The maze – Part 1

Posted by Guest Blogger on Wednesday, 19 March 2014 15:53.

by Neil Vodavzny

I don’t know for sure, but BWS may have intended his print of Icarus:


Icarus, Barry Windsor-Smith, 1981 (Goblimey Galleries)

… in a literal sense. Unlike Psyche – see previous post – and other pre-Raphaelite influenced prints, it employs late-Renaissance techniques. The figure half-disappears into a stream, giving the opportunity for optical effects – reflection, refraction (light bending under water). Lilies float suspended over reflections of tree-trunks giving an odd illusory, photographic quality. In classic or proto-Greek figure-art, there’s no illusion, and a simplicity redolent of art-deco ornament. The pre-Raphaelites strove for the presence of a figure in a landscape to be almost frieze-like. They wanted the power of symbolism, not the illusion of reality.

BWS is known to carry this into his work, being fond of sundials – in The Ram And The Peacock:


The Ram and the Peacock, Barry Windsor-Smith, 1974 (Windsor-Smith Studio)

… where it is used as a symbol of civilized refinement. If you contrast Icarus, there is actually a type of illusion in the fact that it’s more “real”. This is a perennial problem of which the pre-Raphaelites were acutely aware. They wanted the “psycho-culture” of medieval Europe, not the pin-hole captured realism of later Renaissance figures, Caravaggio being the outstanding exponent.

I don’t think Icarus is that great as a pre-Raphaelite image, but it may not have been the intention. There’s a fantastic dichotomy in the whole trend of science from the late Renaissance in that the more we know about reality the less real it gets! BWS, as a medievalist, may be aware of this (Alan Moore’s Watchmen essay, “Blood From The Shoulders Of Pallas” touches on the topic). Psyche


Psyche, Barry Windsor-Smith, 1980 (Windsor-Smith Studio)

… impresses myth with a visceral, tactile, aromatic essence. This is typical of European romance, while the image of Earth reclaiming Icarus seems only too real.

We know that the myth says Daedalus, the crafty inventor who designed his son Icarus’s wings, also built the labyrinth to hold the Minotaur. Technique itself is a type of illusion because in order to have technique you need something to practice the technique on – obviously, that has to be reality. So, what is reality? Something that contains signs – antagonisms of sun, moon, winter, summer, male, female… In order to recognize that reality, we need to appreciate the mythic, racial, sexual origins of culture.

As a for instance, ancient Greek culture is nothing if not erotic. Poseidon punished king Minos by having his wife Pasiphae fall for the white bull he sent, the result being the Minotaur. This type of licentious gaiety distinguishes European culture in its origins from Middle Eastern. I’m not taking it upon myself to describe the origins here, but the point is you have to describe something before you know what’s there. Technique is not description, it’s an illusion or a maze (or Alphaville). By describing something, you are enabled to know the origin point, so in our case it’s what I would call the antagonism of signs such as land/sea, sun/moon, licentious Greek myths (possibly the origins of dramatic comedy?), and the basis of European thought in non-Cartesian reality (tragedy).

The Right are at least attempting the feat, which places us more and more outside the mainstream. We are not led; egalitarian culture is easily led because it’s difficult or impossible to describe. The films of Tati are descriptive because you’re enabled to read in them cultural signs – les petits quartiers choreographed like French ballet. Let me give a personal for instance: I was speaking to an East German artisan about herMiwok/Pomo Californian Indian basket-weaving, and put it to her that we as Europeans are defending traditions in much the same way as an ethnic tribe. She shilly-shallied, saying she was of Polish extraction and various well-meaning non-specifics.

Well, exactly. Modern society is difficult to define in such terms. Because it’s so difficult, the Right are made to seem marginal. Because we’re more marginal, we can’t be led. Because the egalitarian mainstream is easily led, we are seeing an egalitarian techno-verse. This is the technical invention of the liberal elite, or geeks if you prefer. As I said in a previous post, I dispute somewhat that there’s a Jewish cabal who are running things their way – Zuckerberg is most likely as clueless as the next guy – but leaving that aside.

Let’s put it like this: egalitarians are willy-nilly led up the garden-path of the techno-media labyrinth. Within the egalitarian maze there is no description – it’s a techno-verse. This social-area is “technically” true (fact), since anything is true if it’s there, or if it’s an invention like the wings of Icarus. But this truth can still crush reality – if you care anything about the roots of human culture.

This applies to European as much as to Andean tradition (or to the bio-verse of equatorial forests). What you can therefore say is all outsider-groups – not solely European – are descriptions of reality. We could get together. Everything else is an invention, made absolutely manifest in high-tech silicon-valley wares.

