Why Tommy Robinson Is an Idiot In the Wrong - by Julie Lake

Posted by DanielS on Sunday, 27 May 2018 10:52.

Why Tommy Robinson Is an Idiot In the Wrong

By Julie Lake

The outpouring of indignance of the vertically challenged, Zionist-lobby-funded Lutonian is in ignorance at what the ramifications are for the little girls who were the victims of the Muslim rape trial, which was still ongoing. The so called heroic act of Tommy Robinson has put the entire trial at risk of collapsing and the bastards walking free, laughing up their sleeves. Far from some heroic, brave act, persecuted by police, this is stupidity in the extreme, and this entire sorry saga has brought genuine nationalists into disrepute. If Robinson does not possess one lonely brain cell, to do what any other nationalist would do, i.e. when deciding to film the defendants arriving at court, first approach the court office to check whether the verdict was due Friday, or whether it was still ongoing, which would then make his live streaming a criminal offence, then don’t go sobbing that it’s all so unfair.

Reporting restrictions, especially live streaming in an ongoing trial, are not there for nothing. If some amateur with a camera films defendants arriving at court in an ongoing case, streams their faces live on social media before the day’s proceedings have even started, and then adds his own perception that they are all guilty before a verdict has been reached, along with his own opinions, this can sway public opinion, along with that of the jurors, should they see it. That means, even if it has no effect on the decision of the Jury, those on trial can call a mistrial based on the claim that the premature footage did, can, or will, bias the Jury. In other words, Tommy Robinson put the trial in danger of the defendants being able to claim a mistrial due to public opinion having been swayed, and get off scot free, even if they were as guilty as hell.

                        Tommy, Live at Leeds
                       
                       
                       
For those girls and their families who have had their lives destroyed by these Muslim rape gangs, all they had left in the hope of closure was at least having the peace of mind that their rapists would see justice. The actions of Robinson, who didn’t have the brains just to check that Friday was the day the verdict was due, or whether the trial was still ongoing, could also have resulted in immeasurable hours of police manpower bringing this investigation to court being flushed down the toilet. If Robinson is so stupid that he hadn’t the nous just to check with the court and ask just one simple question, if it was the last day of the trial or whether it was ongoing, because he wants to look the hard man on social media, then his stupidity means that far from being the nationalist and champion of the victims of Muslim rape gangs that he portrays himself as, he is in fact bringing the entire nationalist movement into disrepute and damaging police investigations and closure for those little girls.

Not only did Robinson not bother to check with the court, his stupidity held no bounds in the fact that he was on a suspended prison sentence for doing the exact same thing, for committing contempt of court over a gang rape case heard in Canterbury last year. That was another trial he put in danger of collapsing and the rapists walking free. After he was handed down that suspended sentence, and his lawyer explaining to him the law regarding filming before verdicts are reached, he believed he was so bomb-proof that he could do it again. In each of those trials, he handed the defence the golden egg from the golden goose, for the guilty to claim a mistrial based on not getting a fair hearing. This has set back all the hard work that nationalists for years have been campaigning for. For those who really don’t get this, with their tears for poor old Tommy, this is the law:

“Statutory contempt law bans the media from publishing or broadcasting, including on the internet, any comments or information that might seriously prejudice active legal proceedings, in particular criminal proceedings heard before juries. The concern is that a juror might hear or see something outside of the courtroom that would sway him/her when he/she is deciding whether an accused person is innocent or guilty.”

In short, once legal proceedings become “active”, it is a criminal offence for media organisations to broadcast material which would create “a substantial risk of serious prejudice” to the proceedings. Criminal proceedings become “active” as soon as one of the following has occurred: a person is arrested, a warrant for arrest is issued, a summons has been issued, or a person has been charged, and they remain so until such time as the accused has been acquitted or convicted. Furthermore, liability for statutory contempt is ‘strict’, which means that the broadcaster’s and programme-maker’s knowledge or intention is irrelevant, as is the fact that no actual prejudice was caused in a particular case – the risk of prejudice is sufficient. If contempt is committed intentionally, however, it would be punished even more severely. Common law contempt consists of any other action which is intended to interfere with the administration of justice, for example a sustained campaign by the media to influence legal proceedings. Proceedings need not be active.

Sympathy for Robinson? He has now put two trials at risk of collapse, and destroyed the victims’ only hope of justice and closure. For what? If some clown cannot make a simple phone call to the Court, as a ‘journalist’, as he calls himself, to check that Friday was the last day of proceedings, or if it was still ongoing, to ensure he was not breaking the law in any shape or form, especially given he had already been convicted for the exact same thing and was on a suspended prison sentence that would immediately put him straight back in prison, then save your tears and save your outpouring, because we don’t want to hear it.

Genuine nationalism is about staying within the law and checking up on the law before you undertake any activism, i.e. checking that the area you are protesting in is a public space that will give you the legal right to peaceful protest by law. This is because a nationalist in prison is a totally useless nationalist. I for one will not be banded in the same section of society that is the fame seeking world of Tommy Robinson. He is now in prison because of his own stupidity and desire for fame. Tommy Robinson has damaged nationalism and his stupidity is in part responsible for the new laws being passed through Parliament to restrict nationalist movement. Save your tears, money, and join a real nationalist party, one that has conducted itself in a manner that has avoided prison sentences for its leaders for 51 years.

Finally, don’t even think about classifying the case of Robinson with those of political prisoners, such as Jeremy Bedford-Turner, whose was the result of pressure on the CPS, after it had ruled that he had committed no crime and that there was no case to answer. Robinson’s actions have jeopardised any appeal by genuine victims of the state like Bedford-Turner. Robinson, like Anne Marie Waters, does not care about real nationalists, the victims or those who send him their hard-earned cash, but is interested in self-promotion and fame.


Tommy can you hear me?

Robinson has made a laughing stock of all of you who have bought into him, and if you can’t find some champion of the people who has the nous to check with the court first by means of a simple enquiry on the phone or research reporting restrictions beforehand, then there’s no hope for you. Robinson now being in prison is not the fault of the courts, the police, the CPS, the Commie establishment, or the old woman who lives down the lane. He is there through his own stupidity, arrogance and quest for fame.

While followers of Robinson continue to believe he simply got it wrong and being thrown back in prison, is no more than persecution of the police and state, there are those, furious that his actions, could see a mistrial resulting in the victims never seeing justice, immeasurable police hours, wasted, and the accused escape prosecution on a technicality, leaving them free to rape more children, handed to them on a silver platter, by the very person who claims he is fighting for them.

Source, MJ Online.



Comments:


1

Posted by Muhammed Lubovitch on Mon, 28 May 2018 02:38 | #

Diversity Macht Frei, 27 May 2018:

Was Alison Chabloz undone by her failure to understand the Judeo-Islamic alliance?
   

Alison Chabloz was recently convicted of sending “grossly insulting” communications over the internet by uploading her songs, which tend to make fun of Jews or the Holocaust narrative. A sentence has not yet been imposed, although the judge warned it may be custodial, meaning jail time.

Not long afterwards, Fiyaz Mughal, of Tell Mama, wrote an article in the Jewish Chronicle, describing his association with Chabloz. Tell Mama is a Muslim advocacy organisation, which creates catalogues of “Islamophobic hate incidents” which it then uses as anti-white hate propaganda to demand more privileges for Muslims or the further suppression of the indigenous population.

In July 2013, a woman called Alison Chabloz started to provide written reports to Tell MAMA. Over months, Chabloz impressed me with her apparent dedication to reporting abuse and defending minority communities against hate crime. I grew to admire her, to the extent that I offered her support when she was sacked from her job overseas and needed help to travel home. I came to regret I had ever let my guard down and trusted her.

Unbeknown to me, Chabloz had lost her job because she had been outed for online antisemitism. Shortly afterwards, this evidence was presented to me, making it very clear that Chabloz was not who I thought she was. Chabloz’s mission wasn’t to defend Muslims, it was to target Jews. She was obsessed with trying to find evidence that would result in Jewish people being investigated and humiliated. I realised that I had not only been conned, but used.

