The same institution that publishes this ominous graph, the same institution which defines the various means of genocide, including displacement of habitat and interbreeding, now brings ratification of immigration as a “human right”.

Voice of Europe, “Nine EU members steer clear of the UN Global Compact for Migration”, 19 Dec 2019:

The UN General Assembly formally ratified the UN deal on migration on Wednesday 19 December. Of the EU members, three voted against, five abstained and one didn’t vote. The United States and several other countries also did not support it.

It was ratified with the support of 152 countries in favour, five nations – the United States, Hungary, the Czech Republic, Poland and Israel voted against it. There was a total of twelve who abstained, Austria, Bulgaria, Italy, Latvia and Romania and Slovakia did not vote.

Citizens of many of the countries responded with petitions demanding their leaders NOT sign this disastrous treaty. This would appear to be a treaty made by the elected leaders against the wishes of those by whom they were elected.

There were more than 50 delegations who gave explanations of their decisions.

Hungary’s Minister for Foreign Affairs and Trade, Péter Szijjártó, asserted that the General Assembly was making a serious mistake ratifying “this unbalanced, biased and pro-migration document” stating that migration is “a dangerous phenomenon”. Mr. Szijjártó stressed that Hungary reserves the sovereign right to decide for themselves on migration and security measures.

To say the Migration Pact has been a divisive topic is possibly an understatement.

Belgium voted in favour of the treaty despite the Prime Minister Charles Michel being forced to resign last Tuesday as he lost his majority when coalition partner N-VA walked out over their being against the Migration Pact.

Whilst in Slovakia the foreign minister Miroslav Lajčák also resigned in November due to their parliament voting against the signing of the pact. The former foreign minister had helped write the initiative as president of the United Nations General Assembly in 2017.

The United States is said to have been attempting to convince other countries to vote against it right up to the last minute.

Euractiv, “Nine EU members stay away from UN migration pact”, 19 Dec 2018:
 
Three EU members voted against, five abstained and one didn’t vote during the formal ratification on Wednesday (19 December) in New York of the Global Compact on Migration.

The UN General Assembly on Wednesday formally ratified a UN deal on migration by a large majority — but without the support of the United States and a string of other countries.

A total of 152 countries voted in favor of the Global Compact for Safe, Orderly and Regular Migration, which was agreed upon earlier this month by 165 UN members at a meeting in Morocco.

Marrakesh UN forum adopts migration pact despite withdrawals

A United Nations conference adopted a migration pact in front of leaders and representatives from over 160 countries in Morocco on Monday (10 December), despite a string of withdrawals, including several EU countries, driven by anti-immigrant populism.

Five nations voted against it — the United States, Hungary, the Czech Republic, Poland and Israel.

Among the twelve abstaining countries are EU members Austria, Bulgaria, Italy, Latvia and Romania. Slovakia did not vote.

More than 50 delegations explained their positions.

Péter Szijjártó, Hungary’s Minister for Foreign Affairs and Trade, said that the General Assembly was about to commit a serious mistake by endorsing “this unbalanced, biased and pro-migration document”.  Migration is “a dangerous phenomenon,” he said, emphasizing that Hungary reserves the sovereign right to decide on migration and security measures.

The representative of Bulgaria said his delegation joined several European nations, including Italy and Switzerland, in abstaining from today’s vote.  The proposed visa liberalization measures might lead to lesser control over migrants in general and the term “newly arrived migrants” may leave room for various interpretations, he said, noting that Bulgaria is not in a position to adhere fully to certain commitments and concrete actions associated with them.

According to diplomats, the United States had sought to the last minute to convince other countries not to support the pact.

Belgium voted in favour, although its Prime Minister Charles Michel announced it resignation on Tuesday, having lost majority after its anti-immigration coalition partner N-VA abandoned ship.

Belgian PM announces resignation in crisis started by migrant row.

Belgium Prime Minister Charles Michel offered to resign on Tuesday (18 December) after opponents tabled a no confidence vote in a political crisis triggered by differences over immigration.

In Slovakia, the foreign minister Miroslav Lajčák resigned last November, after the country’s parliament voted against signing-up to the Global Compact. Lajčák had helped to put together the initiative as president of the United Nations General Assembly in 2017.

Slovak foreign minister’s resignation over Migration Pact puzzles political scene.

Slovak President Andrej Kiska is taking “time to think” about Foreign Affairs Minister Lajčák’s resignation. The long-serving pro-European career diplomat, Lajčák said he was stepping down after the Parliament’s refusal of the UN migration compact last week. EURACTIV Slovakia reports.

Billed as the first international document on managing migration, the Global Compact lays out 23 objectives to open up legal migration and discourage illegal border crossings, as the number of people on the move globally has surged to more than almost 260 million, or 3.4% of the world’ population.

More than 80% of those moving between countries do so legally, but more 60,000 people have died trying to cross border illicitly since 2000, according to UN figures.

The agreement is not legally binding, which has raised concerns among NGOs and human rights advocates that its provisions may not be fully implemented.

Hungary once again denounced the pact as a “serious mistake” and raised the spectre of a fresh influx of migrants, while Brazil’s far-right president-elect Jair Bolsonaro said migrants had made parts of France “unlivable” and announced he would withdraw from the pact.

Support ‘safe’ migration

But UN Secretary-General Antonio Guterres warned at the summit last week in Morocco for world leaders to sign off on the text that “we must not succumb to fear and false narratives.”

German Chancellor Angela Merkel also sought to quell fears at the meeting, saying the aim of the agreement was to prevent, rather than encourage, illegal migration.

“This is about safe, orderly and regular migration — it says (this) clearly in the title,” she said in Marrakesh.

The pact includes a series of principles — including the defence of human rights, recognition of the sovereignty of nations — as well as a list of collaborative tools, such as sharing information and expertise and integrating migrants.

It stipulates that the detention of migrants should only be a last resort in tackling the global problem.

Amnesty International, a human rights group that supported the pact, said the countries that refused to endorse it — including the United States, Australia, Hungary, Italy, Poland and Austria — had been responsible for the “worst abuses against migrants in recent years.”

Johan Stavers comments:

20/12/2018 at 08:24

We need to tear this Markakesh pact to pieces along with those ‘human rights’.

There is not ‘human right’ to break into countries and be provided with shelter and food paid for by the natives. There is no ‘human right’ to be given lands and money of other people.

The ‘false narrative’ is that this is the case.

The ‘fear’ is obviously of not being like by everybody.

and the “worst abuses against migrants in recent years.” have been committed by Amnesty International and other NGO’s who compel people to die on a dangerous trip because they got told they will be welcome at the other side of the ocean.