A crisis in the custody suite – part 1

Posted by Guessedworker on Friday, 08 December 2017 18:41.

A cautionary tale for policemen

All morning, John Holly lay sleepless on the thin, blue plastic mattress in his cell. Several times he heard the sounds of activity in the corridor outside, metal doors slamming shut, once some shouting.  But beyond a couple of momentary check-ups through the panel in the door and the arrival of WPC Brook with sweet, weak tea in a plastic cup, no one took any interest in him at all.  It seemed that the Metropolitan Police Service was not used to suspects putting a large spoke in its little procedural wheel.

It had all gone horribly wrong for the Met four long and lonely hours earlier, in Holly’s initial interview, following his arrest at home in the small hours.  The fall guy had been the glotally challenged Detective Sergeant Kevin Boulder, seated across the table from him and the duty solicitor, a Miss Agarwal, in Interview Room 1.

“An ‘ate crime,” Boulder had confidently begun in the approved ex cathedra sing-song of the local comp boy made plod, “is a crime that the victim or any uvver person perceives to be motivated by ‘ostility or prejudice towards any aspect of a person’s identity.  In this case we are dealin’ wiv ‘ostility or prejudice based on a person’s race or perceived race.  If the investigatin’ officer is satisfied that the offence took place as described by the victim ...”

“Prakash Ghosh,” interjected Holly, plainly stating a fact he knew only too well.

Miss Agarwal shifted in her seat.

“I am unable to disclose the victim’s precise identity at interview under caution,” replied Boulder, “That information will only be supplied if, at the conclusion of this investigation, a formal charge is laid.”

“But it was Ghosh,” Holly shot back, “You know it.  I know it.”

READ MORE...


Zog mouthpiece Trump recognizes Jerusalem as Israel’s capital among litany of consolidating affronts

Posted by DanielS on Thursday, 07 December 2017 01:26.

Trump signs recognition of Jerusalem as Israel’s capital.

In a speech that Benjamin Netanyahu actually oversaw in drafting, Trump announced that the US will officially recognize Jerusalem as Israel’s capital.

This will please nobody but Israel, some right wing YKW and some bible thumping rapture bunnies from America’s Jesus belt.

At the same time it has played into the “crusader” rhetoric of ISIL and other Islamic fundamentalists, as inspiration for more terror.

Further, having firmly taken the side of Israel has neutered The US as a negotiator in the region; while defacto yielding greater influence of negotiation in the region to Putin, as he gains in appearance of neutrality (he isn’t neutral; he’s in Israel’s pocket as well) and increases The Russian Federation’s bargaining position in the Middle East.

That is just the start.

The most fundamental plank of Trump’s candidacy was to undo the Iran deal. A move that is good for nobody, but because Israel wants it, a motion which has been key to facilitating Trump’s presidency.

The Iran deal had paved the way for well considered, slow, steady liberalization of Iran that would allow other nations linked though the Silk Road to benefit with them through trade; while its undoing will increase fundamentalist Islamic reaction; combined with radicalization and destabilization of its regime, perhaps the resumption of Iran’s nuclear program and an increasing risk of world cataclysmic war - world war III.

The announcement of ZOG’s further consolidation - Jerusalem recognized as capital of Israel - comes, of course, after Trump and Kushner have armed Saudi to the umpteenth degree and endorsed its consolidating of Zion complicit power aimed in alignment with Israel against Iran.

Kushner Is Leaving Tillerson in the Dark on Middle East Talks.

All because ZOG wants that. And make no mistake, again, the Russian Federation is ZOG as well; it’s imperialist, parasitic oil business would be one of the few beneficiaries from a war with Iran.

“Israeli Defense Minister: ‘I Prefer ISIS to Iran on Our Borders”

Jewish wars have already cost the lives of so many Americans, Europeans and our allies; not to mention being a waste of our economic and military resource - the military budget has devastated the American economy.

This affront comes with a litany of moves by the Trump administration to consolidate ZOG’s grip at the expense of others.

Israel, already the recipient of some 10million dollars a day in foreign aid (according to former President Carter) has only had its aid increased; while Trump’s new tax bill cuts taxes for the wealthiest Americans, which would include, of course, disproportionate benefit to the YKW among right wing cohorts. At the same time the bill increases tax on those making less than 75k; and because the bill (naturally) still leaves a tremendous deficit, ZOG takes aim at cutting Social Security and Medicaid - note that White Americans are an older demographic.

