MR Radio: Stan Hess, DanielS and GW discuss the seventies and activism today

Posted by Guessedworker on Tuesday, 30 September 2014 08:16.

                                    stanhess
On the radio page: Stan Hess, formerly of Voice of Reason Radio, discusses his colourful life with DanielS and GW, shares with Daniel an outsider’s memories of the Berkeley - San Francisco scene of the 1970s, and talks about his activism today:

http://majorityrights.com/radio/index

kimandme

Tags: MR Radio



Comments:


1

Posted by Guest Blogger on Tue, 30 Sep 2014 16:42 | #

Not getting the link on the radio page


2

Posted by Guessedworker on Tue, 30 Sep 2014 16:55 | #

OK, checking that now.


3

Posted by Guessedworker on Tue, 30 Sep 2014 17:14 | #

OK, the MP3 is streaming.


4

Posted by DanielS on Wed, 01 Oct 2014 19:47 | #

In listening back on this interview, it becomes evident that I need to clarify the hermeneutic circle in order to demonstrate how it can reconcile “intellectualism” with practical application.

I also need to develop the notion of dishonesty and liberalism among males as secondary sexual characteristics, displays of extraneous logical capacity to attract females (the younger of whom find a short term advantage in liberalism as it allows them to play men off of one another; while men being liberal, bespeak a more independent type), similar as upper classes professing “anti-racism” to lord their “moral superiority” over the lower classes who, being more at risk, are not quite so at leisure to make garish displays of liberalism.


And what to do about it when this dishonesty is at odds with E.G.I.

How much pretending liberalism in order to attract a female is too much pretending? As a recent Ted Sallis article at Counter Currents asked (analogously regarding of mainstream “safe politics”)

http://www.counter-currents.com/2014/09/against-mainstreaming

when does the pretense become the real agenda… how many times have we shook are heads to find, “they are serious”.  With that, how much expecting of liberalism of males is unreasonable…

Stan does some fantastic work in presenting European advocacy as common sense. However, he is taking for granted some of his own and others intellectual work in preparation for that step. For example, “The Century of Self.”

I don’t agree with the dismissal of intellectualism and I do side with GW’s belief that we need to rebuild the world in our image as Europeans.

Having grown up basically being surrounded by anti-intellectualism (“it’s all bullshit”) I know all too well that sufficient intellectual bearings are imperative to making sense of the world. To be denied this is a vast, arbitrary disservice and to be put at a disadvantage.

While there is such a thing as “pseudo-intellectualsm” it does not apply where relevance of purpose and appropriate intellectual tools for its end are maintained.

I do believe that Stan should have a point that a perfect distinction should not and cannot be drawn between intellectual theorizing and practical application, but Majority Rights will not be a site that quickly bandies charges of “pseudo-intellectualism.”

Our purposes are at hand and never out of sight.

Having said that, if Stan can abide that in the main, MR will tend to heavily favor the intellectual end over popular implementation, features from his perspective of “world Eury” could complement MR.


5

Posted by Dude on Wed, 01 Oct 2014 23:12 | #

Not sure about this guy, but some of the same territory. Might be an option for an interview:

http://www.staffandscrip.com/pp011.shtml


6

Posted by Dude on Wed, 01 Oct 2014 23:13 | #

NB That piece (Traditionalism is the Only Radicalism) is the title of his latest self-published book.


7

Posted by Thorn(troll) on Wed, 01 Oct 2014 23:36 | #

Thorn, take your own advice and stay away.

My original purpose was to interview Stan.

Then it was suggested that I handle* the bulk of the conversation and I prepared for it that way, though the intro didn’t quite foreshadow that plan.

* A misunderstanding there between “handle”, as in, “do the interviewing” as opposed to “handle” the bulk of the conversation as in “do the bulk of the talking.”

Though it wasn’t my idea, Stan agreed that whatever was fine and improvised with the talk as it turned-out…and it did turn-over some issues, clarifying some, showing others still needing to be clarified. Hence, it was useful.


Dude (5 and 6) John Dunn doesn’t fit with MR’s platform.



8

Posted by DanielS on Sat, 04 Oct 2014 08:15 | #

Renegade noted the fact that Miss Belgium had “converted to Islam.”...but made no mention of what she married to..lots of reverence for the usual regime though…


miscegenation is equivalent to rape.

Footballer from Mali married to Miss Belgium


A point that I had not articulated sufficiently in the Stan Hess conversation: Stan suggested that we European men boycott any sport which smacks of non-White ownership and participants.

That is well and good. A boycott recognized by consensus is not placing undue influence on “individual will”

However, I called attention to the fact that this still places a bit too much weight on the “demand” side.

An analogy can be drawn to telling people that they ought to recycle and change consumer habits in order to control pollution - fine; but while the supply side continues to manufacture invincible garbage and effluent unabated crucial attention needs to be given to the supply sides as well; the same would hold true of sports.


9

Posted by Be-In on Sun, 05 Oct 2014 05:53 | #

The Crown of Creation:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uOrb0G0tw08

Can’t Find My Home:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3TyynO6O0kc


“High Yellow” was a term to refer to Mulattoes in the old south. Here is one homage to a “high yellow guru”

Ella Guru
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DsiDDtX6cdU


Perhaps this one would be better for the more conventional minded mulatto consolationists:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LArGlfEVYqM


10

Posted by Dude on Sun, 05 Oct 2014 15:44 | #

“John Dunn doesn’t fit with MR’s platform.”

DanielS, in a way that was why I thought the discussion would be of interest. A discussion of the benefits and limits of Dunn’s form of pre-liberal traditionalism set against MR’s own POV.

