to get him to betray God. What an evil little Jewish woman who over the years has still controlled the Jewish male with her less than visited genitals.

The Jews feel a sense of unwarranted entitlement. Most suffer from extreme delusion as they believe they are going to rule the world and everyone else is beneath them. They teach their women, if you can call them that, that they are “beautiful” and the most important in the world since birth. The sad part it, these women believe it and expect every other race to follow in their belief.

The Jewish mob in Chicago is notorious for promoting their incompetent, lonely women. They will even murder to get a man for their women.

Such is the case with Michael Rodrigo and Wendy Anderson. Michael was a successful man and after college he became a teacher. He was handsome and strong. Wendy’s mother notice Michael and wanted him to marry her little Jewess daughter Wendy. Michael declined, he was already in love with another woman and had hoped to make her his wife. Wendy and her mother were enraged, so they called out the Jewish Mob in Chicago and they descended on Mike telling him he would marry Wendy or his love interest would die.

Michael being the man he is, complied to free his love. For 30 years the little Jewess princess waited for Michael to come home and to acknowledge their marriage– he never did. One day after seeing his long lost love, he asked Wendy for a divorce. Immediately, she called the Jewish Mob in Chicago and they again descended. Wendy started a fight with Michael. Her daughter jumped on Michael’s back, Michael made an attempt to move away and Wendy was accidently struck. Wendy immediately brought charges against Michael for wife beating and the Jewish Mob made sure it stuck. He served time for a crime he never committed.

When Wendy testified at the hearing to have Michael convicted, she forgot to mention that her three children did not belong to Michael as they had never had sex and that she could not have biological children because she did not have the ability to get pregnant. Instead, she was visited by the Jewish “Impregnator” and performed a sick sexual ritual to obtain three stolen children who grew up to be as evil as she.

When he was released, he tried to take his old love out of the clutches of the Jewish Mob who had repeatedly beaten and raped her over the years–they refused to let her go. Instead, they held Michael and fractured his spine leaving him in a wheelchair permanently.

Today, Michael is in a wheelchair and Wendy has moved on to prostitution. The Jewish mob is still tormenting his love.

The Jewish Mob is notorious for threatening men who are in love with other women to get them to marry their lonely, Jewish women. They are so desperate they will threaten with murder.

This was also the case with Cahal O’Flaherty and Tracy Peterson in Chicago. Tracy wanted Cahal so the Jewish mob threatened his girlfriend and Cahal ended up marrying Tracy. Yes, they are now divorced and Tracy is miserable. I have heard Cahal went on to meet his old love and is now happy.

Chicago is loaded with little Jewish girls who are set up in law offices as fake lawyers to appease them so they can pretend they are executives to get men. The Jewish mob caters to these wicked women and they expect everyone else to do the same. When they do not, they are murdered, tortured, raped, deformed or missing.

Jews will always be outcast among nations because of their rejection of God and the “things they do”.


Posted by Prem on Sat, 16 Oct 2010 15:19 | #

@Gina..Seems that your views are very much affected by the facts from distant history. The history which was written not once, the history which doesn’t have a proof. The history which does not hold any significance in minds of millions of common people, who today have far more important issues about their lives than to worry about what the Jewish women were 2000 years ago. Or what the great imaginary eve wished.
Please understand, you are spreading hatred which will give birth to more hatred. People should be liked or disliked based on their deeds and not on what their ancestors did.
The Chicago story you framed was very interesting and might influence a few too. But do u think that the US laws are so weak and the US media so ignorant to not even notice it.
My aim is not to hate u for ur way of thinking but to make u realise that the humanity survives on trust. Hatred ends the trust.
This is what is happening in India… betweens the Hindus and Muslims, hatred being spread within both communities. 1000’s of innocent lives lost in past 60 years, ,just because a few people liked hating others…

If the God exists even he would be afraid to come near us… Never know when a stone would hit him or a bullet would pass through his head, claiming that he was the God of the other religion….


Posted by oilgod on Sat, 20 Nov 2010 06:11 | #

Hitler, Germany, the Jews and all that goes with it deserves a rest. Move on to current day problems.

Disappearing resources will drive everyone into survival groups that will have them completely forget any philosophical restrains, making the so called “holocaust” a mere preview, and a sample of wholesale genocide. from 6.5 Billion humans now to less than 1 Billion by 2100. Find your own people now and work at helping them survive the coming resource wars. Any other approach would be suicidal -


Posted by Jake on Thu, 06 Jan 2011 01:56 | #

Jews are more successful and prominent than other groups for the simple reason that they are superior to them.  The Jews have by far contributed more to the world in science, medicine, technology, and all intellectual fields than any other group—an extraordinary feat given the endless discrimination, enslavement, and pogroms to which they have been subjected over centuries.

Germany started both World Wars and should be ashamed of its pathetic, barbaric history of tribal war and aggression.  Far from being crippled by the Versailles Treaty, German reparations were publicized at three times the number the Allies ever intended on collecting—and six times what they actually did collect.  The Germans transferred 2% of their total national income to the Allies as reparations from 1919-31, while foreign aid amounted to 5.3% of that income.  Their was a net flow of cash in to Germany from the Allies; the victors paid the bills from the war Germany imposed on them.  The inflation in Germany from 1919 to 1923 was, like all inflation, caused by the German government itself, which massively printed money to finance the WW1 slaughter and continued doing so as a pretext to obstruct reparations.  The situation stabilized after the adoption of the Reichsmark in 1924; Chancellor Stresemann warned the Germans that the were living on “borrowed money” in 1928, before the Great Depression collapsed the world economy.  Recovery was already well underway by the time the Nazis took power.

The Nazis methodically tracked the progress of the Holocaust in thousands of reports and documents. See, for example, the Höfle Telegram sent to Adolf Eichmann in January, 1943, which reported that 1,274,166 Jews had been killed in the four Aktion Reinhard camps during 1942 alone.  Estimates of the total number of Jews killed by the Nazis range from 5.1 million from Raul Hilberg, to 5.95 million from Jacob Leschinsky. Yisrael Gutman and Robert Rozett in the Encyclopedia of the Holocaust estimate 5.59–5.86 million.  A study led by Wolfgang Benz of the Technical University of Berlin suggests 5.29–6.2 million.  The main sources for these statistics are comparisons of prewar and postwar censuses and population estimates, and Nazi documentation on deportations and murders.

This is not the work of a rational actor:

The ignorant, barely literate fringe deniers that post here are the filth of the world.  The names and countries of orgin for 3 million of the total 5.8 million Jews killed have already been established and documentation on this matter is still being conducted.  Internal Nazi documents repeatedly refer to the gas chambers and the death of millions of Jews.  Not even the Nazis at Nuremberg dared to simply deny what they had done!  It is an irrefutable demographic fact that simply cannot be contested—several million Jews disappeared at the hands of the Nazis.  No calculation of excess mortality ever conducted has ever or could ever reach a different conclusion.  There are many millions of Jews who went “missing,” and no reasonable person can evade this hard, census-based fact.  Nearly 80% of the Jews under Nazi control were killed.  I have met Holocaust survivors.  As one survivor sardonically remarked, glancing at his camp serial number, “I am a survivor of the Hoax of the Twentieth Century.”

The Nazis killed 16% of the population of Poland.  In total, they were responsible for the deaths of 30 million people.

Louis Rapoport (Stalin’s War Against The Jews: The Doctors’ Plot And The Soviet Solution, New York: Free Press, 1990) has written a detailed account of the Stalin’s actions against the Jews. He states that after the Molotov-Ribbentrop pact “one of Stalin’s first gifts to the Nazis was to turn over some 600 German Communists, most of them Jews, to the Gestapo at Brest-Litovsk in German-occupied Poland.” He continues, “Beginning in February 1940 in the Soviet-occupied zone of Poland, Beria’s NKVD arrested and deported about one million Polish refugees, half of them Jews. Many died en route to Siberia.”  In relation to the 1953 Doctors’ Plot, Rapoport states that the plan was to first execute the doctors under the fictitious charges and “then ‘incidents’ would follow: attacks on Jews orchestrated by the secret police, the publication of the statement by the prominent Jews, and a flood of other letters demanding that action be taken. A three­stage program of genocide would be followed. First, almost all Soviet Jews… would be shipped to camps east of the Urals… Second, the authorities would set Jewish leaders at all levels against one another… Also the MGB [Secret Police] would start killing the elites in the camps, just as they had killed the Yiddish writers … the previous year. The… final stage would be to ‘get rid of the rest.’”

It is chilling to read the deniers of these facts hysterically wonder why the hundreds of scholarly works on the Nazis dismiss their incoherent conspiracy theories and fail to give their blog posts “due weight” in the “controversy” over the destruction of the European Jews.  More incredible is the unbelievable assertion that Israel, of all countries, has failed to develop or modernize rapidly enough and is reliant on US aid!  (The history of Israel’s extraorinary success is nothing short of a miracle.)  Equally delusional are the claims that England was an aggressive, expansionist power while Nazi Germany was diligently committed to appeasement with London.  When whites are more successful than blacks, no one here suggests a “white conspiracy,” but when the consensus of scholars reflects the demographic facts of reality, it is seen as a “Jewish plot.”  The world is not fundamentally unjust—the Jews outperform you, not because the odds favor them, but in spite of the odds against them, and because they are by far the most evolved ethnic group on the earth.

It’s difficult to fathom the enormity of Jewish achievement in the face of great odds, and nearly impossible to conceive of the depths of Jewish suffering at the hands of the Nazis, so it is easy for rednecks like these vulgar fools to dismiss it as “impossible.”  Look on Wikipedia at the lists of famous Jews by country, and then at the 3 million names so far established by Holocaust researchers, and imagine what those 5.8 million Jews would have accomplished had Hitler not exterminated them for no reason.

One last observation:  We have not seen a single Jew blow himself up in a German restaraunt.


Posted by Captainchaos on Thu, 06 Jan 2011 05:29 | #


Jews are more successful and prominent than other groups for the simple reason that they are superior to them.

In America European-American individuals with IQ 130+ outnumber Jewish individuals with IQ 130+ 7:1.  Yet Jews typically make up 25-30% of undergrads at Harvard.  Let us take the latter as representative of Jewish “success” and ask, Is this due simply to superior Jewish intellect and work ethic?  No, clearly not.  The numbers just don’t ‘add up’.  So what accounts for this obvious Jewish over representation out of all proportion to actual Jewish talents?  Ethnic nepotism.

an extraordinary feat given the endless discrimination, enslavement, and pogroms to which they have been subjected over centuries.

It would seem that they would not have been able to achieve said were their history nothing but a tale of woe.  Jews emerged from the role of tax-collecting middle-men for the European aristocracy to emancipation and great collective success in a European context.  Would this have been imaginable under Islam or in sub-Saharan Africa?  Clearly not.  Your overly lachrymose rendition of Jewish history vis-a-vis Europeans wouldn’t be an attempt to induce guilt in those of European descent to the effect that Europeans take a dim view of looking after their own interests yet find moral redemption in serving Jewish interests, would it?  Perhaps you don’t think of it that way consciously, yet it could reasonably be interpreted as such.

Estimates of the total number of Jews killed by the Nazis range from 5.1 million from Raul Hilberg, to 5.95 million from Jacob Leschinsky.

The official death toll at Auschwitz has been reduced from 4 million to 1.1 million.  If these 2.9 million victims were not killed at Auschwitz then where were they killed?  Funny how it all takes on the aspect of a shell game, no?

The ignorant, barely literate fringe deniers that post here are the filth of the world.

Wouldn’t you say that Jew Lazar Kaganovitch and his predominantly Jewish NKVD secret policemen who oversaw the systematic starvation of 6 million Ukrainians are “the filth of the world”?  But we shouldn’t concern ourselves with that, should we?  Jews are after all “superior” and their lives are therefore more precious than those of the ‘goyim’.  Jews: only ever angelic in their “superiority”, ever the victims and never the victimizers.

More incredible is the unbelievable assertion that Israel, of all countries, has failed to develop or modernize rapidly enough and is reliant on US aid!


Then I take it Israel can do without this aid.


Posted by Hail on Thu, 06 Jan 2011 08:56 | #

Jake wrote:
1,274,166 Jews had been killed in the four Aktion Reinhard camps during 1942 alone

2-minute video on excavations at the Treblinka site (Treblinka was one of the “Aktion Reinhard” camps).

See also: “One Third of the Holocaust


Posted by MOB on Thu, 06 Jan 2011 12:41 | #

Hitler and the Germans hated the Jews for the same reason that all haters of Jews hate them

Jews take over.

It’s that simple.

It has always mystified me when people ask, “how could a nation that was at the very apex of achievement in all areas of accomplishment behave so barbarously toward the Jews?”

How simple does it get?  IIf Germany were a mediocre country with mediocre dreams and mediocre achievement, the termite-like Jewish takeover with its inevitable cheapening of the culture and manipulation of all areas affecting personal and national financial stability would not have caused the extreme pain, anger and fear of loss that it did cause.

Jewish values and German values were and remain diametrically opposed.

Today the lands in which the Jew has taken over are cultural cesspools and financial plantations—the work of Jews, wherever they gain a foothold.

Jews are only “superior” to those who share their values.  I long for a Jew-free environment.  I long for Jews to be exposed, punished, and exorcised.

The Jews and their lies.  By way of deception.  Nothing has changed, nor will it ever change.

Jews take over.  And having taken over, they impose their own inferior values on the conquered land.  Life becomes less worth living.  Jews smear shit on Beauty.  Jews kill spirits.

I think this is why Hitler hated Jews.


Posted by danielj on Thu, 06 Jan 2011 14:39 | #

Jews emerged from the role of tax-collecting middle-men for the European aristocracy to emancipation and great collective success in a European context.

And, ironically, considering their current relationship to war as protesters-in-chief, they were also solitary and spectacularly profitable arms dealers during intra-European conflict.


Posted by John on Thu, 06 Jan 2011 19:37 | #

“That part of the world under Hitler’s control in general willingly assisted in rounding up Jews while the rest of the world refused to take Jewish refugees who tried to escape…”

First they came for the Socialists, and I did not speak out—
Because I was not a Socialist.

Then they came for the Trade Unionists, and I did not speak out—
Because I was not a Trade Unionist.

Then they came for the Jews, and I said, there they are, right over there—
What took you guys so long?


Posted by Jake on Thu, 06 Jan 2011 23:34 | #

The “official” death count of Auschwitz as worked out by investigators from all sides after the war using census figures, train transportation lists, personal accounts and other figures kept by the Nazi regime was a figure of 1-2 million which after 60 years is still considered fairly accurate.

While Poland was part of the Communist regime a plaque was erected at Auschwitz stating that 4 million victims of the Nazis were killed there. This was part of an ongoing propaganda campaign to show what the Communists were fighting against. This figure of 4 million was never used to estimate the total number of people killed in the Holocaust.

Since the collapse of Communism the plaque has been removed and replaced with one stating the correct figures.

Unfortunately Holocaust deniers have, as always, seized on anything they can to try and “prove” their beliefs.

More significant is the assumption that killing “only” 3 million Jews would be unobjectionable, but 6 million is beyond the pale.

the systematic starvation of 6 million Ukrainians…

As denial of the Holocaust is nonfactual, another common strategy of historical revisionism is to use relativism by comparing it to other genocides.

No serious historian questions that the Holocaust took place.  Holocaust survivor and Nobel Prize winner Elie Wiesel calls the Holocaust “the most documented tragedy in recorded history. Never before has a tragedy elicited so much witness from the killers, from the victims and even from the bystanders—millions of pieces here in the museum what you have, all other museums, archives in the thousands, in the millions.”

Critics of Holocaust denial also include members of the Auschwitz SS. Camp physician and SS-Untersturmführer Hans Münch considered the facts of Auschwitz “so firmly determined that one cannot have any doubt at all,” and described those who negate what happened at the camp as “malevolent” people who have “personal interest to want to bury in silence things that cannot be buried in silence.”  Zyklon-B handler and SS-Oberscharführer Josef Klehr has said that anyone who maintains that nobody was gassed at Auschwitz must be “crazy or on the wrong”.  Hearing about Holocaust denial compelled former SS-Rottenführer Oskar Gröning to publicly speak about what he witnessed at Auschwitz, and denounce Holocaust deniers, stating:  “I would like you to believe me. I saw the gas chambers. I saw the crematoria. I saw the open fires. I was on the ramp when the selections took place. I would like you to believe that these atrocities happened because I was there.”

Many deniers question the death toll of the Holocaust, arguing that the numbers are highly inflated.  Simple demographic evidence effectively rebuts this argument. Deniers claim that many Jews simply emigrated elsewhere, but there are no corresponding population increases in other countries that would support this argument. While it is possible that hundreds, or even thousands of people could “fall through the cracks,” that still leaves several million Jews unaccounted for.

Jews emerged from the role of tax-collecting middle-men for the European aristocracy to emancipation and great collective success in a European context. Would this have been imaginable under Islam or in sub-Saharan Africa?  Clearly not.

On the one hand, I agree 100% with that astute observation, but I puzzle over your misrepresentation of my views.  I never used the word EUROPEAN when describing the historical persecution of Jews.

Hail, your propaganda video was so over-the-top, it would have been hilarious, if it wasn’t for the somber nature of this reality.

I long for a Jew-free environment.  I long for Jews to be exposed, punished, and exorcised.

Note that Jews would never utter such an obscenity about any group, even Germans or Moslems.  People like you should be shot on the spot.

The sad truth is that it would be just as easy to construct a “compelling” narrative “proving” that the famine in Ukraine was a hoax, as the far-left has been trying to do for decades.

In the end, the rightists who post here are the ultimate enemies of capitalism.  Unable to compete with Jews in a market devoid of coercion, they advocate the use of force to enslave them, claiming self-defense against an imaginary conspiracy based on the Protocols.  Your struggle is a struggle against reason, a desire to make reality mold itself to your will through sheer belief, an overly emotionalist campaign against justice itself.  Obviously, no facts, no arguments, no amount of evidence could ever convince our “open-minded” dissenters that they are mistaken.

One last point:  Israel, per capita, is the most creative and innovative country on the face of the earth.

Since 1991, venture capital in Israel has increased sixtyfold. Israel has become an extension of Silicon Valley that is excelling its source. It is a paragon of defense-technology innovation. In 2008, a study by Deloitte and Touche showed that Israel has become the world’s chief fount of innovation outside the U.S. in such fields as microchips, telecom, software, biotech, medical devices, and cleantech. Only Germany is close, and they are ten times larger.


Posted by Hail on Fri, 07 Jan 2011 02:54 | #

Jake wrote:
Jews would never utter such an obscenity about any group, even Germans or Moslems.

“Every Jew, somewhere in his being, should set apart a zone of hate—healthy, virile hate—for what the German personifies and for what persists in the German.” 

— High Priest of Holocaustianity Elie Wiesel, in his book Legends of Our Time.


Posted by Ivan on Fri, 07 Jan 2011 05:01 | #

It was the other way around - it was the Jew who hated Hitler back then and, to this day, he hates everything related to Hitler. Hitler simply wanted to get rid of the parasites. Taking into account what they did to Germany, could you blame the Führer?

Hate is a manifestation of weakness. Hate is a corrosive feeling of powerlessness confronted by powerful enemy. Hate is a humiliating feeling of inferiority in the presence of a superior being. That’s why Niggers hate Whites.

Hate is an uncontrollable feeling of envy by the immoral and wicked in the presence of the wholesome and noble. That’s why Jews hate goyim.

Hate is unhealthy feeling of small confronted by big. Hate is a lot of little men and the Jews. Hitler was neither a Jew nor a little man.

You do not lionize the bastards by hating them, you do not hate your mortal enemies - you simply destroy them without mercy.

Here is a guy who didn’t talk in terms of hate, but he didn’t shy away from expressing himself in no uncertain terms. He didn’t mince his words as of what should be done with the bastards:

Arbeit Macht Frei: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-D7APJ4dr78&NR=1


Posted by Captainchaos on Fri, 07 Jan 2011 08:36 | #


I will have to acknowledge your more comprehensive grasp of the traditional Holocaust narrative.  It is not something I have taken the time, nor frankly have the inclination at present, to look into.  That said, I see no reason it cannot and should not be questioned.  It is not cause for or symptom of a pathology if one wishes to or does do this; and to the contrary of the quotes you so insidiously pepper your commentary with to leave just that impression.  Think about it: isn’t it absurd on its face that those who deny Jews were murdered because they were Jews, or question the number of those murdered, are in the dark corners of their own hearts genocidal Jew-haters?  That they wish to clear the names of their co-ethnics of that which is shameful is evidence that they in actuality think what their co-ethnics are alleged to have done is not shameful?  Then why bother to attempt this exculpation at all if they themselves believe the extermination of Jews is not shameful?  Well, I suppose the straight forward answer is that they, suffering some alleged deep-seated pathology as you so slyly insinuate, do not think the extermination of Jews is shameful but realize the majority of their co-ethnics DO consider said shameful.  So what, assuming this is their mind-set, are deniers of the Holocaust trying to achieve?  Merely to lift the weight of this guilt from the shoulders of their co-ethics in the recognition that it is indeed injurious to their co-ethnic?  Or is it the more sinister motivation of attempting to lull their co-ethnics asleep that they may once again gain power and exterminate the Jews?  If the latter, it would seem that their co-ethnics are of a better moral fiber than they in that their co-ethnics would never be taken in by an explicit call to genocide.  That being the case, why then this obvious need on your part, and that of your own co-ethnics, to wield the traditional Holocaust narrative as a bludgeon with which you beat into submission any last expression of ethnic assertiveness on the part of not only Germans but indeed all those of European descent?  Is it because you truly believe that also within most Europeans lurks the spirit of genocidalism?  It is here we reach the true crux of the matter, Jake.  If you do hold such a low and fearful opinion of Europeans then why in the name of “G-d” would you, or any of your own co-ethnics, wish to live amongst Europeans?  Are you bloody mad?  I don’t think you are bloody mad.  I hope not.  So why then this incessant guilt-mongering on your part?  What are you, and your own co-ethnics, driving at?  The answer that suggests itself is that you wish to cow Europeans as consistent with perceived Jewish interests.  And that now in a time when, present trends persisting, European Man will pass from the pages of history.  You should fully realize, Jake, that such a tack is itself genocidal in its effect, if not intent.  I do not think you wish to be cast in the role of a genocidalist, Jake.  I do not wish to believe you are bloody mad.  But are you?

It would certainly behoove you, Jake, as the forthright man you undoubtedly are, to respond directly to the above as we both of us know (yes, you do know it too) this is not simply a matter of a desire for historical accuracy.


Posted by Silver on Fri, 07 Jan 2011 08:57 | #


I hope you have another strategy up your sleeve when hysterically protesting “too much” in the hopes of frightening people into agreeing you stops working so well. 

As one survivor sardonically remarked, glancing at his camp serial number, “I am a survivor of the Hoax of the Twentieth Century.”  Oh I’m just sure that happened— they’re so well known for their resigned, sardonic reactions to accusations of mendacity, those Holocaust Survivors (especially the ones who played with wolves while hiding under the floorboards, or however it goes).  This one gets bonus points for managing to work in a reference to one of the pioneering works of holocaust skepticism.

Such a pity that for all your brilliance you have to resort to such rank bullshit, because these “judeoskeptic” types—you’ve seen them here, like “MOB”—are the infernal demon assholes of your and my worst fears.  But you don’t beat them by providing more grist for their mill.


Posted by Captainchaos on Fri, 07 Jan 2011 09:41 | #


I think Jake is too shrewd and self-confident an ethic customer to be shaken with that level of discourse.  Something perhaps you would have realized were you Nordic.  (Just kidding.  Well, sort of.)  Let us see if he has the courage which reflects his self-conception by his responding directly to me as I have asked him.  I’m not holding my breath.  But who knows, I may be pleasantly surprised.

The bottom line: Either he supports the right of European-derived peoples to exist or not.  And if not, then he is every bit the genocidalist in spirit he believes the Nazis to have been in fact.  That is the one, true and only subtext here.  I have merely brought it to the foreground.  Ain’t (sorry, I’m a simple “redneck”, I couldn’t resist) that right, Jake?


Posted by Al Ross on Fri, 07 Jan 2011 10:19 | #

The Holohoax nonsense matters because if that filthy Jewish mythology continues to infect our people the legitimacy of our judenfrei aspirations will for ever be pathologised.

It doesn’t really matter which of our additional racial enemies the Jews wish to import via Third World immigration. They will all have to be dealt with sooner or later and this will require Hitlerian resolve, like it or not.


Posted by Jake on Sat, 08 Jan 2011 02:27 | #


You have a very conspiracy-minded worldview, and this reflected in your recent post.

I did not come here looking for a racist website.  I was just intrigued by the parts of Mein Kampf in which Hitler talks about his earlier sympathy for the Jewish people, as well as accounts of his friendship with several Jews even during his years at Vienna, and happened to stumble upon it while researching what made Hitler anti-Semitic.

Now, I do not expect much from this site after having read it’s genocide denial manifesto (http://wiki.majorityrights.com/holocaust), which claims that, among other reasons, the Holocaust could not have happened because:  The Nazis forced the Jews to wear uniforms (“why bother, if you’re exterminating them?” it seriously asks), President Carter supported national research into it, one encyclopedia from decades ago allegedly did not use the phrase Holocaust to describe it, Hollywood promotes it, and “the Jews won’t allow an investigation” of it—before equating Auschwitz with Dresden, recycling Nazi propaganda about the Jewish “stab in the back,” and blaming Jewish deaths in the camps on Allied bombing.

Clearly, the people who wrote that denial tract are vulgar buffoons, and it remains an embarrassment to whatever credibility this site may have had left.  Clearly, majorityrights.com is home to many anti-intellectual European Jew-haters (and not as many Americans, who have been vaccinated against genocidal anti-Semitism).  Outside of you and the author of the above article, I’ve seen little intelligent comment on these pages.

But, as I’ve hinted already, I am a racist.  I have no doubts whatever that the natural order of things should be undisturbed, that “diversity” is an unnatural phenomenon.  Of course whites are more civilized and intelligent than blacks; black men have raped nearly half a million white American women in the past decade, while white men have raped less than 100 black American women during that time.

The racism of this site is jingoistic, emotionalist, and pseudo-intellectual in nature.  Jew-hatred itself is the number one hatred of pseudo-intellectuals—it is, as Christopher Hitchens observes, an unwarranted “collective hallucination” more than a form of racism.

The intellectually curious naturally see through the absurd claim that races do not exist in the human species; even the deniers know, recognize, and act on the premise that they do.  However, scientific analysis cannot support the claim that whites or Germans are the most evolved ethnic group.  Jews are the most evolved, with an average IQ of 115.  They are followed by the East Asians (with an average IQ of 110) and the gentile whites (with an average IQ of 100).

The Africans are scarcely members of the same species.  Some experts have argued for four human races:  three different African races, and everybody else.  One ethnic group in the Congo has an average IQ of 50.

I’m basically a mild and tolerant racist like John Derbyshire.  I’m not a white supremacist, but of course I support the right of white people to exist.  I’d even support the British National Party if it wasn’t anti-Semitic.

You read far too deeply into my motivation for not denying the Nazi Holocaust.  My reason is much simpler:  It happened, and denying that fact is like killing its victims twice.


Posted by jamesUK on Sat, 08 Jan 2011 03:41 | #


Don’t tell me you like that big shit Hitler who through his BS wars wanted to create a German/British empire in Europe in the process killing millions of white people which he outlined in his unpublished/untitled foreign policy book which was discovered in the German archives in the US and published in Germany in 1958 then internationally in 2003.

“There are a number of similarities and differences between Zweites Buch and Mein Kampf. As in Mein Kampf, Hitler declared that the Jews were his eternal and most dangerous opponents. As in Mein Kampf, Hitler outlined what the German historian Andreas Hillgruber has called his Stufenplan (“stage-by-stage plan”). Hitler himself never used the term Stufenplan, which was coined by Hillgruber in his 1965 book Hitlers Strategie. Briefly, the Stufenplan called for three stages. In the first stage, there would be a massive military build-up, the overthrow of the “shackles” of the Treaty of Versailles, and the forming of alliances with Fascist Italy and the British Empire. The second stage would be a series of fast, “lightning wars” in conjunction with Italy and Britain against France and whichever of her allies in Eastern Europe — such as Czechoslovakia, Poland, Romania and Yugoslavia — chose to stand by her. The third stage would be a war to obliterate what Hitler considered to be the “Judeo-Bolshevik” regime in the Soviet Union.

In contrast to Mein Kampf, in Zweites Buch Hitler added a fourth stage to the Stufenplan. He announced that, around 1980, the final struggle for world domination would take place between the United States and the now Greater Germany allied with the British Empire. Zweites Buch also offers a different perspective on the United States than that outlined in Mein Kampf. In the latter, Hitler declared that Germany’s most dangerous opponent on the international scene was the Soviet Union; In Zweites Buch, Hitler declared that for immediate purposes, the Soviet Union was still the most dangerous opponent, but that in the long-term, the most dangerous potential opponent was the United States.”




Posted by jamesUK on Sat, 08 Jan 2011 04:11 | #


”The sad truth is that it would be just as easy to construct a “compelling” narrative “proving” that the famine in Ukraine was a hoax, as the far-left has been trying to do for decades”

But the Holomodor propaganda hoax was debunked at the time itself based on Nazi propaganda and that of fascist media baron William Randolph Hearst and was regarded as such by every mainstream historian until the 1980’s when it was resurrected during Reagans anti-Communist campaign based on the book Harvest of Sorrows by Robert Conquest who worked for British Foreign Offices post WW2 anti-Communist propaganda unit IRD and financed by Ukrainian nationalist groups in Canada and the US to finance the “documentary” Harvest of Despair.

Given the overwhelming evidence that debunk the engineered famine narrative like the fact that most killed were in the Russian East not nationalist west, 6 million is a high estimate that does not take into account decline in birth rates, large outbreaks of disease, periodic famines up to 32, that the pictures used in Holomodor propaganda are from the Volga famine and that it effected other regions of the USSR Kazakhstan, Siberia and the Caucasus and not limited to Ukraine just to name a few facts. 

And it is not leftists that are doing serious research by serious a-political Soviet historians with no political affiliation or institutions.

Even Robert Conquest now has retracted his view that it was engineered.


Posted by Ivan on Sat, 08 Jan 2011 04:44 | #

The bottom line: Either he supports the right of European-derived peoples to exist or not.


Please forgive my stupidity: what is the meaning of the above quote? I will narrow my question even further: what does the right of European-derived peoples to exist mean?

‘Right’ is a legal term which means something that is protected and guarantied by the law. Which law guaranties, or could even guarantee, the right of European-derived peoples, or any people for that matter, to exist. If such law and executive body that guaranties the rights set in that law exist, why do we have to have armies? Why every country and every nation on Earth from time immemorial has been trying to have as much armament as they can afford?

Did the American Indians have the right to exist? If so, why did they disappear? When the total human population shoots over the threshold that can be supported by the limited resources of planet Earth, what happens to that law? Do we come with a new law that stipulates who has the right to exist and who has not? And if that law says that I do not have the right, why would I agree with such a law?

What is the significance of knowing whether Jake supports the right of European-derived peoples to exist or not? What would he, or even could he, do to support such a right? Have you ever met, or even heard of, a person who would say: No, I don’t think European-derived peoples have the right to exist?

And if Jake happens to believe that he and his kin would be better off without European-derived peoples around, why would you expect him to say so in your face, instead of quitely doing everything he possibly could to make the threat, real or perceived, go away? Wouldn’t that be the height of stupidity for Jake to do so?

Do you catch my drift, Captainchaos?


Posted by Hail on Sat, 08 Jan 2011 04:51 | #

Jake wrote:
I’d even support the British National Party if it wasn’t anti-Semitic.



That position, it just doesn’t make any sense. For more than one reason.de


Posted by Ivan on Sat, 08 Jan 2011 04:58 | #

Don’t tell me you like that big shit Hitler

Well, jamesUK, it would be very strange, to say the least, for me to like somebody who wanted to take the land from the people who brought me to life.


Posted by Ivan on Sat, 08 Jan 2011 05:09 | #

I’d even support the British National Party if it wasn’t anti-Semitic.

Being anti-Semitic would be the best part of the BNP - to the degree it is anti-Semitic, which I am not quite sure. If it is anti-Semitic indeed, the party is not doing good enough job communicating it to the public.


Posted by Jake on Sat, 08 Jan 2011 06:05 | #

This is jaw-dropping:  Not only are there Holocaust deniers here, it turns out there are Holodomor deniers as well!

Far from changing his view, Conquest declared “I told you so!” after the Soviet archives were opened.  Our Stalinist friend here actually invokes the Soviet starvation of one-third of the population of Kazakhstan as evidence that they had no genocidal intent.  Further, he notes that Ukraine had experienced famine in the twenties as well.


