Posted by stari_momak on Tue, 08 May 2007 01:46 | #

From the biography:

His work for the IDeA includes:

identifying partner authorities and gaining agreement for high level support programmes for members and officers

providing strategic input throughout the support period, usually liaising with the leader

working with the Audit Commission and various government departments and inspectorates to ensure that there is a coordinated approach to the work.

This is hilarious. What does this guy actually do, besides liasing and coordinating and accessing?

Posted by Al Ross on Tue, 08 May 2007 02:03 | #

The pestilent Jew, Cantle, founded the Coventry University -based Institute for Community Cohesion. On its website we are blythely informed that the opposite of diversity is extremism.

I emailed the Sikh who is in day-to-day charge of this egregiously offensive claptrap and suggested, inter alia, that, for his turbanned tribe, the Punjab would be most congenial at this (and every other) time of year.

Do likewise please:

.(JavaScript must be enabled to view this email address)

Posted by Lurker on Tue, 08 May 2007 02:31 | #

It would be fascinating to know what kind of neighbourhood the good Prof favours for his own residence. Moss side in Manchester, Brixton in London, perhaps somewhere in Bradford? So many vibrant places to live, how to choose…

Posted by Matra on Tue, 08 May 2007 04:02 | #

Lurker, maybe he lives near that other preacher of diversity, Billy Bragg (pictured here at yesterday’s rally for illegal aliens).

For those who don’t know the lifelong anti-racist activist Bragg moved to Dorset. Wikipedia on Dorset:

91.3% of Dorset’s population were born in England and 95.2% were born within the United Kingdom. 98.8% are indigenous, an extreme example of the disproportionately small ethnic minority population in rural areas.

Posted by Al Ross on Tue, 08 May 2007 04:24 | #

Cantle lives in Nottinghamshire. (http://www.defra.gov.uk/news/2006/060810d.htm)

  Where exactly? Rushcliffe is my bet. (95.9% White , 2.1% Asian, according to: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rushcliffe )

Posted by Al Ross on Tue, 08 May 2007 04:55 | #

I’ve only heard 1 Bragg song, “Waitng for the Great Leap Forward”, and the Maoist overtones of the title were enough to flag a ‘bullshit alert’.

It is indeed a toothsome irony, doubtless unappreciated by the ignorant Leftie yowler, that, in order for China to make that ‘Great Leap Forward’, the wholesale importation of Bragg’s ‘bete noir’, Western Industrial Capitalism, was a sine qua non.

Posted by Lurker on Tue, 08 May 2007 09:46 | #

20 odd years ago I saw Billy Bragg playing (on the bill with The Godfathers - if anyone remembers them!).

Liked a few of his songs, New England (especially sung by Kirsty McColl).

I checked 192.com to see if Cantle Wormtongue showed up in Nottingham. Only one Cantle family there but I wasnt logged in, so I couldnt check which leafy suburb they inhabit.

Posted by VanSpeyk on Tue, 08 May 2007 10:07 | #

This, together with Queen Elisabeth’s speech praising the “social change” from the last 50 years in the US, is enough to once again realise how truly sick modern society is. The interest of Whites everywhere are not simply ignored but denied actively worked against. That’s why it is so extremely irritating to see so many people talking about"fair trade”, billions yearly spent on foreign aid and people quitting their job to help starving negroes in Africa. It is not so much that these things in itself are so damaging or even wrong (although I wouldn’t support them) but it is so infuriating that it coïncides with all the anti-White actions taking place.

About Cantle, though, I was wondering how people know he is Jewish. It is not that I doubt it; he certainly has the looks and maybe even the name but I was just wondering if that public knowledge in Britain.

Posted by Guessedworker on Tue, 08 May 2007 10:52 | #

Well, he looks like a duck and he quacks like a duck and he is named “Duck”.  But is he really a duck or just an unfortunate swan?  Nah, he’s a duck.