Source

As I’ve mentioned several times before, Tell Mama is a “Kosher Muslim” front group which Jews were intimately involved in setting up. It was intended as a Muslim Copy-Paste of the Jewish ethno-activist group, the Community Security Trust (CST). When the Muslims turned out to be rather cack-handed at executing the blueprint, the Jews literally moved in and did a full-scale takeover. It is now run by a Jew, Richard Benson, who was formerly the chairman of the CST.

So Alison Chabloz was reporting (presumably on Jews) to an organisation that Jews themselves had been involved in founding; and which, even back then, they were probably still assisting in an advisory capacity.

It’s worth asking how Chabloz got on the Jews’ radar (the Jewdar) in the first place? Was it actually through her reporting to Tell Mama? She reported on “Islamophobic” Jews and her Tell Mama contacts got in touch with their Jewish friends and told them about this kuffar/goy woman who kept reporting Jews to them? And the Jews then began to subject her to closer scrutiny, trawling through her social media posts, looking for ammunition they could use to get her dismissed from her job on a cruise ship?

I should stress that I don’t know any of this to be true. It is pure speculation on my part. Nonetheless, it strikes me as a plausible scenario.

While I have sympathy for Alison Chabloz, I’m struggling to see how anyone who believes that Europeans have the right to remain in secure possession of their ancestral living spaces could think that helping push the “Islamophobia” narrative was in any way in our interests. Whatever problems we face from Jews, demographic takeover isn’t one of them. Maybe she was a liberal before and only became a “white nationalist” recently?

Or could this whole thing be a lie? I have no evidence for her collaboration with Muslims other than the article in the Jewish Chronicle. It could conceivably be a falsehood intended to damage her credibility with the white nationalist community. But since she’s been photographed at “Free Palestine” events, I’m afraid it strikes me as all too plausible.

As I have documented in innumerable blog posts, the Judeo-Islamic alliance has been working together against us for 1400 years. Jews were intimately involved in the creation of Islam and even in the writing of the Koran. Their goal? Recruit a zombie army to help displace the Christian Byzantine empire from Palestine, a goal they successfully achieved. And Muslims have proved useful to them as a zombie army ever since, albeit one that occasionally slips out of control.

It is delusional for any European ethno-nationalist to think that either of the two “Semitic separatist” communities can be a reliable partner against the other. Alison Chabloz’s failure to understand that may well have been responsible for her downfall.


2

Posted by Why Greg Johnson Does’t Support Tommy on Mon, 28 May 2018 11:39 | #

Countercurrents, “Why I Don’t Support Tommy Robinson”, 28 May 2018:

Greg Johnson

632 words

On Friday, May 25th, UK white advocate Tommy Robinson was arrested outside Leeds Crown Court as he live-streamed accused members of a Muslim gang of child rapists entering the building for sentencing. After more than an hour, he was arrested.

He was then convicted of contempt of court, specifically because it is illegal to film people connected with ongoing court cases. Violating this law could be used by the defendants’ lawyers to argue for a mistrial.

Yes, Robinson’s actions actually made it more likely the defendants would go free.

Robinson cannot, moreover, plead ignorance of the law, because last year he was arrested for the same offense at a gang-rape trial in Canterbury. In that case, his sentence was suspended under condition that he not reoffend for another 18 months. Because he violated the conditions of his suspended sentence, he was ordered to spend 13 months in jail. The judge also ordered that the case not be discussed in the press — probably because of the ongoing nature of the proceedings. Apparently, a new batch of defendants will be tried starting in September.

The fact that Robinson’s safety in jail is threatened by large numbers of non-white and Muslim prisoners is unfortunate. But that is not an argument against jailing him, since that would basically give him carte blanche to break the law with impunity. He should, however, receive special protection in jail.

There is understandably a great deal of distrust of the British government for their role in covering up the mass rape of white children by Muslim gangs. There is, furthermore, good reason to distrust the government for suppressing dissenting opinions on topics connected to race and immigration. So there has been an outcry in defense of Robinson, accusing the government of suppressing freedom of speech and covering up a scandal.

But we need to think this through.

No legal system is perfect. But outlawing contempt of court is not an illegitimate, Orwellian form of repression. Its purpose is to secure due process, on the assumption that this leads to justice. Again, by interfering in the court proceedings, Robinson actually made it less likely that the criminals will be punished. But he went to the courthouse anyway.

His motive is unclear. Given that he had already been arrested for the same offense, he clearly knew what he was doing. Thus he must have judged this publicity stunt worth the risk of setting a gang of child rapists free. That’s a breathtakingly selfish decision. I don’t see any way of avoiding the conclusion that Tommy Robinson is morally reckless and probably a bit stupid.

Nationalists, therefore, should not be rushing to his defense.

Loyalty to our team is admirable. But our first loyalty should be to our cause. And if people bring our cause into disrepute, we need to call them on it. Tommy Robinson has harmed the cause of justice for the victims of child rapists. He has made it harder, not easier, for these rape gangs to be successfully prosecuted.

White advocates have the whole system against us. Our only allies are truth and justice. Our greatest source of credibility is speaking the truth and defending justice.

But truth and justice are not on Tommy Robinson’s side. I hope he receives safe custody and the due process he would so casually deny others. But white advocates around the world need to guard our credibility, not squander it in what is essentially a white chimp-out based on the false premise that Tommy Robinson is a martyr for freedom of speech and the pursuit of justice for the victims of Muslim pedophile gangs. Trayvon Martin and Michael Brown were not innocent children martyred by racists. They were victims of their own poor judgment and reckless behavior. The same is true of Tommy Robinson.


3

Posted by Guessedworker on Mon, 28 May 2018 15:12 | #

Greg mistakes three separate trials for an “on-going trial”.  Manifestly, later trials do not belong to earlier trials, or else there could be no innocence before proven guilty.

One John Piggott offered the following reading at Spiked! this morning:

http://www.spiked-online.com/newsite/article/we-have-to-stop-saying-asian-grooming-gangs/21422

The question relating to all this is twofold:

1. Why was REDACTED processed so rapidly? Did REDACTED have the opportunity, using his own lawyers who know his case, to produce a defence? The answer to the latter seems to be no. Was his trial, therefore, fair? Has the legal system been brought into disrepute by a rushed and political reaction.

2. OK, discussion of the legal content of the second of the three trials could have prejudiced a jury sitting in the third trial, due to take place next month. But the second trial was finished, so how could said discussion - of the guilty verdicts only - have prejudiced a jury more than the verdicts themselves? Discussing simply the verdicts must be as protected from contempt, and not less protected, than the court is itself in giving those verdicts, as it is bound to do. It is only necessary to warn the members of a fresh jury to put out of its mind all information which they might have encountered elsewhere prior to their empanelling, as is standard practise with any re-trial - and, heaven knows, they happen frequently enough. The system works. It just isn’t necessary to impose the police state provisions common with trials for terrorism and/or touching upon matters of national security. Are the elites telling us their interests are consonant with national security? It seems that way.

That said, one appreciates ... and would certainly support ... the interest of the court in protecting the legal integrity of the third trial. But there is a strong imputation that REDACTED was dealt with so severely because he is REDACTED ... it’s political ... whereas a return to prison to serve just his remaining time or even a serious dressing-down would have been sufficient. It is the implication that the Establishment is anti-white and vindictive which is so damaging, and which those involved really need to understand and take on-board. It does, after all, follow three long decades of appalling, deliberate and studied negligence by those in positions of power locally and nationally in respect to Muslim paedophile trafficking and prostitution of white children. There is an apology owing, not a repressive hand. They jump quick enough when there is criticism from Muslims, Jews, blacks, homosexuals, etc. We are the English. Don’t they fear our disapproval also? They should. They are there to serve us too.


4

Posted by John Pig-guts on Tue, 29 May 2018 00:44 | #

Limp-wristed faggot Greg Johnson is just interested in protecting his fellow pedophiles.


5

Posted by Counter-Queers on Tue, 29 May 2018 08:08 | #

CC, Greg Johnson may be derided as an elitist right-wing snob, with attendant disingenuousness and naivete; and he is certainly a queer - but a pedophile? Probably not. If not for the context (a CC comment) it would be a serious accusation.

Nevertheless, the right wing ranking of homosexuality as a problem right up there with White genocide is tedious and tiresome stupidity that should make one eager to leave the right-wing behind - it was David Lane’s advice to leave the right wing behind in their bizarre conspiracy theories and Jesus communities.