Meanwhile: Americans do not pay into Social Security beyond yearly earnings of $127,500.  Why not?

The list of horrific ZOG effrontery goes on:

- For Jews, Supporting Trump is a Moral Imperative.

- Donald Trump gives Benjamin Netanyahu everything he wants.
  Posted by Kumiko Oumae on Thursday, 16 February 2017.

- Trump and his cyber ‘czar’ Giuliani want to outsource US cybersecurity. Can you guess where-to?
  Posted by Kumiko Oumae on Saturday, 14 January 2017.

- Only The US Remains in Support, Israel’s Illegal Settlements Rest on the Alt-Right’s Trump
  Posted by DanielS on Monday, 26 December 2016.

- Is Donald Trump playing 181 dimensional underwater jenga-chess? (Hint: No.)
  Posted by Kumiko Oumae on Monday, 05 December 2016.

- Russian Foreign Ministry Spokeswoman: Trump Won Thanks To ‘The Jews’
  Posted by DanielS on Monday, 21 November 2016.

- Alt-Right or Alt-Lite? It’s worse than you think.
  Posted by Kumiko Oumae on Friday, 18 November 2016.

The Alt-Right is a trendy facade that Paul Gottfried placed atop Frank Meyer’s paleoconservatism, a rightist fig leaf to mask, control and direct a myriad of right wing reactionaries; to go against any upstart left ethnonationalism that might awaken and respond as the YKW and right wing sell-outs have consolidated power upon the 2008 US real estate bust.

- We Told You So: Trump Panders to Israel - among his pandering at AIPAC, Trump promised that Jerusalem would become the capital of Israel.


The litany of ZOG effrontery goes on, our readers might care to note…


Jez on great form

Posted by Guessedworker on Tuesday, 28 November 2017 07:18.

Great to see Jez Turner, after his latest appearance in a British court, so energised and strong, ripping into the Jewish activist apparatus and the complicity of the British state which, together, seek to silence him and, through him, all of us.

I reproduce below a lengthy comment from the YouTube thread.  There is quite a bit that could be said about whether this whole affair was really necessary for all concerned, even for Messers Falter and Silberman - who of course, may win just by default, despite what looks from the outside like a perilously weak case.  But now is not the time to do that.  Now is the time to praise Jez and wish him success.  If he does succeed and win his freedom it will be interesting to talk to him about the effects of that on our future speech, and we should certainly seek to do that.

From the thread:

Sophie Johnson 12 minutes ago

Superb sight, superb sound: the upright Englishman who declines to be intimidated by the moral dwarves of public and political life. Did Theresa May and Amber Rudd ever pause to think that Jez Turner will respond to the viscious attack on him by their close associates (the unsavoury Gideon Falter and friends of the CAA) as the event that licenses his public exposure of them all?  I doubt it. That cabal of moral zeros thought they had ‘got’ Jez intimidated, and with that, anyone else who might dare raise a voice against them. How wrong they were!

Still, this situation must give us pause: As Jez explains in his habitually firm and clear voice, the justice system in England and Wales has fallen vicitim to Zionist occupation. His own case illustrates this: The DPP and the CPS had decided correctedly that he will not be prosecuted for his criticism of the Shomrim and the associated Zionist behaviours in this country because he had done nothing wrong, despite Gideon Falter’s backroom dealings.

So what is happening? This: The DPP and CPS did not even wait for the outcome of the High Court Judicial Review initiated by Falter and the CAA; instead, they just agreed that Jez has to be prosecuted under Article 17 of the ECHR. So Jez is now before the Crown Court.

But will the DDP also be before the Crown Court to explain her change of mind? She had previously decided unequivocally that Jez Turner had done nothing wrong, so there is no ground on which to prosecute him, and it would not be in the public interest to prosecute him. So why did she change her mind with such alacrity? Will she be called before the Crown Court to explain? No: She will not. Why?

And will Falter the liar who claimed to have heard Jez’s Shomrim speech and been mortally offended by it be before the Crown Court to explain why he and his had lobbied the Executive Government so hard to cause the DPP to change her mind about prosecuting Jez? No: he will not. Why?

So here we have it: The zealous overturners of the judicial system of England and Wales: certain members of the Executive Government, the DPP and the morally faulty Falter of the CAA, have no case to answer. But Jez Turner, who exercised his right to self expression and did nothing wrong, is being tried by the Crwon Court.  Is there not a goodly touch of Alice in Wonderland in this? And is the British public not outraged? Probably not, for the public has not heard about this: our Zionist occupied ‘mainstream media’ is as silent as the tomb.


