Posted by JRM on Sat, 04 Feb 2006 23:24 | #

I doubt that you can make the case that this is an inter-ethnic attack.  The two named victims are Ryan Peat and Carlos Khoshaba.  Peat is assumed to be NW European.  Googling ‘Khoshaba’ suggests the name is Iraqi or Syrian Christian.  I assume that the attackers are of Middle Eastern Muslim descent.

I suppose one could make the case this is an interreligious attack or more accurately, an attack by the unassimilated on the assimilated.  But the lines aren’t clear cut.

Posted by Brodie on Sat, 04 Feb 2006 23:38 | #

I doubt that you can make the case that this is an inter-ethnic attack.

Yeah, right. So you think they would attacked if the victims were muslims do you? Of course the NSW Police and their MSM apologists are saying it was “probably not race based.” But why should I believe anything the Police say on this matter? After all, they’ve got form.

Posted by Ian on Sun, 05 Feb 2006 00:43 | #

JRM, the Lebanese would have presumed that teenagers at Bondi Beach at midnight with girls were local to the area, and thus “Australian” for their intents and purposes. Their speech would also have identified them as such. Most importantly, they would clearly have not been part of the Lebanese Muslim fraternity, which exhibits certain behaviours that identify themselves to each other.

The problem with the Lebanese Muslims is that they require submissive behaviour from other non-Lebanese groups and resort to vicious violence to enforce this. Notice in one report of the attack the Lebanese attacker asks the victim he’s just stabbed how he likes that. This is a recurring theme. It’s not just hot headed violence, but the assertion of dominance. This behaviour figured in the rapes too.

Posted by John S Bolton on Sun, 05 Feb 2006 11:10 | #

Officials selectively allow these attacks, in order to increase the racial provocation on the majority. They need civil war in order to get dictatorship. The currency here is power; officials will always try for more power. They have to use racial provocation because the class war fizzled. The intercommunal aspect is just an extra feature to enhance the provocation. Every country in which it has been difficult to establish or maintain despotism is using policies of this kind.
The left has no chance to gain power otherwise. They need war because no rational arguments are available for a move towards socialist dictatorship.

Posted by Matra on Sun, 05 Feb 2006 18:55 | #

The .(JavaScript must be enabled to view this email address) blog has a link to a video of a Lebanese Muslim “retaliation” for Cronulla.

Posted by The Happy Rampager on Mon, 06 Feb 2006 07:19 | #

A better link to European Ethnocentrism:-

http://tinyurl.com/7eoec

Posted by Mark Richardson on Mon, 06 Feb 2006 10:49 | #

More on Lebanese Muslims in Sydney, this time from an Indian Muslim immigrant, Irfan Yusuf:

Some weeks back, whilst visiting a friend at Sydney’s only halal McDonalds in Punchbowl in the Arab heartland of south western Sydney, I noticed some young people with bad haircuts and even worse attitudes park their hotted-up car next to mine.

My friend is of Turkish background and was born in Australia. After we finished our meal and our discussion, my friend and I walked out to find these boys were using my car as a dinner table. When I asked them to remove their stuff, one remarked:

“Don’t f#ckin ask me to move my stuff, skippy!”

His other colleagues joined in the abuse. I noticed they were wearing necklaces with Arabic calligraphy of God’s name on their chests. One came upto me and said: “Don’t you mess with me or I’m gonna f#ckin kill you!”

On another occasion, I had stopped on a red light at the intersection of King Georges Road and Canterbury Road in Wiley Park. My car was in the right lane, and in front of me was a car with 3 young women seated. Next to them, turning right, was a car with young boys with baseball caps and bad haircuts. From their rear-view mirror was a red box carrying a Qur’an.

The attitude displayed by these boys was far from Qur’anic. They kept hissing and making sexual remarks toward the young women. Indeed, they were so engrossed in their abuse that they didn’t even notice the street light arrow for turning right had turned green. The girls drove on. I stopped my car for a brief moment and gave them a piece of my mind.

“Salam, boys. Is this how you’d like someone to speak to your mother or sister? Think about it. Your behaviour gives us Muslims all a bad name.”

The response from one of the boys was quite clear.