“The famine was concentrated in the rich grain-growing provinces of southern Ukraine, an area inhabited by about a third of the republic’s 26 million citizens. It affected both the rural and the urban population. Most of the victims were Ukrainians; national minorities like Germans, Jews and Russians also suffered. Between the fall of 1921 and the spring of 1923, 1.5 million to 2 million people died of starvation and due to accompanying epidemics.

Saving this population would have required no more than half a million tons of grain or equivalent foodstuffs per year. During the two years of the famine, the Bolshevik government took from Ukrainian peasants many times that amount. Most of the confiscated grain was shipped abroad: the first year to Russia, and the second to Russia and the West. Ukraine was also obliged to send additional “voluntary” famine relief to the Volga, and to feed some 2 million people who came from Russia as refugees, soldiers and administrators.

At the time of the famine, many witnesses recorded the tragedy, and some of them even hinted at its criminal nature. But the passage of time dulled the memory of succeeding generations, and subsequent publications dealing with Ukraine and the Soviet Union said little of substance about this particular disaster.”

Recent demographic studies estimate that about 4 million Ukrainians were starved by Soviet grain confiscations in the thirties:  Sergei Maksudov, “Victory Over the Peasantry,” Harvard Ukrainian Studies, Fall 2001.

In 1932 – 33 Stalin caused numerous deaths by acts of omission. He omitted to appeal for or accept international help, although this was proposed by the Ukrainian president in February 1932.  He also omitted to import grain. His crime of omission is accepted by Davies and Wheatcroft. In 1932 – 33 Stalin also caused numerous deaths by acts of commission.  Numerous deportees and camp and prison inmates—victims of a major Stalinist policy—died. Grain which might have been used to feed the starving population was exported. Peasants who tried to flee from famine-stricken Ukraine and North Caucasus were turned back.

James denies that there was criminal intent – even though the Soviets confiscated grain from the starving, deprived villages of supplies, blocked outside assistance and deliberately trapped the victims!

Here is a piece debunking the notorious Soviet-sponsored denial tract:



Posted by Leon Haller on Sat, 08 Jan 2011 12:46 | #


Interesting posts, though you started off on the completely wrong foot, with this crap:

Jews are more successful and prominent than other groups for the simple reason that they are superior to them.  The Jews have by far contributed more to the world in science, medicine, technology, and all intellectual fields than any other group—an extraordinary feat given the endless discrimination, enslavement, and pogroms to which they have been subjected over centuries.

Germany started both World Wars and should be ashamed of its pathetic, barbaric history of tribal war and aggression.

I’m of German heritage, but an old-stock American. I do not deny the Holocaust. I do dislike Jewish assertions of superiority, not only for ethnic reasons, but because they are so obviously false. In my Ivy League university, Jews were certainly overrepresented, in both students and faculty, but Captainchaos hit the nail: ethnic nepotism is the reason, something at which Jews are the world’s masters (and whites the world’s losers - that is our greatness and our folly - it is we Aryans who are ethically superior to all other groups, including Jews). (Also, Jews are much more driven than ordinary whites to garner “elite” credentials.) Jews were hardly the best students. They were generally good debaters and discussants, but only to a point. They liked intellectual discussions on average more than the Gentiles, but they certainly were not as good as the best of us (I won the public speaking prize for my year, not a Jew; I and several other non-Jewish whites were faculty-selected writing tutors; only one Jew in our group; on the other hand, a Jewish pal of mine won the freshman essay prize). They had all the requisite mannerisms of “intellectuals” (I mean the preeners; some Jews were perfectly normal guys, no different from the whites in their behavior and outlook), but dig under the surface, and there was little solid cognitive substance. Most of the summa cum laude graduates of my class were white, btw, not Asian, and not Jewish (though the “Chosen” comprised more than a quarter of my class).

Historically, Jews have not contributed much to human civilization, except in the religious field, where they were the greatest innovators. Jews have made real contributions to the world (unlike blacks), but your hyperbolic statements show tremendous ignorance of history, including intellectual and scientific history. Historically, Jews contributed relatively little to most fields, from pure sciences to technology to philosophy to literature (Jewish contribution to art is nearly nonexistent). The vast bulk of Jewish intellectual achievement occurred since the Enlightenment. You will say this was due to emancipation, but that is only partly true. There were great Jewish philosophers (Maimonides, Spinoza), but not very many (and prejudice was not a factor). No prejudice could have stopped the formation of a canon of Jewish literature, but what there does exist in that regard is not impressive (until the 20th century - but then one gets into the ethnic nepotism thing again: Proust was great, possibly Kafka, too, though that is aesthetically debatable: but Joseph Heller, Mailer, Roth, etc? there is a lot of Jewish PR in those and many other literary Jews’ reputations).

I could go one, but I fear you are only superficially acquainted with the subject upon which you are comfortably pontificating (a very Jewish trait, btw). Why don’t you educate yourself a bit? Read:

Harry Elmer Barnes, An Intellectual and Cultural History of the Western World (3vols)

Charles Murray (a very philosemiticic conservative), Human Accomplishment

Daniel Boorstin (a Jew), The Discoverers, The Creators, The Seekers

Jews really did NOT accomplish all that much historically. The great exception is commercial and especially financial enterprise. In that field, Jewish success, proportionately speaking, is unparalleled (though most real industry has been the product of whites). And, Jews might accomplish much more in the future.

Finally, whatever the German guilt for WW2, Germans most certainly bear no more guilt for WW1 than any other European great power. You are making an assertion rejected by the whole of contemporary historiography. Also, your statements about Israeli productivity are wildly overstated. If it were so, why does Israel need so much US and German foreign aid? America and Germany have basically paid for the jewish state over the past half century. Also, Israel receives an incredible annual amount of private American Jewish support. I’m not certain how well Israel would due or have done in the absence of that aid (unlike Japan and especially Germany, who built themselves up postwar overwhelmingly on their own, despite some initial help from the US).


Posted by Leon Haller on Sat, 08 Jan 2011 12:55 | #

PS - sorry for my several typos above. But my meaning should be clear throughout.

Also, I am not a supporter of anti-Semitism, believing it to be a distraction from the real issues of racial survival facing Europeans, which involve the lethal errors of allowing mass nonwhite immigration, while simultaneously adopting race-denialism and ethical multiculturalism. On the other hand, I have no special love of Jews, unlike some obsequious ‘conservatives’, and believe as a matter of strictly objective history that the presence of Jewry in America and the West has been politically destructive of white interests.


Posted by Hail on Sat, 08 Jan 2011 16:38 | #

Leon Haller wrote:
I do not deny the Holocaust.

If you define it properly, there are no Holocaust-deniers on Earth.

Were Jews rounded up and detained and otherwise mistreated? Yes.
Did many Jews (and others) suffer in German concentration camps? Yes.
Did many Jews die during the period 1941-1945? Yes.
Were there deliberate killings of Jews by Europeans, 1941-1945? Yes.

If anyone denies any of the above, they are fools indeed.

The three harder questions:
1 — Was there an “physical extermination plan” guided by NSDAP functionaries and ordered by Hitler? There is no evidence for this. Evidence presented is almost limited to an interpretation of a handful of bureaucrats’ “Wannsee Conference”, where the phrase “Final Solution” [Endloesung] was uttered. In context it is a clear reference to the idea of eventual resettlement of European-Jewry outside Europe, to Palestine or elsewhere.
2 — Did Six Million Jews die? Honest demographic analyses using available records indicate that fewer than 1.5 million Jews died, two-thirds of them in German-occupied Europe (the lion’s share of these died in the camps). (200,000 were killed in the field while wearing Red-Army uniforms according to Soviet records; several hundred thousand in the harsh conditions of Soviet temporary housing in Siberia after evacuation in ‘41). [See “The Dissolution of Eastern European Jewry”].
3 — How many people were killed in gas chambers? Zero. There is no forensic evidence that any gassings ever took place at any camp. The numbers involved are physically impossible. Eyewitness reports have been shown to be unreliable.


Posted by Gudmund on Sat, 08 Jan 2011 17:30 | #

The Jews have by far contributed more to the world in science, medicine, technology, and all intellectual fields than any other group—an extraordinary feat given the endless discrimination, enslavement, and pogroms to which they have been subjected over centuries.

They have not.  Aryans have achieved the highest in all of those things.  Just to name a few things:  we harnessed electricity, discovered DNA, came up with the very system of scientific inquiry in fact, invented industral technology to increase carrying capacity, etc.  Not only are our accomplishments superior to yours, you Jews have required living in Aryan civilizations under intellectual conditions created by Aryans to accomplish all of your breakthroughs.  You need us, but we do not need you.

Face it, you’re a race of civilization-parasites, and all of your hysterical god-complex rantings do nothing other than confirm the proposition that your kind are the enemies of all mankind.  As for why you have been consistently “persecuted”, it is because you cannot behave yourselves and you know it.


Posted by Jake on Sat, 08 Jan 2011 17:57 | #


It would be incredible if there were still significant traces of the gas used in the camps after all this time.  That assertion is just like your earlier propaganda video, which sinisterly intoned that, because all of the ashes from a camp could not be found conveniently in large quantities within the small confines of the camp itself undisturbed after all these decades, then we know “with 100% certainty” that the Holocaust was a hoax.  Testimony of survivors and camp guards, as well as internal Nazi records, all support the notion that gas chambers were used to exterminate Jews.  Your idea of “honest” demographic study leaves much to be desired, and your attempt to exonerate Hitler of direct involvement in the Nazi killing of “only” one million Jews is bizarre.


You have probably done more research on this subject than I, but I think that the size of a population has to be considered when you’re evaluating its history.  I stand by my statement that Jews and East Asians have higher average IQs than whites.  I disagree with your hyperbolic belief that blacks have contributed absolutely nothing of any value to the world.

It would be pretty hard to argue that England or France did more to start WW1 than Germany or Turkey.

I’m part German myself, although mainly Polish.


Posted by Jake on Sat, 08 Jan 2011 18:00 | #


Hysterical anti-Semites like yourself hardly merit much response, but, for the record:  I’m not Jewish.


Posted by Ivan on Sat, 08 Jan 2011 19:50 | #

Were Jews rounded up and detained and otherwise mistreated? Yes.
Did many Jews (and others) suffer in German concentration camps? Yes.
Did many Jews die during the period 1941-1945? Yes.
Were there deliberate killings of Jews by Europeans, 1941-1945? Yes.

If anyone denies any of the above, they are fools indeed.

Yes, but let’s not forget the jews richly deserved what they got during 1941-1945. That’s the key point.

Were Krym Tatars, Balkars, Russian Germans, Chechens rounded up and detained and otherwise mistreated? Yes.
Did many non-Jews suffer in German concentration camps? Yes.
Did many non-Jews die during the period 1941-1945? Yes.
Were there deliberate killings of Russians by Germans and Germans by Russians, 1941-1945? Yes.

If anyone denies any of the above, they are fools indeed. There was a war in 1941-1945, you know. That’s what happens during the wars. But nobody complains and nobody talks about being holocausted except the parasitic jews.

During the second round of looting and raping of Russia by the jews, which became known in History as Gorbachev’s Perestroika, a jewish journalist asked a well-known Russian-German physicist Raushenbach: How could forgive you the Soviet Government for mistreatment of Russian-Germans during the war? Raushenbach, a reasonable man, answered very simply: There is nothing for me to forgive - Stalin deported all Russian-Germans to Kazakhstan to prevent their possible collaboration with the advancing German troops. Even though I am sure that not all Russian-Germans would cooperate with Hitler in occupied territories, I can understand the prudence of doing so during the war.

Btw, all deported during the war ethnic groups were allowed to return to their homelands after the war.


Posted by johnUK on Sat, 08 Jan 2011 20:26 | #


When the Soviet archive material were open up it completely debunked all of Conquests figures.

And there were famines routinely in the Soviet Union until 32-33 and was not limited to Ukraine affecting other regions of the USSR in the Caucasus, Siberia, Kazakhstan and (Russia oriented) Eastern Ukraine.
So it cannot be called genocide as it did not specifically Ukrainians with the overwhelming majority of people being effected were Russians.

It effected large agricultural centres the worst not just in Ukraine but Eastern Ukraine had the largest agriculture centre due to its quality of soil hence why it suffered the most.

The collectivisation process was created to centralise the agricultural industry and prevent since which worked as there was not another famine outbreak until WW2.

Getty did a good Q and A on the points you mentioned.

http://h-net.msu.edu/cgi-bin/logbrowse.pl?trx=vx&list=H-Russia&month=0205&week=a&msg=G9gRj0I/eXnblGCPQyYXlA&user;=&pw;Origins of the Holomodor hoax.


Povolzhye Famine (Volga famine 1921-22)


Wheatcroft on the famine.

Mark Tauger who has studied it full time and came to the conclusion it was not an engineered famine in fact the collectivisation as well as other Soviet historians who have studied the archives.


Senior official responsible for the famine were Jewish.

“Last July, the Ukrainian Security Service released a list of high-ranking Soviet state and Communist Party officials—as well as officials from NKVD, the police force of Soviet Russia—that essentially blamed Jews and Latvians responsible for perpetrating and executing the famine because most of the names on the list were Jewish.”


I regards to the Holocaust which I don’t take particular view on why do they censor and arrest people who simply want to conduct scientific and academic research whether it is possible and technically feasible kill that many people and cremate there bodies in the time period they had like chemical tests conducted by German-trained chemist Germar Rudolf in the Rudolph Report.

Given the fact that Jewish organisations have exhorted tens of billions in reparations since WW2 which continue to this day and not just Germany on a fixated number of 6 million that was referenced by Jewish individuals dating back to WW1.


Posted by johnUK on Sat, 08 Jan 2011 20:39 | #


List of collaberators and Nazi units inside the Soviet Union.



Posted by Hail on Sat, 08 Jan 2011 21:03 | #

Jake wrote:
It would be incredible if there were still significant traces of the gas used in the camps after all this time.

A small building used to delouse clothing at Auschwitz (the “delousing chamber”) had very high Zyklon in the late 1980s and 1990s. Three separate tests (that I know of) were carried out in that era: by Leuchter, by Rudolf, and then by Polish authorities. All came to the same exact conclusion: No appreciable trace of gas on the alleged “extermination chamber”, but a lot on the inside and outside of the delousing-building. (Which no one has ever disputed was used for delousing).

The walls of the delousing chambers had residual cyanide levels as high as 13,500 parts per million, while the rooms said to be gas chambers had on the average about 2 parts per million…similar to that found in other buildings nearby (used as a base of comparison) that may have been fumigated a few times during the war.

Was Zyklon-B Used for Mass Gassings?

The delousing building was subjected to lots of Zyklon-B to kill lice regularly. Yet the Myth tells us that far more gas was used daily at the “extermination chamber” to kill Jews. There is hardly a trace of the gas residue in the latter.

Chemical evidence does not lie.

Also see:
Zyklon B and German Delousing Facilities


Posted by Hail on Sat, 08 Jan 2011 21:17 | #

internal Nazi records…support the notion that gas chambers were used to exterminate Jews

So you are holding these records in your private collection? Why haven’t you released them??

Because no one else, on Earth, has ever seen any such thing. [Except using the bizarre logic of the Holocaust-Enforcers-cum-strawgrabbers; “genocide by telepathy” as Dr. Faurisson says].

Where were these alleged “documented” exterminations carried out, according to your private collection of documents? Not at Auschwitz: Physically impossible in various technical ways (See Lueftl Report and others) and because no chemical residue of the gas remains in the “gas-chamber” buildings.

Not at Treblinka, not at Madjanek, not at Sobibor. (See “One Third of the Holocaust”)

Not at any camp that fell in West-Germany. (U.S. investigators debunked all the original hysterics about “gassings” at Dachau and so on by the late ‘40s; the Soviet Zone allowed no investigation. By the time the Communist bloc opened-up, the Myth had gone too deep).


Posted by Ivan on Sat, 08 Jan 2011 21:25 | #


Joseph Stalin was the only man in the History of Mankind who succeeded in beating the jews in their own game. Jesus Christ ended up on the cross, Adolf Hitler committed suicide, and only Joseph Stalin beat the shit of the jews. He killed all the top Bolshevik jews and removed the jews completely from the levers of power by the end of the Great Purge of 1936-1938. That’s why jews lie about him and hate him so much - they hate Stalin even more than Hitler.

Vladimir Putin called the demise of the Soviet Union, especially the way it happened, the greatest geopolitical catastrophe of the 20th century. In simplest terms what happened was that the international Jewry completed successfully dismantling of jew-free empire created almost single handedly by Joseph Stalin.

Stalin preserved the Russian statehood as best as it was possible to do so under the circumstances the Russian Empire found itself after the mess of the Bolshevik revolution.

That’s why the Russians regard Stalin today as the second greatest man in the entire history of Russia. Not Ivan The Terrible, not Peter The Great, not Katherine The Great, not Generalissimos Suvorov, not Field Marshal Kutuzov who defeated Napoleon’s Grande Armée, not Feodor Dostoevsky, not Leo Tolstoy, not Vladimir Lenin - but Joseph Stalin. Only Alexander Nevsky - the key figure of medieval Rus, proclaimed “Saint” of the Russian Orthodox Church by Metropolite Macariy in 1547 - came ahead of Stalin in the TV polls conducted just two years ago:
Stalin still a hero in Russia

The poll results you see in this video are preliminary. Pay attention to that ugly Jewish bitch from the Moscow branch of Carnegie Endowment, Masha Lipman, talking about “Stalin The Butcher” in an attempt to put a spin on the poll results. The presenter of the show, Alexander Lyubimov, is most probably Jewish also. He is clearly trying to diminish the importance of TV poll.

Compare the Jewish spin masters’ take on the outcome of the poll with that of that pretty Russian girl on the streets.

As the result of this successful completion of de-Stalinisation process, Russian statehood found itself by the end of the 20th century on the brink of total destruction. Russia somewhat recovered with Putin’s presidency, but it’s fate is still hanging on a thin thread.


Posted by Ivan on Sat, 08 Jan 2011 23:07 | #

Butt heads,

Here is a very simple idea for you if you can wrap up your lemming heads around it: Almost everything you ‘know’ about Hitler and Stalin was induced in your brains one way or the another by the jewish education, jewish books, jewish Wikipedia, jewish propaganda, jewish defamation, and jewish lies.

Here is Joseph Stalin, whom most of you in the West have never known, whom the Russian people loved dearly and still do, whom the jews would like to forget about once and for all as nightmare:


Yes, this is propaganda, but propaganda designed to correct the jewish defamation of the great man. It may sound as blasphemy to you, butt heads - that’s how little you know - but there are attempts floating around in Russia to canonise Joseph Stalin by the Russian Orthodox Church, just like Alexander Nevsky was canonised:


That’s how important the image of Stalin has become to the Russians today when they looked into the abyss of losing their statehood and got horrified.

He’ll be back. Trust me on this.


Posted by Leon Haller on Sun, 09 Jan 2011 01:31 | #

I need to study these issues more than I have.

I am a conventional American conservative of the Hard Right, which used to imply (pre-neocon) looking at the world (and therefore race) honestly, and defending one’s own people first, especially when my people, white Christians, are so obviously ethically and civilizationally superior to nonwhites, in the US and around the world. I am a race-realist (recognize the truth of racial inequality), and racial nationalist (seek to ensure the genetic perpetuity, as well as defend the political power, of the white race).


I don’t know enough to respond to you, but I doubt I shall ever really know the truth. I have several books from Noontide Press on the Holocaust, but I also have the standard mainstream histories, admittedly mostly written by Jews (eg, Yahil, Friedlander, Dawidowicz, but also Browning and others). There are interesting historiographical and even philosophical issues here pertaining to the possibility of attaining genuine historical knowledge. But how do we really know anything? Epistemologists and radical sceptics have been bruiting about these issues for, literally, millenia - and yet, we do know many things, albeit forever contingently (we must be open to new theories if additional evidence warrants them).

I confess I find it hard to believe that all of the voluminous studies of the Holocaust, by very intelligent and not always obviously dishonest persons, constitute simple myth. We racialists are prone to wanting to believe otherwise than the mainstream view of the Holocaust, precisely because the Holocaust narrative has proven so fruitful for the ethnic (as well as white ‘native alien’) enemies of white power and the West - and, to some extent, because we recognize that Jews as a group (whatever the moral merits of individual Jews) are unusually mendacious and frankly sneaky when compared at least to white gentiles. That may sound like gutter anti-Semitism, but is it true? I think so. Not every black is a criminal, but characterizing blacks as a race of criminal savages (compared to whites) is a true generalization, to the extent that human group generalizations are ever true (and nationalists hold, scientifically, that they are, even of such generalizing is often abused). It’s probably not an historical accident that Jews were the main developers of the discipline of “public relations” (aka, “spin”). 

One thing I do know, however, and have stated here and elsewhere, is that the road of Holocaust denial is not at present a fruitful one for white preservationists to go down. Obviously, I support free, open-ended intellectual inquiry (a very white attitude, btw), and, were I to become a political figure or pubic intellectual of note, I would certainly decry the totalitarian laws in Europe and elsewhere in the West obstructing such inquiry. The Jews do themselves no favor with these laws, and I do wonder what exactly they are afraid of. No one would think of jailing a man who wastes his time trying to prove that the Earth is flat.

But those who would prevent the onrushing annihilation of white civilization had better realize how limited are our funds and forces, how much the “correlation of racial power” is against us. Every trend in the world, from biological to economic to ideological, is inexorably pushing whites to eventual extinction. If we would stop these trends, we need to be very shrewd. The anti-Nazi narrative, even acknowledging the tremendous amount of mendacity and exaggeration built into it, is extremely powerful to, and well-lodged in, the Western psyche today. You may not like that fact, but we must be realistic in all things.

For well over two decades, I have been saying in racialist circles that we need to move past the Nazi period, and develop totally Nazi-rein arguments and policies. Even real Nazis should recognize this. I was thus very gratified when Jared Taylor began American Renaissance, which was clearly intended to tell the truth about race and white survival while moving beyond self-limiting old debates on the Far Right. White nationalism could/will become more popular, as the objective situation of whites collectively continues to deteriorate throughout the world (and it only will do so, if only because we are demographically shrinking, while most nonwhite peoples are rapidly expanding, an expansion that will not slow in absolute numbers until near the end of the century). But it will only do so to the extent that either whites as individuals face lethal racial danger (at which point it may be too late to save ourselves), or whites generally come to see it as ethically acceptable (hence my repeated exhortations to locate WN within Christianity, a theoretical project of great interest to me personally, but of great utility to the larger cause). Even challenging ‘Holocaustianity’ makes this task more difficult than it need be.

The way to deal with the Jews is not to deal with them directly, but to build up a positive white racial nationalism. The focus should be on demonstrating:

1. the nexus between multiculturalism and multiracialism (and, for the latter, the relation between it and mass immigration, something not as well understood in the US as it should be - especially by the younger generation, ignorant of history, massively indoctrinated by multiculti propaganda, and seeing ‘diversity’ as the American norm);

2. the threat of multiculturalism to our traditions, and the independent value of those traditions;

3. racial inequality, and the physical as well as financial threats that nonwhites pose to whites now, and how much greater these will be in the future; and

4. the hypocrisy and injustice with which whites are treated by the anti-white establishments in the West.

The important concern is to start the racialist ball rolling, so to speak. To do that, you focus on the easiest issues (illegal immigration, black or immigrant criminality, ‘affirmative’ racism), the most graphic and well-understood, not the very hardest (the Jews and their behavior). Once one element of the Left’s assault has been rolled back (either literally, or at least in terms of the psychological assent of the white majority), we press for more. Outside of revolutions (which are most unlikely in the West for the foreseeable future; ie, for decades during which the nonwhite presence, and, if you will, Jewish elite stranglehold, will continue to grow), this is the only realistic approach to take in democracies.


Posted by Leon Haller on Sun, 09 Jan 2011 01:40 | #

I meant to end by noting that following my approach will lead to a situation in which the Jews gradually find themselves confronted with nonwhite aliens and savages, on one side, and an awakened and increasingly assertive and confident white community, on the other. Perhaps at that point Jews will see which way the wind is blowin’, and even mute their antiwhiteness and wish to ally with us (I suspect that will be the case). But if they do not, it will be immaterial to us anyway, as Jewish power is based on white confusion and lack of collective consciousness. Awaken our people, through a ratcheting set of demands for genuine racial justice, and Jewish power will evaporate, without need for serious confrontations.

Alas, it does take a certain worldliness and wisdom to appreciate my arguments, something sadly lacking among all too many racialists.


Posted by jamesUK on Sun, 09 Jan 2011 03:37 | #


Do most people in Russia know the truth about Stalin?

I was stunned to discover despite having issues and big holes with the main stream historian view of Stalin that what we were told of him was total bogus.

Actually Stalin was killed in a 53 poisoned in a Kruschev Trotskyite lead Communist coup which Stalin discovered and legally prosecuted in trials which were not show trials prior to WW2 who Kruschev laid the foundations of anti-Stalinist propaganda by fixing the archives and launching a massive de-Stalinisation program. 

I wouldn’t categorise all Jews in a negative light after all the best resources I use to find info on the internet are LaRouches organisation with some good info on Russia and the NWO and Michel Chossudovskys Global Research.




Posted by Jake on Sun, 09 Jan 2011 03:54 | #


“The walls and ceilings of the gas chambers were plastered and whitewashed as numerous eyewitnesses have testified. By the time Leuchter arrived at the camp to take his samples, the plaster was gone and the exposed brick had been exposed to 40 years of rain, sun and snow. As HCN leaves only a thin blue chemical residue on surfaces, any “Prussian Blue” residue from the HCN would have collected on the surface of the plaster and would not have left a substantial presence on the bricks and mortar or concrete underneath.

Leuchter collected 31 handful-sized samples of bricks and mortar from the cremas and one control sample from the delousing chamber in Birkenau. By the time he crawled into the ruins of Crema 2, the plaster was long gone and only the bricks and mortar and concrete remained. Cremas 4 and 5 were constructed entirely of brick. They were totally destroyed before the end of the war. Only the concrete foundations remain and bricks have been gathered from around the area and loosely stacked up to show the general outline of the floor plan of the buildings. The bricks that Leuchter sampled did not necessarily come from anywhere near the gas chamber rooms.

In the laboratory the individual samples were ground up into powder. Any trace of the HCN residue that might have been there became a miniscule part of the entire sample. A more appropriate method would have tested only the surfaces of the sample.  Testing the total amount of the ground up powder was like trying to analyze the color and chemical structure of paint on the inside of a wall by looking for it in the boards and masonry behind the drywall. In the case of Cremas 4 and 5, it would like analyzing the materials from another room entirely.”

In reality, it requires a maximum of only 300 ppm of HNC to kill humans, whereas to kill lice, beetles, etc. requires at least 16,600 ppm of HCN. It is understandable, therefore that the walls of the delousing chamber are heavily stained with “Prussian Blue” because of the much higher concentration of HCN that was needed and by the much longer periods of time it took to kill insects.

The gas chambers used much lower concentrations of HCN, were quickly aired out and were not always in continuous use. After each gassing, the walls and floors were washed down with water. Furthermore, Cremas 2, 3, 4 and 5 are in ruins and had been exposed to the elements of sun, rain, ice and snow for 43 years when Leuchter took his samples. The delousing building, on the other hand, is still standing so the walls with the “Prussian Blue” residue are protected from the elements.

A properly authorized and meticulously conducted, rigorously scientific study done by Polish authorities in 1994 found that “in spite of the passage of a considerable period of time (over 45 years) in the walls of the facilities which once were in contact with hydrogen cyanide the vestigial amounts of the combinations of this constituent of Zyklon B had been preserved. This is also true of the ruins of the former gas chambers.”

The fact that even “insignificant traces” were found in the ruins of the gas chambers after all these years of being exposed to the elements is proof that there WERE gas chambers in Auschwitz-Birkenau.

So you are holding these records in your private collection?

A letter from Karl Bischoff, the head architect at Auschwitz, to the German Armament Works dated March 31, 1943 orders “three gas tight doors” for Crema 3 following “exactly the size and construction of those already delivered” for Crema 2. Bischoff reminded the manufacturer that the doors had to have a spy-hole of double 8-mm glass “with a rubber seal and metal fitting.” The order was characterized as “very urgent.”

There are also many photographs of actual gas-tight doors that were found all over Auschwitz immediately after the war. One, which had been used in either Crema 4 or 5, had a peep-hole covered with a heavy mesh screen and still had a gas-tight seal still around the edge, just as Bischoff’s letter requested.

The blueprints for Crema 2 show ventilation ducts in the walls (labeled ‘Entlüftung’) and the remains of the ducts can still be seen in the ruins.

In the archives there is also a request for a “handle for the gastight door” and a request for “twenty-four-gastight anchoring screws for gas tight doors” for Cremas 4 and 5.


Posted by Ivan on Sun, 09 Jan 2011 04:57 | #

Do most people in Russia know the truth about Stalin?

No, jamesUK, unfortunately they don’t. Peoples of the Russian Federation, like any other peoples, are not immune to jewish lies and brainwashing. Still, not surprisingly, their knowledge of Stalin is more accurate compared to that of the Westerners’.

Intellectuals, like Alexander Solzhenitsyn, who is looked upon like some kind of great sage in the Western world, were in the forefront of destroying the great Soviet Empire created at such enormous cost and sacrifice by the Russian and other Soviet peoples.

Yes, you are absolutely right, de-Stalinisation process started almost immediately after Stalin’s death by little, stupid man Khrushchev.

It may sound somewhat paradoxical, but the attitude and opinion held of Stalin by ordinary Russians are closer to the reality than that of Russian intellectuals. You see, ordinary people were not infected with the disease of reading jewish books revealing ‘the truth’ about Stalin - a trend that became very fashionable among Russian intellectuals during Gorbachev’s Perestroika. But what happened to Russia and its peoples during Perestroika served as an invaluable education to the whole nation which prompted an intense interest in the legacy and personality of Stalin.

Now people, including even stupid intellectuals, slowly but surely are coming to a realization of what they had under Stalin and what they lost forever. Russia became an ordinary consumer society, which is absolutely morbid to the Russian spirituality. Russians are one of the few nations on Earth with messianic mentality and spirit. Take that spirit from them - they are no longer Russians.


Posted by Jake on Sun, 09 Jan 2011 06:05 | #

Just as my most post above debunks the “no gas chamber” propaganda of the Hitler-worshippers that post here, Ivan’s admiration for Stalin needs to be confronted.

Conquest was not at all “too high” in his estimates.  In the Great Terror, Conquest stated that at least 20 million, and more probably 30 million, individuals were killed by Josef Stalin’s regime.  According to professor R.J. Rummel, Conquest’s calculations excluded camp deaths after 1950, and before 1936; executions 1939-53; the vast deportation of the people of captive nations into the camps, and their deaths 1939-1953; the massive deportation within the Soviet Union of minorities 1941-1944; and their deaths; and those the Soviet Red Army and secret police executed throughout Eastern Europe after their conquest during 1944-1945. Moreover, the Holodomor that killed 5 million in 1932-1934 (according to Rummel) is not included.  Rummel wrote:

“One source of the difference is that Conquest too conservatively estimates the death toll in the camps as 12,000,000 for the years 1936 to 1950, when for just the post-war period alone, 1946-1953, the toll probably exceeded this (see Appendix 8.1). The mid-total of those killed in the camps during the Stalin years is 32,584,000 (less than 2,000,000 of these foreigners); about 7,000,000 more were killed in other years. It is significant here, therefore, that the overall, mid-total of camp deaths based on these numbers already has been shown not to be excessive (lines 38 to 56). Second, Conquest excludes the 5,000,000 intentionally starved to death in the Ukrainian famine (this intentionality and number Conquest establishes in a much later work), and the perhaps 333,000 famine deaths Stalin was responsible for in the post-war period. Third, excluding those killed in collectivization and the camps, Conquest only allows for a million executions during the period, which he believes is “certainly a low estimate.” Indeed, a million executions is probably a safe estimate for the Great Terror period alone. I get from the Appendices (4.1-8.1) a total of 4,565,000 more killed in Stalin’s terror throughout his 25-year reign. Finally, Conquest ignores the millions that died in deportations after the collectivization period (in a much later work Conquest himself calculates that 530,000 died alone in the deportation of eight nations during the war; this excludes the death toll among Ukrainians, non-Volga German-Soviets, Greek-Soviets, Korean-Soviets, etc.—see Appendix 7.1).”

In total; Rummel estimates that the former Soviet Union was responsible for the deaths of 62 million people, including 7 million foreigners and 55 million citizens. This includes 4 million in the civil war; 2 million under Lenin’s New Economic Policy; and 7 million murdered by Stalin’s successors. (The commonly cited estimate of dead in the civil war is around 14 million, but Rummel is here counting only democidal killings by the Communists during the war).