FCC doubles down on dead-wrong definition of how internet works

Posted by DanielS on Sunday, 26 November 2017 01:33.

Tech Crunch, “FCC doubles down on its dead-wrong definition of how the internet works”, 25 Nov 2017:

In May, when the FCC released an early draft of its plan to undo 2015’s strong net neutrality rules, I pointed out that its case rests almost entirely on a deeply incorrect definition of how the internet works. There can be no mistake now that this misrepresentation is deliberate; the agency has reiterated it in even stronger terms in the final draft of the proposal.

I’m not going to go into great detail on it (my earlier post spells it out) but the basic problem is this: broadband has to be defined as either an information service or telecommunications service. The first is “the offering of a capability for generating, acquiring, storing, transforming, processing, retrieving, utilizing, or making available information,” while the second is “the transmission, between or among points specified by the user, of information of the user’s choosing, without change in the form or content of the information as sent and received.”

It’s important because the two things are regulated very differently — the FCC has much greater power over telecommunications services, under the “Title II” authority that internet service providers are so afraid of.

While it’s certainly true that ISPs do in some ways store and generate data on behalf of the user, usually as part of managing their networks, it’s equally certain that their primary purpose is to transmit data between the user and points of his or her choosing. Consequently, broadband should be classified as a telecommunications service.

But don’t take my word for it. The FCC made the argument for me in its 2015 order, citing many sources of its own in support of this fact. This excellent primer produced by the EFF and nearly 200 experts explains basically from first principles how the internet works and why it should be defined as telecommunications. There are big names on the list, but it seems clear that even the garden variety experts understand this much more clearly than the FCC does (or pretends to).

The FCC dismisses these scholars and founding technologists of the internet in a footnote, describing itself as “unpersuaded” that the internet works the way they insist it does. Meanwhile, the proposal repeatedly and unquestioningly cites the comments of ISPs claiming that something as simple as caching data magically exempts them from being telecommunication services:


Just trust them — after all, it’s not like they have a horse in this race.

The FCC’s case against net neutrality rests on a deliberate misrepresentation of how the internet works”, Tech Crunch 23 May 2017

The resulting definition of broadband as enabling users to generate, store, transform, and process their data is absurd. It is, as the Internet Engineers comment points out, like saying your phone is a pizzeria because you can use it to order a pizza. It is like saying that because you build a road, you are also building all the businesses along that road.

It is edge providers like Wikipedia, Dropbox, and even simple websites like TechCrunch that provide the services users request; it is ISPs that carry that data, with no change in form, between users and those edge providers. The FCC rejects this fundamental idea and substitutes a convenient fiction that upholds its current ambition to reclassify broadband. There is a semblance of plausibility to all this, but only because of precedents set in times when the internet looked very different.

This may be their downfall. Because the entire proposal is predicated on this spurious and outdated definition, to remove it causes the rest to crumble. Without reclassification there is no rollback of net neutrality. There is hope here: the FCC’s argument (which is to say, the broadband industry’s argument) already failed in court and may do so again. Here’s hoping. - Devin Coldewey

        Previously at MR, regarding net neutrality.


With all this exposing of sexual harassment, lording of privilege, White men need some lessons

Posted by DanielS on Wednesday, 22 November 2017 03:20.

Counter-Currents, “Who’s Doing the Raping? - Aedon Cassiel

A meme circulating around social media after the revelations of Harvey Weinstein’s behavior said, “If you’re a man, don’t say anything to a woman that you wouldn’t want a man saying to you in prison.”

       
        Virulent bracket (((David Mamet))) scripts White male abuse of power; and
        narrates their ‘come-uppance’ from Oleana (1994, above) to Edmund (2005, below)

             

Ibid:

The fact remains that blacks continually and almost exclusively rape whites in prison. The evidence is based on studies conducted over the last 40 years (Davis 1968; Nacci 1978; Lookwood 1980; Starchild 1990). Why does this white victim preference prevail? Whites continue to be raped more severely and frequently and at a disproportionate rate than any other racial or ethnic group (in Gones 1967; Bowker 1980; Lookwood 1980). This racial inequality may be the largest in any violent crime committed in the United States. . . . Even if the minority of prisoners are black, the minority of victims are white (Sacco 1982, p. 91). When Lookwood (1980, p. 28) asked ‘targets’ to identify their aggressors at the time of their rape, most were black (80%), some were Hispanic (14%), and a few were white (6%). . . . Although many causation factors have been suggested for prison rape, they are all overshadowed by the racial categories of the victims and the rapists. Prison rape has been shown throughout this study to be racially motivated by predominantly black inmates specifically against white inmates who in turn are the victims. . . . racial hatred of whites by blacks appears to be the main force driving prison rape.