As you know 99% of interviewees on MR don’t “fit with MR’s platform” either, so what’s the beef?


11

Posted by Guessedworker on Sun, 05 Oct 2014 18:02 | #

Dude,

John Dunn is religious.  Really that’s as far as we need to go in examining what he has to say.  It is not possible to interrogate faith, and neither can faith interrogate anything else, since its very being prescribes value and place.  The presumption is always total with faith.




Post a comment:


Name: (required)

Email: (required but not displayed)

URL: (optional)

Note: You should copy your comment to the clipboard or paste it somewhere before submitting it, so that it will not be lost if the session times out.

Remember me


Next entry: A hermeneuticist confronts a sortocracer with a provocative issue
Previous entry: Jewish tricks: paradoxic injunctions, reversal of terms

image of the day

Existential Issues

DNA Nations

Categories

Contributors

Each author's name links to a list of all articles posted by the writer.

Links

Endorsement not implied.

Immigration

Islamist Threat

Anti-white Media Networks

Audio/Video

Crime

Economics

Education

General

Historical Re-Evaluation

Controlled Opposition

Nationalist Political Parties

Science

Europeans in Africa

Of Note

Comments

James Bowery commented in entry 'Out of foundation and into the mind-body problem, part four' on Tue, 19 Mar 2024 02:16. (View)

Thorn commented in entry 'On Spengler and the inevitable' on Mon, 18 Mar 2024 23:20. (View)

Guessedworker commented in entry 'On Spengler and the inevitable' on Mon, 18 Mar 2024 00:31. (View)

Thorn commented in entry 'On Spengler and the inevitable' on Sun, 17 Mar 2024 23:58. (View)

Thorn commented in entry 'A Russian Passion' on Sun, 17 Mar 2024 23:12. (View)

Thorn commented in entry 'Out of foundation and into the mind-body problem, part four' on Sun, 17 Mar 2024 13:01. (View)

Thorn commented in entry 'Out of foundation and into the mind-body problem, part four' on Sun, 17 Mar 2024 12:27. (View)

Al Ross commented in entry 'Out of foundation and into the mind-body problem, part four' on Sun, 17 Mar 2024 08:34. (View)

Al Ross commented in entry 'Patriotic Alternative given the black spot' on Sun, 17 Mar 2024 08:11. (View)

Al Ross commented in entry 'Patriotic Alternative given the black spot' on Sun, 17 Mar 2024 07:20. (View)

Manc commented in entry 'Patriotic Alternative given the black spot' on Sat, 16 Mar 2024 22:29. (View)

Thorn commented in entry 'Patriotic Alternative given the black spot' on Sat, 16 Mar 2024 19:15. (View)

Guessedworker commented in entry 'Patriotic Alternative given the black spot' on Sat, 16 Mar 2024 19:03. (View)

Manc commented in entry 'Patriotic Alternative given the black spot' on Sat, 16 Mar 2024 18:15. (View)

Guessedworker commented in entry 'Patriotic Alternative given the black spot' on Sat, 16 Mar 2024 17:31. (View)

Thorn commented in entry 'Patriotic Alternative given the black spot' on Sat, 16 Mar 2024 12:46. (View)

Thorn commented in entry 'Patriotic Alternative given the black spot' on Sat, 16 Mar 2024 12:27. (View)

Al Ross commented in entry 'Patriotic Alternative given the black spot' on Sat, 16 Mar 2024 07:14. (View)

Al Ross commented in entry 'Patriotic Alternative given the black spot' on Sat, 16 Mar 2024 05:38. (View)

Al Ross commented in entry 'Patriotic Alternative given the black spot' on Sat, 16 Mar 2024 04:54. (View)

Al Ross commented in entry 'Out of foundation and into the mind-body problem, part four' on Sat, 16 Mar 2024 03:51. (View)

Al Ross commented in entry 'Patriotic Alternative given the black spot' on Sat, 16 Mar 2024 03:47. (View)

Al Ross commented in entry 'Patriotic Alternative given the black spot' on Sat, 16 Mar 2024 03:44. (View)

Al Ross commented in entry 'Patriotic Alternative given the black spot' on Sat, 16 Mar 2024 03:39. (View)

Al Ross commented in entry 'What lies at the core' on Sat, 16 Mar 2024 03:28. (View)

Al Ross commented in entry 'Out of foundation and into the mind-body problem, part four' on Sat, 16 Mar 2024 03:19. (View)

Guessedworker commented in entry 'Patriotic Alternative given the black spot' on Fri, 15 Mar 2024 23:34. (View)

Guessedworker commented in entry 'Patriotic Alternative given the black spot' on Fri, 15 Mar 2024 23:32. (View)

Thorn commented in entry 'Patriotic Alternative given the black spot' on Fri, 15 Mar 2024 22:53. (View)

Thorn commented in entry 'Out of foundation and into the mind-body problem, part four' on Wed, 13 Mar 2024 23:04. (View)

James Bowery commented in entry 'Out of foundation and into the mind-body problem, part four' on Wed, 13 Mar 2024 12:35. (View)

Al Ross commented in entry 'Out of foundation and into the mind-body problem, part four' on Wed, 13 Mar 2024 07:44. (View)

Guessedworker commented in entry 'Out of foundation and into the mind-body problem, part four' on Wed, 13 Mar 2024 06:48. (View)

Al Ross commented in entry 'Out of foundation and into the mind-body problem, part four' on Wed, 13 Mar 2024 06:02. (View)

Thorn commented in entry 'Out of foundation and into the mind-body problem, part four' on Tue, 12 Mar 2024 23:17. (View)

affection-tone