People who make a big issue out of queers, pro or con, are absurd - what percentage of the population are they?

And what percentage of male homos there are, well, then don’t go to the goddamn queer bars, and be glad that there are more women for you.

As for the lesbians, be glad that they are not rewarding groids, YKW and other assholes with their treasure or having babies with them…


6

Posted by Guessedworker on Tue, 29 May 2018 09:14 | #

You don’t have to stoop to CC’s Stormfront level ... “groids, YKW and other assholes” is not fitting.  CC is beyond help, as you intimate; and seems to regard coherent and useful thinking, of which he is exceptionally capable, as some sign of unacceptably non-Hitlerian advocacy.  In a sense, he represents much of what is wrong with American WN, which is that fully capable people reduce themselves to the level of the mob instead of stepping up to reform, re-shape, and direct it.  The cause may be a loss of real belief in the possibilities of the movement.  In any case, into the vacuum has stepped the Alt-Right and its Jewish video artistes.


7

Posted by DanielS on Thu, 31 May 2018 05:20 | #

GW, let me try to examine your comment within the light of the highest criteria:

Posted by Guessedworker on Tue, 29 May 2018 04:14 | #

Guessedworker: You don’t have to stoop to CC’s Stormfront level ... “groids, YKW and other assholes” is not fitting.

While “stooping” is a pejorative term, let me appreciate the fact that you want discourse at Majorityrights to occur in an elevated register so that its parsings of issues related to the protection and fostering of our peoples are not confused with emotive and brute, prejudicial shorthand that can have our cause written-off just as efficiently by our antagonists as “ignorance”, and allow them to continue to mislead people who ought to be sympathetic rather to the moral virtue of our cause.

Now then, I have not been to Stormfront in years, and never more than a few times, quite briefly. The site just never spoke to me, but then again, that is why I am on board with your wanting to establish difference from them - it is a well chosen point of departure.

Although I must say, with regard to cussing and epithets, Stormfront’s central figures - Don Black and David Duke, don’t allow it on their discussion board and David Duke was even behind something called “The New Orleans Protocol” which proscribed such speech.

Prominent friends of American WN and the Stormtroopers Kevin MacDonald and Tom Sunic have also sought to proscribe such language as advancing negative, skinhead, if not low-brow stereotypes in pejorative association with White/European advocacy.

I never agreed with the universalizing of that rule, and I will explain why below.

I can agree, however, that discourse in higher register, free of profanity and epithets ought to be the rule here at Majorityrights, basically for two reasons:

1) European laws (although, believe it or not, a few comments recently, could even be problematic in America, despite the first Amendment). Having said that, these laws should be looked upon as a fact,  even if not necessarily correct.

There is an Alinsky-like aspect to these laws prohibiting the use of epithets which is to force Whites/Europeans to live up to a destructive universalism that was our predominant guiding rule structure through the epoch of modernity.

That is, this universalism has been weaponized against us to where you can’t even call a spade a spade, can’t name its difference.

As Sunic would say, this is going to then move directly through processes and self censorship about noticing differences - some stark differences not articulated, but especially subtle ones that may need to be drawn out.

2) Basically, we do want to not only display, but actually conduct our inquiry in a register that will allow for subtle parsing, untrammeled by the bullying of “common sense” or merely accepted, unconsidered habits and traditions.

Having said that, I respect that as a rule, not as something that should never be deviated from according to circumstance - it is only the general circumstance of pernicious European law that prevents me from exercising that discretion of deviating from the rule where appropriate.

Which brings me to a point of disagreement with regard to your use of the word, “fitting.”

Is it “fitting” to address a Captainchaos type with the kind of social eloquence that one might recommend of a suitor courting an heiress as she strokes her French poodle in the front salon?

Is it “fitting” of our cause to participate in the modernist, universalizing rational blindness that’s been fostered by the YKW, that would dismiss the urgency of a CC and his circumstance as “vulgar”?

“Don’t shout in emergency, CC, don’t be emphatic that you and yours are being stabbed, killed, raped by *******! Don’t signal their group pattern and your group pattern in a clear call to the emergency so that people may have the straight rule structured difference, clear and unambiguous to separate and protect themselves - They are not the same, they are goddamn *******!”

“No, CC. Be nice or Greg Johnson will ban you from his courtly salon - that is where you wanted to go for help against ******* if you found that his sister in the other parlor wasn’t worth the trouble and would just as soon **** *******.”

While I must respect your concern for European (and American) law, right or wrong, I’m afraid, GW, that you may also be expressing a habit of modernist universalizing.

To be competent in post modernity means to be able to see differences in circumstances, particular people and cultures, so that they can be coordinated with.

In order to coordinate with a CC, I may “stoop” - I would say, rather, “adjust” - to interface his circumstances and concerns in their qualitative legitimacy, his reality. And not run rough shod over coordination in narcissistic assumption that everyone should be concerned first and foremost with my received and preferred mannerly register and decorum at all times - despite the dark gauntlet that threatens the politely oblivious.

That brings me to a concern that still being in the habit of Modernity, you are still treating conceptual frameworks - specifically, the concept of post modernity - as a found object and assuming (narcissistically is a hard word, but I don’t mean it hard, its what modernity prescribes - “we are all pretty much the same in our being, thinking and motives”) that those people, like Jordan Peterson, Camille Paglia, Foucault, Derrida, the YKW and legions of their misguided college social studies students. . define “post modernity” properly ...“we have no say, no social constructionist agency.”

Should we be able to snap back to “higher” register where indeed appropriate, as in the rule of MR, knowing how intelligent that CC is, in order to compel him to come up to his and our normal level? Yes. Inability to do that would not be competent within post modernity either; and I would not be taking responsibility for the possibility of aiding and abetting some dubious commentary by CC, as if he/we lacked agency and capacity to adjust intelligently.

Furthermore, if speaking with sufficient decorum were your only concern, then YOU would be the shallow one, lacking in appropriately substantive concern.

But I believe, rather, that your critical stance toward Stormfront - along with the American demographic that Don Black and David Duke cater-to with it - how they pander, make excuses, never seriously criticizing Hitler and “the greatest stories never told” about him, does show you to be substantive in your concern, and making a post modern distinction between a culture - An American culture which can be extremely negative - and that is all the more reason to get post modernity right, so that we can make use of its option to invoke traditional ethnocentrism, with its recognition that there are OTHER cultures/peoples with different ways of life, that require different rules of dealing with them so that we don’t get clobbered in the naivete of assuming they are just like us, with the same motives - as modernity would largely assume in premise.

That Stormfront panders to America’s White demographic which is largely German/Irish, and less sympathetic to the Allied side in WWII is clear. CC would fall in that demographic, but just the fact that he comes here means that he is capable of the White post modern sophistication to recognize that these are different circumstances, that both of us honestly look upon Germany and Germans as our brother nation and people - we care for them and their distinct sovereignty as we care for all European nations - we seek to coordinate with them as such - coordination is something that (White) post modernity facilitates, while modernity takes for granted that it will run rough shod over coordination with other cultures/national differences.

.....

Guessedworker:  CC is beyond help, as you intimate;

When you say CC is beyond help, I believe you say that with a bit of humor (I don’t want to say irony, because Rorty is another butcher of the post modern concept - its not all about “irony”, it is rather about making clear distinctions).

True, CC probably will not stop trying to break the rules of decency and respect, will not stop trying to upset and provoke, but one nevertheless observes an intelligent man who basically shares our concerns.

I’m not saying that when push comes to shove, he might not go a way that’s counter productive to our capacity to coordinate our interests, but that’s not here and now, that’s not because he has the nerve to be irreverent toward movement luminaries such as Bowery and Greg Johnson.

Guessedworker: and seems to regard coherent and useful thinking, of which he is exceptionally capable, as some sign of unacceptably non-Hitlerian advocacy.

Yes, he is exceptionally capable and he is wrestling with a problem that I’ve observed and a project for its correction, which is that Euroman has been overly given to self transcendenece - which corresponds with self sacrifice for the sake of ever more pseudo intellectualism - thus, how to integrate self assertion and real intelligence, real intelligence with regard to ethnonationalism ...Not by saying one should Never use profanity and epithets.

