Nawaz put at risk by (((The SPLC))), (((Nick Cohen))) blames “The White Left”
The White Left has NOT issued its first, or any fatwa, as Nick Cohen asserts, but what The SPLC has done is tantamount to aiding and abetting one. One may argue that Nick Cohen is as confused as his audience about the terms “left” and “liberal”, but it is not likely that someone with the name Cohen and entrusted to a prominent writing position at The Spectator is trying to be careful about clearly describing a platform to serve the full class of White interests - i.e., a White Left, not to be confused with liberalism, a confusion of terms promoted by his fellow tribesmen, and by which they’ve been able to confuse the public for decades now. In fact, he does indulge in a new twist. Whether he fancies himself as being descriptive of White liberals (in his view, Jews, such as Mark Potok of the SPLC, would be included as White) or he has some idea of the power of our burgeoning White Left platform, and therefore seeks to confuse it pre-emptively, he is attributing to the term “White left” logics of meaning and action which do not follow from our platform of White Left Nationalism - The White Class. Indeed, I had discussed the case of Maajid Nawaz with Kumiko, who had explained to me the irony of The SPLC placing this man on their “hate list.” While I am against making the distinction between “radical and moderate” Islam, as I recognize all of Islam to be harboring and wielding our destruction, whether most active in a present episode or not, I would not go so far as to put at risk to a fatwa a man who has, in fact, come to denounce the more violent and destructive expressions of Islam and is trying to encourage other Muslims to take advantage of more healthy, moderate and liberal life possibilities. Kumiko showed me this video of a speaking engagement of Nawaz’s, where he describes his project. She and I agree that Nawaz is a bit off in his recommendations - we would ultimately prefer a full denunciation of Islam in favor of Left Nationalism for his people, but also agree that such sudden prescription is both unrealistic and would be even more dangerous to him; as would our taking his side, in defense of him against the SPLC. Kumiko figured that we would not help him, that we would contextualize him in a way that exposes him more to Muslim violence by associating him with platforms (such as this) of White advocacy; while making an association here would also expose him to further Jewish vitriol, such as The SPLC placing him on their “hate list.” Nevertheless, we think, “of all the Muslims to put on their hate list!” ? The last straw for me though, making it a bad option to keep silent, was this Cohen guy trying to say that “The White Left” has issued a “fatwa” on Maajid Nawaz, when in fact it is The SPLC that is putting him at that risk, with a clear signal to more radical Muslims - “have a go at him, we wash our hands of defending him in his attempt to moderate Islam.” Now then, for a look at the article which attempts to blame something which Cohen calls “the white left” for this.
...and hypocritical, as now you misappropriate the term and in fact libel what would be a proper articulation of The White Left, if the term were disentangled from decades of Jewish journalese confusing “left and liberal;” and understood properly by contrast - by the public, and somehow by copyright law.
Well, I will not initiate a case against the sinister intent of Jewish media, even though I believe it is their sinister intent to prevent White (as in not Jewish) people from organizing, unionizing in their exclusive defense - a defense of those Whites who are relatively innocent, who are not right wing supremacists, but are rather characteristically cooperative, non-coercive separatists: White Left ethnonationalists - that there is by contrast an antagonism, a persistent, sinister intent on the part of (((media, academia and other niches))) to confuse the term “left” with “liberal” when it applies to Whites and a would-be “White Left” in order to keep them from defending themselves against the genocide that is being launched against them by Jewish and neo-liberal interests: by means of open immigration of exploding non-White populations, “anti-racism” (i.e., prohibition of White discrimination on the basis of racial and ethnic groups, even in national interest), ubiquitous promotion of race-mixing, endless propaganda of Whites as evil, advancing non-White interests with and against the concept of “White privilege” applied across the board, to all Whites, as something to be “legally corrected” ...their right to abstain from forced contract and imposition undone - a feudal differentiation of laws which disadvantage White organized defense; compelling their mere servitude, their ultimate extinction enforced at the behest the YKW and neo-liberal PTB. Not only would Cohen libel the term, “White Left,” saying “it has issued a fatwa” but he’s libeled The White Left also by associating it with neo-liberalism and the SPLC in its nefarious irresponsibility to put further at risk a man who is risking his safety to try to encourage more reasonable ways for Muslims. The White Left is issuing no such fatwa against this man, and rather believes that his heart is in the right place, even if still a bit misguided.
It is not “fascism” that he is campaigning against inasmuch as he is articulate - it is the right-wing feudalism of Islam and its (terroristic, if need be) imposition of imam compradores, radical shock troops and the feudal Muslim way of life against what would have been Left ethnoationlaist nations; if not for the destructive imposition as aided and abetted by neo-liberals.
Lets clarify what is really going on here, Nawaz’s enemies are right wingers, Jews (such as the SPLC) and neo-liberals who seek Islamic compradores and shock troops to disrupt Left ethnonationalsm.
And now you would try to say that we, “The White Left,” are issuing a “fatwa” against a man who is trying to do this good work? Who is libelous here? Not The White Left: we issue no such fatwa. On the contrary, we commend his good intention.
A White Left may see danger in soft peddling Islam and ultimately then breeding away White (and other) populations through integration with Muslims by way of liberalisation, but it would not issue a fatwa - the red left, the Jewish left, orthodox Muslims and neo-liberals who want shock troops for their feudalist imposition would hate this sort of conversion, not the White Left: we encourage Left ethnonationalism for all peoples.