Rummel arrived at this number by taking every scholarly estimate he could find for deaths BY CAUSE in the Soviet Union and then averaging them out.  He did so multiple times in several peer-reviewed works over decades, and repeated the process for Nazi Germany and Maoist China.  His estimates for Nazi Germany (21 million) and Maoist China (76 million; internal Chinese government studies estimate 80 million) have been confirmed.  He checked this data by comparing it to the democide rates he established for every other Communist country and found that all were roughly identical.

The most recent demographic evidence suggests that Stalin killed well over 10 million, and perhaps as many as 15 million, individuals during the thirties alone, and an even greater sum than this during WW2:  http://www.paulbogdanor.com/left/soviet/rosefielde.pdf


Posted by johnUK on Sun, 09 Jan 2011 06:28 | #


Medvedev is pushing a new anti-Stalinist line making Solzhenitsyn mostly fraudulent work Gulag Archipelago as mandatory reading in Russian schools and pushed the Duma to recognise Soviet guilty for Katyn although there was new revelations the year that the smoking gun documents were forgeries and that since Yeltsin rule that a group was operating to falsify and insert forged material into the archives. 


The Communist system was inevitable that it would collapse as it was not Russian but an artificially entity like the Taliban in Afghanistan forced on the Russian people a hostile minority government who wanted to replace the ethnic Russian population with junk like abortion, open immigration, radical feminism, forced atheism, etc.

Even Stalin in 1901 decried Tsarist policy of Russification.

As Lenin put it:

“I don’t care what becomes of Russia. To hell with it. All this is only the road to a World Revolution.”


Even though Stalin attempted to Russify Communism in Russia it was still in the trappings of Communist ideology. 

Now that Communism has collapsed Russia can now acquire western technologies and companies like China did and create there own industries and forge trade alliances with other countries like Germany and France.

A good economic model for Russia to emulate is there Eastern neighbour China who with Chinese assistance can help develop Siberia.


Posted by johnUK on Sun, 09 Jan 2011 07:01 | #


Conquest work has been debunked by people that have studied the archives and did a detailed analysis of the data including census data.
Most people died pre WW2 due to periodic famine and large outbreaks of disease.

Analysis of archive material and real numbers.

Victims of the Soviet Penal System in the Pre-war Years:A First Approach on the Basis of Archival Evidence
Peter A. Coclanis, J. Arch Getty, James L. Huston, Marc Raeff, Gabor T. Rittersporn, Paul W. Schroeder, Carl Strikwerda and Viktor N. Zemskov


The Melbourne Gateway to Research on Soviet History (MelGROSH) (includes NKVD records and other archive material posted on the site).


The most recent demographic evidence suggests that Stalin killed well over 10 million, and perhaps as many as 15 million, individuals during the thirties alone


How exactly was he able to start massive industrialisation projects when Stalin for no apparent reason facing a serious threat from both its eastern and western flank started to kill of his workforce needed for construction and factories.

Wouldn’t industrial output decline?


Posted by Ivan on Sun, 09 Jan 2011 07:07 | #


May I make a suggestion for you to put at the top of your posts with your ‘debunks’ and ‘proofs’ a warning: The following is not for people with common sense, it’s rather for intellectuals like James Bowery. That would save lots of people lots of time, not to mention, lots of brains from damage, unless your purpose is precisely that - to damage brains - of course.

Here is, Jake, how an ordinary man with absolutely no scientific or historical knowledge, but with just a modicum of common sense and second grade math would figure out with ease that the so-called Holocaust was and is a jewish sham, scam, scheme - whichever word you prefer.

Would you pay $100 at e-Bay for a most urgently needed item, the delivery of which, if ever delivered, would take two weeks, if you could easily buy that same item for $1 at your local One-Dollar store down the street?

Why would Germans, or anybody else for that matter, build expensive, awkward, inefficient gas chambers while waging a war on two fronts, hoard stinking jews in concentration camps, tattoo them, feed them for months, shower them before they shove them into these ovens, while all it takes to get rid of a human parasite is one minute and one bullet in the back of the head. And, by the way, that’s exactly what Germans were doing to the jewish commissars in the occupied territories. Taking into account what jews did to Germany, could you blame them for doing so?

Do you know how many human bodies per day you would have to burn to account for 6 million people? Over 4000 every fucking day for 4 years! That’s about the population of a small town, Jake. Could that be done without leaving heavy footprints all over the place? This Holocaust narrative makes absolutely no sense, no matter how you look at it. That’s why it is absolutely necessary to confuse people with ‘debunks’ and ‘proofs’ before one could sell this Holocaust story to unthinking lemmings.

The truth, as always, is very simple: There was no plans - secret or otherwise - for mass physical extermination of jews in Hitler’s Germany. Gassing and all that is pure baloney - it never happened.


Posted by Hamish on Sun, 09 Jan 2011 13:39 | #

Why would Germans, or anybody else for that matter, build expensive, awkward, inefficient gas chambers while waging a war on two fronts, hoard stinking jews in concentration camps, tattoo them, feed them for months, shower them before they shove them into these ovens, while all it takes to get rid of a human parasite is one minute and one bullet in the back of the head.

Because the concentration camps, whatever else they may have been, were used as work camps.

Even if the purpose of the work camps was to kill all the Jews who ended up in them, it doesn’t change that they got a lot of slave labor out of them (especially compared to how cheaply they fed them) before they killed them.


Posted by Thorn on Sun, 09 Jan 2011 16:14 | #

Just heard on “right wing” FOX News that Gabrielle Giffords is Jewish and the shooter is connected to the “anti-Semitic” organization: American Renaissance. Great news reporting, eh?

As we can imagine, the SPLC, ADL, and all the rest of the “anti-racist” (read: anti-white) groups will exploit this tragic incident to the hilt.


Posted by Hail on Sun, 09 Jan 2011 17:04 | #

RE Thorn:

Occidental-Dissent has a thread up with lots of running commentary and news posting on this shooting.


Posted by Thorn on Sun, 09 Jan 2011 21:38 | #

Occidental-Dissent has a thread up with lots of running commentary and news posting on this shooting.


Thanks for bringing that to our attention. Will check it out.

I see Jared Taylor has now weighed in on the issue and is trying to set the record straight.


Posted by Jake on Mon, 10 Jan 2011 01:19 | #

Hail, I’m not going to let this go.  In my earlier response, I wrote:

“In reality, it requires a maximum of only 300 ppm of HNC to kill humans, whereas to kill lice, beetles, etc. requires at least 16,600 ppm of HCN. It is understandable, therefore that the walls of the delousing chamber are heavily stained with “Prussian Blue” because of the much higher concentration of HCN that was needed and by the much longer periods of time it took to kill insects.

The gas chambers used much lower concentrations of HCN, were quickly aired out and were not always in continuous use. After each gassing, the walls and floors were washed down with water. Furthermore, Cremas 2, 3, 4 and 5 are in ruins and had been exposed to the elements of sun, rain, ice and snow for 43 years when Leuchter took his samples. The delousing building, on the other hand, is still standing so the walls with the “Prussian Blue” residue are protected from the elements.

A properly authorized and meticulously conducted, rigorously scientific study done by Polish authorities in 1994 found that “in spite of the passage of a considerable period of time (over 45 years) in the walls of the facilities which once were in contact with hydrogen cyanide the vestigial amounts of the combinations of this constituent of Zyklon B had been preserved. This is also true of the ruins of the former gas chambers.”

A letter from Karl Bischoff, the head architect at Auschwitz, to the German Armament Works dated March 31, 1943 orders “three gas tight doors” for Crema 3 following “exactly the size and construction of those already delivered” for Crema 2. Bischoff reminded the manufacturer that the doors had to have a spy-hole of double 8-mm glass “with a rubber seal and metal fitting.” The order was characterized as “very urgent.”

There are also many photographs of actual gas-tight doors that were found all over Auschwitz immediately after the war. One, which had been used in either Crema 4 or 5, had a peep-hole covered with a heavy mesh screen and still had a gas-tight seal still around the edge, just as Bischoff’s letter requested.

The blueprints for Crema 2 show ventilation ducts in the walls (labeled ‘Entlüftung’) and the remains of the ducts can still be seen in the ruins.

In the archives there is also a request for a “handle for the gastight door” and a request for “twenty-four-gastight anchoring screws for gas tight doors” for Cremas 4 and 5.


“The walls and ceilings of the gas chambers were plastered and whitewashed as numerous eyewitnesses have testified. By the time Leuchter arrived at the camp to take his samples, the plaster was gone and the exposed brick had been exposed to 40 years of rain, sun and snow. As HCN leaves only a thin blue chemical residue on surfaces, any “Prussian Blue” residue from the HCN would have collected on the surface of the plaster and would not have left a substantial presence on the bricks and mortar or concrete underneath.

Leuchter collected 31 handful-sized samples of bricks and mortar from the cremas and one control sample from the delousing chamber in Birkenau. By the time he crawled into the ruins of Crema 2, the plaster was long gone and only the bricks and mortar and concrete remained. Cremas 4 and 5 were constructed entirely of brick. They were totally destroyed before the end of the war. Only the concrete foundations remain and bricks have been gathered from around the area and loosely stacked up to show the general outline of the floor plan of the buildings. The bricks that Leuchter sampled did not necessarily come from anywhere near the gas chamber rooms.

In the laboratory the individual samples were ground up into powder. Any trace of the HCN residue that might have been there became a miniscule part of the entire sample. A more appropriate method would have tested only the surfaces of the sample.  Testing the total amount of the ground up powder was like trying to analyze the color and chemical structure of paint on the inside of a wall by looking for it in the boards and masonry behind the drywall. In the case of Cremas 4 and 5, it would like analyzing the materials from another room entirely.”

The fact that even “insignificant traces” were found in the ruins of the gas chambers after all these years of being exposed to the elements is proof that there WERE gas chambers in Auschwitz-Birkenau.”

You can’t just ignore the facts.

Do you have any response, or do you admit you were lying?

The fact that mass murderers continue to espouse your ideology ought to give you pause for thought.


Posted by lessli on Mon, 10 Jan 2011 02:51 | #

i wanna now how hittler got soo much power over the jewish peolpe?
why did hitler hate his own peolpe!!!!!!??????????


Posted by Ivan on Mon, 10 Jan 2011 03:03 | #

Who is ‘hittler’, lessli?

Btw, the lesser lessli knows the better lessli sleeps.


Posted by A Leader Speaks on Mon, 10 Jan 2011 09:10 | #



Posted by JAgans on Sun, 06 Feb 2011 01:30 | #

First, of all, it is deeply troubling to me to know that there are people who harbor such hate for any group of people. As a small business owner, I have had many dealings with Jewish People and they have always been very fair with me in every respect.

Second, It is absolutely abhorrent to me that anyone could be so ignorant as to deny what happened to the Jews, the Poles, and all other nationalities at the hands of Hitlers Henchmen. Do you think that the movies of executions and mountains of emaciated bodies are a fake?????

Some of our greatest thinkers have been Jews. Of course, the ability to think is obviously very alien and suspicious to some of the hateful ignoramuses who have posted concerning this issue.

To hate a human being for their Nationality, or their color is truly a testament to the fact that many poor excuses for human beings have not ventured very far from the cave.

Hate consumes the hater


Posted by Guessedworker on Sun, 06 Feb 2011 02:07 | #


If you are a prisoner of the belief that Hitler “hated”, perhaps those Jewish people you have engaged with didn’t treat you quite as fairly as you thought.

It is normal for people to want to be free of received wisdom.  I commend this happy estate to you, and hope you will pursue it with due vigour.  You need to.


Posted by Ivan on Sun, 06 Feb 2011 03:55 | #

It is very simple in a nutshell, Jay Agans
Jewish interests were Germans’ against
In order to protect his own kin
Hitler had to get rid of vermin
Should we repeat this again and again ?


Posted by joshua on Tue, 22 Feb 2011 01:15 | #

my mate hayden triffett said hes gay


Posted by danielj on Tue, 22 Feb 2011 02:46 | #

Some of our greatest thinkers have been Jews.

Even more of our greatest thinkers have been anti-semites.


Posted by Mahmoud on Tue, 05 Apr 2011 17:35 | #

From what I learned from reading a book sometime ago here the author explains why Hitler’s hate for the Jews multi-folded after WW II when he learned that many Jews betrayed him deeply.

While he was at the summit of his power and his win over the British was certain during the WW II, the British were about to sign a treaty with Germany that would take much of their rights away. Palestine was still under the British dependence and there was no Nation known as Israel.

The Jews decided to make a deal with England by betraying Hitler that costed Hitler everything he had.  They asked England how about we do something that you no longer need to sign the treaty, because you would not lose but instead win the war; however we want you to do something for us after you win. The deal they asked for was to give us Palestine and we make it our own nation after the war.

Obviously, the British didn’t mind to do that beacuse they were losing anyhow and Palestine was a small country anyway. So, as soon as this deal was done, Hitler learned that the influential Jews who had strong ties with the U.S. Government, forced the United States into the WW II which led into the destruciton of German forces. Hilter’s dreams all vanished by this betrayal and he continued his hate for the Jews until he died. After the WWII was finished, the Jews went back to the British and then claimed Palestine and invented a new country now known as Israel.


Posted by Dirty Bull on Tue, 05 Apr 2011 17:56 | #

          You’re post would be correct if you said World War 1 instead of WW2, mentioned the Balfour Declaration and David Lloyd George.


Posted by MOB on Wed, 06 Apr 2011 10:44 | #

Anyone who says, “Hitler, again . . .” is ignorant.  Certainly too ignorant to call himself a White Nationalist or whatever variation.  Hitler cannot be avoided - he should not be rejected - he is the only person to have ever waged a national war against Jewish tyranny.  That’s why Jews despise him.  That’s why non-Jews must either support him or be silent on the subject.

I see Troy Southgate is cashing in on Hitler with his new book.  I won’t be buying a copy.

Like a scalded cat, Troy instantly, knee-jerk, within seconds, unsubscribed me from his New Right list when I, ignorant of the crime I was committing, posted the URL of photographs of the Third Reich that David Irving posted on his website.  Color photos that revealed the aesthetics of the clothing, hairstyles, uniforms, demeanor, buildings, environments—all beautiful—and, of course, the huge enthusiasm of thousands upon thousands of Germans.

There wasn’t a drop of arrogance in my parents, who came to America from northern Germany in 1930, or in fellow immigrant relatives, neighbors, or friends, all of whom were equally poor but of high quality. They all supported Hitler - fervently.  None were of a rabid temperament.  All understood the Jewish Problem.


Posted by Cara on Mon, 18 Apr 2011 16:43 | #

cheese  Well he hated the jews because he was selfish and they didnt have blonde hair blue eyes !!!

If you dont like the anwser I am 14 so !!


Posted by Shandi on Mon, 02 May 2011 23:02 | #

this article isn’t really helpful!!!


Posted by Mike on Wed, 11 May 2011 05:30 | #

Benjamin Friedman’s 1961 speech given at the Willard Hotel in Washington D.C. says it all and proves beyond any doubt that Hitler and the Nazis were NOT scapegoating the Jews at all but actually knew EXACTLY what they were talking about!!!! Hitler himself said that his political philosophy was “speak the truth and fear not man.” All so called “psychological theories” as to why Hitler said what he did regarding the Jews and how they stabbed Germany in the back are pure rubbish. Hitler spoke the truth and in return for his honesty his country was burned to the ground. They is also still no reason to believe that Friedman as well was not speaking the truth when he said…
“World War I broke out in the summer of 1914. Nineteen-hundred and fourteen was the year in which World War One broke out. There are few people here my age who remember that. Now that war was waged on one side by Great Britain, France, and Russia; and on the other side by Germany, Austria-Hungary, and Turkey. What happened? Within two years Germany had won that war: not alone won it nominally, but won it actually. The German submarines, which were a surprise to the world, had swept all the convoys from the Atlantic Ocean, and Great Britain stood there without ammunition for her soldiers, stood there with one week’s food supply facing her—and after that, starvation. At that time, the French army had mutinied. They lost 600,000 of the flower of French youth in the defense of Verdun on the Somme. The Russian army was defecting. They were picking up their toys and going home, they didn’t want to play war anymore, they didn’t like the Czar. And the Italian army had collapsed.
Now Germany—not a shot had been fired on the German soil. Not an enemy soldier had crossed the border into Germany. And yet, here was Germany offering England peace terms. They offered England a negotiated peace on what the lawyers call a status quo ante basis. That means: “Let’s call the war off, and let everything be as it was before the war started.” Well, England, in the summer of 1916 was considering that. Seriously ! They had no choice. It was either accepting this negotiated peace that Germany was magnanimously offering them, or going on with the war and being totally defeated.
While that was going on, the Zionists in Germany, who represented the Zionists from Eastern Europe, went to the British War Cabinet and—I am going to be brief because this is a long story, but I have all the documents to prove any statement that I make if anyone here is curious, or doesn’t believe what I’m saying is at all possible—the Zionists in London went to the British war cabinet and they said: “Look here. You can yet win this war. You don’t have to give up. You don’t have to accept the negotiated peace offered to you now by Germany. You can win this war if the United States will come in as your ally.”
The United States was not in the war at that time. We were fresh; we were young; we were rich; we were powerful. They [Zionists] told England: “We will guarantee to bring the United States into the war as your ally, to fight with you on your side, if you will promise us Palestine after you win the war.”
In other words, they made this deal: “We will get the United States into this war as your ally. The price you must pay us is Palestine after you have won the war and defeated Germany, Austria-Hungary, and Turkey.” Now England had as much right to promise Palestine to anybody, as the United States would have to promise Japan to Ireland for any reason whatsoever. It’s absolutely absurd that Great Britain—that never had any connection or any interest or any right in what is known as Palestine—should offer it as coin of the realm to pay the Zionists for bringing the United States into the war. However, they made that promise, in October of 1916. October, nineteen hundred and sixteen. And shortly after that—I don’t know how many here remember it—the United States, which was almost totally pro-German—totally pro-German—because the newspapers here were controlled by Jews, the bankers were Jews, all the media of mass communications in this country were controlled by Jews, and they were pro-German because their people, in the majority of cases came from Germany, and they wanted to see Germany lick the Czar. The Jews didn’t like the Czar, and they didn’t want Russia to win this war. So the German bankers—the German-Jews—Kuhn Loeb and the other big banking firms in the United States refused to finance France or England to the extent of one dollar. They stood aside and they said: &“As long as France and England are tied up with Russia, not one cent! “But they poured money into Germany; they fought with Germany against Russia, trying to lick the Czarist regime. Now those same Jews, when they saw the possibility of getting Palestine, they went to England and they made this deal. At that time, everything changed, like the traffic light that changes from red to green. Where the newspapers had been all pro-German, where they’d been telling the people of the difficulties that Germany was having fighting Great Britain commercially and in other respects, all of a sudden the Germans were no good. They were villains. They were Huns. They were shooting Red Cross nurses. They were cutting off babies’ hands. And they were no good. Well, shortly after that, Mr. Wilson declared war on Germany.
The Zionists in London sent these cables to the United States, to Justice Brandeis: “Go to work on President Wilson. We’re getting from England what we want. Now you go to work, and you go to work on President Wilson and get the United States into the war.” And that did happen. That’s how the United States got into the war. We had no more interest in it; we had no more right to be in it than we have to be on the moon tonight instead of in this room. Now the war—World War One—in which the United States participated, had absolutely no reason to be our war. We went in there—we were railroaded into it—if I can be vulgar, we were suckered into—that war merely so that the Zionists of the world could obtain Palestine. Now, that is something that the people in the United States have never been told. They never knew why we went into World War One. Now, what happened? After we got into the war, the Zionists went to Great Britain and they said: “Well, we performed our part of the agreement. Let’s have something in writing that shows that you are going to keep your bargain and give us Palestine after you win the war.” Because they didn’t know whether the war would last another year or another ten years. So they started to work out a receipt. The receipt took the form of a letter, and it was worded in very cryptic language so that the world at large wouldn’t know what it was all about. And that was called the Balfour Declaration. The Balfour Declaration was merely Great Britain’s promise to pay the Zionists what they had agreed upon as a consideration for getting the United States into the war. So this great Balfour Declaration, that you hear so much about, is just as phony as a three dollar bill. And I don’t think I could make it more emphatic than that. Now, that is where all the trouble started. The United States went in the war. The United States crushed Germany. We went in there, and it’s history. You know what happened. Now, when the war was ended, and the Germans went to Paris, to the Paris Peace Conference in 1919, there were 117 Jews there, as a delegation representing the Jews, headed by Bernard Baruch. I was there: I ought to know. Now what happened? The Jews at that peace conference, when they were cutting up Germany and parceling out Europe to all these nations that claimed a right to a certain part of European territory, the Jews said, How about Palestine for us??  And they produced, for the first time to the knowledge of the Germans, this Balfour Declaration.  So the Germans, for the first time realized Oh that was the game!  That’s why the United States came into the war.?  And the Germans for the first time realized that they were defeated, they suffered this terrific reparation that was slapped onto them, because the Zionists wanted Palestine and they were determined to get it at any cost. Now, that brings us up to another very interesting point. When the Germans realized this, they naturally resented it. Up to that time, the Jews had never been better off in any country in the world than they had been in Germany.
You had Mr. Rathenau there, who was maybe 100 times as important in industry and finance as is Bernard Baruch in this country. You had Mr. Balin, who owned the two big steamship lines, the North German Lloyd’s and the Hamburg-American Lines. You had Mr. Bleichroder, who was the banker for the Hohenzollern family. You had the Warburgs in Hamburg, who were the big merchant bankers—the biggest in the world. The Jews were doing very well in Germany. No question about that. Now, the Germans felt: Well, that was quite a sellout. It was a sellout that I can best compare—suppose the United States was at war today with the Soviet Union. And we were winning. And we told the Soviet Union: “Well, let’s quit. We offer you peace terms. Let’s forget the whole thing.” And all of a sudden Red China came into the war as an ally of the Soviet Union. And throwing them into the war brought about our defeat. A crushing defeat, with reparations the likes of which man’s imagination cannot encompass.
Imagine, then, after that defeat, if we found out that it was the Chinese in this country, our Chinese citizens, who all the time we thought they were loyal citizens working with us, were selling us out to the Soviet Union and that it was through them that Red China was brought into the war against us. How would we feel, in the United States against Chinese? I don’t think that one of them would dare show his face on any street. There wouldn’t be lampposts enough, convenient, to take care of them. Imagine how we would feel. Well, that’s how the Germans felt towards these Jews. “We’ve been so nice to them”; and from 1905 on, when the first Communist revolution in Russia failed, and the Jews had to scramble out of Russia, they all went to Germany. And Germany gave them refuge. And they were treated very nicely. And here they sold Germany down the river for no reason at all other than they wanted Palestine as a so-called “Jewish commonwealth.” Now, Nahum Sokolow—all the great leaders, the big names that you read about in connection with Zionism today—they, in 1919, 1920, ‘21, ‘22, and ‘23, they wrote in all their papers—and the press was filled with their statements—that “the feeling against the Jews in Germany is due to the fact that they realized that this great defeat was brought about by our intercession and bringing the United States into the war against them.”


Posted by Mike on Wed, 11 May 2011 05:32 | #

In fact, Hitler was RIGHT about the Jews and why he thought what he did is only a mystery if you want it to be!


Posted by Mike on Wed, 11 May 2011 05:58 | #

Mahmoud you were pretty much correct in your comments. However, you simply got the war wrong and a few other little facts wrong. It was not during the WWII that the Zionists made their deal with the British and stabbed Germany in the back but during WWI.


Posted by wtfp on Fri, 13 May 2011 14:53 | #

you people are sick and should be ashamed of yourselves. i might be young, and i might not understand some of the things you’re saying, but i can tell when someone is supporting this and i am shocked at the amount of people actually sticking up for this man. he is a horrid person and you are horrid for agreeing with him. get a life and go outside.


Posted by Abhishek jain on Sun, 22 May 2011 10:49 | #

well he was a good man as i have listened

but had a wrong and bad felling against jewish people!!!!!!!!!!!!!!


Posted by dawnstar on Fri, 10 Jun 2011 20:20 | #

i got to admit it doesn’t matter why he hated them we just know he hated them with far more then a passion but apparently some people think different and have different resources then everybody else. so who care he hated them and that’s all we know. the only person to tell you the truth is himself and he is dead so someone is right and someone is wrong.


Posted by Sam Carpenter on Fri, 29 Jul 2011 01:43 | #

The interesting thing here is that as I see it, Jewish conspiracy works on an almost subconscious level, never raising a fist, never raising a voice, but in its totality it achieves an aim and total domination of everything worth anything. In contrast, intelligent Christians “support Israel”, or “believe in human rights” or spew out such nonsense that it is hard to think of Chiristianity as anything short of a faith of fools in the wake of the Semitic juggernaut. Yet, there is no spirituality with Judaism, only pretence. They work thru the media and government to make Christianity the same way.

It is pathetic to see the Jewish professionals, deliberate in their erudite defense mechanism, vs. the white of European descent, most likely grossly inarticulate, undercapitalized, with defensive strategies that cannot work and that creates a social tension in which they themselves are the pascal lamb when the government needs to find a villain.


Posted by thomson on Fri, 29 Jul 2011 10:46 | #

          i think that,its somewhat correct.And he proved how racism can be effectively used to create national integration,gr8 is nt it????????????????


Posted by klin on Sat, 30 Jul 2011 19:40 | #

Germans realised the need of colonialism far later than the others and while speeding up they followed that lunatic leader who made a mess everywhere.Germans are endowed with may qualities and Hitler was also probably the most charismatic mass leader human civilisation has ever seen but its a matter of same and misfortune for the world that the combination did not click.


Posted by Es on Sun, 07 Aug 2011 11:23 | #

“Germans realised the need of colonialism far later than the others and while speeding up they followed that lunatic leader”
Where do you get that from? The Germans had to give up their colonies after WWI as part of the reparations.
Also that comment from another poster, how Germans were indulging in their self-glory when Hitler came to power? What?? Have you heard nothing about the situation the Germans were in at the time?
Having and discussing opinions is one thing but how can you discuss on a base where you get the facts all wrong?
Some good history books on the subject might help.


Posted by Alexandra on Sat, 13 Aug 2011 21:37 | #

Thanks for the information, I now understand the “Leftist” theory.
This has really helped with my research for my coursework.


Posted by believer on Mon, 22 Aug 2011 02:08 | #

hitler hated the jews cause the devil inpired the human souls of many germans and of hitler to do so


Posted by Luke on Thu, 25 Aug 2011 11:21 | #

the reason I think he hates jew was because after ww1 (which he served in) left Germany in a povety while Jewish people, who were all mostly worked at banks, lived in luxury compared to Germans that are left freezing to death on the streets. This incredibly angred Hitler that they were doing so while millions of Germans were dying on the streets. He saw “Judenrein” as Germany’s revenge on the Jews for watching many people suffer. I’m on the Nazi’s side, it just shows how selfish and greedy Jews are and will even leave many to die to stay in good health and have a warm bed and food to eat


Posted by Katie on Tue, 20 Sep 2011 23:05 | #

The reason why I think Hitler hated the Jews was because how he was treated when he was a child. He was lonely and unhappy, but when he moved to Germany from Austria he made some friends that liked him as a friend. Then after World War I he blamed the Jews for the defeat of Germany. He thought that the Jews had betrayed them by being Allies with the enemy. Also, he hated them for their type of Religion. Personally, I think he was Jealous because they are called God’s Children and he’s not.


Posted by Jeriel Ahman Patula on Mon, 26 Sep 2011 07:15 | #

In my own understanding. Hitler himself hated jewish people because he believe that they are the cause of his fallen dream.. He wanted to be a good painter but he was neglected and destroyed.. He saw the lots of jewish are good in painting.. And he felt a heavy burden about it… Another thing was that, he actually though that the Jewish people are the burden of Germany.. They cause the Germany to be pulled down… And the German people though that Hitler is was pushed as a chancellor because of the jewish people…


Posted by Tren on Mon, 03 Oct 2011 15:06 | #

Posted by Luke on August 25, 2011, 10:21 AM | #

the reason I think he hates jew was because after ww1 (which he served in) left Germany in a povety while Jewish people, who were all mostly worked at banks, lived in luxury compared to Germans that are left freezing to death on the streets. This incredibly angred Hitler that they were doing so while millions of Germans were dying on the streets. He saw “Judenrein” as Germany’s revenge on the Jews for watching many people suffer. I’m on the Nazi’s side, it just shows how selfish and greedy Jews are and will even leave many to die to stay in good health and have a warm bed and food to eat

Neo-nazi theories.

Well, sounds funny and that’s the base of every Jew conspiracy that Neo-Nazis want to fight.

There’s no need to argue the same things over and over again.
Simple and easy, people should read the “Treaty of Versailles’ terms
and could understand why actions like the invasion to Poland and France took place.
Why Hitler signed a non aggression treaty with URSS
(some Russian Neo-Nazis use this to say “Hitler loves us” and justify their Nazism
when it was only to prevent to URSS could interferer their invasion to Poland)
and other acts thought by Hitler.

As they say “the end of WWI is the beginning of WWII”.
The Treaty of Versailles left a lot of resentment in Germany
and was forced to have a not so good economy.
It should be a great paradise to make a lot of money…

In the end, Neo Nazis want to repeat the history and that means lose again.
even the people they try to save (save?) don’t like them.


Posted by Politically incorect on Fri, 07 Oct 2011 18:20 | #

Jews…...decadence…..control….abuse of power?  Never!

Haulicost shmaulicost….How often do you hear a jew getting upset about Columbus and the masacer of millions of native Americans?  Hit’s a little too close to home.

look at Palestine….oooops sorry…Israel.  Rocks vs Appache helicopters…. (Well, they started it)

How about Mel Gibson….Who?

Charlie Sheen?

Don’t screw with the chosen ones.

Slautering jews…...un-acceptable yes….understandable???


Posted by Hamma Mirwaisi on Tue, 18 Oct 2011 10:50 | #

Why Jews are Hating Humanity?


Posted by sawyer on Sat, 12 Nov 2011 21:22 | #

Hitler killed jews and all what he believe non supreme persons, Because he read the bible and realized that Jews and even Africans were ancestors of Jesus.  He tried to eradicate the truth. King David married a African woman named Bathsheba and gave birth to a child Solomon who was given by God more wealth and wisdom that any king of any nation that is or ever has been.  God asked him to build his elaborate temple.  Hitler could not deal with the thought of not being the supreme race. But,  Jesus is no respect of persons. I’ll reward in heave is not by genology but by souls bought to Jesus and good works. The bible said that all who accepts him are the sons and daughters of God. We are all the children of God if we accept his salvation. Who soever will let him come.


Posted by theolo on Sun, 13 Nov 2011 17:33 | #

DNA tests have shown that Hitler’s ancestors are African Jews. And he shot himself, he was an hero.


Posted by Rustybuck on Mon, 21 Nov 2011 23:09 | #

Guessedworker…........good stuff.  The only thing needed to add is (and I don’t have space to do it here
) is the total history of these jews.  As a culture of talmud believers, their own history speaks
volumns for their own actions.  Poor jew doesn’t doesn’t get it for me and many.  They have been run out of over 109 countries as a people…..why…..why…...money changers….....economic controls….
government controls, schools, who were the people of Sodom and Gomorrah, ie…..these creatures
have NOT ONE good place in all of global history…..why…why…..read their talmud.  They live by totally
different rule books ie.  and continue to make changes and lies according to their agenda…which is still
alive and well…all these issues we and nations are facing today can be traced to their agenda.
Its all about us Christians being Gentiles and spit to these people and always has been.  They are
thieves of our blood….our lives….our countries, and our governments, our schools, our morals….
even our thoughts….check out the purpose of the ADL and the ACLU…..damage control….
and what about their homeland security…...bully laws…..bad mouth laws….check it out gang
its all around us.


Posted by Rustybuck on Mon, 21 Nov 2011 23:26 | #

To: Hail

I Totally agree…...good stuff one only needs to review why they have been run out of over
109 countries…....seems they are serious as a heart attack bout being stupid.  Perhaps this
next (close at hand) “crash” will finally set the record straight.  I’m hopeful that Gentiles will wake
up…go the distance…..and stop what was started some 3000 years ago.  We have little time
left to organize.


Posted by jasmine lokesh on Sat, 26 Nov 2011 06:55 | #

hitler was really a good man but power made him evil and he wanted to avenge everybody who were responsible according to him for his past sorrows<strong></strong>


Posted by max white on Fri, 02 Dec 2011 15:22 | #




Posted by Simon on Wed, 28 Dec 2011 11:31 | #

And I thought the media and politicians were incapable of answering a simple question! You lot take the biscuit!

I have read (and am by no means an expert) in many places that Hitler wished to eradicate the ‘problem that were the Jews’.

