Another dramatic degradation of Russia’s combat capacity

Posted by Guessedworker on Wednesday, 23 April 2025 08:49.

none

One way to address the betrayal of the Trump administration in denying war materiel to the Ukrainians is to deny war materiel to the Russian aggressor.  Yesterday afternoon a series of powerful explosions rocked the Kirzhatsky district of the Volodymyr region of Russia.  The regional Ministry of Emergency Situations issued an emergency warning asking local residents to avoid the village of Barsovo, which really means the 51st Arsenal of the DRAU of the Main Missile and Artillery Directorate of the Ministry of Defense.

Located east of Moscow and 530 km from the border with Ukraine, this site is covered by the most concentrated air defense system in the whole of Russia.  It has an approximate area is 3.5 sq km.  Its design capacity is 264,000 tons of various ammunition.  In total there are forty-five separate covered facilities and thirty external storage points.  In the aftermath of the Ukrainian strike the explosions are continuing today.  Russia kept significant reserves of artillery shells at the site, plus missiles of various types including “Iskander”, “Point-U”, “Dagger”, ammunition for the Pansir-S1, S-300, and S-400, as well as “Grad”, “Smerch”, “Hurricane” rockets.  Ukraine’s UNION information agency reported the comments of Pavlo Narozhny, a Ukrainian military expert:

It is difficult to estimate the exact scale of losses as a result of the explosion at the Russian arsenal in the Kirzhatsky district of the Volodymyr region, because Russia hides such information. 

“You can give a rough estimate. 200,000 tons of ammunition was in this arsenal. If we imagine that these were exclusively artillery ammunition, then each projectile weighs about 100 kg, that is, it is 2 million artillery shells. Of course, there were not only artillery shells, but also rockets, rockets, etc. 2 million shells is approximately the annual production of shells of the Russian Federation and the DPRK combined”, Narozhny said.

He noted that this is a significant blow to the military capabilities of the Russians, which is almost impossible to quickly restore. The expert also called the possibility of extinguishing the fire at the arsenal “unreal”.

“Yes, they have special machines for simmering such fires. But in reality it does not work. In reality, it is impossible to stop it. There were shells for MLRS, rockets. Such a missile catches fire from fire, an uncontrolled launch occurs, and it can fly anywhere - both 100 meters and 10 kilometers. And other missiles, decomposed in clean air, begin to explode from it… We can say that 90 percent of this arsenal has been lost”, Narozhny added.

As a result of the on-going degradation in the number of Russian artillery pieces as well as similar strikes last September on very large-scale Russian ammunition storage facilities, the artillery offset in favour of Russia, which has generally been 10:1, reduced to an average of 3:1, even reaching parity in certain key areas.  It is only that “good” for the Russians because of the two million (variable quality) shells delivered from store by North Korea.  This latest strike will have a like impact, and will hopefully much reduce the use of ballistic missiles against civilian targets.



Comments: None.



Post a comment:


Name: (required)

Email: (required but not displayed)

URL: (optional)

Note: You should copy your comment to the clipboard or paste it somewhere before submitting it, so that it will not be lost if the session times out.

Remember me



Previous entry: France24 puts an end to Moscow’s lie about the attack on Kryvyi Riy

image of the day

Existential Issues

DNA Nations

Establishment Problem

Categories

Contributors

Each author's name links to a list of all articles posted by the writer.

Links

Endorsement not implied.

Immigration

Islamist Threat

Anti-white Media Networks

Audio/Video

Crime

Economics

Education

General

Historical Re-Evaluation

Controlled Opposition

Nationalist Political Parties

Science

Europeans in Africa

Of Note

Comments

Thorn commented in entry 'If this is an inflection point' on Wed, 23 Apr 2025 10:49. (View)

Guessedworker commented in entry 'A British woman in Ukraine and an observer of Putin's war' on Wed, 23 Apr 2025 07:20. (View)

Guessedworker commented in entry 'If this is an inflection point' on Wed, 23 Apr 2025 07:04. (View)

Thorn commented in entry 'A British woman in Ukraine and an observer of Putin's war' on Tue, 22 Apr 2025 23:30. (View)

Thorn commented in entry 'If this is an inflection point' on Mon, 21 Apr 2025 22:21. (View)

Guessedworker commented in entry 'If this is an inflection point' on Mon, 21 Apr 2025 15:06. (View)

Thorn commented in entry 'If this is an inflection point' on Mon, 21 Apr 2025 11:25. (View)

Guessedworker commented in entry 'If this is an inflection point' on Sun, 20 Apr 2025 23:41. (View)

Thorn commented in entry 'If this is an inflection point' on Sun, 20 Apr 2025 11:10. (View)

Guessedworker commented in entry 'If this is an inflection point' on Sat, 19 Apr 2025 14:00. (View)

Thorn commented in entry 'If this is an inflection point' on Sat, 19 Apr 2025 11:51. (View)

Guessedworker commented in entry 'If this is an inflection point' on Fri, 18 Apr 2025 21:35. (View)

Thorn commented in entry 'If this is an inflection point' on Fri, 18 Apr 2025 18:13. (View)

Guessedworker commented in entry 'If this is an inflection point' on Fri, 18 Apr 2025 16:25. (View)

Guessedworker commented in entry 'If this is an inflection point' on Fri, 18 Apr 2025 16:20. (View)

James Bowery commented in entry 'If this is an inflection point' on Fri, 18 Apr 2025 15:41. (View)

Thorn commented in entry 'If this is an inflection point' on Fri, 18 Apr 2025 12:03. (View)

Guessedworker commented in entry 'If this is an inflection point' on Fri, 18 Apr 2025 11:58. (View)

Thorn commented in entry 'If this is an inflection point' on Fri, 18 Apr 2025 11:12. (View)

Guessedworker commented in entry 'If this is an inflection point' on Fri, 18 Apr 2025 08:33. (View)

Thorn commented in entry 'If this is an inflection point' on Thu, 17 Apr 2025 23:30. (View)

James Bowery commented in entry 'If this is an inflection point' on Thu, 17 Apr 2025 15:23. (View)

Thorn commented in entry 'If this is an inflection point' on Thu, 17 Apr 2025 12:03. (View)

Thorn commented in entry 'If this is an inflection point' on Wed, 16 Apr 2025 22:57. (View)

Thorn commented in entry 'If this is an inflection point' on Wed, 16 Apr 2025 19:40. (View)

James Bowery commented in entry 'If this is an inflection point' on Wed, 16 Apr 2025 19:23. (View)

Guessedworker commented in entry 'If this is an inflection point' on Wed, 16 Apr 2025 16:27. (View)

Thorn commented in entry 'If this is an inflection point' on Tue, 15 Apr 2025 22:47. (View)

Thorn commented in entry 'If this is an inflection point' on Mon, 14 Apr 2025 19:58. (View)

Guessedworker commented in entry 'If this is an inflection point' on Mon, 14 Apr 2025 12:31. (View)

Thorn commented in entry 'If this is an inflection point' on Mon, 14 Apr 2025 11:53. (View)

Thorn commented in entry 'If this is an inflection point' on Mon, 14 Apr 2025 10:50. (View)

Thorn commented in entry 'If this is an inflection point' on Mon, 14 Apr 2025 10:44. (View)

Guessedworker commented in entry 'If this is an inflection point' on Mon, 14 Apr 2025 07:39. (View)

Thorn commented in entry 'If this is an inflection point' on Fri, 11 Apr 2025 16:11. (View)

affection-tone