However, coming back to substance, I agree with you that following Hitler is not the answer either; and I believe that CC’s perspective is difficult in that he experiences the American PC onslaught with the anti-Hitler thing right on top of him - so, without an angular perspective, lacking perspective, he pushes right back - “No!, Hitler was basically good, true and innocent.”

The hope is that he or his type will see that we can appreciate that Hitler was intelligent, that he had somethings right, and that we like and appreciate the German people. We do. Hopefully the Stormfront panderers, and those under-informed boomer mavens who foster an internet bubble community of Hitler apologists among the millennials, hopefully we will be able to overcome their misguiding line which says that to be anti-Hitler is to be anti-German.

Because the reverse is true. We care about Germans and their sovereign nation(s) whereas Hitler, in his devotion to scientism of natural struggle in might makes right, placed that scientistic, “natural” fallacy above the German people (let alone the rest of Europe).

We are against Hitler because on balance he was bad for European peoples, including the Germans, and markedly bad for the coordination among Europeans, here and in diaspora; and in coordination with most other peoples (except those who really hate Jews and don’t really care about how many Whites get killed in his program).

I believe tarring White Nationalism (and I mean WN as terms independent of “what it means” according to Ramzpaul, “1.0”, Stormfront, DailyStormer or whomever), just White (the genus European to include their diaspora and nationalism, i.e., ethno nationalism) with Nazism is certainly something that our enemies would want to do and that is why, for example, they’ve enlisted shabbos goy Jim Goad to have a talk with nubie “red pilled” Patrick Little, to draw out his appreciation and apologia for Hitler…and thus divert and derail his would be platform into one far more counter productive to White interests. It is a typical Duke Stormfront perspective: Only the Jews are a problem - that view justifies Hitler, who was “really ok, understandable in his motives then, misunderstood; nobody else, not blacks or anybody else is a big problem.”

Guessedworker:In a sense, he represents much of what is wrong with American WN, which is that fully capable people reduce themselves to the level of the mob instead of stepping up to reform, re-shape, and direct it.

Again, I am afraid that here, you are treating “American WN” as a found object, which means, “objectively”, like “post modernity”, treating it like what the YKW and reactionaries say it means.

We must not let YKW or the reactionaries they inspire define our terms - or naively treat them as if they are objectively found objects.

No, going Bowery and just getting into pure scientific empiricism because (((they))) “always” win with their words and their hermeneutics is not the answer - If we let them, they will twist these words and yank us all around, encourage reactionaries to do that as well…

Like Ramzpaul:

In his recent discussion with “Comfygirl”, he denounced “WN 1.0” because of its association with 14/88. He’s against 14/88; well so am I.

But I’m not against 14.

David Lane’s friend, TT Metzger and TT sidekick, “Ghostwolfradioman” demonstrated that you can advocate just the 14 - while rejecting Lane’s enshrinement of the “88” ...

These Americans learned from earlier mistakes in White advocacy. They are not WN 1.0.

TT, despite being half German, of course caring for his German people, recognized that Hitler idealization is wrong, bad for them and bad for the cooperation of White people.

As I would say that Hitler’s 88 words held the scientistic fallacy:

Hitler: “so that our people may mature for the fulfillment of the mission allotted it by the creator of the universe.”

It is philosophically lame. It may be inspirational to low brow types, the same kind who’d be snookerd in by Christianity, but it is philosophically incompetent and dangerous in its non-human linearity - that was born out indeed - unfortunately.

The fourteen words of David Lane, on the other hand? Yes, I like them. I like the second version too, being so superficial as to be inspired by pretty White women as I am. But then, the 14 Words do not only inspire White men, they tend to work for women too, as in the blonde fox who beamed smiles at me in Dragon club when I wore my jacket there.

   

Guessedworker:The cause may be a loss of real belief in the possibilities of the movement.

I began this comment with the statement that I wanted to set your concerns in the light of the highest criteria. Believing that is so, I have come here and brought the best in the resource missing to White/European ethnonational advocacy and the theory of how that is to be conducted.

Guessedworker: In any case, into the vacuum has stepped the Alt-Right and its Jewish video artistes.

There is no vacuum here, at MR, only awaiting one of your participation in the theory that has been extended to valance your concerns and highest aspirations as to how they are to be parsed….

For the lack of this acknowledgement, however, as one might remain in modernist reaction, accepting Jewish definition and those who react to them as wielding accurate terminology and concepts that have been objectively found and described without Jewish and deracinating purposes…there has been a vacuum…

Deliberately the voice of MR has been quieted ..they hope that reaction will be instigated once again, its beginnings in scientist reaction will win the day as “revolutionary” “new possibilities”....

That it will stay in and join the Alt Right along with their Jewish cohorts against “The Left”...


8

Posted by DanielS on Thu, 31 May 2018 06:03 | #

I am concerned that for your reaction, your vendetta against Jewish and liberal academia, being outside of the academic loop as you’ve been, your competitive business model oblivious to that, has tended to blind you - but hopefully not forever, GW, to the important, good, differences that I bring to bear on theory and practice of ethnonationalism.

I have a tinge of paranoia enough about your competitiveness, vendetta, perhaps a bit of English pride, that this comment of yours was an indirect trivialization of my 14 Words post, as something that was “stooping” to American Stormfront levels….

For the possibility of that misconception it is important to observe that some people, Americans, do make a distinction between 14 and 88 ...and it is important to not let the YKW and their flunkies like Ramzpaul put them back together.

You have been correct to hold fast to emergentism and the sort of teleology that it directs - I have learned as anyone who has paid attention here has learned from your steadfast - it is deep. However, I must say in my defense, that my view was never mutually exclusive to this - in fact, it would see opposition to emergentism as Cartesian. And, on the other hand, your treating emergentism as ex nihlo a-priori and even mutually exclusive to interaction, let alone interactive and social construction is Cartesian, and simply mistaken - probably born of reaction to and resentment of Jewish and liberal academic distortion, abuse and misrepresentation of post modern social concepts.

As opposed to cultivating the corrective resource that I’ve brought here at Majorityrights, they (the Alt Right) join in reactive perspection to argue against “the left” - and that is to be a foolishly misguided reactionary of the kind who are coming out of their Duke/KM coddled bubbles, nubies who’ve been maneuvered by Jews mainly (and their right wing White attaches’) into arguing against the social organization and unionization in response (reaction) to distortions of those concepts - e.g., (((Frame Games))) is pushing hard against these “lefty social justice warriors” ...after all, who wants the goyim to unionize on behalf of social justice now that the Jews are so firmly perched in the seven or nine power niches atop the world?....

Speaking of that, I will be having more to say about (((Framegames))) and his talks with those functioning in the realm of White advocacy, including JF Gariepy - his 138 I.Q.is looking to be not good enough.


9

Posted by Tommy Tard on Fri, 01 Jun 2018 17:52 | #

MR has long ago belled the cat on Tommy Robinson - here, for one example.

       

But just for a refresher course on his dubious credentials:

CounterCurrents, “The Truth about Tommy Robinson”,

by Huntley Haverstock

There’s been plenty of heated discussion about what our stance towards Tommy Robinson ought to be, given his recent arrest.

When I first saw the video of Robinson’s arrest, I was horrified. The video really makes it look like Robinson was just arrested over a simple exercise of free speech. When I first saw people floating around comment sections who seemed to have more interest in pushing black-pilled conspiracy theories about Robinson than pushing back against the obvious injustice of a state ready to silence people for speaking about these ethnic rape gangs, that would crush us just as happily as it had apparently crushed him for doing the same thing, I was filled with rage. How can these people be so deeply missing the point just to countersignal someone who’s out there for God’s sakes at least doing something while they sit at home?

In the hours of reading since, however, I’ve become one of them. My position now is that what Tommy Robinson did was both tactically and strategically idiotic, and it would be a serious mistake for us to throw our lot in with his.

The leading pro-Tommy position is: “even though Tommy isn’t ‘our guy,’ it’s in our interests to stand up for his free speech when his speech is violated by the same people who would love to violate ours.”

It’s understandable that this has emerged as the leading pro-Tommy position, because it’s the best argument of the lot.

