Posted by Kosher connections to England on Sat, 18 Apr 2015 18:36 | #

Kosher connections in England

Was Ed Miliband’s father a KGB stooge? By Francis Carr Begbie

The lack-lustre British general election campaign has been spiced up somewhat with the news of a link between a party leader and one of the greatest murderers of the twentieth century Genrikh Yagoda.

According to the Daily Mail, the Liberal Democrat party leader Nick Clegg —  who was the Deputy Prime Minister — had an aunt in twenties Moscow who was a Mata Hari-type spy who spread her favours far and wide in the cause of whoever was paying her; entrapping and compromising various paramours including British diplomats and Soviet big wigs.

The Mail alleges that Baroness Moura Budberg worked for the genocidal Jewish Bolshevik Yagoda and may have been one of his sexual conquests. Yagoda was the director of the NKVD during its most bloodthirsty period in the thirties when many millions of ethnic Russians, Ukrainians, Georgians and many others were liquidated at his hands.

Jewish ethnicity may have been one of the factors that Clegg’s aunt and Yagoda had in common as Jews who were a tiny fraction of the Russian population, predominated at the top end of Bolshevik society.  They were particularly thick on the ground in the ruthless security apparatus and there has been continued speculation that their genocidal ruthlessness was fuelled by ethnic hatred of Whites.

Thanks to the Toronto Globe and Mail we now know that Nick Clegg is a cousin of the Canadian Liberal Party leader — and ethnic Jew —  Michael Ignatieff. The Huffington Post has described Clegg’s family background as “shrouded in mystery” although it is heavily Dutch and Russian aristocratic.

This would mean that this is the first British general election where all three candidates for the prime minister’s post have varying strong degrees of Jewish antecedence. The incumbent prime minister David Cameron has already boasted of his strong Jewish roots to no less than the Knesset.

But in many ways it is the Jewish roots of Cameron’s closest rival Ed Miliband which are most intriguing. Unlike the other two, Miliband is fully ethnically Jewish and boasts an impressive family pedigree with roots that go deep into Britain’s Marxist world.

....full article at TOO

Posted by NY Times Wails on Wed, 29 Apr 2015 03:57 | #

New York Times Wails About Racism in Comments:

http://www.amren.com/news/2015/04/new-york-times-wails-about-racism/

In the March 28 New York Times, black columnist Brent Staples lovingly described a recent DOJ Office of Civil Rights study that claims young black students routinely get more severe discipline than white students for exactly the same offense. Mr. Staples concludes with his usual self-righteous wailing: “Racism, after all, is in the very air that we breathe as Americans. It filters the way many of us see the world (whether we know it or not) and shapes decisions of all kinds.”

Some reader/commenters joined in the hand-wringing, but many heaped scorn on the DOJ “study.” It’s also worth noting that comments at the New York Times are moderated, so if there were comments about racial differences in IQ and time preference they were probably rejected.

TL, Dallas:

  This is ridiculous! I am a teacher and I can say that I have witnessed the exact opposite occur. While working in my old district, I would regularly receive emails from administration asking us to not send any more minorities to the office until we had more white kids. Any white student out of dress code was immediately sent to ISS (in school suspension) for the day in order to make it okay to send a Hispanic or African-American student for worse offenses (fighting, stealing, using profanity in class) to ISS. Race has become a cop-out. . . . This article says that it’s better to be white because whites are given more opportunities and aren’t punished as much but that is NOT true! I have been told to exclude white children from special tutorial sessions because, “they’re white, they’ll get by.” We had to give scholarship awards to African-American and Hispanic students for being “C” average students. I will NOT listen to ignorant people that have never been in the classroom or school discuss how unfair the education system is to minorities! On a similar note, I was told by a friend whom worked in the office of a school I had applied for a teaching job that I couldn’t get an interview because I was “the wrong color.” The district told the principal that he needed more minorities. Racism is still prevalent but the victims aren’t the same. It’s “taboo” to discuss racism against whites . . . .

Ed, Maryland:

  I’m Black and went to a diverse school adjacent to DC. Most of the fights, class disruptions and just overall cruelty was committed by Blacks. I don’t care what DOJ investigation says about some random school district, I know what I experienced. I know what my family and friends experienced as well and it is not pretty.

JohnB, Staten Island:

  My mother is a retired high school teacher, and to this day she will tell you how the black students in her school (who were about a 10 percent minority) were able to get away with behavior that would never have been tolerated in the whites, because if they had been held to the same standard as whites too many of them would have been suspended, and the school would have been accused of racism. I went to that same high school, and I saw for myself that, while there were certainly exceptions, the black students overall were far more rowdy and disruptive than the white students.