If we could avoid all the pro Jew/British/German rhetoric, what exactly was the “Jew Problem”? It wasn’t just Hitler who disliked them and the inference is that the ‘problem’ had been around for years. I have many Jewish friends who cannot (or will not) answer this question.

Was it the pursuit of wealth? Political power? Surely not religeon? Was it the control of the banks as we see today?

Anti Jewish sentiment pre-existed WW2 by many years. Why?



Posted by Judy on Wed, 04 Jan 2012 23:38 | #

I read that Hitler feared the Zionist/Bolshevik Jews.  There are more than one type of Jew. You can read about them on the Internet. 

They wanted to rule the world and take over Austria which Hitler loved. 

So it was Fascism against Communism.  A clash of power.


Posted by lazar on Sun, 08 Jan 2012 04:18 | #



Posted by JC on Fri, 13 Jan 2012 07:09 | #

The world would be a much better place if Hitler had succeeded.


Posted by Bob Storm on Tue, 31 Jan 2012 03:16 | #

Listen to this music and in wonderment of sadness ask yourself is this what any people should ever feel due to one mans rise?


If it’s not allowed it’s Henryk Gorecki symphony of sorrowful songs.

Sympathisers of Hitler should remember that he brought more death and devastation to the world than any other regime in the history of mankind.

We must trust in goodness not evil. Germania does not and never will exist and neither will a utopian state of Palestine.
So many lives lost for land.
God forgive them - if they want it.


Posted by Darya Akatsuki on Mon, 13 Feb 2012 19:56 | #

It is false to say that Jews are first and foremost Jews and only then are they the loyal citizens of their respective countries. Jews have unreservedly fought and sacrificed in the service of their homelands, often killing their coreligionists in the process. But it is true that Jews believe that what is good for the Jews is good for the country they reside in. By aligning the interests of their adopted habitat with their narrower and selfish agenda, Jews feel justified to promote their own interests to the exclusion of all else and all others.

Moreover, the rebirth of the Jewish State presented the Jews with countless ethical dilemmas which they typically resolved by adhering uncritically to Tel-Aviv’s official line. This often brought them into direct conflict with their governments and non-Jewish compatriots and enhanced their reputation as untrustworthy and treacherous.

Hence the Jewish propensity to infiltrate decision-making centers, such as politics and the media. Their aim is to minimize conflicts of interests by transforming their peculiar concerns and preferences into official, if not always consensual, policy. This viral hijacking of the host country’s agenda is particularly evident in the United States where the interest of Jewry and of the only superpower have become inextricable.

It is a fact - not a rant - that Jews are over-represented in certain, influential, professions (in banking, finance, the media, politics, the film industry, publishing, science, the humanities, etc.). This is partly the result of their emphases on education and social upward mobility. But it is also due to the tendency of well-placed Jews to promote their brethren and provide them with privileged access to opportunities, funding, and jobs.

I agree with this dialog and I WISH Adolf Hitler succeeded, if he had this place would be a much better one.


Posted by Paul on Sat, 25 Feb 2012 03:25 | #

Finally, a site that has educated discussions on this topic. I live in Seattle, Washington in the States.

I’ve had a real change of heart lately in how I feel about Jews. Seeing the economic devastation Goldman and Sachs is creating everywhere has me absolutely livid. They are Jews.  I personally suffered when the housing bubble popped because of their powerful influence.

Matt Tabbi’s article in Rolling stone on April 5th 2010 states “The world’s most powerful investment bank is a great vampire squid wrapped around the face of humanity, relentlessly jamming its blood funnel into anything that smells like money. In fact, the history of the recent financial crisis, which doubles as a history of the rapid decline and fall of the suddenly swindled dry American empire, reads like a Who’s Who of Goldman Sachs graduates.”

With this and other articles I found accidentally doing research for a documentary I doing, I began asking myself a difficult question: “was Hitler right about the Jews?” I really don’t know but I want to. But once I do, there will be no turning back. Among the information I discovered is that just about every idea, technology, invention ever conceived in Nazi Germany has been adopted by the United States. 

I need to read the rest of the comments here to really begin to form an opinion. Once I do there will be no turning back. WW2 was way before my time and this is a great resource for study and to find out what I really believe. Some of you are very great writers.

If you can recommend any other resources I would appreciate it.




Read more: http://www.rollingstone.com/politics/news/the-great-american-bubble-machine-20100405#ixzz1nMI5Amms


Posted by Barry on Sun, 26 Feb 2012 10:57 | #

i dont know much about jewish folk. in fact i see anyone that thinks praying to god will change their lives at all, is a bit loony tunes.


Posted by Bharati Narayan on Fri, 09 Mar 2012 07:40 | #

a very good and thorough explanation of Hitler. And his times .

But whatever Hitler did was completely wrong. Killing humans is selfishness. When God created everyone, he didnt differentiate them in basic of races. he created men not to fight with each other, but to co-operate.

I will like to critizise the western nations, except Germany. i have a strong belief that Nato Nations are the most selfish nations in the world. They say about Asians that they don’t share resources together, but infact atlantic countries wanted to use imperialism as the tool to capture the resources of the world’s local population which is not just wrong but completely unjustified.

Germans rose to the no1. power at the world war2. just think, if hitler had captured the atomic technology, he could have enslaved the whole world, and it would be like the west is doing now.

what the west does now is just an addition to what hitler did and nothing else.

about U.S and Europe(Including Stalin’s USSR) I would say they no single one liked jews. they forced jews to go to Israel, forced the locals to go out of their motherland(which was their home for 2000 years), they made arrangements such that jews would go into a fight with the palestinians and eventually end up..

unfortunately, this is still going:(


Posted by Sudipto Bhakta on Sat, 10 Mar 2012 14:06 | #

I will just share my views on that part which reflects upon the question: Why did the Germans so heartily supported the Nazis?

I am an Indian, and I live in West Bengal. I am called a Bengali. However, there is one third of the population who are called Bangal (from Bangladesh). Trust me, if there was a leader in India who would be calling a spade a spade about these Bangals….these people will be butchered.

Whenever, an entire population becomes anti-Semitic, it would be good for us to really think objectively of the phenomenon, because there must be something behind this mass hysteria. Trust me, if non-Jews (majority) of USA are to be asked, they will emphatically want the Jews to be driven out.

I have seen, this mass hatred towards a race is a complex function of their social behavior, predisposition to social injustice, a morbid love to accumulate money, and a tendency to manipulate. Someday, these things come back to haunt the entire race.

In Germany, you could pin-point a person called Hitler, an institution called Nazis, and a victimized race that had religious affiliation (Jews)....so a good story was there for people to enjoy, get thrilled, and to comment upon. However, same events happened in French revolution, and the Bolshevik revolution, with even more horrific stories to tell. Difference- USA and UK were not involved.

So far as the Jews are concerned, a couple of things flummox me-
1. Why do they have to be so fanatic about arm twisting everybody to merely mention the name of Hitler? What is their fear.
2. Wherever they are in power, why are they following Hitler’s methods? At least Hitler was mad…but what makes these Jews react in this fashion?
3. Why in every place that Jews co-exist with other inhabitants, those inhabitants hate the Jews (irrespective of place, culture or skin color.


Posted by Jim Backus on Wed, 14 Mar 2012 22:28 | #

My father in-law was a Jew.  I good man.  Dedicated to his family, into which I married.  I love my wife for all her wonders and faults.

My father in-law taught me many things, mostly through observation.  He worked hard all his life, usually working more than one job, to provide for his family.  He did not achieve wealth.  Instead, he paid his bills, treated people very well, and was responsible for himself and his family.

He (Dad) did not go to Synagogue.  He did not keep practice Jewish holidays, althought I believe he struggled with understanding the history of Hebrews.  Dad served in the Armed Forces during WWII, although he never discussed his actions, duties, etc.  He was decorated, but these decorations were not known to his friends until after his funeral.

Since his passing, I have tried to understand my father in-law and other Jews!

What I have found is simple.  Some Jews are wonderful people, just like my father in-law.  Some Jews are a pain in the ass, just like some of my family members.

If we take the time to look at things clearly, people, come in all types, regardless of their ancestory. 

God said it best (please forgive if I got the quotation wrong) Judge not, least you shall be judged!.  I still have tremendous problems with this one.  I tend to judge and later regret my lack of judgement.


Posted by ASIF on Fri, 23 Mar 2012 12:33 | #

HN.HITTLER was right against jews.these will because of coming 3rd world war and was these were cause of both 1 & 2 world war


Posted by Big Dog on Wed, 28 Mar 2012 17:03 | #

Barry, you have a LOT of nerve to run your mouth about someone’s religion and if you was here right now, I would beat your ass.


Posted by Fishmonger on Sun, 01 Apr 2012 21:00 | #

Here’s the problem with this:  - not all bankers are Jews, and not all Jews are bankers.  These criticisms are valid, but the confusion is in blaming Jews and not the capitalist system.  (I am a capitalist, btw, but see it’s inherent problems).  It’s all too easy to “personify” the problems by assigning them to a people.

But, one may say, a larger percentage of the infamous “1%” (as in “Occupy NY”) is Jewish - at least as far as one can guess by looking at the names on the list of the most wealthy people in the world.  Why would this be?

Well, historically, Christians were not permitted to charge interest via Catholic Church degree.  Jews were exempt from these laws, which kinda forced their hand into banking and like industries.

Think, folks, before you jump on a bandwagon that has resulted in a lot of injustice.  Whether it was 2 million or 6 million, we’re less than a century away from the largest mass murder in history.  The underlying passions that lead to anti-antisemitism start with ignorance.


Posted by Alla on Mon, 09 Apr 2012 18:58 | #

To all who deny Holocost calling it a myth:

American president Dwight D Eisenhower knew that people like you who deny that Holocost ever happened stated and i quote his famous statement “Get it all on record now – get the films – get the witnesses – because somewhere down the track of history some bastard will get up and say that this never happened.”
He was a great war hero and a wonderful president.  He personaly saw concentration camps and dead bodies, gas chambers. 
By the way i work in a pharmaceutical company Sanofi (former Hoechst)  The german Hoechst AG produced cyclon B-gas for concentration camps.  You can full illiterate and ignorant people but not me.
What happened to millions of jews should not be forgotten or ignored.  The museum Yad Vashem in Israel and other jewish museums have plenty of documentaries, pictures, statements from victims and other materials which is enough for anybody to beleive that jews were really gassed, murdered, burned and burried alive(example: Babiy Yar in Ukraine where thousands of jewish women, children and elderlies-entire jewish population of Kiev was burried alive)  My father’s entire family was murdered and nobody knows how.  So don’t lie that holocost did not happen, it happened and there are gas chambers still standing in Dahau, still warm…
In regards to Lazar Kaganovich starving ukrainians is a total lie. If you want to blame someone, blame Joseph Stalin.  His goal wasn’t starving ukrainians, he wanted to get grain from peasants who were hiding it, refusing to give it to soviet government, planning to starve the entire country.  Stalin was in charge, not Kaganovich.  What about Molotov, Malenkov, Beriya?  How come you blame Kaganovich but not them and Stalin?  The entire soviet union was starving in 30s not just ukrainians, my jewish family was starving too.  Russians were starving and muslims. 
The truth should be told….


Posted by Emilie on Tue, 24 Apr 2012 00:03 | #

This is great information… where did you get it from?


Posted by Pip Power on Fri, 27 Apr 2012 15:07 | #

“Abtreibungen macht frei”!


Abortion: The Kosher Slaughter
By Jayne Gardener

Who drives the abortion industry in the United States? Want to hazard a guess?

If you said that the main movers and shakers behind the pro-abortion movement in the U.S. are Jews, you win the grand prize.
While there are, of course, pro-life Jews who are disturbed by the abortion rates in both the United States and Israel, I would venture to say that they are certainly in the minority, especially in the U.S. Their low regard for Gentile life at any stage of development is reflected in the number of abortions performed by Jewish doctors (about half of all abortion providers are Jewish) [1] in Jewish owned “women’s clinics” (about a half of all such clinics are owned by Jews)[2] which is way out of proportion when you consider what a small percentage of our population Jews comprise.

Various people have commented publicly about the disproportionate number of Jews in the abortion rights movement. For instance, Kenneth Mitzner, founder of an organization entitled The Pro-life League Against Neo-Hitlerism said:

“It is tragic but demonstrably true that most of the leaders of the pro-abortion movement are of Jewish extraction.” [3]

First, let’s take a look at the Talmudic view on abortion. The Mishnah, comprising the first part of the Talmud, provides a source for understanding the Jewish position which assumes that life arises only at birth which is when they believe that ensoulment takes place. So long as the fetus, or the most important part of it, its head, has not come out into the world, it is not called nefresh (a human soul) and therefore an unborn fetus is not to be considered a living being until birth.
The old testament, in Exodus 21:22-23 shows us that the Jews did not regard unborn lives as human beings as reflected in the laws during that period:

“If men strive, and hurt a woman with child, so that her fruit depart from her, and yet no mischief follow: he shall be surely punished, according as the woman’s husband will lay upon him; and he shall pay as the judges determine. And if any mischief follow, then thou shalt give life for life, Eye for eye, tooth for tooth, hand for hand, foot for foot, Burning for burning, wound for wound, stripe for stripe.”

“Literally and by interpretation, this passage poses the basic legal principal that the destruction of the fetus is not to be considered punishable murder. Death of the unborn child is punishable by fine only, and capital punishment does not apply. Only if the mother is harmed, i.e. killed, does the law of capital punishment take effect.” [4]

Clearly, the Jewish Talmudic view on abortion is a disturbing one since if a fetus is not considered a living being until birth it can only mean that Talmudic Jews would have no problem with abortion at any stage of gestation for any reason, up until birth. It is unarguable that a fetus is a living being and it is abhorrent to think that pro-abortion Jews would be fine with the destruction of a healthy, viable fetus no matter how late in pregnancy the abortion would take place.
Abortion has pretty wide support among Jews in this country and various Jewish organizations in the U.S. are openly and unashamedly pro abortion, organizations such as:

American Jewish Committee
American Jewish Congress
B’nai B’rith Women
Central Conference of American Rabbis [Reform]
Federation of Reconstructionist Congregations
Hadassah Women
Jewish Labor Committee
Na’amat USA
National Federation of Temple Sisterhoods [Reform]
National Council of Jewish Women
New Jewish Agenda
North American Temple Youth
Rabbinical Assembly Union of American Hebrew Congregations [Reform]
United Synagogues of America [Conservative]
Women’s League for Conservative Judaism [5]

Many Jewish doctors as well as non-professional men and women are vastly overrepresented among American proponents of abortion on demand. Here is but a partial list:

“All four original organizers of the most influential group of abortion pushers in the United States — the National Abortion Rights Action League (NARAL) — were of Jewish birth, including now pro-life Dr. Bernard Nathanson.

Dr. Christopher Tietze worked for the Population Institute and International Planned Parenthood Federation, and did more to promote the worldwide slaughter of innocent unborn children than any other person.

Dr. Alan Guttmacher was president of the Planned Parenthood Federation of America for more than a decade, founded Planned Parenthood Physicians, and did more than any other doctor to promote abortion in this country. He also advocated mandatory abortion and sterilization for certain groups in the United States.

Dr. Etienne-Emile Baulieu, inventor of the RU-486 abortion pill, was born in 1926 to a physician named Leon Blum. He changed his name in 1942.

Stanford professor Paul Ehrlich is the ‘father’ of the overpopulation myth. His ‘work,’ The Population Bomb, was the ‘spark’ that ignited the anti-natalist movement.

Lawrence Lader, (New York University professor and co-founder of NARAL) king of the abortion propagandists, has written several books crammed with fabrications and outright lies that have helped advance abortion all around the world… Lader was quoted 11 times in Roe v. Wade, because he had a message that the Justices wanted to hear. (In the same decision, testimony from the world’s leading fetologist, Dr. A. W. Liley, was totally ignored because it decisively undercut the Court’s decision)… Lader also founded Abortion Rights Mobilization (ARM), which sued the Internal Revenue Service in court in a failed attempt to get the tax-exempt status of the Catholic Church revoked for opposing abortion too effectively. He also was one of the leading proponents of the abortion pill RU-486.” [6]

The above mentioned Dr. Christopher Tietze, who died some years ago has left a legacy, albeit a somewhat distressing one. There is a Dr. Tietze Humanitarian Award from the National Abortion Federation which is awarded to doctors in the abortion industry for their contributions to, and advancement of, quality care in the abortion field.
Of course it isn’t only Jewish members of the medical profession leading the way. They have certainly been aided and abetted in their morbid cause by various legislators, especially state senators Anthony Bielenson in California and Albert Blumenthal in New York who were the leading proponents of legalized abortion in their respective states and in this country.

It is certainly a fact that there are other left wing organizations who are ardent supporters of abortion on demand which have large Jewish involvement, namely The American Civil Liberties Union (ACLU), which has opposed most proposed bills to restrict access to abortion and Norman Lear’s organization, The People For The American Way, which stands firmly on the pro-abortion side.
Not surprisingly, even the Anti-Defamation League sits squarely and firmly on the pro-abortion side of the issue. On April 19th of 2007, the ADL publicly voiced its disappointment that the Supreme Court of the United States ruled to uphold the federal Partial Birth Abortion Act by saying:

“We are deeply troubled by the ramifications of the Supreme Court’s ruling on abortion. By upholding, for the first time, an abortion statute which contains no exception for the health of the woman, the Supreme Court has undermined a woman’s right to choose and to act in accordance with her conscience and the dictates of her faith. We continue to believe that Americans should have the freedom to make difficult decisions of conscience and health without government interference.” [7]

Abortion rights have pretty much become the litmus test for being an elected Democratic representative in this country as evidenced by the pro-abortion stance of Catholics like Sen. Ted Kennedy and others. “Of the 41 Jewish-born members of the U.S. Senate over the last 20 years, 32 (or 80 percent) have been stridently pro-abortion.” [8]
The radical feminist movement, headed by Jewish women like Gloria Steinem and Betty Friedan, has been a staunch driving force behind the pro-abortion movement since its inception. Their disdain for families and imagined female oppression by men in this country and their belief that gender roles are a social construct and not innate has caused them to push for abortion as being the great equalizer, liberating women from their ‘oppressive’ role as mothers.
Simone Weil, former French health minister and Auschwitz survivor who led the drive to legalize abortion in France was quoted as saying:

“We are out to destroy the family. The best way to do that is by attacking it’s weakest member, the unborn child.” [9]

Kate Michaelman is another example. For many years, Michelman, president of Naral Prochoice America from 1985 to 2004, has been at the forefront of one of this country’s most contentious and divisive debates. Ever since Roe Vs Wade, NARAL Pro-Choice America, boasting in excess of one million members and supporters, has been the nation’s leading advocate for a “woman’s right to choose.”
NARAL actively supports the election of pro-abortion candidates through various political action committees. They are heavily invested in lobbying Congress to fight any anti-abortion legislation as well as supporting bills which would protect abortion rights and expand women’s access to “reproductive health care.”
The Lichter-Rothman (both Jewish by the way) study was officially suppressed and one can well imagine why. It’s information regarding members of the media and their proabortion stance was staggering, but not surprising. It’s findings?

“Leaders of the motion picture industry: 95% pro-abortion, 62% Jewish:
Leaders of the television industry: 97% pro-abortion, 59% Jewish:
Leaders of the news media industry: 90% pro-abortion, 23% Jewish.” [10]

Jewish groups are constantly involved in fund-raising efforts to keep abortion rights in the forefront, spending tens of millions of dollars to ensure that abortion remains legal. On February 28th, 1989, The American Jewish Congress ran a full page ad in the New York Times entitled Abortion And The Sacredness Of Life which cost them a staggering $30,000.

Securing the right to kill unborn children comes with a high price tag.
The press often gives pro-abortion Jews considerable coverage as well as considerable leeway. When Dr. Barnett Slepian (an abortion provider who was later shot to death by an anti-abortion activist) slugged a pro-life demonstrator over the head with a baseball bat (causing serious injury) for daring to picket his home, they not only demonstrated a double standard by excusing his behavior, they also claimed that he was targeted for picketing because he was Jewish and therefore the actions by pro-life proponents were anti-semitic.
Marilynn Buckham, an abortion clinic owner told the Buffalo News that the picketing of Slepian’s home was nothing short of religious persecution and attacked Christians for not respecting other people’s relgious beliefs. As a result of Slepian’s assault trial, the picketing of abortion provider’s homes in New York state was declared unlawful and subject to a $500.00 fine and 6 months imprisonment.
In Canada, the leading proponent of abortion is Dr. Henry Morgentaler, another concentration camp survivor who became one of Canada’s most proficient, prolific and notorious abortion providers who flaunted Canadian law and established illegal clinics in Canada where he performed abortions in direct opposition to Canadian law and for which security was provided by Canadian police. Morgentaler was once quoted as saying:

“It took me years to get rid of this image [of myself helpless in the concentration camps]. And to do that, it was absolutely necessary to oppose authority — whatever the authority may be.” [11]

It is a sad reality that Morgentaler has become somewhat of an icon in Canada, a man who is revered as being a champion for the rights of women. In 2005, Henry Morgentaler, at that time 82 years old, was given an honorary doctorate in law by the University of Western Ontario. Morgentaler spoke before the audience, saying he shared in the celebration of those receiving their degrees and told them that he believed that his work to make abortions safe and legal has “benefited society”, urging the graduates to stand up for their rights. Polls show that the vast majority of Canadians are pro-abortion and certainly many Canadians hold that view largely due to Henry Morgentaler’s influence.

And there you have it. Although it is absolutely factual that there is considerable gentile involvement in the abortion industry in this country there is certainly a disproportionate representation of Jews as proponents of abortion rights as well as Jews accounting for about half of all abortion providers and clinic owners; a staggering fact considering that Jews in this country comprise only about 2% of the population.

And why is this the case? Because they hate Gentiles and promote our destruction by any means at their disposal. Obviously there are Jews who oppose abortion but there are certainly many who not only condone it but push for it. And they not only push for it in the early stages of pregnancy but a lot of them have no qualms about abortions performed at any stage of pregnancy for reasons not encompassed by maternal risk or gross fetal abnormality. They are fine with it at any time for any reason.



Posted by Pip Power on Fri, 27 Apr 2012 15:11 | #

“Dr. Mengele’s Still Drumming”

See that baby in the corner?
Her life might not be so good!
I can tell she’ll be a problem…
That much, ma’am, is understood!
She’s not really quite a “person”;
Yes, we’re sure she’s unaware.
Her life may not be worth living…
Let’s “abort” and show we care.
She’s just not what we’d call “human”...
She’s not really at that stage.
“Cute” enough, but just not “with it”...
Unaware and disengaged.
She has no real moral standing…
Not just yet, and that’s the glitch!
She’s no diff’rent from a tomcat,
Or some tiny mongrel !@#$%.
We’ll decide for you what’s “human”...
When a “what” becomes a “who”!
On these shifting sands of reason,
Moral Law we may undo.
These things change, ma’am. Please don’t worry!
We know best about these things;
We’ve been schooled in Bio-Ethics,
Singing songs that Singer sings!
That’s the song of Peter Singer…
(Margaret Sanger sang it, too).
If that melody’s familiar,
Maybe you should ask the Jew.
That’s the downbeat of Eugenics,
Euthanasia’s Rhythm Band.
Dr. Mengele’s still drumming
Out there on that shifting sand.

“The Spirit clearly says that in later times some will abandon the faith and follow deceiving spirits and things taught by demons. Such teaching comes through hypocritical liars whose consciences have been seared as with a hot iron.” -The Apostle Paul (1Timothy 4: 1-2)

• * * * * * *

“[N]ew-born humans are neither persons nor quasi-persons, and their destruction is in no way intrinsically wrong.” - Dr. Michael Tooley, Professor of Ethics , University of Colorado, President of the American Philosophical Society (2011-2012)

“Human babies are not born self-aware or capable of grasping their lives over time. They are not persons. Hence their lives would seem to be no more worthy of protection than the life of a fetus. “ -Dr. Peter Singer PhD, Professor of Bioethics, Princeton University

“After ruling our thoughts and our decisions about life and death for nearly two thousand years, the traditional Western ethic has collapsed.” -Dr. Peter Singer, PhD., Professor of Bioethics, Princeton University

Professor Andrea Zabel

.(JavaScript must be enabled to view this email address)

“People think monsters commit these crimes, so they must look like monsters,” Clingman said. “They don’t. They look like the guy next door.

“A lot of these mothers shack up with anybody and don’t give any thought to what they’re exposing their child to. Murders by strangers are very unusual. Most crimes against kids are by people who have easy access to them.”

Belazi said the cases “are very stressful and you feel the weight of them on your shoulders. My feeling is that people who harm children should never be given an opportunity to do that again. It’s an inexcusable crime.” Midland College Psychology Professor Andrea Zabel said the phenomenon may have animalistic origins.

“There are more step-dads and boyfriends who kill children,” she said.

“When biological fathers do it, they usually take everybody out. Some people look at it from an evolutionary perspective. When a female bear has a cub and is nursing it, she won’t copulate. If a male bear kills the cub, she will go into heat again and copulate with him.”

Dr. Zabel said women and children are victimized because they’re vulnerable. Sometimes it’s a matter of rage and previous abuse and that person can’t take it out on someone their own size,” she said.

Dear Andrea,

Can you please help me understand this terrible holocaust?



What is the total number of legal abortions since 1973?
Since the legalization of abortion in 1973, there have been approximately 50 million abortions performed in the United States.
Source: Guttmacher Institute, 2011, August. Facts on Induced Abortion in the United States.
How many abortions are performed in the United States each year?
According to the Guttmacher Institute, there were 1.21 million abortions performed in the United States in 2008, the most recent year for which data is available. This amounts to 3,322 abortions per day.
Source: Jones, Rachel K. and Kathryn Kooistra. “Abortion Incidence and Access to Services in the United States, 2008.” Perspectives on Sexual and Reproductive Health 43, no. 1 (2011, March): 41-50

What are the methods of abortion and at what stages of pregnancy are they used?
The following abortion methods are used regularly in the United States. Saline abortions are no longer performed.
• Suction Aspiration—6-12 weeks
• D & C (Dilation and Curettage)—6-12 weeks
• D & E (Dilation and Evacuation)—12-24 weeks
• D & X (Dilation and Extraction or Partial Birth Abortion)—24-36 weeks
• Prostaglandin or Live Birth Abortion—second or third trimester
• RU-486 (Early chemical abortion)—up to 56 days gestation
How is a Suction Aspiration abortion performed?
Suction aspiration, the most common abortion method, is typically performed when the fetus is 6-12 weeks, but can be used up to 16 weeks. The cervix is dilated, and a hollow plastic tube with a sharp tip is inserted into the cervix and then into the uterus. An aspirator attached to the tube tears the body of the fetus apart and suctions the pieces through the tube.
How is a D & C abortion performed?
A suction/D & C abortion is performed when the fetus is 6-12 weeks. The cervix is opened using an osmotic dilator. Then a curette (a thin metal rod with a knife-sharp loop at the end) is inserted into the uterus. The curette is used to dismember the fetus.
After this, a cannula (a hollow plastic tube) attached to a suction aspirator is inserted to remove the fetus, placenta and uterine lining. These are captured by a stockinet attached to the end of the suction tube.
To avoid the risk of infection or hemorrhaging, the contents of the stockinet are examined to be sure all fetal parts have been removed.
How is dilation and evacuation abortion (D & E) performed?
A D & E abortion is performed in the second trimester (12-24 weeks) and is usually a 2-3 day procedure. At this stage of pregnancy, the fetus’ tendons, muscles, and bones are more developed. The cervix has closed more tightly and must be dilated enough to remove the larger fetus.
To aid in cervical dilation, laminaria (dried seaweed sticks) are inserted into the cervix. The dilation process can take 1-2 days depending on the size of the fetus.
Once the cervix is sufficiently dilated, the laminaria are removed. Forceps are inserted into the uterus to forcibly dismember the fetus. The skull is then crushed and removed. A suction aspiration is then introduced to remove any remaining fetal parts, the placenta and uterine lining.
How is a partial birth abortion (D & X) performed?
The D & X abortion is used in late second and third trimesters (24-36 weeks). As with the D & E, the cervix must be dilated using laminaria.
Forceps are then introduced into the uterus to grasp the baby’s legs. The baby is delivered breech while the head remains inside the birth canal. Using blunt-tipped surgical scissors, the base of the skull is pierced and a suction catheter is inserted to extract the brain. This causes the skull to collapse and the dead baby is then fully delivered.
Sometimes, while the child is partially delivered and still alive, the organs are removed and sold for fetal tissue experimentation (an illegal practice).
How is a live birth abortion (prostaglandin) performed?
A Prostaglandin or Live Birth Abortion is done in the second or third trimester. Prostaglandins are naturally occurring chemical compounds which assist in the birthing process. For the abortion procedure, artificial prostaglandins are injected into the amniotic sac which induces violent labor and leads to the birth of a child usually too young to survive.
Often salt or another toxin is first injected to ensure that the baby will be delivered dead, since some babies have survived the trauma of a prostaglandin abortion and been born alive.
How is a chemical abortion (RU-486) performed?
RU-486 is a chemical (rather than a surgical) abortion, performed up to 49 days gestation. RU-486 requires at least three visits to the doctor’s office or clinic.
At the first visit, the woman is given a physical exam and is administered mifepristone. RU-486 blocks the action of progesterone, the natural hormone vital to maintaining the lining of the uterus. The embryo starves as the nutrient lining disintegrates.
At a second visit, 36-48 hours later, the woman is giving a dose of artificial prostaglandins, usually misoprostol, which initiate uterine contractions and usually cause the embryo to be expelled from the uterus. Most women abort during the four hour waiting period, but about 30% abort as many as five days later—at home, work, etc.
A third visit about 2 weeks later determines whether the abortion has occurred or if a surgical abortion is necessary to complete the procedure.
Dr. Martin Haskell giving a presentation at the 16th Annual Meeting of the National Abortion Federation Conference in 1992 in San Diego. It was a gathering of abortionists—men and women who make their living by killing babies. Haskell was describing to his audience how to do a partial-birth abortion. Listen to his words about how this procedure takes place:
“The surgeon then introduces large grasping forceps … through the vaginal and cervical canal …  He moves the tip of the instrument carefully towards the fetal lower extremities—and pulls the extremity into the vagina …The surgeon then uses his fingers to deliver the opposite lower extremity, then the torso, the shoulders, and the upper extremities. The skull lodges in the internal os.  The fetus is oriented … spine up … The surgeon then takes a pair of blunt curved Metzenbaum scissors in the right hand.  … the surgeon then forces the scissors into the base of the skull—spreads the scissors to enlarge the opening. The surgeon—surgeon then introduces a suction catheter into this hole and evacuates the skull contents.”
Haskell, having described these brutal details, shows his audience a video of himself doing one of these procedures. And at the end of the video, after the sound of the suction machine taking the brains out of the baby’s head, the audience applauds.
Fetal tissue wholesalers are companies which place employees in abortion clinics to harvest tissue, limbs, organs, etc. from aborted babies. This material is then shipped to researchers working for universities, pharmaceutical companies and government agencies. Although it is against federal law to sell human tissue or body parts, these organizations have devised a system to circumvent this restriction. Technically, all fetal material they harvest is “donated” to them by the clinics. However, they do pay a “site fee” to the clinics for the right to access the tissue. The tissue is then “donated” to the researchers who in turn pay the wholesalers for the cost of retrieval. Profit is realized by the wholesalers’ ability to set their own retrieval fees.


Posted by Leonardo de la Paor on Fri, 27 Apr 2012 15:17 | #

The Holocaust As A Mechanism For Suppressing The Truth
By Louis Beam

Because of the incessant talk about a holocaust, that for the most part did not occur, the truth about a holocaust that did occur has been successfully suppressed since the end of World War II. Now suddenly, with the assumption of a new, democratically elected government in Austria, the horrible truth of the aftermath of World War II has finally broken into the front pages of newspapers throughout the world, with the call by the Austrian Freedom Party for compensation to those ethnic Germans who were expelled and murdered by Czechoslovakia at the end of WW II. For the very first time since 1945, a period encompassing the entire lives of most of those reading these words, the murder, expulsion, enslavement, and destruction of millions of ethnic Germans after the war ended is coming to light with a vengeance.1

This bloodthirsty and ruthless extermination of ethnic Germans is surpassed in magnitude and horror only by crimes of mass murder in the Soviet Union committed by Joseph Stalin against the people of the USSR. It was there, in the horrible gulags of Stalin and in the towns and villages of the Kulaks, that the single, largest mass murders of the twentieth century occurred. Not in Nazi Germany under Hitler, as so many of us have been falsely led to believe, but rather, under communism in the Soviet Union did blood flow so freely that it came to count for naught. Under the rulership of idealistic socialists, some 30 million human beings were put to death by Communist, homicidal butchers. Lest one think only communists and socialists are capable of such horrendous crimes against other human beings, let it be stated here, now, and forever, that the next greatest massacre of helpless humans occurred during that same period by the so called “democracies” of the United States, England, and France.