To put specific numbers on this, the report notes that studies consistently find that more than 90% of prison rapes are inter-racial and racially motivated. Blacks are found to be some 80% of the perpetrators, and whites are the vast majority of victims. Again, this is easily accessible in a peer-reviewed report published at a mainstream outlet. (So how are desegregated prisons working out for us now, huh?)

Can you connect the dots now? THIS is what political correctness means. “Political correctness” doesn’t mean making everyone use polite wording and asking people not to be mean. “Political correctness” means that because we won’t openly acknowledge the reality of the problem, white men raped by black men are literally one of the largest—and very possibly even the largest—category of sexual assault in the entirety of the whole United States, and you’ve been so ill-informed about this fact that I would sound like an alien if I were to say so in public, even though it is absolutely true.

Let me repeat that one more time so it sinks in: One of, and possibly the single largest demographic category of rape in the United States is the rape of white men by black men.

        Related: David Mamet’s Fraud Conservatism

READ MORE...


These adverts communicate an important message, telling us the aims and desires of the corporations

Posted by DanielS on Sunday, 19 November 2017 01:19.

        ...the YKW and liberals.

“These companies are all part of the problem and they are all pushing the same propaganda that pushes the agenda of White genocide; propaganda that normalizes the breeding-out of the indigenous people of these lands. These adverts are important though, as they communicate an important message to the public; they tell us the aims and desires of the globalist, capitalist system, the big corporations and the internationalists who control them; you see these internationalists have just shared with us their Christmas wish.” - Mark Collett.



READ MORE...


Farage names Soros in the European Parliament

Posted by Guessedworker on Tuesday, 14 November 2017 09:30.

In his speech in the European Parliament Farage refers to this document on “reliable allies” of the Open Society Foundation: https://legacy.gscdn.nl/archives/images/soroskooptbrussel.pdf

It’s all done with money, of course:

https://www.opensocietyfoundations.org/sites/default/files/open-society-initiative-for-europe-2015-20170424.pdf


So what are we to make of the crisis in Catalonia?

Posted by Guessedworker on Friday, 27 October 2017 12:31.

Momentous events have come to pass this afternoon, finally, in Barcelona, namely that the Catalan Parliament has voted to declare independence from Madrid, and just 40 minutes later Madrid has voted to furnish Mariano Rajoy with the power to invoke Article 155 of the Spanish constitution, suspending Catalan autonomy.  I think it is time for us to acknowledge this development and ask, if only via this brief (and rapidly written) post, what it means.

There has been much written over the last few weeks about the conflicted state of Catalan opinion, and many claims about the (supposedly) indistinguishable and unified Spanish ethnic type, and consequently about the negative and materialistic motives of Catalans in escaping the tax-hungry Spanish regions to the south and west.  To many of us it is self-evident that Spain is not just a state but a nation – we have all grown up with that belief – and the suddenness with which this whole crisis has exploded into our consciousness seems scarcely credible.  After all, Yugoslavia was never a real country, and once the Berlin Wall was down it was fully expected that fracture would occur, and that fracture might be accompanied by violence.  But this … this is happening in the liberal west of the continent to a key member of the EU, a member of NATO, a modern, industrialised democracy.  According to the customary assumptions about the liberal democratic model, it shouldn’t even be possible.

On the other hand, there is an undeniably ugly side to the Spanish government’s reaction to the events in Barcelona thus far.  It is patently obvious that there is no interest in trying to talk down the secessionists.  The Spanish regions enjoy maximum autonomy already.  There is nothing more to give in that direction.  The political possibilities for negotiation have been stripped bare.  All that remains is core principle and force, which express differently in each side.

This is, then, a classic contest between a genuine identitarian will, which cannot be satisfied with any amount of autonomy within another governing system, and the existential necessity of that system to maintain its integrity.

