Two messengers but only one message

Posted by Guessedworker on Saturday, 05 March 2005 21:46.

Le jour où nous aurons en France, non plus 5 millions mais 25 millions de musulmans, ce sont eux qui commanderont. Et les Français raseront les murs, descendront des trottoirs en baissant les yeux

Jean-Marie Le Pen, explaining to anyone who will listen that, “The day when we have not five million but twenty-five million Muslims in France, it will be they who rule. And the French will stick against the wall, jump in the gutter and lower their eyes.

Of course, it brought him another conviction and fine from the (anti-) French establishment. He’s been collecting them since the 1960’s. His stubborness and verbal extravagance have cost him in excess of $200,000. I think it’s safe to say he doesn’t much care about that. For the desperate and the irredeemable any publicity is good publicity. In that bullish, foolhardy-brave way he has, Le Pen is perfectly irredeemable. And, if you happen to be one of those, of course, extreme far right French nationalists, he is undeniably inspiring.

Cosmopolitan-crazed liberals are contemptuous of the French claim to France. So Le Pen’s every word, his every gesture only earns their enmity. And since it is, incredibly, their opinions which guide moral judgements in France they can be as hateful and harmful towards him as they like. He will never be free of them. At least, not until they are free of their own hate.

How frustrating, then, that the European Monitoring Centre on Racism and Xenophobia’s 2003 report on the rising tide of anti-semitism had to be suppressed because it blamed not Le Pen’s, of course, extreme far right French nationalists but … those Musulmans. And to compound the frustration, there is news that perhaps as many as sixty thousand Juifs Francais are seeking to demonstrate agreement in the most sincere way. Seeing only a future for the multicultural paradise that resembles the Caliphate they can’t wait to make aliya.

What kind of message does that send to the average, as yet not very liberal Frenchman - who can’t run anywhere? Vote FN? At the very least, he can’t doubt that Moslem violence in France is growing, as the Jewish exodus attests … and the Moslem influence will only get greater the more Moslems there are, as Jean-Marie keeps saying.

The liberal elite will keep right on convicting the man. But who really believes that he doesn’t have a point?

Tags: European Nationalism

Comments:

Posted by Stuka on Sat, 05 Mar 2005 22:54 | #

And, if you happen to be one of those, of course, extreme far right French nationalists…

Hell, I’m an American white nationalist and I find the guy inspiring. If only we had the equivalent here. I had the chance to meet Le Pen at the Bleu Blanc Rouge festival in 1999, but sadly couldn’t make it. I pray that Le Pen and FN continue speaking truth to power. Truth will out.

Posted by Phil Peterson on Sat, 05 Mar 2005 23:05 | #

France hasn’t gone past tipping point just yet as have Denmark and Holland.

This article quite beautifully paints a political picture:

http://www.timesonline.co.uk/article/0,,2099-1488514,00.html

The question for France is not whether but when. The sooner the better.

Posted by Geoff Beck on Sat, 05 Mar 2005 23:18 | #

His stubborness and verbal extravagance have cost him in excess of $200,000.

Where can I send him money?

Posted by Geoff Beck on Sat, 05 Mar 2005 23:45 | #

David Irving… I noticed the link to David Irving’s website.

I’ve yet to read his books. The reviews I’ve read of <u>Hitler’s War</u> are all praiseworthy. After reviewing his site for several days… I’ve got to say this: he’s got moxy!

I bet the British racial justice police read every syllable he types. (oh, yes I am familiar with the trial. Did you know that our very own Kevin MacDonald testified).

Posted by Phil Peterson on Sat, 05 Mar 2005 23:53 | #

Yes the media crowd loves David and he gives it back to them.

The reason Irving is hated with such a passion is that he is extremely bright and can rip into the arguments of the opposition with gusto. And, his German is impeccable so he can’t be fooled by any “interpretations” of Third Reich documents. Also, he often cuts through the “official” interpretations to point out their inaccuracies.

In fact, if I am not mistaken, a German Court has now prohibited him from accessing certain documents which he had himself discovered. Anyway, I had better not go on a tangent here as we are talking about Le Pen!

Posted by Fred Scrooby on Sun, 06 Mar 2005 01:37 | #

“I pray that Le Pen and FN continue speaking truth to power.”

I pray that Le Pen becomes the leader of France and halts immigration both legal and illegal, then takes steps to redress that country’s accumulated racial/ethnocultural imbalance by a policy of humane repatriations including generous monetary compensations to individuals and families who are sent back to wherever they came from. I pray that all those who deliberately engineered this policy of attempted racial/cultural murder of France, this genocide disguised as normalness, be brought to justice and punished as severely as possible for their high treason to their country (and to Western Civilization). The crime that has been perpetrated has not been the fault of the immigrants but of these French élites.