The mainstream, by denying instinct and psyche, has by so doing enabled themselves to become as one with a maze which is literally incapable of description, being little more than a technicality (even David Cameron is hard to put into words, for that matter). Perhaps this serves to put “Savage Future” in some sort of context? It’s not necessarily that social-media & cyberspace are inherently negative, but that the mainstream, in order to take full advantage of such advances, puts itself at the mercy of market forces (LME). Anything with so much economic clout has to be good, even if it crushes human instinct and psyche in the process.

We could thereby identify ourselves with traditional people who are just as capable of description – as with the Miwok/Pomo CalifornianIndian basket-weaver – as are Europeans. What may be called for is some sort of ontological schism, as hinted in a comment here on Heidegger.

Heidegger countenanced “Protection (reticence, withdrawal) against contamination by ... the non-essential technological aspects of technics.” This stems from his extension of making (techne) to a wider meaning. Any action which is an art-ificial fabrication of nature (physis) brings-forth into being (poesy) a product of Man’s reason (epistome).

Cutting-through such abstraction isn’t for the timid. My own feeling is that it’s a roundabout way of saying reality (the cosmos) isn’t technical. Unless you explicitly recognize the fact, technique has a type of illusory quality. By linking Greek words, Heidegger makes us realize all products have the same roots. By cutting-off our roots, modern products encircle us with a false sense of security, which you might term illusory.

There’s a type of reality to the Mad Max scenario because supplies are limited and one is always up against the tension of living, as opposed to just driving from A to ZZZ. As well as a distancing from technology, the products of Man’s reason, there are alternatives. Traditional crafts, such as the Pomo ones cited, display a powerful imprint of nature and tactility. Craft has less to do with reason, more to do with feel. If you go into a music-studio you’re confronted by digital mixing desks, inputs and outputs. Without the knowledge of craft it’s just flashing lights.

My own forte has to be pop-culture (which I’m touching on in PART 2), so let’s take the case of Chaplin’s Modern Times which someone cited awhile back as “pertinent”. I guess so, but Oldsmobiles have a lot more craft, I mean in the surface design of a car. The elegant décor shields you from the 100 horsepower hidden within. Modern cars are much more functional and “online”, so maybe there’s less distancing? 

This is something I want to explore in some detail in PART 2. The distance we have from tech is sort of precarious - The illo of Slocum in google glasses has flipped, and is cyborg. An alternative to Daedalus-geeks could be a more tactile, craft-oriented future.

Tags:



Comments:


1

Posted by Guessedworker on Wed, 19 Mar 2014 18:07 | #

The image of Ophelia, who climbed into a willow tree, and fell to her death in the brook below when a branch broke:


2

Posted by neil vodavzny on Fri, 21 Mar 2014 10:04 | #

http://monyeux.wordpress.com/2011/11/28/essay-ophelia-from-page-to-paint/

This essay on pre-Raphaelite narrative is pretty interesting.
Cabanel was a “salon” painter, what you might call fuddy-duddy compared to the more spirit-minded pre-Raphaelites.
If you compare the BWS Ophelia with the Holman Hunts (below), they are tableau-esque, almost sculptural. That’s a very neat technique for narrative, where the scene is caught in its spiritual essence.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/William_Holman_Hunt


3

Posted by Desmond Jones on Fri, 21 Mar 2014 22:51 | #

“Lizzie” Sidall apparently was the model “for Millais’, (one of the founders of the Pre-Raphaelite Brotherhood) Ophelia in 1852. Siddal floated in a bathtub full of water to represent the drowning Ophelia”.  Sidall eventually married Rossetti, meeting an untimely end from an overdose of laudanum. 

Overcome with grief, Rossetti enclosed in his wife’s coffin a journal containing the only copy he had of his many poems. He supposedly slid the book into Siddal’s red hair. She was interred at Highgate Cemetery in London. By 1869, Rossetti was chronically addicted to drugs and alcohol. He had convinced himself he was going blind and couldn’t paint. He began to write poetry. Before publishing his newer poems he became obsessed with retrieving the poems he had slipped into his wife’s coffin. Rossetti and his agent, Charles Augustus Howell, applied to the Home Secretary for an order to have her coffin exhumed. It was done in the dead of night to avoid public curiosity and attention, and Rossetti was not present. Howell reported that her corpse was remarkably well preserved and her delicate beauty intact, probably as a result of the laudanum. Her hair was said to have continued to grow after death so that the coffin was filled with her flowing coppery hair.

Arthur Conan Doyle modeled his Holmesian antagonist Charles Augustus Milverton upon the allegedly infamous blackmailer Howell. The BBC’s recent Sherlockian incarnation Benedict Cumberbatch does battle with nemesis Charles Augustus Magnusson, who holds the secrets of those he threatens to blackmail in his mind palace.

Thanks for that trip, Neil.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Elizabeth_Siddal



Post a comment:


Name: (required)

Email: (required but not displayed)

URL: (optional)

Note: You should copy your comment to the clipboard or paste it somewhere before submitting it, so that it will not be lost if the session times out.