Much of the criticism of Tommy has focused on pointing out that he isn’t /ourguy/. His alliances with, and insistence that all “real Britons” are, Zionists. The fact that he went out of his way to slander everyone who appeared in Charlottesville last year as “Nazis,” when the vast majority of these people were “Nazis” in no more or less the same sense that so many people in the UK think Tommy himself is a “Nazi” and Tommy was doing to others exactly what he doesn’t want to see happen to him.

But this approach is unfortunate and misleading, because the fact that Tommy Robinson isn’t 100% on board with our program is not the reason we shouldn’t support him. The reason we shouldn’t support him is because he was not arrested for an act of free speech; he was arrested for a self-destructive, counter-productive, self-aware act of sabotage.

To the points about Tommy’s history with Zionist organizations, I should add that in 2013 when Tommy Robinson was arrested for £160,000 in mortgage fraud, the judge “described Robinson as a ‘fixer’ who had introduced others to fraudulent mortgage broker (((Deborah Rothschild))).” This is important not merely because it shows that Tommy isn’t “our guy” in terms of his platform, but because it proves his character is that of a disreputable opportunist. This is relevant because the most plausible interpretation of Tommy Robinson’s most recent action turns out to be ‘disreputable opportunism.’

So what actually happened here?

First of all, the reason laws in the UK and the US differ here on this specific issue is not because the two countries take different approaches to “free speech.” That actually has nothing to do with it at all. Rather, the laws differ for a far more straightforward and practical reason: because trials are conducted differently between the two countries. Quite simply, in the UK, when multiple related trials are planned to be held in sequence, it’s considered too costly and burdensome to sequester every jury involved in every single one of the trials for the entire duration until all of the trials have concluded. Instead, it seems far less onerous to simply ban reporting about any particular one of the trials until all of them have concluded. Then the juries can go about their lives until they’re ready to be called in for their particular trial, and the judiciary can rest assured that going about their lives in society won’t bias their judgments as a jury. This is why the reporting bans violated by Tommy Robinson exist. That’s it.

And if prejudicial reporting gets in the way of those assumptions, cases like these absolutely can and have declared mistrial. What does that mean? In the best case, it means justice is delayed, and taxpayers have to spend thousands starting the trial all over again, dragging witnesses through the emotional torture of being cross-examined all over again. At worst, it means cases can be dropped completely, or charges can be substantially reduced.

Some people think that these laws just wouldn’t be enforced in other circumstances, and that they’d selectively been pulled out here, and only here, in the case of Tommy Robinson. They’re just dead wrong. You can read a list of some high-profile cases that have been thrown out in the UK over this very issue right here. It really does happen, and anyone feeding you an opinion about this event that doesn’t understand that has no right to be talking about it. This is in fact standard procedure in the UK.

There are some who support Tommy on this whether his actions were stupid or illegal or not because they have no hope for justice to come through the traditional court system in the first place. And there is a kernel of truth to this, for sure: there have been a disturbing number of cases of Muslim rapists getting off scot-free, and we know that some councillors and policemen had sex with Rotherham victims—and thus most certainly knowingly participated in the cover-up. The guarantee that justice will be served in this case is not 100%. This should concern all of us gravely.

But here is what these people need to keep in mind: we know that upwards of 75% of the child molesters in the UK are Muslim.

How do we know this? We know this because of successful conviction rates.

The UK is in fact arresting about three times as many Muslim as white pedophiles right now. That’s how we know that upwards of 75% of child molesters in the UK are Muslim—because justice is still fortunately being served more often than not. “The state” is not one monolithic entity, and just because some elements of the state have participated in or covered up these events doesn’t mean others aren’t working to see justice served. Plenty of them still are.

n this case, we know that Tommy Robinson knew that there was a reporting ban. He mentions the fact on his own livestream the very day he was arrested. That means he knew he was likely to get arrested for what he did, and it means he knew that a mistrial could occur as a consequence of it. We can also see Tommy on video here attempting to entrap a mainstream journalist into contempt of court by talking about the results of a trial that weren’t to be released until later that day (the journalist didn’t know that the video recording them was live-streaming, and he promptly leaves after being alerted to the fact and seeing the shit-eating grin on Tommy’s face when he asks Tommy if he can turn the stream off).

In fact, Tommy himself was already arrested for committing this very offense previously—and here is how the judge concluded that trial at the time:

“[Y]ou should be under no illusions that if you commit any further offence of any kind, and that would include, I would have thought, a further contempt of court by similar actions, then that sentence of three months would be activated, and that would be on top of anything else that you were given by any other court.

In short, Mr Yaxley-Lennon, turn up at another court, refer to people as “Muslim paedophiles, Muslim rapists” and so and so forth while trials are ongoing and before there has been a finding by a jury that that is what they are, and you will find yourself inside. Do you understand?” (emphasis mine)

And here is a quote from the judge from the hearing when Robinson was arrested this time:

This contempt hearing is not about free speech. This is not about freedom of the press. This is not about legitimate journalism; this is not about political correctness; this is not about whether one political viewpoint is right or another. It is about justice, and it is about ensuring that a trial can be carried out justly and fairly. It is about ensuring that a jury are not in any way inhibited from carrying out their important function. … It is pejorative language which prejudges the case, and it is language and reporting – if reporting indeed is what it is – that could have had the effect of substantially derailing the trial. As I have already indicated, because of what I knew was going on I had to take avoiding action to make sure that the integrity of this trial was preserved, that justice was preserved and that the trial could continue to completion without people being intimidated into reaching conclusions about it, or into being affected by “irresponsible and inaccurate reporting”. If something of the nature of that which you put out on social media had been put into the mainstream press I would have been faced with applications from the defence advocates concerned, I have no doubt, to either say something specific to the jury, or worse, to abandon the trial and to start again. That is the kind of thing that actions such as these can and do have, and that is why you have been dealt with in the way in which you have and why I am dealing with this case with the seriousness which I am.

If Robinson continues using the lie that his “free speech” was violated and he had no idea he could be arrested to fleece his supporters for donations, then he is an out-and-out fraud who should be completely abandoned by everyone. Tommy Robinson has talked plenty about ethnic rape gangs for a plenty long time, and he has never once been arrested solely for “speech.”

What actually happened here is this:

1. Tommy had been arrested for endangering the integrity of criminal trials before.
2. The last time he was arrested for it, he was told in no uncertain terms he would be in jail if he did it again.
3. He went right out and did it again.
4. Even though it does absolutely nothing to help his cause, and
5. it did stand a serious chance of harming the real victims of this case.


10

Posted by Tommy Tards on Fri, 01 Jun 2018 18:18 | #

MJolnir, “HERO-WORSHIP AND TOMMYTARDS”, 28 May 2018:


As you will no doubt have realised from the photo above, I do not think he is a hero for our times. In fact, I do not think he is in control of much of what he says. From the very beginning, Robinson has had a dubious relationship with organised Jewry in Britain and this has meant toeing the line of “diversity and inclusion” (see picture above). While his identification of Islam as a problem and direct confrontation of Muslims has been admirable and shows real bravery, divorcing the problem from the subject of race has not just been deliberate, but a conscious dishonest and political choice to align himself with Jewish interests.


The English Defence League, after all, was formed in the image of the Jewish Defence League, a terrorist group that aligned itself to militant Negro groups in America. It was started just a couple of weeks after the BNP had gained two MEPs in the European elections of June 2009, reaching the height of its power, and we in the BNP were aware that the EDL had been created for three reasons:

1. to syphon off support for the BNP and channel it into dead ends
2. to create a group of “far-right” football hooligans that were a soft target for the press and could be linked to the BNP
3. to make good little “anti-racists” out of nationalists.

From the very beginning, despite doing good work in exposing Muslim paedophile gangs, it also promoted multi-racialism and attacked genuine nationalists in Britain who had been exposing the same as “racists”. The EDL under Robinson had various groups within it, including a Jewish section and an LGBT one. In other words, the EDL promoted the same agenda as the government. This is not to say there were not any good people in the EDL. There certainly were, but they were coerced into toeing the PC line, with Robinson being convicted of headbutting someone he referred to as a “neo-Nazi” in 2011.

