Obama, because that’s who Zionists don’t trust

The manipulation of the American political machine is the sole privilege of Jews.  Everyone knows that.  Or rather, everyone in the American political machine knows that, of course.  But nobody else should, and no one needs to.  And really, what’s it to ordinary disempowered Americans where policy comes from?  Nothing whatsoever.

Brave little Israel they must know about, of course ... the Holocaust ... MLK ... white guilt.  That sort of thing.

But the Israel Lobby?  Are you nuts?

So here, from a couple of years ago, is Eliot Cohen in the Washington Post ritually demonising the Walt & Mearsheimer paper out of existence.  He hopes.

Inept, even kooky academic work, then, but is it anti-Semitic?  If by anti-Semitism one means obsessive and irrationally hostile beliefs about Jews; if one accuses them of disloyalty, subversion or treachery, of having occult powers and of participating in secret combinations that manipulate institutions and governments; if one systematically selects everything unfair, ugly or wrong about Jews as individuals or a group and equally systematically suppresses any exculpatory information—why, yes, this paper is anti-Semitic.

Trouble is, those three little words “The Israel Lobby” have escaped into the public consciousness and cannot so easily be recalled, especially while some dumb Jewish journalist can lose the plot as royally as Dana Milbank did.  Reporting for the Post on a public meeting last Monday called by a “group of Jewish leaders” to discuss the 2008 presidential election, he actually wrote:-

The Audacity of Chutzpah

... Daroff said he had “heard in the hallways here” that Obama “doesn’t see the U.S.-Israel relationship as much of the mainstream of the Senate or the Jewish community sees it.”

Kurtzer [supporter Obama - Ed] blamed such sentiment on “attack dogs” and writers of scurrilous e-mails. “He’s right within the mainstream of American society and Jewish community concerns.”

... Next question to Kurtzer: Obama’s assertion that he needn’t have a “Likud view”—that of Israel’s right-wing party—to be pro-Israel. Kurtzer explained that Obama wanted to see a “plurality of views.” Silence in the room.

To that, Lewis [supporting Hilary - Ed] retorted: “The role of the president of the United States is to support the decisions that are made by the people of Israel. It is not up to us to pick and choose from among the political parties.” The audience members applauded.

So let’s run that thought-crime from Ann Lewis by once more.  Remember, this is a senior advisor to the Lizard Queen speaking.

“The role of the president of the United States is to support the decisions that are made by the people of Israel.  It is not up to us to pick and choose from among the political parties.”

Well, it didn’t go down too swimmingly with the goy readers of the Post.  The really interesting thing is the number of commenters in the long thread to the article who understand all about the Lobby.  The outrage speaks for itself.  One comment, from EdFromNH, stands above the rest for its articulacy:-

That comment, by Ann Lewis, one of Hillary Clinton’s most trusted aides and the other comments recorded in Dana Milbank’s enlightening article “The Audacity of Chutzpah,” prove the current treasonous extreme of America’s pro-Israeli lobby—the lobby many say is the most powerful in America—the lobby that many believe almost single-handedly pushed America into its ill-considered and ill-fated war in Iraq.

This lobby has now become so hyper-arrogant that they claim it is the “duty” of the President of the United States to support the will of the electorate of a foreign state no matter how much it might conflict with the interests of America. They are, in effect, demanding that any candidate for President must surrender America’s sovereignty to Israel, a state founded for the purpose of discriminating against people based on whether or not they are Jewish.

My family was in the media. We repeatedly received letters from Rabbis, co-signed by all our Jewish sponsors, threatening to put us out of business unless we carried pro-Israeli or pro-Jewish propaganda, which we did. If you understand the power of the pro-Israeli lobby, not only in Washington, but also in the news media, the article “The Audacity of Chutzpah” explains why Barak Obama is being smeared by certain loud voices in our media.