Posted by Lurker on Tue, 08 May 2007 11:13 | #

Im always surprised how little people here (UK) are aware of Jews as a group at all. Many dont seem to know anything about them. Of course most are in the cities anyway and in many jobs/places one would hardly meet any at all.

A friend of mine was talking to me about Friends once and seemed surprised when I made some reference to Rachel being a Jewish character.

Another time we were talking about The Sopranos & I got the very distinct impression he thought the Sopranos were supposed to be Jewish?!

When I had a Jewish girlfriend (& was still Mr Liberal) I became much more aware of Jews (the Jewdar was activated!), thats when I realised how little the average person is aware of it.

Posted by JB on Tue, 08 May 2007 16:57 | #

And our new Russian Mafia brothers.

BTW the Freepettes won’t let anyone say that on their dumb website but what is called the russian mafia is the jewish russian mafia

Red Mafiya: How the Russian Mob Has Invaded America. New York: Little, Brown and Company, 2000. 296 pages.

http://www.namebase.org/cgi-bin/nb01/dV

When Senator Henry “Scoop” Jackson pushed through an amendment in 1972 that withheld most-favored-nation status from countries that restricted Jewish immigration, the Soviets must have been amused. Brezhnev’s KGB opened the gulags and sent thousands of criminals to the U.S. and Israel. After the collapse of the Soviet Union it got worse; in 1993 a Russian immigration official estimated that five million criminals would end up in the West. Now there are thirty Russian syndicates in seventeen U.S. cities, not to mention the rest of the world. They launder drug money, counterfeit $100 bills, engage in stock market and Medicare scams, sell helicopters to the Colombian cartel, and penetrate the National Hockey League. By controlling more than 80 percent of Russia’s banks, much aid money has been siphoned off.

Russian jews takes underworld to new level

http://www.sptimes.com/News/071600/Perspective/Russia_takes_underwor.shtml

Being international in outlook gives Russian mobsters an advantage in drug sales, money laundering and the illegal trade of military equipment. And being mostly Jewish gives them a safe haven in Israel where many Russian Mafia types are citizens and thus immune from extradition to the United States when the feds get after them.

As they did during Soviet times, crime and government function more or less as one in post-communist Russia. Today, though, the same thing may be happening in Israel, which, Friedman claims, is close to becoming a wholly owned subsidiary of the Russian crime syndicates. “With two decades of unimpeded growth the Russian Mafiya has succeeded in turning Israel into its very own “mini-state,’ in which it operates with virtual impunity,” he writes. Warns one international law enforcement official quoted by Friedman: “Israel is going to have to do something. They could lose their whole country. The mob is bigger threat than the Arabs.”

Posted by second class citizen on Tue, 08 May 2007 17:57 | #

“When I had a Jewish girlfriend (& was still Mr Liberal) I became much more aware of Jews (the Jewdar was activated!), thats when I realised how little the average person is aware of it. “

Ain’t that the truth! There is little more that can give one an insight into the ways of Jewry than having a Jewish girlfriend. It’s only a matter of time after that for it all to tumble into place after that (for an intelligent person).

You either make the decision to eventually have most traces of your DNA (barring the IQ and other typically Jewish genes you possess) gone from your descendants and personally go on to become a typical liberal, or you break up for various reasons. One of which of course is that you just can’t see any threat from your own kind breaking out the pitch forks and torches (although she obviously can).

Posted by gongstar on Tue, 08 May 2007 19:08 | #

Those who can, do. Those who can’t, Cantle. His dead eyes and smug little smile remind me of this from 1984:

He looked round the canteen again. Nearly everyone was ugly, and would still have been ugly even if dressed otherwise than in the uniform blue overalls. On the far side of the room, sitting at a table alone, a small, curiously beetle-like man was drinking a cup of coffee, his little eyes darting suspicious glances from side to side… It was curious how that beetle-like type proliferated in the Ministries: little dumpy men, growing stout very early in life, with short legs, swift scuttling movements, and fat inscrutable faces with very small eyes. It was the type that seemed to flourish best under the dominion of the Party.

http://www.online-literature.com/orwell/1984/5/

Posted by Lurker on Wed, 09 May 2007 00:54 | #

danielj - LOL! Exactly right!