  This is my own personal experience, and if contradicts what government Civil Rights investigations say then so be it. Maybe the behavior of black students has varied at different times and in different parts of the country. Or maybe Civil Rights investigations are politicized somehow–difficult as that may be to imagine!

  But there really is something strange going on here. School teachers and administrators tend to be very liberal, and areas with a lot of black students also often have a lot of black school officials. I find it very hard to believe that these people–consciously or unconsciously–are punishing students just for being black! There is something else going on here, something that perhaps contradicts the official narrative of unending oppression of blacks by whites. Whatever it is, we are not likely to read about it in the Times.

Ian Maitland, Minneapolis:

  What I would like to hear from Brent Staples (and the Department of Justice), but I haven’t yet, is the recognition that racial disparities in punishment are justified if they reflect racial disparities in behavior. In that case, “racial disparities” are perfectly consistent with treating violations of school rules the same, regardless of race or ethnicity.

  As has been pointed out, there is an enormous “disparity” between boys and girls when it comes to discipline, but no one claims that boys have been discriminated against.

WorldCitizen, Vallejo:

  I’ve been a public middle school teacher in a mid-size California city for about five years. I try very hard to create a positive learning environment. And I really try to appreciate my students, often urging myself to look for their strengths and special gifts that I might miss because we have different backgrounds. ALL students have great things to share, if we pay attention.

  That said, I have found in my first five years that different groups of students tend to present different opportunities and challenges in the classroom. Yesterday a black girl sat down and said loudly, “I hate white people.” She described being “surrounded” by white people in a cafe and how they talked in a style she found “stupid.” AA students also use the N word a lot, along with the F word. White students where I teach tend to keep that language to themselves more of the time. Why? I’m sure it’s complicated. Also, AA students where I teach get physically violent or just disrupt class by yelling and moving around much more often than whites. . . .

  Can’t we really celebrate our differences, and stop pretending our communities are all exactly the same?

William Case, Texas:

  Anyone who has walked the hallways of both predominantly white suburban schools and predominantly black inner city schools knows there is distinct difference in student behavior. Discipline is more difficult to maintain in inner-city schools.

NG, NYC:

  It is important to note that the behavior of the student is not the only factor that is considered when determining consequences for violent or disruptive behavior. I teach in an inner-city environment where parents often ignore teachers (many screen out calls from the school or fail to respond to notes and letters from teachers or administrators), fail to show up at conferences or disciplinary hearings, and curse at and threaten teachers when confronted with their child’s inappropriate behavior. When parents are cooperative in working with school staff to correct a problem, the students are far less likely to be suspended. Might there be some disparities in this area that account for the differences in consequences?

Ralph, Illinois:

  Everything’s always the white man’s fault if you never take personal responsibility for your own failures and direct instead the blame fully on outside forces, then you will never improve, or overcome–let me guess, the solution will be to mete out punishment to blacks on a percentage basis equally.

Deborah T.:

  Spend some time at an actual school and watch staff and administrators bending over backwards to try and not suspend/discipline African American students.

Michael H.,  Alameda, California:

  The assumption seems to be that administrators and teachers are at the very least biased against minorities, if not a bunch of racists. That they are primarily white and just don’t like minorities.

  The problem with that mindset is that the suspension rate for Asian students is consistently half that of whites. Asian are about 16% of the population in California, and their suspension rates are consistently way, way lower than whites. And the reason for that is behavior. Students are suspended based on their behavior.

Chris, Toms River, NJ:

  This is nonsense. Boys are suspended at 4 times the rate of girls, yet no one calls teachers (predominantly women BTW) sexist bigots. Whites are suspended at twice the rate of Asians; is the school system biased against whites and boys? Is there any evidence that schools are racist against black boys in favor of Asian girls? After all, teachers are indoctrinated in college with systematic anti-male, anti-white critical race theory and white privilege. Many, if not most, of the administrators engaged in these suspensions of black children are also black. Could it be that with shocking levels of single parenthood and violent crime, there are lower rates of impulse control and higher rates of violence among black youths? Illegitimacy rates are three times higher among blacks than whites, and the rate of violence among black youths is 8 times higher (its 16 times that of Asians). One of my fellow teachers was attacked by a Kindergartner who called her cracker, white bitch and a host of racial epithets; he was suspended only after attacking her with a pencil and attempted to stab her. She was then told by administrators that if she could not deal with the situation, she should not be teaching in such a district (translation: here’s the door, cracker).

Posted by NeoCon 5th column on Mon, 04 May 2015 15:41 | #

The Neoconservative Serpent: The Enemy Within the Gates

May 2, 2015

This is a world in which America dominates the world and the Jews dominate America.

