Ethnic intellectual property theft and the decline of civilizations

Posted by James Bowery on Wednesday, 12 July 2006 19:57.

Speaking recently to a Congressional representative about immigration policy, I tried to explain the problem in terms he could understand. I related to him my own experience at the Hewlett-Packard E-Speak project, a project that absorbed $500M of risk capital from the founding company of Silicon Valley during the peak of the dot-con bubble.

I had to threaten to resign in order to hire a specialist in the area I was investigating: relation arithmetic. The problem was that I was not allowed to hire the specialist, despite his unique qualifications but I was offered the option of hiring all the Indians under H-1b visas that I wanted. We can ignore the fact that this is blatently illegal and even an inversion of law (H-1b visas are supposed to be used only for people who are uniquely qualified—the opposite of excluding natives who are uniquely qualified). The really important lesson here is it runs counter to the myth promulgated by “cognitive elites” that the H-1b program is admitting to the West the cream of the crop of Asia, and any resistance is irrational racism/nativism/protectionism/xenophobia, etc.

Please NOTE: Here we had not just some marginal example, but the largest single investment in the dot-con era under the control of a cabal of Indians importing their coethnics to the founding company of Silicon Valley. They relented and allowed my hire temporarily until it was time to have another anglo get rid of the both of us. The E-Speak project folded after putting a stream of Indians on the road to HP-funded MBAs, law degrees and green cards in the US. I guess since we were able to make some headway in correcting a key flaw in Principia Mathematica with profound implications and applications, the project wasn’t a total waste. The problem though is we now have this residal population running around eating up the Fortune 1000’s information technology and freezing out the men whose inventiveness founded the information industry.

The Congressman was visibly shaken and immediately went into a rationalization: “If we don’t let them come here the companies will send their work overseas. So I can’t really oppose H-1b expansion.” This ignores what I was saying—that not only is this a threat to our entire civilization, gutting the source of technology through displacement, but it imports the world’s problems to make them our own.

He of course receives large donations from men like Bill Gates who want all H-1b caps removed so he wasn’t impressed by the fact that the companies more intensely importing H-1b “technologists” are having the most trouble, and that it is perhaps preferrable to let those “jobs” go over seas since when the companies, indulging in this betrayal of the technologists that built them, go out of business, their pollution won’t be left hanging around inside our borders to further the process of decay for the Fortune 1000 and the economy in general.

It was far too much to ask such a Congressman just as it is too much to ask men who aspire to be new Disraelis to realize how destructive they are being to their home countries. They’re blinded by their own greed and lust for power. They are not responsible for their own actions—and should be treated accordingly.

But what of the basic problem? How has this situation come about and how can it be prevented in the future?

The problem is in the very nature of scientific knowledge. Science is defined by reproducibility. If it is reproducible outside the kin-group then, as W. D. Hamilton points out:

Often, however, the cost in fitness of such altruism and sublimated pugnacity to the individuals concerned is by no means metaphorical, and the benefits to fitness, such as they are, go to a mass of individuals whose genetic correlation with the innovator must be slight indeed. Thus civilization probably slowly reduces its altruism of all kinds, including the kinds needed for cultural creativity (see also Eshel 1972).

This used to be somewhat protected by differing languages, but of course one of the first attributes acquired by a mobile mercantile culture is facility in foreign language acquisition. About the only thing you can do is keep out the merchants and anthropologists and appear to all to be a primitive people wielding stone-age technologies—while, somehow, all who threaten to invade seem to drop like flies or seem just to do something else more “interesting”.

People like Disraeli who run around forcing billions of foreign people to speak your native tounge are perhaps the worst sort of traitor to a creative nation.

Tags:

Comments:

Posted by On Holliday on Wed, 12 Jul 2006 21:17 | #

“Please NOTE: Here we had not just some marginal example, but the largest single investment in the dot-con era under the control of a cabal of Indians importing their coethnics to the founding company of Silicon Valley.”

This of course underscores one major flaw of Sailer’s “citizenism” - that minority groups such as South Asians will relentlessly practice ethnic nepotism (while telling whites that such activity [as practiced by whites] is “not adaptive”), while whites are to practice aracial “citizenism.”

Those who object to “tribalism” had better get a grip on the immigration situation - not only to decry illegal Hispanic immigration, but legal Asian immigration as well.

