Plod cops it again from the anti-whitist establishment

Posted by Guessedworker on Tuesday, 08 March 2005 18:33.

Today that organ of unquestioning anti-racism, the Guardian, reports the Commission for Racial Equality’s latest Terror: 125 happy news ways (pdf file) to make Britain’s police force fit for our happy, happy, race-blind future.

Sir David Calvert-Smith, a benign-looking and perfectly white, former director of public prosecutions and now a high court judge, has authored the latest hate attack on – or, as he sees it, attack on hate in - the police forces of England and Wales.

His 300-page study concludes that the police are “frozen solid at the core”. The core, it seems, is middle management whose failure to be sufficiently anti-racist demonstrates “ice in the heart.” An interesting condition, for sure, and one suggestive of a certain immovable bottom line in what Nature can actually do with regard to not automatically preferring one’s own kind.

But this is the year 8 of our Smiling Pixie in Downing Street. Nature does not exist. White, heterosexual policemen are social constructs, just like you and me. Every blue-uniformed sinew, every corpuscle, every cell must bulge with effort - and not merely to dodge the Anti-Racist Terror and stay in the job. No, Officers must treat themselves harshly and without respite as they eliminate all impulses consequent upon nicking yet another black crim. Two and two makes five. The Multi-Cult does not tolerate anything less than five. It does not tolerate anything less than absolute tolerance for our black, brown and somewhat sallow brothers, criminal or otherwise.

Oh joy, that we share this tiny patch of Tony’s earth with such wondrous – and, of course, all equally wondrous - creatures. And Tony cares so much for our impure white souls that he works all this liberating self-reconstruction for us not once, through the agency of Sir David Double-Race-Traitor, but oftimes in the only too recent past. And will do again, in the only too likely future.

Cunsternoon Afterble. It was nice knowing you.

Tags: Cultural Marxism

Comments:

Posted by Geoff Beck on Tue, 08 Mar 2005 19:14 | #

I remember watching a British WWII documentary film about pilots that were trained to bomb German dams.

The mission commenced when the commander uttered the word “nigger”. If I’m not mistaken the entire mission was named “Operation Nigger”.

It seems the commander of the mission had a black labrador dog whose name was “nigger”. I was shocked to discover that the word was broadcast in the documentary film created sometime in the ‘90s, I guess.

Posted by Effra on Tue, 08 Mar 2005 20:18 | #

Geoff: TV has recently transmitted prints of the film (‘The Dam Busters’, 1956) with the appalling word bleeped out.

Posted by ben tillman on Tue, 08 Mar 2005 20:35 | #

Well, you can always watch “The Wall”, in which the “offending scene” is watched by the protagaonist.

Posted by ben tillman on Tue, 08 Mar 2005 20:39 | #

Wow—these bureaucrats absolutely butcher the English language!

Posted by Phil Peterson on Tue, 08 Mar 2005 21:35 | #

“It seems the commander of the mission had a black labrador dog whose name was “nigger”.”

It would be an interesting question to ask: would the brave RAF pilots who spilt their blood and flew their planes into the range of the brutally precise Luftwaffe have done so if they could see a snapshot of “free” Britain in the year 2005?

Posted by Guessedworker on Tue, 08 Mar 2005 22:03 | #

Phil,

As the son of an RAF Lancaster pilot I can tell you that they would not have been able to conceive the possibility of what has been done to their beloved land and motherland. No politician or public intellectual would have been able to propose it. When a handful of blacks arrived in the years between 1948 and 1954 the English were told that these alien people would not be staying. This whole situation has arisen through the employment of official deception and censorship.

Posted by john rackell on Tue, 08 Mar 2005 23:11 | #

Who knows what the ultimate motivations of the pilots were? For sure they were animated by devotion and love of country, some anyway, but even in the RAF the country may not have been Britain. Poles, Canadian, Americans all flew in Fighter Command and Bomber command. In fact the Israeli air force was formed from fighter pilots who’d served in the wartime RAF and then turned around to kill Britons in Palestine.

