Posted by ben tillman on Tue, 08 Mar 2005 22:04 | #

The BNP is right, of course.  And for someone who grew up near the Chattooga River, this hits close to home.

Posted by john rackell on Tue, 08 Mar 2005 22:54 | #

Even the most politically apathetic White Briton might get a clue when the word gets around he is being openly jeered at.

The producers must have had a few chuckles over how smart they were. How to represent the native Brits as anti-diluvian racist morons without actually overlaying a caption to that effect. Nothing like snickering behind their backs to see if the morons get the joke played on them.

The multicultists may be too smart for their own good.

But dueling banjos is a beautiful piece of music and doesn’t have any negative associations for me. In fact the kid in the movie played it with a lot of spirit and won his own dignity by doing so.

“Deliverance” could stand as an allegory for the failed multicultist experiment. A viable, working community being uprooted for the sake of “improvement”(the dam) foisted on them by do-gooders. With most people meekly accepting it while seeing their entire history be submerged: they even dug up the coffins from the graveyard for resettlement. Unfortunately, the destruction of community unleashed savage forces that did in the hapless canoeists.

Posted by Lurker on Wed, 09 Mar 2005 03:30 | #

I think the presenter was this person:

http://www.kenanmalik.com

Once a member of the Revolutionary Communist Party, a fact which he neglects to mention on his site (wonder why?) He seems to espouse a benign humanist belief about open borders. Since there is zero real-world evidence for this being workable immigration policy (for the host nation) now or at any time in history and he doesnt seem to be stupid, he must therefore intend it maliciously. We can assume then that he is still a member of the RCP or something similar.

Posted by John S Bolton on Wed, 09 Mar 2005 10:16 | #

Today’s left has only one desire; to get subhuman savagery into civilization and destroy it. As recently as the 1960’s many on the left pretended to be for reason, science and moral progress.  Those lines of propaganda have been long since abandoned, though. Today the left will cynically assert the moral superiority of tropical pestholes and the populations which make them what they are. As if failure could be success, and is if it were not gross subversion of morality to pretend that it could be. This newer left picks its initiatives on the basis of whether its opponents can be described as racists or fascists, since ad hominem approaches are still available to those who have no rational arguments available, that they can use. The right must anticipate this, and be first to call attention to tendencies towards nass murder on the left. The Khmer Rouge and other leftist egalitarian regimes, have shown that socialism is mass murder as an end in itself.

Posted by Pericles on Wed, 09 Mar 2005 10:21 | #

Dear John Rackell,

Billy Redden

This image is iconic in as much as it is rooted in American folklore, it triggers fears of loss and hopelessness in people. Billy Redden was not actually acting, he was the real thing and was not sufficiently expert in faking the playing of the infamous music sequence, convincingly enough; ultimately another youngster was hidden behind his chair, with the task of providing the hand movements on the guitar.

Billy Redden is still alive and has made a second film with Tim Burton.  Big Fish

Music here http://www.thesahara.net/deliverance.htm

Regards,

Pericles

Posted by John S Bolton on Wed, 09 Mar 2005 10:37 | #

They dare not make their ad hominem attacks in explicit terms; this would be why the roundabout musical cinematic reference would be used. There is a mask over the hidden statement that anyone who disagrees with free immmigration into a welfare society must be an advocate of first cousin marriage, or whatever they are trying to say. Actually it is liberal immigration policies which cause a steeep and alarming rise in the inbreeding coefficients locally, in the places cursed with such backward influxes.

Posted by Effra on Wed, 09 Mar 2005 14:02 | #

I saw the programme in question. Much of it was designed to quell fears that new members of the EU, formerly in Comecon, would send hundreds of thousands of permanent settlers to Britain. Malik went to Poland and found that few wanted to come here at all, and those who did wanted just to stay a while, earn a pile and go home.

He claimed that our economy would collapse without cheap foreign labour, visiting Boston (Lincs) to find immigrants illegally harvesting brussels sprouts and legally helping out in the NHS hospital. He did not consider how the labour market is ossified by avoiding the structural changes that labour shortages would stimulate, e.g. through mechanisation, or through reconsideration of whether we will need so many doctors and nurses as medicine becomes technologised and geneticised.