Now, let’s get real.  EdFromNH is sufficient of a bien pensant to still believe in the fundamental goodness of Man, meaning in this instance Dana Milbank and all the Jews who did not sign those threatening letters.  He has no real conception of ethnicity, and misses the Manichean character of genetic interests and resource competition.  So, inevitably, he reaches for an abstract, liberalistic measure of the good, and concludes that “Zionism and anti-Semitism are evil twins.  They are both ideologies founded on discriminating against people based on whether or not they are Jewish.” He appeals to American Jewry to “condemn the offensive discrimination, censorship, McCarthy-like smear campaigns, and treason of the Zionist-racists who force our politicians to subject the sovereignty of America to the will of Israeli voters.”

So despite experiencing the sharp end of Jewish activism, EdFromNH is none too sharp on the JQ.  He displays no interest in escaping his cocoon of comfortable illusion.  Probably he will never escape.  But the one thing that might encourage him - and those millions like him - would be the four-year get-down of the black son of Dar al-Harb in the Oval Office.  Neither Clinton Two, the Horror Movie nor Lie Hard offer quite the same heady mix of stress fractures between the “sole manipulators” and the “soul manipulator”, as well as between the White House and white America.

If I had a vote on 4th November 2008 - and of course I do not - I would cast it for whoever would unwittingly do the most for my people.  He’s black.  That’s how dire the choice is.

Posted by Guessedworker on Friday, March 21, 2008 at 10:12 AM in U.S. Politics
Comments (11) | Tell a friend

Comments:

Posted by Nux Gnomica on March 22, 2008, 05:20 PM | #

If I had a vote on 4th November 2008 - and of course I do not - I would cast it for whoever would unwittingly do the most for my people.  He’s black.  That’s how dire the choice is.

Larry Auster has been arguing the same:

If it is our fate to get a lesson in racial reality, then Bring It On

As weird as it is to say it, Hillary is the closest thing to a normal, sane, human being in this race. She is our only rescue from the madness of McCain and the madness of Obama, the man of a thousand faces and no face. But if Hillary (or, if you want to believe John Derbyshire’s scenario, Gore, who is certifiably crazy) can’t stop Obama, then I still say there’s a silver lining, or, dare I say it, a white lining, in that dark cloud: a four year long post-OJ Simpson acquittal extravaganza, in which the full madness and idiocy of black America is on display, and America gets a lesson in racial reality it remembers for generations.

http://amnation.com/vfr/

Posted by Honky McCracker on March 22, 2008, 06:31 PM | #

I agree, bring on the niggerfuxation.

Posted by Martin Luther Coon Jr. on March 22, 2008, 07:12 PM | #

Honky McCracker said: “I agree, bring on the niggerfuxation.”

Yes, bring it on! What do we have to lose?

We know Juan McManiac will probably usher in a nuclear war.

The Great Red Queen will mix a poisonous socialist cocktail heavily flavored with anti-white-maleness...and force all to drink it.

BO, as much as his anti-whitey propensities stinks like rotting KFC on a hot summer night, his presidency may shock the brainwashed white zombie masses out of their collective trance?

Posted by Svyatoslav Igorevich on March 23, 2008, 04:07 PM | #

I’ve spent the last few months trying to internally argue against the “worse is better” meme vis-a-vis B’lack O’rama, and I’m losing.

What a clusterfuck…

Posted by Al Ross on March 29, 2008, 12:51 PM | #

The White American boobs who vote Democrat are permitted a choice of Jewish views. On the one hand there is Mrs Clinton’s hard-driving Campaign Director of Communications, Howard Wolfson and on the other the Mulatto Obama’s Special Adviser on the Middle East, a Jew with the racially misleading name of Dennis Ross.

