Obama, because that’s who Zionists don’t trust

The manipulation of the American political machine is the sole privilege of Jews.  Everyone knows that.  Or rather, everyone in the American political machine knows that, of course.  But nobody else should, and no one needs to.  And really, what’s it to ordinary disempowered Americans where policy comes from?  Nothing whatsoever.

Brave little Israel they must know about, of course ... the Holocaust ... MLK ... white guilt.  That sort of thing.

But the Israel Lobby?  Are you nuts?

So here, from a couple of years ago, is Eliot Cohen in the Washington Post ritually demonising the Walt & Mearsheimer paper out of existence.  He hopes.

Inept, even kooky academic work, then, but is it anti-Semitic?  If by anti-Semitism one means obsessive and irrationally hostile beliefs about Jews; if one accuses them of disloyalty, subversion or treachery, of having occult powers and of participating in secret combinations that manipulate institutions and governments; if one systematically selects everything unfair, ugly or wrong about Jews as individuals or a group and equally systematically suppresses any exculpatory information—why, yes, this paper is anti-Semitic.

Trouble is, those three little words “The Israel Lobby” have escaped into the public consciousness and cannot so easily be recalled, especially while some dumb Jewish journalist can lose the plot as royally as Dana Milbank did.  Reporting for the Post on a public meeting last Monday called by a “group of Jewish leaders” to discuss the 2008 presidential election, he actually wrote:-

The Audacity of Chutzpah

... Daroff said he had “heard in the hallways here” that Obama “doesn’t see the U.S.-Israel relationship as much of the mainstream of the Senate or the Jewish community sees it.”

Kurtzer [supporter Obama - Ed] blamed such sentiment on “attack dogs” and writers of scurrilous e-mails. “He’s right within the mainstream of American society and Jewish community concerns.”

... Next question to Kurtzer: Obama’s assertion that he needn’t have a “Likud view”—that of Israel’s right-wing party—to be pro-Israel. Kurtzer explained that Obama wanted to see a “plurality of views.” Silence in the room.

To that, Lewis [supporting Hilary - Ed] retorted: “The role of the president of the United States is to support the decisions that are made by the people of Israel. It is not up to us to pick and choose from among the political parties.” The audience members applauded.

So let’s run that thought-crime from Ann Lewis by once more.  Remember, this is a senior advisor to the Lizard Queen speaking.

“The role of the president of the United States is to support the decisions that are made by the people of Israel.  It is not up to us to pick and choose from among the political parties.”

Well, it didn’t go down too swimmingly with the goy readers of the Post.  The really interesting thing is the number of commenters in the long thread to the article who understand all about the Lobby.  The outrage speaks for itself.  One comment, from EdFromNH, stands above the rest for its articulacy:-

That comment, by Ann Lewis, one of Hillary Clinton’s most trusted aides and the other comments recorded in Dana Milbank’s enlightening article “The Audacity of Chutzpah,” prove the current treasonous extreme of America’s pro-Israeli lobby—the lobby many say is the most powerful in America—the lobby that many believe almost single-handedly pushed America into its ill-considered and ill-fated war in Iraq.

This lobby has now become so hyper-arrogant that they claim it is the “duty” of the President of the United States to support the will of the electorate of a foreign state no matter how much it might conflict with the interests of America. They are, in effect, demanding that any candidate for President must surrender America’s sovereignty to Israel, a state founded for the purpose of discriminating against people based on whether or not they are Jewish.

My family was in the media. We repeatedly received letters from Rabbis, co-signed by all our Jewish sponsors, threatening to put us out of business unless we carried pro-Israeli or pro-Jewish propaganda, which we did. If you understand the power of the pro-Israeli lobby, not only in Washington, but also in the news media, the article “The Audacity of Chutzpah” explains why Barak Obama is being smeared by certain loud voices in our media.

Now, let’s get real.  EdFromNH is sufficient of a bien pensant to still believe in the fundamental goodness of Man, meaning in this instance Dana Milbank and all the Jews who did not sign those threatening letters.  He has no real conception of ethnicity, and misses the Manichean character of genetic interests and resource competition.  So, inevitably, he reaches for an abstract, liberalistic measure of the good, and concludes that “Zionism and anti-Semitism are evil twins.  They are both ideologies founded on discriminating against people based on whether or not they are Jewish.” He appeals to American Jewry to “condemn the offensive discrimination, censorship, McCarthy-like smear campaigns, and treason of the Zionist-racists who force our politicians to subject the sovereignty of America to the will of Israeli voters.”

So despite experiencing the sharp end of Jewish activism, EdFromNH is none too sharp on the JQ.  He displays no interest in escaping his cocoon of comfortable illusion.  Probably he will never escape.  But the one thing that might encourage him - and those millions like him - would be the four-year get-down of the black son of Dar al-Harb in the Oval Office.  Neither Clinton Two, the Horror Movie nor Lie Hard offer quite the same heady mix of stress fractures between the “sole manipulators” and the “soul manipulator”, as well as between the White House and white America.

