A call for a radical right intellectual schwerpunkt

White people are now beginning to understand that their governments are siding with non-whites against them.  They’re not going to tolerate it much longer.  When change comes it will come fast, like a bolt of lightning:  the storming of the Bastille was a spur of the moment thing and shook the foundations of the world, which hasn’t been the same since:  everything changed in the twinkling of an eye.  The demonstrations in East Berlin in 1989 that Walter Ulbricht soon realized to his terror he couldn’t stop were sudden and spontaneous and brought down the entire European Communist block in a matter of months, leaving Ulbricht in prison awaiting trial, Ceausescu and his wife shot dead and lying face down in a courtyard, and the entire communist establishment in Eastern Europe rolled up and struggling only to keep from going either to jail or in front of a firing squad.  One day it was all there, impregnable; something like the next day, it seemed, it no longer was, but had gone up in smoke.  A matter of months and it was all finished, irrevocable change suddenly swept in, punishments meted out or pending, accounts settled, a new establishment installed. 

The following could be the start of something big:

Working class whites riot in Utrecht

In the Utrecht neighbourhood of Ondiep saw riots in the past two days after the police shot a man, Rini Mulder. The man had been fighting with a group of immigrant youths who were intimidating the Ondiep residents on Sunday. They had attacked a pregnant Dutch woman. When police arrived Mr. Mulder raised his arm to indicate that he had called for them. A policeman shot and killed him. The policeman is a Muslim, like the youth that was raising hell.

The killing caused fury amongst the working class White population. Mr. Mulder had been popular amongst his peers and they blamed the police for being too cowardly to touch immigrant youth. Killing Mr. Mulder was the spark that ignited the riots. A former police station in the neighbourhood was burned down on Sunday evening. Football supporters joined the fray and confonted the police. The mayor of Utrecht cancelled a consultation with the Ondiep residents out of fear. After Sunday the police cordoned the neighbourhood off. Despite the cordon there were renewed riots (Dutch) on Monday and Tuesday night. Last night there were 130 arrests. 60 of these were Ondiep residents, the rest are from other parts of the country, and mainly “football supporters” according to the MSM.

Of one thing we can be certain:  not a few Dutch bureaucrats are looking very seriously at that and are making plans regarding which country they’ll go to in the event ... in the event something big starts, shall we say? ....  Yes, in the event something big starts.  The only problem is once the big one starts it goes like a lightning bolt:  there won’t be time to mull things over.  It’ll be “Get out!  Get out!  Get out!” that the bureaucrats and government officials will be saying to themselves and each other. 

Things once set in motion will move with great speed ...

If we can create over the next five years a synthesis of MacDonald, Fraser, Rushton, Salter, Hamilton, Dawkins, Francis, hopefully some elements of Nietzsche and the other authors who have something new to say- whether we can discover new things by adding ideas together, or developing our own, or whether we just demonstrate that we have understood them - then we will have created a philosophy whose explanatory and predictive power vastly outstrips all competitors. Nationalism will have unanswerable arguments behind it; it wont be merely the gut-feeling, common sense appeal of our grandfather’s generation, but it will appeal itself to ‘reason’, the thinking man- and also gut-feeling.

As far as evangelizing and spreading the word, increasing our share in the market-place of ideas, thats a practical matter, dependent on concrete plans. Its also a function of the explanatory power of the philosophy, because it attracts ‘stray minds’ and appeals to them by virtue of it’s truth and inner consonance with itself.

Once all these stray-thoughts, studies, and observations are built together into a philosophical edifice, so to speak, people of more intellectual inclination can devote themselves entirely to strategic evangelism, the intellectual work being finished. 

(only tentatively, of course)

If we can create over the next five years a synthesis of MacDonald, Fraser, Rushton, Salter, Hamilton, Dawkins, Francis, hopefully some elements of Nietzsche and the other authors who have something new to say

Dawkins? Was that a typo? What does Dawkins have to offer?

Dawkins ideas are important, I think. The selfish gene paradigm as opposed to the selfish organism paradigm. The extended phenotype. (before you ask, yes, I did read it.. )
The discussion of arms races, manipulation, vectors and parasitism. James Bowery seems to think Dawkins is important too.

gnxp repelis,

“They” - the politicos - manifestly do not understand.  That said, “they” are unlikely to be the best or most intelligent leaders we could possibly have.  “They” are simply the most courageous, most thick-skinned, most determined, most angry ...  “They” are the ones who, today, are willing to put their necks on the line.  For that I am grateful.  I would not disparage them as you do.