Indeed, it is now, and only now, that we find out that this second largest mass extermination of human beings in the 20th century did occur in what was formally the greater German Reich. But, the victims were not Jewish concentration camp inmates, and there were not six million murdered during a war, but rather the victims were 9.3 million German civilians and prisoners of war murdered by the Allies after Hitler was dead and after “peace” was declared.2 Such absolute shame and utter disgrace as this heaps upon the heads of the governments of the United States, England, and France-and were it still in existence-the Soviet Union, can scarcely be comprehended. This real holocaust cannot be denied. For, unlike the holocaust we all grew up hearing about, the numbers are not inflated. There were no soap bars made, nor lamp shades produced, only murder, more murder, and then the cover up of the twentieth century ensued.

Suppressing the knowledge of this post war genocide of over nine million defenseless, helpless, and prostate people for so long was no easy task. Those in government and the news media who did so knew that only by creating a lie so horrible that it would shake the very souls of decent men everywhere could the real terror story of mass murder and genocide by the Allies after the war be cleverly covered up. Thus, in the hearts of evil men, with blood dripping from their hands, were born the stories of Jews being made into soap and lamp shades, gas chambers disguised as showers for millions,3 and the black smoke of furnaces reaching toward the heavens from crematoria. In sum, a holocaust of lies was born…the one we all “know” about, but not one that actually occurred.

It needs to be pointed out that it is true that innocent Jews died by the thousands at the hands of Nazis, just as other innocent people died by the thousands at the hands of the Allies at Dresden, Hiroshima, and elsewhere  DURING THE WAR. However, the massive lies with intent to cover up crimes against humanity committed by the Allies begins with the fabrication of the magnitude of Jewish deaths as well as the method of death. The number of Jews killed during the war were inflated not by thousands, but by millions. The fiendish descriptions of German soap factories, lamp shades, and “death camps” during the war were for the purpose of covering up the real holocaust going on after the war ended, creating such enmity and hatred toward the German people that their murder by the millions would go unnoticed, unreported, and unlamented by the world.4 And thus it has been till this day. The lampshades, the soap, the gas chambers were all to cover up the real holocaust: After the unconditional surrender of Germany, 9.3 million people were killed by the victors…deliberately.5 Dwight D. Eisenhower ran prisoner of war camps where well over one million German men who had laid down their arms were starved to death.6Then to crown this horrific crime by the allies, another 15 million Germans were expelled from their homes in East Prussia, Pomerania, Sudetenland, Silesia, and elsewhere. The most massive ethnic cleansing of the century led by the United States.

The deaths of millions in the years after the German surrender can no longer be covered up, nor hidden by distractions. This must be called by what it is: The Real Holocaust.

With the election of the Freedom Party in Austria the truth will become a topic for discussion for the first time in fifty-five years. And this is what terrifies the Western governments of the world. This is the reason for the frenetic opposition to the new government of Austria. The morality, the veracity, the very legitimacy of all those who helped promote the post war lies are now being brought into question. The assumption of power in Austria of those not committed to lies, cover-up, corruption, and historical falsehoods will shake the very foundations of post World War II history, as well as the view of the modern, democratic states toward themselves. The time for truth has finally arrived and let no honest man fear its words.

Let those harboring hatred or ignorance not rejoice or dismiss the deaths of any helpless and innocent people. For all of history shows that human cruelty toward one’s fellow man is a sharp, two edge sword that will cut both ways. Today it may be one’s enemies who are unmercifully persecuted or murdered, but tomorrow it may be your own loved ones. The genocide of human beings is the product of sick minds.7 Healthy men must meet this act head on with absolute repulsion and join together in exposing those guilty of such crimes. It must be remembered that only by insuring the safety of all men do we insure our own. Finally, those of us living in the United States, England, and France must come to terms with and recognize that those in government and media whose ghoulish acts of fabrication and malicious lying hid the truth about the real holocaust for fifty years in order to cover crimes too horrible to reveal are the promoters of “humanitarian” wars today, and have no moral authority over decent men. Their cries for troops mean broken hearts, their guns mean death, and their bombs for “peace and stability” mean destruction of innocent lives, so they must be soundly rejected and their perfidious lying laced with self-righteous hypocrisy shunned.

The election in Austria signals the end for lies of the “holocaust.” Conversely, it signals the beginning of truth and knowledge about the real holocaust of 9.3 million women, children, and men of German decent. There must be no more holocaust denial. Only by forthrightly facing this tremendous crime committed by the so called “democratic” nations and their communist allies against the defeated German survivors of World War II can we even begin to compensate for the lives destroyed as well as to insure such an event never happens again. Let us now begin discussion about The Holocaust and by doing so, build a better future for all of us.
A new and unforeseen weapon came into play at Hamburg—the firestorm. Martin Middlebrook describes one in The Battle of Hamburg. A thermal column of wind generated heat in excess of 1,400 degrees Fahrenheit, melting trolley windows and the asphalt in streets, the wind uprooting trees. When people crossed a street, their feet stuck in the melted asphalt; they tried to extricate themselves with their hands, only to find them stuck as well. They remained on all fours screaming. Small children lay like “fried eels” on the pavement. The firestorm sucked all the oxygen out of the city; a 15 year-old girl said that the brains of people in shelters “tumbled from their burst temples and their insides [extruded] from the soft parts under the ribs.”
Foot Notes:
1 Crimes and Mercies: The Fate of German Civilians Under Allied Occupation, 1944-1950. By James Bacque.
2 Senator Kenneth Wherry, statement of January 1946: “The American people should know once and for all that as a result of this government’s official policy they are being made…accomplices in the crime of mass starvation…Germany is the only nation subjected to a deliberate starvation policy…”
3 Auschwitz: The Final Count. The Barnes Review, September/October 1999. http://www.barnesreview.org
4 Bury My Heart At Wounded Berlin. By Michael A. Hoffman II. Revisionist History, No.3 1997. http://www.hoffman-info.com/
5 A Terrible Revenge. By Alfred de Zayas
6 Other Loses. By James Basque. 1989.
7 An Eye for an Eye. John Sack. 1995.


Posted by Ben on Tue, 08 May 2012 05:13 | #

Well, the answer is not here! Nor the bottom line of his doctrine about Jews . The answer is more prosaic and obviously eluded here in an redundant exercice de style.

He hate the Jews because of their domination over the economics, their ability to modulate a country’s destiny and name it…


Posted by Stephen on Mon, 21 May 2012 23:33 | #

My school education on WWII was as you expext one sided, history is writen by the winners. I believe history will prove Hitler was right about the destuctive nature of zionism. Isreal to this day is protected and funded by Britian and America. It is my unproved claim that Mossad were in some way resposible for 9/11. The five dancing Isrealis spings to mind. The International banking system is robbing as the media scare mongers untold debt through countless wars in the middle east on the average man. I do not want another war in Europe, but I fear the powers that be will resort to this to keep the status quo. There is a coming finacial crash that will take us to the brink.


Posted by Reza on Tue, 05 Jun 2012 18:17 | #

How come in west Jew allowed these article posted interesting, they control US media and politician and finance, and I should say this is a miracle that they allowed these be published. thanks God


Posted by XRay Vision on Sun, 01 Jul 2012 09:57 | #

@ Pip, #221:

ohh You’d think that the Jews would be spearheading the pro-life campaign.  After all, they are constantly bellowing about “never again” the wholesale slaughter of a group.  Do they deliberately ignore the fact that in 1920 Weimar—-13 years before Hitler took power—-abortion was legalized?  Do they deliberately ignore the connection between that and (a) the Hungerhaeuser in the 20’s, (b) the euthanasia program that started in ‘39 and finally (c) the Holocaust?  Do they deliberately ignore the legal/medical precedents, not to mention the collective callousing, created by legalized foetuscide? 

And what about the fact that Hitler allowed only Jewesses to have abortions:  should we then conclude that he was doing them a favor, allowing them to “control their own reproduction”? rolleyes


Posted by Jhon on Tue, 03 Jul 2012 13:42 | #

Jews dominate German Economic system… They were the “Key” player in German economy… As they control US economy and foreign policy today..  Jews engages USA to Israel enemies, so USA fighting war for Israel. ANd most interesting thing is that Jews are earning money from the war, which USA fight for them… bcs Most of the USA military companies owner are “JEWS”...


Posted by R W Rogers on Sat, 07 Jul 2012 12:56 | #

not many of the links are current

In a free society all topics should be discussed


Posted by Aspadistra on Mon, 23 Jul 2012 02:02 | #

The fact is, Jews cannot stop themselves from telling the truth about themselves.
You just have to know how to interpret what they say and write.
But that’s not too difficult to figure out:

Today, the No. 1 ‘enemy’ aka target of Jews is Iran.

To learn to read ‘Jew-think,’ anything bad that you hear a Jewish person (or a non-Jewish American politician or media person suborned by Jews) say about Iran, just switch the pronouns or subject-object:

If a Jew says, “Iran wants to kill all Israeli Jews,” that means “Jews want to kill Iranians.”

If a Jew says, “Iran’s leaders are irrational,” that means, “Israel’s leaders are irrational.”
If a Jew says, “Iran’s leaders are irrational and an irrational leader with nuclear weapons is a threat to humanity,”  it means:  “Israel’s leaders are irrational and irrational people with nuclear weapons are a threat to humanity.”

nb. (at a conference in DC in 2011 at which Hillary Mann Leverett (Jewish) and Ian Lustick (Jewish) were speakers, a (Jewish) woman asked: “Many of us are concerned that the most urgent foreign policy issue facing us today is how to restrain Israel from attacking Iran.  How can we ensure that Israel will not attack Iran?)

Make a tally sheet: What evil acts can be proved about Iran in the past 20 years? How many wars has Iran started, how many people has Iran killed, how many children has Iran caused to suffer? 

Now do the same thing for Israel:  How many wars has Israel started in the past 20 years?  How many people has Israel killed, how many children has Israel made to suffer?

You have to have evidence to fill in this tally sheet.
What do the objective facts of such a tally sheet show you?

If Israel is lying in plain sight about what it is doing and what its ‘enemy’ is doing today vs. what Israel is doing to its enemy, right now, what credibility does the Jewish state have concerning what happened in Germany from 1881 until 1948? (yes, 1881 is when Jews started to fubar the German people—see Eclectic magazine, 1881, “The Jews in Germany.”  google it; it’s online.

Gilad Atzmon, saxophonist extraordinaire and author of “The Wandering Who,” explained that, basically, Jews hate themselves because they see in the evil things they do the beast within. 

If you don’t have time to listen to the entire interview, at least listen to the last 10 or 15 minutes.  Atzmon explains Jewish “pre-traumatic stress disorder,” and then he explains how the evil acts that Jews do to Palestinians—like shooting Palestinian children with white phosphorus—horrify Jews about themselves.

“There is one more concept.  That is crucial for me to mention.
The more brutal you are to the Other the more tormented you become by the possibility that the other is as brutal as yourself. Easy.  If you are very vicious to your girlfriend you may imply that she may, as well, be as vicious as you.  If your girlfriend is helpless and you’re really aggressive toward her——- then you’re much more tormented because you realize that you are a beast. 
When you throw white phosphorus on Palestinian hospitals you must be tormented because they must be as well [gilad struggles here] as crazy as me.  And this is a devastating vicious circle.  And this is exactly the state of israel.  And they are more and more and more tormented. 
Why America is so so so so Americans are so afraid of Iran.  It’s because you – not you, but YOU nuked Hiroshima, Nagasaki, flattened ¾ of German cities with firebombs; 3 million in Viet Nam, 1.5 million in Iraq, so you know this is – you must think in these categories.  You project your genocidal tendencies on the Others. And this is where pre-traumatic stress matures into a vivid horrifying
What is the way around it. It’s funny.  Jesus.  Turn the other cheek.  This is the only way around it.  And this is what we need.  Now with aipac dominating your foreign policy you’re not going to turn the other cheek.  You’re strong enough to turn the other cheek.  You’re strong enough to tell the afghanis you know what, sorry, we start to bomb you with food now.  With electronics.  What you want?  It’s yours.  You are strong enough to do it.  But this is not what aipac is all about.
Thank you very much. [end of talk]”


Posted by jordansparks on Mon, 30 Jul 2012 06:23 | #

hahaha. thats not even how affirmative action works. its not based on the local population but the population of qualified applicants. but other than that, its just like what hitler did… except most leftists are trying to help folks that are different from them. which i guess is what hitler did? or not.


Posted by DJ on Mon, 30 Jul 2012 17:24 | #

A now deceased family member - born in the USA in 1916, but from 1922 until 1936 lived full time in Berlin. Yes, that Berlin, who served in the U.S. Army during WWII, whose father during the 1930’s arranged for numerous German families (Jewish and non Jewish) to get out of “Dodge” as it were as he saw the writing on the wall and compelled these Germans whom he professionally knew to find safe haven principally in the USA, to a lesser extent England as brokered by the man…........... The younger aforementioned always said that the Jews were far from innocent and brought their problems and hatred upon themselves via their ruthless conduct throughout Europe over decades upon centuries of same. The man was not an apologist for the Nazis - Hitler, rather an objective observer who told the truth. He always said the Jew was not innocent. While he never condoned what took place against them and again, served in the U.S. Army, he always made it fully clear that the Jew was not in the least innocent. The same holds true today all the more.


Posted by Andries Schack-Schackenborg on Wed, 15 Aug 2012 00:22 | #

I just wanted to chime in for a second to comment on the Bolshevik movement as a majority Jewish movement.  So Jews = Russians.  Is that about how it works?  You are an idiot.  The Bolsheviks were lead by ethnic Russians not Russian Jews.  Sorry to burst your bubble.  I suppose The Protocols of the Meetings of the Learned Elders of Zion is not always right.  I think it is rather ridiculous that no one can EVER be honest when talking about Adolph Hitler.  Its not a political thing.  He was human and he had definite details about him as did Third Reich Nazi Germany.  But, the bullshit that people spew (Jews and Christians and all nationalities alike) is profound and deep.  He hated Jews for many, many reasons.  He may have been partially or marginally Jewish himself (don’t discount self-hatred as reason for hating a group) as he continuously tried to court some Austrian Jewish aristocrat when he was in his 20’s.  That wouldn’t be appropriate for someone who was completely genetically non-Jewish.  Anyway, whatever he was needs to be talked about honestly.  There are A LOT OF PEOPLE AND GROUPS that exhibit extremely similar characteristics to the Nazi’s and Adolph Hitler and it really is a crime to still be bullshitting about a subject when a great example for understanding populistic fascism is at arms length.


Posted by Andries Schack-Schackenborg on Wed, 15 Aug 2012 00:47 | #

I almost forgot to mention this.  Anti-semitism by religious origin was created by the conflicts that the Catholic Church (the 1st huge manifestation of Christianity) arose when trying to move Jews from their positions as Jews.  It is too long to explain here.  If you really want to know then stop coming to this site for awhile and start spending time in academic history libraries.  So, the reasons for anti-Semitism are many and cannot be boiled down to a FEW PARAGRAPHS!  I hope you people are not dense enough to think that your few paragraph at a time remarks equate to a discussion meant to examine the truth of Anti-Semitism and Jewish hatred.  So, while they have been widely hated for what must be over 1500 years throughout Europe they have ALSO been around for a DAMN LONG TIME and in order to talk about the subject you have to go over THOUSANDS of years of history and historiographical data.  I think it is about time to knock of the internet blogger mindset moronicness.  YOU’RE NOT GOING TO FIGURE OUT THE ANSWER HERE because you’re not a conference of historians dedicated to the purpose of studying the subject of why Jews have been so hated throughout much of history.

Its silly to go on like this.  Either use time constructively for sensible conversations or find a way to create such a environment where those conversations can be had.  It doesn’t work to discuss a serious topic in this almost semi-gossipy and unintelligent manner.

If you come up with some great scholarship as to the Jewish question then you will become very, very famous.  But, this conversation is being hosted in some unfamiliar and remote web site because it is not a serious enough conversation to be hosted in a larger and more familiar forum or venue.  If any of you want to find the answer I suggest you bring the conversation out of this veritable alley onto a main street academic forum.


Posted by Kurtis on Sun, 26 Aug 2012 23:18 | #

Thanks for the auspicious writeup. It in fact used to be a entertainment account it.
Look complicated to far introduced agreeable from you! However, how
can we be in contact?


Posted by Fishmonger on Thu, 30 Aug 2012 00:56 | #

Here’s the problem with this:  - not all bankers are Jews, and not all Jews are bankers.  These criticisms are valid, but the confusion is in blaming Jews and not the capitalist system.  (I am a capitalist, btw, but see it’s inherent problems).  It’s all too easy to “personify” the problems by assigning them to a people.

But, one may say, a larger percentage of the infamous “1%” (as in “Occupy NY”) is Jewish - at least as far as one can guess by looking at the names on the list of the most wealthy people in the world.  Why would this be?

Well, historically, Christians were not permitted to charge interest via Catholic Church degree.  Jews were exempt from these laws, which kinda forced their hand into banking and like industries.

Think, folks, before you jump on a bandwagon that has resulted in a lot of injustice.  Whether it was 2 million or 6 million, we’re less than a century away from the largest mass murder in history.  The underlying passions that lead to anti-antisemitism start with ignorance.


Posted by Joshua on Wed, 05 Sep 2012 16:37 | #

Who cares why he hated the Jews. The fact is that he killed six million Jews in horiffic and barbaric ways.


Posted by emily on Tue, 11 Sep 2012 17:54 | #

i find myself at berlin being profoundly affected by all of the memories of the people that died and as i walk the street with the gold bricks next to the doorsteps of the people who were taken away in the middle of the night my heart is heavy with emotion as to how could someone pick a person especially a child and say that person is dieing bring that person to the concentration camps…as i sit at my hostel and look around the room to even think of picking a living person and saying that person shall die makes me cry and sick to my stomach…to see war and people shooting at each other such as syria you know that when an army shoots at you you shoot back…but to see bashar walk down the street and say grab that one and that one and that one and take one million people to the camps and kill them when they cease to work for us is unthinkable unimaginable and there needs to be answers…not that it happened or when or how many but as i walk to see berlin i ask myself and people yes but why? why would someone take innocent people and kill them? there must be a reason for this? i cant imagine a human being taking a living breathing person out of the room i can not fathom it let alone 6 million people.


Posted by CL on Tue, 11 Sep 2012 20:55 | #

emily said:

why would someone take innocent people and kill them? there must be a reason for this? i cant imagine a human being taking a living breathing person out of the room i can not fathom it let alone 6 million people.

Neither can anyone else, honey.  Neither can anyone else.


Posted by KAMRAN on Thu, 20 Sep 2012 22:00 | #



Posted by Jim Korpov on Tue, 16 Oct 2012 10:29 | #

I thought it was a good article until you began talking about American “Leftists” and betrayed a total lack of sense. You don’t seem to have the foggiest understanding of how affirmative action works, why it has been used, or who support it.


Posted by VINCI on Wed, 24 Oct 2012 09:14 | #



Posted by Zorg Yomzurahh on Wed, 31 Oct 2012 03:05 | #

“Judea declares war on Germany” , . type this on any search engine.

Also search for “Empire of Rothschild family” , . and “Rothschild family in Germany”.

You will find more information than you can view about jew and their AGENDA to ENSLAVE the World.


Posted by Zorg Yomzurahh on Wed, 31 Oct 2012 03:43 | #

Never mind the Hitler , . NOW THE REST OF THE WORLD HATE jews for MILLIONS OF REASONS.

One reason is that they are the only race with VERY LARGE NUMBER of GENETICALLY INHERITED DISEASE.
Any other races they mixup with the DISEASE spread further , . this problem has to be STOPED some where some day.

They are going to pay for this some day.

Reason THREE : They finance EVERY WAR to GAIN MORE WELTH by SUCKING the NATURAL RESOURCES of the poor countries they OCCUPY.

Reason FOUR : GENOCIDE is their TRADITIONAL SPORT ; in History of every Nation there are GENOCIDES and all have something in COMMON ; ALL ORCHESTRATED and FINANCED by the people of jewish ethnicity !?! , . all these problems can NOT be coincidence.

Reason FIVE and the rest are very EASY to guess ;say , .why are you dissatisfied with your Government ? why are you angry with the World media? why don’t you have your own house with swimming pool in it? (every jew has).
Why every porn company is run by jews?, . why every brothel is founded by a jew? , . why many scientist and engineer being killed by jews ? , . why in many countries the Schools are attached and students are shot ? , . if I continue this would become VERY LARGE LIST of JEWRY.

. . . WAKE UP people . .


Posted by Medieval historian on Sat, 03 Nov 2012 04:44 | #

A few comments on some of the assertions here :

There is no need to justify lor wonder at, Hitlers hatred of the Jews. It is well documented that the German people carried out vicious pogroms against the Jews many times over a thousand year period. A good Saturday night in an Alsatian town was getting drunk and finding some Jews to burn to death. This is recorded by the Germans themselves, as well as by multiple other sources. Read any history of the Crusades, the pogrom of Worms being one of the most spectacular slaughters. So Jew persecution was pretty well an established form of entertainment;

They simply hated them because they were different, and tended to live and marry into their own communities, and were not Christians (oh, yeah and they killed Christ). During most of of the Middle Ages, they were systematically marginalized, meaning they were banned from practicing most professions, which resulted in them only having a few avenues to make money, which is why they developed into moneylenders.  As money lenders they also had to be careful, because if they demanded their money too aggressively, they might end up as the weekend entertainment again. They were constantly being shuttled around, depending on who was in power, and what their attitude towards Jews was. They were only allowed to live certain places, and had to wear clothing that readily identified them as Jews. Most became independent merchants and were subjected to extra taxes.  The “crafty, smart Shylock” image comes to us from the fact that many Jews were well educated because their religion demanded basic reading and writing skills, which most non Jews did not have. And talk about bad media, it was they who were portrayed on churches still standing as monsters.

Despite all this, they managed to establish the first university in Europe and great centers of learning and medicine, and were advisors o many kings and queens. Strasbourg, Mainz and Worms were the golden triangle for learning, with people coming from all over the known world to study and teach. Great libraries were established, teaching mathematics and architecture.
Not all Germans disliked Jews, as is proven by the fact that most Jews in the world are Ashkenazi, meaning Jews who married into German families. That was so common hat the ministry for racial purity had a real hard time with the fact so many Germans were part Jewish, so much so, that they made the racial requirements very flexible. Many Jews who married into German families also converted to Christianity in the 15 th century, so they were indistinguishable from the rest of the population after a couple generations. DNA testing indicates that the European Jews began as a small group of men who left the area of the Middle East and made their way north to marry German women.  Uh oh , that makes for alot of Germans who think they are pure blooded but aren’t!

And as you history fans know, the entire basis of the royal houses of Europe is that they are the true descendants of Jesus Christ, a Jew.
Well, there’s so much more but one last thing, this point of proof. So if you want to ignore the eye witness statements, and there are plenty non Jewish ones, about the enormity of the holocaust, how about a little trip to the empty villages all over Germany and France that have stood empty since WWII . Why wouldn’t those inhabitants come back for their homes, their synagogues, their farms? Hmmmmm.
You men really should study your history in a much more broad perspective and read a wider range of primary resource books and papers.


Posted by MuckrakerW on Mon, 12 Nov 2012 23:20 | #

Hitler’s Sexual Orientation: False Speculations

I read a ton of comments posted all over the internet that dealt with Adolf Hitler’s sexual preferences, and I find on average most are anti-Hitler and anti-Nazism. If anyone knows anything in reality about Adolf Hitler, it is that he attempted to destroy the Jews and the Jewish religion in Germany, the mentally ill, misfits, and homosexuals. Since this blog is focused on homosexuality I will direct my argument to this topic and this topic only.

Adolf Hitler on his rise to power in Germany was in truth surrounded by homosexuals this is a given… moreover, many from the Nazi Party. Others, high ranking Germans over time that is, were more along the lines of perverts with odd sexual fetishes like paraphilia.

One of the most important facts about homosexuals that no one seems to be talking about these days is they [homosexuals and lesbians] have, and had an occult mystical philosophy, that goes back beyond the Spartan and Greek regimes during fifth and fourth century B.C., in which many homosexuals as well as bisexuals and lesbians were military personnel in these ancient armies, and took up the practice of homosexuality and lesbianism as part of an initiation process, or rite, and as such used this ongoing ritual to recruit into the Spartan or Greek military. The goal or objective by the state was to create a solid spiritual bond between the two homosexual partners. Usually one partner, a veteran warrior, was an older adult, and the other, a recruit, was a young male under the age of eighteen and an initiate for homosexual exploitation.

This homosexual bonding was analogous to the bond between an man and a women in marriage. It had been proven, overtime, to be most beneficial in military warfare psychologically.

So it is prosaic to argue that homosexuals, bisexuals or lesbians, are not new at all to military life, nor is their mystical occult philosophy founded on perversion and bonding. Moreover, one can hypothesize that inclusive in such a mystical ancient rite, psychotropic drugs, aphrodisiacs, like Alkyl Nitrates, and love potions, were integrated into the sexual experience to heighten the pleasure and increase the level of passion to extreme imaginings.

In truth, it is pure speculation to argue that because of this, anyone in the company of such people [homosexuals or lesbians] are themselves homosexual. Or that they condone the cult. Or they are somehow potentially a latent facsimile, but for some unknown reason are unable to open up and surrender to their true sexual passions.

This is totally false. I would ask, “Where is your undisputed evidence?” You who believe or hold to the theory that Adolf Hitler was a homosexual. “What letters, pictures, government documents, etc. have you gotten hold of… validated by people who knew Hitler personally? Or have you spoken with any of Hitler’s relatives before they died and they themselves revealed Hitler’s sexual orientation to you?” All the data from the time Hitler lived, does not denote or connote Hitler’s sexual preference as being of the same gender. It does suggest that Hitler had normal heterosexual affairs with at least six women found in documentaries such as the Rise and Fall of Adolf Hitler.

Undoubtedly, whatever Hitler was historically, one fact is certain… he meant to rid Germany of the Jews and homosexuals. I am positive, if he had-of succeeded and conquered the world… in time he would have purged his military of top ranking German officials, potential threats to his dictatorship, who were confessed homosexuals, or that Hitler personally knew were gay by association. One must not forget that the Jewish race, if I might call the Israelites this in order to make a point, has homosexual in it too. Hitler could have at some point interacted socially with these people and didn’t know they were either homosexual or Jewish.

Furthermore, Jewish hatemongers nowadays in 2012, and others sympathetic to the Jewish plight in Germany during the reign of Hitler and Nazism, believe it is necessary to destroy the image of such a dictator and world anti-Semite as Adolf Hitler by any means possible, even lies. But what about Henry Ford? What about Jews who donated money to Hitler’s political campaign for the Chancellorship? Or, all the corporations and mid-sized companies, worldwide and most still in existence today, that supported Hitler and the Nazis? I think the Jewish conspiracy to mar the character of Adolf Hitler is destine to fail.

The fact-of-the-matter is Hitler was a tyrant. He hated Jews and any other race that wasn’t of so-called Aryan blood, whatever Aryan blood is supposed to have meant in Hitler’s mind in terms of racial superiority. In addition, he had a fixation for world dominance and power. This is the Hitler I have come to know in my quest to understand the man’s true nature and pursuits as a dictator. This is the character I am sure… defined Hitler for who he really was.

In summary, was Hitler a homosexual? I would conclude he was not. I would conclude the man’s ambitions and passions were to daring and surreal for him to engage in petty, perverted practices like homosexuality, if he intended to reach his goals and remain there once in absolute world power. Trust, on the other hand historically, has rarely been embraced by any ruler of the past. Hitler knew this. He also knew in order for him to remain in absolute power as a global dictator he was going to have to eventually eliminate everyone at the top and bottom who posed a potential threat to his right to rule. Finally homosexuals were too dangerous to be trusted when it came to loyalty and sacrifice. They would eventually breach Hitler’s trust by sexual fraternization or reckless promiscuity with the enemy, Jews and non-Jews or Germans, homosexuals and non-homosexuals, by extraneous stealth manipulation over time seeking power for themselves and their conniving same-sex-lovers. Hitler also knew this. And this… I and convinced is why he married Eva Braun before committing suicide… to guard against there being any mistaking his heterosexuality for homosexuality or his ultimate intentions…. 

© 11/12/2012 Muckraker Wesley McCants

The two most threatening individuals to the perpetuation of the heterosexual society is the bisexual male and female.


Posted by Lurker on Tue, 13 Nov 2012 10:30 | #

The two most threatening individuals to the perpetuation of the heterosexual society is the bisexual male and female.

You talk as if ‘heterosexual society’ were some recent fad. And bisexual males are pretty rare, so rare that the idea that there are enough of them, would ever be enough of them, to overturn society is a nonsense.


Posted by Smiley on Mon, 19 Nov 2012 11:25 | #

<u>can somebody tell me if this information is correct?</u> gulp


Posted by Somebodyfromindia on Sat, 24 Nov 2012 01:50 | #

From my limited understanding of the whole Hitler Scenario comes out the fact that

1. He killed a majority of people. German people. Be it Jews or the homosexuals or the “traitors”. He killed Germans.
2. Since the beginning he was obsessed about purity.
3. The Swastika and the symbol of Aryan race that he too upon stands in complete shackles since the matter of the fact is Germans are not “ARYANS”.

His glorification or the Aryanization of Germany was based and stood on lies. Aryans are a branch of Indo-europeans who moved to the Indian subcontinent via Iran around 1500BC. And this stock had nothing to do with the Germans.
Swastika, again was not an Aryan symbol. It sprang up in the civilization of Harappa which existed around 2500 BC.

Jews were living in the European lands since 2000 years. And to alienate a stock of ethnic population residing at a place since 2000 years seems unreasonable to be. Working on the same lines the whole of America and the new world countries should feel and stand alienated aye?

Also I dont care if the jews of Germany took decisions which were viewed as devastating from the German bloc and Hitler stepped forward to just voice the general public, the fact of the matter remains. He killed millions of people. Millions of Innocent lives lost. Shouldnt that be a center of study?

Also I am clueless as to why Historians since a long time have based studies on the political scenarios rather than the society and lives of people. Just something to ponder about.

Spock out.



Posted by Kurly Jewish guy76 on Sun, 25 Nov 2012 04:53 | #

The greatets part of the sekret is this, Hitler hated the Jews bekause his father was a Jew. Bekause his father abused physikally and hated his nother bekause she was Krhistian and for this reason Hitler hated the Jews. Hitler has had a biolent fanily and grown up with biolense and problens in the fanily. Thats what I habe learned by an infornation of a espert Unibersity student.  He told ne. I learned fron hin.  I was thankful for the infornation he gabe it to ne.  Thanks for taking the tine.


Posted by bluebird on Fri, 30 Nov 2012 05:59 | #

I think some are not seeing what is behind Hitler mentality. Hitler coaxed people into following him by using fear tactics.
What is really amazing is that many in our nation are numb to fear tactics not even recognizing them for what they are.
When 13 military people and one infant are openly and blatantly murdered by our enemy and there is no recompense that is
fear mongering. When the US Government does not openly identify an obvious attack on freedom that is fear mongering. When a militant can stand at a voting poll and harass potential voters without the Government plainly condemning such action that is fear mongering. This is the way the US government warns us that they can completely fail us and abuse us and we had better act like nothing happened. When a known terrorist hides and runs from us during the reign of one President and then this murderer is openly accepted as a speaker under the next president we have problems. Ghadafi confessed to killing more than 125 passengers by bombing a commercial airliner. GOT THAT FELLOW AMERICANS—-THIS IS NOT REPUBLICAN PROPAGANDA (though we do see a lot of it at other times)—-THIS IS AN ADMITTED TERRORIST AND MURDERER.

Ghadafi openly accepted and embraced by both George Bush and Barak Obama. Now, what does it take to make the American public understand we are in trouble. These leaders are not in office to help us, but to destroy us.


Posted by john thames on Wed, 05 Dec 2012 08:13 | #

If the author of this nonsense really believes his false analogy between Jews and blacks, he is a fool. Whites are not responsible for black failure but Jews provably do cheat and swindle non-Jews per their Talmudic scriptures - as well as deliberately discriminate in favor of their own. Stop comparing apples and oranges.


Posted by Joe on Fri, 07 Dec 2012 23:52 | #

Jews have been hated, in my review of history ,because of what they represented in different time periods. If someone comes up to you and tells you that your pagan religion or beliefs are detestable in Gods eyes, you will instantly make an enemy. Thats part of most of their history as shown in their own holy scriptures. But at this point all religions tend to believe that but we are tought to respect other religions.