Well, we are ethnic nationalists.  In such a battle, our guide to what is right is not romantic and sentimental and not predicated on an overriding desire for peace.  We must favour what is most permanent and dear, and that is authentic peoplehood and identity.  The Catalans have it.  There are distinct genetic components in the people, stemming from a German influence which is seen nowhere else in the Iberian peninsula.  They have a language and a particular culture and history, and they have a pride in that.  These things are great givers of a courage which, on the surface anyway, looks as if it will not be brooked.  The Catalans will face the force of the Spanish government, and probably fight back with civil unrest, for example by denying Madrid their taxes.

But there is another, related and larger contest here which steers us towards supporting Catalonia.  All of us in the West, and especially in the European Union, are being ushered, by degrees, into a new supra-state.  It is a top-down, elite-led project, and its implications for nations, as expressions of a particular descent, belonging and loyalty, are destructive.  We see this most clearly today with the attempts by the EU bureaucracy to coerce Third World migrants upon the Visegrad states.

It is true that the Catalans do not seek freedom from Brussels, and seem not to have understood (any more than the SNP government in Edinburgh did in 2014) that Brussels cannot simply extend membership of the Union to a new European state.  But above and beyond the politics is the over-arching contest for and against the ethnic life.  Even if it does not know it today … even if the public discourse and the political ambition remain essentially liberal and not at all nationalist in any overtly recognisable sense… Catalonia is inducting itself into this historical contest.  Spain, meanwhile, in announcing its cold determination to survive, is taking its own inevitable place in the opposing camp - inevitable because post-Franco Spain, the Spain of Juan Carlos and democracy and admission to the then EC, was a project of modernisation, and modernisation, as understood in the half century after World War II, with all the bells and whistles of a brave new, subsuming openness to the world and its markets and its peoples, had no time for the introspection and the values of ethnic survival and self-preservation.

Metapolitically, such modernisation always treats of ethnicity within assimilation (or melting-pot) theory, attaching no greater worth or meaning to it than a lab researcher typically attaches to lab-rats.  Catalonian independence, like Brexit, like all the nationalist and near-nationalist advances in 2017, is inherently an insistence on the human worth and meaning of the ethnic life.

We are bound to support the Catalans in their brave bid for freedom and true autonomy.  It is our fight.


Page 1 of 685 |  [ 1 ]   [ 2 ]   [ 3 ]  | Next Page | Last Page

Venus

Existential Issues

DNA Nations

Establishment Problem

Categories

Links

Endorsement not implied.

Immigration

Islamist Threat

Anti-white Media Networks

Audio/Video

Crime

Economics

Education

General

Historical Re-Evaluation

Controlled Opposition

Nationalist Political Parties

Science

Europeans in Africa

Of Note

Comments

mancinblack commented in entry 'Trout Mask Replica' on Wed, 13 Dec 2017 12:56. (View)

mancinblack commented in entry 'Jonathon Porritt calls for progressive case for taking control of EU immigration' on Wed, 13 Dec 2017 11:42. (View)

Indian Strategy commented in entry 'The Indian/Chinese IQ puzzle continued for comments after 1000' on Tue, 12 Dec 2017 21:31. (View)

The standard accusations don't work there commented in entry '‘White Europe’: 60,000 nationalists march on Poland, call for a ‘White Europe of brotherly nations"' on Tue, 12 Dec 2017 14:40. (View)

Michael Gove commented in entry 'Post Brexit-vote roundtable: Leadership contest and the Turkish factor, Part 2.' on Tue, 12 Dec 2017 11:26. (View)

Guessedworker commented in entry 'A crisis in the custody suite – part 1' on Tue, 12 Dec 2017 05:53. (View)

Captainchaos commented in entry 'A crisis in the custody suite – part 1' on Mon, 11 Dec 2017 22:20. (View)

Morrakiu, dubious character behind Merchant Minute commented in entry 'These Are White Nationalists? What Is Behind TRS And The Alt-Right's Gushing Effusion For Trump?' on Mon, 11 Dec 2017 22:10. (View)

a clue of Islam’s Jewish origins commented in entry 'Jews Created Islam: Ideological capture as a response to constraints of Jewish ethnic exclusivism' on Mon, 11 Dec 2017 15:59. (View)