Of course, I’m talking about European nationalists here as well as American WNs ... Griffin and the three musketeers as well as Duke and Taylor.  I don’t think for one moment that we should write them all off.  I think we should encourage them and those who will come after them, who may be watching from the wings today.

All I am saying here is that the way the mainstream works is not accidental.  Our side does not work that way, primarily because it is so divorced from the incentivisation of power that has encouraged developments in the mainstream.  With our people, individuals have certain intellectual interests of their own they wish to pursue - and that’s it.  Politically-speaking, there is no general pull towards the refinement of understanding.  That is simply not good enough.

You offer nothing but dissatisfaction and cynicism.  Let’s see what we can actually squeeze out of this strange nationalist animal before we consign it to the tender mercies of the butcher.

To “gnxp stinks” who seems a bit of a grouch insisting on everything his way, and to PF who wonders how big the audience is:

Everyone mans his post, including us and those who read this site, and those who don’t, and those who’ve never heard of EGI and couldn’t care less about Salter, and everyone else who feels concerned about what’s going on.  Each has his role to play and together we’ll overthrow the oppressors.  Each man to his post, and let him man it ably — his post, that’s all we ask of him.  The men in the engine room below decks aren’t the captain or first mate and the fighter pilot isn’t the ak-ak gunner and the cook isn’t the ship’s doctor.  Did every white man at Cronulla and every Dutchman at Utrecht the past two days know all about Salter?  No but each manned his post and did his job.  Let those who know about Salter know about Salter and those who know about something else just as vital know about that.  We’re all comrades and we will prevail.

To “Gnxp stinks”:  stop being a grouch who insists on getting everything his own way, please.  Let other people do things their way.  In this stuggle we’ll need all the help we can get.  Thank you.

Dawkins and Hamilton both were derailed just when their work became “dangerous”.  Hamilton got derailed by Trivers and Axelrod (both Jewish I believe) “reciprocal altruism” right after Hamilton’s seminal Innate Social Aptitudes of Man, which brought group selection of humans to the forefront of thought.  Dawkins got derailed by the Jewish-dominated “humanist” and “skeptics” organizations right after he published his insightful and highly “dangerous” “The Extended Phenotype”.

These are not random occurances.

Robert Trivers profile from the UK Guardian:

He was born in 1943, the second of seven children born to Howard and Mildred Trivers, who had met at graduate school in Harvard in the 30s. His father, whom he characterises as clever but ineffectual, had pursued postgraduate studies in German philosophy in Germany, until 1938 when even he noticed it was time for a Jewish student to leave. He was able to do this because his own father, an immigrant from Lithuania, had made a fortune in the rag trade: his gimmick was the two-pants suit, which consisted of a jacket with two pairs of trousers, since they would wear out first.

All of the images displayed for “Humanist of the Year” at their website:

I just realized the “humanists” may change the images in response to my links.

So, here are the names, in order, as they appeared when I posted the above images:

Carl Sagan (J), Isaac Asimov (J), E. O. Wilson, Alice Walker, Edwin H. Wilson, Betty Friedan (J).

That’s 50% Jewish.

Definitions Definitions Definitions.

Radical Right means to be a Monarchist.  I believe half of our problems is that we are all democracies now controlled by business, corporate, ideological interests.

The Monarchy is the Leader of the Racial group.  All European nations had monarchy.  The Monarch is the Father of his people.  At leas they have a concern about their nation that businesses and corporations don’t have.  Neither does Ideology have concern. Ideology is concerned about Ideology.  A Monarch cares for his People.  (Granted some in the Monarchy are affected by pc and socialism now.)

A Return to religion.  St. Thomas Aquinas said, “The more one loves God, the more one loves his nation”.  Love of God and Love of Nation go hand in hand. 

It is God who created Nations and it will be God that defends them---Of course we humans have got to put our backside into it.

Prayer.  What happened to Spiritual Warfare.  God Answers prayers.  Evil is a spiritual thing not physical!  How can you fight evil with riots?  First pray, and then go out and do physical battle.  Prayer comes first.

Education and Virtue.  Only the good can speak the Truth and Manliness in order to take a stand against pc.

My two cents.

Randall Burns today:

Dutch anti-immigration Riots?

Posted By Randall Burns On 15th March 2007 @ 13:58

Even Dutch MSM has been reporting riots there.