An edited abridgement based on this article by Nelson Hultberg, with many clarificatory comments inserted into the text by Lasha Darkmoon.

The term “Fifth Column” came into popular use in the Spanish Civil War in the 1930s. It means a group of guerrillas, activists, and intellectuals who work to undermine a nation from within. Its activities can be out in the open, or they can be secret.

Today, in America, the neoconservative political movement represents a “Fifth Column” for the forces of collectivism or neo-Communism.

Its intellectuals and activists promote themselves as conservatives who oppose the liberals, but their political philosophy has nothing to do with true American conservatism, which has always stood for a limited constitutional government and free enterprise. These traditional American values are anathema to today’s neoconservatives.

The neoconservatives, as we all know, are either overwhelmingly Jewish or shabbos goyim: non-Jewish camp followers of international Jewry who are on the Jewish payroll. They all have one thing in common: a fanatical allegiance to the state of Israel and to the neoliberal values of the Frankfurt School, itself a predominantly Jewish movement that took root in Germany in the 1920s and was then exported wholesale to America.

  The values these neo-Marxists espouse, often disguised and prettified to make them more palatable to the public, are godlessness, a culture of pessimism, despair creation, hatred of Christianity, sexual licence masquerading as “sexual liberation”, the destruction of the family, homosexual propaganda, radical feminism, abortion, the promotion of pornography and sexual deviation, the sexualization of children, and, soon to come, the legalization of pedophilia. 

The late Irving Kristol, editor of The Public Interest, and Norman Podhoretz, editor of Commentary, were the founders of the neoconservative movement in the late 1960s. In their youth during the 1930s and 1940s, they were followers of the communist Leon Trotsky.

Having bought into the Bolshevik Revolution of 1917, they saw socialism as an ideal that needed to be spread to the West. While they and their followers subsequently modified the Marxist roots of their ideology in favor of a more gradualist methodology, they always remained adamant supporters of “collectivism” (i.e. neo-Communism) for America.

Are they outright socialists? No, but their policy proposals have always been in favor of massive government welfarism domestically and an aggressive militaristic foreign policy that seeks what is termed “benevolent global hegemony,” in which the US military is to be used preemptively to spread “freedom and democracy” throughout the world.

  What the neoconservatives want is a centralized mega-state running the world from Washington, with international Jewry calling the shots and doing its utmost to ensure that America, while bossing the world around, remains subservient to Israel and world Jewry. The basic philosophy underlying neoconservatism is essentially this: what is good for the Jews is good for the world.

In Irving Kristol’s eyes, the laissez-faire vision of America’s Founding Fathers was a “doctrinaire fantasy.” Its ideals “make it inadequate for a political community,” he pontificated in 1977.  Yes, Irving Kristol, son of Jewish immigrants to America, knows better than George Washington and Thomas Jefferson what is good for America. The Founding Fathers were fools. Away with their anachronistic views! According to Kristol and his fellow neoconservatives, all such erroneous ideas must be phased out of our collective consciousness.

  And so here is another fundamental premise of neoconservatism: Jews know best what is good for non-Jews. And what is good for non-Jews, as you might expect, is good for Jews also.

Kristol died in 2009, but his worldview dominates all of today’s younger neoconservatives. He believed that capitalism and individual rights are dangerous institutions. They must be constantly modified by a powerful state that redistributes wealth whenever necessary to mold market enterprises into an appropriately egalitarian social structure.

  The redistribution of wealth, however, invariably seems to involve the rich 1 percent getting richer at the expense of the other 99 percent of the population. In addition, the richest ethnic group to profit and become even richer under this new egalitarianism happens to be, by sheer coincidence, the Jews. How strange! We live in an Orwellian world where not only does peace means war and freedom means slavery but where egalitarianism, or making people equal, actually means making people less equal.

In the neoconservative mind, freedom, while desirable, is not a primary political value. Machiavelli had the better idea: expediency is the best way to rule. People need to be manipulatively led by their elites – via open dialogue and democracy if possible, but by deception, coercion and expediency when necessary.

The neoconservatives represent tyranny’s Fifth Column in America. They are deceiving the people into believing that they are genuine conservatives, but like the socialists who were their mentors, they call themselves what they know the people want to hear. These bogus conservatives have now grown to dominate Washington’s think tanks, Wall Street’s brokerages and banks, and many major publications and universities. They are highly influential writers, scholars, pundits, publishers, institute heads, bankers and corporate moguls.

