Localized Monetary System and Governance

Posted by James Bowery on Sunday, 30 June 2013 19:36.

A localized state—emerging from wider anarchy—would need to include a sound basis for property rights, monetary system and collective action during times of emergency (of which there would be many during wide-spread anarchy). 

What follows is a proposal for such a localized state.

Property rights of a scale required for civil society are necessarily contractual.  Consensual laws beyond the commandment “Thou shalt not steal.” are necessary so as to, in all cases, assign entitlement to the substance of that commandment.  Once assigned, group force, entailed by civil law, is meaningfully applied to enforce the commandment. 

So to be clear, what I am proposing is a contract that an individual may freely accept or reject—and that this natural man should be considered to possess at least what an animal in a state of nature possesses:  The means by which to form a family and raise, to viable adulthood, the family’s children.  Note that this assumed possession places that individual in a position to freely reject the proposed contract without loss of vital interests.  Therefore, one must face the fact that if a proposed contract threatens the vital interests of an individual, it is unlikely that individual will agree to it.

Proposed Contract

Establish a monetary system whose backing assets are the property rights recognized by law.  These property rights are secured by a mutual property insurance corporation, whose members can be called upon to perform duties ranging from enforcement of property rights to “barn raisings” in the event of natural disaster. The role of demurrage, in, for example, gold backed monetary systems, is replaced by the insurance premium.

Underwriting assessments take the form of escrowed bids for the insured properties—bids accepted at the current owner’s discretion. The bids are denominated in currency issued by the mutual insurance corporation.The shareholder/members of the mutual insurance corporation hold one voting share each which is issued at the time they join. They may proxy their votes, as in any corporation.

The natural individual, endowed with vital interests sufficient to form a viable family, will demand, in exchange for his commitment to this contract, a voting share in the corporation and guarantee of regular dividends.  Note:  This demand by the natural individual, based on respect for his consent, is often overlooked—or even denounced as “collectivism”—in foundational thinking of libertarians of the Austrian school.  Delivery of social goods, and elimination of attendant problems corresponding to public sector rent-seeking, can be largely handled by this purchasing power, placed in the hands of the share holders from the regular payout of dividends.

Only the high bid in escrow for a given property right is charged no demurrage. This efficiently allocates the monetary base among the local economy’s assets. By this means, the monetary base becomes the liquid value of the local economy’s assets. In the theoretic ideal case, where all transactions are conducted electronically, a purchase consists of a change in the escrowed bids, transferring money from one person’s escrowed bids to another person’s escrowed bids. In this case, the role of the “investment expert” is essentially to act as an insurance underwriter who accepts a person’s money and, on their behalf, places that money in one or more escrowed bid that, by being the highest, is not charged demurrage because it has served the purpose of insurance assessment at the liquidation value of the assets bid.

Failure Modes

First of all, it is irrational—in the literal sense of the word “ratio”—to explore in great detail the consequences of this or any other proposed contract without taking its “ratio” with respect to commensurable proposed contracts.  Since there are no other commensurable proposed contracts, it is therefore irrational to place too great an emphasis on such explorations here.  Just as there are no utopias, there is no rational evaluation in the absence of commensurable comparison.

Having said that, the most obvious problem with adopting this, or any other contractual agreement, is that it is a creature of creatures of finite wisdom and is therefore bound to be imperfectly defined and/or interpreted in its enforcement.  A good example of this kind of imperfection is the way the US Constitution is perversely interpreted.  The remedy for this is to ensure that men may practically escape from the contractual regime—that they are free to leave and that they are guaranteed what they came into the contract with:  Their ability to form viable families.  In the present instance, that would mean that the US Government, were it similarly constrained to respect its own imperfect nature, would allocate land area to those who did not consent to its terms and conditions and/or to its interpretation of those terms and conditions.  Since land, itself, is considered property, the dispute processing entailed by this land allocation is rendered problematic but can be less so if the natural relationship of man to land, in the form of food acquisition, informs the process.  Moreover, this is an area where it is vital to consider alternative contractual proposals.  This proposal reduces the need to depart from it by virtue of the fact that the dividend stream provides a market mechanism by which land may be allocated to those of like mind about what “shall to them seem most likely to effect their safety and happiness.”  That is to say, the dividend stream is a caisson against anarchy.  Other proposals must either provide a specific alternative or must admit to greater hubris.

