![]() | |
Obama, because that’s who Zionists don’t trustThe manipulation of the American political machine is the sole privilege of Jews. Everyone knows that. Or rather, everyone in the American political machine knows that, of course. But nobody else should, and no one needs to. And really, what’s it to ordinary disempowered Americans where policy comes from? Nothing whatsoever. Brave little Israel they must know about, of course ... the Holocaust ... MLK ... white guilt. That sort of thing. But the Israel Lobby? Are you nuts? So here, from a couple of years ago, is Eliot Cohen in the Washington Post ritually demonising the Walt & Mearsheimer paper out of existence. He hopes.
Trouble is, those three little words “The Israel Lobby” have escaped into the public consciousness and cannot so easily be recalled, especially while some dumb Jewish journalist can lose the plot as royally as Dana Milbank did. Reporting for the Post on a public meeting last Monday called by a “group of Jewish leaders” to discuss the 2008 presidential election, he actually wrote:-
So let’s run that thought-crime from Ann Lewis by once more. Remember, this is a senior advisor to the Lizard Queen speaking.
Well, it didn’t go down too swimmingly with the goy readers of the Post. The really interesting thing is the number of commenters in the long thread to the article who understand all about the Lobby. The outrage speaks for itself. One comment, from EdFromNH, stands above the rest for its articulacy:-
Now, let’s get real. EdFromNH is sufficient of a bien pensant to still believe in the fundamental goodness of Man, meaning in this instance Dana Milbank and all the Jews who did not sign those threatening letters. He has no real conception of ethnicity, and misses the Manichean character of genetic interests and resource competition. So, inevitably, he reaches for an abstract, liberalistic measure of the good, and concludes that “Zionism and anti-Semitism are evil twins. They are both ideologies founded on discriminating against people based on whether or not they are Jewish.” He appeals to American Jewry to “condemn the offensive discrimination, censorship, McCarthy-like smear campaigns, and treason of the Zionist-racists who force our politicians to subject the sovereignty of America to the will of Israeli voters.” So despite experiencing the sharp end of Jewish activism, EdFromNH is none too sharp on the JQ. He displays no interest in escaping his cocoon of comfortable illusion. Probably he will never escape. But the one thing that might encourage him - and those millions like him - would be the four-year get-down of the black son of Dar al-Harb in the Oval Office. Neither Clinton Two, the Horror Movie nor Lie Hard offer quite the same heady mix of stress fractures between the “sole manipulators” and the “soul manipulator”, as well as between the White House and white America. If I had a vote on 4th November 2008 - and of course I do not - I would cast it for whoever would unwittingly do the most for my people. He’s black. That’s how dire the choice is. Posted by Guessedworker on Friday, March 21, 2008 at 10:12 AM in U.S. Politics Comments:Posted by Nux Gnomica on March 22, 2008, 05:20 PM | #
Larry Auster has been arguing the same:
Posted by Honky McCracker on March 22, 2008, 06:31 PM | # I agree, bring on the niggerfuxation. Posted by Martin Luther Coon Jr. on March 22, 2008, 07:12 PM | # Honky McCracker said: “I agree, bring on the niggerfuxation.” Yes, bring it on! What do we have to lose? We know Juan McManiac will probably usher in a nuclear war. The Great Red Queen will mix a poisonous socialist cocktail heavily flavored with anti-white-maleness...and force all to drink it. BO, as much as his anti-whitey propensities stinks like rotting KFC on a hot summer night, his presidency may shock the brainwashed white zombie masses out of their collective trance? Posted by Svyatoslav Igorevich on March 23, 2008, 04:07 PM | # I’ve spent the last few months trying to internally argue against the “worse is better” meme vis-a-vis B’lack O’rama, and I’m losing. What a clusterfuck… Posted by Al Ross on March 29, 2008, 12:51 PM | # The White American boobs who vote Democrat are permitted a choice of Jewish views. On the one hand there is Mrs Clinton’s hard-driving Campaign Director of Communications, Howard Wolfson and on the other the Mulatto Obama’s Special Adviser on the Middle East, a Jew with the racially misleading name of Dennis Ross. Posted by Fred Scrooby on March 29, 2008, 02:10 PM | # Regarding Al Ross’s comment, the GOP is also thick with open-borders Jews. What Jews do is make sure that no matter which party or individual wins an election, they control certain briefs: policy toward Israel of course, and immigration. Those two briefs they absolutely make certain they control come hell or high water, no matter whom they’re working for, communists, Nazis, Republikahns, Dhimmicrats, Libertardians, you-name-it-they’ve-got-control-of-those-two-briefs-under-it. To get and keep control of those two briefs they’ll go to any lengths, spend fortunes, lie, cheat, steal, swindle, push their own grandmother off a cliff but they’ll not let those two briefs get out of Jewish control. It’s almost as it it was written into the Protocols of the Elders of Zion. (I think it was, actually.) All Jews (with the sole exception of true American patriots David ben Moshe and Chaim ben Pesach and the organization they head, the Jewish Task Force, jtf.org) being open-borders fanatics, we’ll never