Katie Hopkins panders to Israel commented in entry ''Western man, stand up for your wives, daughters', Kate Hopkins tweet investigated as inciting hate' on Mon, 11 Dec 2017 15:28. (View)

mancinblack commented in entry 'Hungary and Slovakia Must Admit Refugees as Part of EU Relocation Program, EU Court Rules' on Mon, 11 Dec 2017 13:52. (View)

mancinblack commented in entry '"Miss Grand Myanmar", Shwe Eain Si, stripped of her title for telling truth about crisis in Rakhine' on Mon, 11 Dec 2017 12:31. (View)

mancinblack commented in entry 'Cernovich daggers and shields for the Alt-Right' on Mon, 11 Dec 2017 08:34. (View)

pennine commented in entry 'Kevin Crehan, 35, jailed for leaving bacon in front of mosque then executed by Muslims in his cell' on Mon, 11 Dec 2017 07:34. (View)

Rutgers prof in trouble for posts on Faceberg commented in entry 'Merkel and Zuckerberg are teaming up to attack you on Facebook' on Mon, 11 Dec 2017 00:00. (View)

On the Rise of Mixed-Race Britain commented in entry 'Harry engages old colored woman, threatens to adulterate Royal line's representation of 41,000 years' on Sun, 10 Dec 2017 09:00. (View)

Shamychel commented in entry '“Do you like white women? Because we have a lot of them at Baylor, and they love football players."' on Sun, 10 Dec 2017 06:11. (View)

Ukwuachu commented in entry '“Do you like white women? Because we have a lot of them at Baylor, and they love football players."' on Sun, 10 Dec 2017 05:59. (View)

Shawn commented in entry '“Do you like white women? Because we have a lot of them at Baylor, and they love football players."' on Sun, 10 Dec 2017 05:38. (View)

Chafin commented in entry '“Do you like white women? Because we have a lot of them at Baylor, and they love football players."' on Sun, 10 Dec 2017 05:05. (View)

The Nation: The Alt-Right Looks Left commented in entry 'White Left Imperative to defense, systemic health of European peoples' on Sat, 09 Dec 2017 14:35. (View)

DanielS commented in entry 'Jez on great form' on Sat, 09 Dec 2017 04:34. (View)

National-Satanist commented in entry 'Jez on great form' on Sat, 09 Dec 2017 04:23. (View)

DanielS commented in entry 'Netanyahu Concerned Race-mixing to Destroy Liberal Jews and American support' on Sat, 09 Dec 2017 01:42. (View)

Merkel seeks 390,000 Family Reunification Visas commented in entry 'EP President Schulz: Germany exists only in order to ensure the existence of the Jewish people.' on Fri, 08 Dec 2017 04:23. (View)

Flynn, "we're going to rip-up those sanctions and" commented in entry 'Evidence of Trump-Russia Collusion Already Exists, Watergate Prosecutors Say' on Thu, 07 Dec 2017 18:44. (View)

(((Lauren Southern))) commented in entry 'Hardly The Battle of Cable Street: What Berkeley Doesn't Mean' on Thu, 07 Dec 2017 18:28. (View)

mancinblack commented in entry 'EP President Schulz: Germany exists only in order to ensure the existence of the Jewish people.' on Thu, 07 Dec 2017 12:20. (View)

mancinblack commented in entry 'EP President Schulz: Germany exists only in order to ensure the existence of the Jewish people.' on Thu, 07 Dec 2017 11:34. (View)

Schulz calls for United States of Europe commented in entry 'EP President Schulz: Germany exists only in order to ensure the existence of the Jewish people.' on Thu, 07 Dec 2017 09:24. (View)

Russia likely Israeli match-maker commented in entry '"Israeli Defense Minister: 'I Prefer ISIS to Iran on Our Borders"' on Wed, 06 Dec 2017 03:10. (View)

Russia cheated at Sochi, banned at S Korea commented in entry 'N.Korean threat/capacity, shows both determinism & social construction by contrast to southern twin' on Wed, 06 Dec 2017 02:52. (View)

Lyon Christmas market cancelled by cost of terror commented in entry 'Berlin terror attack: 12 dead, 49 injured as truck ploughs into crowd at Christmas market' on Wed, 06 Dec 2017 01:22. (View)

Islamic plot to kill PM Theresa May foiled commented in entry 'Weston disbands Liberty GB in favor of backing Anne Marie Waters For Britain' on Wed, 06 Dec 2017 01:08. (View)

Cernovich daggers & shields for the alt-right commented in entry 'Cernovich seeds FireMcMaster hashtag propagated by 600 most active Russian Twitter operative handles' on Tue, 05 Dec 2017 20:22. (View)

Majorityrights shield

Sovereignty badge