Frontierist News Roundup 20070126

“"The sheer weight of demography will produce a situation where no Frenchman or Dutchman could be elected to parliament without the support of the Muslim minority,” he said Monday in an interview with The Jerusalem Post. “

Look, this is just shear nonsense. It takes just around 60,000 votes to gain a seat in the Dutch parliament. There are, and will always be, millions of ethnic Dutch voters. An anti-Islam party got 9 seats (out of 150) last election. No matter what increase Muslims will make demographically speaking such a feat could always be repeated. This kind of exaggerating makes us only look bad in the eyes of the yet unconverted. Of course, I know that this mister Israeli is not “us”.

It was perhaps nitpicking, but I wanted to make the larger point that scathing those dark scenarios can sometimes backfire. That is not to say that I don’t believe these scenarios can become true, which I do. It presents a dilemma, though, because these kind of predictions can be a potent recruiter. Therefore a fine line should be drawn between a “realistic” scenario and a more “fantastic” one (such as the one made by Mr. Arthur Kemp that all civilizations, including East Asian ones, would collapse immediatly without whites).
I don’t claim to have the final answer, I’m just theorising here.

Also, there is something not quite right with the idea that we can only legitimise our defense against immigration by claiming that extremely dire developments will occur it we won’t. That it is not in our ethinc interests should, ideally, be more than enough.

More on-topic, I would designate the Atalanta secession news to be the most important news here. A very encouraging sign. First it starts with a county, then a city, and finally maybe a state. The recent development concerning Kosovo is a major strike for ethnic seccecionism, so the signs are somewhat encouraging.

Linked in the first item in the News Roundup:

Only one-fifth of the property that was stolen from Europe’s Jews by the Nazis and their collaborators has ever been returned, leaving at least $115 billion in assets still missing, according to a new study.

Many Western European governments paid restitution for only a fraction of the stolen real estate, investments, businesses and household items, while Eastern European countries under Soviet control paid almost nothing at all, according to the study, which was obtained Friday by The Associated Press.

Even the highly publicized campaigns over the past decade for a new wave of compensation barely made a dent in the problem, said the study, compiled by economist Sidney Zabludoff, a former CIA and US Treasury official. Elan Steinberg, a former executive director of World Jewish Congress who helped spearhead the 1990s push for Holocaust restitution, said he was “shocked, but not surprised” by the study’s figures and called for a rapid resolution to the problem for the benefit of destitute, elderly Holocaust survivors.

“This is an extraordinary finding and what makes it most tragic is that despite the efforts at restitution, we have so many Holocaust survivors at the end of their days ... who are not being taken care of,” he said.

Zabludoff’s study showed that before the Holocaust, Jews owned property in Europe that was worth between $10 billion and $15 billion at the time. Most of that was never repaid, translating into a missing $115 billion to $175 billion in current prices, the study said. 

A government report released two years ago estimated material damages to the Jewish people from the Holocaust at $240 billion to $330 billion. That report factored in lost income, as well as unpaid wages from forced Jewish labor, which Zabludoff did not include in his study.

The new study is to appear in the April issue of the Jewish Political Studies Review, a journal published by the Jerusalem Center for Public Affairs.

Should the Jews be doing this, given the way exact accounts can’t finally be calculated following world wars?  After a certain point the Jews should let this kind of thing drop. 

How much are they getting from Germany and the United States, and have been getting from them since the end of WW II?  Has it reached a trillion yet?  They should be grateful for that and shut up. 

If they don’t shut up they should be investigated for guilt of their own and held liable as a group for monetary damages against other peoples:  how much crime, death, and destruction in the U.S. since 1965 is the result of the largely Jewish-imposed Hart-Celler “It’s Good For The Jews!” Immigration Bill?  How much property destruction, economic dislocation, community destruction, unhappiness inflicted, and so on?  What’s the price on all that and shouldn’t the Jewish groups who’d pushed that bill since the 1920s for all they were worth be held liable? 

What was the Jewish role in the Holodomor?  Good authority has it that it was substantial.  Has world Jewry been assessed for those three to fifteen million deaths (the exact number is under dispute) Jews deliberately caused? 