When she was happy, everything was great, when she was in a mood (which was a lot of the time)...watch out!

Posted by Lurker on Wed, 09 May 2007 02:06 | #

second class citizen - “you just can’t see any threat from your own kind breaking out the pitch forks and torches (although she obviously can)”

My emphasis above.

Right on the money there mate, that whole idea was definitely floating around in the background in our relationship - in spite of me being Mr Liberal!

Posted by Proofreader on Thu, 10 May 2007 13:32 | #

Great link, Fred!  Measures such as the one taken in Finland are current all over Europe. If you can’t even discuss about inmigration in public , let alone complain about it, what’s left for the natives to do?
Riot, civil disobedience, lawsuits?

Posted by Fred Scrooby on Mon, 03 Dec 2007 04:37 | #

The Jews are succeeding in driving Christmas out of the public square in Britain (browse the links herewith as thoroughly as necessary, check a few bios as needed at Wikipedia to round out the picture and fill in gaps, then connect all the dots).

Posted by Fred Scrooby on Tue, 04 Dec 2007 01:29 | #

A group of Jews is running the British government through the Labour Party which they’ve simply bought and now own.  Blair and Brown are their lackeys and do what the Jews tell them to.  The Jews say “Jump!” and Blair and Brown ask, “How high?”  In the aftermath of the Jews telling the Brits they’ve got to get rid of Christmas and also do away with the christening of babies (and after one of the Jews’ wives said Prince Charles should be told to marry a non-European; not mentioning the time the Jews told the Geordies they were hideously white and needed to change into Negroes) we’ ve got Lord Peter Goldsmith (look for him in the list of names at the bottom of this article) engaged in “reviewing citizenship for Gordon Brown” (in reality, Brown does what he’s told; these Jews call the shots and have evidently decided that next on the list for dismantling Britain and re-making it more to the Jews’ taste will be making some changes in what constitutes citizenship) now calling for changes in the national anthem to make it more inclusive.  Inclusive of what — Bushmen?  Hottentots?  Papua-New-Guineans?  What exactly do the Jews insist needs to be included more — Subcons?  Moslems?  Chinamen?  Jamaicans?  How come these Jews don’t ram inclusiveness down Israel’s throat for a change?  And why are the true English élites suppine before these Jewish equivalents of the AIDS virus?

Posted by Fred Scrooby on Tue, 04 Dec 2007 01:32 | #

Here‘s the article Friedrich’s log entry links to.

Posted by Fred Scrooby on Tue, 04 Dec 2007 01:57 | #

There’s a whole crop of Jewish businessmen whom Blair made life peers, and their names read like a Who’s Who of the Jewish cabal running Britain since Blair first won as prime minister.  It’s simple:  they backed him, put him where he is, in return for being named life peers once he got in, and being permitted to run the show.  No need to add that they’re not exactly planning on relinquishing power under Brown.  Open borders were no accident, nor were they “managerialism.”  Open borders were insisted on by Jews behind the scenes.  David Blunkett wasn’t the Zeitgeist.  He was installed doubtless at Jewish insistence because the open borders Jews knew exactly what he’d say and do once in place.  A group of British Jews are running things.  Period.  They’ve got the Tories partially bought as well, whence The Chameleon’s unmistakably Jewish water-carrying such as when he said there were too many white faces occupying his party’s benches in Parliament or whatever it was he blurted out in his role as puppet for his Jewish ventriloquists.  As Jürgen Graf said, in the U.K., the U.S., and France the Jews exert predominant influence over both main parties, so they control the government and the opposition.  How do they do it?  By buying it:  they spend enormous sums for the privilege of controlling governments.  Don’t worry, they get it back many times over.  These Jews who controlled Blair and now Brown are all of them always listed in biographies as fund-raisers:  they have networks of wealthy Jewish contributors they can depend on who pool funds to purchase governments, meaning they purchase countries.  They do the same in the U.S.  If you can buy the Unites States of America, if you can buy Great Britain, if you can buy France, it’s a bargain at any price.

