![]() | |
The Political CesspoolWell, if we were to start an on-line broadcast operation (and we are) I don’t think I would associate it with human waste. Not intentionally! I suppose it takes all sorts. Anyhow, the programme list for The Political Cesspool looks more interesting than the name would suggest. Early this evening (UK time) Dr Tom Sunic circularised me with the link to his TPC interview, which was recorded in Croatia and is scheduled for broadcast at 7.00pm CST. MR readers who catch the broadcast are definitely invited to post their impressions to the thread below. If not quite with TPC’s effluent-chic we, too, are venturing into the exciting world of sound. Next week, in fact. Again, the MO will be in-depth political interviews, conducted for us by the inimitable and ingenious Søren Renner. He will begin with MR folk but, we hope, spread his wings far and wide from there. I’ve drawn the short straw for Interview 1, which will doubtless make everybody who comes after look very good indeed. Posted by Guessedworker on Thursday, November 16, 2006 at 10:47 PM in Media Comments:Posted by rustymason on November 16, 2006, 11:25 PM | # This name stinks. Who wants to admit that they read or listen to, “The Political Cesspool”? Not me, I’ve been close to a cesspool before and it’s really gross. Even thinking about it makes me gag. Batter up, GW! Renn, Soren, Renn! Posted by Søren Renner on November 17, 2006, 01:18 AM | # Sunic interview is TOMORROW at 7 CST. And, “Tomorrow Belongs To Me”, as I heard a bird sing after I drank a bit—just a wee bit—of the blood of the greedy dragon. Posted by allotmentkeeper on November 17, 2006, 01:43 AM | # I wish you well, but keep always in the forefront that audio needs be more immediately acceptable than the written word. I’m sure you’ve looked at every angle, but never underestimate the power of the written word or the damage inflicted by a careless comment overheard. I have every confidence in you guys. Posted by JB on November 17, 2006, 07:56 AM | # the written word is necessary and good especially because MR is more than simply a news portal but audio & video is also becoming a necessity these days if you want to get some attention and increase your audience. I.E. if you make or edit a video and post it on Youtube chances are thousands of people will see it, if your video can serve as a tool to promote your website then you’ll have made thousands of people curious and they’ll visit your website. And as I wrote the other day having real people discussing real politics and expressing their dissidence in words the average man can understand - which is what an audio broadcast usually forces the broadcaster to do - is more important than publishing these long articles with 100+ footnotes three suggestions for Soren: if you want to sneak au audio broadcast in Youtube use a simple video for the background and paste the audio over it. if you or MR readers can film some politically relevant events (i.e. conferences, racial incidents,) Youtube and the video should be used to promote MR. try to add MR’s podcasts in popular podcasts directories: Posted by Election Summary on November 20, 2006, 11:36 AM | # The New York Times Editorial Page speaks on immigration: http://www.nytimes.com/2006/11/20/opinion/20mon1.html Since whoever it is that controls the NYT has a direct line to NWO central, if not a member in good standing, this is an important statement of their intent. Posted by Election Summary on November 20, 2006, 11:38 AM | # The New York Times Editorial Page speaks on immigration: http://www.nytimes.com/2006/11/20/opinion/20mon1.html Since whoever it is that controls the NYT has a direct line to NWO central, if not himself/herself a member in good standing, this is an important statement of their intent. Posted by Lurker on November 20, 2006, 04:52 PM | # Re NYT article, the arrogance is sickening. Next entry: The Big E tells God: Thou shalt not love Thy children in the BNP Previous entry: Let's see Amren's editorial policies in action |