Posted by James Bowery on Wed, 12 Jul 2006 22:18 | #

There is a tendency among the immigration restrictionist crowd to favor the H-1b visa program due to the same factors that render people silent on the Jewish question: You’re income potential is cut sometimes severely. Guys like Brimelow and Sailer, men with children to raise and a shoe-string income, look at guys like me speaking out openly and honestly without guile and see what happens practically speaking and it is hardly emboldening. This situation will only get worse, as it did with Jews occupying more and more positions of trust and authority.

Posted by John S Bolton on Thu, 13 Jul 2006 08:05 | #

The technology transfer, and tolerance of espionage, which is facilitated by traitorous immigration policies, is causing huge damage.
There have been no great technical or theoretical breakthroughs here since the initial surge of these prodiversity policies in the 1960’s.
If the reward of breakthroughs does not go to the population which supports the conditions in which such may arise, they must stop.
At the same time, America is too important a center for what innovation does go on still, to become too closed to foreign meritorious of great rarity.
H1B’s are almost never in that category.
I would like to see an all-merit immigration policy; but only for countries which are not hostile or non-aligned. That is, one in which merit is a single standard after the national security need to avoid espionage, terrorism and disadvantageous technology transfer is taken care of.
There must be no children or relatives waved-in to accompany those adults who score in the top 1% of English-language conceptual ability. This way you get almost all men, whose effect on reproduction is limited by what women here can be impressed with.

Posted by James Bowery on Thu, 13 Jul 2006 17:29 | #

The problem with admitting exceptions is that the H-1b program was supposed to operate the way you say—so as to allow just the most exceptional people through the visa gate with no relatives etc.—but it seems the ethnic nepotism urge is so strong that the very exceptional nature of those let through becomes a scourge: they go straight to the top and open the flood gates for their coethnics.

I think the fundamental problem comes from the way people who have too much time on their hands and not enough creative juice tend to create political structures controlling those who have the creativity but—as a result of application—no time to politick for control over their own destiny. This then creates a society that rips off creators as a matter of course and can then not defend itself when more virulent parasites from abroad show up and win the virulence game.

Posted by ben tillman on Mon, 17 Jul 2006 03:53 | #

That story doesn’t surprise me at all, nor do I find it irrational. You can perfectly well object to H1B programs on the grounds that they’re robbing the Indian taxpayer, who has paid for these bozos, mostly much richer than him, to have expensive educations only so they can goof off to California and do nothing to help the Indian economy. It is economically a subsidy from Indian taxpayers to US tech shareholders, which makes no moral sense and has to be damaging to global wealth maximisation in the long run.

That is often overlooked. The purported benefits of immigration amount to the externalization of the cost of rearing and educating Third-Worlders with three-digit IQ’s.

Posted by Kevin Lynn's anti-H1b campaign on Mon, 26 Mar 2018 17:42 | #

Stark Truth Radio, “Robert Stark talks to Kevin Lynn about

His Add Campaign against H-1B Visas on SF’s BART”, 26 Mar 2018:

Kevin Lynn is Director of Progressives for Immigration Reform which is sponsoring adds against the H-1B Visa Program on the Bay Area’s BART System.

Topics:

Bay Area Campaign Targets H-1B Visas, Asks Congress to Fix on Americans’ Behalf

The campaign’s message, “Your companies think you are expensive, undeserving & expendable. Congress, fix H-1B law so companies must seek & hire U.S. workers!”

Bay Area media responses including the San Jose Mercury News which first reported on the campaign

The overall reaction from tech workers was positive but with hesitations due to fear of backlash

The goal of the campaign is to to foster a movement to unite tech workers politically against exploitation

How for every two students who graduate with STEM degrees, only one is hired into a STEM job

How Foreign workers account for about 70 percent of the tech workforce in the Bay Area

H-1B Visas as Indentured Servitude

The myth of innovation from H-1B workers

Fearing H-1B Tightening, Tech Giants Ramp Up Lobbying

How Trump has accomplished very little on immigration

The impact of immigration on the environment and carbon footprints

Posted by F-I (student) visas & Chinese spying on Sat, 23 May 2020 10:59 | #

#MalkinLive: Lurking Giants, F-I visas & Chinese infiltration of U.S. academia

912 views Streamed live on May 13, 2020

Michelle Malkin
39.5K subscribers

Michelle interviews investigative journalist Michele McPhee about her work exposing Chinese spy scandals in America’s colleges and universities.