|
Defining the borders of the English kin-group
No people should be required to define itself to prove that it exists. Arguing for its non-existence at a time when the nation’s borders have been opened and millions of strangers are pouring in is a deeply immoral act. But in the white world there is no shortage of sick minds who don’t know or care about morality, and are not actually interested in proofs anyway. They don’t ask for definitions because they are interested in a substantive answer. They ask because they think definition is impossible, and they will have an easy victory. Their sole objective is to win, and no speaking of truths, no explanation of the facts will impact them. That is one of the defining differences of left and right, actually. Getting on for twenty years ago now I started thinking about a working definition for the English, and found the task not so difficult after all. I have employed the resultant form of words many times over the years. At first there was quite a high rate of challenge. But the definition always prevailed. No one even dented it. Now I find that the madness and delusion of my interlocutors has deepened … is deepening ... and their conversation has become ever briefer and weaker. I used the definition again today and added some notes to back it up. There was no challenge. This was it: A suggested definition of the English people Subject to gene-flow from neighbouring territories, the English are the people wholly related to the non-immigrants, non-Irish and non-Jews present in England on 22nd June 1948, when the HMT Empire Windrush sailed into British territorial waters. Notes i. The format is governed by descent from within the group. ii. The named excluded groups have their own particular ethnicities. Their progeny are not necessarily excluded from the gene flow as per (iii) below if one parent meets the definition. iii. The selection of 22nd June 1948 is to distinguish between naturally-arising variation in the population and politically-engineered change, the latter being deemed an artificial impost denying the very existence of the English. Naturally-arising variation must be accommodated because gene flow from neighbouring territories is one of the four modes of genetic variation in Nature (the other three being selection, mutation, and drift). iv. The same format can also be used for the Scots and Welsh just by swapping the relevant terms English and England. For British nationality combining the three peoples, the term British would be swapped for English and the phrase Great Britain would be swapped for England. v. A separate definition would be required for the Northern Irish. Comments: None.Post a comment:
|
|
Existential IssuesDNA NationsCategoriesContributorsEach author's name links to a list of all articles posted by the writer. LinksEndorsement not implied. Immigration
Islamist Threat
Anti-white Media Networks Audio/Video
Crime
Economics
Education General
Historical Re-Evaluation Controlled Opposition
Nationalist Political Parties
Science Europeans in Africa
Of Note MR Central & News |