There is much controversy around the actual cause/motivation of the riots.

“Dutch media report that in the city of Utrecht riots have started after a police officer shot a man armed with a knife. This night is the second night of serious riots in the city. Cars are set on fire, shops are destroyed and a former police station went up in flames. On first glance one might think: Paris style riots in The Netherlands?  But unlike the Paris riots, the rioters are not Muslims. The rioters are all native Dutch. Just like the Dutch man shot by the police.

“So what is going on? Dutch national media are very, very silent about the reasons for the shooting and seem to suggest that the riots are just the work of football hooligans.  But even the strongest politically-correct force cannot stop the Internet and the blogs from revealing the real story behind these riots. This is what I found out, by looking at the local media and the blogosphere:

“The neighborhood of the police shooting is being terrorized by ‘youths’ (Warning:  Newspeak for Muslim youth). Like everywhere in The Netherlands the police do not do much about it. People are attacked, robbed, etc. People keep calling the police but they don’t get protected. Rinie Mulder had called the police very often. So when last Sunday the ‘youths’ harassed a young pregnant woman (a daughter of a friend), he went after them. In the fight that ensued he took the knife of one of the ‘youths.’ When a police officer arrived and Rinie showed him the knife, he was shot dead. … Was [the policeman] siding with the ‘youths’? (After 3 days of riots the police now deny the rumor that the officer was a Muslim.) The local media also report that the local Dutch people they speak to are quite desperate about the ‘situation’ in their neighborhood. The mayor now even talks about doing something about the ‘situation.’ [Inverted Paris Style Riots in The Netherlands]”

I wonder if that means Pim Fortuyn’s successors will be doing better in the next elections?

The Netherlands already has tough immigration policies compared to other EU nations (all major parties adopted more restrictive immigration policies after Fortuyn’s rise). However, involvement in the EU limits just how tough — and effective — those policies can be (the EU requires member states accept workers from other EU member states — so once someone gets admitted to France or Spain they can work in the Netherlands).

I doubt these riots are really about anything that has happened recently. Instead, I expect there have been problems brewing in the Netherlands for a long time.

Stanley,

Your Question 1 exemplifies my thesis very well.  Among American “Euro-loyal” activists there is insufficient understanding that liberalism is EVERYTHING, and that conservatism in the accepted sense is liberalism of the right.  There is even less understanding, therefore, that conservatism of a traditional kind may be revolutionary.  Further than this, I have argued since the inception of this blog that all classical Pittite conservatism, which died in Britain after 1832 and has never been known in America, IS a revolutionary politic in the most literal sense: it cannot come into being except that it slits the throat of the liberal “incumbent”.

Of course, what I think does not matter, I am no one ... not an intellectual of note, not a voice that carries to the furthest nationalist shore.  My interest is in constructing a platform on which those intellectuals, those voices can distill their ideas and nationalist politicians can perfect their strategies.  As Blair-Schroeder said, “We will establish a network of experts, farsighted thinkers, political fora and discussion meetings.  We will thereby deepen and continually further develop the concept of the New Centre and the Third Way.”

Question 2: Why is what we are doing related to existing national entities?

Because we are for our peoples, who are the possessors, today at least, of their sacred homelands.  Blood and soil.

Question 3: An intervening step will be the creation of a large scale and well-edited news agency, one like a “European & European Diaspora News Agency.”

Magnificent.  How?  Write the blueprint.  Cost it.  Find a way of competing with Reuters and AP, who dominate the global news-supply market.

Question 4: New narratives

I am proposing a conference in perpetuum of the loyal intellectual and political elites, on a global basis, conducted in VR.  Narratives such as those you would like to see may be fed from thinker to activist.  But evangelising those narratives to our people would be the latter’s task.  That is not the subject of my post.

Righter’s bloc.

While I dont trust myself to refute what he is saying (yet), one gets the feeling that he is ‘skittering’ over the top of something deeper

When I’m in this position, I find it’s often helpful to stop trying to refute, and switch to stating reality.  Helps a lot with Gordian mumbo-jumbo, or what SFers call “jewspeak.”

I don’t think Michael Shermer is Jewish (athough he does look it)—of course, he’s from Southern California, so there’s no telling what he is.  He spoke at my school once about the Skeptics’ Society and mentioned his Church of Christ (which has a history of being ultra conservative and Anti-Semitic) upbringing.