Remember me


Next entry: Belles Lettres
Previous entry: To Wyoming, an American journey

image of the day

Existential Issues

DNA Nations

Categories

Contributors

Each author's name links to a list of all articles posted by the writer.

Links

Endorsement not implied.

Immigration

Islamist Threat

Anti-white Media Networks

Audio/Video

Crime

Economics

Education

General

Historical Re-Evaluation

Controlled Opposition

Nationalist Political Parties

Science

Europeans in Africa

Of Note

Comments

Al Ross commented in entry 'Out of foundation and into the mind-body problem, part four' on Tue, 19 Mar 2024 06:26. (View)

Al Ross commented in entry 'Out of foundation and into the mind-body problem, part four' on Tue, 19 Mar 2024 06:09. (View)

Al Ross commented in entry 'Out of foundation and into the mind-body problem, part four' on Tue, 19 Mar 2024 05:41. (View)

Al Ross commented in entry 'Out of foundation and into the mind-body problem, part four' on Tue, 19 Mar 2024 05:24. (View)

James Bowery commented in entry 'Out of foundation and into the mind-body problem, part four' on Tue, 19 Mar 2024 02:16. (View)

Thorn commented in entry 'On Spengler and the inevitable' on Mon, 18 Mar 2024 23:20. (View)

Guessedworker commented in entry 'On Spengler and the inevitable' on Mon, 18 Mar 2024 00:31. (View)

Thorn commented in entry 'On Spengler and the inevitable' on Sun, 17 Mar 2024 23:58. (View)

Thorn commented in entry 'A Russian Passion' on Sun, 17 Mar 2024 23:12. (View)

Thorn commented in entry 'Out of foundation and into the mind-body problem, part four' on Sun, 17 Mar 2024 13:01. (View)

Thorn commented in entry 'Out of foundation and into the mind-body problem, part four' on Sun, 17 Mar 2024 12:27. (View)

Al Ross commented in entry 'Out of foundation and into the mind-body problem, part four' on Sun, 17 Mar 2024 08:34. (View)

Al Ross commented in entry 'Patriotic Alternative given the black spot' on Sun, 17 Mar 2024 08:11. (View)

Al Ross commented in entry 'Patriotic Alternative given the black spot' on Sun, 17 Mar 2024 07:20. (View)

Manc commented in entry 'Patriotic Alternative given the black spot' on Sat, 16 Mar 2024 22:29. (View)

Thorn commented in entry 'Patriotic Alternative given the black spot' on Sat, 16 Mar 2024 19:15. (View)

Guessedworker commented in entry 'Patriotic Alternative given the black spot' on Sat, 16 Mar 2024 19:03. (View)

Manc commented in entry 'Patriotic Alternative given the black spot' on Sat, 16 Mar 2024 18:15. (View)

Guessedworker commented in entry 'Patriotic Alternative given the black spot' on Sat, 16 Mar 2024 17:31. (View)

Thorn commented in entry 'Patriotic Alternative given the black spot' on Sat, 16 Mar 2024 12:46. (View)

Thorn commented in entry 'Patriotic Alternative given the black spot' on Sat, 16 Mar 2024 12:27. (View)

Al Ross commented in entry 'Patriotic Alternative given the black spot' on Sat, 16 Mar 2024 07:14. (View)

Al Ross commented in entry 'Patriotic Alternative given the black spot' on Sat, 16 Mar 2024 05:38. (View)

Al Ross commented in entry 'Patriotic Alternative given the black spot' on Sat, 16 Mar 2024 04:54. (View)

Al Ross commented in entry 'Out of foundation and into the mind-body problem, part four' on Sat, 16 Mar 2024 03:51. (View)

Al Ross commented in entry 'Patriotic Alternative given the black spot' on Sat, 16 Mar 2024 03:47. (View)

Al Ross commented in entry 'Patriotic Alternative given the black spot' on Sat, 16 Mar 2024 03:44. (View)

Al Ross commented in entry 'Patriotic Alternative given the black spot' on Sat, 16 Mar 2024 03:39. (View)

Al Ross commented in entry 'What lies at the core' on Sat, 16 Mar 2024 03:28. (View)

Al Ross commented in entry 'Out of foundation and into the mind-body problem, part four' on Sat, 16 Mar 2024 03:19. (View)

Guessedworker commented in entry 'Patriotic Alternative given the black spot' on Fri, 15 Mar 2024 23:34. (View)

Guessedworker commented in entry 'Patriotic Alternative given the black spot' on Fri, 15 Mar 2024 23:32. (View)

Thorn commented in entry 'Patriotic Alternative given the black spot' on Fri, 15 Mar 2024 22:53. (View)

Thorn commented in entry 'Out of foundation and into the mind-body problem, part four' on Wed, 13 Mar 2024 23:04. (View)

James Bowery commented in entry 'Out of foundation and into the mind-body problem, part four' on Wed, 13 Mar 2024 12:35. (View)

affection-tone