But, even their own holy scriptures has condemned Jews many times through their prophets for their evil acts, hypocracy, traitors and for their ambitious love of money. They are also known for killing a very significant Jew, Jesus Christ. So basically, killing a peoples religious martyr will make you not so well liked. Their are still African Americans and Native American Indians that feel a certain hatred towards white Americans for a targic recent past. This is not merely a coincidence that past hostility lingers with the passage of time.

One of the most significant reasons why in the 20th century Jews were hated was and is beacuse of their ability to continue to get under the skin of manby cultures. This mind you, is not all Jews, just those in control or power. Zionists are not well looked upon because of their violent ambitions angainst Palestinians. This genocide of a less fortunate people has been going on for decades without any international concern. Deja Vu, the same thing Hitler did to Jews now Jews are doing to someone else.

It is possible that the Rothchild Family may also be behind some of the hatred against Jews. The Rothchilds are by far richest family on Earth. They have been known to finance wars on both ends and making great wealth with the blood on the innocent. Although it is truly unfair to condemn all Jews because of what a few have done, well we are currently doing the same towards middle eastern peoples because of a few terrorists.

It is very possible Hilter wanted to eliminate Rothchild bankers and those alike that may have been ruining Germanys financial system, while “enslaving” pure German citizens with fiat currency. Thsi is what has happened to America now and thats why the rest of the world is in financial crisis. The Rothchilds are still in control of the world and they are german-jews. Once again, we should not hate an entire race because of the acts of a few. Jews however have had the misfortunate history to have many negative characters that contribute to their anti-semitic problems. Of course, this does not justify abuse of any type towards other peoples.

Nowadays Americans are hated world wide for their policing the world. Hence the term anti-American. This hatred is based not on what all Americans do but on those few politicians, corporations and the military complex that nerture hatred towards Americans for the benefit of their hidden agenda’s. Agendas that people like Eisenhauer, Kennedy, even recently Ron Paul have brought to light.

This subject is delicate and wide that applies to many peoples not just Jews. If a hispanic walks into a middle class white neighborhood, he will get the look of , “what do you want, you don’t belong here, did you come here to steal, are you legal in the country?” History repeats itself many times with many peoples, some more than others. Jews being the most constant in our human history. Some things are warranted others jsut myth, this too applies to all cultures on Earth.

Excuse my grammer I have multiple languages in my head and I’m typing fast. In the end, there are people in high positions with hidden agendas that are not so well hidden and can be found. If you look at who will benefit most out of countries going bankrupt, the constitution of a country being ignored, manipulation of the media, elections, politicians, the lack of transparency government, the federal reserve, the assasination of our most decorated leaders ... you will find a sad truth.

But you will die if you look to deep ... guess what, your not really free to think outside the box or ask these questions. Your freedom is being legislated away without us even knowing about it. The same secretive way the federal reserve came into existence other entities are coming into exeistence but we wont know about until its to late.

Open your minds to your sad realities ...



Posted by mrodent on Thu, 13 Dec 2012 14:38 | #

Hitler hated the Jews bekause his father was a Jew.

Not really… Hitler hated the Jews because his father was a shape-shifting Reptoid from the star system around Aldebaran.  He hated the Internet for the same reason.  He was way ahead of his time.


Posted by Thepeacefuldude on Wed, 19 Dec 2012 14:49 | #

Honestly I think most of the people here doubting the holocaust, or even saying it was a good thing that people died are insane. Who wishes death on anyone if not a crazy person? I honestly find it hard to believe that people actually believe what they are saying. How can someone hate someone for being of an ethnic background that seems nutty to me. You can’t blame one group of people for everything that’s just stupid. There’s bad people in this world yes, they could be jewish, christian, muslim, black, white, that will never change, bad people should be punished for being bad not for being jewish or w.e they are. There can be a crazy christian saying to kill all muslims or something, does that mean all Christians are as insane as thae one person? Nope. Because people have there own will. and as long as we have free will there will always be bad peole in the world. I honestly don’t see how anything in this world will ever change with people who just pick violent ways, and to pick other people to blame other than themselves.  People themselves are naturally greedy, greed isn’t only a jewish thing as people seem to think, it’s a humanity thing. I know theres nothing I can say to change your mnds or to make you feel differently so don’t try to make me feel differently, I honestly wish that everyone could just get a long and stop all the hate. Because all this hate will get us nowhere. and frankly we’ve been nowhere in this world for far too long. Hate turns into more hate turns into more hate turns into more hate, why is it that hitler didn’t teach to love everyone equally, he had such a strong impact yet the things that stuck with people is the hatred of people just because theyre a jew? Thats insane believe it or not. What I’m trying to say I guess is, I wish somehow I could make the world love eachother I wish I could be as good a speaker as hitler was and try to lead thr world down a path that doesn’t involve so much hate and violence. I agree there are some bad jewish people, theres bad white people,christian people, catholic people, regardless of what you are there is always someone who is bad or an evil person.  and to the people who say the holocaust didn’t happen? really!?? that’s the most ridiculous thing i’ve ever heard in my entire life. First off there is images of these camps and of even dead bodies, and of fuckin piled up clothes and shoes of the dead but I guess some evil jew photoshopped those huh? Auschwitz was real period. There are survivors of the holocaust that prove it exists oh wait no they’re jewish they must be lying, they sent a jew msg with their mind powers and told all jews to lie about it. I wish people could see how like crazy their view is, regardless of if the number of the dead is exaggerated who the hell cares? People died does it matter how many? i for one wouldn’t like it if 3 jews were killed or better yet 3 people why wou;d I want anyone to die? To me the evil people are the people who wish death on anyone, or people who hate just to hate, you cant categorize a group of people because everyone is different and everyone has their own mind. I’m white but i might not be like all white people because I’m unique and have my own brain and my own will. I do not follow the white rule book if there is one, nor do i think jews follow some sort of jewish rule book on how to dominate the world lol. To get what you have you have to want it, if I want to be in politics I do it, If i wanna do something with media I do it, you don’t do it because your jewish you do it because you want it. If you want something bad enough you get it done simple as that , and maybe thats what they teach their children if you want something you do it it’s not that hard a lesson as I’m sure many of you were told the same thing. I mean come on children died too do you people have like no heart? I mean honestly children….families died how can you sit there and say it didn’t happen? like ugh its so frustrating, I’m here because I like this girl and after a loooong night of talking we got into some stuff and I found out she was racist against jewish people, I asked her why and she didn’t really have a clear answer, and said adolf hitlers name I couldn’t believe my ears, it kind of sucks cause she was amazing till I found that out it’s kind of a turn off when a girl tells you she thinks the world would be better off without a group of people just because theyre that people thats so insane to me, Ive gotten like no sleep so forgive m sucky grammar and puncuation i rly don’t care right now for that, just wanted to get this off my chest, I hope you all don’t bash me or anything I know I won’t change your minds and you won’t change mine, I just wish we could get a long you know what ever happened to everyone wanting peace in the world lol. I;ve notice no one even does the peace sign that often anymore o.o kind of spooky lol. well hopefully one day the world will be the way I see it in my dreams. Until then I’ll be living in my make belive world where racism is gone and everyone loves eachother smile what a great place that would be sigh


Posted by Daisy Gaeta on Mon, 07 Jan 2013 02:56 | #

big surprise i Actually didn’t do my homework and you know i just wanted to post a comment because i read this other article and it was so sad i was with my parents so i tried not cry because it said and i quote ” it took about 20-22 minutes to stop screaming and yelling because they were burning to death. then someone they trusted would go in and retrieve and jewelry, gold teeth, hair, etc.” i think that what hitler did was absolutely cruel and cold blooded. i am so glad that he kille dhimeself or elseI’m pretty sure           i would’ve. shock


Posted by Robin Thomas on Tue, 08 Jan 2013 04:30 | #

Pick up a copy of “The Culture of Critique” and you’ll understand what’s going on.
I don’t hate anybody, but clearly Jewish influence has been VERY damaging to all of white/
western civilization. My hope is that the powerful/elite Jews will back off from ruining the white countries….
allow us to stop massive third world immigration, stop abortion, affirmative action, etc.
If whites as a group begin to raise hell and demand that the Jews behave themselves, it’s a win/win.
On the other hand, if the Jews persist in trying to displace and destroy the white world…..
there will be hell to pay, and the Jews themselves will no doubt be the biggest losers in the history
of man.


Posted by LOBERNE BELIZI on Thu, 10 Jan 2013 09:05 | #

<strong></strong>my question is, where were the powerful countries during that time who could have prevented this horrible thing from happening? maybe they were all blinded as Hitler was, otherwise history would be different for the Jews. the holocaust cannot be done by a human being, it is indescribable! i have been to Yad Vashem in Jerusalem and have seen those pictures of the holocaust, until now, I keep on wondering about what kind of human beings did these. i believe that all men are created equal, no Germans or Jews in the eyes of God. I also believe that the Bible will prove itself true in the last days, remember that the Jews are the chosen people and God cannot just ignore such a crime inflicted on His people.


Posted by Riyaz khan on Fri, 01 Feb 2013 10:35 | #

Who cares why he hated the Jews. The fact is that he killed six million Jews in horiffic and barbaric ways.<strong></strong>


Posted by raj on Fri, 08 Mar 2013 21:04 | #

damn fuck you hitler.. damn fuck all germans of that time..hitler u fucking dog got self a easy death.. u will suffer pain till you take birth..germans u also fuck off your defected ass..


Posted by John on Tue, 02 Apr 2013 21:16 | #

Hey guys i have many jewish friends, and I don’t understand you hate,
But why dont you look for yourself
Maybe the Jews are smarter and maybe just cunning,
search for Nobel price award (I hope you trust google that was invented by Jews ..)
And see the amount of Jews wining the price (even compare to any race you like….)
Now maybe this is Jews over there that(..) pick such a high rate of Jews.
Look for iq tests of Jews vs any outer race.. I want an answer for that..
But please check everything from objective point of view..
A lot of Jews do have a lot of money (I think because they are smart, I know you do not agree..)
But look how many jews dont.. (why do so many Jews choose to study math, physics.. How do they manipulate everyone with that??)



Posted by Joe on Tue, 02 Apr 2013 22:59 | #

Einstein was a plagiarist :


Search terms : ” Albert Einstein Plagiarist”

      ” Albert Einstein The Incorrigible Plagiarist”

        ” Christopher Jon Bjerknes “


Posted by Joe on Tue, 02 Apr 2013 23:32 | #

About that other “great” jew, Jonas Salk :

Search term : ” Medical Experiments + Jonas Salk + NaturalNews.com”

              ” Vaccines Didn’t Cure Polio After All + The HealthRebel.com”

I tried to link to the websites but for some reason the links weren’t connecting. The search terms will access a lot of info about Jonas Salk the fraud.


Posted by Joe on Wed, 03 Apr 2013 00:36 | #

About Jewish IQ’s :

Search term : ” Israeli Military IQ Test Results “

Every Jew in Israel has to serve in the military. Every Jew in Israel gets an IQ test via the military. The results are nothing for Jews to brag about.

The mainstream media greatly inflates Jewish IQ #‘s. I guess we’re expected to stand in awe of their incredible intelligence: It’s all bullshit. Read the results of the Israeli IQ tests. Nothing to brag about. IQ scores in white Europe are higher than the average mean of Jewish IQ #‘s.

I tried linking to two websites from Israel but the connection is not working. The search term will access the info about the rather mediocre Jewish IQ scores.


Posted by John s on Wed, 03 Apr 2013 12:03 | #

Joe you seem like a smart guy, did you study physics in high school?
I just can’t understand how can you say Einstein wasen’t among the greatest scinetist ever lived?
It’s like you say newton theory is bulshit..
But first let me say the fact (we’ll argue later..) that Jews are smarter
Don’t make them better then me or you in any way..
Just as the fact that some African American run better then me font make them gods..
There are many intelligence types,many Jews better then most of us in a few..
As much as you don’t see meny Jews do well in sport..
Jews do have some talent, all Hollywood is filled with Jews ..
But how many Jewish actors do you know?
Most of The known actors the big stars aren’t Jewish, only the producers are…
Does Jews more pretty or more happy because they have high scors in FEW kinds of intelligence??
I believe that the answer is no.. They have there strongs sides but also the weakest ..
That is my view thanks for the time..
About Jews iq: I saw the data you sent more, and its correct but don’t forget it mix Jews who came from Arab country’s , as they live in Israel as well..
And to show you what I mean:
Look at number 81 and you’ll see that you had the correct data, but not full..


Posted by Joe on Wed, 03 Apr 2013 13:21 | #

@ Johns*

I don’t care to get into a discussion about how intelligent Jews are. It’s a boring topic :

A : Jews aren’t as intelligent as the mainstream hype would lead one to believe.

B : Yes, Einstein was a plagiarist. Yes, Salk was a fraud. It’s part of the historical record now. I didn’t just make-it-up.

C : Darkmoon is Not a website to go to for Truth. It’s all about disambiguation and debates based on pure emotion, lies of omission, lies of commission, half-truths, quarter-truths, and many times : Zero truth, and playing on people’s prejudices and false premises . The false premises coming from the mainstream media ; Darkmoon then plays on those false premises to dump even more false premises on the readership, while feigning to be a website about truth : Nothing could be further from the truth ; It’s a controlled website. Probably out of Israel . The whole website oozes & reeks of donmeh jew bullshit. We see Lasha under some kind of Arabic veil, we see One eye, we don’t see her other eye. Two eyes would be too straight-forward and honest ;  It’s right there : The webmaster is telling us right there in the picture of Lasha that’s it’s a donmeh Jew website. I can’t be bothered**.

D : The IQ results from the Israeli military are solid and factual. Darkmoon is about disambiguation and half/truths at best [ complete lies at many other times ].

E : Yes, I knew a Jewish “actor” once. The first apt I had in Manhattan after I moved from my parent’s home in the Bronx ( I was 18) I shared with two Jews. One became a drug addict. He over-dosed. Died when he was about 28. He wasn’t a bad fellow—just very confused. I felt sorry for him. I liked him.

The other Jew - an Israeli—was trying to be an actor in NYC. He was a failure. Long story, I’ll make it short. This Jew Israeli went around New York City conning elderly Jewish women out of their savings. At that, he was a great actor, at conning elderly Jewish women out of their savings he was excellent. The few of the elderly women I did happen to know, I told them not to trust this Israeli. They didn’t listen to me : I was a “goyim” so they didn’t believe me.

They were Not wealthy Jewish women either who could afford to lose some money. The elderly Jewish women this Israeli stole from were retired garment workers on limited and small pensions. It still would have been wrong if the Israeli stole from the wealthy—but at least wealthy types can absorb the loss, and still pay the bills. One of the elderly women had to move in with her daughter because this Israeli “actor” stole her complete life savings. Yes, I knew a Jewish actor once.

The Jews are a mixed bag of nuts just like every other group. Overall, I’m not as favorably impressed with your tribe as would like me to be. I’m Never going to be as favorably “impressed” with your tribe as you would like : End of discussion.

I studied physics in college. One of my favorite subjects :

1 : History

2 : Physics

3 : Anthropology

* Keep checking in for my on-going series concerning Jew frauds. The next posts will be about Jew frauds in the women’s liberation movement/abortion legalization movement in the 1960s/1970s.

** Give my regards to Gilbert Huntly, the manly-man rancher and genteel and sensitive poet. He was a friend to Eustace Mullins [ as per Huntly : And I’m friends with James Bond ].

Eustace Mullins : One of the most honest historians ever. Did you ever read Eustace Mullins’ :

” Eustace Mullins + The Secret Holocaust pdf ”

It’s all about how your jew tribe behaves after they take over a country and impose the Jew Noahide laws from the jew Talmud. It’s about the mass-murder of white Christians in the Jew’s Soviet Union. It’s a must read.

Do you think Hollywood will ever make a movie about the Jew mass-murderers of the Soviet Union ? Jews are an atavistic people, to a large degree, hence all the propaganda and media-hype about how wonderful Jews are : It’s to cover up the true—and truly—atavistic nature of the Jew.


Posted by John on Sat, 06 Apr 2013 18:59 | #

Hey joe
I steel think that Jews are like any outer human
Some very good people some very bad..
But everyone are like that
I don’t think that there is any race that is different ..
I think it’s great that you intrasted in many regions.
But I want to advise you for you self to look better if you’re wrong
Life is to great and short to hate anyone
I think you should talk to Jews more, I know you already have
Wish you much luck with everything,
Tip from me:try to see the best in anyone and make as much frindes as you can
(race/believe don’t metter )


Posted by Joe on Sat, 06 Apr 2013 20:24 | #

@ John

Life is great, this is true : A great Gift from the Holy Creator.

You would enjoy life more if you learn English grammar, and proper English spelling.

You would be in a much better position to articulate your thoughts more cogently, and subsequently be better able to express your immense gratitude to the Holy Creator for the great Gift of Life.

True intelligence is born of gratitude in the heart for the great Gift of Life ; True gratitude in one’s heart leads to true curiosity about this magnificent and mysterious world we’re born into ; In turn, true curiosity —which is born of gratitude —leads one to be curious, for example, about one’s language, which in-turn compels one to actually learn one’s language, including rules of grammar and proper spelling.

I wasn’t born in America. I was born in Italy. Italian is my native language, not English. I greatly appreciate the English language, however ; It’s a language I find very rich and expressive; But first, one must learn English rules of grammar and proper English spelling in order to be properly understood by the rest of the English-speaking world. Otherwise, one may appear to be rather retarded.

If I—a foreign-born American—can learn the rules of English grammar, and learn to spell correctly, it should be a cinch for you : All you need is some gratitude in your heart for the great Gift of Life. Plus, some gratitude in your heart for Authentic European cultural heritage may also help compel you to learn The Language, so no one will come to the conclusion you’re retarded.


Posted by John on Sat, 06 Apr 2013 22:15 | #

Dear joe
I have the feeling you are offended by me, I don’t know why, and sorry if
I said something to offend you I did not mean to..
I know my English isn’t perfect, but this kinds of Discussions is the way to improve it,
I hoped you’ll choose to ignore that fact, and focus on the content.
I would be offended by the nick name you gave me
If it had some grasp in riality..
and again talk with more people that you don’t agree with
And hear their opinions, something I use to do, you will loose nothing by doing it..


Posted by Joe on Sat, 06 Apr 2013 23:32 | #

@ John

Congratulations to you, it’s about time : You wish to improve your English skills , the best thing really is to get yourself an English tutor. Or,

If you know for sure “this kinds of Discussions is the way to improve” your English, then most assuredly you’re better off staying with Lasha’s Darkmoon.Middle.East.  website. You mentioned the other day how much you like Lasha the donmeh jew— who tells half-truths at best—usually has Zero truthful things to say.

Still, Darkmoon is not totally useless, at least for someone such as yourself who lacks basic communication skills, and subsequently it naturally follows your comprehension abilities seriously lack, seriously.

Gilbert Huntly at Darkmoon—in addition to being a tough manly-man rancher—is also a genteel Southern gentleman and sensitive-soul-humanitarian-type- poet , as you also are sensitive to people’s feelings ; Plus Gilbert was a friend of Eustace Mullins—the Bestest and the Mostest Grattiss historean ever ever—So I know you’ll learn a lot if you stick with Darkmoon.Middle.east. website.

You offend me not, for I’m not a sensitive soul like you and Gilbert are ; You do, however, offend the English language, very much so.

Still there’s some small hope—a wee bit of light—as you show a vague and tentative desire to improve your decrepit English skills ; Perhaps the following article—and the beautiful, poetic, graceful English so-contained in following article—will compel you to think, to study, to learn, to understand, to comprehend, the great Gift of Life more, and perhaps will finally compel you to learn The Language :


As it’s palpable your heart is full of peace, love, and understanding, I know for sure you’ll appreciate the knowledge contained in said-above article I so considerately link to, as to help you along on your first few baby steps to learning The Language.

Let me know if the link doesn’t work. I’ll be glad to re-link until such time link does indeed work : As I so do want to see you improve your English skills, so you’ll be better able to express your profound gratitude to the Holy Creator for the great Gift of Life.

Search Term :” Cambriawillnotyield + Nazis”

There are many more articles via above search term for you to read about the subject of Nazis and Jews , and Hitler, John, once you learn the basics. You show a deep interest in the subject, only because you want the best possible world for everyone, of course.


Posted by Joe on Sun, 07 Apr 2013 01:53 | #

@ John

I hope my various viewpoints about jews don’t have you falling to pieces. I can tell you’re very very concerned because I’m not as favorably impressed with jews as you would like me to be ; Because you, like Gilbert Huntly over at the donmeh jew website Darkmoon.MiddleEast—are a very very sensitive soul who is striving mightily—yes sirre—for the most-best and nicest-nice-nice possible world for Everyone.

So you most likely are a bit hurt because you’re a very very sensitive soul, and when someone such as myself comes around—- who is Not as favorably impressed with jews as you would like me to be, and most assuredly will Never be—Well, I hope you’re not falling to pieces, that’s all ; I know I’m not, that’s for sure :



Posted by Joe on Sun, 07 Apr 2013 02:46 | #

In this sad time when so many WN’ers are left bereft, and are mourning the loss of the “patriotic” fifth-columnist jew Auster, I hope, far be it from me ; Well, I pray I’m not blaspheming the “holy” name of the jew fifth-columnist “A”  by mentioning the name of one of the most honest and true—and truly—patriotic American historians : Eustace Mullins.

Mullins—a patriotic White, Christian American, struggled hard in his life to bring us truth. He greatly suffered for it ; He paid a very heavy price to bring us Truth. He fought a great battle and won ; To a large degree, he won : He won for us some Truth, a lot more truth than we had before Mullins’ struggle. Mullins gives us more truth than all the “honest” jews online put together then some.

Yet, Mullins goes unsung by WN’ers as they fawningly laud the jew fifth-columnist Auster, and sing Auster’s praises-to-the-Heavens. Yet, WN’ers had nothing much to say when Mullins, one of our own, one of our own & one of the most honest and patriotic historians as well, passed-away.

It would benefit everyone to read Mullins, and also learn of his life story.  All his work can be found online. To read his erudite and excellent truthful work, and learn about his life struggle to bring us Truth :





Posted by kaitlynn seymour on Tue, 09 Apr 2013 15:36 | #

hello this doesn’t help much just barley so i really cant figure anything out on this web site about why Hitler hated Jews!


Posted by Joe on Tue, 09 Apr 2013 16:14 | #

@ kaitlynn seymour

The focus of Majority Rights is not why Hitler hated Jews. Go read John Kaminski, the jew-Nazi-jew : the jew-Nazi-jew Kaminski explains why Hitler hated Jews.

Also, the donmeh Jew website Darkmoon.me details why Hitler hated Jews.


Posted by Joe on Tue, 09 Apr 2013 17:36 | #

If Hitler hated Jews so much why did he only kill the low-level Jews opposed to Zionism? Why he no kill all Jews? If Hitler loved White People so much why he import so many dark-skinned Islamic jihadists into Europe? Why he no concentrate on helping White People instead of working with donmeh Jews from Middle East to start the radical war-mongering Muslim Brotherhood in 1928 with dark-skinned donmeh Jews from Egypt and Turkey ?

Why Hitler no help the White Catholics who were thrown into the IG Farben slave work camps and/or brutally murdered ? Why he no like Catholics? European Catholics are White People, No?

If Hitler hate Jews so much why so many Zionist Jews in Third Reich? Why no Hitler get rid of the Zionist Jews in the Third Reich? Why he love his dark-skinned Islamic jihadist warriors so much? Why he love his Zionist Jews so much?

Why Hitler no love devout Catholics and sincere Protestant Christians? Why did sincere Christians in Nazi occupied areas suffer so much because of the Nazis? I thought Nazis love White People? No? The sincere Catholics and the sincere Protestant Christians in Europe during WW2 were White People, No?

Why Hitler let so many wealthy Jews leave Germany before throwing the Jews into the slave work camps? Why he no throw the big-shot wealthy Jews in camps also? They big trouble-makers, No?

Why Nazis let trouble-making Jews leave Germany, why Nazis focus on only the low level Jews opposed to Zionism? No make sense, Yes?

Why Hitler spend so much time killing sincere Catholic-White-People and sincere Protestant Christian-White-People, while simultaneously killing low level Jews opposed to Zionism, while also simultaneously allowing the big-shot Zionist Jews—many donmeh Jews also—escape Germany before the holocaust started?

Why all-American Bush family and all-American Rockefeller family bank-roll the Third Reich? Why very very very rich Jews in America and England bank-roll the Third Reich? No make sense Hitler let Jews bank-roll Hitler if Hitler no like Jews, Yes? Why no very very very rich Jews no help low-level Jews ?

Why Menachem Begin join Nazis in killing Jews, for example ? The Jew Soros family were Nazis too. Why Jew Soros family steal so much $$$ from their fellow Jews? That’s Not nice, No?

Why no SPLC try to stop the jew-Nazi-jew Kaminski from fomenting Nazism?

If White -People-Race so smart and so honest, why wonderful White-People-Race be so stupid to follow the Jews—especially the most dastardly kind of Jews—the donmeh Jews? I thought White-People-Race be smart, No?

Maybe White-People-Race be not too smart ? Maybe only the White-Hyperboraen-People-From-The-Valhalla-Mountains-Of-Thule-Island-Be-Smart, and sincere Catholics and sincere Protestant Christians be stupid, Yes?

Maybe White-Hyperborean-People-From-Thule-Be-Really-Really-Smart-Like-John-De-Nugent who is a Fuck-Buddy with the jew-NAZI-jew Kaminski ? Why all Nazis be named “John” ? : John Kaminski, John de Nugent, John “Friend”?

Why they no like sincere Christians - Protestant and Catholics - why do they spend so much time denouncing Christians if they no like Jews?

Well, “Hello this doesn’t help much “—not at all even—“I can’t figure anything out on this website about why Hitler hated ” sincere Christians, especially devout Catholics!


Posted by Joe on Wed, 10 Apr 2013 02:59 | #

@ Rabbi Lipschitz

What do you and your fellow learned Rabbis say after reading about this ? What’s the rabbinical exegesis concerning the scientific test proving Hitler had Jew/North African blood/DNA? :


What do you think about the Jew Israel’s Sharak’s , “The Weight of 3,000 Years” ?

What do you think about The Fact so many Donmeh Jews in Turkey were responsible for conjuring-up “Aryanism/Nazism”, as a religion, as a political movement, as a military power?

What do you think about your fellow Jew Henry Makow who discusses the role of Donmeh Jews in world affairs?

http://www.henrymakow.com/  [ search archives]

What about Dietrich Bronder’s, “Bevor Hitler Kam”?

What about Sebettondorff’s, “Bevor Hitler Kam”. Sebettendorff, one of the Top leading Nazis, studied Satanism in Turkey, mentored in Satanism by Satanic Donmeh Jews [ redundancy] in Turkey. What do you think about Donmeh Jews conjuring-up, promoting + promulgating Satanic “Aryan/Nazism religions”

Welcome to Majority Rights, Lipshitz, now I can ask a really really learned & erudite Jew all the things I was always curious about. I tried asking Hymie in Afula but he’s too busy banging/ race-mixing his “Asian hottie” to be bothered. What a shame, what a sin.


Posted by Joe on Wed, 10 Apr 2013 03:15 | #

@ Rabbi Lipshitz

If VNN is all about White non-Jewish people, why did I—a non-Jew, and also a Christian
[ a ‘Sun’ reader]—why did I get booted-off VNN, while Alex Linder lets you—a Jew of all things—contribute?

I thought VNN was all about “No Jews Just Right”. What happened to that common-sense policy? Did Linder fall-to-pieces-for-you-Jews also ? Like “our” Congress falls to pieces ?

What do you think about the sin the Nazi-Hyperborean-Nazi de Nugent and the jew-Nazi-jew Kaminski are committing by being Fuck Buddies?


Posted by Joe on Wed, 10 Apr 2013 04:45 | #

@ Rabbi Lipshitz

I’m wondering if you studied with Rabbi Jonathan Sacks? Sacks teaches :
” Jewish People Their Own God ” :


There’s another extremely informative, truthful, and fact-filled article at “Kev Boyle” about :

“Human Gas Chambers and The Church of Satan”.

I was just wondering if Rabbi Jonathan Sacks mentored you in your     Talmudic* /Kaballah*/Sufism*/Zionism*-Nazism* studies ?

* redundancies


Posted by Joe on Wed, 10 Apr 2013 05:17 | #

@ Rabbi Lipshitz

If the Jews are so upset about The Holocaust and what happened in Nazi Germany in general, why did the Jews elect Menachem Begin to be Prime Minister of Israel? :

Excellent Search Terms :

        ” Menachem Begin + Nazi Collaborator”

        ” Menachem Begin + Nazi Collaborator + Stern Gang”

        ” Menachem Begin Former Prime Minister of Israel + Nazi”

I’ve never been to a Holocaust Museum. Do the Jews curators ever mention anything about the huge numbers of Jews who Served in the Third Reich Party/Military, including the Jews in the SS ? Do the Jew curators mention anything about how many Jews—and how many Catholics—in addition to being killed by Jew-Zionist Nazis, many were also murdered by Hitler’s Islamic jihadist warriors?

  ” Hitler’s Muslim Legions “

Why would the Jews elect a Nazi to be Prime Minister of Israel? Either the Jews are very stupid :
Well, perhaps, the Israeli IQ test-score results are nothing to brag about, that’s for sure. Something about the “Flynn Effect” ;

Or, the Jews are Not really as upset about the Holocaust as they claim?

Which is it, Rabbi?


Posted by Joe on Wed, 10 Apr 2013 15:27 | #

This is why the Chinese look down at the sub-continent of India ;

Check out the photos of hindoos India :


Scroll down to March 16, 2013 article ” Camp of Saints”
[ “Tourist photos of India”]

Savitri Devi —” Hitler’s Priestess pdf ”—was a hindoo.

I see the pictures of Hinduism-in-action in the real world, and I just don’t think it’s an intelligent way to live. I’m sure there are perhaps some somewhat intelligent white “pagans” around somewhere perhaps—and I don’t really want to hurt the feelings of the white “pagans”* , no sirre ; Well, the “new-age” hindoo way of doing things is not too smart, like not too bright white “pagan” dudes.

The Nazi-Hindoo Savitri Devi was a “New Age” hindoo :

“Savitri Devi + Satanism”

Check out the photos of hindoo India : It’s what the ” enlightened “New Age” Nazi-Aryan-Savitri Devi , so full of “love” and “devotion” to Our White Race, wanted for Europe and the West.

* No old, tired, lame, played-out “new-age” hippies were harmed in writing this post.

@ Rabbi Lipshitz

Aren’t hindoo-nazi-new-age-nazis a hoot ?

I hope you’re keeping THE 14 WORDS in mind, your Rabbinicalness, as you read the HONEST Jewish Dietrich Bronder’s erudite and scholarly work about the Huge and Immense role Jews played in creating and building Anti-Semitic Nazi Germany in the Very First Place :

” Dietrich Bronder + Bevor Hitler Kam pdf “

Or, for a more “goyish” look into the matter :

” Anthony C Sutton + Wall Street and the Rise of Hitler pdf “

” Guido Preparata + Conjuring Hitler pdf ”

REMEMBER THE 14 WORDS, Rabbi Lipshitz. Don’t Ever Forget THE 14 WORDS :

“Jew Wall Street And Jew Farben-Cartel Put The Donmeh Jew Hitler Into Power”





Posted by Thorn on Sat, 20 Apr 2013 22:49 | #

This is good!  H/T to the White Rabbit.

Compare this:

Barbara Lerner Spectre and jewish implementation of multiracial multiculturalism


with this:

AntiRacist Hitler (WhiteRabbitRadioTV)



Posted by Thorn on Sat, 20 Apr 2013 22:51 | #

This is good!  H/T to the White Rabbit.

Compare this:

Barbara Lerner Spectre and jewish implementation of multiracial multiculturalism


with this:

AntiRacist Hitler (WhiteRabbitRadioTV)



Posted by agsfjgk on Fri, 26 Apr 2013 18:47 | #

you fucking prick, fuck the nazis, you stupid shit.


Posted by truthseeker on Sun, 12 May 2013 01:50 | #

from Janie:

“I’ll bet you didn’t know that post-war 15 million Germans were ethnically cleansed from eastern Europe with 2-3 million of them dying as a result.  I’ll bet you didn’t know that the Jews were the driving force behind the Bolshevik revolution, that Jews dreamed up and ran the gulag system and that a Jew, Lazar Kaganovitch, along with his predominantly Jewish thugs presided over the intentional starvation of 7 million Ukrainians in the 1930’s. 