Posted by Fred Scrooby on March 29, 2008, 02:10 PM | #

Regarding Al Ross’s comment, the GOP is also thick with open-borders Jews.  What Jews do is make sure that no matter which party or individual wins an election, they control certain briefs:  policy toward Israel of course, and immigration.  Those two briefs they absolutely make certain they control come hell or high water, no matter whom they’re working for, communists, Nazis, Republikahns, Dhimmicrats, Libertardians, you-name-it-they’ve-got-control-of-those-two-briefs-under-it.  To get and keep control of those two briefs they’ll go to any lengths, spend fortunes, lie, cheat, steal, swindle, push their own grandmother off a cliff but they’ll not let those two briefs get out of Jewish control.  It’s almost as it it was written into the Protocols of the Elders of Zion.  (I think it was, actually.) All Jews (with the sole exception of true American patriots David ben Moshe and Chaim ben Pesach and the organization they head, the Jewish Task Force, jtf.org) being open-borders fanatics, we’ll never get closed borders again until we wrest control of the immigration brief away from Hebrew clutches (that or get it into JTF clutches, either one).  As Jürgen Graf has said, in the U.S.K., the U.K., and France Jews control both the government and the opposition.  So, no matter who sits before the levers of power Jews have control over immigration policy, therefore no matter which party or individual wins the election the country gets open borders forced on it.

Posted by Fred Scrooby on March 29, 2008, 02:17 PM | #

Excuse me, where I put “briefs” in my above comment I should have said “portfolios.” (After long years away from living in Europe I’ve lost my feel for some of the terminolgy over there.)

Posted by Lurker on March 30, 2008, 12:27 AM | #

No worries Fred, the meaning is still crystal clear.

Posted by Desmond Jones on February 11, 2009, 06:34 PM | #

Report: Zinni ambassadorship ixnayed by Israel lobby

Another ex-CIA guy. Philip Giraldi, writing at American Conservative blog, on a report that good Anthony Zinni was to be named Ambassador to Iraq, and shook Hillary’s hand on that, till the lobby reared its hydra heads:
I have been informed by a State Department contact that Zinni was rejected after Clinton came under pressure from some major supporters in New York State who told her that the appointment was unacceptable to Israel because Zinni is perceived as “hostile” to the Jewish state.  Zinni has, indeed, been critical of Israel on a number of occasions.  Another source in the intelligence community has told me that Zinni was perceived as bad for Israel’s security because Israel regards Iraq as a “front line state” in its confrontation with Iran.  If Israel were to attack Iran it would need overflight approval over Iraq, something that Zinni would be unlikely to approve, possibly even submitting his resignation to stop such a development.

Posted by Fred Scrooby on February 11, 2009, 08:50 PM | #

Desmond exposes here a naked example of Jewish control over the U.S. government, for those skeptics who still think Jews don’t get what they want on two issues they deem of central importance to their tribe, 1) open borders and forced race-replacement, and 2) Israel.  Immense Jewish resourced are mobilized by them to ensure they get what they want in these two areas.

Posted by Fred Scrooby on February 11, 2009, 08:51 PM | #

(In that last comment I was referring to Desmond’s comment just above.)

Post a Comment:

Name: (required)

Email: (required but not displayed)

URL: (optional)

Smileys

You must prefix http://anonym.to/? to gnxp.com links...
e.g., http://anonym.to/?http://www.gnxp.com/...

Copy your comment to the clipboard or paste it somewhere before submitting
it just in case the software loses it because the session time has been exceeded.

Remember my personal information

Notify me of follow-up comments?

Submit the word you see below: (not needed for preview)

captcha shown here

Next entry: Misology in America Part 4 - Gender

Previous entry: Jewish civil rights activist's poem to Obama

image of the day

Existential Issues

Of note

Majority Radio

Recent Comments

Guessedworker commented in entry 'The Ontology of Mind: The Gödelian Argument' on 09/02/10, 10:37 PM. (go) (view)

Guessedworker commented in entry 'The Ontology of Mind: The Gödelian Argument' on 09/02/10, 09:59 PM. (go) (view)

Desmond Jones commented in entry 'The Ontology of Mind: The Gödelian Argument' on 09/02/10, 09:06 PM. (go) (view)

Raymond Bradly commented in entry 'Jews: jewish hand-wringing at recent high' on 09/02/10, 09:02 PM. (go) (view)

James Bowery commented in entry 'The Ontology of Mind: The Gödelian Argument' on 09/02/10, 08:45 PM. (go) (view)

