Jay & Gay

Many readers will have already come across this famous statement by John Jay on the founding of the US:

“It has often given me pleasure to observe that independent America was not composed of detached and distant territories, but that one connected, fertile, widespreading country was the portion of our western sons of liberty ... A succession of navigable waters forms a kind of chain round its borders, as if to bind it together ...

“With equal pleasure I have as often taken notice that Providence has been pleased to give this one connected country to one united people - a people descended from the same ancestors, speaking the same language, professing the same religion, attached to the same principles of government, very similar in their manners and customs ...”

Jay was a founding father of America who became the first Chief Justice of the US Supreme Court. In what he writes above, he is entirely at odds with both the modern left-wing emphasis on multiculturalism and diversity, and the right-wing ideal of a nation founded purely on common political values.

Instead, he finds it important - even to the point of seeing it as religiously providential - that the US was founded with a unity of both people and place. In other words, a nation is justified in its existence when it consists of one connected land forming a home to one connected people.

If we jump forward a century from 1788 to the 1890s, we find that it was Australia’s turn to debate the issue of federation. One of the most important advocates for Australian federation was the poet William Gay. His most famous contribution was the following poem, in which he attacks the customs houses on the colonial borders as representing a divisive greed and selfishness.

From all division let our land be free,
For God has made her one: complete she lies
Within the unbroken circle of the skies,
And round her indivisible the sea
Breaks on her single shore; while only we,
Her foster children, bound with sacred ties
Of one dear blood, one storied enterprise,
Are negligent of her integrity. -
Her seamless garment, at great Mammon’s nod,
With hands unfilial we have basely rent,
With petty variance our souls are spent,
And ancient kinship under foot is trod:
O let us rise, united, penitent,
And be one people, - mighty, serving God!

This poem was quoted by the leading politician of the age, Alfred Deakin, a future Prime Minister, to launch the case for federation in Victoria in 1898.

What strikes me about the poem is how similar it is in basic philosophy to the thoughts of John Jay. Again, what is stressed is the idea that God has given one connected land to one connected people, and that this is the basis of national life, national purpose and national responsibility.

So never let anyone claim that the idea of traditional nationalism has not had a respectable place within the English-speaking political tradition. It is there in John Jay, and it is there in a different country and a different century in the words of William Gay.

Posted by Guest Blogger on Tuesday, November 22, 2005 at 06:10 AM in Australian Politics
Comments (4) | Tell a friend

Comments:

Posted by Ventris on November 22, 2005, 09:25 AM | #

Contrast the above with the comments of this eager French Canadian statesman during the Confederational debates of the 1860’s, entirely consistent with our modern ethos:

“I propose the adoption of the rainbow as our emblem. By the endless variety of its tints the rainbow will give an excellent idea of the diversity of races, religions, sentiments, and interests of the different parts of the Confederation. By its slender and elongated form the rainbow would afford a perfect representation of the geographical configuration of the Confederation. By its lack of consistence - an image without substance - the rainbow would represent aptly the solidity of our Confederation. An emblem we must have, for every great empire has one; let us adopt the rainbow.”

-Henri Joly de Lotbiniere, legislative assembly of Canada, 20 Feb. 1865

Posted by James Bowery on November 22, 2005, 12:10 PM | #

diversity of races, religions, sentiments, and interests of the different parts of the Confederation

So Even Henri Joly de lLotbiniere would have had no problem with ethnostates.

Posted by Desmond Jones on November 22, 2005, 03:36 PM | #

Read it with sarcasm mode on Ventris-it’s tongue in cheek-“By its lack of consistence - an image without substance - the rainbow would represent aptly the solidity of our Confederation.”-not.

Posted by AD on November 23, 2005, 06:06 AM | #

Off topic hawking(not on my behalf):

Any Aussies interested in what went on at the Sydney Forum can now get the 3 volume DVD set of the event. Copies are available for $40 + $2 postage(send cheque / money order paid to Sydney Forum at P.O. Box N291 Grosvenor Place 1220).

I’m yet to see it but it should be a fun watch.Alot more effort was put into making sure the DVDs were top notch than the place-holder website i’m sure.
http://sydneyforum.net/

Commenting is not available in this channel entry.

Next entry: MR mkII

Previous entry: Bill Gates invests in ethanol

Existential Issues

White Genocide Project

Of note

General News

Science News

Science Categories

All Categories

The Writers

Each author's name links to a list of all articles posted by the writer; the hashes link to authors' homepages.

Links

Endorsement not implied.

Controlled Opposition

Crime

General

Immigration

Islam

Jews

Nationalist Political Parties

Science

Whites in Africa