The Enemies Within the Gates

Let’s now mention eight of the more influential neoconservatives in America, past and present. These are not friends of freedom, but enemies. They need to be recognized for who they are, traitors to what America was meant to be. They need to be exposed and attacked as we would attack serpents that are slithering into our back yards to threaten our safety and our families.

Irving Kristol ( Jew) is considered to be the “godfather of neoconservatism.” A powerful liberal writer during the 1950s and 1960s, he had grown disenchanted with the Democratic Party by 1970 and switched to the Republican Party, coining the name “neoconservative” for the band of intellectuals he brought with him. Immensely persuasive in the shaping of the movement.

Norman Podhoretz (Jew) is one of the major founders with Irving Kristol of neoconservatism in the late 1960s. He served as Editor-in-Chief of Commentary magazine from 1960 to 1995, pouring out a myriad of articles and books on the need to build America into an all-pervasive “collectivist state.”

Richard Perle (Jew) is called the “Prince of Darkness” because of his extreme hawkish military stands. He is a member of the Reagan Pentagon, now serves in Washington think tanks such as the Hudson Institute and the American Enterprise Institute. Vehemently promoted the invasion of Iraq, and to this day favors extensive intervention in the Middle East to bring about regime changes.

Paul Wolfowitz (Jew) is the most hawkish advocate in the Bush administration and the architect of the Bush Doctrine. A visiting fellow at the American Enterprise Institute, he is a former World Bank chief and Pentagon official who was closely involved in the decision to invade Iraq in 2003. He has been back and forth between academia and government for the entirety of his career.

William Kristol (Jew) is the son of Irving Kristol and editor of the prestigious Weekly Standard. He was the cofounder of PNAC (Project for the New American Century) with Robert Kagan. He is a widely recognized pundit and influential Washington political operative. Director at the Foreign Policy Initiative and member of numerous think tanks in Washington as well as a Fox News regular.

Robert Kagan (Jew) is co-founder with Bill Kristol of the Project for the New American Century, Kagan is a policy pundit and historian based at the Brookings Institution. He serves also as a contributing editor at The New Republic and, thus, personifies the collectivist liberalism that infuses neoconservatism. They are statist ideological brothers.

Frank Gaffney (Jew) is the director of the hawkish neoconservative Center for Security Policy. He has been a longtime advocate of interventionist U.S. foreign policies, ever-increasing military budgets and aggressive attacks upon the Islamic world. A regular on Fox News.

Charles Krauthammer (Jew) is a writer for The Washington Post. He is considered to be the most influential neoconservative political columnist in America. He is also a Pulitzer Prize winner, Fox News talking head, and was a weekly panelist on the PBS show “Inside Washington” from 1990 to 2013.

There are, of course, many other prominent neoconservatives than just these eight — all of them either Jewish or fanatically devoted to Zionist interests, apparently quite happy to see America become an Israeli colony.

Hundreds of others like Bill Bennett, Elliott Abrams, Joshua Muravchik, James Woolsey, John Bolton, Max Boot, Karl Rove, David Frum and Condoleezza Rice are all assiduously working to advance One World Government throughout the world.

  This is a world in which America dominates the world and the Jews dominate America. Nothing could be simpler than this, and only a fool can fail to perceive it: this is Jewish world domination by the back door.

  No need to mention the Protocols of the Elders of Zion. Forget the Protocols! This is a new way of achieving old ends. First get control of America, and then make America the indisputable superpower.

  This is how a group comprising 0.2 percent of the world’s population can achieve world domination, reducing the rest of mankind to the condition of slaves and vassals.

Posted by patriot act shut down on Sun, 17 May 2015 19:17 | #

Patriot Act shut down..

NSA reform: Bush-era powers expire as US prepares to roll back surveillance

Sweeping intelligence capabilities exposed by Edward Snowden shut down as hawks concede defeat on first major surveillance reform in a generation

http://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2015/may/31/nsa-reform-senate-deal-as-patriot-act

Sweeping US surveillance powers, enjoyed by the National Security Agency since the aftermath of the 2001 terrorist attacks, shut down at midnight after a dramatic Senate showdown in which even the NSA’s biggest supporters conceded that substantial reforms were inevitable.
Fears NSA will seek to undermine surveillance reform
Read more

Almost two years after the whistleblower Edward Snowden revealed to the Guardian that the Patriot Act was secretly being used to justify the collection of phone records from millions of Americans, critics of bulk surveillance went further than expected and forced the end of a range of other legal authorities covered by the Bush-era Patriot Act as well.