Now to the specific failure modes:

Corporate governance has many problems that have been shown by long experience to be predictable—particularly as the scale of the corporation increases.  For instance, it is quite common for there to develop a conflict of interest between shareholders and officers, even when the officers are major shareholders.  Dividend payouts are often times a source of such conflict, since retention of earnings within the corporation gives the officers more power while payout gives the shareholders more power.  This conflict is also present within this mutual insurance corporation.

The authority of the corporation to call forth the members for emergency service is obviously a potential failure mode—as exemplified by the present US Government’s tendency toward perpetual war as a justification for centralizing power to itself and depriving the people of their rights.  Obviously, the shareholders of the mutual insurance corporation would be in a position, via their elected board members (who, in turn, appoint officers of the corporation), to control this abuse to some extent.  But beyond this there is the very definition of what, exactly, constitutes a “Declaration of War”. 

Toward that end, a “Declaration of Emergency” is a more general phrase that needs clear definition so that it is less likely to be abused.  One step toward such a definition is an operational definition of what constitutes a “Declaration of Emergency”:

A Declaration of Emergency is a declaration of the State of Affairs that, once attained, ends the State of Emergency.  Moreover, this State of Affairs, to quality as part of a Declaration of Emergency, must be of a sufficiently objective nature that no substantial adjudication is required—it must be instantly recognizable as being achieved or not by all upon whom its authority is exercised.  This is adequate since if such a clearly defined State of Affairs is likely not attainable, the Declaration of Emergency obviously amounts to the imposition of perpetual slavery, and would be unlikely to go into effect.

Another failure mode is the abuse of the actuarial power of setting the risk adjustment on the insurance premium.  Two individuals may possess exactly the same market-assessed liquid value, yet one of these two may be subjected to far greater insurance premiums than is the other, and this difference may represent biases in the actuarial risk assessment.  These biases may be everything from personal antipathy between a property owner and an actuary to institutionalized actuarial rules that are simply incorrect.  Since the market is the basis for the liquidation value assessment—that portion of the assessment is fair.  The victim of biased risk assessment suffers damages that are limited by the fact that he can simply accept the high bid in escrow from the market assessment and leave the community.  In this case the monetary damage is relocation cost.

Another failure mode is the one the US is experiencing as a consequence of Federal malfeasance in enforcing the border:

Unwanted dilution of shareholder value.

Obviously the answer to this is to set a high standard for admittance to membership so that the value of shares is not diluted by invasion.  This entails “the politics of exclusion”—which is considered to be the height of evil in the present moral zeitgeist.

Tags:



Comments:


1

Posted by wobble on Mon, 01 Jul 2013 18:14 | #

I probably haven’t fully got it but the idea of tax (equivalent) as an explicit insurance premium appeals greatly.


2

Posted by Anty Ep on Wed, 28 Aug 2013 17:22 | #

The consent of the governed is an Enlgithenment fiction.  Enduring governments are formed by force.  They are NOT illegitimate for that reason. The Randian obsession with supposed rationality of contractual relationships via those estabished by culture or force is ridiculous. 

In any post anarchic situation the government that is established comes about as a result of the victory of some social group organizing itself successfully into a government that self-perpetuates according to some set of rules, and wins recognition from an adequate number of local inhabitants to succesfully claim leadership and representation with outsiders. 

Money is whatever the government accepts to pay taxes and whatever the government allows for payments of judgments for monetary damages.  That can be one thing or many.  in a condiction of anarchy essentially anything that serves as a succesful repeat barter item can function like money but money itself in the legal sense, may only be defined by a government.

Money is less of a factor in today’s problems then most right wingers believe.  Fractional reserve lending is here to stay as is fiat currency.  The problem is the social evil of usury which used to be a sin and used to be illegal and is not almost an unknown word.  Jews have made it that way and we need to rediscover why Greeks and ancient Hebrews alike considered it a social evil and get back to where it isnt the basis for our damned economy./


3

Posted by James Bowery on Wed, 28 Aug 2013 19:11 | #

Reductio ad absurdum:

If “legitimacy” is defined by a government’s power, then is it not the case that the “Enlightenment fiction” as you call it, is quite “legitimate” in that it has been used to fool vast armies of zombies into paying for their own enslavement and is, indeed, expanding that power globally?



Post a comment:


Name: (required)

Email: (required but not displayed)

URL: (optional)

Note: You should copy your comment to the clipboard or paste it somewhere before submitting it, so that it will not be lost if the session times out.

Remember me


Next entry: Génération Identitaire Occupies Socialist Party Headquarters Paris
Previous entry: They’re Coming To Sortocracy

image of the day

Existential Issues

DNA Nations

Categories

Contributors

Each author's name links to a list of all articles posted by the writer.