Now “liberal orientalists” are to blame? Let me take them off the hook, The White Left maintains that Islam, all Islam, is utterly retarded and dangerous; but overcoming the inculcation in millions throughout the world requires all kinds of effort - including efforts like that of Nawaz.
Now it’s “the Western left.” A little confused Mr. Cohen? ..you certainly are sharing your confusion.
Racial double standards exist if you include Jews and objectivists, and allow them to infiltrate and wreak the havoc of their hypocritical singular self interests within a so-called “white Left” - But The (true) White Left does not permit Jewish participation, for its hypocrisy, deception and disregard of White ‘gentile” interests among a myriad of reasons.
Nick Cohen calls The SPLC, a Jewish organization which cooperates with The Massad, “White Left.” .. there could hardly be a more hideous misrepresentation of the term than that.
It would not be correct to refer to the shock troops and Islamic compradores imposed by neo-liberalism as “fascists” - they would correctly be called “feudalists.”
The White Left does not hate Ayaan Hirsi Ali.
There is no greater non-sequiter than attempting to correlate the SPLC with The White Left and to blame The White Left for issuing a fatwa against a would-be fellow traveler in Nawaz.
Mark Potok is Jewish (his father).
Well, we’ve established that we cannot trust Cohen to represent White interests accurately, other than that, the motivations alleged by Cohen in this passage remain suspect.
But the White Left does think The SPLC was putting Nawaz’s life in danger by washing their hands of him and The White Left should not be libeled by the accusation of issuing a fatwa against him.
That’s correct, Mr. Nawaz, and The White Left has neither called for a fatwa against you nor sought to misrepresent your good intentions.
The SPLC and some White liberals that you [Cohen] this time call psuedo-leftists are the ones irresponsibly ignoring these facts, not “the White Left” as we define ourselves.
You can be sure that Jewish interests, in enormous generality, do not care very much how its politics effect non-Jews; nor does objectivist liberalism and its proponents care.
It does not fight against the religious far right because it is not White Left.
Cohen has misappropriated the concept of the “White Left”, misrepresenting it to an extent only previously managed by the philosemitic sell-out, Robert Stark, his like-minded liberal colleagues “Rabbit” and Robert Lindsay, who want to misrepresent their liberalism as “The Alternative Left.” A tacit offer of (((media prominence))) is given to them in order to divert from and subvert a White Left platform, at the behest of the Alt-right progenitor and misguiding light, Paul Gottfried; with that agenda, they call-in Keith Preston whenever necessary to misrepresent the terms; they have also called-in Stark’s new side-kick, Jewish cohort Alex Von Goldstein ..add an occasional visit from sundry Jews, such as"The Truth Will Live” - rather the lies will try to live, but they’re not White, they’re Jewish - but don’t worry, I am not going to let them get away with it: in days to come we will ream them new ass for their egregious misrepresentation of our terms. Comments:3
Posted by Maajid Nawaz on Sun, 04 Nov 2018 08:01 | #
4
Posted by Glen Allen Lawsuit against SPLC on Sun, 10 Mar 2019 13:58 | #
5
Posted by "Moderate Islam" on Fri, 14 Feb 2020 19:46 | # Maajid Nawaz doesnt get that it isn’t “radical” Islam, it’s Islam Post a comment:
Next entry: Your People’s History and Future Irrespective: Mulatto Nationalism by Hillary or by Trump?
|
|
Existential IssuesDNA NationsCategoriesContributorsEach author's name links to a list of all articles posted by the writer. LinksEndorsement not implied. Immigration
Islamist Threat
Anti-white Media Networks Audio/Video
Crime
Economics
Education General
Historical Re-Evaluation Controlled Opposition
Nationalist Political Parties
Science Europeans in Africa
Of Note MR Central & News— CENTRAL— Ukraine, Israel, Taiwan … defend or desert by Guessedworker on Sunday, 14 April 2024 10:34. (View) Patriotic Alternative given the black spot by Guessedworker on Thursday, 14 March 2024 17:14. (View) On Spengler and the inevitable by Guessedworker on Wednesday, 21 February 2024 17:33. (View) Twilight for the gods of complacency? by Guessedworker on Tuesday, 02 January 2024 10:22. (View) — NEWS — Moscow’s Bataclan by Guessedworker on Friday, 22 March 2024 22:22. (View) Soren Renner Is Dead by James Bowery on Thursday, 21 March 2024 13:50. (View) Collett sets the record straight by Guessedworker on Thursday, 14 March 2024 17:41. (View) CommentsThorn commented in entry 'Soren Renner Is Dead' on Thu, 25 Apr 2024 15:19. (View) James Marr commented in entry 'Soren Renner Is Dead' on Thu, 25 Apr 2024 11:53. (View) Thorn commented in entry 'Soren Renner Is Dead' on Wed, 24 Apr 2024 22:36. (View) James Marr commented in entry 'Soren Renner Is Dead' on Wed, 24 Apr 2024 14:20. (View) weremight commented in entry 'Soren Renner Is Dead' on Tue, 23 Apr 2024 04:24. (View) Thorn commented in entry 'Soren Renner Is Dead' on Mon, 22 Apr 2024 22:54. (View) James Marr commented in entry 'Soren Renner Is Dead' on Mon, 22 Apr 2024 16:12. (View) |
Posted by Crazy Stuff on Fri, 04 Nov 2016 00:34 | #
http://www.starktruthradio.com/?p=3063
(((Stark’s))) latest guest in openly advocating miscegenation between Whites and Asians. Like (((Stark))) and (((Goldstein))) he also describes himself as Alt-Left.