If I had a vote on 4th November 2008 - and of course I do not - I would cast it for whoever would unwittingly do the most for my people.  He’s black.  That’s how dire the choice is.

Posted by Guessedworker on Friday, March 21, 2008 at 10:12 AM in U.S. Politics
Comments (8) | Tell-a-Friend

The trackback URL for this entry is: Trackbacks are disabled for this entry

Trackbacks:

No trackbacks yet.

Comments:

Page 1 of 1 pages


If I had a vote on 4th November 2008 - and of course I do not - I would cast it for whoever would unwittingly do the most for my people.  He’s black.  That’s how dire the choice is.

Larry Auster has been arguing the same:

If it is our fate to get a lesson in racial reality, then Bring It On

As weird as it is to say it, Hillary is the closest thing to a normal, sane, human being in this race. She is our only rescue from the madness of McCain and the madness of Obama, the man of a thousand faces and no face. But if Hillary (or, if you want to believe John Derbyshire’s scenario, Gore, who is certifiably crazy) can’t stop Obama, then I still say there’s a silver lining, or, dare I say it, a white lining, in that dark cloud: a four year long post-OJ Simpson acquittal extravaganza, in which the full madness and idiocy of black America is on display, and America gets a lesson in racial reality it remembers for generations.

http://amnation.com/vfr/

Posted by Nux Gnomica on Saturday, March 22, 2008 at 05:20 PM | #


I agree, bring on the niggerfuxation.

Posted by Honky McCracker on Saturday, March 22, 2008 at 06:31 PM | #


Honky McCracker said: “I agree, bring on the niggerfuxation.”

Yes, bring it on! What do we have to lose?

We know Juan McManiac will probably usher in a nuclear war.

The Great Red Queen will mix a poisonous socialist cocktail heavily flavored with anti-white-maleness...and force all to drink it.

BO, as much as his anti-whitey propensities stinks like rotting KFC on a hot summer night, his presidency may shock the brainwashed white zombie masses out of their collective trance?

Posted by Martin Luther Coon Jr. on Saturday, March 22, 2008 at 07:12 PM | #


I’ve spent the last few months trying to internally argue against the “worse is better” meme vis-a-vis B’lack O’rama, and I’m losing.

What a clusterfuck…

Posted by Svyatoslav Igorevich on Sunday, March 23, 2008 at 04:07 PM | #


The White American boobs who vote Democrat are permitted a choice of Jewish views. On the one hand there is Mrs Clinton’s hard-driving Campaign Director of Communications, Howard Wolfson and on the other the Mulatto Obama’s Special Adviser on the Middle East, a Jew with the racially misleading name of Dennis Ross.

Posted by Al Ross on Saturday, March 29, 2008 at 12:51 PM | #


Regarding Al Ross’s comment, the GOP is also thick with open-borders Jews.  What Jews do is make sure that no matter which party or individual wins an election, they control certain briefs:  policy toward Israel of course, and immigration.  Those two briefs they absolutely make certain they control come hell or high water, no matter whom they’re working for, communists, Nazis, Republikahns, Dhimmicrats, Libertardians, you-name-it-they’ve-got-control-of-those-two-briefs-under-it.  To get and keep control of those two briefs they’ll go to any lengths, spend fortunes, lie, cheat, steal, swindle, push their own grandmother off a cliff but they’ll not let those two briefs get out of Jewish control.  It’s almost as it it was written into the Protocols of the Elders of Zion.  (I think it was, actually.) All Jews (with the sole exception of true American patriots David ben Moshe and Chaim ben Pesach and the organization they head, the Jewish Task Force, jtf.org) being open-borders fanatics, we’ll never get closed borders again until we wrest control of the immigration brief away from Hebrew clutches (that or get it into JTF clutches, either one).  As Jürgen Graf has said, in the U.S.K., the U.K., and France Jews control both the government and the opposition.  So, no matter who sits before the levers of power Jews have control over immigration policy, therefore no matter which party or individual wins the election the country gets open borders forced on it.

Posted by Fred Scrooby on Saturday, March 29, 2008 at 02:10 PM | #


Excuse me, where I put “briefs” in my above comment I should have said “portfolios.” (After long years away from living in Europe I’ve lost my feel for some of the terminolgy over there.)

Posted by Fred Scrooby on Saturday, March 29, 2008 at 02:17 PM | #


No worries Fred, the meaning is still crystal clear.

Posted by Lurker on Sunday, March 30, 2008 at 12:27 AM | #

Page 1 of 1 pages

Post a Comment:

Name: (required)

Email: (required; will not be displayed)

URL: (optional)

Smileys

# MR's comment software uses session-timing, and may destroy your comment if your browser window
has been left open too long. It's best to copy your comment and refresh the page before submitting it.
# You must prefix http://www.anonym.to/? to gnxp.com links;
For example http://www.anonym.to/?http://www.gnxp.com/...

Remember my personal information

Notify me of follow-up comments?