Shermer denies being Jewish, but he does rather look Jewish in the photograph above.  As for the Church of Christ affiliation, your understanding is diametrically opposed to mine.  My experience is that the Church of Christ is full of Jews.  I don’t know that many Church-of-Christers, but most of the ones I’ve met are of Jewish descent.  And on the internet, I often come across Church of Christ preachers who are or appear to be of Jewish descent.

One more:

R.H. Tawney, Religion and the Rise of Capitalism

I would say Fjordman is now become irrelevant by his refusal or inability to see the fundamental importance of the racial dimension.  He only sees “the Muslims” dimension:  “the Muslims” as opposed to the Europeans.  He sees no race opposed to Europeans, and no racial dimension to the current crisis of the forced demographic transformation of the Ancient Nations of Europe.  For him, if Europe became one-hundred-percent Nigerian Negro, Mexican mestizo, Gujarati, or Han Chinese it would still be the same Europe but if it became converted to Islam while remaining racially identical to what it’s always been racially, it would be lost.  At this stage of the game Fjordman is either dishonest, a craven coward, or a genuine nitwit in the C. Loring Brace mold.  He’s irrelevant and I for one am no longer going to look at his articles.  Bye-bye, Fjordman.  Been nice knowin’ ya.  It’s just that I don’t have time for vapid nothingness when there’s work to be done.  You understand, I’m sure.  Look, when you come up with something to say could ya drop me an e-mail so I can go look at it?  Thnx!

(No, I won’t say “Thnx, comrade!” I save that for comrades!)

Can one imagine just what vast sums of money have been spent by Jewish establishment over the last 50 years to engineer their particular view as the view? Disregarding for the moment where that money came from, it is not truly amazing to consider that how a little “consciousness raising”, starting with our young and working up, can quickly bring to nought the value of that prodigious work.

Think of it:  to the Jewish mind, if only all white people in the world could be transformed into Negroes Israel and the world’s Jews would benefit immensely.  That’s actually the way they think and they’re spending millions nay billions right now as we speak, trying to bring that about.  The insanity of it can’t even be imagined.

Or look at this:

If somebody doubts that unregulated ethnic competition methods might lead to genocide in the future (although the examples are plentiful in history) take a look at the growing and radicalizing muslim community in Europe.  Jews have advocated open immigration efficiently as a way of weakening the majority population’s power (one of the main reasons).  If muslims, who hate the Jews deeply, take over Europe as a consequence of immigration, as has been predicted by, e.g., Bat Y’eor, Bernard Lewis and Mark Steyn, the consequences to Jews might be especially grave. [...] If America becomes majority non-white (Jews have advocated open immigration efficiently also in the U.S.), who will these people target when they start to grab power?  Could their main target be a small group who have the most concentrated power in the U.S.?  Who knows what forms the powergrab will take.  Many latinos and blacks seem to hate and oppose jews.

See, but the brilliant Jews haven’t figured this out yet.  The billions they could’ve spent bettering the situation of Israel or in some other way actually making things better for Jews, they spend instead on buying U.S. politicians and mass media organs in order to see that race-replacement is imposed on the U.S.’s founding population until every last white is changed into a Negro.  The Jews by their behavior make themselves into a disease a Euro nation catches then must try to recover from if it doesn’t want to perish.  They make themselves into the Jewish disease, which Euro nations have to try not to catch.  The first thing Jews do to a Euro nation once present in sufficient numbers among its inhabitants is get the place race-replaced, perferably by something non-white.  Somehow that always makes Jews feel a lot better if they can just pull that off.  So Euro nations have to be on the lookout, have to start being vigilant so as not to let too many Jews into their countries or next thing they know they’ll get race-replaced.  You’d think the Jews would realize there are a lot better ways they could behave toward the host populations than the above, ways that would make both the hosts and the Jews way happier.  But no, that thought hasn’t penetrated Jewish skulls.  So populations turn against the Jews who then run around in circles baffled at where all the “anti-Semitism” is coming from.  (Hint:  When you try to destroy people’s races and nations, guys, they might, ya know, get mad ... Still don’t get it? ... Hey just trust me on this one OK? ... [My GOD, what fricking morons ....  The Jewish disease — something I wouldn’t wish on my worst enemy!]