What about the Bolshevik Revolution carried out by Jews in Russia and financed by Jews in New York?  Is the damage wrought by that vast, epochal cataclysm, the Bolshevik Revolution, even calculable?  It was almost entirely a Jewish national affair. 

It was Jews who ordered and carried out the murder of the Czar, his family, and a few loyal retainers.  What’s the price-tag on that piece of Jewish guilt? 

The Czar was held by the Russian peasants to be divine.  How much penalty is assessed for killing someone who in the eyes of his people was a god?  How much should the Jews be assessed for that crime? 

Did Jews cause WW II by pushing Roosevelt and London to tell the Poles not to back down before Berlin’s warnings to stop anti-German atrocities in former German territories under Polish rule since Versailles?  It is said they did:  because the Poles didn’t back down when warned by Berlin, Hitler felt compelled to occupy the Polish Corridor, touching off the war.  Did Jews cause that? 

If they did, how much in damages should be assessed against the Jews for the result of their behind-the-scenes intrigue — the result being a little thing known as ... World War II? 

How many Negro-on-white crimes in the U.S. are the result of U.S. Jewish agitation against free association in all its forms, preventing whites from having the kinds of communities they had before the ascendancy of Jews began in the 1960s?  What’s the price tag on that, on all that crime and death?  Can the Jewish groups who’ve pushed everything in that direction for the past 45 years be assessed for damages for all that Negro-on-white crime? 

What about the destruction of U.S. cities such as Detroit?  Did Jewish agitation play a role in bringing that about?  What’s all that real estate worth?  Have the Jews gotten a bill? 

Germany suffered genocide after the U.S. victory because of a Jewish-hatched plan to wipe the German race off the face of the earth, the Morgenthau plan in conjunction with its Jewish-hatched counterpart plan in Moscow with which Ilya Ehrenburg was involved.  Who got the bill for that? 

Germany’s factories were all dismantled and taken to Russia as war reparations, a third of the country’s territory was taken away as war reparations, and upwards of five million German POWs and civilians were sent as slave laborers to Stalin who never returned home but perished of starvation, cold, and being worked to death, and all that was done as war reparations.  Is money still owed to the Jews for the war?  What about all those war reparations?  Wasn’t it supposed to come out of those?  Millions of German deportees died in Russia as war reparations.  That had no monetary value?  Why weren’t Jews paid out of that?  Out of the German land taken, factories taken, patents stolen? 

And so on, and so on, and so on. 

If the Jews insist on recuperating every penny, so should the Kulaks, the Germans who suffered genocide as bad as that claimed against the Jews, every American killed, raped, robbed, damaged, or deprived of real estate, community, or other property tangible or intangible as a result of decades of Jewish agitation to stir up the Negroes against the whites in this country, and the list goes on. 

I mean, if it’s an exact accounting of what’s owed to whom, then OK, let’s calculate an exact accounting — one that includes calculations of the debt Jews owe everyone else just to make sure they’re not overpaid when the final balance sheet is tabulated. 

Short of that, I think the Jews should cool it on “what’s still owed to them from WW II.” Nothing is still owed to them.  Not a penny.  That’s how much is still owed to them. 

If the Holocaust is true — which I doubt — they were saved from total annihilation by the Allied Armies.  That service alone, rendered them by the Allies, is repayment enough. 

They want more?  After that, how much more could they be owed?  They were saved from extinction. 

Here‘s a comment I posted at The Civic Platform in the comments thread underneath this log entry about Jews trying to get money out of Latvia (you’d think they’d be embarrassed):

If I understand right, the claim is that: 1) the German government confiscated, without fair compensation, property of Latvian Jews during its occupation of part of the Soviet Union, 2) the property (presumably real estate) passed to the government of the Soviet Union on Germany’s defeat, 3) the Soviet government didn’t compensate the former owners (Do we know why it didn’t? Did they apply for compensation? Did the Soviet government invoke some law absolving it of liability, or was there some kind of settlement the former owners now consider inadequate, or was their claim successfully disputed by the Soviet government in court?, etc., etc.), 4) the property passed to the Latvian government on the Soviet Union’s dissolution and Latvia’s independence, 5) the Latvian government declines to return the property to the former owners or their heirs, 6) therefore the former owners or their heirs are owed compensation from the Latvian government.