get closed borders again until we wrest control of the immigration brief away from Hebrew clutches (that or get it into JTF clutches, either one). As Jürgen Graf has said, in the U.S.K., the U.K., and France Jews control both the government and the opposition. So, no matter who sits before the levers of power Jews have control over immigration policy, therefore no matter which party or individual wins the election the country gets open borders forced on it. Posted by Fred Scrooby on March 29, 2008, 02:17 PM | # Excuse me, where I put “briefs” in my above comment I should have said “portfolios.” (After long years away from living in Europe I’ve lost my feel for some of the terminolgy over there.) Posted by Lurker on March 30, 2008, 12:27 AM | # No worries Fred, the meaning is still crystal clear. Posted by Desmond Jones on February 11, 2009, 06:34 PM | # Report: Zinni ambassadorship ixnayed by Israel lobby
Posted by Fred Scrooby on February 11, 2009, 08:50 PM | # Desmond exposes here a naked example of Jewish control over the U.S. government, for those skeptics who still think Jews don’t get what they want on two issues they deem of central importance to their tribe, 1) open borders and forced race-replacement, and 2) Israel. Immense Jewish resourced are mobilized by them to ensure they get what they want in these two areas. Posted by Fred Scrooby on February 11, 2009, 08:51 PM | # (In that last comment I was referring to Desmond’s comment just above.) Next entry: Misology in America Part 4 - Gender Previous entry: Jewish civil rights activist's poem to Obama |
|
Existential IssuesOf noteRecent CommentsGuessedworker commented in entry 'The Ontology of Mind: The Gödelian Argument' on 09/02/10, 10:37 PM. (go) (view) Guessedworker commented in entry 'The Ontology of Mind: The Gödelian Argument' on 09/02/10, 09:59 PM. (go) (view) Desmond Jones commented in entry 'The Ontology of Mind: The Gödelian Argument' on 09/02/10, 09:06 PM. (go) (view) Raymond Bradly commented in entry 'Jews: jewish hand-wringing at recent high' on 09/02/10, 09:02 PM. (go) (view) James Bowery commented in entry 'The Ontology of Mind: The Gödelian Argument' on 09/02/10, 08:45 PM. (go) (view) Guessedworker commented in entry 'The Ontology of Mind: The Gödelian Argument' on 09/02/10, 08:14 PM. (go) (view) PF commented in entry 'Machete Ex Machina' on 09/02/10, 06:32 PM. (go) (view) PF commented in entry 'The Ontology of Mind: The Gödelian Argument' on 09/02/10, 06:28 PM. (go) (view) John commented in entry 'Machete Ex Machina' on 09/02/10, 03:30 PM. (go) (view) Notus Wind commented in entry 'The Ontology of Mind: The Gödelian Argument' on 09/02/10, 02:42 PM. (go) (view) Notus Wind commented in entry 'The Ontology of Mind: The Gödelian Argument' on 09/02/10, 02:31 PM. (go) (view) Notus Wind commented in entry 'If at first you don't succeed' on 09/02/10, 02:22 PM. (go) (view) Buzz Killer commented in entry 'Machete Ex Machina' on 09/02/10, 02:13 PM. (go) (view) Leon Haller commented in entry 'The Ontology of Mind: The Gödelian Argument' on 09/02/10, 02:04 PM. (go) (view) GoyAmongYou commented in entry 'I nose who you are' on 09/02/10, 02:01 PM. (go) (view) Thorn commented in entry 'The Ontology of Mind: The Gödelian Argument' on 09/02/10, 01:56 PM. (go) (view) Leon Haller commented in entry 'If at first you don't succeed' on 09/02/10, 01:52 PM. (go) (view) Al Birah commented in entry 'Are Jews White?' on 09/02/10, 01:42 PM. (go) (view) Leon Haller commented in entry 'If at first you don't succeed' on 09/02/10, 01:39 PM. (go) (view) danielj commented in entry 'The Ontology of Mind: The Gödelian Argument' on 09/02/10, 12:48 PM. (go) (view) danielj commented in entry 'The Ontology of Mind: The Gödelian Argument' on 09/02/10, 12:45 PM. (go) (view) qwery commented in entry 'The Ontology of Mind: The Gödelian Argument' on 09/02/10, 12:43 PM. (go) (view) Mark Dawson commented in entry 'Machete Ex Machina' on 09/02/10, 10:49 AM. (go) (view) Leon Haller commented in entry 'None dare call it White genocide' on 09/02/10, 10:35 AM. (go) (view) Leon Haller commented in entry 'None dare call it White genocide' on 09/02/10, 10:27 AM. (go) (view) Leon Haller commented in entry 'None dare call it White genocide' on 09/02/10, 09:58 AM. (go) (view) Leon Haller commented in entry 'Machete Ex Machina' on 09/02/10, 09:09 AM. (go) (view) Guessedworker commented in entry 'The Ontology of Mind: The Gödelian Argument' on 09/02/10, 08:19 AM. (go) (view) Grimoire commented in entry 'The Ontology of Mind: The Gödelian Argument' on 09/02/10, 08:02 AM. (go) (view) Grimoire commented in entry 'The Ontology of Mind: The Gödelian Argument' on 09/02/10, 06:19 AM. (go) (view) Randy Garver commented in entry 'If at first you don't succeed' on 09/02/10, 04:28 AM. (go) (view) Notus Wind commented in entry 'The Ontology of Mind: The Gödelian Argument' on 09/02/10, 03:56 AM. (go) (view) Thorn commented in entry 'The Ontology of Mind: The Gödelian Argument' on 09/02/10, 03:28 AM. (go) (view) Thorn commented in entry 'The Ontology of Mind: The Gödelian Argument' on 09/02/10, 03:18 AM. (go) (view) uh commented in entry 'The Ontology of Mind: The Gödelian Argument' on 09/02/10, 02:52 AM. (go) (view) Recent Posts
General NewsScience NewsScience CategoriesAll CategoriesThe WritersEach author's name links to a list of all articles posted by the writer; the hashes link to authors' homepages. LinksEndorsement not implied. Crime General
Immigration
Islam Jews
Nationalist Political Parties
New Right Science Whites in Africa | |