Actually, I think I’d bet money that they’ll reintroduce the prosecution, indeed Cameron is probably at this moment on the phone encouraging them to do so.  The establishment needs to keep the BNP both focused on race an un-respectable, otherwise there’s a chance it will escape from the Alf Garnett ghetto it currently inhabits and start winning a serious percentage of the vote.

Traditional BNP/NF strategy has assumed their main support base will be the most unreconstructed bits of the working class, so they need to run on populist (i.e. more or less Socialist) working class economics.  With all 3 parties heading left, there is now a huge opportunity to expand their market rapidly, but it will require an economically literate policy mix in order to attract disaffected Tories.  The marooned-by-Cameron element is huge and new; BNP nereds to change to meet this opportunity.

Fighting off the Crown Prosecution Service over and over again will prevent them seizing this chance, which is why I think the CPS will re-prosecute.

Bloody good news. A second trial will, obviously, further undermine confidence the larger public has in the judicial system.

I see that Times article reports:-

A CPS spokeswoman later announced that they would proceed with a retrial for both defendants on the outstanding charges. “The CPS has decided that we will go for a re-trial in the cases of Griffin and Collett,” she said.

This may be seen as a rather hasty decision by the CPS’s political masters.  Perhaps the CPS minions haven’t consulted them yet.  They should.

Of course, they do have other pressing concerns:-

The first of a series of events focused on strengthening the CPS’ commitment to engagement with Muslim communities takes place next year in Cardiff.

Further events are planned for 2006.

Area and HQ representatives, along with Equality and Diversity Unit (EDU) staff, are participating in the events to discuss key issues such as:

* the prosecution of terrorist cases
* racially and religiously aggravated cases
* the prosecution of incitement to racial hatred cases and the latest proposals by Government.

Whatever the CPS decided about the BNP boys, the Party will continue to be targeted by the Establishment.  We see in Flanders that Conservatives and Socialists alike assault Vlaams Belang in whatever way they can.  Vlaams Blok was killed administratively, and it would be wrong to think that the apparatus to do the same with the BNP does not exist, at least in outline.

This BBC News article from 5th May 2002 makes the point concisely.

The three British National Party councillors elected in Burnley could be banned from taking part in council meetings if they pursue a racist agenda.

Local government minister Nick Raynsford said the councillors who gained seats in Thursday’s local election were subject to the councillor’s code of conduct.

It demands that all constituents are treated “in an equal and fair way”.

... If the BNP councillors break the code, they face censor by the Standards Board of England, which has powers including censorship and banning organisations for up to five years.

According to the repellant “United Against Fascism” fanatics, the Standards Board of England & Wales declared the BNP to be a Nazi party last year.  That sounds faintly ridiculous for such a sober body as the SBEW.  Here, anyway, are its various codes as they are cast today (pdf).

With our own right to free speech under daily attack, it is heartening and refreshing to see that you folks across “the pond” can still stop the PC lunacy.

Cheers

‘Liberty’ (formerly the National Council for Civil Liberties) used to be a genuine libertarian organisation, but it has been increasingly taken over by the PC thought police.  It no longer shows much interest in anything other than ‘human rights’ for ethnic minorities.

Check out the Director of Liberty

Shami Chakrabarti - funny, doesnt sound like a British name, still I’m sure she has our best interests at heart.

That video was disturbing. What, I wonder, were the epithets bleeped. If they were overtly racist it would be dynamite.

The media, however, has been presented with a better bone to chew ... that of a psychopathic “neo-Nazi" teenager who shot dead two members of a sacred minority.

Perhaps it is the intention in some Psychobabble way to condition kids indirectly to such doctrines. Meaning they continually suppress, Label and denigrate any form of Anglo existence, and blur normality to a point, even the most sane people eventually snap and reach for what was considered to be a reference point, and in this instance it is the Nazi doctrine. As it is perceived by the Left, that Hitler was a pro White, and that is the image many people wrongly grasp for. I almost vision it as a deliberate ploy in some other direction of leftist Ideology to achieve their goal. Reverse psychology perhaps?

He then drew a gun and began firing in the pink-walled venue, according to police and witnesses.—lol this just cracked me up.

Geoff, Negroes in this country hate Mexicans even more than they hate whites.  In fact, they have sort of a love-hate relationship with whites, while for Mexicans they have nothing but hatred.  The Negro rank-and-file in this country absolutely oppose the Bush/Rove plan to change the country racially from white to Mexican in order to please their Wall-Street and Big-Business-&-Industry backers.  The Negro rank-and-file can’t STAND what’s going on.  But their political leaders refuse to listen to them, exactly as ours refuse to listen to us.  Wall Street’s got both sets of leaders bought-and-paid-for (except for a few outfits with the integrity to refuse bribes, such as Tancredo’s hundred-member-strong Immigration Reform Caucus in the House). 

Wall Street wants U.S. whites replaced with Mexican peasants as the nation’s main non-élite racial population because white people demand too much in wages.  And Wall Street wants U.S. Negroes replaced with Mexicans because the latter make better workers than the former (harder-working, work more intelligently, are less sullen and more docile than Negroes, and will also work for lower wages than both U.S. Negroes and whites have come to expect). 

Wall Street badly wants these transformations and will not give up its campaign of pushing race-replacement until it gets them.  (Did you know that Tom DeLay was one of the Congressmen bought-and-paid-for by the Wall-Street race-replacers and completely in their pocket, doing all of their bidding?  When I learned that recently, it surprised the hell out of me.)

To glimpse the broad outlines of what Wall Street is aiming for race-replacement-wise, look at this Ed Rubenstein piece up today over at Vdare.com:

“Such wage declines will grow over time, and not merely because more immigrants are constantly coming in. A 2003 study [PDF] by economists at the Atlanta Federal Reserve Bank found that immigrants who are in the country longer and who upgrade their legal status—getting a green card or similar documentation—have more of a negative impact on low-skilled native workers than do newly arrived immigrants.  This suggests that, even if immigration were stopped, George Bush’s guest worker proposal would greatly accelerate the fall in native living standards.”

What Wall Street is after is those last few words in that excerpt:  a fall in native living standards.  They want to break the back of the wage-level expectations which white people in general have come to have.  And with the help of traitors like George Bush and Bill Clinton they’re rapidly getting what they want.

Fred, it can be summed up succintly:

We feed’m, they breed’m