Links

Endorsement not implied.

Immigration

Islamist Threat

Anti-white Media Networks

Audio/Video

Crime

Economics

Education

General

Historical Re-Evaluation

Controlled Opposition

Nationalist Political Parties

Science

Europeans in Africa

Of Note

Comments

Thorn commented in entry 'Soren Renner Is Dead' on Thu, 28 Mar 2024 23:15. (View)

Thorn commented in entry 'Soren Renner Is Dead' on Thu, 28 Mar 2024 22:48. (View)

Thorn commented in entry 'Moscow's Bataclan' on Thu, 28 Mar 2024 22:02. (View)

Guessedworker commented in entry 'Soren Renner Is Dead' on Thu, 28 Mar 2024 16:55. (View)

Guessedworker commented in entry 'Moscow's Bataclan' on Thu, 28 Mar 2024 16:38. (View)

Thorn commented in entry 'Moscow's Bataclan' on Thu, 28 Mar 2024 14:36. (View)

Guessedworker commented in entry 'Moscow's Bataclan' on Thu, 28 Mar 2024 12:50. (View)

Thorn commented in entry 'Moscow's Bataclan' on Thu, 28 Mar 2024 10:26. (View)

Al Ross commented in entry 'Moscow's Bataclan' on Thu, 28 Mar 2024 05:37. (View)

Thorn commented in entry 'Moscow's Bataclan' on Tue, 26 Mar 2024 15:07. (View)

Thorn commented in entry 'Moscow's Bataclan' on Tue, 26 Mar 2024 11:00. (View)

Al Ross commented in entry 'Moscow's Bataclan' on Tue, 26 Mar 2024 05:02. (View)

Thorn commented in entry 'Moscow's Bataclan' on Mon, 25 Mar 2024 11:39. (View)

Al Ross commented in entry 'Out of foundation and into the mind-body problem, part four' on Mon, 25 Mar 2024 09:56. (View)

Al Ross commented in entry 'Moscow's Bataclan' on Mon, 25 Mar 2024 07:51. (View)

Al Ross commented in entry 'Moscow's Bataclan' on Mon, 25 Mar 2024 07:46. (View)

Al Ross commented in entry 'Moscow's Bataclan' on Mon, 25 Mar 2024 07:41. (View)

Thorn commented in entry 'Moscow's Bataclan' on Sun, 24 Mar 2024 12:25. (View)

Guessedworker commented in entry 'Moscow's Bataclan' on Sun, 24 Mar 2024 00:42. (View)

Thorn commented in entry 'Moscow's Bataclan' on Sat, 23 Mar 2024 22:01. (View)

Thorn commented in entry 'Moscow's Bataclan' on Sat, 23 Mar 2024 21:20. (View)

Guessedworker commented in entry 'Moscow's Bataclan' on Sat, 23 Mar 2024 20:51. (View)

Guessedworker commented in entry 'Moscow's Bataclan' on Sat, 23 Mar 2024 20:45. (View)

Thorn commented in entry 'Moscow's Bataclan' on Sat, 23 Mar 2024 17:26. (View)

Manc commented in entry 'Moscow's Bataclan' on Sat, 23 Mar 2024 15:56. (View)

Thorn commented in entry 'Moscow's Bataclan' on Sat, 23 Mar 2024 14:55. (View)

Guessedworker commented in entry 'Moscow's Bataclan' on Sat, 23 Mar 2024 14:07. (View)

Thorn commented in entry 'Moscow's Bataclan' on Sat, 23 Mar 2024 13:12. (View)

Thorn commented in entry 'Moscow's Bataclan' on Sat, 23 Mar 2024 12:51. (View)

Thorn commented in entry 'Out of foundation and into the mind-body problem, part four' on Sat, 23 Mar 2024 12:38. (View)

Guessedworker commented in entry 'Moscow's Bataclan' on Sat, 23 Mar 2024 10:01. (View)

Al Ross commented in entry 'Out of foundation and into the mind-body problem, part four' on Sat, 23 Mar 2024 05:13. (View)

Thorn commented in entry 'Out of foundation and into the mind-body problem, part four' on Fri, 22 Mar 2024 23:51. (View)

Thorn commented in entry 'Out of foundation and into the mind-body problem, part four' on Thu, 21 Mar 2024 11:14. (View)

Al Ross commented in entry 'Out of foundation and into the mind-body problem, part four' on Thu, 21 Mar 2024 05:14. (View)

affection-tone