Posted by Tommy G on Tue, 04 Dec 2007 02:24 | #

“The Jews are succeeding in driving Christmas out of the public square in Britain”

That ought to make anti-Christians such as James Bowery jumping with joy. His antipathy towards Christianity is as, or more, intense as that of the militant Jews he professes to despise.

JB said: “A Casual Observer” must be a “Christian” —or worse a “JudeoChristian”.  I wonder if he can point to a sect of Christianity (that has not been made pariah by Jews as has Christian Identity) that explicitly embraces the whites who want to form racial preservation enclaves.”

I wonder if it ever occurred to the genius, JB, that by attacking Christianity, he is unwittingly aligning himself with the Leftists that are feverishly working to commit genocide (or race-replace if you will) against the white-race?

I’m sure JB can point to numerous examples of Christians that aid and abet the process of race-replacement; but I would say to that: It’s MAINLY the LEFTIST (Heretics) who have infiltrated the Church that are the participants in such activities—not the religion itself!

I find it amazing that there is so much in common with SOME radical White Nationalists and radical Leftists. Their hatred for Christianity is a prime example that, in essence, bonds them together.

BTW—my post is in no way an attack on atheists. It is meant as an attack on Leftists—our enemie.

Posted by Fred Scrooby on Tue, 04 Dec 2007 02:38 | #

Tommy, there are some Christian outfits that are trying to stand up to Jewish genocide of Euros (I first wrote “government genocide of Euros” but it’s time to start calling things by their real names) but isn’t it the case that Christianity, in particular its Catholic and Protestant branches, has been one-hundred percent impotent on the matter and not only that, but has actually aided and abetted the genocide perpetrators?  That is undeniable and has to be closely looked at:  Christianity as it is known today is now culpable, which means at the very least that the Christian leaders of today including the Pope and the Archbishop of Canterbury are false leaders and, at worst, that Christianity is a false religion.  Whether groups such as the Christian Kinists can save Christianity remains to be seen.  As of right now, all mainstream Christianity stands foursquare in favor of the forced genocide of the European races.  (By the way, the Kinists have to find themselves a better name.  That one doesn’t have what’s needed.)

Posted by Tommy G on Tue, 04 Dec 2007 03:06 | #

Fred,

If Christianity is so impotent, why is the Left so hostile towards it? Could it be it is the last moral bulwark that is defending what’s left of Western culture? The Left hates Christianity because it defines absolute moral boundaries between right and wrong. That is anathema to the moral relativists of the Left. Right?

I never professed Christianity is the sword that will directly defend us against the malevolent race-replacers; I believe if the white-race continues on it’s moral decline, we are left defenceless against the race replacers.

As long as there is abortion on demand, no stigma for wanton sexual behavior, no moral boundaries where the most perverted sexual behavior is encouraged and celebrated in the MSM, the white race will continue to decline. Without the moral teachings the Christian church provides, whites are left with little or nothing as a defence against the debase modern pop culture…and our enemies on the Left know it, and they sure know how to exploit it!

Posted by Fred Scrooby on Tue, 04 Dec 2007 05:21 | #

First, the start of my last comment should have read,

Tommy, there are some Christian outfits that are trying to stand up to Jewish genocide of Euros (I first wrote “government genocide of Euros” but it’s time to start calling things by their real names) but isn’t it the case that, apart from those, Christianity, in particular its Catholic and Protestant branches, has been one-hundred percent impotent on the matter and not only that, but has actually aided and abetted the genocide perpetrators?

Second, all those considerations you mention, Tommy, are extremely important, you’re completely right, but together they’re no substitute for explicit acknowledgement by Christianity of a right of reasonable, humane group racial/ethnocultural self-preservation.  The race-replacement crisis is already far advanced and still no such explicit acknowledgement by Christian authorities has been forthcoming (apart from minor denominations such as the Kinists, whom I warmly applaud).

