Nick Griffin and Mark Collett

Posted by Guessedworker on January 16, 2006, 10:42 PM | #

The BBC - which was, via its Secret Agent programme, deeply complicit in the bringing of a prosecution against the BNP pair - plainly and unequivocally declared for the Crown in its coverage today.

The propaganda tone is all there in the headline, “BNP boss race case sparks protest”.  The BNP does not have a leader, like a normal political party, but “a boss”.  A political gangster, no doubt.

The protest which was “sparked” wasn’t sparked in any genuine, spontaneous way at all.  It was organised by the vilely dishonest Marxist front, Unite Against Fascism.  How many race industry workers, union activists and far left students they managed to attract we cannot know because the BBC under-reported the BNP demonstration by about 50%.

Most disgustingly of all, the UAF people were handing out propaganda leaftlets to potyential jurors, bearing the headline, “Guilty as Charged”.  The judge expressed rather mild dissatisfaction, requesting the UAF to cease this interference.  The BBC records the fact neutrally, not mentioning who handed out the leaflets and who, therefore, occurred the judge’s opprobrium.

Likewise the arrests - reported by the BBC at 5, the BNP at 7 - were of UAF rowdies.  This fact the BBC also manages not to mention.

Posted by Tania on January 16, 2006, 10:43 PM | #

And yet those live in the Western world, speak out against it and incite much more hatred, are protected in the name of tolerating the minorities.

Not only should these two get off, they should never have been charged. Supressing our own free speach against these matters will only serve to weaken us.

Posted by Svyatoslav Igorevich on January 18, 2006, 03:24 AM | #

How many race industry workers, union activists and far left students they managed to attract we cannot know because the BBC under-reported the BNP demonstration by about 50%.

Anyone with a brain in his head would entertain that notion; only the pro-BNPers carrying signs get counted, passers-by get counted as anti-BNP, etc.  That’s all par for the course with the mass media.

If that’s too sketchy for you, how about an out-and-out lie by omission?

http://politics.guardian.co.uk/farright/story/0,,1688388,00.html
BNP leader ‘warned of multiracial hell hole’

Yesterday some 600 rival protesters massed outside the courthouse; today there were only a handful of protesters.

Where have the “150” pro-BNP protestors gone?  Poof!  They vanished.

Note carefully the actual lie: the lie that underpins the mass media’s perceived legitimacy* - “we’re impartial reporters of the relevant facts.”

*a perception that is steadily declining in popularity, thank God.

Posted by ben tillman on January 18, 2006, 05:11 AM | #

How many race industry workers, union activists and far left students they managed to attract we cannot know....

Let’s not unfairly malign labor unions.  No genuine union activist could support immigration, regardless of racial dynamics.  They would try to restrict the labor market, as did Cesar Chavez in opposing the immigration of Mexican competitors.  What you refer to as union activists are activists with another agenda. 

Ostensible labor unions in Canada were similarly involved in effecting government policies designed to effect the genocide of the native white population:

http://www.historycooperative.org/journals/llt/47/03lamber.html

Posted by friedrich braun on January 20, 2006, 03:18 AM | #

It seems that the BBC is about as trustworthy a source of news as the Pravda was during the Brezhnew era.

Posted by Marc Ward on January 31, 2006, 10:15 PM | #

Bnp are only getting stronger with this bogus trial. Press has travelled around the globe, as this is cleary a violation of freedom of speach. Also questions about the BBC’s invlovement, as the BBC is a government run broadcasting company, ultimately governed by the Labour party.