Indeed, when Robinson left the EDL in 2013, he cited “extremism” as being the reason and suddenly started working with the Leftist/Muslim think tank Quilliam and appearing on the BBC, no longer as an antagonist, but as one of the fold. In 2016, he was invited for a trip to Israel by Jewish Youtuber “Brian of London” (but obviously rather more of Tel Aviv), where he became a mouthpiece for Israeli propaganda. He has since worked for Ezra Levant’s Rebel Media, a Jewish Canadian internet media outlet that has promoted Israeli intersts in the Middle East and Jewish interests in the West, including the usual Jewish hypocracy of advocating a Jewish ethnostate while undermining ethno-nationalism in other countries. Let us be clear: Robinson has always undermined ethno-nationalism for Whites.

[....]

Furthermore, it was made clear that the Leeds trial was under reporting restrictions, as stated in an article in The Examiner among other places from the beginning of the trial. Note well the words: “We understand the trial will carry reporting restrictions which would only allow any reporting on conclusion of the case.” The case is not yet concluded, as more are awaiting sentencing. And, as Julie Lake stated, the defendants’ lawyers may now be able to argue for a mistrial. What is as bad is that the whole case has now been forgotten in favour of the Tommy Robinson Show. His grandstanding has made himself the centre of attention, and, while I understand the masses’ need for heroes, he has done it at the expense of what is really important: the victims and their families.

[...]

 

What has also disappointed me are the comments that went into moderation, with the utmost filth being written by the army of blind Tommytards - and I am not ashamed to say that I deleted them. I do not say that all who have fallen for Tommy Robinson’s charm and patter are Tommytards, but they need to find better heroes. I understand that the media have built him up as a legitimate rebel leader and working-class hero by constantly interviewing him and giving him air time. Jeremy Bedford-Turner was never given air time, who is currently serving twelve months for so-called hatespeech. And where were the talking heads of the alternative media when he was sent down? Where were Lauren Southern, Stefan Molyneux, Paul Joseph Watson & co. then?

[...]

Here’s what I expect next: I expect leading politicians in Israel to criticise the British government over its handling of Tommy Robinson in order to gain the support of ordinary Britons for Israel and organised Jewry at large. This will mean they will be free to continue the promotion of miscegenation and decadence in British culture. Tommy Robinson’s celebrity will grow - expect a book out soon! And he will lead - oh yes, he will lead - us all to the promised land of kosher fake nationalism…


.....


11

Posted by Marlene Guest on Fri, 01 Jun 2018 18:47 | #

Ibid:

                   

And now, here is the real hero when it comes to exposing Muslim child-rape gangs - or rather heroine - who is sadly now deceased. She was Marlene Guest, a woman who worked tirelessly compiling dossiers of evidence and petitioning the police, media and government to investigate and prosecute those responsible, and to do their duty in protecting White children. She continued in her duty while battling cancer right up to her death at the end of 2014. It is a sad fact that the real heroes get no fanfare in the present age, for real heroes are given no air time, but it is my privilege to have known her.

 


12

Posted by mancinblack on Fri, 01 Jun 2018 20:13 | #

Hananya Naftali was appointed Benjamin Netanyahu’s “deputy social media adviser” in April. Naftali describes himself as “a Jew who loves Jesus” (don’t they all?)

https://www.jpost.com/Israel-News/Politics-And-Diplomacy/From-praising-Jesus-to-tweeting-Bibi-PMs-new-recruit-has-colorful-past-552612

A few days ago Mr Naftali deleted Tweets from his feed in support of Tommy Robinson - “Free Tommy Robinson” (with every pack of Krembo?*) he Tweeted. “He has done nothing wrong and it is right to express his freedom of speech #FreeTommy #FreeTommyRobinson”. However, earlier Tweets, dating from March, in support of Robinson remain on his feed.
*Krembo’s are a popular Israeli treat, similar to what we call a chocolate teacake.


13

Posted by Bibi's Christian Zionist Media Evangel on Sat, 02 Jun 2018 09:22 | #

Jerusalem Post, “From praising Jesus to tweeting Bibi, PM’s new recruit has colorful past”, 24 April 2018:

Controversy surrounds Netanyahu’s new social media staffer.


Hananya Naftali. (photo credit: FACEBOOK SCREENSHOT)

Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu’s new deputy social media adviser Hananya Naftali is a popular Israel advocate online, served in the Armored Corps, fought Hamas in Operation Protective Edge, and calls himself a Jew who loves Jesus.

Naftali was hired by Netanyahu’s social media adviser Topaz Luk, who says he “hired a superstar.”

Naftali will assist Luk in running Netanyahu’s social media networks.

Naftali has recently posted videos of himself defending Israel’s policies on the Gaza Strip and criticizing the United Nations and the leadership of the Palestinian Authority. But Naftali’s posts about his religious faith have raised eyebrows.

In one video, he calls himself “a Christian.” In another, he says that both his parents are Jewish, and he denied charges that he converted soldiers in the army, which were raised after he posted in January 2014 that on a weekend in the IDF he “read the Bible and shared Jesus.”

“I am not part of any cult,” he said in the video. “I’m not part of the messianic Judaism denomination.

In fact, I am not part of any denomination. I am just a normal guy who made his own decision to follow Jesus.”

Blogs online have posted tweets in which the bloggers said Naftali identified as a messianic Jew, but were since deleted.

Luk described Naftali as “a full Jew on both sides, who respects Christians who love Israel and do so much to strengthen Israel.”

“This is the main thing,” he said.

Luk denied reports that all the social media staff of Netanyahu got their jobs because they were friends with Netanyahu’s son Yair. Luk said he served in the IDF Spokesperson’s Unit with Yair Netanyahu, but that neither Naftali nor Jonathan Urich, who handles the prime minister’s personal social media, had ties with Yair.

“Everyone is in his position because of his talents,” he added.


14

Posted by mancinblack on Sat, 02 Jun 2018 12:31 | #

Who in their right mind would name their son Topaz?

“I thought I told you to name the boy after the mensch who played Tevye in Fiddler on the Roof?”
“That’s what I did - Topaz”
“It’s Topol you schmuck TOPOL”

Topaz Luk sounds like a synth-pop band from the 80’s. “Topaz Luk on tour with Depeche Mode” sounds about right (lol)


15

Posted by ROTHERHAM on Sun, 10 Jun 2018 22:09 | #

ROTHERHAM

MJOLNIR, Saturday, 9 June 2018

My latest video is from Rotherham, the town made famous for the rape of 1,400 young girls by Muslims over a 15-year period, which was covered up by the British state and police. I also look at the case of Tommy Robinson, formerly of the EDL, and the difference between him and the unsung hero who actually brought the scandal to light, Marlene Guest of the BNP. I also talk about the army of Tommytards who have tried to railroad the comments section here by posting abuse, disinformation and libel. Please note: all comments go straight into moderation and any that are misleading, abusive or libellous get hit with the delete button. That means you will waste several minutes of your time on nothing. I see there is now a collection fund to donate to, organised by Tommy Robinson’s Zionist handlers. This will go to the same Zionists putting restrictions on White European freedoms through litigation and bureaucracy, and the irony of Tommytards whining about Robinson being falsely imprisoned because of state infringements on free speech seems to be lost on most people. Anyone of White European extraction donating to the fund must be considered a buffoon and a fool.

One of the comments I had that I deleted was about Tommy Robinson’s mortgage fraud case. Again, the commenter made up some garbage to exonerate dear little Tommy, who can do no wrong. Robinson was actually running the fraud for a certain Deborah Rothschild - that’s right, ROTHSCHILD! Click the link here for the BBC article. Case closed, folks. This will be the last article on Stephen Yaxley-Lennon, as he should not be worth this much interest. Don’t forget to buy his book, Tommytards….

David Yorkshire10 June 2018 at 09:32

I ended up having to make a second video on Tommy Robinson after all:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=r6dA7aXnCpw&t=4s

 


16

Posted by Ezra & Tommy on Thu, 28 Jun 2018 22:03 | #

Further proof Tommy Robinson is a fraud:

https://www.counter-currents.com/2018/06/further-proof-tommy-robinson-is-a-fraud/


17

Posted by FreeTommy rallies orchestrated by YKW on Sat, 14 Jul 2018 09:40 | #

Diverstiy Macht Frei, “The FreeTommy rallies are orchestrated and funded by Jews”, 13 July 2018:


Jew Daniel Pipes surveys with approval the protest he has paid for

On 14 July, there will be another FreeTommy rally in London. If you watched the last one, you may have wondered how they could afford that big screen where Lauren Southern’s face appeared so fetchingly, with yearning eyes, like a cam girl ready to give her client an imaginary blowjob.