“F#ck off. You’re not even a Muslim. Those sluts were asking for it!”

I can tell storied like this until the cows come home.

Notice how the term “skippy” (Anglo-Australian) has become a generic term of abuse to these Lebanese Muslim men. It’s applied as an insult even to those who obviously aren’t Anglo.

Posted by Kate the Saxon on Fri, 22 Sep 2006 09:19 | #

Australian cops are just scared shitless…
So are our politicians….

There’s no Left-wing take over of Planet Earth.
Muslims are all Right-wingers.

It’s up to We The People to remove the muslims from our midst and put them somewhere else….much less to their liking.

Australia needs a series of Referenda on Immigration.

After thirty years of leaving it up to the various governments in Australia to decide who migrates here, We The People are in serious mortal danger.  I’m all in favour of reintroducing The White Australia Policy and bringing in another one: The Christian Australia Policy.

I, now, 21st September 2006, want all Muslims deported and I don’t care how long they or their families have lived here!!

These arseholes have been threatening to rape and kill all Australians since the 1950’s…..

I haven’t met one sincere and decent Muslim,yet.
I’ve given up now.
It’s too late.
Send ‘em home.

Posted by Fred Scrooby on Fri, 22 Sep 2006 13:47 | #

“Australia needs a series of Referenda on Immigration.”  (—Kate the Saxon)

Yes that’s the very least that needs to be done and should have been done to begin with, referendums dealing as they do with the “big national changes and truly fundamental policy questions” and genocide-through-forced-race-replacement being no small change to inflict on a traditional population.  A policy of forced race-replacement of a community’s or nation’s traditional population is the sort of policy which logically and morally ought to be submitted to a referendum at the outset before implementation is first begun, otherwise you’re putting the people before a fait accompli which can’t be undone short of civil wars, revolutions, and violently-imposed mass population transfers in reverse.  The élites doing this to us know all that, of course.  How do we know they know?  Because anyone above age four knows.  This is not rocket science.  They know exactly what they’re doing and we can only conclude from that and from their tenacity in the face of all reasonable pleas for fairness and other evidence both direct and indirect that it’s being done according to cold calculation.  My guess would be the plot was finalized somewhere around the mid-70s at back-room meetings of these various globalist outfits that hold periodic secret get-togethers, and word of the “inevitability” of these population changes was passed down thence to sympathetic and/or credulous movers-and-shakers.  I think something like that happened around those years and no one’s yet obstructed this plan’s steady onward march.   

From Wikipedia:

In countries, such as the United Kingdom, in which referendums are neither mandatory nor binding there may, nonetheless, exist an unwritten convention that certain important constitutional changes will be put to a referendum and that the result will be respected.

Furthermore, in most jurisdictions that practice them, referendums are relatively rare occurrences and are restricted to issues of major importance.

Advocates of the referendum argue that certain decisions are best taken out of the hands of political elites and determined directly by the people.

[Some] advocates insist that the principle of popular sovereignty demands that certain foundational questions such as the adoption or amendment of a constitution, the secession of a state, or the altering of national boundaries be determined with the directly expressed consent of the people.

Forcible race-replacement of a community’s or nation’s traditional race with a different one is certainly “a foundational question” and therefore deserves to be put to a clearly-worded referendum (no PC obfuscation allowed in the referendum’s wording, by the way:  the wording must respect total honesty as to what’s at stake, using as few and as simple words as possible).  The élites know race-replacement would be voted down in an honestly/simply-worded referendum and therefore won’t permit one until more than 50% of the population will have been race-replaced — at which point the “people” will vote in favor of the fait accompli but it will no longer be the original population voting, the one that got race-replaced, it’ll be the one brought in to replace them, who obviously aren’t going to vote to return home or curtail entry of yet more of their brethren.  This is all understood by everyone, of course, and is part-and-parcel of the situation being forced down everyone’s throat by the élites.

No one’s yet obstructed this plan’s steady onward march.

No one, that is, until we came along ... Right, boys?  (and girls!  Welcome to the fray, Kate!)  Let’s work to bring this outrage to an end!  We can and will do it!  We’ll have the other side wimpering with their tail between their legs before long!