The Holohoax is a filthy lie that is not supported by any official German documents (as the outrages of the Judeo-Bolsheviks are supported by reams of original Soviet documents) or any scientific evidence.  There were no ‘gas chambers’ used to exterminate millions of Jews.”

So true, and this is not all there is to it!
Before both WW’s hundreds of thousands of Germans where beeing killed in Polish concentration camps. Thats were the pictures come from. These were not created by Hitler!! Chimneys of “cremation” centers where built in Germany AFTER the war to make you believe this biggest lie.
It was just another excuse to invade and install capitalist systems in Europe, which Hitler tried to rightfully exclude of his country for many years.
Therefore the people of Germany where boycotted and starved by all Jewish organisations because Hitler refused cooperation (rings a bell? Saddam, Gadaffi,...) to install capitalism.
What would you do as a leader? Defend or suck it up and let intrest rates and national debt take over your country?
Propaganda has made him look bad, and the guys leading your country right now are a hundred times worse.
Look at Iraq and WMD’s? NONE are found. Look at every other war the jews get into, you are given (FALSE!) reasons to invade a country that has much better intentions than the attacker! Open your eyes! Do it for humanity!
All the country’s they invade are countries unwilling to install capitalism and so become vulnerable to the Jewish banking organisations hungry for power!

For example, look for the lists showing current wars, then compare them to country’s that dont have capitalistic systems installed, a whole new understanding of your leader will be found. And by the way, something they will never ever show you on TV.

Give me one speech of Hitler declaring war to any allied country? It does not exist!!!!
give me a speech of an allied country declaring war, these I can find a lot.

Instead of watching TV and believe everything that is fed to you, , do some research of your own, people, please!! Instead of listening to this out of context bs, start LOOKING for yourself!

Give me an official german document ordering the Holocaust. Again, it does not exist! (dont include the badly written, fake documents that would be laughed out of court today because of badly written German grammar, obviously written by english speaking persons with so many faults)

Instead of doing own research and SEE the proof, most of you SHEEP believe everything told to you, unwillingly, you are helping to ruin the world with your completely wrong beliefs and truths!!!
I dare you to look this up and prove me wrong instead.

Until then I still believe our situation now is 10000 times worse under the capitalists then it would have been under Hitler. Unless you like slavery…
And thats for sure! Most of you have no idea what you are talking about.


Posted by Raul Oancea on Wed, 05 Jun 2013 19:57 | #

Guys Uncle “Alf” was a bad(good)guy was the only man perhaps who understood the connection between Divinity and Nature"In the great struggle world has rised,in the great peace mankind will perish”.Hitler understood that the human as a being is a “warrior”,who always seek a mission or a plan to do something a purpose reason.He was good in his way,but was not understood and he is not even now,perhaps one day you will understand why he did what he did,one thing is obviously he was not an ignorant,he was a selfless being(With Germans and White Nations)most of his life are just lies,only to demonize him,HE WAS A GREAT LEADER!And it will never born someone like him with his perspectives and visions and ideas about life.(In that time the racism was necesarry)Do not forget!


Posted by hitler the demon on Mon, 01 Jul 2013 12:03 | #

some people say that he hated jews because they were responsible for the death of christ


Posted by Andrea Fletcher on Mon, 29 Jul 2013 11:07 | #

  I think the world is finally starting to see what a cancer to humanity this international cartel of Jewish Banker is. Not every Jew should be considered or lumped in with these despicable parasites, I certainly hope that righteous Jews like Norman Fincklestien and Noam Chompski are protected from any second Holocaust. The handful of Jewish families who control the current monetary system and media complex are the only Jews we should be rounding up for the gas chamber.


Posted by TheGrandChessboard on Thu, 08 Aug 2013 16:06 | #

There is a reason the Jews have been kicked out of 93 countries over the years. There is a reason the jews are hated time and time again.

the Jewish Bolshevik killed 10 million Ukrainians, these same jews complain about the “holocaust”, these same jews put up museums in every country to remind there host population about there “suffering”, these same jews make movie after movie about “there suffering”. These same jews that have been complaining about for the past 65+ years while they have been simultaneously doing the same thing to the Palestinians. Now these same jews are pointing there nukes not at there enemies in the middle east they are pointing them at european capitals.


Posted by Dr Arslan Rahat Ullah on Wed, 11 Sep 2013 19:53 | #

A very good effort for the layman. The views expressed by the author are very reasonable and makes sense. In my view, it would never help anyone if one starts resorting to racist ideologies and wider conspiracy theories. We so often come across both good and unreasonable individuals with in one household. How can one generalize such wide-ranging traits for a whole population or ethnicity. Killing 3 million Jews is as bad as slaughtering 9.3 million ethnic Germans. Humans need to concentrate on bigger goals and issues. And by the way, who decides where one is to be born. It could be in the hut of an Arab nomad or the palace of a Manhattan Jew!

Really appreciate the effort. Many Thanks


Posted by vlad on Tue, 17 Sep 2013 20:54 | #

hitler was a prophet he could see the future,look what jews have done to America and Europe,they have flooded them with non whites,a tiny percentage of jews have 90% of the worlds money,they are manipulating assholes who are making us fight their wars.through deception though shalt wage war.that’s a jewish motto,but hitler was trying to help,imagine the world today if hitler would have won,paradise pure paradise free from the scheming and manipulating of the Zionist swine.america are idiots they have it all wrong they celebrate diversity the very thing that is destroying our religions traditions and culture,while all of our congress are mostly jews rahm emmanuele,bloomburg just a couple off the top of my head.jews dominate our supreme court.jews run the media,hollywood diamond industry,porn industry,music industry,the NFL,the fashion industry,politics,our colleges,stock market,banks,NBA….that’s a lot of money,these were all things that americans used to run,they are a creeping death never before in the history of man has there been a greater more destructive pest than the jew.go to a Hasidic neighborhood and see how you’re treated,you’ll be saying to yourself at the end of the day..“ya know,maybe that hitler guy wasn’t so bad after all.“he tried to save our ass from all this diversitybullshit,another jew invention,the word racism invented by a jew,the jews knew about 911,they had infiltrated al queda and knew of the coming attack onWTC,but they also saw an opportunity to make billions of dollars,and let 4000,americans die in order to make huge profits in the stockmarket.jews have a long history of terrorism against America,in the 50’s they torpedoed napalmed an American frigget after waiting for everyone to escape in liferafts those who weren’t dead,and them machine gunned the survivors,the ship was clearly marked the jews claimed it wasn’t,they didn’t want America meddling in their conflict with Egypt…but these men had nothing to do with that 37 sailors died 170 injured.their occupation of the west bank has thrown the world into chaos,hitler was the man,he had many talents he wasn’t gay or a Satanist,thats the jews using the media to slander and disgrace his memory,i’m not saying hitler didn’t do some cruel shit but it was necessary to root out the jew.he will be looked on favorably in the future he will become immortal.


Posted by john thames on Mon, 30 Sep 2013 03:43 | #

Tis rather lengthy essay should answer the question.


Sine you now state that you wish to open The Spearhead to a wider variety of subjects than just feminism, I cordially invite you to consider feminism as part of a wider, Jewish assault on western civilization in general and the white male in particular. You have previously rejected such appeals on the grounds that you do not wish to jeopardize the men’s rights movement by associating its good name with “conspiracy nuts” and the lunatic fringe. As a life-long student of the Jewish impress upon the world, I can assure you that I, and many like me, am anything but the lunatics you suppose. My research library consists of hundreds of university level volumes. My opinions are well documented and fully supported by the facts.

Your stated position that feminism as an ideology developed with Abigail Adams and Victorian England is, quite simply, nonsense. One could logically argue that feminism originated in ancient Sparta or imperial Rome, where there also existed strong feminist movements. Feminism, as an organized movement in American life began in the late 1950’s/early 1960’s under provably Jewish auspices. This is indisputable. Betty Friedan/Goldstein, the author of “The Feminist Mystique” in 1963, was provably a closet Jewish Communist. Her membership in the Congress of American Women (C.O.W.) and the United Electrical, Radio and Machinists Union, two of the chief Communist unions of the time, are documented conclusively. Her colleagues from that time to present have been overwhelmingly Jewish. Bella Abzug, Gloria Steinem, Germaine Greer, Linda Ellerbee, Gloria Allred, Erica Jong, Barbara Boxer, Dianne Feinstein, Ruth Bader Ginsberg, Elena Kagan, Shulamith Firestone, Andrea Dworkin, Naomi Klein, Naomi Wolf, Robin Morgan and hundreds of others are equally, and almost exclusively, Jewish. One notable example was the recently deceased Helen Gurley Brown, the red haired Khazar who wrote “Sex and the Single Girl” during the Sexual Revolution of the 1960’s. When the Bolshevik Revolution erupted in Russia in 1917, the Communist regime immediately set about “liberating” women from the home. Equal rights for women in the workplace and guaranteed maternity leave to reproduce on the factory’s time were Communist doctrine from inception. These concepts were embedded in Joseph Stalin’s Soviet Constitution of 1936 and have remained unchanged to this day.

No one in his right mind would claim that everything that happens in the world is the product of a Jewish conspiracy. But to deny that Jews exercise enormous power in politics or that they have profoundly influenced the course of world events is equally absurd. One very simple example of such influence was the Dutch war of 1899-1902 in South Africa. It was precisely Jewish financiers operating behind British imperialism who generated the war. Barney Barnato, the Jewish friend of Cecil Rhodes, Ernest Oppenheimer, Samuel Montagu, Lionel Philips and Werner and Beit, were some of the principal Jewish money men who used British blood to establish the vast diamond and dynamite monopolies that rule the country.

Another excellent example of major Jewish influence in world politics is the great Communist revolution in Russia. That revolution and three decades of Communism after it were entirely Jewish instigated. Winston Churchill wrote that Communism was a Jewish creation – and that the solution to Communism was to promise the Jews a “national home” in Palestine to discourage their revolutionary activities in Europe. A real or purported “contract with Jewry” was made by the British Empire to get the United States into the Great War in exchange for the Promised Land of Palestine being given to the Jews. After the First World War Jewish delegations traveled to the Paris Peace Conference. There they translated the promise of a “national home” into the British mandate over Palestine. The Jews demanded and received “minorities treaties” in all the states of Eastern Europe to protect the Jewish “nation within the nation”. A particularly good source on these facts is the book by Mark Levene “Jews, War and the New Europe”. The famous political commentator of the late nineteenth and early twentieth centuries, Emille Joseph Dillon, in his book, “The Inside Story of the Peace Conference” made the following remarkable statements:

“(The delegates) feared that a religious – some would call it a racial bias – lay at the root of Mr. Wilson’s policy. It may seem amazing to some readers but it is none the less a fact that a considerable number of delegates believed that the real influence behind the Anglo-Saxon peoples were Semitic.”

“The formula (of Mr. Wilson) was this: ‘Henceforth, the world will be governed by the Anglo-Saxon peoples who, in turn, are swayed by their Jewish elements.”

In Bolshevik Russia Jews dominated the commissariats at all levels. In Germany, Hungary and Argentina Communist putsches were attempted. All were heavily Jewish dominated. In Hungary, 160 out of 200 commissars were Jewish. In Argentina, all fourteen top Communist leaders were émigré Russian Jews. Both the British Foreign Office and the American State Department were full of position papers blaming Jews for Communism. Many influential people and middle classes all over the world identified Jews with Communism long before Adolf Hitler proclaimed to the world.

William F. Price obviously believes the Jewish persecution myth. He thinks that because Jews were supposedly persecuted in Czarist Russia that this explains any arguable Jewish sympathy for Communism. He is unaware that the British and diplomatic personnel in Russia made their own on the scene investigations of the pogroms in Russia and came up with conclusions markedly different than those made by the Jewish owned London Telegraph. After interviewing local rabbis and Jews the English officials concluded that over 80% of the destruction and death reported by the Telegraph and the Russian Jewish Committee in London (the RJC) were fabrications. In particular, the English consuls found that the claims of mass rapes and women with their breasts cut off were politically motivated lies to inflame English opinion. The meticulously documented reports of the consuls were ignored and pure propaganda became firmly establishes historical “fact”.

Now that we have established that the Jews do, indeed, exercise real power in the real world, we ask the indelicate question: Do Jews have an agenda for tearing down white societies all over the globe? Everyone on The Spearhead has undoubtedly read or heard Barbara Lerner Spectre’s statement that Jews will spark resentment because of their leading role in promoting multi-culturalism. But no sane individual would wish to rest his case on the say-so of Miss Spectre. Is there more substantial evidence that Jews are the driving force attacking white racial homogeneity? There most certainly is. If one goes back to the debates on the McCarron bill of 1951-1952 which preserved the “national origins” quotas established by the 1924 Immigration law, one discovers that only organized Jewish groups wished to change the “national quotas” from Western Europe system. It was the American Jewish Committee (or AJC), in particular, which filed “friend of the court” (amicus curiae) briefs consistently with the courts trying to overthrow segregation laws. No one else in those times, not big business or corporate America, was making such efforts. If one examines similar efforts all over the world, they are also under the exclusive control of one tribe. It was the Board of Deputies of British Jews who were responsible for getting the Race Relations Act of 1965 passed. That act, as in the early Soviet law of Bolshevik Russia, made the promotion of “race hatred” (especially “anti-Semitism”) a criminal offense. In South Africa race discrimination was a favorite target of the Jewish dominated South African Communist Party. In the United States, it has been the Anti-Defamation League and hordes of Jewish lawyers who have attacked discrimination and whites at every opportunity.

Clearly, there is a Jewish agenda behind racial equality. Indeed, more than a few Jews, like Miss Spectre, have been more than candid about it. But she is not the only one. Henry Feingold has proclaimed that the more diverse a society is, the safer Jews are. Earl Raab of Brandeis University has stated that non-white immigration to the United States has now reached the point where a ”white nationalist, Nazi style reaction to overthrow Jewish power is now impossible”.

Thus, we come to the real question. Is feminism, like Communism and racial equality, a Jewish stratagem for overthrowing the white social structure and tearing down the white family? The answer is unequivocally: Yes. As previously noted, reading a list of Jewish feminists is like reading a list of Jewish commissars in the year 1919. The media that promote feminism are almost entirely Jewish controlled. They constantly promote the myth of the superwoman in one Hollywood action flick after another. They portray men as idiots or dolts. But interestingly, these Jewish media moguls do not publicize inconvenient facts about the treatment of women in Israel. They do not talk about how women (until recently) were banned from praying at the Wailing Wall or forced to ride at the back of the bus. They do not suggest that women should have to apply to a State Board for permission to have an abortion, as in Israel, or that a wife must have her husband’s permission to get a divorce. Still less do they suggest that a bastard, or mamzerim, should only be allowed to marry another mamzerim. The centuries old Judaic practice that only men qualify for a quorum is also never mentioned.

Strict logic would suggest that if Jews are practicing blatant sexism in Israel while tearing down “sexism” of white countries they must have an agenda at work. It is the same logic as Jews tearing down white racial homogeneity all over the world while trampling on Arabs in Palestine. But there are even more conclusive proofs of what feminism really is. They are the Talmudic scriptures and the Nazi “gas chamber” hoax. The Babylonian Talmud teaches that only Jews are human and that non-Jews, the gentiles, exist only to be enslaved or exterminated. As one enlightened rabbi put it, gentiles have human faces only to make them less objectionable to Jews. The Talmud also teaches that the birth rate of the gentiles must be reduced; hence, the Jewish inspired drive for legalized abortion all over the globe. The Mishnah and Gem Mara also teach that the unborn child does not acquire nefesh or human status, until it exits the mother’s body. The woman has the right to expel, or murder, the fetus, if it is causing her “emotional harm”.

The Nazi “gas chamber” hoax is, of course, the conclusive proof that the Protocols of Zion are true. No German record speaks of an extermination of the Jews. The intent rather was to deport them from Europe, first to the French controlled island of Madagascar before the war, and then to the occupied territories in the east after the invasion of Russia. The famous Auschwitz camp in Poland, where the Germans supposedly exterminated four million Jews, was a gigantic industrial production center for the German war effort, consisting of 38 satellite camps. In 1942 during the summer months, the camp was shut down by a typhus epidemic. Typhus is carried by lice. The Germans also deloused the camps with Zyklon B to control the typhus epidemics. The crematory ovens were built to burn the diseased bodies. Their actual disposal rate was consistent with the 150,000 deaths recorded in the camps by the German death books. Many of the Jews who entered the camps were quite ill. This is why the Germans built extensive hospital facilities in the camps to rehabilitate the Jews so they could be put back to work. The camp records disclose, among other things, that thousands of perfectly healthy Jewish babies were born at the camp, surely a remarkable feature of a so-called “extermination camp”. Forensic tests by several qualified scientists (including an investigation by the Forensic Institute at Cracow) have demonstrated virtually no hydrogen cyanide residue in the rooms where the Germans were allegedly “gassing” millions. The so-called gassing chambers are not properly sealed, heated or ventilated to make for proper dispersal of gas. In short, the forensic tests are consistent with what the suppressed German records reveal. 

Many Jews were, however, shot by the Germans on the eastern front. But close to two million Jews had been removed into the interior of the Jewish Communist Soviet Union both before and during the German advance. This happened in both September 1939 during the invasion of Poland and in 1941 during Operation Barbarossa. These Jews were employed in the Soviet arms factories behind the Ural Mountains. After the war, these Jews flooded into the Iron Curtain countries to become leading commissars in Eastern Europe. They also descended through the Balkans in the hundreds of thousands to invade Arab Palestine. The true number of Jewish deaths in World War Two was somewhere between one to two and one half million, depending on the number shot or killed in Russia.

What is the significance of these facts for feminism? The significance is as follows: The Jews who created the “gas chamber” hoax are the same Jews who:

1-Created feminism;

2- Created racial equality;

3- Created Communism;

4-Created open borders, diversity and One World.

“False in one thing; false in all things.”

This essay has been most uncompromising. It was not written to sugar coat the truth or to make the historically illiterate or the brainwashed and ignorant feel better. It will, quite possibly, infuriate the allegedly enlightened William F. Price. I quite understand, and even sympathize with, his position that he does not want to compromise the men’s rights movement by associating it with shockingly subversive ideas. But if he really wants truly open debate on essential facts, I challenge him to publish this essay as a “Guest Contribution”. I promise him that it will open more eyes on more subjects and generate more uncontrollable debate than any other essay he will ever publish.

“John Thames”





Posted by rick1guitar on Sun, 06 Oct 2013 21:00 | #

Or could it possibly be that hitler just like the czar of russia and so many others that had pograms actually saw how the jews in general were. I will say that of all the jews I have met have been extremely nice to converse with yet they had shady buisness dealings. to say someone is racist because of color is to imply that they are also stupid. the said race never bears any responsibility as to why no one likes them. I know plenty of intelligent racist who claim a dislike against american blacks but I have yet to hear “different”  or skin color as the reason. most of the time it is because they jump line at amusement parks,walk slowly across the street when they don’t have right of way,target whites in robberies and show a general lack of respect for others ,yet if you dislike that then you are a racist. the jews have been kicked out of over a hundred countries and blacks have a racial slur in almost every language yet its never their fault or doing.  hypothetical question- If a man has been married five different times,Is it the fault of the wives for the divorce?


Posted by Molly on Mon, 14 Oct 2013 21:39 | #

this helped mi in no way! im doing a report on the holocaust, and i need a date published, a date it was updated if updated, and who made it. give me some help people!


Posted by free2bme on Sat, 19 Oct 2013 07:49 | #

Oh Hitler was right about everything. Look at who rules our finances and in turn our government, our news our newspapers and in turn our attitudes our emotions our reactions, our hostility, and in turn our society. I read something about Henry Ford and Hitler. Mind you, Ford was a Jew, and yet approached Hitler as his unbreakable rise was apparent, and depending on what you believe, offered support and or assistance and came up with the nazi slogan name, but it was longer, so Hitler shortened it. What history wants us to believe is that Hitler hated all Jewish people, but if you read it all his main word was Jewry. Liars who do whatever it takes control others with “money” and think they are more educated and above in all ways better than anyone stupid Christians. They deceive, steal, control, befriend and as I recently found, “Assimilate” in hopes to take over and rule the world. So far they are succeeding, being we are so obsessed with money, materialism, ego and power. I say we get rid of money as it stands, and ignore the “Federal Reserve” and all it’s associations, and instead, realize what they are up to and wanting, and refuse them the contentment of taking over yet another country. Oh how wonderful a day it will be when they know that have no affect on our actions or rise and ability to move forward without war, or dependence on their imaginary money, and despite all their efforts to deceive in order to destroy, only destroyed and revealed our true wisdom, which is from God, not from their books. How do you kill Jewry? Realize that money is a hoax, and people loving people overcomes any obstacle money can, and any man who loves money over life and integrity and truth is to be left to love his money, and never experience the love of Jesus. :D


Posted by SomeIndian on Thu, 24 Oct 2013 19:35 | #

This is my own theory on Jews. i know it’s 100% true because we have the same class of people here in India and lots of similarities.

There is just one thing to learn about Jews - they know how to overclock their brains through dietary and lifestyle adjustments (Kosher, Wearing skull caps, reciting prayers, rituals/fasts, Learning Music, avoiding manual labor [manual labor reduces intelligence by redirecting nutrients to the muscles instead of sending to the brain], getting up early, avoiding bad habits, leading a disciplined life etc.). This helps them to achieve a higher mental capacity - they elevate their minds to a state of controlled hypomania.

You can never beat anyone who’s a hypo-manic - NEVER. They are 200% intelligent, 10 times quicker, have high self esteem, are fast talking, charismatic, lack fear, efficient like hell and solve problems like nobody does, are very pushy and very aggressive. Now you will say YES RIGHT -  that’s what Jews are like. This hypomanic edge takes Jews miles ahead of ordinary mortals (read Gentiles). Jews are like Formula One cars, we are like ordinary ones.

Anyone with these traits will be top of their profession or field. This ability to jack up mental capacity makes Jews what they are today.

Why the world hates them? Because they are the masters - they own everything, they have power, money and what not. We are just the losers who work for them. And losers always hate the winners especially when you don’t get a fair deal.

Jews are not the only one’s who know this secret, in India we have the priestly class - Brahmins and the merchant class who make lifestyle adjustments and attain controlled hypomanic state of mind. They are equally hated here as well - people call them the Jews of India (ask any Indian) In all probability you can see this phenomenon in lot of societies.

Every Jewish kid knows the answer to this question - “Why Hitler hated Jews” - BUT THEY NEVER TELL YOU!!!

Well, hating Jews is not going to help anyone, it will only give you heartburn. If you can’t beat them, don’t join them, just copy them….make those life style adjustments…you can be an Einstein too!!






Posted by I could be bored to death on Sun, 27 Oct 2013 09:40 | #

What a load of crap. Perhaps all these ignorant holocaust deniers need a good cold dose of reality. The holocaust happened, millions died, Germany started WW II, there is plenty of evidence, written and visual, and the whole world suffered. Go crawl back into your holes and chew off your own feet.


Posted by You disgust me on Sun, 27 Oct 2013 10:20 | #

Examine yourselves and ask the question…am I human?


Posted by SomeIndian on Mon, 28 Oct 2013 21:52 | #

See the Jew got up at 4:40 am…and he can’t write much because he’s busted. Nowhere i have said that the Holocaust didn’t happen. Hitler was a nutcase who ‘lost it’ and decided to burn ‘em up because of pure hatred and jealousy. I’m not here to write about how good or bad Jews are. The fundamental thing in this world is the right to life and to have all the rights of a Human being, no matter how good or bad one is. Hitler didn’t respect that , so he perished.

Man you gotta experience hypomania to understand its power. I successfully triggered a month long episode after forcing myself to have very little sleep. That one month, I was a road roller doing formula one speed, full of ideas, double the IQ, charismatic, pushy, very aggressive and intense. That’s where it hit me - that these people are permanent hypomanics - somehow they trigger it and hold it lifelong.

There are people writing books on how the greatest business families are bipolar and hypomanic in America (read THE HYPOMANIC EDGE by John D Gartner). Jonh D Gartner argues that hypomania is inherited. But believe me, these people know the secrets to trigger and keep it under control (Hypomania can turn into Mania where one looses control and behaves like a mad person).




Posted by John Marino on Tue, 29 Oct 2013 12:03 | #

I like Hitler!  He had a bunch of great ideas.  I was told he invented Taco Bell and the Churro.  I love Taco Bell and Churros so Hitler is ok with me.


Posted by rudy on Wed, 06 Nov 2013 03:01 | #

During the latter stages of WWI Hitler was gassed and sent behind the line to recover. During his convalexcense he read the German Newspapers continuously which were owned by the Jews. They were all against the War as it was going on as Germans were dying by the thousands; the negativism struck a chord with him for whatever reason. His hatred was permeated right there.


Posted by Otto on Thu, 07 Nov 2013 17:34 | #

There will never be a safe place for Jews, or any other minority who is influential (often for the good, sometimes for the bad like hiperarticulate social criticism that undermines the local tribe self belief),  with social or relig   ious   beliefs quite different from the local tribe and who feels allegiance to a foreign country.

History shows since Moses Jews will be sooner or later persecuted, often with unimaginable violence.

Jews wrongly seem to believe that Israel and great activity to discredit the nazis and antisemitism in general will protect them. It is irrational to believe somehow Jews through the Holocaust have found the way.

In fact, any person can see right now in the US, millions of Americans, perhaps a silent majority (impossible to know even in secret polling because the Jews have succeeded in making most Americans feel guilty about the Jews but anyone knows guilt and anger are very close and one can quickly turn into the other) are indifferent or hostile to Jews.

Jews mistake what appear to be their friends for true friends. All those polititicians such as Romney and Obama only pretend they are friends of Israel because they feel they need the influential Jewish support, that is all.

Jews are not safe in the US because it is not rational to believe 2% of the population can forever prevail over the majority. This is why Jews always end up at the losing end.

Jews are not very skilled at being truly accepted as history shows. Even if it is correct antisemites are irrational, amoral, almost subhuman, it is a dumb idea to use as defense strategy “antisemites are wrong, we are right” if that strategy leads over and over to the same results; antisemitism happens over and over and Jews are expelled, murdeted, discriminated, etc.

For Jews to be safe they must not exceed perhaps 0.2% of the population or whatever is the level to ensure the community does not achieve much influence as such.
Since in the US the figure is ten times higher we will have big antisemitic action in the US. Steadily the conditions are converging for mass antisimitism; lots of Jewish influence (paradoxically), and steadily deteriorating moral and economic conditions of the middle class which sooner or later will turn into antisemitism. More and more Americans see how the country is full of bright creative people, many Jews, yet the country is fast deteriorating, much like pre nazi Germany.

Jews are not safe in Israel either because as soon as antisemitism turns the US away from supporting Israel, Israel will last 5 minutes blowing up in some thermonuclear or bioweapon Massada.

Jews must realize they are extremely stupid at being accepted. They have been unable to hold.onto their own country, they have it now as a result of antisemitism not by free own initiative, they are unable to find a way to be truly accepted by non Jews. As long as Jews do not figure a better way to live among non Jews, what started with the Faraoh will continue over and over to the end of time. It is a tribal thing on both sides, it goes beyond morals, it is for the same reason lions protect their territories from other lions. It is a tribe survival thing.

It seems to me it is in the Jewish script to accomplish and to suffer and Jews need non Jews to show their accomplishments are of universal value and to suffer and, somehow, to me in a non healthy way, show the moral superiority.of the victim. To me one of the first moral duties is to do all you can to avoid being a victim. Unfortunayely, Jews, over and over, put themselves in situations where they will be victims. Even right now, the way Israel behaves towards the Palestinians, Arabs and even the US is suicidal; it makes no sense to depend on US support for its survival and on nuclear weapons for obvious reasons. Yet Israelis always manage to keep the irrational often but deadly rage of the Moslems, or others, going.

By the way, make no mistake Germans do not want the Jews   back, never mind all the monetary atonement of the German government. “we prefer to pay to keep the Jews away”. Besides, the Germans have shown what they are capable of if they feel desperate enough. By the way, all Americans of European origin, including Brittish, come from countries with “rich” anti Jewish histories. As for American Blacls and Hispanics, fondness for the Jews is not a strong point…

Finally, while it is obvious tlere are many smart jewish individuals i believe it is due to two factors; high motivation to succeed (nothing wrong with that) and not belonging to the host society, this detachment allows jews to look a things in a new way, sometimes for the good (physics) or for the bad (marxism or multiculturalism that destroys the identity of people and country (this is why Israel is not a multicultural society, it is a jewish society that tolerates others and not the multiculture the promote for other countries)

Furthermore, collectively, as a culture, jewish accomplisments do not come even close to the accomplisments of other cultures; sumerians, ancient chinese, ancient greeks, romans, indians, arabs, japanese and, above all, anglo euopeans after the renaissance.

While there have been bright jews in other cultures, as a people by themselves, to me their accomplisments are not impressive.

Yes the jewish god has been successful in terms of adherents but not in terms of human progress and dignity.

It was non jews who invented numbers and math, geometry, physics, biology, medicine, the alphabet, literature, electricity, nuclear energy, movies, airplanes, radio, transistors, lasers, rockets, medicine, democracy, printing, the compass, radar and on and on.

without the jewish god ancient greeks, romans chinese and others accomplished far more and far more than ancient israel. Jews have never able to lift a cuntry or society out of its backwardness.

Essentially all jewish achievements happen within societies created by non jews.

In fact right now israel is way behind the more advanced countries of the world in all significant indicators; income, quality of life, education, democracy, social peace, even in science and technology in spite of all the us and european educated jews and all the monetay and tecnological help from the us.

In fact, were it not for the euro-american educated jews and the non jewish american and european societes israel would have not have been created or overrun by the arabs.

for all their efforts all jews have managed after the holocaust is to, again, place themselves at the will of non jews. The moment us society turns on jews or weakens itself further (as it seems going that way), american jews will be on the run and israel will evaporate in an arab-triggered nuclear massada.

But jews, so clever are also so irrational…


Posted by Patrick G on Sun, 22 Dec 2013 05:54 | #

Several writers make reference to the large numbers of Nazi sympathizers, or admirers of Hitler, in the United States.  After 60 years living in America I have never met a Nazi or one of their friends.  I’ve met a varied collection lot of people, a number of communists, etc.  How do the Nazis entirely avoid my attention?  Where do these people live?

People write about the white supremacists, the Ku Klux Klan and the Free Masons.  These are said to be diabolical forces in our society.  Somehow I’ve never met one of these.  I believe they must exist if only because we have a population of 317 million.  We probably have some cannibals.  I’ll bet the number of cannibals exceeds the number of Nazis or Aryan supremacists.

I’ve known many Jews who are mostly great folks with an occasional rat popping up in about the same percentage as among other races.  In my generation however I find no anti-Semitism.  One reads about the simmering oppression under the surface.  In my life, and in the company of gentiles, I have never witnessed a discussion about Jews controlling the banking system or poisoning the wells.  People don’t even identify Jews in conversations, any more than they would point out that Joe Blow is a Methodist.

Maybe I need to get out more so I can find and do battle with all these dark forces.


Posted by DanielS on Sun, 22 Dec 2013 08:17 | #

Several writers make reference to the large numbers of Nazi sympathizers, or admirers of Hitler, in the United States.  After 60 years living in America I have never met a Nazi or one of their friends.  I’ve met a varied collection lot of people, a number of communists, etc.  How do the Nazis entirely avoid my attention?  Where do these people live?

Patrick G: in the mainstream media and in the mainstream world, for that matter, you may well Not see any genuine neo-Nazis. However, in White Nationalist circles, unfortunately, they abound of late. The fact that WN does not reflect normal White and nationalist thinking with its current exponents is a real problem for its image, credibility and guidance factor.

Let’s drop the over used, over applied term, “neo-Nazi”, and get to the essence of an accurate meaning of the term by focusing on those who do two things: over sympathize with Hitler and co. and say that the Nazis were the “good guys” while the Allies were the “bad guys” in World War II.

Firstly, let me say that the matter of the war is complicated, and most of us viewing it through the Jewish media have been disgusted to see Jewish deaths presented as the only really important deaths of World War II.

Well, with WN media, we are seeing the other extreme, to where only German deaths are seen as important.

Before I name names, I would like to say that in all of these examples, I would like to be allied with these people’s interests but I cannot, because they are, in one way or another, defending, if not outright advocating Hitler’s violent imperialism, which included a violent imperialism against fellow Europeans.

Rodney Martin: American Nationalist Network

Carolyn Yeager and Hadding Scott: The White Network

Total Fascism and Daily Stormer by Andrew Anglin

Yeager and Anglin get good Alexa ratings as does…

Counter-Currents: Greg Johnson said he makes respect for Hitler a litmus test of being given the OK. Matt Parrott wrote an article defending Hitler as a “comrade” not to be left behind.