Wonder no more. It is now admitted that these protests are orchestrated and funded by Jews.

The Middle East Forum (MEF) is helping Robinson in his moment of danger. It does so in the context of its Legal Project which since 2007 has defended activists, journalists, politicians, et al. who face harassment, fines, or imprisonment because of their views concerning Islamism and related topics.

MEF is sponsoring and organizing the second “Free Tommy Robinson” gathering in London on July 14. MEF previously provided all the funding and helped organized the first “Free Tommy Robinson” event held June 9 in London.

MEF, along with a coalition of UK advocacy groups and international figures will assemble to advocate for Mr. Robinson’s release and demand greater protections for freedom of speech and freedom of the press in the United Kingdom. MEF is arranging for U.S. Congressman Paul Gosar (Republican of Arizona) to travel to London to speak alongside the Dutch political leader Geert Wilders, and others.

The Middle East Forum is a Zionist outfit run by the Jew Daniel Pipes.

The Middle East Forum is aiding Mr. Robinson’s defense in three main ways:

- Legally – By using Legal Project monies to fund his legal defense.

- Diplomatically – By bringing foreign pressure on the UK government to ensure Mr. Robinson’s safety and eventual release.

- Politically – By organizing and funding the 25,000-person “Free Tommy” London rally on June 9 and now the July 14 protest, also taking place in London.

Note the “diplomatically”. It’s almost as if those conspiracy theories about a powerful cabal of international Jews had some basis in fact. (See Addendum below for more on this)

Pipes has recently been on a trip to Europe where he reviewed the various “far-right” and “far-lite” parties for possible kosher certification. Political kosher certification now apparently has a new name: “Civilizationism”.

An initial problem is how correctly to name them in general. The media lazily lumps these parties together as far-right, ignoring their frequent leftist elements, especially in economic and social policy. Calling them nationalist is wrong, for they neither bellow calls to arms nor raise claims to neighbors’ lands. Populist misses the point because plenty of populist parties such as La France Insoumise (Rebellious France) pursue nearly opposite policies.

Best is to focus on their key common elements: rejecting the vast influx of immigrants and especially Muslim immigrants. Non-Muslim immigrants also cause strains, especially those from Africa, but only among Muslims does one find a program, the Islamist one, to replace Western civilization with a radically different way of life. Turned around, these parties are traditionalists with a pro-Christendom, pro-European and pro-Western outlook; they are civilizationist. (This definition also has the benefit of excluding parties like the neo-Nazi Golden Dawn in Greece, that despise traditional Western civilization.)

Enlightened opinion generally reacts with horror to civilizationist parties, and not without reason, for they carry a lot of baggage. Some have dubious origins. Staffed mainly by angry political novices, they feature dismaying numbers of anti-Jewish and anti-Muslim extremists, Nazi nostalgists, power-hungry cranks, economic eccentrics, historical revisionists, and conspiracy theorists. Some proffer anti-democratic, anti-European Union, and anti-American outlooks. Far too many – and especially Orbán – have a soft spot for Russian dictator Vladimir Putin.

But civilizationist parties also bring critical benefits to the political arena: realism, courage, tenacity, and a civilizational critique necessary if the West is to survive in its historic form. Therefore, contrary to many friends and allies, I favor working with most civilizationist parties, advocating critical co-operation rather than rejection and marginalization.

Source

The claim that Golden Dawn, defender of Greece, the cradle of western civilisation, rejects “traditional western civilisation” is, of course, absurd, unless Jewish control over the goyim is now considered a “traditional” part of our civilisation.

But it seems kosher certification will now be available for far-lite parties that meet the strict ritual requirements: acceptance of the Holocult, trips to Yad Vashem, support for Israel, pro forma denunciations of “anti-Semitism”, and a resolute refusal to ask how it is that the catastrophe currently engulfing us came to be.

Unfortunately, most of what passes for Europe’s political patriots will be happy to meet these Semitic demands.

So watch the #FreeTommy rally by all means. Just remember who is pulling the strings behind it.

Addendum: Reuters reports that the “US Ambassador for Religious Freedom,” Sam Brownback, lobbied the British government about the Tommy Robinson case.

Brownback raised the case of the activist known as Tommy Robinson in a June meeting with Sir Kim Darroch, Britain’s Ambassador to the United States, according to a British official and two sources close to the organizers of a pro-Robinson demonstration planned for London on Saturday.

  …Brownback raised the jailing of Robinson during a meeting with Darroch that covered a range of “religious freedom issues”, the British official confirmed earlier this week.

Brownback told Darroch that if Britain did not treat Robinson more sympathetically, the Trump administration might be compelled to criticize Britain’s handling of the case, according to the two sources in contact with organizers of the planned pro-Robinson demonstration.

Source

Daniel Pipes interviewed Sam Brownback for the Middle East Quarterly in 1997, so the two men have known each other for a long time. They also served in the “Jerusalem Summit” together.

Along with noted neoconservative ideologue Daniel Pipes, Brownback has served on the presidium of the Jerusalem Summit, a now largely defunct Israel-based advocacy outfit that brought together evangelicals, neoconservatives, and hardline pro-Israel figures from across the globe in an effort to shape the debate over the status of Palestine, militant Muslim groups, and other hot-button Mideast issues.

Source

Upon his appointment as “Ambassador for Religious Freedom”, the Times of Israel noted of Brownback that he had a “long history of cooperation with the Jewish community on religious freedom issues.”

Brownback, a staunch conservative, has had a close relationship with the gamut of Jewish communal organizations. While in the Senate, he chaired the US Helsinki Commission, the parliamentary body that monitors human rights abuses, and was outspoken in identifying anti-Semitism overseas. He was one of the leading pro-Israel voices in the Senate and an early advocate of expanded sanctions targeting Iran. He made support for Israel a central plank of his short run for president in the 2008 race.

Source


18

Posted by "Dracula", "Bully" and "Beastie" on Sat, 20 Oct 2018 15:48 | #

Voice of Europe, “Mostly Muslim grooming gang jailed for raping 15 British girls as young as 11”, 20 Oct 2018:


The men, all from Yorkshire, went by nicknames including “Dracula”, “Bully”, “Beastie” and “Nurse”

Censorship measures have now been lifted regarding the trials of the 20 mostly Muslim, Pakistani child rapists in Huddersfield, who have now been jailed.

The gang, which undertook a “campaign of rape and other sexual abuse” of vulnerable young girls, regularly gave their victims drink and drugs, threatening and sometimes actually abandoning the girls on the moors if the children did not do as they wanted.

Leeds Crown Court heard how one of the girls the men raped went on to give birth, another had an abortion, and one attempted suicide as a result of the abuse, The Times reports.

The juries heard from 15 women, the majority of whom are white, about the atrocities commit against them by these men between 2004 and 2011. They were aged between 11 and 17 at the time of the abuse, their lives forever changed.

All but two of the child rapists were of Pakistani heritage, two were Sikh but the rest were Muslims. It is speculated that political correctness and fears of being called ‘racist’ kept police and authorities from acting when incidents were being reported to them throughout the years.

Reporting of the case was blocked after Tommy Robinson read the details of the case, which were online at the time and still are, but the censorship was lifted when a legal challenge was brought by a group of media organisations.

Other similar cases of Muslim child rape gangs have been uncovered in Rotherham, Newcastle, Telford and Oxford, where hundreds if not thousands of young girls – children – being raped, sexually assaulted, used as prostitutes, trafficked and exploited over several decades.

Media has shifted the focus from the rapists’ ideology – namely Islam – to a generalised race -namely Asian. This is considered offensive to non-Muslim Asians, who have typically not been found the majority in rape gangs such as this. The effect has caused people to not report on cases for fear of being labelled ‘racist’, when in fact, it is their ideology which should now be being scrutinised.