The expired provisions, subject to a “sunset” clause from the beginning of June onwards, are likely to be replaced later this week with new legislation – the USA Freedom Act – that permanently bans the NSA from collecting telephone records in bulk and introduces new transparency rules for other surveillance activities. The USA Freedom Act, once passed, will be the first rollback of NSA surveillance since the seminal 1978 Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act.
Advertisement

But until then, in addition to the expiration of the NSA’s phone records collection, the FBI is prevented from using powers granted under the Patriot Act, including the pursuit of so-called “business records” relating to internet use, hotel and rental car records and credit card statements.

Both developments represent a remarkable capitulation for the Republican Senate majority leader, Mitch McConnell, who had initially sought to simply extend the Patriot Act provisions, despite overwhelming support in the House of Representatives for the USA Freedom Act.

McConnell and his colleagues who opposed reform were thwarted in their efforts by a growing backlash by Senate Republicans and, in particular, his Kentucky colleague, Senator Rand Paul.

“This is the only realistic way forward,” acknowledged the Republican leader during a rare Sunday evening session just hours before the Patriot Act was set to expire. Shortly after, the Senate voted 77 to 17 to proceed to debate on the USA Freedom Act – a procedural hurdle that fell three votes short during another special session focused on surveillance reform nine days earlier.

The development was welcomed by the White House, which has also come to support the USA Freedom Act after Barack Obama proposed that the NSA could seek specific records directly from telephone companies instead.

“The Senate took an important – if late – step forward tonight,” White House press secretary, Josh Earnest, said. “We call on the Senate to ensure this irresponsible lapse in authorities is as short-lived as possible.”

Even Paul, after the procedural vote, conceded that the bill will now ultimately pass, although he appeared determined to drag it out as a long as possible. “Tonight begins the process of ending bulk collection,” he said.

Paul, who is running for president on a libertarian-leaning agenda, believes the USA Freedom Act does not go far enough in tackling the surveillance abuses revealed by Snowden.

Posted by Jews seeking to reclaim Khazaria on Sun, 24 May 2015 15:22 | #

Corresponding with the theory that GW favors, Lasha Darkmoon sees a motive to reclaim Khazaria for Jews behind this Ukrainian/Russian conflict

http://arabnyheter.info/sv/2014/06/01/ukraine-zionist-americas-new-jewish-colony-by-lasha-darkmoon/

http://www.darkmoon.me/2014/ukraine-zionist-americas-new-jewish-colony-by-lasha-darkmoon/

http://eurofolkradio.com/2014/08/08/new-dna-research-confirms-jews-not-descendants-of-abraham/

Posted by Michael Collins Piper dies on Thu, 04 Jun 2015 22:43 | #

                    Michael Collins Piper

Died June 1, 2015:

Michael Collins Piper’s body was discovered on June 1, 2015 in a Coeur d’Alene, ID motel. According to police, his death was considered due from natural causes, possibly due to an existing heart condition. He was 54.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Michael_Collins_Piper

Brief Biography:

Michael Collins Piper (July 16, 1960 – June 1, 2015) was a political writer, conspiracy theorist,[1] and talk radio host living in Washington D.C.. He was a regular contributor to the American Free Press, a newspaper backed by Willis Carto noted for its antisemitism, White separatist and White nationalist themes. Piper’s books and articles have also been featured by a wide-ranging and eclectic variety of websites, including PressTV, Vanguard News Network, and the website of Holocaust denier David Duke.

Early life:

Piper was born and baptized Michael Bernard Piper. Although one side of his family are devoutly Roman Catholic, he claims he was raised without religion.[4] He says his political engagement was inspired by his older brother’s experience in the Vietnam War. He once claimed his late brother “never completely recovered from the physical and psychological impact of the war.”[2]

Kennedy and King assassination theories:

According to Piper in Final Judgment: The Missing Link in the JFK Assassination Controversy, Israeli Prime Minister David Ben-Gurion orchestrated the assassination after learning that Kennedy planned to keep Israel from obtaining nuclear weapons.[7] Piper said that the assassination “was a joint enterprise conducted on the highest levels of the CIA, in collaboration with organized crime — and most specifically, with direct and profound involvement by the Israeli intelligence service, the Mossad.”[8] Piper sought to tie in other John F. Kennedy assassination conspiracy theories, primarily involving claims that Jewish mobster Meyer Lansky’s organized the hit, and that future president Lyndon B. Johnson staged the event from inside the administration

9-11:
Piper posited that the accepted narrative of the September 11 attacks, as reported in the U.S. media, is untrue,[13] although those who suffered and died in the tragedies deserve honor.[12] He said the collapse of the World Trade Center towers was part of a planned controlled demolition.[13] Further, Piper claimed Mossad knew of the impending attacks and allowed them to happen.