David Duke (you won’t hear him criticizing Hitler or Nazi Germany as particularly blameworthy for the war)

William Pierce’s legacy (or what’s left of the National Alliance)

The Institute of Historical Revue

Mike Delaney

John Friend’s realist report

Renegade Broadcasting (I hate to say it, but these guys, mostly kids, are stuck a bit stuck on the Hitler thing)

As if we cannot think for ourselves!

Even the Political Cesspool, as it cites Pat Buchanan and the Institute of Historical Revue as definitive on Word War II, go too far in a lack of critical thinking with regard to Hitler.

That is just to name a few, but if you are looking to WN for your news as I like to, then you are seeing almost as much of a Nazi bias in WN media as you are seeing a Jewish bias in mainstream media.

It is very unfortunate, because it could not be more clear that Hitler was not a unifier of European peoples, but an enormously divisive and destructive force - ever so he shall remain.

I don’t wish these WN’s any harm, most are very bright with interesting insights, I just wish that they would come around to a (genuine) view in advocacy of all European peoples (and a wish to preserve their discreet kinds) - that corresponds to a recognition that that is impossible with the endorsement and promotion of Hitler.

We can and should think for ourselves, anew.

Moreover, think how much better a chance a project such as Cobb’s would have had if he had stayed clear of endorsing Nazism. The warrant for denouncing Nazism is strong, even for Whites. Whereas true White nationalism, which is White separatism, is eminently warranted - not that it won’t still be attacked, they may even try to call you “neo Nazi”, but if you truly are not a neo Nazi (which you should not be), it gives you a large rhetorical advantage in gaining support and in resistance to the enemy.


Posted by DanielS on Sun, 22 Dec 2013 09:16 | #

Oh yes, add the restarted ‘Truth Militia’ and John Kaminski to this gaggle ..

(and note Mark Weber as the man behind The IHR)


Posted by MOB on Sun, 22 Dec 2013 10:54 | #

Jews are not “persecuted.”  Jews are retaliated against.  Jews are predators.  They were not shaped into Gentile-hating predators by their vicious Talmud.  Their “holy” writings are Gentile-hating because Jews created them to serve their goals.

Jews hate Gentiles because hate is a necessary and potent fuel; they keep it perpetually stoked up because they exist in a permanent state of war against all Others.  Jews have plans.  Deception is ingrained in all Jews and plays an obvious role in the verbal agility that raises their intelligence quotient.  Jews have plans.

Only a sorely deficient Gentile would be “jealous” of a Jew, and neither Hitler nor the German people in general were deficient.  Long before the largely fictionalized so-called holocaust—the fantasy that keeps multi-millions pouring into the global network of Jewish organizations that serve the interests of Jews and none other in perpetuity—mega-millions more than Bernadette’s apparitions at Lourdes ever garnered for the Catholic Church.

Jews especially hate Germans, from pure and very justified jealousy.  Germany was the land from which came forth the greatest amount of pure beauty in all its many manifestations Jews are incapable of creating Beauty, and because they can’t, they work, fanatically, to destroy it.  Judaizing and uglifying are synonymous.

You may want to partner with Jews.  But I can assure you that Jews don’t want to partner with you.  They want to shit on you (pardon the expression), and then, they want to push you into the sea.


Posted by DanielS on Sun, 22 Dec 2013 11:13 | #

I realize that you were probably not addressing me, but speaking in generalities, when saying “you may not want to partner with them”.

Speaking for myself, I do not want to partner with them.

As for German beauty with regard to the example of women, there are some outstanding examples, of course (I think of Marlene Dietrich and Ilse Hirsch as sterling examples), but the consensus is that they are not necessarily the most beautiful European women as a pattern - with the qualification that who knows what the wars did to their overall pattern of beauty? 

In terms of aesthetics of architecture and other expressions of culture, I would give French and English/Scottish culture an edge over German.

Being proud of German culture, people and accomplishments is fine, perfectly reasonable.

But I am not sure that Germans are disrespected by Jews more than other Europeans; I think rather, there is a kind of intellectual respect. However, the reasons why Jews would be afraid of Germans and defensive against them is only obvious.


Posted by Al Ross on Sat, 28 Dec 2013 12:25 | #

With every comment of yours, DanielS, on the subject of those best of Europeans, viz., the Germans, I hear the pitiable sound of an underdog’s grinding axes.

Few people know more about the Polish - German relationship than the inimitable and irascible Friedrich Braun and I wish that he were here to enlighten us on that subject.


Posted by DanielS on Sat, 28 Dec 2013 13:45 | #

My purpose is not to grind an axe, Al. Nor even to take the side of an underdog particularly. My objective is to coordinate European nationalism so that they function together and not at odds with one another.

Something tells me that I would not find much use in Friedrich Braun.


Posted by gollumum on Mon, 10 Mar 2014 18:58 | #

So it was the entire world? Not anything the Jews had done? The fact this had gone on throughout recorded history was just bad luck for the Jews. If you believe that you deserve to pay twice as much for everything you buy.


Posted by DanielS on Mon, 10 Mar 2014 19:34 | #

Good, then I don’t have to pay twice as much.


Posted by John Budden on Thu, 20 Mar 2014 04:56 | #

Hitler hated all people especially his own race his hatred of jews was just to disguise his hatred for his own race and turn the world against germany which is what he mostly sought to destroy


Posted by dani. on Mon, 14 Apr 2014 01:49 | #

Hitler was pure evil. The holocaust did happen. I am not a Jew. My grandfather survived a war camp in Germany. My father was only a small boy when WW2 ended. Today my children, think this Hitler was some sort of hero, makes me feel ashamed. To say that the holocaust did not happen….is made up…is true bullshit. Young people today, do not understand how horrible World War 1 and World War 2…were. I pray to God, never again…..hating is not right. No matter how smart or intelligent this Hitler dude, was suppose to be, to me he is a monster. I am ashamed to be European….


Posted by DanielS on Mon, 14 Apr 2014 07:20 | #

You are welcome to hate Hitler, dani. It is well warranted. And the way so-called White Nationalists are looking upon him as a hero is beyond insane, it is utterly stupid.

Many prominent White Nationalists have been saying, even recently, that Hitler only had the modest wish to take back lands which were rightfully German, lands that had been “stolen” from them by Versailles.

First of all, of the land no longer under German jurisdiction after Versailles, there was sufficient claim that Germany itself had “stolen” most of this disputed land. More, that the relatively small amount of territory that they had been called upon to concede, in proportion to their still vast territory after WWI, would have been a reasonable concession for peace by reasonable national leaderships and post war terms at the time - as opposed to the reality of the economic terms; and as opposed to the reality of Hitler’s intentions, made abundantly clear now in his “Table Talk”, viz., that he was inspired by Friedrich The “Great’s” eastward imperialism, aims which extended to the Urals! Any Slavic person who didn’t like it and who was in the way, be damned.

So much for Hitler and Nazism representing White Nationalism. He was coming from a perspective of a German military man, a German chauvinist with an exponent. He was a massively violent, genocidal, German imperialist

Even so, we should caution against the “pure” evil attribution, as we might do better than to take Hitler out of context by making him “pure” anything. As such we lose sight of feedback loops by which we can create normal, good relations, as opposed to those that went into creating, through instigation, the vast over-compensations of Hitler and Nazi Germany.

With that, it is important to distinguish Hitler for what he was, a German imperialist, not a White nationalist, let alone a European communitarian - though he played footsie with these ideas, provided his breed, who automatically bark and attack at the sight of a Slavic, could be the dictators of their lot.

We need to defend nationalism and its subcultural divisions against imperialism, including the imperialism of international and globalist interests.


Posted by Devkinandan on Fri, 25 Apr 2014 16:32 | #

The issue is being revived by satanic forces to divert the attention and focus away from a real terrorizing conspiracy to destroy the liberal democratic, secular nations, the action which is currently active globally. Watch the emerging monster and do not chase the shadows of past. Do not indulge in mutual mud slinging. Identify this monster of then and now. It works behind the scene and did work which resulted in WW I and WW II.


Posted by Devkinandan on Fri, 25 Apr 2014 16:59 | #

Strangely no body talks about extermination of Gypsies as if they were not and are not human beings. They quietly embraced death since time immemorial and never made any profit out of their miseries and sufferings. They never asked for pity or tried to evoke compassion from their tormentors. They were meted out injury, violence, violation, expulsion which continues till today in almost all European nations including Britain ( warriors of democracy and freedom of WW-I and WW-II vintage), Romania, France, Poland. Today all European nations are united in their persecution of Gypsy men,women and children.
They even did not and still do not receive redressal of their grievances or justice even from a sham and fake tailor made Kangaroo courts of Nuremberg style drama which was a true reflection of Nazi behaviour and their verdict and justice rather far more repulsive than Nazi holocaust. Justice for Gypsies. They were never blood suckers or cannibals. Nor do they finance vices or hold monopoly in power and politics. There is no answer for that except for usual outburst of condemning them as thieves, calling them dirty etc. Present and past powers in Europe are and were as much guilty in persecuting Gypsies as Nazis, Stalin or Pol-Pot with a facade of liberal democrat ism.


Posted by Devkinandan on Fri, 25 Apr 2014 17:18 | #

Be careful anti Jewish tirade and propaganda is being let loose by terrorists and fundamentalists who want to create conflict and divisions among Jews and Christians so that they can over power the world in future. That is what they did in past and want to repeat it while remaining behind the scenes as usual. Hitler was their creation and supported by them financially and militarily. Before that they had an empire which extended from Europe to Asia and are now in a hurry to dominate the world by all means, bribes, influx, engineering conflicts, influencing youth, students, media, judiciary and any thing which would help their designs. Their great strength is lies, money, determination, disinformation and striking at weak links in liberal democracies.


Posted by cadgbd on Sun, 11 May 2014 04:16 | #

The hatred of Jews and Christians is because of the proscription against homosexuality. The Nazis were homosexual and practiced an ancient Pagan occult religion that included homosexual rituals.

The book, “The Poisoned Stream”, mentions name of a Jew who spoke out against the licentiousness of the time (I do not remember the name and do not have the time now to look).. The book is free here:


More is written in the book “The Pink Swastika”, free here:



Posted by endzog.wordpress on Thu, 29 May 2014 20:56 | #

Hitler was 100% right about the Jews as history is once again proving.


Posted by Lawrence Newman on Sat, 28 Jun 2014 03:38 | #

Nowhere in this blog entry did you actually explain how Hitler was wrong.


Posted by DanielS on Sat, 28 Jun 2014 07:10 | #

In his deliberate elitism (though flamboyantly de-emphasized within the German grouping), master slave outlook, his sscientism (nature’s undeniable way) his imperialism (with petty, pseudo warrant, at that; no normal person believes he only wanted pre-Versailles land back; and if they look into it more deeply, that he was particularly warranted to start such a war even if it were the case that he only wanted that land back), horribly drawn friend enemy distinction, to where Europeans were at cataclysmic, fratricidal war with one another (initiated by Hitler by his own admission), under-emphasis of deportation as opposed to subjugation and killing. etc. etc.


Posted by indo girl on Thu, 10 Jul 2014 17:19 | #

you see what Jews doing in Palestine, maybe that’s why….


Posted by Alexander Simon on Mon, 11 Aug 2014 08:47 | #

August 11, 2014

Vertigo Records
364-366 Kensington High Street
London W14 8NS
United Kingdom, England

Phone: +44 (0)207 471 5400
Fax: +44 (0)207 471 5476


I am a writer who cans sing in early voice of many languages.  I find this band electric and razor!  England’s newest hot and electric fire dazzle Black Sabbath returned to the studio to begin work on their third album. Following the chart success of Paranoid, the band were afforded more studio time from touring and smiled drinking red Hungarian wine.

The most investing a name rare John Michael “Ozzy” Osbourne (born 3 December 1948) is an English heavy metal vocalist, songwriter; read a dark idea.  According to Harper & Row Publishers Incorporated; Professor of English Samuel Ian Hayakawa met a Professor James Bryce McMillan; and here is their definition; Black is forbidding and unyielding + Sabbath; is brunt for a forceful attack of foe against the 10 Commandments; beginning War from Saturday to open the Sabbath or pool of blood; against Tierney. 

“The Band scored well with 9 Gold Albums with members from Hungary! 
The Head delivery of Hard punch all English moving hired his best Band Members: 
Tony Iommi and Geezer Butler.  Tony also birthed and Certified Birmingham of England met privately from Scotland Yard and rehearsed after real policing!

During of Hungarian Blood and Irish temperament Black Sabbath is the eponymous debut album by English heavy metal band Black Sabbath. Released on 13 February 1970 in the United Kingdom and on 1 June 1970 in the United States charting to #1 new Band on October 15, 1970!!!

Their theme was anti-Demon or the Lucifer hiding in shame!  “The original title of “War Pigs” was “Walpurgis” is German for “Valborg”; or in plain English “Walpurgis Night”; early!  In strong Hungarian “A Walpurgis-éj; literary means the coming together of light.

By, The New Group”  THE WOLFE PACK
‘The day is burning as doves are learning;
The girl is waiting for a bus returning in Hungary,
Today. Removing man’s mortal soul;
For man is War Machine; cleansing out the scene! ’

Marked the Day of Destruction;
The World will ‘know’ in Christ
The fool; hammering ‘another;’ nail
Of poison dirty tale! yeah!

The Epoch will learn;
War Machines Galore opening Christ’s
Phoney War; rising to the Star;
Hammers end the Messiah yeah!

The Day is Calling;
As more Spartans are wanting;
A nother fool to die, and birds spit in Jesus eye;
Birds of prey struck the Hour,
Pecking out his eye flying to Kingdom neigh;
Spartans burn his clothing;
The fiery Cross is bloody bathed as the Jew Messiah dying;
For sins in Bethlehem against the Council not hiding;
The fool Christ dies in shame yeah.’

By Writer Alexander Simon,
of Edmonton.



Posted by charles allcock on Fri, 19 Sep 2014 20:06 | #

The Jews dominant and favoured position stems from their control of the banks and money supply. From this they can do anything they want. They can buy and control the media, take over any business they wish, buy the best education, and so on and on. And they don’t give a shirt for anyone else.


Posted by MOB on Sat, 20 Sep 2014 23:20 | #

Poor Majority Rights.  It’s attracted trolls who rant red herrings and anti-Hitler zombies whose stupid voice recordings turn themselves on at random.  Does Majority Rights stand for anything?

The Jews can’t stop themselves. They can’t stop taking, taking, taking over.  The only way to survive living with them in your midst is to tune out. I’m a life-long classical music lover. I have had to stop listening to National Public Radio, which owns the only radio stations that still broadcast it.  I’ve had to stop because the Jewishness is pervasive.  Jews can’t create music worth listening to, but they “made it their own,” as they do everything, by taking over every single aspect of playing, directing, producing, training, programming, concertizing—everything—relating to the life of classical music.  They did the same to Art.  “Public” Television is as overwhelmingly Jew-infested as “Public” radio.  There’s nothing “public” about them; they are by, for, and about Jews, day after day; being Jews is the Jews’ only business; everything else is incidental to that.  Jews make life not worth living for Gentiles of quality. 


Posted by jamesUK on Sun, 21 Sep 2014 02:02 | #

What’s happened to John DeNugent? His website has been down for a number of days and seems to no longer exist including his mirror back up sites?


Maybe he was right about the whole Nordic/Grey Alien-Nazi 4th Reich conspiracy and the Men in Black got him.

13) Nordic Aliens have abducted entire White American families and taken them to beautiful planets to work in agriculture and forestry, fearing that earth WILL be destroyed but desiring that White earthlings should be preserved. They are however kept at 1940s technology because Earthlings tend toward ego, violence, and misusing technology to make devastating weapons and, through pollution, to destroy their own environment to get rich quick.

14)  A Gray-Reptilian alliance enslaved many planets with a HAARP-like mind control and neurochemicals, making them into programmed transhumans without free will, slaves and soldiers in their war machine.

The Nordic Aliens were forced to obliterate all life on those many planets and then restore those planets painstakingly so they could again host life.

15) The Nordic Aliens wish the Fourth Reich to take care of the problems on this planet.


If they evil greys have an alliance with the US and the NWO and the Nordics are allied with 4th Reich Nazis and are preparing for a war then we are truly fucked.


Posted by DanielS on Sun, 21 Sep 2014 04:39 | #

“Poor Majority Rights.  It’s attracted trolls who rant red herrings and anti-Hitler zombies whose stupid voice recordings turn themselves on at random.  Does Majority Rights stand for anything?”

Majority Rights is not poor, dear MOB. It is very happy, still shedding former trolls and not yet having gotten its new direction off the ground, though about it.

MR stands for all European peoples and their discreet nations, natives and kinds (innocent until proven guilty, anyway).

It rejects the viewpoint that we ought to include Jews in our interest group. Jews are not included in the classification of our peoples.

In that regard, its provides a platform free of the Jewish affectations of Christianity, rightfully attending to the moral concerns of those who cannot pretend to believe in Christianity, but seek rather a moral order more closely approximating our E.G.I. and reverence inspiring loyalty thereby.

In service of all Europeans and respect for their discreet kinds, it recognizes that Hitler cannot serve as a uniting figure. That he could be is the wishful thinking of some, who will put on blinders and earplugs for that wish, ignoring Hitler’s own words, that he did not respect national boundaries and peoples besides Germans and to a lesser extent Germanics, but would kill them if necessary to take their lands up to the Urals. National boundaries, to Hitler, were merely what the people could and should assert by their will and force. The designs he spoke of repeatedly could not make it more clear that his was no defensive war - he was the imperialist aggressor, by design, against other Europeans - he is clear about that in his words from Mein Kampf to Table Talk; in his actions from taking all of Czechoslovakia after the Sudetenland was conceded, to bombing the cities of nations who could have been his peaceful neighbors and allies in Jewish deportation. But Hitler was a conventional military man with dreams of becoming an even greater Friedrich the Great; that was his world view and his philosophy was all about making excuses for the “necessity” of his militarism - a militarism that did not respect other Europeans, people who fought in defense of their nations just as Germans would; an aggression by Hitler that wound up costing 55 million European lives.

It is only common respect to expect those who wish to point out his reasons, to acknowledge things he did well, to preface talk of him with a caveat as to his epistemological blunders, to acknowledge that his platform was insufficient as a moral order for Europeans to cooperate and rally.

Such is not the case for MR: MR advocates all Europeans and their nationalisms. We include Germans and German nationalism, whereas Hitler and Nazism does not respect other Europeans and their national bounds. Poor Hitler, poor advocates of Hitler, not poor Majority Rights.

We have the moral high ground.


Posted by jamesUK on Sun, 21 Sep 2014 14:46 | #


Well Hitler in his secret foreign policy book discovered and published after the war and according to David Irving speaking to Hitler’s staff and members of the regime after WW2 was pro-British Empire even willing to go against his WW2 allies for a peace treaty with Britain that he envisioned according to his foreign policy book Britain and Germany ruling over Europe. 

Most WN although they may not be Nazis are pro-Hitler/Nazi especially in the US like William Pearce and Don Black that not being pro-Hitler is usually the exception to the rule like Jarod Taylor who is focussed on purely racial issues and trying to gain greater credibility. 

What about the disappearance of John DeNugent and the alien conspiracy?



Posted by DanielS on Sun, 21 Sep 2014 15:16 | #


I hate to say it but you are starting to come across as a trouble-maker.

Who cares about John DeNugent?

Regarding the notion that “most American WN are pro-Hitler”, even if true, that is not necessarily a permanent condition nor is it something to be accepted as a correct position - it is not. Though I am beginning to wonder if you want it to be true in order to make White/European advocacy seem ridiculous.

Nor is MR going the Jared Taylor way. I am not among those who views him with contempt, but his platform is insufficient. By the way, I would add “unamusement park” (1/4 Jewish and it shows in his concerns) to the list of controlled opposition.

It is simply not true that there is no room for other angles than the ones you sketch.

Hitler may have teamed-up with Britain as the islanders are sharing much DNA with Germans, but it goes to a point that I have sought to address - that closer relation does not guarantee cooperation.

I suspect that the Brits had hard feelings still regarding WWI and thought, “oh, not again.”

Not that they did not have strategic objectives along with perhaps less noble motives and foreign infiltrators angling to provoke war, but they probably noted the immorality of Hitler’s position as well.

And when Hitler said NS was not for export, he meant that a decent regard for the whole of his people did not extend to other European, non-Germanics to the east, in particular.


Posted by jamesUK on Mon, 22 Sep 2014 07:24 | #


I hate to say it but you are starting to come across as a trouble-maker.

How so? Is it because of John DeNugent and the alien theory or the WN affection to Hitler and National Socialism?

Just look at Don Blacks Stormfront that proves my point

Who cares about John DeNugent?

He is an important WN leader and one of the longest running who also one of the very few to run for political office in the US.

There was a video series which he covers his political run including news extracts on his site and YouTube before it was taken down by MIB(?). 

Though I am beginning to wonder if you want it to be true in order to make White/European advocacy seem ridiculous.

Lol! I don’t have to that they do it themselves remember The Order, Sikh temple shooting, Kevin Alfred Strom, the Holocaust museum shooting and former Order member Glen Millers jewish shooting?

Wasn’t Don Black and Duke involved with some scandal overseas to help support mercenaries in an African or Caribbean country or something?


Posted by jamesUK on Mon, 22 Sep 2014 07:26 | #

Correction meant to type @DanielS not jamesUK


Posted by DanielS on Mon, 22 Sep 2014 09:14 | #

“Posted by jamesUK on September 22, 2014, 02:24 AM | #


  I hate to say it but you are starting to come across as a trouble-maker.

How so? Is it because of John DeNugent and the alien theory or the WN affection to Hitler and National Socialism?”

It is because you are pestering me - trolling it now seems evident - to discuss these things as if they are a necessary corollary to the advocacy of European peoples when I have been clear that they have nothing to do with this platform.

John DeNugent advocates Hitler and some bizarre conspiracy theories. He is irrelevant to MR. Some people, who call themselves WN, commend Hitler and “national socialism” as it manifest under Hitler’s auspices. MR does not.

Stop pestering with these questions, they have been asked and answered.

“Just look at Don Blacks Stormfront that proves my point”

I don’t go there. I may have been a bit too favorable of him in the recent post reviewing WN figures that you requested (i.e., he and his cohorts may be - probably are - still too Hitler friendly and all that), but I wanted to point out that he is fairly normal and reasonable compared to others.

  “Who cares about John DeNugent?

He is an important WN leader and one of the longest running who also one of the very few to run for political office in the US.”

He is not important here.

“There was a video series which he covers his political run including news extracts on his site and YouTube before it was taken down by MIB(?).”

Anyone interested is free to look into John DeNugent. He does not fit into MR’s platform and sphere of serious concern.

I am beginning to wonder if you want it to be true in order to make White/European advocacy seem ridiculous.

“Lol! I don’t have to that they do it themselves remember The Order, Sikh temple shooting, Kevin Alfred Strom, the Holocaust museum shooting and former Order member Glen Millers jewish shooting?”

You’ve bundled a number of things here, none of which have anything much to do with MR.

Regarding the Order: The 14 words of David Lane and some of his writings and positions are inspiring. He/they made some mistakes no doubt. Killing Alan Berg was foolish. But I wanted to call attention to the fact that he was denouncing “the right” for those who insist upon that rubric while extolling the 14 words. I was personally moved by his experience as one who had sacrificed his life for White women but had received almost no appreciation from them in jail whereas imprisoned black murderers of innocent Whites could receive a great deal of support from White women.

Regarding Bob Mathews, some of his platform was on the right tack and I wanted to draw attention to the fact that what he was attempting was fairly analogous to what Pilsudski had done, which is now institutionalized and normalized as national heroism - not utterly ridiculous as you would apparently try to make it seem.

That you would bring the Sikh temple shooting into the equation just goes to show what type of thing, bizarre nonsense, you are trying to associate with this discourse. That is entirely irrelevant….same with the Holocaust museum shooting, Kevin Strom…and we have addressed Glen Miller as well. (Though Miller did some effective interviews) we do not commend these people. Stop pestering.

“Wasn’t Don Black and Duke involved with some scandal overseas to help support mercenaries in an African or Caribbean country or something?”

I believe Don Black and a few people tried to take-over the island of Dominica. He was arrested and spent time in jail for that. And so what? You’ve got me regretting that I discussed him with you as it seems you are trying to tie him together as having agreement from MR somehow.

MR’s platform is clear, so is the platform of these peoples that you list. You can plainly see the difference for yourself without pestering me for an explanation of each of these people’s tangled theories, lives and deeds.

White and Nationalism are not words owned separately or together by people who advocate Hitler, Jesus, supremacism or crazy theories and methods.

What I mean by White is “of European extraction.” Nationalism designates the biological borders of a people and the political borders of lands which would be theirs. MR can advocate that in good conscience.


Posted by himmlerrocks on Fri, 05 Dec 2014 05:34 | #

Adolf Hitler was one of the greatest men of the 20th century his work truly shipped the century a thousand years Reich will come soon


Posted by Hitler's DNA on Fri, 05 Dec 2014 06:01 | #

...doubt it. Besides a significant precipitating part in the destruction of tens of millions of European peoples and treasures, both rather seem to reflect a bit of top-heavy and narrow logic for their own elitism while lacking a few critical planks of judgment, wisdom, circumspection and social decency.

Jewish all too Jewish.

Hitler’s DNA only underscores the possibility.


Posted by Sam on Sat, 06 Dec 2014 21:08 | #

Hitler’s DNA only underscores the possibility.

Not sure you really want to go there considering the genetics of Italy.


Posted by IlPadrino on Sun, 07 Dec 2014 02:35 | #

Fine with my genetics, Sam, and not looking to impose them on other European nations. Quite the opposite, looking to protect theirs.

And unlike Hitler, I am not looking to impose mine or ones that I prefer on other nations.


Posted by namedroid on Fri, 12 Dec 2014 17:29 | #

TO MANY OPIONIONS a lot untrue


Posted by Saul on Tue, 16 Dec 2014 10:56 | #

Hitler had flaws, one being that his Y-chromosome was probably Jewish, but he was right about the Jews.


Posted by Henry on Tue, 11 Aug 2015 20:20 | #

Hitler will go down as the greatest Jew who ever for creating the forced migration which created the nation of Israel at least its current formal boarder.  Israels satanic elite the free masons would be the orcastrators. Long live the truly wholely native Americans


Posted by Hasan Yusuf on Sun, 23 Aug 2015 09:30 | #

If Jesus was a Jew,pardoning his killers,in the greatest message of Love,how could the Jews be hated in the Chrisrendom? I suspect that they were targeted for their wealth and their intellect!? Even in modern times,the prominent chess players and scientists have been Jewish.A quote from Shakespeare is irretsitable—-‘Sufferance is the badge of all our tribe!’ And that may include Jesus himself.!!There will never be a substitute for LOVE!?

Post a comment:

Name: (required)

Email: (required but not displayed)

URL: (optional)

Note: You should copy your comment to the clipboard or paste it somewhere before submitting it, so that it will not be lost if the session times out.

Remember me

Next entry: Research: Beauty is Eurasian
Previous entry: Sneeze in your sleeve.  It’s only a pandemic.

image of the day

Existential Issues

DNA Nations

Establishment Problem

All Categories

The Contributors


Endorsement not implied.


Islamist Threat

Anti-white Media Networks






Historical Re-Evaluation

Controlled Opposition

Nationalist Political Parties


Europeans in Africa

Of Note

Recent Comments

Poor Germans being evicted in favor of illegals commented in entry 'Federica Mogherini's cross-eyed view of what it means to be European: At Her Master's Genocidal Call' on Fri, 04 Sep 2015 14:38. (View)

Orbán on migration madness commented in entry 'Federica Mogherini's cross-eyed view of what it means to be European: At Her Master's Genocidal Call' on Thu, 03 Sep 2015 11:53. (View)

Dining room in the country (south France) commented in entry 'Gauguin' on Thu, 03 Sep 2015 03:29. (View)

Czech President calls for United EU Army commented in entry 'Federica Mogherini's cross-eyed view of what it means to be European: At Her Master's Genocidal Call' on Wed, 02 Sep 2015 16:29. (View)

DanielS commented in entry 'Gauguin' on Wed, 02 Sep 2015 14:28. (View)

Guessedworker commented in entry 'Gauguin' on Wed, 02 Sep 2015 09:42. (View)

Lazar Kaganovich commented in entry 'The problem of the Establishment mentality – Part 1' on Wed, 02 Sep 2015 07:02. (View)

TT says, well done, but.. commented in entry 'White Left Imperative to defense, systemic health of European peoples' on Tue, 01 Sep 2015 23:22. (View)

Lee Kwan Yew commented in entry 'Maintenance Summary: The present situation.' on Tue, 01 Sep 2015 07:48. (View)

Alt Right's desperation commented in entry 'White Left Imperative to defense, systemic health of European peoples' on Tue, 01 Sep 2015 06:43. (View)

Genocide of the Irish commented in entry 'Federica Mogherini's cross-eyed view of what it means to be European: At Her Master's Genocidal Call' on Tue, 01 Sep 2015 05:54. (View)

Haim Saban commented in entry '"Rock solid, unwavering, enduring, forever!"' on Mon, 31 Aug 2015 05:38. (View)

Greece getting it high and low commented in entry 'Golden Dawn fighting at the ballot box' on Mon, 31 Aug 2015 05:01. (View)

AIPAC vs Iran deal commented in entry 'MajorityRadio: Susan Lindauer talks with Daniel and GW' on Mon, 31 Aug 2015 03:46. (View)

This is the day, upon the My-oh-my commented in entry 'Trout Mask Replica' on Sun, 30 Aug 2015 18:40. (View)

Huh? commented in entry 'Chinese Offer Solution To European Race Replacement: Clone Europe' on Sun, 30 Aug 2015 06:31. (View)

James Reinfeld commented in entry 'Maintenance Summary: The present situation.' on Sun, 30 Aug 2015 04:35. (View)

Soy Bean Oil = Monsanto Round Up commented in entry '"Rock solid, unwavering, enduring, forever!"' on Sat, 29 Aug 2015 13:07. (View)

Fat, black and proud commented in entry 'Black history 'stolen' in Birth of a Nation, 're-appropriation' in Guess Who's Coming to Dinner?' on Sat, 29 Aug 2015 12:54. (View)

Nazi gold train found in Poland commented in entry 'Poland' on Fri, 28 Aug 2015 16:43. (View)

difference between kkk and liberals.. commented in entry 'Black history 'stolen' in Birth of a Nation, 're-appropriation' in Guess Who's Coming to Dinner?' on Fri, 28 Aug 2015 16:20. (View)

Kelsie Schelling commented in entry 'WHITE WOMEN FOR SALE!' on Fri, 28 Aug 2015 16:07. (View)

DanielS commented in entry 'Maintenance Summary: The present situation.' on Fri, 28 Aug 2015 03:33. (View)

DanielS commented in entry 'Maintenance Summary: The present situation.' on Thu, 27 Aug 2015 16:38. (View)

DanielS commented in entry 'Maintenance Summary: The present situation.' on Thu, 27 Aug 2015 15:15. (View)

Guessedworker commented in entry 'Federica Mogherini's cross-eyed view of what it means to be European: At Her Master's Genocidal Call' on Thu, 27 Aug 2015 11:43. (View)

Kumiko Oumae commented in entry 'Federica Mogherini's cross-eyed view of what it means to be European: At Her Master's Genocidal Call' on Thu, 27 Aug 2015 02:25. (View)

live murder commented in entry 'Black history 'stolen' in Birth of a Nation, 're-appropriation' in Guess Who's Coming to Dinner?' on Wed, 26 Aug 2015 18:03. (View)

Guessedworker commented in entry 'Federica Mogherini's cross-eyed view of what it means to be European: At Her Master's Genocidal Call' on Wed, 26 Aug 2015 08:04. (View)

Sacred Sikh Bling commented in entry 'Should we deviate from authenticity in order to “game” women?' on Tue, 25 Aug 2015 20:09. (View)

Calls his business a religion commented in entry ''White privilege' as a warrant for expropriation; Christianity as the executing jurisdiction.' on Tue, 25 Aug 2015 14:36. (View)

Vito's dancing dasein commented in entry 'A Conspiracy Theory of A Conspiracy Theory to Divert From White Male Dasein' on Tue, 25 Aug 2015 11:56. (View)

We're all brothers on tomorrow commented in entry 'Federica Mogherini's cross-eyed view of what it means to be European: At Her Master's Genocidal Call' on Tue, 25 Aug 2015 11:34. (View)

$600 commented in entry 'WHITE WOMEN FOR SALE!' on Tue, 25 Aug 2015 09:15. (View)

US groups pay smugglers of Africans into EU commented in entry 'African Population Explosion - Augurs to Overwhelm Europe' on Tue, 25 Aug 2015 09:08. (View)