If Christianity cannot explicitly affirm (explicitly means explicitly) a Christian right of reasonable, humane racial/ethnocultural group self-preservation, it is a false religion and it can either get its act together or collapse as a faith that is appropriate for Euros.

It’s obvious that Christianity does make provision for reasonable, humane group racial/ethnocultural self-preservation.  It doesn’t require it but it allows it.  However, Christian authorities for some reason aren’t making clear that it allows it, despite the fact that the current crisis makes such an affirmation urgent.  What’s holding them back?  Is it that its compatibility with Christianity is true but so complex it’s easy to get wrong and misuse?  If it’s so complex that the race had better go extinct than the church affirm the doctrine that could save it we’re back to Christianity being a false religion:  a religion’s tenets are of no use and are meaningless if they’re too complex to be invoked.

A religion that kills the race of its own people cannot be true.

Posted by Tommy G on Tue, 04 Dec 2007 14:43 | #

“A religion that kills the race of its own people cannot be true.”

The religion of the Left: Cultural Marxism, is doing just that to the White-race.

http://www.americanvision.org/articlearchive/12-07-04.asp

Posted by Fred Scrooby on Tue, 04 Dec 2007 15:25 | #

Tommy, today’s Christian authorities only half-reject bad cultural marxism.  They espouse half:  they are in part agents of bad cultural marxism.

Posted by Tommy G on Tue, 04 Dec 2007 15:42 | #

“today’s Christian authorities only half-reject bad cultural marxism.  They espouse half:  they are in part agents of bad cultural marxism.”

Fred, I agree with you in part.

Let’s leave it at that.

Posted by voice on Tue, 04 Dec 2007 16:17 | #

“A religion that kills the race of its own people cannot be true.”

Duh.  I can’t believe this has to be explained.  A perfect example of christian idiocy is Mike Hukabee, the bible beating (earth is 6000 years old) dumbf*ck, just jumped in the lead in Iowa.  The only respect I will give christianity is it was the religion of my ancestors, and I would rather see a church than a mosque or a synagogue in my living area.  Ideally, I would rather have a racially conscious european man that worships his freedom/culture/children provided by HIS and only HIS genotype(however that is bundled to be spoon fed to the sheeple)

BTW, The reason the Left hates christianity so much?  Couldn’t have anything to do with the Jews, could it? 

Another thing about Bible protecting us from “wanton sexual behaviour, abortion and sinful moral behaviour” is any man that is worth anything won’t let his wife and daughter be used as whores or grandchildren aborted in HIS society!  This has nothing to do with the Bible giving us this morality, but all to do with losing patriarchal society which was lost during the war on the white male.

Notice how I use HIS?  Blasphemy perhaps?? You damn right!  There is no god standing over our shoulders as white girls get gang raped by Negroes, old white ladies get sodomized in our care homes, and our children are fed white hating shit at school denigrating the great men who came before and created modern society!!

Posted by Tommy G on Tue, 04 Dec 2007 16:40 | #

“Ideally, I would rather have a racially conscious european man that worships his freedom/culture/children provided by HIS and only HIS genotype…”

And just how are you going to go about making that a reality, smart guy?

Posted by Voice on Tue, 04 Dec 2007 17:37 | #

TommyG

If I don’t do anything to stop the miscegenation and racial integration in our living spaces,  then Christianity will die completely and absolutely.  Nature will ensure that the most hyperethnocentric males in the tribe will choose only white females to mate with, and this will become the most absolute solution for the dissolution of the christian church.  Nature will guarantee this will happen.

This isn’t to say that those who are left won’t be captured by the non-white masses with the white wives and daughters used as concubines for non-white masters and sons as slaves.  Of course, this is unofficially happening right now on a much larger scale with our sons working 60 hour weeks/dying in foreign wars to prop up non-white immigration/welfare/Israel with our daughters left to breed with Negroes and other other sorted mystery meat(hat tip to Scroob)

Parodoxically, if we do stop the immigration/miscegenation/foreign wars and gain largescale white racial consciousness and thereby control our living space, then I would expect the double digit sheeple to go to fellowship and worship the great god almighty for eternity.  Amen.