People have many different motivations to serve. Why did they risk their lives to drop bombs on Germans. Because they were told to do so and they did it.

Why were the police officers who busted up Nick Griffins house just before Christmas acting for the forces of a fascist regime. Are they doing it out of patriotism, honor or just because they were told to do it. All the honor and patriotism belongs to Nick Griffin et al. who are resisting the assault on liberty and democracy peacefully.

The police are quite decent individually but they have no individual conscience other than to serve their masters.

So you ask what would the men of the RAF have thought of the changes. I’d say they would have been happy enforcing the regimes policies using any strong arm tactics without it disturbing their consciences.

Posted by Guessedworker on Wed, 09 Mar 2005 00:36 | #

Actually, John, I’m not sure there is a meaningful or direct comparison to be made between the modern police force and Bomber Command aircrew.

The latter were extremely high quality volunteers. A third were made officers anyway. But had they gone instead into the Army, many more would have been commissioned.

Almost to a man they had joined up with the intention of flying single-seaters in Fighter Command. The Battle of Britain was the greatest recruiting campaign of all time. All but the most natural flyers, however, found themselves on a conveyor elsewhere - mostly to Bomber Command, a fate they would have earnestly hoped to avoid.

Thereafter, duty and discipline certainly took over and there was zero consideration, as there had to be, of events under the bombs they dropped. But to compare these people, fighting for the survival of their country in wartime, with the ill-educated, career-minded modern police constable is a covering an awful lot of ground in one leap. Not sure it’s really useful to try.

Posted by Fred Scrooby on Wed, 09 Mar 2005 00:52 | #

“Why were the police officers who busted up Nick Griffin’s house just before Christmas acting for the forces of a fascist regime? Are they doing it out of patriotism, honor or just because they were told to do it? All the honor and patriotism belongs to Nick Griffin et al. who are resisting the assault on liberty and democracy peacefully.” (—John Rackell)

That utterly unjustifiable and unspeakable dawn raid on Griffin’s home, and his retention under arrest some twelve hours for interrogation, was a David Blunkett operation, was it not?

Blunkett’s name and acts are, I trust, burned into everyone’s memories ...

Posted by Geoff Beck on Wed, 09 Mar 2005 00:57 | #

Ok… let throw in something else… and I admit I may be stepping in manure: Blunkett is both a Scot and a Homo? Right?

Or wait, who is the guy that sits next to Blair in “PM’s Question Time”, he’s a homo, too?

Sounds to me like the gay mafia at work.

Posted by john rackell on Wed, 09 Mar 2005 01:34 | #

Well Sir David Calvert-Smith, as head of Public Prosecutions is no mean sort of bloke himself in terms of education and professional achievement. He just happened to be the top policeman.

As director of CPS he got to instigate prosecutions under the Race Acts of any dissenter of multiculturalism. It’s one thing for a dissenter to take on a bunch on nitwit liberal academics it’s another thing to take on the entire wait of the British judicial/police system. He is the real power behind the multicultural managerial state.

I’m interested in his motivations and others like him. Is he just a career minded ideologue or does he act out of a sense of service? And how can Bliar’s regime rely on the unquestioning loyalty of everyone from head of CPS to PC Plod who actually does the billy clubbing, to carry out the dismantling of Britain.

I think there are many decent people who because duty and discipline to their country are working against the best interests of their own country. They act in a similar fashion to the firebombers of Dresden who must have felt some pangs of conscience but did it anyway.

Posted by Lurker on Wed, 09 Mar 2005 03:45 | #

GW - At the risk of sounding like a wet liberal if it had only been a handful every year it would not have been a problem esp with selection for education & training etc. We could have lived with that.

Posted by - on Wed, 09 Mar 2005 16:04 | #

...if it had only been a handful every year…

In practice the handful are not inert and, especially selected for intelligence, will have an influence on future policies. Democratic systems will tend to suffer from positive feedback.