Not only Peckham?

MR commenter Gongstar posted a link to a BBC Radio 4 documentary which, as he says, is worth a listen. Somewhat ironically from our point of view, it is titled Peckham’s Lost.

That title actually refers to the abject failure of innumerable government thaumaturgies to save the younger generation of black “South Londoners” from themselves. It is a 40-minute investigation of feral black youth in Peckham, scene of some particularly savage, recent black-on-black lethality.

The programme is an unintended study in SSA sociobiological traits. The liberal white female reporter Winifred Robinson could never bring herself to connect the shameful, Rushtonian dots. But she unerringly emphasises enough of them to enable anyone else to do so: no extended family structure to socialise the little lambs ... learning difficulties leading to disruptiveness in class, then truancy, then a complete rejection of all education ... meagre impulse control, never more apparent than in the search for instant sexual gratification ... much testosterone-driven assertiveness that, naturally, doesn’t reap the respect it “should” ... the inability to take responsibility, any responsibility, for personal actions ... or to appreciate the consequences to victims ... unrealistic if reassuringly vulgar life expectations ... perfect self-absorbtion. It is all quite alien to an orderly European mind. But the whole is topped off by a touchy vanity that gives the impression of being never more than an inch or two from an orgy of revenge-taking. I remember hearing some African prelate many years ago say that revenge is the foundation of traditional African belief, and now I see from whence this river of godliness springs.

To her credit, Winifred Robinson understands that personal responsibility properly rests with the person. She never falls back on the usual, tired and offensive liberal tropes. We are spared white racism as the excuse for black educational failure, black criminality and black indigence (indeed, the programme makes it clear from the beginning that hundreds of millions have been invested in Peckham alone with no visible end-product).

Peckham’s Lost fully intends us to be left with the impression that the grand days of the sweeping government programme are over. The pleasure of throwing taxpayers’ money into useless, hare-brained schemes may never entirely depart the liberal-left. But the theory that it will make a difference has been tested to destruction on the young black male. And to absolutely nobody’s surprise the young black male has destroyed it.

Now local and small-scale, black faith-based initiatives seem to be coming into favour. They are about all that’s left, I suppose. Self-help is noble enough, and by its very existence nobly repudiates the liberal hand-wringer’s dogma, and requests him to step aside. Good luck to those concerned is all I can say. They will need it.

That just leaves us - not yet a suitable subject for Winifred’s winning journalism.

We have had to jump through hoops for the supposed sake of the black population. We’ve had to show more tolerance and “decency”, “correctness” and “fairness”, more non-judgementalism, guilt, generosity and forgiveness than any native people should ever be required to do. For our pains we are stuck with a black anti-social problem ... a black gang problem ... a black gun problem ... a Jamaican drugs problem ... a black AND white welfare problem. And all this where once English working-class culture bubbled industriously away, and brought completion to our kind.

But of all the fruits of unwanted, unrequested post-war immigration, the most dubious and final - and, therefore, unacceptable - is negrification.

Back as far as the 2001 census some 893,000 respondents were already declaring their ethnicity as “mixed race”. We have every right to be appalled by such numbers, and by the fact that black males will have done the greater part of the fathering. If not, what is the meaning of Peckham’s Lost? By Peckham’s standard, a negrified population is an unmitigated disaster for the English working class. Even if we overlook the associated and well-publicised Tridentine and, indeed, novaculan pathologies it’s the worst of deals, irreparably damaging genetic interests and shattering bonds of thousands of years longevity. Our friend Gongstar observed that, “Even if they weren’t imported as weapons against whites and dissolvers of civil society, it’s now clear that’s exactly what they are.” I agree.

We cannot blithely volunteer our children and grand-children for a life of racial surgery sans limit. The price is not ours to pay, but theirs. So what can we do for them today ... we who have so little power ... we who care so much for them and for the future of all our people?

Posted by Guessedworker on Friday, May 4, 2007 at 10:27 PM in Oh Tempora, Oh Mores
Comments (5) | Tell a friend

Comments:

Posted by Fred Scrooby on May 05, 2007, 01:45 AM | #

One of the best log entries I’ve ever seen!

Posted by gongstar on May 05, 2007, 04:49 PM | #

I’m not sure a programme like that could have been made five years ago and I doubt Sir Trev’s tribe would have found it comfortable listening. You could sense the menace coming off the gang-rapist-and-murderer’s father when she raised mild questions about his behaviour.

The liberal white female reporter Winifred Robinson could never bring herself to connect the shameful, Rushtonian dots.

It’s harder to connect Rushtonian dots when you’ve never heard of Rushton. But deploring blacks’ behaviour among whites is like deploring cats’ behaviour among canaries. The important question is: who’s letting the animals get at their prey?

Posted by Count Sudoku on May 05, 2007, 04:52 PM | #

One thing we could do is vote with our feet as millions of white people already have but in the future move to one specific country with the hope of transforming it into our image. If we were all in one country provided it wasn’t too big population wise we might have enough influence to turn off the non-white avalanche pouring in and replace it with a white one. For those who speak or want to continue speaking English, Australia is the best bet.

Posted by Fred Scrooby on May 05, 2007, 06:16 PM | #

“It’s harder to connect Rushtonian dots when you’ve never heard of Rushton.” (—gongstar)

There’s stuff short of actually hearing of Rushton that leads you in Rushtonian directions and eventually to Rushton or the equivalent. An example is using ordinary common sense. GW is right that this bimbo would never do such a thing.

“deploring blacks’ behaviour among whites is like deploring cats’ behaviour among canaries. The important question is: who’s letting the animals get at their prey?” (—idem)

This is exactly right. The élites have known forever that bringing lots of Negroes into your country increases crime, ruins neighborhoods then whole cities, voids real-estate values, strains social services as well as the police and the courts, lowers adademic and disciplinary standards in the schools, and leads to many other sorts of problems, without counterbalancing benefit. Yet they not only let the influx continue, they actively encourage it, nay demand it, insist on it, threaten draconian punishments for any who question it. So, they know it’s as harmful to society as cancer yet they insist on imposing it. Why, exactly? Well, the biggest motivation for this kind of behavior is and always has been money, and to the extent the modern élites include a bureaucratic managerial class they get more money when there are more problems to manage — in other words, they’re creating work, power, and prestige for themselves by creating ever more and more social problems, whence a reason (in their eyes) for importing more and more Negroes and punishing anyone who disagrees.

Of course there are other motivations as well: when more and more Negroes are brought in the Christians can show in a thousand ways how self-abnegating they can be, something they place great value on showing everyone; the corrupt can more easily find ways to demand bribes and skim money off the top of government programs without getting caught; lefties in politics can more easily garner votes from a non-white and a dumbed-down-white populace; the organized homosexuals can get partners with “better endowments” if they’re into adults and if not, they no longer have to fly to Rabat, Karachi, or Bangkok for the little-boy trade; the Jews get to gloat over seeing their ancient enemy the Euros now racially embattled, miscegenating all over the place, and heading for extinction; the lesbians get to punish white men, the variety of men they hate most; the capitalists and owners get non-white slaves to work at slave wages; and so on.

Posted by bernard on May 06, 2007, 05:43 PM | #

Methinks we will be seeing and hearing more from the likes of ‘disgusted tonbridge wells’ Robinson, as black lawlessness seeps ever out-wards from the big cities (where it was once hoped it would stay) to the hallowed, suburban, middle class enclaves, so beloved of the BBC and their elites.
It gives me a sort of vicarious pleasure to witness how the shit policies of the last 40 years of Liberalism are now going to infect them at long last!!

hip hip hooray!