Posted by Tommy G on Tue, 04 Dec 2007 19:00 | #

Voice,

You say: “If I don’t do anything to stop the miscegenation and racial integration in our living spaces, then Christianity will die completely and absolutely.”

But you haven’t answered the question about how you will go about stopping miscegenation and integration in our living spaces.

Surly you aren’t blaming Christianity for the precarious position the white-race finds itself in today, are you?

I think it should be obvious who the enimie is. It’s the political Left/Cultural Marxists. Not just Jewish Leftists, but ALL Leftists.

Yes, Jewish Leftists are very problematic, but put in the larger context, they are only a segment of the problem we face. Only someone with a one dimensional view of the world would place all—or even most of—the blame on Jews.

We, as race-realists, must come to terms with the fact we make-up a tiny minority within the white-race. Probably less than 5% overall. If we want our ideas to resonate within the larger white community, the last thing we should do is deliberately offend people who profess to believe in Christianity; after all, they still comprise at least 85% of whites in the U.S. (albeit most of them are liberals). That percentage is probably allot less in Europe, but look at the moral and cultural morass the E.U. is in.

Lastly: Is it just a coincidence the decline of Traditional Christianity coincides with the rise of modern liberalism with all the radical feminism, racial egalitarianism, miscegenation and third world immigration that goes with it?

I think not. It is evedence the Left is firmly in control, especially at the upper levels of society.

Posted by Guessedworker on Tue, 04 Dec 2007 19:20 | #

Tommy,

We are 80% of our people, not 5.  It just depends on how you ask the question.  At the moment, the question is being asked generally how anyone could possibly sympathise with a vile, fascistic, racist ideology pursued by haters and the terminally violent.  Result: 5% say “fuck you, pal, I do.”  But ask the question: have you had enough of diversity being shoved down everybody’s throat, and do you think the time is going to come when we guys are going to have to change things, and presto ... 80%.

The cause of our troubles is not simply the left.  It is also the right.  But beyond the false dichotomy of left-right that cause is actually four-fold:-

In the broadest terms, advanced liberalism (or, if you prefer to think from a slightly different angle, postmodernity) sets the general range of possibilities - which, of course, are ever more progressive.  That’s on one corner of the cart.

On an adjacent corner, liberalism’s power elites pull the strings to their own advantage (actually, advantages, since the elites are not monolithic).

Providing ideological traction and well-financed activism at the rear is Jewish ethno-aggression.

And the fourth wheel is all the processes of local displacement, national dispossession and deracination .... the slow genocide that flows from sustained mass immigration.

These are the subject matter of the postmodern world from a white or European perspective.  They are what we complain of and strive to understand and explain, and find solutions to everyday here.

Posted by Tommy G on Tue, 04 Dec 2007 20:13 | #

“We are 80% of our people, not 5.  It just depends on how you ask the question.  At the moment, the question is being asked generally how anyone could possibly sympathise with a vile, fascistic, racist ideology pursued by haters and the terminally violent.  Result: 5% say “fuck you, pal, I do.” But ask the question: have you had enough of diversity being shoved down everybody’s throat, and do you think the time is going to come when we guys are going to have to change things, and presto ... 80%.”

“The cause of our troubles is not simply the left.  It is also the right.  But beyond the false dichotomy of left-right that cause is actually four-fold:-...”

I agree, GW. You’ve painted the picture like a master!

