|
|
|
Poles burn effigy of an ultra-Orthodox Jew holding an E.U. flag
Comments:2
Posted by DanielS on Fri, 27 Nov 2015 00:04 | #
It is not “nationalists” that have confronted me, it is 1. People who perhaps think Hitler was one (a nationalist - he wasn’t, he was an imperialist, among other very negative things to European cooperation; nor did he represent White people). 2. People who insist upon imposing Christianity at MR. 3. People who insist upon including Jews among the White/European interest group. Those are the basics. But I will also reject ridiculously speculative theories (conspiracy or otherwise) on the one hand or scientism, if people get carried away with that, on the other. Though that’s probably too subtle a point for a right-wing blog (Morgoth’s). I am entirely consistent. It is disingenuous to say that I have been erratic and extremely disingenuous to say that it is “nationalists” that I have had confrontations with. A few weeks ago you seemed to be considering getting over this right wing thing (even thought about publishing an article of mine). Unfortunately, apparently you got talked out that, and you perhaps saw grand crowds beckoning by way of pandering to Hitler fetishists a la Anglin. Being “erratic” thus, is a projection of the consequence of your rightwingishness; you should consider getting over it rather than trying to make me seem “unstable” because I don’t appreciate Hitler. This pandering will bring you a popular bubble and it will pop when confronted with the reality that you currently deny. You can’t understand why anyone would find it offensive to wish that Hitler had been able to follow through on his plans? I know, I know it’s all a funny joke.
3
Posted by DanielS on Fri, 27 Nov 2015 08:18 | #
Listen Morgoth, this is not a “tantrum” (you might pander to an audience who thinks they can be “neutral” about Hitler) but I do not respect trying to make these issues seem as if they are in my head: its in clear policy at MR, that’s all.
Similar strategy, no great mystery. Hitler, 4chan, polchan etc.
I am familiar with the joke, don’t think its funny. That you have so many sympathizers there for that kind of thing indicates to me that it is not merely a joke, it is pandering as such. You put your email address right underneath it.
No, you should be asking yourself if trafficking in Hitler, swastikas etc is worth dividing Europeans against each other. There is nothing you’ve said of worth that cannot be said without it. You can gain audience by pandering to the Hitler-heads, but it won’t gain my respect. Do you remember when I put up this post of a comment you made, alerting us to Paul Weston’s stunt to get arrested for reciting Churchill? At the time we considered adding you here as a poster, but I was concerned that you were too soft on Jews… perhaps so, among other reasons, because you were behind Paul Weston and Liberty GB, who did not name the Jew and who were a bit of the anti-Jihad, Gates of Vienna school. I don’t know where you were exactly in your J awareness at that point, but you seem to be following a pattern of those who take a crash course over a few years and get inducted into the foibles of the right, presiding as misleader over its inherent instability. I liked your “blue smerfs” article among others. You write very well. The Breitbart article was good, written very well, but cutting and pasting others historical research, 4 chan memes and a few remarks, even if eloquent, does not render one infallible overnight. Oh sure, “I’m all emotional, it’s all psychological, in my head.” Cut that out Morgoth, you can have your right wing circle Jerk with Hitler-heads and Jesus Freaks there. There were important points made here in that regard and this was not “pissing in my corflakles” (typical Matt Parrottesque kind of remark), points made to TradYouth et al, and it is dishonest of you again to try to characterize it as such. I can show careful arguments point by point. These are not tantrums (as someone as disingenuous as Matt Parrott - whom you are probably referring to - tried to suggest, by trying to evoke such a response by trollng me); rather, there are clear rules here - one being that we don’t pander to people who idolize Hitler. You had your email under that picture to make a point, and I made a point that MR has a different position for those who might be put-off.
4
Posted by DanielS on Fri, 27 Nov 2015 10:09 | # There is another important point with regard to what you call my “tantrums”...“all I seem to do” and my “bread and butter.” I have been clearing MR’s platform of Hitler, Jesus and Jewish people for what should be obvious reasons. And again, it has also been necessary to clear out right-wingishness in general - e.g., conspiracy theorists, Austrian school libertarians, those with a supremacist, imperialist, or overly scientistic bent. However, some people cannot accept that and have trolled at MR incessantly, trying to be provocative on those issues and force MR to accept them. Normally, I would simply send them to another blog if they don’t like our platform. In some instances, such as with Matt Parrott, there was no choice but to respond as he’d been invited for a debate by Kumiko. To say that’s “all I do”, or “all I want to do” is real bullshit. Rather, all the right-wing and its trolls have done under its rubric is troll MR - hence the necessity to deal with them and what you take as “all I do.” Its been a first priority to clear them away. Setting the proper platform first is necessary. But it is not all that I have done or all that I will do - to suggest that is bullshit. 5
Posted by DanielS on Sat, 28 Nov 2015 06:54 | #
Daniel Sienkiewicz to Morgoth • 2 minutes ago Are you serious? I have absolutely nothing to apologize for. You should be the one to apologize if anyone. Saying (dishonestly) that I have had confrontations with a “long, long line of ‘nationalists” ...and that “you can’t remember who it was that I had confrontations with but it hardly matters.” ... it hardly matters? I have had confrontations with zero people for their “nationalism” - to the contrary; that, and depicting my reasons as emotional and erratic is dishonest - I have been consistent and with good reason. With regard to Milennial Woes, he came to MR to denounce me for criticizing his Jewish friend Ruth (a.k.a., “The Truth Will Live”), demanding that we take down his link to MR down because I was critical of his Jewish friend’s insistence not only that Jews should be able to be a part of the White struggle (the alt right in particular - and that is when I began to seriously see the need to distance myself and anybody who cares about Whites from the altrght) i.e., when people were saying that she and other Jews should not only be included, but should be able to define our terms for us! Nevertheless, we took down his link without ceremony or rancor and sent him on his judeophilic way - he is here (at Morgoth’s), I suppose. 6
Posted by Pruchnik on Thu, 25 Apr 2019 15:15 | #
Post a comment:
Next entry: Ripper Location Then & Now
|
|
Existential IssuesDNA Nations
|
Posted by Morgoth's pic of the week on Thu, 26 Nov 2015 16:08 | #
Morgoth’s pic of the week.
Contact : .(JavaScript must be enabled to view this email address)
You did, and so did all Europeans because of your idiotic inability/unwillingness to draw and devise proper friend / enemy distinctions.