The list of the men and their charges and sentencing is as follows:

Dhaliwal was convicted of 54 offences against 11 victims. He was found guilty of 22 rapes, including the rape of a child under 13, sexual assault, inciting a child to engage in sexual activity, prostitution, trafficking, drug dealing, and beating.

The ‘Kid’ Mohammed Akram, 31, was convicted of rape, abduction, sexual assault, trafficking. He is yet to be sentenced.

Raj Singh Barsran, 34, was convicted of rape and sexual assault and jailed for 17 years.

‘Dracula’ Nahman Mohammed, 30, was convicted of rape and trafficking and jailed for 17 years.

‘Junior’ Asif Bashir, 32, was convicted of rape and sexual activity with a child. He is yet to be sentenced.

‘Shaw’ Niaz Ahmed, 53, nicknamed Shaw, is yet to be jailed but was convicted of sexual assault, inciting a child into sexual activity.

‘Beastie’ Abdul Rehman, 31, was convicted of rape, supplying a controlled drug of class B, ABH and trafficking, and jailed for 16 years.

‘Bully’ Mohammed Imran Ibrar, 32, was convicted of trafficking and ABH but is yet to be sentenced.

‘Little Manny’ Zahid Hassan, 29, was convicted of rape, attempted rape, trafficking, supplying a controlled drug of Class A, sexual activity with a child, abduction of a child and racially aggravated assault. He was jailed for 18 years.

‘Big Riz’ Mohammed Rizwan Aslam, 30, was convicted for 15 years for rape.

‘Finny’ Irfan Ahmed, 33, was jailed for eight years for sexual activity with a child and sexual exploitation.

‘Big Manny’ Manzoor Hassan, 38, was jailed for five years for supplying class A drugs.

Sajid Hussain, 33, nicknamed ‘Fish’ was jailed for 17 years for rape.

‘Mosabella’ Mohammed Azeem, 32, was convicted of rape and jailed for 18 years.

‘Boy’ Mansoor Akhtar, 27, was jailed for eight years for rape of a child under the age of 13 and trafficking.

Nasarat Hussain, 30, nicknamed ‘Nurse’, was jailed for 17 years for rape and sexual assault.

Wiqas Mahmud, 37, nicknamed ‘Vic’, was jailed for 15 years for rape.

Mohammed Irfraz, 30, nicknamed ‘Faj’, was jailed for six years for the abduction of a child and trafficking.

‘Chiller’ Faisal Nadeem, 31, was jailed for 12 years for rape and supplying a class A drug.


19

Posted by Nigel Farage on Wed, 05 Dec 2018 06:26 | #

Nigel Farage Quits UKIP Over Tommy Robinson Appointment


20

Posted by Tommy Robinson's crew on Wed, 31 Jul 2019 15:56 | #

Mark Collett smeared by Tommy Robinson’s crew


21

Posted by Collett & "Secret Sources" on Tommy Robinson on Wed, 11 Dec 2019 23:53 | #

Collett & “Secret Sources” on Tommy Robinson


22

Posted by Tommy Fraudulence on Fri, 14 Feb 2020 19:51 | #

Tommy Robinson fake news story debunked by Belmarsh Prison governor



Post a comment:


Name: (required)

Email: (required but not displayed)

URL: (optional)

Note: You should copy your comment to the clipboard or paste it somewhere before submitting it, so that it will not be lost if the session times out.

Remember me


Next entry: The Trial of Jeremy Bedford-Turner, May, 2018
Previous entry: “Philip Cross” Affair Reveals Jewish Lobby’s Editing of Wikipedia

image of the day

Existential Issues

DNA Nations

Establishment Problem

Categories

Contributors

Each author's name links to a list of all articles posted by the writer.

Links

Endorsement not implied.

Immigration

Islamist Threat

Anti-white Media Networks

Audio/Video

Crime

Economics

Education

General

Historical Re-Evaluation

Controlled Opposition

Nationalist Political Parties

Science

Europeans in Africa

Of Note

Comments

Al Ross commented in entry 'Moscow's Bataclan' on Thu, 28 Mar 2024 05:37. (View)

Thorn commented in entry 'Moscow's Bataclan' on Tue, 26 Mar 2024 15:07. (View)

Thorn commented in entry 'Moscow's Bataclan' on Tue, 26 Mar 2024 11:00. (View)

Al Ross commented in entry 'Moscow's Bataclan' on Tue, 26 Mar 2024 05:02. (View)

Thorn commented in entry 'Moscow's Bataclan' on Mon, 25 Mar 2024 11:39. (View)

Al Ross commented in entry 'Out of foundation and into the mind-body problem, part four' on Mon, 25 Mar 2024 09:56. (View)

Al Ross commented in entry 'Moscow's Bataclan' on Mon, 25 Mar 2024 07:51. (View)

Al Ross commented in entry 'Moscow's Bataclan' on Mon, 25 Mar 2024 07:46. (View)

Al Ross commented in entry 'Moscow's Bataclan' on Mon, 25 Mar 2024 07:41. (View)

Thorn commented in entry 'Moscow's Bataclan' on Sun, 24 Mar 2024 12:25. (View)

Guessedworker commented in entry 'Moscow's Bataclan' on Sun, 24 Mar 2024 00:42. (View)

Thorn commented in entry 'Moscow's Bataclan' on Sat, 23 Mar 2024 22:01. (View)

Thorn commented in entry 'Moscow's Bataclan' on Sat, 23 Mar 2024 21:20. (View)

Guessedworker commented in entry 'Moscow's Bataclan' on Sat, 23 Mar 2024 20:51. (View)

Guessedworker commented in entry 'Moscow's Bataclan' on Sat, 23 Mar 2024 20:45. (View)

Thorn commented in entry 'Moscow's Bataclan' on Sat, 23 Mar 2024 17:26. (View)

Manc commented in entry 'Moscow's Bataclan' on Sat, 23 Mar 2024 15:56. (View)

Thorn commented in entry 'Moscow's Bataclan' on Sat, 23 Mar 2024 14:55. (View)

Guessedworker commented in entry 'Moscow's Bataclan' on Sat, 23 Mar 2024 14:07. (View)

Thorn commented in entry 'Moscow's Bataclan' on Sat, 23 Mar 2024 13:12. (View)

Thorn commented in entry 'Moscow's Bataclan' on Sat, 23 Mar 2024 12:51. (View)

Thorn commented in entry 'Out of foundation and into the mind-body problem, part four' on Sat, 23 Mar 2024 12:38. (View)

Guessedworker commented in entry 'Moscow's Bataclan' on Sat, 23 Mar 2024 10:01. (View)

Al Ross commented in entry 'Out of foundation and into the mind-body problem, part four' on Sat, 23 Mar 2024 05:13. (View)

Thorn commented in entry 'Out of foundation and into the mind-body problem, part four' on Fri, 22 Mar 2024 23:51. (View)

Thorn commented in entry 'Out of foundation and into the mind-body problem, part four' on Thu, 21 Mar 2024 11:14. (View)

Al Ross commented in entry 'Out of foundation and into the mind-body problem, part four' on Thu, 21 Mar 2024 05:14. (View)

Thorn commented in entry 'Out of foundation and into the mind-body problem, part four' on Tue, 19 Mar 2024 11:42. (View)

Al Ross commented in entry 'Out of foundation and into the mind-body problem, part four' on Tue, 19 Mar 2024 11:01. (View)

Thorn commented in entry 'Out of foundation and into the mind-body problem, part four' on Tue, 19 Mar 2024 10:41. (View)

Al Ross commented in entry 'Out of foundation and into the mind-body problem, part four' on Tue, 19 Mar 2024 10:21. (View)

Al Ross commented in entry 'Out of foundation and into the mind-body problem, part four' on Tue, 19 Mar 2024 09:50. (View)

Al Ross commented in entry 'Out of foundation and into the mind-body problem, part four' on Tue, 19 Mar 2024 09:13. (View)

Al Ross commented in entry 'Out of foundation and into the mind-body problem, part four' on Tue, 19 Mar 2024 06:26. (View)

Al Ross commented in entry 'Out of foundation and into the mind-body problem, part four' on Tue, 19 Mar 2024 06:09. (View)

affection-tone