Posted by Fred Scrooby on Sat, 08 Dec 2007 21:03 | #

British journalist Dominic Lawson appropriately lambastes the Church of England here, wrongly omitting to lambaste Jewry as sharing “Blame for our Predicament.”  The “catastrophic collapse of Christian-based morality and spirituality in [Britain]” which CoE Bishop Nazir-Ali rightly identifies and deplores, a collapse “over the past 40 or so years” which “has created a ‘moral vacuum’ in society as a whole,” is more Jewry’s fault than Anglicanism’s.  And while we’re apportioning blame let’s not leave out the saddest performance imaginable on the part of the British royal family:  the Queen, Prince Phillip, and Prince Charles, especially the latter two, being men.  In a just-published book Britain’s Chief Rabbi lays blame for multiculti at the feet of the Jews for originating the strategy of minority-victimhood/ethnic-identity politics (he’s right but for more reasons than that).  Jews who are aghast at what’s happening are as morally obliged as non-Jews are to do as the Chief Rabbi has done and “name the Jew”:  an end to the horror will require naming the culprits and Lawson, who is Jewish (he’s Nigella Lawson’s brother and son of Lord Nigel Lawson, Maggie’s Exchequer), gets off to a good start by naming the CoE but then mysteriously stops.  You can’t stop.  You have to name them all, all the main ones, and to not see the predominant Jewish role of the last forty-odd years you’d have to be blind or dishonest (I’d say both, because to be this blind you’d have to be dishonest:  “There are none so blind as they who don’t want to see”).

But at least Lawson is upset about what’s going on, I’ll give him that.  That’s a damn sight better than some British Jewish insects I could name (and non-Jewish ones too of course, plenty of those).

Posted by Fred Scrooby on Thu, 27 Dec 2007 05:06 | #

May we expect that after this conference the loathesome-beyond-words ADL will call for “immigration reform” for Israel too?( * )
______

( * ) “Immigration reform” is current Jewspeak for prying open the U.S.‘s borders and shoving race-replacement down its throat.  Gee do you think we should hold our breath waiting for the ADL to call for “immigration reform” for Israel too?  And did you notice how Foxman’s ADL was allying itself with all the anti-white Hispanic groups at this conference?  Right, just exactly as, when he’s in Israel, he alligns the ADL with all the Palestinian groups who want a right of return to Israel for Palestinan Moslems.  Hey wait, I’ll call my doctor and ask him if that would be a wise move .... (Holding my breath, I mean) ... Be right back! ....... 

( Hat tip )

Posted by Fred Scrooby on Sun, 30 Dec 2007 14:16 | #

Gee thanks, Jews, for creating the post-‘60s atmosphere in which it’s viewed as bad for police to find out the guy who committed a crime is a Negro — if that’s the criminal’s race it’s better to let him get away than find out (finding out is racist, according to Abe Foxman’s ADL and 99.9999999999999999999999999% of those U.S. Jews who have any influence over anything).

Oops!  It just occurred to me that the 0.000000000000000000000000001% of Jews who don’t think that way means thanking Jews for the current state of affairs is illegitimate.  All right, I take back what I said above and by that reasoning, since 0.0000000000000000000000001% of Amishmen think the new atmosphere is just great, we’re entitled to blame it on the Amish.  Those bastards, why did they do this to us?  (Did I get that reasoning right?  I hope so .....)

Oh did someone say the percentage of rank-and-file Jews who think like that isn’t so high, only of those in leadership, the ones actually exerting extreme pressures on public policy, on pushing the universal entrenchment of PC, anti-racism, open borders, and so forth?  OK, so since all the Jewish influence on society comes from the lower-down rank-and-file guys who don’t like what’s going on, and none from the leadership of Jewish organizations galore in this country who do, it’s not true to implicate Jews in what’s going on.  (I think I got that reasoning right, no?  Hey correct me if I’m wrong ......)

But wait, how can Jews, less than three percent of the population, make an impact?  Oh yeah that’s right, I forgot how insane those maps are that show a country’s size in proportion to its gross national product or standard of living instead of its geographical area — the ones where the Grand Duchy of Luxemburg comes out fifty times bigger than Zaïre when it’s a hundred times smaller, the ones where, if the Jewish community’s wealth, influence, political engagement, strategic nepotism, etc., determined that community’s “size” on the map it would come out huge rather than “less than three percent of the U.S.” — Yeah I forgot how insane those maps were but thanks for reminding me ....