Even if he is not interested in prospects of autarchy, as a marxist Malik could have looked at mid-19C Britain and the impact of Factory and Mines Acts removing women and children from heavy labour. The economy did not instantly collapse then; it adapted.

Malik addressed the Third World immigration question only in the last ten minutes or so. The most interesting idea he put forward was that open borders might encourage more coming and going: fewer incomers would seek permanent homes here, no longer fearing that if they went home they would not be re-admitted to Britain.

The programme barely addressed non-economic objections to immigration except to assert that there are plenty of brownfield sites for housing. Malik ended with the usual ahistorical “we’re a nation of immigrants and we can’t change without stimulation by foreigners” line. However, he somewhat shot himself in the foot by citing a stream of upheavals in British society—women’s rights, universal suffrage, etc—which occurred when the country was 99% white.

Those who want to see the opposing viewpoint should watch Rod Liddle on Channel Four at 9pm on March 10. He will explore the demographic time-bomb argunents that Malik ignored.

Posted by Fred Scrooby on Wed, 09 Mar 2005 15:40 | #

People like this Malik character have some sort of neurotic disease in regard to societies made up white-Euro Christians:  such societies absolutely bug the hell out of them merely by existing.  (We could speculate as to why.)  Societies made up of non-white-Euro Christians are fine (Mexican peasants or Christian Negroes for example).  The foam doesn’t start frothing up around the corners of these peoples’ mouths at the thought of a white person alone, or at the thought of a Christian alone.  It has to be both combined in the same individual:  white, and Christian.  A Korean or Nigerian Christian doesn’t bother them.  A white Jew doesn’t bother them.  To get the mad-dog foam really running down their chins and dripping onto their shirt fronts, it’s got to be whiteness and Christianness combined in the same individual or as one prominant feature of a given society. 

These mentally-ill people absolutely cannot be content unless they’re working to undermine these white-Euro Christian societies’ whiteness, Euroness, and Christianness.  They can’t sleep nights unless they’re working as hard as they can—literally devoting their lives to it—to undermine and destroy white-Euro Christian societies. 

Now, that means us, of course, whom they’re working to destroy.  Normally our white-Euro Christian élites would fend them off with little difficulty—basically, would tell them where to go, tell ‘em to drop dead and that would be that.  But our élites have gone over to their side. 

Yes.  We all know that.  That shouldn’t surprise anyone any more.  Our élites are gone.  That giant sucking sound you heard?  Oh, that was our élites being sucked over to the other side’s camp.  Wave bye-bye to them—they’re all over there now.  (We could speculate on the reasons for that also.) 

That leaves just us.  We’d better start getting together and defending ourselves.  We’re hamstrung by the fact that half of society, half of voters, half of “public opinion,” are women, and women completely lack the neurons, completely lack the brain circuits, to conceive of those things men call countries, nations, races, and ethnocultures.  France to women is shopping in Paris and romantic candle-lit dinners with men with French accents.  That’s it.  There’s nothing else to France.  Where France came from, what makes it it, how it works, what will preserve it as it, women haven’t a clue and couldn’t care less.  Women can as soon understand what countries, nations, races, or ethnocultures are as men can breastfeed babies. 

Well, we’ll just have to deal with the woman-handicap our side is burdened with as we’ll have to deal with mortal-enemy genocidal lunatics like this Malik character. 

The thing is, we have to do it.

Posted by Guessedworker on Wed, 09 Mar 2005 18:54 | #

Effra,
Rod Liddle?  God help Truth, then.

Fred,
Great stuff.  Can dribbling have been more forcefully described?

However, I have a clear understanding of the way the immigration debate splits.  At bottom it’s not about open borders or demographic time-bombs.  It’s simple ethnic loyalty.  Either one is with Homo Europus or one is against him.  Homo Cosmospolitans will always find some way to rationalise the argument into seeming respectability.  But it is just racism.  The world is fixed around race and the struggle for resources.  Nothing can change that, short of a victory - the final solution - for the wrong side.