Guessedworker commented in entry 'The Ontology of Mind: The Gödelian Argument' on 09/02/10, 08:14 PM. (go) (view)

PF commented in entry 'Machete Ex Machina' on 09/02/10, 06:32 PM. (go) (view)

PF commented in entry 'The Ontology of Mind: The Gödelian Argument' on 09/02/10, 06:28 PM. (go) (view)

John commented in entry 'Machete Ex Machina' on 09/02/10, 03:30 PM. (go) (view)

Notus Wind commented in entry 'The Ontology of Mind: The Gödelian Argument' on 09/02/10, 02:42 PM. (go) (view)

Notus Wind commented in entry 'The Ontology of Mind: The Gödelian Argument' on 09/02/10, 02:31 PM. (go) (view)

Notus Wind commented in entry 'If at first you don't succeed' on 09/02/10, 02:22 PM. (go) (view)

Buzz Killer commented in entry 'Machete Ex Machina' on 09/02/10, 02:13 PM. (go) (view)

Leon Haller commented in entry 'The Ontology of Mind: The Gödelian Argument' on 09/02/10, 02:04 PM. (go) (view)

GoyAmongYou commented in entry 'I nose who you are' on 09/02/10, 02:01 PM. (go) (view)

Thorn commented in entry 'The Ontology of Mind: The Gödelian Argument' on 09/02/10, 01:56 PM. (go) (view)

Leon Haller commented in entry 'If at first you don't succeed' on 09/02/10, 01:52 PM. (go) (view)

Al Birah commented in entry 'Are Jews White?' on 09/02/10, 01:42 PM. (go) (view)

Leon Haller commented in entry 'If at first you don't succeed' on 09/02/10, 01:39 PM. (go) (view)

danielj commented in entry 'The Ontology of Mind: The Gödelian Argument' on 09/02/10, 12:48 PM. (go) (view)

danielj commented in entry 'The Ontology of Mind: The Gödelian Argument' on 09/02/10, 12:45 PM. (go) (view)

qwery commented in entry 'The Ontology of Mind: The Gödelian Argument' on 09/02/10, 12:43 PM. (go) (view)

Mark Dawson commented in entry 'Machete Ex Machina' on 09/02/10, 10:49 AM. (go) (view)

Leon Haller commented in entry 'None dare call it White genocide' on 09/02/10, 10:35 AM. (go) (view)

Leon Haller commented in entry 'None dare call it White genocide' on 09/02/10, 10:27 AM. (go) (view)

Leon Haller commented in entry 'None dare call it White genocide' on 09/02/10, 09:58 AM. (go) (view)

Leon Haller commented in entry 'Machete Ex Machina' on 09/02/10, 09:09 AM. (go) (view)

Guessedworker commented in entry 'The Ontology of Mind: The Gödelian Argument' on 09/02/10, 08:19 AM. (go) (view)

Grimoire commented in entry 'The Ontology of Mind: The Gödelian Argument' on 09/02/10, 08:02 AM. (go) (view)

Grimoire commented in entry 'The Ontology of Mind: The Gödelian Argument' on 09/02/10, 06:19 AM. (go) (view)

Randy Garver commented in entry 'If at first you don't succeed' on 09/02/10, 04:28 AM. (go) (view)

Notus Wind commented in entry 'The Ontology of Mind: The Gödelian Argument' on 09/02/10, 03:56 AM. (go) (view)

Thorn commented in entry 'The Ontology of Mind: The Gödelian Argument' on 09/02/10, 03:28 AM. (go) (view)

Thorn commented in entry 'The Ontology of Mind: The Gödelian Argument' on 09/02/10, 03:18 AM. (go) (view)

uh commented in entry 'The Ontology of Mind: The Gödelian Argument' on 09/02/10, 02:52 AM. (go) (view)

General News

Science News

The Writers

Each author's name links to a list of all articles posted by the writer; the hashes link to authors' homepages.

Links

Endorsement not implied.

Crime

General

Immigration

Islam

Jews

Nationalist Political Parties

New Right

Science

Whites in Africa