Posted by Fred Scrooby on Sun, 06 Mar 2005 01:49 | #

I omitted to include perhaps the most important: I pray that together with all the rest, he remove the many intolerable financial, educational, social, and tax barriers and burdens which together lower the native white French birth rate, in order that the French nation once again be able to reproduce itself, as any healthy nation does.

Posted by Matra on Sun, 06 Mar 2005 06:24 | #

Sadly, in 2002 when the French people had the choice between Le Pen and the multicultural crook Chirac they chose the latter by a four to one margin. They get what they damn well deserve.

I think we’re at the point where a few sacrificial nations may be required. That may be the only thing to wake up the masses. The end of liberal Holland or California, or the destruction of Israel will, as they used to say during the Northern Ireland peace talks, concentrate minds. Until minds are fully concentrated on the the real fight of the future to save not just individual western nations but our entire civilisation we will continue to see elections fought over trivial matters like economic growth and “freedom” in Iraq.

Posted by Guessedworker on Sun, 06 Mar 2005 09:05 | #

I am sure you are correct, Matra. The short-term, self-interested focus of the voter, abetted by the liberal possession of the media, is the obstacle to awakening.

Fred, the French have generous tax allowances for having kids and this has kept France at the top of the European child-bearing league. Insomuch as it is predicated on fecundity rather than new immigration, the timescale for a Moslem majority is lengthened thereby. But delay is the only effect.

There are childbirth figures available for the different sections of the French population yet there is no official figure for the non-white population - this being too politically incorrect to disseminate, I suppose.

In any case, even to have to plot the graph of population transfer is an act of defeatism. There should be no population transfer.

Posted by Braveheart on Sun, 06 Mar 2005 09:49 | #

How to wake up the masses? But why the FN continues to stick to approximately 20% at the polls in France?

I immediately see several reasons.

1)Indeed there are in France about 600 centres were people live like in Senegal or Morocco. But France is very big and relatively low populated, so people on the countryside are perhaps less confronted with the problems.
2)This: http://www.frontnational.com/accueil.php Too much Le Pen. One leader can be dangerous in the perception, certainly when he sometimes condones what happened in the second world war.
3)The voting system. In France, where the candidate who gets the majority in the district gets the seat. In Belgium there is a semi-proportionate system with a bias to the bigger parties. Now Vlaams Belang is moving in the direction of 30%, but approximately 40% of the votes (with the other parties much splintered) will give Vlaams Belang an absolute majority. So there is the expectation that something can really change.

Posted by Guessedworker on Sun, 06 Mar 2005 11:39 | #

It needs to be stressed that VB is a Conservative party. The implication for an awakening Flemish electorate is therefore different from elsewhere in Europe where white racial loyalties are easily tarred by the “extreme far right” tag.

In Flanders the voter has the possibility to hear the constant accusations but can look at VB and say, “No, it is not they who are the extremists but you, the accuser.”

For me, the really interesting aspect of a VB victory in Flanders would come after the state of Belgium is “buried”. What will a VB government do about demographics and how will it rationalise it within a Conservative philosophy?

Posted by Braveheart on Sun, 06 Mar 2005 11:50 | #

I suppose some of you already have read Theodore Dalrymple’s book Life At The Bottom: The Worldview That Makes The Underclass?

Wallonia is already for 75% that situation. VB won’t let such things happen in Flanders. The colour of one’s skin is not important.

Flanders,

Posted by Guessedworker on Sun, 06 Mar 2005 12:10 | #

What is the current balance of white to non-white in the population of Flanders?

Posted by Braveheart on Sun, 06 Mar 2005 12:19 | #

I think this to be a well-kept secret, but I don’t think it to be very different from Holland. In general there it is 3/16. And of course with a concentration in the old city centres. Brussels is the real social disaster.

Posted by Guessedworker on Sun, 06 Mar 2005 12:24 | #

And I guess the bias is heavily male and young while the indigenous population is aging and not replacing. This is the conveyor to a future non-white majority. Flanders cannot exist unless it is racially Flemish. So how would a VB government address this greatest of all issues, once they have detached from Wallonia?

Posted by Braveheart on Sun, 06 Mar 2005 14:25 | #

It is difficult to know what happens in Flemish Interest’s mind, because I have my doubts whether this might be 100% conform the European treaty on Human Rights and so in that case the party could be banned immediately if they speak their true mind.

The latest I have heard is that they plan to set up committees in the endangered city centres and these will have to decide upon the extent to which immigrants have already assimilated.

Posted by Guessedworker on Sun, 06 Mar 2005 19:40 | #

Pan-governmenal structures and pan-national laws are inherently un-Conservative, since Conservatism attends to local interest. A government which is genuinely expressive of its own people’s interests cannot stand in submission to pan-anything. And, in fact, European treaties signed by liberal politicians of a generally internationalist mind are only meant to protect the status quo as it exists in Europe today.

I await the day that our Conservative politicians demonstrate some understanding of their and our plight. As it is,to them metapolitics might as well be advanced calculus. “Forgive them, oh voter, they do not know they are liberals.”