|
Existential IssuesOf noteRecent CommentsGuessedworker commented in entry 'The Ontology of Mind: The Gödelian Argument' on 09/02/10, 10:37 PM. (go) (view) Guessedworker commented in entry 'The Ontology of Mind: The Gödelian Argument' on 09/02/10, 09:59 PM. (go) (view) Desmond Jones commented in entry 'The Ontology of Mind: The Gödelian Argument' on 09/02/10, 09:06 PM. (go) (view) Raymond Bradly commented in entry 'Jews: jewish hand-wringing at recent high' on 09/02/10, 09:02 PM. (go) (view) James Bowery commented in entry 'The Ontology of Mind: The Gödelian Argument' on 09/02/10, 08:45 PM. (go) (view) Guessedworker commented in entry 'The Ontology of Mind: The Gödelian Argument' on 09/02/10, 08:14 PM. (go) (view) PF commented in entry 'Machete Ex Machina' on 09/02/10, 06:32 PM. (go) (view) PF commented in entry 'The Ontology of Mind: The Gödelian Argument' on 09/02/10, 06:28 PM. (go) (view) John commented in entry 'Machete Ex Machina' on 09/02/10, 03:30 PM. (go) (view) Notus Wind commented in entry 'The Ontology of Mind: The Gödelian Argument' on 09/02/10, 02:42 PM. (go) (view) Notus Wind commented in entry 'The Ontology of Mind: The Gödelian Argument' on 09/02/10, 02:31 PM. (go) (view) Notus Wind commented in entry 'If at first you don't succeed' on 09/02/10, 02:22 PM. (go) (view) Buzz Killer commented in entry 'Machete Ex Machina' on 09/02/10, 02:13 PM. (go) (view) Leon Haller commented in entry 'The Ontology of Mind: The Gödelian Argument' on 09/02/10, 02:04 PM. (go) (view) GoyAmongYou commented in entry 'I nose who you are' on 09/02/10, 02:01 PM. (go) (view) Thorn commented in entry 'The Ontology of Mind: The Gödelian Argument' on 09/02/10, 01:56 PM. (go) (view) Leon Haller commented in entry 'If at first you don't succeed' on 09/02/10, 01:52 PM. (go) (view) Al Birah commented in entry 'Are Jews White?' on 09/02/10, 01:42 PM. (go) (view) Leon Haller commented in entry 'If at first you don't succeed' on 09/02/10, 01:39 PM. (go) (view) danielj commented in entry 'The Ontology of Mind: The Gödelian Argument' on 09/02/10, 12:48 PM. (go) (view) danielj commented in entry 'The Ontology of Mind: The Gödelian Argument' on 09/02/10, 12:45 PM. (go) (view) qwery commented in entry 'The Ontology of Mind: The Gödelian Argument' on 09/02/10, 12:43 PM. (go) (view) Mark Dawson commented in entry 'Machete Ex Machina' on 09/02/10, 10:49 AM. (go) (view) Leon Haller commented in entry 'None dare call it White genocide' on 09/02/10, 10:35 AM. (go) (view) Leon Haller commented in entry 'None dare call it White genocide' on 09/02/10, 10:27 AM. (go) (view) Leon Haller commented in entry 'None dare call it White genocide' on 09/02/10, 09:58 AM. (go) (view) Leon Haller commented in entry 'Machete Ex Machina' on 09/02/10, 09:09 AM. (go) (view) Guessedworker commented in entry 'The Ontology of Mind: The Gödelian Argument' on 09/02/10, 08:19 AM. (go) (view) Grimoire commented in entry 'The Ontology of Mind: The Gödelian Argument' on 09/02/10, 08:02 AM. (go) (view) Grimoire commented in entry 'The Ontology of Mind: The Gödelian Argument' on 09/02/10, 06:19 AM. (go) (view) Randy Garver commented in entry 'If at first you don't succeed' on 09/02/10, 04:28 AM. (go) (view) Notus Wind commented in entry 'The Ontology of Mind: The Gödelian Argument' on 09/02/10, 03:56 AM. (go) (view) Thorn commented in entry 'The Ontology of Mind: The Gödelian Argument' on 09/02/10, 03:28 AM. (go) (view) Thorn commented in entry 'The Ontology of Mind: The Gödelian Argument' on 09/02/10, 03:18 AM. (go) (view) uh commented in entry 'The Ontology of Mind: The Gödelian Argument' on 09/02/10, 02:52 AM. (go) (view) Recent Posts
General NewsScience NewsScience CategoriesAll CategoriesThe WritersEach author's name links to a list of all articles posted by the writer; the hashes link to authors' homepages. LinksEndorsement not implied. Crime General
Immigration
Islam Jews
Nationalist Political Parties
New Right Science Whites in Africa | |