Or look at this:

If somebody doubts that unregulated ethnic competition methods might lead to genocide in the future (although the examples are plentiful in history) take a look at the growing and radicalizing muslim community in Europe.  Jews have advocated open immigration efficiently as a way of weakening the majority population’s power (one of the main reasons).  If muslims, who hate the Jews deeply, take over Europe as a consequence of immigration, as has been predicted by, e.g., Bat Y’eor, Bernard Lewis and Mark Steyn, the consequences to Jews might be especially grave. [...] If America becomes majority non-white (Jews have advocated open immigration efficiently also in the U.S.), who will these people target when they start to grab power?  Could their main target be a small group who have the most concentrated power in the U.S.?  Who knows what forms the powergrab will take.  Many latinos and blacks seem to hate and oppose jews.

That’s got to be right. If Christians and Muslims formed an alliance that could be bad news for Jewish interests. The war in Iraq is instructive. If the Christian soldiers (mainly from the south—anglo-celts even now still ridiculed by the Jewish establishment) figure out that they’re pawns used to protect Israel, they not be so inclined to protect them again. As the world shrinks who knows. I’ve got a feeling the wheels are starting to fall off the Jewish cart.

A quick heads-up:  Fjordman’s got an extremely important piece up over at BrusselsJournal.com.  This is a must-read piece, comrades!  Trust me.  All friends of the principles MR.com represents must read this piece.  If I have time I’ll comment further on it later (might not have time though).

(I know, I know, I know, I just finished flaming Fjordman and said I’d never look at his stuff again.  What can I say?  I was letting off steam.  It’s still true he hasn’t got his race-awareness (or race-honesty?) act together but this piece is good, folks — good and extremely important.  Something is brewing out there and things are going to start moving in our favor.  We’re very close to the tipping point beyond which the other side’s forty-five-year-long régime-of-horrors can no longer be propped up.)

Guessedworker: “I would certainly like to know the ethnicity of Fjordman’s extended family.  That BJ article quotes Theodore Dalrymple, Robert Spencer, Bat Y’eor, an “American” named Jonathan Friedman, and a “Frenchman” film-maker named Pierre Rehov.”

- As far as I know, T. Dalrymple (not his real name) is an Englishman, Robert Spencer is middle eastern Christian, financed largely by jews in his work, Bat Y’eor (not her real name) is Jewish and rest’s ethnicity you surely know.

“That’s a lot of sympathy-going-on-advocacy for Jewish ethnic interests.  I mean, it’s one thing to insist on European self-determination when all the sound and fury is anti-Moslem.  But European self-determination cannot be achieved without the same separation from Jewry.  How’s Fjordman’s record there again?”

- Who cares what Fjordman does or doesn’t do. It is not his job to look after our ethnic interests, it is ours. Muslims are real problem in Europe, along with other immigrant groups Fjordman doesn’t talk about. If we can get useful information from Fjordman, we should use it and then disregard the rest. You can add “pro-jewish” before Fjordman to tell the other useful information.

Your article was good and important, but I would add something. You wrote about breakthrough by concentrating powers. This should be one of the methods. But other is finding point of views that supports our views without being them. We don’t change our basic views, but offer milder views for e.g. timid politicians and citizens whose thoughts have been fed by media. Immigration causes problems with environment, increases criminality, worsen the schools etc. Migrationwatch is somewhat like that. Then after people have got used to the idea, we tell that ethnic interests are legitimate concerns and explain it from this point on. We don’t try get people accept the idea to their own politics, just to accept it in others. That is easier for people. Then much later move forward from this point on. This or some other similar weak spot we should use in a gradual and slow manner. This is in the end more important than sudden breakthroughs. Also the paradigm thoughts of society doesn’t change quickly, it takes long time. It is like huge ship, with tiny rudder. Anyway, the most important and precious things are often in minority like White nationalists and diamonds.

“Anyway, the most important and precious things are often in minority like White nationalists and diamonds.” (—Finn)

Thank you for that encouraging compliment, Finn, comrade!  And thank you for all your exceedingly helpful comments in the threads here!  I always appreciate your very high-quality posts.

“Things are moving.  They are not standing still.  Things are moving in our favor.  The pace, hitherto snail-like, is going to pick up.  We’re going to start seeing more open resistance.”

- Sometimes there are breakthroughs and Netherlands’ could be a big one. The long term effects are decisive when evaluating the effects there. Important psychological border has been crossed.

Writers such as Martin van Creveld and William Lind have pointed out that states are increasingly unable to protect their citizens.

Are they joking?  States *can* protect their citizens—they simply don’t want to.  And for good reason.  Protection against immigrants amounts to protection against the state, since the immigrants are *part* of the state’s ruling apparatus.  What state is going to punish itself?