You’d think this entire question would’ve been settled decades ago while Latvia was under the Soviet Union. There must not be statutes of limitation.

Hasn’t Germany paid war reparations to the Soviet Union and shouldn’t the Soviet government have paid compensation to these Jewish Latvians out of the proceeds of that? What happened, did the Soviets keep it all without paying any compensation to private individuals with claims outstanding for property taken by the Germans, property that reverted to the Soviet government? Weren’t German war reparations payments supposed to go in part to settle those sorts of accounts and debt claims incurred during wartime? Didn’t Moscow set up an office to handle such claims during the 40s, 50s, and 60s? Why is it coming out now, in 2006?

Weren’t a total of several million German Army POWs and ethnic German civilians from the places earmarked for anti-German ethnic cleansing (all of Prussia’s easternmost lands, Siebenburgen, the Banat, Buchenland, the Baltic Germans, etc.) rounded up after the war, millions of them, and illegally sent to the Soviet Union for forced labor, men, women, children, old people, until they dropped dead of hunger, cold, exhaustion, and disease? Didn’t that happen to millions of innocent Germans and wasn’t that intended as war reparations?

If so, did the years of forced labor extracted from those POWs and civilians before they all dropped dead have a monetary value, and why weren’t these Latvian Jews paid out of that?

Now, aside from decades of 1) straight cash payments by Germany in war reparations — payments to the Soviet Union, to Israel, and elsewhere, and aside from 2) the cash equivalent of the forced labor of the millions of POWs and civilians sent illegally to Stalin to be worked to death, didn’t the Allies also 3) dismantle all of Germany’s factories and transport them, lock, stock, and barrel, to the Soviet Union, and 4) confiscate all Germany’s patent rights worth trillions, and wasn’t all of that done to Germany as war reparations?

How is it that these plaintiffs weren’t compensated before now out of the proceeds of all that, which must have been enormous?

It would certainly seem money taken from Germany ought to have been earmarked for compensation to these plaintiffs and others in their situation.

Was their share of the gazillions 1) paid as straight cash by Germany, and 2) taken out of Germany’s hide in various other ways, stolen? If it was, how is Latvia now liable?

I mean, one would presume that Soviet property dating from the 1945 victory, property which devolved upon Latvia in 1991 or whenever Latvia’s independence was, would already have been paid for, or be in the process of being paid for, or already long since judged to have no debt still owing. How is it, exactly, that the ownership status of this property was not yet settled at the time it reverted to Riga some fifteen years ago?

While we’re on the subject, can the heirs of the twelve million Prussian Germans who were illegally dispossessed of their homes and of all the property they couldn’t carry in a suitcase without compensation after the war’s end (and three million murdered into the bargain) obtain compensation now from Poland, Lithuania, Russia, the U.S.A., and the U.K.?

Who’s to pay compensation for civilian Prussian property destroyed in the Red Army invasion and for the war crimes and atrocities committed in the course of it, and for that property which was stolen after the war was over? If that outstanding debt was cancelled as war reparations, why didn’t what was owing to these Latvian plaintiffs come out of whoever would have normally been liable for that debt to Prussia?

Who’s to pay for the one-third of Germany that was stolen and given to Poland, Russia, and Lithuania? Wasn’t the confiscation of that land, totaling the size of, what — six Belgiums? something like that — wasn’t the confiscation of that land justified, in part, as war reparations to be taken out of Germany’s hide? I think it was (the rest of its “justification” being Hans Morgenthau’s genocide project). How much is a piece of Germany the size of six Belgiums worth on the market? You can’t even calculate it. How is it that in 60 years the amount owed these plaintiffs still hasn’t been paid out of the proceeds of the third of the physical nation of Germany that was confiscated in 1945?

In view of the above and lots more questions I have, I get the feeling there’s something strange going on.
The other thing is, why did these Latvian lawmakers abstain? Why didn’t they all show up and vote yea or nay? What were the ones who abstained afraid of? Jewish power? Afraid of other Latvians calling them Nazis? What’s going on? There are tons more questions to be asked, of course.

Two generations after the war’s end and the Jews are still demanding money?  Shame on them.  They come across as nothing so much as grasping shakedown artists.  Enough already!  The world has had enough of this!