Enter the word you see below to submit your comment; you do not need to enter it in order to preview your comment.

captcha shown here

image of the day

Most Recent Comments

John commented in entry 'What WN wants from Obama and what the SPLC wants are not the same' on 11/19/08, 10:58 AM. (#)

barbiplease commented in entry 'Why "The Political Compass" Is Inherently Vectorist and How to Correct It' on 11/19/08, 10:35 AM. (#)

Desmond Jones commented in entry 'What WN wants from Obama and what the SPLC wants are not the same' on 11/19/08, 04:07 AM. (#)

Meandering commented in entry 'What WN wants from Obama and what the SPLC wants are not the same' on 11/19/08, 03:28 AM. (#)

Tania commented in entry 'Maggots feeding on the body of art' on 11/19/08, 03:10 AM. (#)

Guessedworker commented in entry 'What WN wants from Obama and what the SPLC wants are not the same' on 11/19/08, 01:33 AM. (#)

Captainchaos commented in entry 'What WN wants from Obama and what the SPLC wants are not the same' on 11/19/08, 01:02 AM. (#)

danielj commented in entry 'What WN wants from Obama and what the SPLC wants are not the same' on 11/19/08, 12:53 AM. (#)

Captainchaos commented in entry 'What WN wants from Obama and what the SPLC wants are not the same' on 11/19/08, 12:42 AM. (#)

Guest commented in entry 'What WN wants from Obama and what the SPLC wants are not the same' on 11/19/08, 12:31 AM. (#)

Thunder commented in entry '"race war" From Google Trends' on 11/19/08, 12:10 AM. (#)

a Finn commented in entry 'What WN wants from Obama and what the SPLC wants are not the same' on 11/19/08, 12:08 AM. (#)

Desmond Jones commented in entry 'What WN wants from Obama and what the SPLC wants are not the same' on 11/18/08, 11:05 PM. (#)

Jean West commented in entry 'American Secessionist Convention' on 11/18/08, 11:04 PM. (#)

James Bowery commented in entry 'What WN wants from Obama and what the SPLC wants are not the same' on 11/18/08, 10:02 PM. (#)

Captainchaos commented in entry 'What WN wants from Obama and what the SPLC wants are not the same' on 11/18/08, 09:53 PM. (#)

a Finn commented in entry 'What WN wants from Obama and what the SPLC wants are not the same' on 11/18/08, 09:14 PM. (#)

Svyatoslav Igorevich commented in entry 'What WN wants from Obama and what the SPLC wants are not the same' on 11/18/08, 09:10 PM. (#)

Desmond Jones commented in entry 'What WN wants from Obama and what the SPLC wants are not the same' on 11/18/08, 08:53 PM. (#)

a Finn commented in entry 'Jonathan Bowden on Marxism and the Frankfurt School' on 11/18/08, 08:06 PM. (#)

Desmond Jones commented in entry 'What WN wants from Obama and what the SPLC wants are not the same' on 11/18/08, 08:05 PM. (#)

Dave Johns commented in entry 'What WN wants from Obama and what the SPLC wants are not the same' on 11/18/08, 07:17 PM. (#)

James Bowery commented in entry 'What WN wants from Obama and what the SPLC wants are not the same' on 11/18/08, 06:32 PM. (#)

a Finn commented in entry 'What WN wants from Obama and what the SPLC wants are not the same' on 11/18/08, 06:12 PM. (#)

a Finn commented in entry 'What WN wants from Obama and what the SPLC wants are not the same' on 11/18/08, 05:40 PM. (#)

James Bowery commented in entry 'What WN wants from Obama and what the SPLC wants are not the same' on 11/18/08, 05:29 PM. (#)

James Bowery commented in entry 'What WN wants from Obama and what the SPLC wants are not the same' on 11/18/08, 05:07 PM. (#)

silver commented in entry 'What WN wants from Obama and what the SPLC wants are not the same' on 11/18/08, 04:38 PM. (#)

Dave Johns commented in entry 'What WN wants from Obama and what the SPLC wants are not the same' on 11/18/08, 03:27 PM. (#)

Fred Scrooby commented in entry 'What WN wants from Obama and what the SPLC wants are not the same' on 11/18/08, 03:26 PM. (#)

silver commented in entry 'What WN wants from Obama and what the SPLC wants are not the same' on 11/18/08, 03:04 PM. (#)

Fred Scrooby commented in entry 'What WN wants from Obama and what the SPLC wants are not the same' on 11/18/08, 02:52 PM. (#)

Dave Johns commented in entry 'What WN wants from Obama and what the SPLC wants are not the same' on 11/18/08, 01:57 PM. (#)

silver commented in entry 'What WN wants from Obama and what the SPLC wants are not the same' on 11/18/08, 01:34 PM. (#)

jenny commented in entry 'Bethlehem by Liverpool and Gravesend' on 11/18/08, 01:16 PM. (#)

The Writers

Each author's name links to a list of all articles posted by the writer; the hashes link to authors' homepages.

Links

Endorsement not implied.

Crime

EGI

General

Immigration

Islam

Jews

Nationalist Political Parties

New Right

Science

Whites in Africa